Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Carcinoma – a Role in Patients with Para-aortic Lymph Node Involvement? A 10-year Institutional Experience

AimsOverall survival and progression-free survival with concomitant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cervical carcinoma have been described as 66% and 58%, respectively, at 5 years. Para-aortic lymph node involvement significantly increases the risk of relapse and death. The role of additional chemotherapy in these patients is as yet undefined. This aim of the present study was to determine the outcome of a cohort of para-aortic lymph node-positive patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by extended-field chemoradiation compared with patients treated with extended-field chemoradiation without neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Materials and methodsWe reviewed patients with International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2014 stage IB1–IVA cervical carcinoma who received extended-field radiotherapy in addition to standard pelvic chemoradiotherapy with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy, at University College London Hospital (January 2007 to January 2018). Patients in open clinical trials were excluded.ResultsOverall, 47 patients (15.8% of 298 eligible patients) with pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph node-positive cervical carcinoma received extended-field radiotherapy. Nineteen patients (40.4%) had both neoadjuvant chemotherapy (all received six cycles) and extended-field radiotherapy (median 44 days); 28 (59.6%) patients received extended-field radiotherapy alone (median 43 days). All patients completed radical radiotherapy within 49 days. We observed evidence that patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and extended-field radiotherapy had a lower risk of death (median follow-up 4.8 years, three deaths) compared with extended-field radiotherapy alone (median follow-up 3.0 years, 11 deaths; hazard ratio = 0.27, 95% confidence interval 0.08–1.00; P = 0.05). Three-year overall survival rates were 83.3% (95% confidence interval 66.1–100) and 64.6% (95% confidence interval 44.6–84.6), respectively. A PFS benefit was seen (hazard ratio 0.25, 95% confidence interval 0.08–0.77; P = 0.02), with 3-year PFS rates of 77.8% (95% confidence interval 58.6–97.0) and 35.0% (95% confidence interval 14.0–56.0), respectively.ConclusionsOur institutional experience suggests that the use of additional systemic therapy before chemoradiotherapy benefits patients with locoregionally advanced (FIGO 2018 IIIC2) cervical cancer. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with longer overall survival and PFS, without compromising definitive extended-field chemoradiation.     

Comorbidities,timing of treatments,and chemotherapy use influence outcomes in stage III colon cancer: A population-based European study

IntroductionFor stage III colon cancer (CC), surgery followed by chemotherapy is the main curative approach, although optimum times between diagnosis and surgery, and surgery and chemotherapy, have not been established.Materials and methodsWe analysed a population-based sample of 1912 stage III CC cases diagnosed in eight European countries in 2009–2013 aiming to estimate: (i) odds of receiving postoperative chemotherapy, overall and within eight weeks of surgery; (ii) risks of death/relapse, according to treatment, Charlson Comorbidity Index, time from diagnosis to surgery for emergency and elective cases, and time from surgery to chemotherapy; and (iii) time-trends in chemotherapy use.ResultsOverall, 97% of cases received surgery and 65% postoperative chemotherapy, with 71% of these receiving chemotherapy within eight weeks of surgery. Risks of death and relapse were higher for cases starting chemotherapy with delay, but better than for cases not given chemotherapy. Fewer patients with high comorbidities received chemotherapy than those with low (P < 0.001). Chemotherapy timing did not vary (P = 0.250) between high and low comorbidity cases. Electively-operated cases with low comorbidities received surgery more promptly than high comorbidity cases. Risks of death and relapse were lower for elective cases given surgery after four weeks than cases given surgery within a week. High comorbidities were always independently associated with poorer outcomes. Chemotherapy use increased over time.ConclusionsOur data indicate that promptly-administered postoperative chemotherapy maximizes its benefit, and that careful assessment of comorbidities is important before treatment. The survival benefit associated with slightly delayed elective surgery deserves further investigation.     

Perioperative,short-, and long-term outcomes of gastric cancer surgery: Propensity score-matched analysis of patients with or without prior solid organ transplantation

BackgroundDetails of perioperative outcomes and survival after gastric cancer surgery in prior transplant recipients have received minimal research attention.MethodsWe performed an observational cohort study using the database of 20,147 gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy at a single gastric cancer center in Korea. Forty-one solid organ recipients [kidney (n = 35), liver (n = 5), or heart (n = 1)] were matched with 205 controls using propensity score matching.ResultsOperation time, blood loss, and postoperative pain were similar between groups. Short-term complication rates were similar between transplantation and control groups (22.0% vs. 20.1%, P = 0.777). Transplantation group patients with stage 1 gastric cancer experienced no recurrence, while those with stage 2/3 cancer had significantly higher recurrence risk compared to the controls (P = 0.049). For patients with stage 1 cancer, the transplantation group had a significantly higher rate of non-gastric cancer-related deaths compared to the controls (19.2% vs. 1.4%, P = 0.001). For those with stage 2/3 cancer, significantly lower proportion of the transplantation group received adjuvant chemotherapy compared to the control group (26.7% vs. 80.3%, P < 0.001). The transplantation group had a higher (albeit not statistically significant) rate of gastric cancer-related deaths compared to the controls (40.0% vs. 18.0%, P = 0.087).ConclusionTransplant recipients and non-transplant recipients exhibited similar perioperative and short-term outcomes after gastric cancer surgery. From long-term outcome analyses, we suggest active surveillance for non-gastric cancer-related deaths in patients with early gastric cancer, as well as strict oncologic care in patients with advanced cancer, as effective strategies for transplant recipients.     

Real-world role of performance status in surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter study

BackgroundThe Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) categorizes a patient with performance status (PS)-1 as advanced stage of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and surgical resection is not recommended. In real-world clinical practice, PS-1 is often not a contraindication to surgery for HCC. The aim of current study was to define the impact of PS on the surgical outcomes of patients undergoing liver resection for HCC.Methods1,531 consecutive patients who underwent a curative-intent resection of HCC between 2005 and 2015 were identified using a multi-institutional database. After categorizing patients into PS-0 (n = 836) versus PS-1 (n = 695), perioperative mortality and morbidity, overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared.ResultsOverall perioperative mortality and major morbidity among patients with PS-0 (n = 836) and PS-1 (n = 695) were similar (1.4% vs. 1.6%, P = 0.525 and 9.7% vs. 10.2%, P = 0.732, respectively). In contrast, median OS and RFS was worse among patients who had PS-1 versus PS-0 (34.0 vs. 107.6 months, and 20.5 vs. 60.6 months, both P < 0.001, respectively). On multivariable Cox-regression analyses, PS-1 was independently associated with worse OS (HR: 1.301, 95% CI: 1.111–1.523, P < 0.001) and RFS (HR: 1.184, 95% CI: 1.034–1.358, P = 0.007).ConclusionsPatients with PS-1 versus PS-0 had comparable perioperative outcomes. However, patients with PS-1 had worse long-term outcomes as PS-1 was independently associated with worse OS and RFS. Routine exclusion of HCC patients with PS-1 from surgical resection as recommended by the BCLC guidelines is not warranted.     

Systemic inflammatory markers for the detection of infectious complications and safe discharge after cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC

IntroductionCytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC) in patients with ovarian peritoneal carcinomatosis may be associated with a high postoperative morbidity. An early discrimination of postoperative complications is crucial for both improving clinical outcomes and proposing a safe discharge.Material and methodsIn a cohort of 122 patients with advanced ovarian cancer (FIGO III-IV), we analyzed the diagnostic performance of three systemic inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein, white blood cell count and systemic immune-inflammation index) between the 5th to 8th postoperative days to prediction postoperative infectious complications. An optimal cut-off value was established in order to discriminate between the group of patients who developed infectious complications or not during the postoperative period.ResultsThe median peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) was 15. The overall infectious morbidity was 25.4% (31 patients out of 122), of which, 32% (10 patients out of 31) had suffered severe postoperative complications (Dindo-Clavien III-IV). The most accurate results for detecting infectious complications were obtained by using C-reactive protein, which presented an excellent diagnostic performance, especially on the 7th and 8th postoperative days (AUC = 0,857 and 0,920; respectively).ConclusionsThese results support that it is safe to discharge patients with C-reactive protein concentrations lower than 88 mg/L and 130 mg/L, on the 7th and 8th postoperative days, respectively.     

R1 pancreatic cancer patients benefit from chemoradiation when initiation of adjuvant therapy is delayed

BackgroundAdjuvant chemotherapy (AC) following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreas cancer (PDAC) has been demonstrated to improve survival. However, the optimal adjuvant treatment (AT) regimen for R1-margin patients remains unclear. This retrospective study investigates the impact of AC vs. adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (ACRT) on survival (OS).Material and methodsThe NCDB was queried for patients with PDAC who underwent PD between 2010 and 2018. Patients were divided into, (A) AC<60 days, (B) ACRT<60 days, (C) AC≥60 days, and (D) ACRT≥60 days. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and Cox multivariable regression analyses were performed.ResultsAmong 13 740 patients, median OS was 23.7 months. For R1 patients, median OS for timely AC and ACRT, and delayed AC and ACRT was 19.91, 19.19, 15.24, 18.96 months, respectively. While time of AC initiation was an insignificant factor for R0 patients (p = 0.263, CI 0.957–1.173), a survival benefit was found for R1 patients who received AC<60 vs. ≥60 days (p = 0.041, CI 1.002–1.42). Among R1 patients, administration of delayed ACRT achieves the same survival benefit of timely AC initiation (p = 0.074, CI 0.703–1.077).ConclusionThe study suggests value in ACRT for patients with R1 margins when delay of AT≥60 days cannot be avoided. Hence, ACRT may mitigate the negative impact of delayed AT initiation for R1-patients.     

Effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the survival outcomes of patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PurposeTo determine the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) versus primary surgery on survival outcomes for resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using an approach based on a meta-analysis.MethodsThe PubMed, EmBase, Cochrane library, and CNKI databases were systematically browsed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which met a set of predetermined inclusion criteria throughout January 2020. Hazard ratios (HRs) were applied for the pooled overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) values, and the pooled survival rates at 1-year and 3-year were used as the relative risk (RR). All the pooled effect estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model.ResultsNineteen RCTs contained a total of 4372 NSCLC at I-III stages was selected for final meta-analysis. We noted NACT was significantly associated with an improvement in OS (HR: 0.87; 95%CI: 0.81–0.94; P < 0.001) and PFS (HR: 0.86; 95%CI: 0.78–0.96; P = 0.005). Moreover, the survival rate at 1-year (RR: 1.07; 95%CI: 1.02–1.12; P = 0.007) and 3-year (RR: 1.16; 95%CI: 1.06–1.27; P = 0.001) in the NACT group was significantly higher than the survival rate for the primary surgery group. Finally, the treatment effects of NACT versus primary surgery on survival outcomes might be different when stratified by the mean age of patients and the tumor stages.ConclusionsNACT could improve survival outcomes for patients with resectable NSCLC, suggesting its suitable future applicability for clinical practice. However, large-scale RCT should be conducted to assess the chemotherapy regimen on the prognosis of resectable NSCLC.     

Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on post-hepatectomy regeneration for patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis – Systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundToday, there is still debate on the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NeoChem) on liver regeneration (LivReg). The objectives of this study were to assess the impact of NeoChem and its characteristics (addition of bevacizumab, number of cycles and time from end of NeoChem) on post-hepatectomy LivReg.Material & methodsStudies reporting LivReg in patients submitted to liver resection were included. Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched. Only studies comparing NeoChem vs no chemotherapy or comparing chemotherapy characteristics from 1990 to present were included. Two researchers individually screened the identified records registered in a predesigned database. Primary outcome was future liver remnant regeneration rate (FLR3). Bias of the studies was evaluated with the ROBINS-I tool, and quality of evidence with the GRADE system. Data was presented as mean difference or standard mean difference.ResultsEight studies with a total of 681 patients were selected. Seven were retrospective and one prospective comparative cohort studies. In patients submitted to major hepatectomy, NeoChem did not have an impact on LivReg (MD 3.12, 95% CI -2,12–8.36, p 0,24). Adding bevacizumab to standard NeoChem was associated with better FLR3 (SMD 0.45, 95% CI 0.19–0.71, p 0.0006).DiscussionThe main drawback of this review is the retrospective nature of the available studies. NeoChem does not have a negative impact on postoperative LivReg in patients submitted to liver resection. Regimens with bevacizumab seem to be associated with better postoperative LivReg rates when compared to standard NeoChem.     

Utility of a modified age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index in predicting cause-specific survival among patients with gastric cancer

IntroductionThe current study aimed to evaluate the ability of a modified version of the age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (mACCI) in predicting cause-specific survival (CSS) among patients with gastric cancer who underwent curative gastrectomy and compared it with the conventional ACCI.Materials and methodsPatients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer from 2007 to 2016 (n = 2885) were included. A mACCI was established by excluding scores for other malignancies, such as other cancers, leukemia, and lymphoma. After determining the optimal cutoff ACCI and mACCI values for CSS, clinicopathological factors and survival outcomes were assessed according to the ACCI and mACCI.ResultsBoth ACCI and mACCI were identified as independent prognostic factors for overall survival (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). However, only mACCI was identified as an independent prognostic factor for CSS (p < 0.001). The present study suggested that mACCI was a better indicator of CSS in patients with gastric cancer who underwent curative gastrectomy than ACCI.ConclusionOur findings showed that the mACCI was a strong predictor of CSS in patients with gastric cancer who underwent curative gastrectomy. We believe that the mACCI will become a novel marker that would guide treatment decisions for patients with gastric cancer suffering from comorbidities.     

The absence of benefit of perioperative chemotherapy in initially resectable peritoneal metastases of colorectal cancer origin treated with complete cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: A retrospective analysis

IntroductionThe aim of this study was to compare the outcome of patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) of colorectal origin treated with complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with or without perioperative systemic chemotherapy (PCT+/PCT-).Patients and methodsRetrospective analysis of 125 patients treated with complete CRS (R0/R1) and HIPEC for PM from colorectal origin in two Belgian academic centers between 2008 and 2017. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed with regard to PCT. Statistical analyses were adjusted for non-balanced survival risk factors.ResultsThe PCT+ group (n = 67) received at least 5 cycles of PCT and the PCT-group (n = 56) did not receive PCT. The groups were well balanced for all prognostic factors except presentation of synchronous disease (more in PCT+). Survival analysis was adjusted to peritoneal cancer index and presentation of synchronous disease. After a median follow-up of 54±5-months, the 1, 3, 5-years OS in the PCT+ group were 98%, 59% and 35% compared to 97%, 77% and 56% in the PCT-group (HR = 1.46; 95% CI:0.87–2.47; p = 0.155). The 1,3 and 5 years DFS in the PCT+ group were 47%, 13% and 6% compared to 58%, 29% and 26% respectively in the PCT- (HR = 1.22; 95% CI:0.78–1.92; p = 0.376).ConclusionThis study does not show any clear benefit of PCT in carefully selected patients undergoing R0/R1 CRS and HIPEC for colorectal PM. The ongoing CAIRO6 trial randomizing CRS/HIPEC versus CRS/HIPEC and PCT will probably clarify the role of PCT in patients with resectable PM.     

Days alive and out of hospital after surgical treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer: A Danish nationwide cohort study

ObjectiveDays alive and out of hospital (DAOH) is a validated outcome measure in perioperative trials integrating information on primary hospitalization, readmissions, and mortality. It is negatively associated with advanced age. However, DAOH has not been described for surgical treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), primarily diagnosed in older patients.MethodsWe conducted a Danish nationwide cohort study including patients undergoing debulking surgery for EOC from 2013 to 2018. DAOH was explored for 30 (DAOH30), 90 (DAOH90), and 180 (DAOH180) postoperative days in younger (<70 years) and older (≥70 years) patients with advanced-stage disease stratified by surgical modality (primary (PDS) or interval debulking surgery (IDS)). We examined the associations between patient- and surgical outcomes and low or high DAOH30.ResultsOverall, 1168 patients had stage IIIC-IV disease and underwent debulking surgery. DAOH30 was 22 days [interquartile range (IQR): 18, 25] and 23 days [IQR: 18, 25] for younger and older patients treated with PDS, respectively. For IDS, DAOH30 was 25 days [IQR: 22, 26] for younger and 25 days[IQR: 21, 26] for older patients. We found no significant differences between age cohorts regarding DAOH30, DAOH90, and DAOH180. Low DAOH30 was associated with poor performance status, PDS, extensive surgery, and long duration of surgery in adjusted analysis.ConclusionsDAOH did not differ significantly between age cohorts. Surgical rather than patient-related factors were associated with low DAOH30. Our results likely reflect a high selection of fit older patients for surgery, reducing the patient-related differences between younger and older patients receiving surgical treatment.     

The technique and outcomes of central hepatectomy by the Glissonian suprahilar approach

IntroductionCentral hepatectomy (CH) is technically challenging and seldom-used to treat centrally located tumors. However, CH is a parenchyma-sparing resection that may decrease the risk of postoperative liver failure. This retrospective study presents our technique of CH and assesses the outcomes.MethodsAll CH performed in our department over two decades (1997–2017) were identified. Indications and short-term outcomes were compared between the two decades. Long-term outcomes were assessed.ResultsSixty-four patients underwent CH using a suprahilar approach for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC: n = 30), metastasis (n = 23), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCCA: n = 9) or other diseases (n = 2). CH represented 6% of 1004 major hepatectomies, (7.4% (n = 35) before 2007 vs 5.4% (n = 29) after 2007). The mean operating time was 219 ± 56 min. A perioperative blood transfusion was required in 14 patients (22%). Intraoperative bile duct injuries occurred in 5 patients (8%), and they were repaired. One patient died postoperatively (1,5%). Ten patients (16%) experienced a major complication. Nine patients (14%) suffered from bile leakage, of which 6 healed spontaneously. Only one patient had low grade liver failure. The R0-resection rate was 69%. After 2007, there were no bile duct injuries (0/29 vs 5/35, p < 0.05), and the average hospital stay was shorter but not significantly (11 vs 14 days). Actuarial 5-year survival was 56% for HCC patients and 34% for those with colorectal metastasisConclusionsCH is associated with significant biliary morbidity and may increase positive surgical margins. Nevertheless, it should be recommended in selected patients to avoid the risk of postoperative liver failure.     

Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) with or without hyperthermic IntraPEritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations — Part II: Postoperative management and special considerations

BackgroundEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have been shown to considerably reduce complications, length of stay and costs after most of surgical procedures by standardised application of best evidence-based perioperative care. The aim was to elaborate dedicated recommendations for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) ± hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in a two-part series of guidelines based on expert consensus. The present part II of the guidelines highlights postoperative management and special considerations.MethodsThe core group assembled a multidisciplinary panel of 24 experts involved in peritoneal surface malignancy surgery representing the fields of general surgery (n = 12), gynaecological surgery (n = 6), and anaesthesia (n = 6). Experts systematically reviewed and summarized the available evidence on 72 identified perioperative care items, following the GRADE (grading of recommendations, assessment, development, evaluation) system. Final consensus (defined as ≥50%, or ≥70% of weak/strong recommendations combined) was reached by a standardised 2-round Delphi process, regarding the strength of recommendations.ResultsResponse rates were 100% for both Delphi rounds. Quality of evidence was evaluated high, moderate low and very low, for 15 (21%), 26 (36%), 29 (40%) and 2 items, respectively. Consensus was reached for 71/72(98.6%) items. Strong recommendations were defined for 37 items. No consensus could be reached regarding the preemptive use of fresh frozen plasma.ConclusionThe present ERAS recommendations for CRS ± HIPEC are based on a standardised expert consensus process providing clinicians with valuable guidance. There is an urgent need to produce high quality studies for CRS ± HIPEC and to prospectively evaluate recommendations in clinical practice.     

Prognostic factor analysis of irreversible electroporation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer – A multi-institutional clinical study in Asia

IntroductionIrreversible electroporation (IRE) is a modality that utilizes high electric voltage to cause cell apoptosis. IRE has been used to treat locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). However, studies of IRE via surgical approaches for LAPC are limited. This study aims to analyse the outcomes and related prognostic factors of IRE for Asian patients with LAPC.Materials and methodsFrom 2012 to 2017, this prospective trial for using IRE through surgical approaches for LAPC was conducted in 11 medical centres in Asia. All related and treatment outcomes were analysed from a prospective database.ResultsSeventy-four patients were enrolled. Thirty complications occurred in thirteen (17.6%) patients without mortality. The electrode placement direction (anteroposterior vs. craniocaudal, HR = 14.2, p < 0.01) and gastrointestinal invasion (HR = 15.7, p < 0.01) were significant factors for complications. The progression-free survival (PFS) rate in one year, three years, and five years were 69.1%, 48.7%, and 28.8%, and the overall survival (OS) rate in one year, three years, and five years were 97.2%, 53%, and 31.2%. In univariate analysis, the chemotherapy regimen, local tumour recurrence, axial tumour length, tumour volume, and serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels were all significantly associated with PFS and OS. In multivariate analysis, the chemotherapy regimen was the only significant factor associated with PFS and OS. TS-1 (Tegafur, gimeracil, and oteracil) group has superior survival outcome than gemcitabine group.ConclusionThis study showed that combined induction chemotherapy and surgical IRE for LAPC is safe. For well-selected patients, IRE can achieve encouraging survival outcomes.     

Postoperative pancreatic fistulas decrease the survival of pancreatic cancer patients treated with surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: A retrospective analysis

Background and objectivesA postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a critical complication after surgery for pancreatic cancer. Whether a POPF affects the long-term prognosis of pancreatic cancer cases remains controversial. This study aimed to clarify the effect of a POPF on the long-term prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients, especially after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT).MethodsPatients who underwent curative pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer between January 2012 and June 2019 at Kyoto University Hospital were retrospectively investigated. A fistula ≥ Grade B was considered a POPF.ResultsDuring the study period, 148 patients underwent upfront surgery (Upfront group), and 52 patients underwent surgery after NACRT (NACRT group). A POPF developed in 16% of patients in the Upfront group and 13% in the NACRT group (p = 0.824). In the Upfront group, development of a POPF did not have a significant effect on recurrence-free survival (p = 0.766) or overall survival (p = 0.863). However, in the NACRT group, development of a POPF significantly decreased recurrence-free survival (HR 5.856, p = 0.002) and overall survival (HR 7.097, p = 0.020) on multivariate analysis.ConclusionsThe development of a POPF decreases the survival of pancreatic cancer patients treated by surgery after NACRT.     

Perioperative nutritional assessment and interventions in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): A systematic review

BackgroundPeritoneal carcinomatosis is a catabolic state and cytoreductive surgery (CRS) is a high morbidity operation. Optimising perioperative nutrition is crucial to improve outcomes. This systematic review sought to examine literature describing clinical outcomes related to preoperative nutrition status and nutrition interventions in patients undergoing CRS with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).MethodsA systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (300326). A search of eight electronic databases was undertaken on 8th May 2022 and reported according to the PRISMA statement. Studies reporting nutrition status through use of screening and assessment tools, nutrition interventions or nutrition-related clinical outcomes for patients undergoing CRS with HIPEC were included.ResultsOf 276 screened studies, 25 studies were included for review. Commonly used nutrition assessment tools for CRS-HIPEC patients included Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), sarcopenia assessment with computed tomography, preoperative albumin, and body mass index (BMI). Three retrospective studies compared SGA with postoperative outcomes. Malnourished patients were more likely to have postoperative infectious complications (p = 0.042 SGA-B, p = 0.025 SGA-C). Malnutrition was significantly associated with increased hospital length of stay (LOS) in two studies (p = 0.006, p = 0.02), and with overall survival in another study (p = 0.006). Eight studies analysing preoperative albumin levels reported conflicting associations with postoperative outcomes. BMI in five studies was not associated with morbidity. One study did not support routine nasogastric tube (NGT) feeding.ConclusionsPreoperative nutritional assessment tools, including SGA and objective sarcopaenia measures, have a role in predicting nutritional status for CRS-HIPEC patients. Optimisation of nutrition is important for preventing complications.     

Novel implications of combined arterial resection for locally advanced pancreatic cancer in the era of newer chemo-regimens

IntroductionIn this study, we assessed the prognostic efficacy and feasibility of combined arterial resection (AR) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), and aimed to identify significant prognostic factors for patients who underwent combined AR.MethodsBetween 1981 and 2018, 733 consecutive patients who underwent pancreatic surgery for PC were identified. The 730 cases with detailed information were enrolled in the analysis.ResultsAmong 730 resected PC patients, 44 (6%) underwent AR including 21 hepatic (48%), 12 celiac (27%), five splenic (12%), four superior mesenteric (9%), and two other arteries (4%). The combined AR surgery showed significantly longer operative time (median, 608 vs 451 min, P < 0.0001), and the incidence of intraoperative blood transfusion was significantly higher in AR than surgery without AR (P = 0.0002), whereas there was no significant difference in the intraoperative blood loss (970 vs 1200 mL, P = 0.2) and occurrence of major complications (P = 0.5). In prognostic analysis of AR cases, multivariate Cox proportional hazard models revealed preoperative and postoperative therapy were the independent factors for both recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) (preoperative therapy: RFS, HR = 0.21, P = 0.007; OS, HR = 0.18, P = 0.01; postoperative therapy: RFS, HR = 0.31, P = 0.003; OS, HR = 0.19, P = 0.002).ConclusionThis study showed the feasibility of combined AR for LAPC and robust association of pre- and postoperative therapy and survival after AR surgery. Preoperative therapy following combined AR surgery is potentially powerful strategy for LAPC.     

Do certain surgical steps increase postoperative morbidity after cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC- a retrospective analysis

IntroductionIt has been shown that cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in combination with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is an effective treatment for patients suffering from peritoneal malignancies. Despite good results, there is an ongoing debate about this treatment due to perioperative morbidity.The aim of this study is to identify relevant risk factors for an unfavorable postoperative outcome after CRS and HIPEC.Materials and methodsA retrospective analysis of a prospectively recorded database of all patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC between 2013 and 2020 in the Department of Surgery of the University Hospital Dresden was performed with a special focus on certain surgical steps of multivisceral resection, one- or 2- stage CRS/HIPEC and underlying diagnosis as possible risk factors for worse postoperative course.ResultsN = 173 CRS and HIPEC procedures were performed for various diagnoses. Relevant postoperative morbidity was 24% and 30d-mortality 1.2%. Simultaneous liver resections, preoperative hypalbuminemia and 2-staged CRS/HIPEC were significant risk factors for a worse postoperative course in multivariable analysis. Assessment of the association of simultaneous anastomoses and morbidity and mortality was inconclusive.ConclusionCRS and HIPEC is a safe treatment without relevant intraoperative morbidity and mortality and acceptable postoperative outcome. One-stage CRS/HIPEC should be preferred.     

Prognostic significance of CA-125 re-elevation after interval debulking surgery in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy

AimsWe evaluated the prognostic significance of postoperative re-elevation of cancer antigen-125 (CA-125) levels in patients with ovarian cancer and preoperative normalization of CA-125 levels after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).MethodsThe data of 103 patients with preoperative CA-125 normalization after NAC at the Yonsei Cancer Hospital (2006–2017) were analyzed. We compared the clinical characteristics and survival outcomes among patients with normal postoperative CA-125 levels and those with re-elevated CA-125 levels after interval debulking surgery (IDS). CA-125 elevation was defined as levels >35 U/mL.ResultsAmong 103 patients, 52 (50.5%) and 51 (49.5%) had normal and re-elevated CA-125 levels after IDS, respectively. Patients with CA-125 re-elevation underwent more radical surgeries during IDS than those with normal CA-125 levels (p = 0.018). We found no significant differences in progression-free survival (PFS; p = 0.726) or overall survival (OS; p = 0.293) between the two groups. Moreover, patients with persistent CA-125 elevation (3 weeks after IDS) did not have inferior PFS (p = 0.171 and p = 0.208, respectively) or OS (p = 0.128 and p = 0.095, respectively) compared to patients with early normalization (within 3 weeks of IDS) or normal CA-125 levels. Multivariate regression showed that CA-125 re-elevation had no effect on recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43–1.30) or death (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.33–2.98).ConclusionAmong patients with preoperative CA-125 normalization after NAC, postoperative CA-125 re-elevation had no prognostic value. Novel and reliable biomarkers reflecting the tumor response after IDS should be identified.     

Optimal extent of lymph node dissection in patients with gastric cancer who underwent non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection with a positive vertical margin

BackgroundThe optimal extent of lymph node dissection in patients receiving non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and diagnosed with a positive vertical margin is unclear. This study attempted to identify optimal candidates for D2 lymph node dissection among these patients.MethodsThis study included patients who underwent gastrectomy for primary gastric cancer following non-curative ESD with a positive vertical margin between January 2002 and December 2018. We classified the patients according to the positive vertical margin pattern into an obvious exposure group and a non-obvious exposure group. We developed a score model for predicting lymph node metastasis (LNM) using factors selected by multivariate analyses and beta regression coefficients, and the incidence of LNM was evaluated.ResultsThis study included 110 patients. LNM was detected in 17 patients (15%). We developed a predictive scoring system as follows: tumor size >30 mm (0, No; 1, Yes) + undifferentiated type tumor in the invasive front (0, No; 2, Yes) + depth of submucosal invasion > 1500 μm (0, No; 1, Yes) + obvious tumor exposure at the vertical margin (0, No; 1, Yes). In patients with 5 points, the incidence rates of all and group 2 LNM were as high as 60% and 40%, respectively. Conversely, in patients with fewer than 5 points, the incidence rates of all and group 2 LNM were just 11% and 5%, respectively.ConclusionIn patients with 5 points according to our score model for predicting LNM, gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection is recommended.