Survival outcomes after breast-conserving therapy compared with mastectomy for patients with early-stage metaplastic breast cancer: a population-based study of 2412 patients

BackgroundPrevious studies revealed that patients with early-stage metaplastic breast cancer (MBC) underwent mastectomy more often than breast-conserving therapy (BCT) mainly due to the larger tumor size. This study was performed to compare the survival outcomes following BCT versus mastectomy for patients with early-stage MBC.MethodsSurveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify women diagnosed with early-stage MBC (T1-3N0-3M0) between 2001 and 2016, who were treated with either BCT or mastectomy. We assessed overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) using the Kaplan-Meier method and hazard ratios using Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsA total of 2412 MBC patients were identified, 881 (36.5%) of whom underwent BCT and 1531(63.5%) underwent mastectomy. The median follow-up time was 73 months. Most of patients had older age (≥50 years old), larger tumor size, higher American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage and hormone receptor negativity. After adjustment for confounding variables, patients who underwent BCT had significantly improved OS (5-year OS: 84.3% vs 62.5%; 10-year OS: 73.0% vs 52.1%; adjusted HR = 0.76, 95%CI: 0.59–0.97, p = 0.028) and BCSS (5-year BCSS: 89.1% vs 70.8%; 10-year BCSS: 83.9% vs 67.5%; adjusted HR = 0.72, 95%CI: 0.53–0.96, p = 0.026) than those who underwent mastectomy, and this improvement remained significant for all T and N stages of MBC except for N2-3 stage.ConclusionBCT conferred improved OS and BCSS compared with mastectomy for patients with early-stage MBC, and the improvement persisted in almost all of the subgroups of different T and N stages.     

Predicting the survival benefit of local surgery in patients aged 70 years or older with stage IV breast cancer: A population-based analysis

PurposeThe aim of this study was to establish individualized nomograms to predict survival outcomes in older female patients with stage IV breast cancer who did or did not undergo local surgery, and to determine which patients could benefit from surgery.MethodsA total of 3,129 female patients with stage IV breast cancer aged ≥70 years between 2010 and 2015 were included in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier plot and log-rank test. Nomograms and risk stratification models were constructed.ResultsPatients who underwent surgery had better OS (HR = 0.751, 95% CI [0.668–0.843], P < 0.001) and BCSS (HR = 0.713, 95% CI [0.627–0.810], P < 0.001) than patients who did not undergo surgery. Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, lung or liver metastases may not benefit from surgery. In the stratification model, low-risk patients benefited from surgery (OS, HR = 0.688, 95% CI [0.568–0.833], P < 0.001; BCSS, HR = 0.632, 95% CI [0.509–0.784], P < 0.001), while patients in the high-risk group had similar outcomes (OS, HR = 0.920, 95% CI [0.709–1.193], P = 0.509; BCSS, HR = 0.953, 95% CI [0.713–1.275], P = 0.737).ConclusionOlder female patients with stage IV breast cancer who underwent surgery had better OS and BCSS than those who did not in each specific subgroup. Patients in low- or intermediate-risk group benefit from surgery while those in the high-risk group do not.     

Adjuvant chemotherapy could benefit early-stage ER/PR positive mucinous breast cancer: A SEER-based analysis

PurposeThe aim of this study was to explore the value of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early-stage ER/PR-positive mucinous carcinoma.MethodsWe identified early-stage ER/PR-positive mucinous carcinoma patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We used propensity-score matching (PSM) analysis to eliminate selection bias and differences in baseline characteristics. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify significant prognostic factors. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), which were evaluated with the Kaplan-Meier method.ResultsAfter propensity score matching, 805 pairs were selected. Patients with early-stage ER/PR-positive mucinous adenocarcinoma in the chemotherapy group had a better OS, but not BCSS, than those in the nonchemotherapy group after PSM (OS: p < 0.001; BCSS: p = 0.285). After stratifying by tumor size and lymph node status, adjuvant chemotherapy could significantly improve the OS of early-stage ER/PR-positive patients with tumors larger than 3 cm (p = 0.004) if they had negative lymph nodes (LNs). For patients positive LNs, the OS was significantly different between the chemotherapy group and the non-chemotherapy group when the tumors were larger than 1 cm (T = 1–2.9 cm, p = 0.006; T＞3 cm, p = 0.049, respectively).ConclusionAdjuvant chemotherapy maybe improves prognosis in patients with negative LNs and tumors larger than 3 cm, or patients with LNs metastasis and tumors larger than 1 cm. We suggest considering clinical characteristics meanwhile when deciding chemotherapy or not. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) are expected to confirm our results in the future.     

Prognostic implications of lobular breast cancer histology: New insights from a single hospital cross-sectional study and SEER data

BackgroundInvasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) is generally believed to have an increased risk for late relapse compared to invasive ductal breast cancer (IDC). However, the study most often referred to is a chemotherapy trial that mainly included node positive patients. We hypothesize that nodal status may influence the hazard of relapse since time of diagnosis differently in invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and ILC.MethodsPrimary operable breast cancer patients from our institution diagnosed between 2000 and 2009 were studied. Multivariable analysis and subgroup analyses were performed to assess whether ILC carries a different prognosis compared to IDC. SEER data were used for external validation.ResultsIn lymph node negative patients, ILC carries a better prognosis regarding distant metastasis free interval (DMFI) (HR 3.242 (1.380–7.614), p = 0.0069) with a trend towards improved breast cancer specific survival (BCSS), over the entire study frame (UZ Leuven data). In lymph node positive patients, both DMFI (HR 0.466 (0.309–0.703), p = 0.0003) and BCSS (HR 0.441 (0.247–0.788), p = 0.0057) are significantly worse for ILC, especially after longer follow-up (>4–5 years) (UZ Leuven data). Similar results were found in the SEER cohort. Results remained identical when excluding screen detected cases (data not shown).ConclusionThe prognostic impact of lobular histology not only depends on time since diagnosis but also on nodal status. The general believe that ILC have compromised late-term outcome compared to IDC seems untrue for the majority ( = node negative) of ILCs.     

Efficacy of Breast Conservation Therapy in Early Stage Bilateral Breast Cancer

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients with bilateral breast cancer as compared to unilateral breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Sixty patients with bilateral breast cancer (BBC) and 1,080 unilateral breast cancer (UBC) patients treated with breast conservation therapy from 1977 to 1994 were analyzed for outcome. Of the 60 bilateral patients, 44 were metachronous bilateral breast cancer patients (MBBC) and 16 were synchronous bilateral breast cancer patients (SBBC). The majority of patients received lumpectomy, axillary node dissection, and localized radiation therapy. Median tumor size was 1.4 cm for BBC and 1.5 cm for UBC patients. Median total dose to the tumor bed was 60 Gy for both unilateral and bilateral patients. Of the 44 MBBC patients, 14 received breast conservation for both the first and second lesions, while 30 received breast conservation for only the second metachronous lesion. Thus 58 lesions in 44 patients were treated with breast conservation therapy. Of the SBBC patients, 13 of 16 patients received breast-conserving therapy for both breasts, while 3 received a mastectomy for the second synchronous primary. Median follow-up was 50 months for SBBC patients, 45 months for MBBC patients, and 52 months for UBC patients. Local control and survival were analyzed in patients with SBBC, MBBC, and UBC. The interval to development of local recurrence and survival were calculated from the time of development of the second breast lesion in patients with MBBC. No differences were found for survival and failure-free survival in patients with SBBC, MBBC, or UBC. Five-year overall survival by lifetable analysis was 76% for SBBC, 78% for MBBC, and 87% for UBC patients (p = 0.32 by log-rank analysis). The 5-year failure-free survival was 79% for SBBC, 73% for MBBC, and 85% for UBC patients (p = 0.28 by log-rank analysis). No significant differences were seen for median age, tumor size, pathologic node status, tamoxifen use, chemotherapy use, or median total radiation dose for SBBC, MBBC, or UBC patients. A significant difference was found in the incidence of family history of breast cancer in patients with unilateral versus bilateral breast cancer (p = 0.028 by chi-square analysis). However, there was no difference in outcome of patients by family history of breast cancer. The local control was identical in both BBC and UBC patients, with a local failure rate of 3%. Therefore, breast conservation therapy in local-regional, early stage breast cancer is a rational and efficacious treatment modality for patients with SBBC, MBBC, and UBC.     

Comparison of CTS5 risk model and 21-gene recurrence score assay in large-scale breast cancer population and combination of CTS5 and recurrence score to develop a novel nomogram for prognosis prediction

BackgroundBreast cancer is the most common malignancy in women. Clinical models such as Oncotype DX recurrence score (RS) and Clinical Treatment Score post–5 years (CTS5) model for survival prediction are crucial for clinical practice. However, it remains unclear whether CTS5 or RS would be a more powerful clinical model for recurrence risk evaluation. Therefore, we conducted the present study to compare the performance of CTS5 risk model and RS on different recurrence evaluation. And we further integrated the two models into a novel nomogram to improve the power for prognosis prediction.MethodsFemale patients with invasive hormone receptor positive breast cancer in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database with RS data available were included. The clinicopathological data were directly extracted from SEER database. Participants were divided into three subsets according to recurrence timing (<36 months, between 36 and 60 months, and >60 months) for model evaluation. Survival receiver operating characteristic curve and C-index were calculated to evaluate discrimination. Calibration curve were used to visual inspection for calibration. Model comparison was assessed by net reclassification index (NRI) method. Nomogram prognostic model was developed with the combination of CTS5 score and RS and also included other critical clinicopathological parameters.ResultsIn total, 64044 breast cancer patients were enrolled for analysis. The number of patients with survival <36 months (early recurrence subset), 36–60 months (intermediate recurrence subset) and >60 months (late recurrence subset) were 64044, 36878 and 15926, respectively. For model discrimination, CTS5 model was superior to RS for overall survival (OS) prediction (likelihood ratio test P < 0 0.001). RS model showed better performance for breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) in late recurrence subsets and worse performance in early and intermediate recurrence subsets than CTS5 (likelihood ratio test P < 0 0.001). For calibration, CTS5 model was superior to RS model for OS, which overestimated the recurrence risk in low-risk subgroup. Both models overestimated the risk for BCSS. In either early/intermediate/late recurrence patient subsets, there was no significant difference in NRI between two models in terms of both BCSS and OS, indicating the two models had comparable prognostic value. The nomogram which combined these two models largely improved the discrimination and calibration power (C-index 0.70–0.72).ConclusionsOur study proved the CTS5 risk model had comparable prognostic value as RS in HR + breast cancer patients. And the novel nomogram model had better discrimination and calibration than both CTS5 and RS, and future large-scale clinical trials are warranted for further validation.     

The prognostic significance of metaplastic carcinoma of the breast (MCB) – A case controlled comparison study with infiltrating ductal carcinoma

PurposeMetaplastic carcinoma of the breast (MCB) is a rare histological subtype of breast cancer with an incidence of less than 0.1%–0.5%. Due to its rarity, the clinical characteristics and prognostic significance of MCB compared with other common breast cancers (like infiltrating ductal carcinoma [IDC], and infiltrating lobular carcinoma [ILC]) are not clear, and controversial among different reports.MethodsWe performed a collective comparison study of multi-institutional cases to evaluate the clinical characteristics and prognostic status of MCB to compare with IDC and ILC. A case control analysis was performed to minimize the bias from clinicopathologic factors between IDC and MCB. Disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between groups were compared.ResultsForty-five MCB patients were enrolled from the 4 medical centers and compared with 1777 IDC and 53 ILC patients from the CCH cancer registry database comprise the current study. Compared with IDC, MCB was associated with older age, larger tumor size, a lesser lymph node positive rate, a higher likelihood of distant metastasis, higher tumor grade, lower ER-positive tumor, and higher triple negative breast cancer subtype (TNBC). MCB was associated with worse OS (p = 0.031) than IDC, but no difference in DFS (p = 0.071); however, MCB was not statistically different from ILC in both DFS and OS (p = 0.289 and 0.132, respectively). Compared with the case-controlled IDC group, MCB patients had poorer OS (p = 0.040), but no difference in DFS (p = 0.439).ConclusionMCB is associated with poorer OS than IDC, and this was related to tumor behavior rather than clinicopathologic factors.     

Is breast conservation superior to mastectomy in early stage triple negative breast cancer?

PurposeCompare overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) outcomes of breast conservative therapy (BCT) and mastectomy in a large cohort of patients with early-stage triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), using a propensity score-based matching approach.MethodsSurveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to study the role of RT in early stage TNBC. Primary end points were OS and BCSS. Cox proportional hazard regression models and Kaplan-Meier plots were used to generate the desired outcomes. Propensity score matching was done to minimize bias.Results12,761 patients with T1-2N0M0 TNBC as their first malignancy were retrieved. Of these 7237 had lumpectomy with RT, and 5524 had mastectomy only. Age, race, marital status, tumor laterality, grade and stage, and receipt of chemotherapy were prognostic variables for OS and BCSS. Among 4848 matched subjects, the 5-year OS was significantly higher in patients with lumpectomy and RT (89%) compared to mastectomy alone (84.5%) (p-value <0.001). Similarly, BCSS was significantly higher in patients with lumpectomy and RT (93%) compared to mastectomy alone (91%) (p-value <0.001). On subgroup analysis, patients who are younger than 40 had similar survival outcomes after either mastectomy alone or lumpectomy with RT. However, those who are older than 60, have any grade or T stage had better survival outcomes with lumpectomy and RT.ConclusionsOverall, lumpectomy followed by RT is associated with better OS and BCSS compared to mastectomy in T1-2N0M0 TNBC patients. Further research is needed to determine the optimal treatment strategy for specific patient subgroups.     

Higher-risk breast cancer in women aged 80 and older: Exploring the effect of treatment on survival

BackgroundTo understand the association between various treatments and survival for older women with higher-risk breast cancer when controlling for patient and tumor factors.Materials and methodsWe conducted a retrospective, population-based study. Women aged 80 years or older and diagnosed between 2004 and 2017 with non-metastatic, higher-risk breast cancer were identified form the provincial cancer registry in Alberta, Canada. Higher-risk was defined as any of following: T3/4, node positive, human epidermal factor receptor-2 (Her2) positive or triple negative disease. Treatments were surgery, radiotherapy and systemic therapy (hormonal therapy, and/or chemotherapy and/or trastuzumab) or a combination of the previous. Cox regression models were used to examine the association between treatments and breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS).Results1369 patients were included. The median age was 84 years. 332 (24%) of women had T3-T4 tumors, 792 (58%) had nodal involvement, 130 (10%) had Her2 positive tumors, 124 (9%) had triple negative tumors. After a median follow-up of 35 months, 29.5% of patients died of breast cancer whereas 34.2% died from other causes. Patients had a lower adjusted hazard for BCSS if they had surgery (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.37 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.27, 0.51), or systemic therapy (HR = 0.75, 95%CI: 0.58, 0.98). Patients had an increased probability of breast cancer death in the first 5 years after diagnosis compared to death from other causes.ConclusionsSurgery and systemic therapy were associated with longer BCSS and OS. This suggests that maximizing treatments might benefit higher-risk patients.     

Survival in breast cancer patients with a delayed DIEP flap breast reconstruction after adjustment for socioeconomic status and comorbidity

PurposeOverall survival in breast cancer patients receiving a delayed deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction is better than in those without delayed breast reconstruction. This study aimed at determining the impact of socioeconomic status (SES) and comorbidity on these observations.Materials and methodsThis matched cohort study included all consecutive women undergoing a delayed DIEP flap reconstruction at Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden, between 1999 and 2013. Controls had not received any delayed breast reconstruction and were relapse-free after a corresponding follow-up interval. Matching was by year of and age at mastectomy, tumour stage and lymph node status. Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and socioeconomic data were obtained from national registers. Associations with breast cancer-specific (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) were investigated by Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis.ResultsWomen in the DIEP group (N = 254) more often continued education after primary school (88.6% versus 82.6%, P = 0.026), belonged to the high-income group (76.0% versus 63.1%, P < 0.001), were in a partnership (57.1% versus 55.7%, P = 0.024) and healthier (median CCI 1.00 (range 0–13) versus 2.00 (range 0–16), P = 0.021) than the control group (N = 729). After adjustment for tumour and treatment factors, SES and comorbidity, OS remained significantly better for the DIEP group than the control group (HR 2.27, 95% CI 1.44–3.55).ConclusionWomen with a delayed DIEP flap reconstruction are a subgroup of higher socioeconomic status and better health. Higher survival estimates for the DIEP group persisted after adjusting for those differences, suggesting the presence of further unmeasured covariates.     

Omitting radiation therapy in women with triple-negative breast cancer leads to worse breast cancer-specific survival

PurposeTo examine locoregional recurrence (LRR) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) or mastectomy (ME) with or without radiation therapy (RT) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).Material & MethodsWe identified non-metastatic TNBC cases from a single institution database. BCT, ME with RT (ME + RT) and ME only were compared with respect to LRR and BCSS. Cox regression models were used to analyze the association between prognostic factors and outcome.Results439 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 10.2 years (interquartile range 7.9; 12.4 years). Patients in the BCT (n = 239), ME + RT (n = 116) and ME only (n = 84) group differed with respect to age, pT, pN, lymphovascular invasion, lymph node dissection and chemotherapy administration. Ten-year LRR rates were seven percent, three percent and eight percent for the BCT, ME + RT and ME only group, respectively. pN was associated with LRR. In multivariable analysis LRR were significantly lower in the ME + RT group compared to the BCT and the ME only group (p 0.037 and 0.020, respectively).Ten year BCSS was 87%, 84% and 75% for the BCT, ME + RT and ME only group, respectively. pT, pN, lymph node dissection, lymphovascular invasion and the administration of chemotherapy were associated with BCSS. In multivariable analysis BCSS was significantly lower in the ME only group compared to the BCT group and the ME + RT group (p 0.047 and 0.003, respectively).ConclusionTNBC patients treated with ME without adjuvant RT showed significant lower BCSS compared to patients treated with BCT or ME + RT and significant more LRR compared to ME + RT when corrected for known clinicopathological prognostic factors.     

Effects of locoregional radiotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer

ObjectivesThis study aims to assess the clinical outcomes of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who underwent local radiation therapy (RT) for the primary site.Material and methodsBetween 2005 and 2013, we retrospectively evaluated patients with MBC who received breast or chest wall RT with or without regional lymph node irradiation.Results2761 patients with breast cancer were treated with RT. Of them, 125 women with stage IV breast carcinoma were included. The median follow-up was 15 months (ranging from 3.8 to 168 months), when 54.7% of the patients had died; local progression was observed in 22.8% of the patients. The mean overall survival (OS) and local progression free survival (LoPFS) were 23.4 ± 2.4 months and 45.1 ± 2.9 months, respectively. Three- and five-year overall survival rates were, respectively, 21.2% and 13.3%. Local progression free survival was the same, 67.3%, at three and five years, respectively. Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) (p = 0.015), number of metastatic sites (p = 0.031), RT dose (p = 0.0001) and hormone therapy (p = 0.0001) were confirmed as independent significant variables correlated with OS. The variables that were independently correlated with LoPFS were the number of previous chemotherapy lines (p = 0.038) and RT dose (p = 0.0001).ConclusionRT of the primary site in patients with MBC is well tolerated. The factors that presented positive impact on survival were good KPS, low disease burden (1–3 metastatic sites), and the use of hormone therapy.     

Receptor discordance and phenotype change in metastatic breast cancer

Backgroundchanges may occur in tumor phenotype and receptor status during the progression of breast cancer. Discordance between primary and metastases has implications for further treatment and prognosis.Methods185 patients confirmed breast cancer metastasis were retrospectively analyzed during 1999–2019. All the pathological assessments of receptors and phenotypes of both primaries and metastases were recorded.Resultsrates of receptor discordance were 18.65%, 30.57%, and 16.06% for ER, PR, and HER2, respectively and 31.62% for phenotype change. Patients with ER discordance experienced a worse OS and PMS, and those with ER loss had worse PMS compared with ER positive concordance. Patients with PR discordance experienced poorer OS and loss of PR positivity also had decreased OS and PMS when comparing with PR positive concordance. There was also significantly poorer PMS of hormon receptor (HR) discordance than HR positive concordance. In phenotype change, the luminal A type concordance group showed better PMS result.Conclusionsthis study demonstrated that discordance in subtype and receptor status between primary and metastatic lesions ultimately affects the survival and has a potential impact on treatment options.     

Locoregional therapy in de novo metastatic breast cancer: Systemic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundLocoregional therapy (LRT) in de novo metastatic disease is controversial with inconsistent results from randomized control trials (RCTs).MethodsRCTs comparing LRT and systemic therapy to standard therapy alone in de novo metastatic breast cancer were identified. Hazard ratios (HRs) and their associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed and pooled in a meta-analysis using generic inverse variance. Overall survival (OS) and time to locoregional progression data were extracted for the intention to treat (ITT) population. Data on OS for pre-specified subgroups defined by tumor subtype and by site of metastases were also extracted.ResultsAnalyses included 4 trials comprising 970 patients. LRT included standard surgery to the primary breast tumor in all studies, and adjuvant radiation per standard of care was required in 3 studies. Compared to standard treatment, LRT was not associated with improved OS in the ITT population (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.72–1.29, p = 0.81). However, LRT was associated with improved time to locoregional progression (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.14–0.95, p = 0.04). LRT was not associated with improved OS in any tumor subtypes, including hormone receptor positive (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.65–1.43), triple negative (HR 1.4, 95% CI 0.50–3.91) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive disease (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.68–1.28). Additionally, LRT did not improve OS in bone only disease (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.58–1.62) and in visceral disease (HR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.77–1.35). Our critical appraisal has identified some methodological problems in the design and conduct of the studies included that could affect the meta-analysis result.ConclusionsLRT in de novo metastatic breast cancer is not associated with improved OS. Results are consistent among different breast cancer subgroups. However, this conclusion should be interpreted with caution in view of the limitations identified in meta-analysis.     

Effectiveness and healthcare costs of eribulin versus capecitabine among metastatic breast cancer patients in Taiwan

ObjectiveTo compare the real-world effectiveness and costs of eribulin to those of capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes.MethodsThis study extracted data from the Health and Welfare Database in Taiwan to identify MBC patients, and then eribulin and capecitabine users were matched at a 1:1 ratio by age, residential region, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, and molecular subtype of BC cell. The overall survival (OS) and time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) curves were plotted using the Kaplan–Meier method. Healthcare utilization and costs between the two groups were compared.ResultsA total of 24,550 MBC patients were identified, and 298 patients were enrolled in each group after matching. The median OS was 11.8 months for eribulin (95%CI: 11.5–13.5 months) and 15.2 months for capecitabine (95%CI: 15.3–17.9 months; HR = 1.7, p < 0.0001). The median TTD was 4.0 months for eribulin and 6.6 months for capecitabine (HR = 1.6; p < 0.0001). No significant difference was found between the two groups in patients with >4 prior chemotherapy agents (OS: HR 1.1, 95%CI 0.8–1.5; TTD: HR 1.2, 95%CI 0.9–1.7). The total healthcare costs per patient during the treatment period were NT$580,523.8 for eribulin versus NT$497,223.8 for capecitabine (p < 0.0001), and total medication costs were NT$438,335.8 and NT$348,438.4 (p < 0.0001), respectively.ConclusionAlthough eribulin showed an attenuated effect in the real-world setting in Taiwan, it may serve as an alternative for capecitabine in a heavy pretreated population. The total healthcare and medication costs were found to be higher with eribulin treatment.     

Incidence,risk factors and survival of patients with brain metastases at initial metastatic breast cancer diagnosis in China

PurposeTo characterize the incidence, risk factors and survival of patients with brain metastases at initial diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in China.MethodsThe China National Cancer Center database was used to identify 2087 MBC patients diagnosed between 2003 and 2015. Clinicopathological features, treatment and survival information were extracted. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression were performed to determine factors predictive of brain metastases at MBC diagnosis and survival, respectively.ResultsBrain metastases occurred in ninety patients (4.3%) at MBC diagnosis, and in 27 patients (2.5%), 42 patients (7.2%) and 21 patients (5.2%) with hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HR + HER2-), HER2-positive and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), respectively. HER2-positive subtype (OR = 2.38; 95% CI 1.40–4.04; p < 0.0001), TNBC subtype (OR = 1.89; 95% CI 1.02–3.51; p = 0.005), and metastases to all three sites of bone, liver and lungs (OR = 3.23; 95% CI 1.52–6.87; p = 0.002) were shown to increase the risk of BM at MBC diagnosis. Median survival after BM was 23.7 months. First-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) improved survival compared to trastuzumab-based regimen (44.9 vs 35.4 months, p = 0.09). Factors that independently decreased BM death risk were ECOG<2, brain metastases only and multidisciplinary treatment.ConclusionHER2-positive and TNBC subtypes have a higher incidence of BM at initial MBC diagnosis. Brain screening might be considered in patients with HER2-positive disease at MBC diagnosis, and further prospective randomized study is warranted.     

Impact of Her‐2‐Targeted Therapy on Overall Survival in Patients With Her‐2 Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

Upon disease progression on trastuzumab‐based therapy, patients with HER‐2 positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) may switch to lapatinib or continue on trastuzumab. We aimed to assess the impact of both strategies on overall survival (OS) in all patients treated for HER‐2 positive MBC at the Medical University Vienna from 1999 until 2009. A total of 201 patients were identified from a breast cancer data base. Of these 115 (57.2%) received multiple lines of trastuzumab‐based therapy, whereas 58 (28.9%) were treated with a single line. A control group of 28 patients (13.9%) had never received trastuzumab as they were treated before 1999, when trastuzumab was registered. OS from diagnosis of metastatic disease was defined as primary study endpoint. Trastuzumab significantly prolonged OS in HER‐2 positive MBC (41 versus 13 months; p < 0.001). Administration of multiple lines further improved OS; this, however, did not reach statistical significance (47 versus 28 months; p = 0.069). Positive estrogen receptor (ER) status (HR 1.6; 95% CI 1.13–2.27) was associated with better outcome compared to negative estrogen receptor status (p = 0.02). Addition of lapatinib did not improve OS significantly in patients with prior trastuzumab‐based therapy (62 versus 47 months; p = n.s.). Patients receiving lapatinib after diagnosis of BM, however, experienced an improvement of OS (22 versus 5 months; p = 0.022). Trastuzumab improves OS in patients with HER‐2 positive MBC with further nonsignificant improvement when administered in multiple lines. Lapatinib did not further improve OS in the entire population; however, lapatinib might improve OS in patients with BM.     

Adjuvant treatment for triple negative breast cancer with residual tumor after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. A single institutional retrospective analysis

PurposeIncomplete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients is correlated to high risk of relapse. This study aimed to evaluate the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in TNBC with residual tumor after NACT.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the outcome of patients with TNBC with residual tumor at surgery after a neoadjuvant treatment, followed by either adjuvant chemotherapy or observation. Primary endpoints were Disease Free Survival (DFS) and Overall Survival (OS).ResultsBetween January 2000 and December 2016, 223 patients with early TNBC operated at the European Institute of Oncology were eligible. A total of 83.4 % of patients received adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. 90 patients received standard dose infusional regimens, while 96 patients (51.6 %) received oral metronomic chemotherapy. Adjusting the analysis by surgical stage and Ki67 value there was a benefit for DFS and OS in favor of the group that received postoperative chemotherapy (DFS-HR 0.58 p = 0.04; OS-HR 0.54, p = 0.02). At a subgroup analysis according to the different adjuvant treatments received, a benefit for metronomic chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy both for DFS (HR 0.46, p = 0.008) and OS (HR 0.45, p = 0.009) was reported.ConclusionOur retrospective analysis in a large cohort of TNBC patients with residual disease after NACT confirms the benefit of adding a postoperative treatment to reduce risk of relapse and death. Based on these results, we suggest that the adjuvant therapy based on metronomic cyclophosphamide and methotrexate deserves further investigation in this patients population.     

Thoracic sarcopenia predicts clinical outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: A 6-year cohort study

BackgroundThe relationship between thoracic sarcopenia and clinical outcomes in patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is unclear. This study aims to evaluate whether thoracic sarcopenia has a satisfactory prognostic effect on adverse outcomes after CABG.MethodsFrom December 2015 to May 2021, 338 patients who underwent isolated CABG at our institution were recruited in this study. Skeletal muscle area at T12 level acquired by chest computed tomography (CT) was normalized to assess thoracic sarcopenia. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the risk factors of postoperative complications and overall survival (OS).ResultsThe prevalence of thoracic sarcopenia in patients underwent CABG was 13.02%. The incidence of total major complication was significantly higher in thoracic sarcopenia group (81.8% vs 61.9%, p = 0.010). Thoracic sarcopenic patients also had longer postoperative hospital stays (p = 0.047), intensive care unit (ICU) stays (p = 0.001), higher costs (p = 0.001) and readmission rates within 30 days of discharge (18.2% vs 4.4%, p = 0.001). Patients without thoracic sarcopenia showed significantly higher OS at the 2-year follow-up period (93.9% vs 72.7%, p<0.001). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that thoracic sarcopenia was significantly and independently associated with postoperative complications and long-term OS after CABG.ConclusionThoracic sarcopenia is an effective clinical predictor of adverse postoperative complications and long-term OS in patients underwent CABG. Thoracic sarcopenia based on chest CT should be included in preoperative risk assessment of CABG.     

Phyllodes tumors of the breast: Adjuvant radiation therapy revisited

BackgroundPhyllodes tumors (PT) are rare entity and surgical resection is the cornerstone of treatment. No standard of care exists regarding adjuvant treatment especially radiation therapy (RT).Patients and methodsWe analyzed all patients with non-metastatic, resected phyllodes tumors who presented to our institution from January 2005 through December 2019. Primary study endpoints included local recurrence free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS).ResultsOne hundred and eight patients were analyzed (patients with incomplete treatment and follow up data were excluded). Fifty patients had benign phyllodes, 26 patients had borderline and 32 patients had malignant phyllodes. In the benign group, no significant difference in LRFS was observed between patients who received adjuvant RT (n = 3) and those who did not (5-year LRFS 100% vs. 85% respectively, p = 0.49). The 5 year OS for patients who received RT was 60% vs. 89% for those who did not (p 0.40). In the borderline/malignant group, adjuvant RT significantly improved five year LRFS (90% in the RT group vs. 42% in the no RT group, p = 0.005). The 5 year LRFS in patients treated with margin negative breast conserving surgery and RT was 100% vs. 34.3% in patients who did not receive RT (p 0.022). Patients treated with mastectomy and RT had a 5 year LRFS of 100% vs. 83% for patients who did not receive RT (p 0.24). On multivariate analysis, radiation therapy was independently associated with decreased hazard of local failure (HR 0.21, CI 0.05–0.89, p = 0.03). No difference in OS was found between the RT and no RT groups (5-year OS was 52% vs. 45% respectively, p 0.54).ConclusionThe results of the current study confirm the excellent prognosis of benign phyllodes tumors; warranting no further adjuvant treatment after margin-negative surgical resection. For patients with borderline/malignant phyllodes tumors, adjuvant radiation therapy significantly improved LRFS after margin negative wide local excision; however, patients treated with mastectomy did not attain the same benefit from adjuvant irradiation.