Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: Is there any difference for frail patients?

BackgroundOld age and frailty are predictors of early postoperative results after pancreatic surgery. We analysed the results of robotic and open pancreatoduodenectomy in elderly and frail patients.MethodsData from the local robotic pancreatoduodenectomy database were reviewed and matched with those from open operations during the same period (2014–2020). Both old age and frailty were used to determine any correlation with postoperative outcomes. Elderly patients were defined as patients aged 70 years or more, while frailty was classified according to the validated modified Frailty Index.ResultsA total of 118 pancreatoduodenectomies were included in the analysis: 65 (55.1%) robotic and 53 (44.9%) open. More than 50% of patients were frail. Overall, 7.6% of patients experienced grade IV Clavien-Dindo complications, and 3.4% died within 90 days after surgery. Frail patients experienced a similar rate of severe complications after robotic vs. open operations (5.3 vs. 11.6; p = 0.439) but earlier refeeding (3 days vs. 4 days; p = 0.006) and earlier drain removal (6 days vs. 7 days; p = 0.046) when operated on by a robotic approach. The oncological outcomes, including limphnodes retrieval, residual disease, recurrences, and survival, were not influenced by the surgical approach. Non-elderly patients also showed more benefits with the robotic approach (lower complication index, earlier refeeding, and drain removal).ConclusionsRobotic pancreatoduodenectomy is associated with risks of major complications that are comparable to those of open operation in frail patients. Some perioperative parameters (refeeding, drain removal) seem to favour robotics in frail patients and younger patients, although at the price of longer operating times.     

Minimally invasive surgical staging for early stage ovarian cancer: A long-term follow up

IntroductionThe standard treatment for epithelial early stage ovarian cancer (eEOC) includes laparotomic surgical staging, according to ESGO-ESMO guidelines. In the last decade, many investigators have assessed the safety and feasibility of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) staging in properly selected patients. However, survival data related to different surgical approaches (open versus MIS) are extremely limited. The aim of this study is to analyze the long-term oncological outcomes in eEOC patients treated with MIS.Materials and methodsThis is a multicenter observational retrospective study conducted in two tertiary oncological centers. We selected all consecutive women who underwent a laparoscopic or robotic staging for eEOC.ResultsFrom January 2008 to December 2016, 254 eEOC patients underwent a MIS staging (188 laparoscopic staging and 66 robotic staging). Overall, 18.1% of patients were upstaged due to pathological findings. A total of 203 (79.9%) patients received platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy.After a median follow-up of 61 months (range 13–118), 39 (15.3%) patients experienced recurrence. The 5-years progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival rates were 84.0% and 93.8%, respectively.In the univariate analysis, favorable variables influencing PFS were young age (≤45 years), non-serous histotype, tumor grade 1-2, and FIGO stage IA/IB. In the multivariate analysis, only grade 3 was shown to keep its negative independent prognostic value (HR = 3.47; p = 0.004), whereas FIGO stage ≥ IC showed a trend toward significance (HR = 1.75; p = 0.099).ConclusionThis retrospective study represents the longest follow-up of eEOC patients managed by MIS. The MIS is a valuable therapeutic option in appropriately selected patients, although a randomized controlled trial is needed.     

Pancreaticoduodenectomy in octogenarians: The importance of “biological age” on clinical outcomes

IntroductionWith the prolongation of life expectancy, an increasing number of elderly patients are evaluated for pancreatic surgery. However, the influence of increasing age on outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is still unclear, especially in octogenarians. Aim of this study is to evaluate the perioperative characteristics and outcomes of octogenarians undergoing PD.MethodsData for 812 patients undergoing PD between 2019 and 2020 in 10 referral centers in Italy were reviewed. Patients aged 80 years or older were matched based on nearest neighbor propensity scores in a 1:1 ratio to patients younger than 80 years. Propensity scores were calculated using 7 perioperative variables including gender, ASA score, neoadjuvant treatment (NAT), biliary stent positioning, type of surgical approach (open, laparoscopic, robot-assisted), associated vascular resections, type of lesion. Perioperative characteristics and short-term postoperative outcomes were compared before and after matching.ResultsOverall, 81 (10%) patients had 80 years or more. Before matching, octogenarians had a higher rate of ASA score≥ 3 (n = 35, 43.2% vs. n = 207, 28.3%; p = 0.005) and less frequently underwent NAT (n = 11, 13.6% vs. n = 213, 29.1%; p = 0.003). Matching was successfully performed for 70 octogenarians. After matching, no differences in preoperative and intraoperative characteristics were found. Postoperatively, ICU admission was more frequent in octogenarians (50% vs 30%; p = 0.01). Although in-hospital mortality was higher in octogenarians before matching (7.4% vs 2.9% in the younger cohort; p = 0.03), no difference was noted between the matched cohorts (p = 0.36). Postoperative morbidity was comparable between groups in the whole and selected populations. At the multivariate analysis, chronological age was not recognized as a prognostic factor for cumulative major complications, while ASA ≥3 was the only confirmed influencing feature (OR 2.98; 95%CI: 1.6–6.8; p = 0.009).ConclusioIn high-volume centers, PD in octogenarians shows similar outcomes than younger patients. Age itself should not be considered an exclusion criterion for PD, but a focused preoperative assessment is essential for adequate patient selection.     

Preoperative Pyuria Predicts for Intravesical Recurrence in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma of the Upper Urinary Tract After Radical Nephroureterectomy Without a History of Bladder Cancer

BackgroundWe assessed preoperative pyuria as a significant predictor of intravesical recurrence (IVR) in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU).Patients and MethodsWe evaluated the data from 268 patients with UTUC without a history of bladder cancer who had undergone RNU from 2006 to 2016 at 4 academic institutions. The associations between the clinical variables and the presence of pyuria were evaluated by univariate analysis. IVR was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis.ResultsThe median postoperative follow-up of patients with IVR-free survival was 29.1 months (interquartile range, 15.4-55.3 months). The rate of IVR was significantly greater in the patients with than in those without pyuria (P = .025). Multivariate analysis showed that preoperative pyuria (hazard ratio [HR], 1.70; P = .007), a ureteral tumor site (HR, 1.64; P = .012), and positive surgical margins (HR, 2.70; P = .013) were associated with a significantly increased risk of IVR. A postoperative risk stratification model using these factors showed significant differences among the 3 subgroups of patients with low, intermediate, and high risk. The 5-year IVR-free survival rates for the patients with low, intermediate, and high risk were 69.1%, 51.8%, and 18.8%, respectively (P = .004).ConclusionPreoperative pyuria, a ureteral tumor site, and positive surgical margins were associated with a significantly increased risk of IVR. Although external validation is required, the presence of preoperative pyuria could be a significant predictor of IVR in patients with UTUC after RNU.     

Preoperative Monocyte-to-lymphocyte Ratio Predicts for Intravesical Recurrence in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma of the Upper Urinary Tract After Radical Nephroureterectomy Without a History of Bladder Cancer

BackgroundThis study aimed to investigate the preoperative monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) as a biomarker for intravesical recurrence (IVR) in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for the first time.Patients and MethodsThis study involved the clinical data of 255 patients with UTUC without a history of bladder cancer who had undergone RNU from March 2004 to February 2019 at an academic institution. The associations between MLR and IVR were assessed with Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis.ResultsThe median follow-up was 43.93 months. Of the 255 patients, 37 developed IVR during the follow-up period. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that patients with high MLR (> 0.22) had poor IVR-free survival (P = .001); this prognostic value was in accordance with patients with high grade and more advanced stage UTUC. Cox regression preoperative models showed that ureteral tumor site (hazard ratio [HR], 2.784; P = .005), surgical approach (HR, 2.745; P = .008), and high MLR (HR, 4.085; P < .001) were an independent risk factor for IVR. These factors were used as a signature to establish a prognostic risk model, which revealed significant differences among the 3 subgroups of patients with low, intermediate, and high risk (P < .001).ConclusionUreteral tumor site, surgical approach, and preoperative MLR are significant predictors for IVR in patients with UTUC after RNU. MLR may become a useful biomarker to predict IVR in patients with UTUC after RNU.     

Introduction and First Clinical Application of a Simplified Immunohistochemical Validation System Confirms Prognostic Impact of KI-67 and CK20 for Stage T1 Urothelial Bladder Carcinoma: Single-Center Analysis of Eight Biomarkers in a Series of Three Hundred Six Patients

BackgroundBiomarkers could help to estimate the prognosis of solid tumors. One of the reasons that many immunohistochemical (IHC) markers are not used routinely is the high interobserver variability and various cutoff values. In the present study, we used a simplified IHC method with a group of 8 biomarkers in stage pT1 urothelial bladder carcinoma (UBC).Patients and MethodsIHC expression of CK20, KI-67, STK15, MUC7, periostin, fibronectin, survivin, and CXCR4 was assessed independently by 2 reviewers in a series of 306 stage pT1 UBC specimens from a single center in 10% steps from < 10% up to > 90%. A general center < 10% vs. ≥ 10% was set for further analysis for all markers. All patients initially underwent a bladder-sparing approach. Kaplan-Meier analyses and multivariate Cox regression analyses of recurrence-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were performed.ResultsA cutoff point ≥ 10% was shown to be valid and reliable for marker expression, with 96% interobserver agreement. Of the studied marker expressions, ≥ 10% for Ki-67 showed a statistically significant worse RFS (54% vs. 64%; P = .004), PFS (66% vs. 73%; P = .001), and CSS (71% vs. 77%; P = .015); ≥ 10% for CK20 showed a worse RFS (57% vs. 58%; P = .009). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed CK20 to be an independent prognostic factor for recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 2.08; confidence interval [95% CI]; 1.21-3.57; P = .008) and Ki-67 for progression (HR, 2.11; CI, 1.02-4.37; P = .045).ConclusionWe proposed and applied a simplified IHC evaluation that increases interobserver agreement and confirms the prognostic role of Ki-67 and CK20 for stage T1 UBC.     

Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy after previous trans-urethral resection of the prostate: Assessment of functional and oncological outcomes

Backgroundno data exist concerning functional and oncological outcomes of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP), in patients previously treated with trans-urethral resection of the prostate (p-TURP), for benign prostate obstruction. Our study addressed the impact of p-TURP on immediate and 12-months urinary continence recovery (UCR), as well as peri-operative outcomes and surgical margins, after RS-RARP.Methodsall patients treated with RS-RARP for prostate cancer at a single high-volume European institution, between 2010 and 2021, were identified and stratified according to p-TURP status. Logistic, Poisson and Cox regression models were performed.ResultsOf 1386 RS-RARP patients, 99 (7%) had history of p-TURP. Between p-TURP and no-TURP patients no differences were detected regarding both intra- and post-operative complications (p values = 0.9). The rates of immediate UCR were 40 vs 67% in p-TURP vs no-TURP patients (p < 0.001). At 12 months from RS-RARP, the rates of UCR were 68 vs 94% in p-TURP vs no-TURP patients (p < 0.001). At multivariable logistic and Cox regression models, p-TURP was independently associated, respectively, with lower immediate (odds ratio [OR]: 0.32, p < 0.001) and 12-months UCR (hazard ratio: 0.54, p < 0.001). At multivariable Poisson analyses, p-TURP predicted longer operative time (rate ratio: 1.08, p < 0.001) but not longer length of stay or time to catheter removal (p values > 0.05). Positive surgical margins rates were 23 vs 17% in p-TURP vs no-TURP patients (p = 0.1), which translated in a non-statistically significant multivariable OR of 1.14 (p = 0.6).Conclusionsp-TURP does not increase surgical morbidity but portends longer operative time and worse urinary continence after RS-RARP.     

Risk factors for local recurrence and long term survival after minimally invasive intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: Multivariate analysis in 161 patients

IntroductionIntersphincteric resection (ISR) is the ultimate anal-sparing technique as an alternative to abdominoperineal resection in selected patients. Oncological safety is still debated. This study analyses long-term oncological results and evaluates risk factors for local recurrence (LR) and overall survival (OS) after minimally-invasive ISR.Materials and methodsRetrospective single-center data were collected from a prospectively maintained colorectal database. A total of 161 patients underwent ISR between 2008 and 2018. OS and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis (log-rank test). Risk factors for OS and LRFS were assessed with Cox-regression analysis.ResultsMedian follow-up was 55 months. LR occurred in 18 patients. OS and LRFS rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 96%, 91%, and 80% and 96%, 89%, and 87%, respectively. Tumor size (p = 0.035) and clinical T-stage (p = 0.029) were risk factors for LRFS on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, tumor size (HR 2.546 (95% CI: 0.976–6.637); p = 0.056) and clinical T-stage (HR 3.296 (95% CI: 0.941–11.549); p = 0.062) were not significant. Preoperative CEA (p < 0.001), pathological T-stage (p = 0.033), pathological N-stage (p = 0.016) and adjuvant treatment (p = 0.008) were prognostic factors for OS on univariate analysis. Preoperative CEA (HR 4.453 (95% CI: 2.015–9.838); p < 0.001) was a prognostic factor on multivariate analysis.ConclusionsThis study confirms the oncological safety of minimally-invasive ISR for locally advanced low-lying rectal tumors when performed in experienced centers. Despite not a risk factor for LR, tumor size and, locally advanced T-stage with anterior involvement should be carefully evaluated for optimal surgical strategy. Preoperative CEA is a prognostic factor for OS.     

Impact of surgical approach and resection technique on the risk of Trifecta Failure after partial nephrectomy for highly complex renal masses

IntroductionWe aimed to compare the outcomes of open vs robotic partial nephrectomy (PN), focusing on predictors of Trifecta failure in patients with highly complex renal masses.Patients and methodsWe queried the prospectively collected database from the SIB International Consortium, including 507 consecutive patients with cT1-2N0M0 renal masses treated at 16 high-volume referral centres, to select those with highly complex (PADUA score ≥10) tumors undergoing PN. RT was classified as enucleation, enucleoresection or resection according to the SIB score. Trifecta was defined as achievement of negative surgical margins, no acute kidney injury and no Clavien-Dindo grade ≥2 postoperative surgical complications. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess independent predictors of Trifecta failure.Results113 patients were included. Patients undergoing open PN (n = 47, 41.6%) and robotic PN (n = 66, 58.4%) were comparable in baseline characteristics. RT was classified as enucleation, enucleoresection and resection in 46.9%, 34.0% and 19.1% of open PN, and in 50.0%, 40.9% and 9.1% of robotic PN (p = 0.28). Trifecta was achieved in significantly more patients after robotic PN (69.7% vs. 42.6%, p = 0.004). On multivariable analysis, surgical approach (open vs robotic, OR: 2.62; 95%CI: 1.11–6.15, p = 0.027) and tumor complexity (OR for each additional unit of the PADUA score: 2.27; 95%CI: 1.27–4.06, p = 0.006) were significant predictors of Trifecta failure, while RT was not. The study is limited by lack of randomization; as such, selection bias and confounding cannot be entirely ruled out.ConclusionsTumor complexity and surgical approach were independent predictors of Trifecta failure after PN for highly complex renal masses.     

Liver resection in elderly patients with extensive CRLM: Are we offering an adequate treatment? A propensity score matched analysis

BackgroundData on the management of elderly patients with extensive colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) are scarce and conflicting. This study assesses differences in management and long-term oncological outcomes between older and younger patients with CRLM and a high Tumour Burden Score (TBS).MethodsInternational multicentre retrospective study on patients with CRLM and a category 3 TBS, submitted to liver resection. Patients were divided into two groups according to their age (younger and older than 75) and were compared using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis and multivariable regression models. Differences in management and oncological outcomes including recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed.ResultsThe study included 386 patients, median follow-up was 48 months. The unmatched comparison revealed a higher ASA score (p = 0.035), less synchronous CRLM (47% vs 68%, p = 0.003), a lower median number of lesions (1 vs 3, p = 0.004) and less perioperative chemotherapy (CTx) (66% vs 88%, p < 0.001) in the elderly group.Despite the absence of CTx being an independent predictor of decreased RFS and OS (HR 0.760, p = 0.044 and HR 0.719, p = 0.049, respectively), the elderly group still received less CTx (OR 0.317, p = 0.001) than the younger group.After PSM (n = 100 patients), the two groups were comparable, however, CTx administration was still significantly lower in the elderly group.ConclusionLiver resection should be considered in patients aged 75 and older, even if they present with extensive liver disease. Despite CTx being associated with improved oncological outcomes, a large percentage of elderly patients with CRLM are undertreated.     

Outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors: A multicenter analysis

IntroductionMulticenter retrospective analysis of robotic partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors (i.e. 3 points for the ‘E’ domain of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score) was performed.Materials and methodsPatients’ demographics, tumor characteristics, perioperative, functional, pathological and oncological data were analyzed and compared with those of patients with exophytic and mesophytic masses (i.e. 1 and 2 points for the ‘E’ domain, respectively). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess variables for trifecta achievement (negative margin, no postoperative complications, and 90% estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] recovery).ResultsOverall, 147 patients were included in the study group. Patients with a completely endophytic mass had bigger tumors (mean 4.2 vs. 4.1 vs. 3.2 cm; p < 0.001) on preoperative imaging and higher overall R.E.N.A.L. score. There was no difference in mean operative time. Estimated blood loss was higher in the endophytic group (mean 177.75 vs. 185.5 vs. 130 ml; p = 0.001). Warm ischemia time was shorter for the exophytic group (median 16 vs. 21 vs. 22 min; p < 0.001). Postoperative complications were more frequent in patients with endophytic tumor (24.8% vs. 19.5% vs. 14.8%; p < 0.001). Six (4.5%) patients had positive surgical margins, there was no difference between groups. Trifecta was achieved in 44 patients in endophytic group (45.4 vs. 68.8 and 50.9%, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis for trifecta revealed that clinical tumor size (odds ratio: 0.667, 95% confidence interval: 0.56–0.79, p < 0.001) was only significant predictor for trifecta achievement.ConclusionsOur findings confirm that RAPN in case of completely endophytic renal masses can be performed with acceptable outcomes in centers with significant robotic expertise.     

Surgical outcomes of segmental ureteral resection with ureteroneocystostomy after major gynecologic surgery

IntroductionDescribing the surgical and oncological outcome of bladder-preserving ureter reconstruction (BPUR) with segmental ureteral resection after major gynecologic surgery.Matherials and methodsPatients with BPUR admitted at a single institution between March 2012 and July 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Surgical and oncological data were assessed.ResultsForty-six women with gynecologic tumors involving the ureter were treated with BPUR. R0 resection was achieved in 40/46 patients (86.9%), while pathologic margins were microscopically positive in 6 women (13.1%). Overall, 12 women (26.0%) received radiotherapy before surgery: among them, 8 patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Twenty-six women underwent BPUR during primary surgery, whereas 20 (43.4%) required BPUR upon recurrence. Twenty-six patients (56.2%) were found to have hydronephrosis at pre-operative workup. The psoas bladder hitch was the most common procedure performed for urinary reconstruction (63%) with respect to direct reimplantation (37%). Fourteen patients (14/46 = 30.4%) experienced urological complications. Urinary leakage occurred in 9 patients (19.5%), specifically: 5 uretero-vaginal fistula, 3 uroperitoneum, 1 uretero-enteral fistula. There were 3 cases (6.5%) of hydronephrosis at the side of ureteroneocystostomy and 2 cases (4.3%) of unilateral renal impairment requiring nephrectomy. At multivariate analysis only pre-operative radiotherapy (p = 0.047) and a history of pelvic irradiation (p = 0.025) were independently associated with an increased risk of developing severe urinary complications.ConclusionsBPUR is feasible in gynecologic cancer with invasion of the urinary tract. However, since a slight increase of post-operative urological complications was observed in the previously irradiated fields, a personalized surgical planning is recommended for these women in the next future.     

Laparoscopic versus open resection for rectal cancer: An individual patient data meta analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background and aimsThe role of laparoscopic rectal cancer resection remains controversial. Thus, we aimed to conduct a one-stage meta-analysis with reconstructed patient-level data using randomized trial data to compare long-term oncologic efficacy of laparoscopic and open surgical resection for rectal cancer.MethodsMedline, EMBASE and Scopus were searched for articles comparing laparoscopic with open surgery for rectal cancer. Primary outcome was disease free survival (DFS) while secondary outcome was overall survival (OS). One-stage meta-analysis was conducted using patient-level survival data reconstructed from Kaplan-Meier curves with Web Plot Digitizer. Shared-frailty and stratified Cox models were fitted to compare survival endpoints.ResultsSeven randomized trials involving 1767 laparoscopic and 1293 open resections for rectal cancer were included. There were no significant differences between both groups for DFS and OS with respective hazard ratio estimates of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.78–1.06, p = 0.241) and 0.86 (95% CI:0.73–1.02, p = 0.090). Sensitivity analysis for non-metastatic patients and patients with mid and lower rectal cancer showed no significant differences in OS and DFS between both surgical approaches. In the laparoscopic arm, improved DFS was noted for stage II (HR: 0.73, 95% CI:0.54–0.98, p = 0.036) and stage III rectal cancers (HR: 0.74, 95% CI:0.55–0.99, p = 0.041).ConclusionsThis meta-analysis concludes that laparoscopic rectal cancer resection does not compromise long-term oncologic outcomes compared with open surgery with potential survival benefits for a minimal access approach in patients with stage II and III rectal cancer.     

Minimally invasive surgery versus percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: Results from a high-volume liver surgery center in East Asia

Background & aimsThe outcomes of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) vs. percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in treating early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain inconclusive. This study thus aimed to compare the outcomes of both treatments for early-stage HCCs.MethodsThis retrospective study consecutively enrolled patients with newly diagnosed early-stage HCCs treated with MIS or percutaneous RFA between 2011 and 2018. Outcomes were compared between the MIS and RFA groups both before and after 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM).ResultsA total of 119 and 481 patients underwent MIS and percutaneous RFA, respectively. Patients undergoing percutaneous RFA exhibited older age (p = 0.007) and higher rates of Child–Pugh class B (p < 0.001) and multifocal disease (p < 0.001). The median overall survival (OS) was 73.7 months in the MIS group, which was significantly higher than that for the RFA group of 65.1 months (p = 0.003). 50% HCC recurrence after MIS was not reached. The mean recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 49.6 months for the MIS group, which was significantly higher than the RFA group of 41.3 months (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, age ≥65 (HR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.13–2.31, p = 0.009), RFA (HR: 2.21; 95% CI: 1.14–4.29, p = 0.019), and Child–Pugh class B (HR: 2.03; 95% CI: 1.29–3.21, p = 0.002) remained risk factors for OS, and RFA (HR: 2.18; 95% CI: 1.42–3.35; p < 0.001) remained a risk factor for RFS. After PSM, 103 patients were included in each group. No significant difference in OS was identified (p = 0.198), but RFS was higher in the MIS group than the RFA group (p = 0.003). Severe postoperative complications occurred at the same rate (1%) in both groups (p > 0.99).ConclusionAfter PSM, severe postoperative complication and OS rates were found to be comparable between the MIS and RFA groups, but RFS was higher in the MIS group than the RFA group, suggesting that MIS may have better outcomes for patients with early-stage HCC.     

Minimally invasive surgery in elderly patients with rectal cancer: An analysis of the Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit (BCCA)

BackgroundAdvanced age is associated with worse outcomes after open rectal cancer surgery. However, not much is known about outcomes of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in the elderly. The aim of this study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of MIS in elderly rectal cancer patients using the Bi-national Colorectal Cancer Audit (BCCA) data from Australia and New Zealand (ANZ).Methods3451 patients were included, divided into three groups: <50 years (n = 364), 50–74 years (n = 2157) and ≥75 years (n = 930). Propensity-score matching was performed for the elderly group analysis to correct for differences in baseline characteristics.ResultsMIS was performed in 52.9% of elderly patients, slightly lower than rates in <50 year and 50–74 year old groups (61% and 55.5%, respectively, p = 0.022). Elderly patients had more postoperative complications (p < 0.0001) and had a longer length of hospital stay (LOS; median 11 vs. 8 days for both other groups; p < 0.0001). Elderly patients had higher (y)pT-stages compared to both other groups (p < 0.0001) and were less likely to receive adjuvant therapy (p < 0.0001). Propensity-score matched analysis of the elderly group showed a higher rate of superficial wound dehiscence and a longer LOS after open surgery compared to MIS (10.3% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.030; 12 days vs. 9.5 days, p = 0.001, respectively), with comparable short-term oncological outcomes.ConclusionsMIS is performed in just over half of elderly rectal cancer patients who are selected for elective rectal resection surgery in ANZ. When performed in the elderly, MIS appears safe and is associated with fewer wound complications and a shorter LOS.     

Liver venous deprivation versus associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy for colo-rectal liver metastases: a comparison of early and late kinetic growth rates,and perioperative and oncological outcomes

BackgroundDifferent techniques have been developed to optimize the Future Liver Remnant (FLR). Associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) and liver venous deprivation (LVD) have shown the higher hypertrophy rates, but their place in clinical practice is still debated.MethodsThirty-two consecutive ALPPS and LVD procedures for CRLM performed between December 2015 and December 2019 were included. This retrospective study evaluated kinetic growth rates (KGR) as primary outcome, and perioperative and oncological outcomes as secondary endpoints.ResultsA total of 17 patients underwent LVD before surgery, whereas 15 underwent ALPPS. On early evaluation (7 vs 9 days, respectively), KGR did not differ between ALPPS and LVD cohort (0.8% per day vs 0.3% per day, p = 0.70; 23 cc/day vs 26 cc/day, p = 0.31). Late evaluation (21 vs 9 days) showed a KGR significantly decreased in the LVD group (0.6% per day vs 0.2% per day, p = 0.21; 20 cc/day vs 10 cc/day p = 0.02). Mean FLR-V increase was comparable in the two groups (60% vs 49%, p 0.32). Successful resection rate was 100% and 94% in LVD and ALPPS group, respectively. The hospital stay (p < 0.0001) and severe complications rate (p = 0.05) were lower after LVD. One and 3-years overall survival (OS) were 72,7% and 27,4% in the ALPSS group, versus 81,3% and 54,7% in LVD group (p = 0.10). The Median DFS was comparable between both techniques (6.1 months and 5.9 respectively, p = 0.66).ConclusionsLVD and ALPPS shows similar KGR during the early period following preparation as well as similar survival outcomes. Hospital stay and severe complications are lower after LVD.     

Real-world implementation of a geriatric-specific ERAS protocol in patients undergoing colonic cancer surgery

BackgroundThe aim of this single-center observational study was to evaluate the impact of implementing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols, combined with systematic geriatric assessment and support, on surgical and oncological outcomes in patients aged 70 or older undergoing colonic cancer surgery.MethodsTwo groups were formed from an actively maintained database from all patients undergoing laparoscopic colonic surgery for neoplasms during a defined period before (standard group) or after (ERAS group) the introduction of an ERAS program associated with systematic geriatric assessment. The primary outcome was postoperative 90-day morbidity. Secondary outcomes were total length of hospital stay, initiated and completed adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) rate, and 1-year mortality rate.ResultsA total of 266 patients (135 standard and 131 ERAS) were included in the study. Overall 90-day morbidity and mean hospital stay were significantly lower in the ERAS group than in the standard group (22.1% vs. 35.6%, p = 0.02; and 6.2 vs. 9.3 days, p < 0.01, respectively). There were no differences in readmission rates and anastomotic complications. AC was recommended in 114 patients. The rate of initiated treatment was comparable between the groups (66.6% vs. 77.7%, p = 0.69). The rate of completed AC was significantly higher in the ERAS group (50% vs. 20%, p < 0.01) with a lower toxicity rate (57.1% vs. 87.5%, p = 0.002). The 1-year mortality rate was higher in the standard group (7.4% vs. 0.8%, p < 0.01).ConclusionsThe combination of ERAS protocols and geriatric assessment and support reduces the overall morbidity rate and improves 12-month oncologic outcomes.     

Local resection versus radical surgery for parathyroid carcinoma: A National Cancer Database analysis

IntroductionParathyroid carcinoma (PC) is rare and often diagnosed incidentally after local resection (LR) for other indications. Although recommended treatment has traditionally been radical surgery (RS), more recent guidelines suggest that LR alone may be adequate. We sought to further investigate outcomes of RS versus LR for localized PC.Materials and methodsPC patients from 2004 to 2015 with localized disease were identified from the National Cancer Database, then stratified by surgical therapy: LR or RS. Demographic and clinicopathologic data were compared. Cox proportional hazard models were constructed to estimate associations of variables with overall survival (OS). OS was estimated from time of diagnosis using Kaplan-Meier curves.ResultsA total of 555 patients were included (LR = 522, RS = 33). The groups were comparable aside from LR patients having higher rates of unknown nodal status (66.9% versus 39.4%; p = 0.003). By multivariable analysis, RS did not have a significant association with OS (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.43, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) = 0.10, 1.83; p = 0.255), nor did positive nodal status (HR = 0.66, 95%CI = 0.09, 5.03; p = 0.692) and unknown nodal status (HR = 1.30, 95%CI = 0.78, 2.17; p = 0.311). There was no difference in OS between the LR and RS groups, with median survival not reached by either group at 10 years (median follow-up = 60.4 months; p = 0.20).ConclusionsThere was no difference in OS between LR and RS for localized PC. RS and nodal status may not impact survival as previously identified, and LR should remain a valid initial surgical approach. Future higher-powered studies are necessary to assess the effects of surgical approaches on morbidity and oncologic outcomes.     

The Effect of Salvage Radiation Therapy on Survival,Functional Outcomes,and Quality of Life in Men with Persistent Prostate-specific Antigen After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Which Patient Benefits More?

PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of salvage radiation therapy (sRT) on survival, functional outcomes, and quality of life in men with persistent prostate-specific antigen (PSA >0.1 ng/mL) after a robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and reveal subgroups that benefit more from sRT.Methods and MaterialsData of 3409 patients who underwent RARP was retrieved from a high-volume institute database, and 313 patients with persistent PSA were included in further analyses. Patients who received sRT and those who did not were compared after propensity score matching. Progression-free survival (PFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)-free, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival, as well as patient-reported outcomes were the endpoints. Multivariable Cox regression models were developed to reveal treatment effect sizes for the subgroups.ResultsThe overall persistent PSA rate was 9.2%, and the median follow-up time after RARP was 4.5 years (interquartile range, 2.7-7.9 years). The sRT was associated with improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.29; P < .001), ADT-free survival (HR: 0.34; P < .001), MFS (HR: 0.39; P = .001), cancer-specific survival (HR: 0.34; P = .03), and overall survival (HR: 0.24; P = .001). Positive surgical margins (HR: 0.26; P < .001 for ADT-free survival), advanced pathological T stage (HR: 0.24; P < .001 for PFS) and positive lymph nodes (HR: 0.15; P = .001 for MFS), and lower Gleason score (HR: 0.15; P = .001 for PFS) were associated with marked survival benefits of sRT. Bowel symptoms were observed more frequently in patients who had sRT with or without ADT compared with patients with persistent PSA but no sRT (34.3% vs 19.2%; P = .01). Early sRT (<6 months after surgery) was associated with bothering incontinence (P < .001) and bowel symptoms (P = .03).ConclusionsPersistent PSA after a radical prostatectomy is still a common challenge in the robotic surgery era. sRT provides clear survival benefits for all endpoints, especially with unfavorable locoregional factors but a low Gleason score.