Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism,Anno 2005

Pulmonary angiography is the gold standard for segmental pulmonary embolism (PE) but no longer for sub-segmental PE, because the inter-observer agreement for angiographically documented subsegmental PE is only 60%. Two non-invasive tools exclude PE with a negative predictive value of > 99%: a normal perfusion lung scan and a normal rapid ELISA VIDAS D-dimer test. The positive predictive value is 85 to 88% for a high probability ventilation-perfusion lung scan (VP-scan) and > 95% for helical spiral CT. The prevalence of PE in management studies of symptomatic patients with a non-diagnostic VP-scan is 20 to 24%. Helical spiral CT detects all clinically relevant PE and a large number of alternative diagnoses in symptomatic patients with a non-diagnostic VP-scan or a high probability VP-scan. Single-slice helical CT as the primary diagnostic test in patients with suspected PE in three retrospective studies and in two prospective management study indicate that the negative predictive value of a normal helical spiral CT, a negative compression ultrasonography of the legs (CUS) together with a low or intermediate pre-test clinical probability is > 99%. Therefore, helical spiral Ct can replace both the VP-scan and pulmonary angiography to safely rule in and out PE. The combination of clinical assessment, a rapid ELISA VIDAS D-dimer followed by CUS will reduce the need for helical spiral CT by 40 to 50%.     

Diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis: how many tests do we need?

The requirement for a safe diagnostic strategy should be based on an overall post-test incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) of less than 1% during 3 month follow-up. Compression ultrasonography (CUS) has a negative predictive value (NPV) of 97 to 98% indicating a post-CUS incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of 2 to 3%. A post-CUS DVT incidence of 3% implicates that 90 to 120 DVTs per 1 million inhabitants will be overlooked each year indicating the need to improve the diagnostic work-up of DVT as much as possible. The qualitative D-dimer test (SimpliRed) has a sensitivity of 82 to 89% and a negative predictive value of 94 to 95% indicating a 5 to 6% post-test incidence of DVT, which is not sensitive enough for venous thrombosis exclusion. The post-test DVT incidence could be reduced from 3.2% to 0.6% in one study and from 11% to 2% in another study by the combination of a normal CUS and low clinical score and from 4.5% to 1.6% by the combination of low clinical score and a negative SimpliRed test in one study. The combination of a negative CUS and a negative SimpliRed test reduced the post-test incidence of DVT from 2.6% to < 1% or even < 1% in two management studies without the need of a repeated CUS on the basis of which anticoagulant therapy can safely be withheld. The rapid quantitative turbidimetric D-dimer assay (Tinaquant) has a sensitivity and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 97.7% with a 2.3% post-test incidence of DVT. The combination of a normal Tinaquant D-Dimer test result plus a low to moderate clinical score reduces the post-test incidence of DVT from 2.3 to 0.6% without the need of CUS testing in 29% of patients with suspected DVT. The rapid ELISA VIDAS D-dimer assay has a sensitivity and NPV of 98.6 and 99.5% in two management studies for the exclusion of DVT irrespective of clinical score. The combination of a normal ELISA VIDAS D-Dimer test with clinical score assessment will reduce the post-test DVT incidence of less than 0.5% and the need for CUS testing by 40 to 50%. It is concluded that the sequential use of a rapid quantitative D-dimer test, clinical score and CUS appears to be safe and the most cost-effective diagnostic work-up of DVT.     

Diagnosis of Deep Vein Thrombosis: How Many Tests Do we Need ?

The requirement for a safe diagnostic strategy should be based on an overall post-test incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) of less than 1% during 3 month follow-up. Compression ultrasonography (CUS) has a negative predictive value (NPV) of 97 to 98% indicating a post-CUS incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of 2 to 3%. A post-CUS DVT incidence of 3% implicates that 90 to 120 DVTs per 1 million inhabitants will be overlooked each year indicating the need to improve the diagnostic work-up of DVT as much as possible. The qualitative D-dimer test (SimpliRed) has a sensitivity of 82 to 89% and a negative predictive value of 94 to 95% indicating a 5 to 6% post-test incidence of DVT, which is not sensitive enough for venous thrombosis exclusion. The post-test DVT incidence could be reduced from 3.2% to 0.6% in one study and from 11% to 2% in another study by the combination of a normal CUS and low clinical score and from 4,5% to 1.6% by the combination of low clinical score and a negative SimpliRed test in one study. The combination of a negative CUS and a negative SimpliRed test reduced the post-test incidence of DVT from 2.6% to < 1% or even < 1%o in two management studies without the need of a repeated CUS on the basis of which anticoagulant therapy can safely be withheld. The rapid quantitative turbidimetric D-dimer assay (Tinaquant) has a sensitivity and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 97.7% with a 2.3% post-test incidence of DVT. The combination of a normal Tinaquant D-Dimer test result plus a low to moderate clinical score reduces the post-test incidence of DVT from 2.3 to 0,6% without the need of CUS testing in 29% of patients with suspected DVT. The rapid ELISA VIDAS D-dimer assay has a sensitivity and NPV of 98,6 and 99.5% in two management studies for the exclusion of DVT irrespective of clinical score. The combination of a normal ELISA VIDAS D-Dimer test with clinical score assessment will reduce the post-test DVT incidence of less than 0.5% and the need for CUS testing by 40 to 50%. It is concluded that the sequential use of a rapid quantitative D-dimer test, clinical score and CUS appears to be safe and the most cost-effective diagnostic work-up of DVT.     

Current diagnostic techniques for pulmonary embolism

The diagnosis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) includes deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) and requires objective testing. The clinician uses a combination of risk factors and nonspecific clinical findings to identify patients who warrant such an evaluation. The recommended approach begins with ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) lung scans or lower extremity noninvasive studies by compression ultrasonography. Nondiagnostic V/Q scans or negative noninvasive studies require further testing. A high-probability V/Q scan or a positive noninvasive study warrant treatment. A normal V/Q scan excludes the diagnosis of PE. Helical computed tomography (CT) can diagnose PE of major vessels but is not sufficiently sensitive to exclude PE because of its poor sensitivity for subsegmental pulmonary vessels. Newer D-dimer assays have a high negative predictive value, but results vary with the specific assay and do not perform well in patients with cancer. Future studies are needed to validate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA).     

CT Venography and CT Angiography of the Pulmonary Arteries in Acute Pulmonary Embolism

OBJECTIVES: To determine the diagnostic value of CT venography after CT angiography of the pulmonary arteries using multislice helical CT in the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism. METHODS: Between September 1999 and April 2001 252 patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism were examined. CT angiography of the pulmonary arteries was followed by CT venography of the inferior vena cava, the iliac veins and the proximal femoral veins; after April 2000 the popliteal veins and the proximal lower leg veins were additionally investigated. The examinations were performed with a double detector and a multidetector scanner (Elscint Twin and GE Lightspeed). RESULTS: Pulmonary embolism was found in 79/252 patients (40 central and 39 segmental/subsegmental PE). In 38/40 patients with central PE and in 22/39 patients with segmental/subsegmental PE in CT venography a deep venous thrombosis was detected, in 1/79 patient a doubled inferior vena cava could be found. In 5 patients with thrombosis of the inferior vena cava a transjugular cava filter placement was performed. In 13/173 patients without pulmonary embolism CT venography showed deep venous thrombosis. CONCLUSION: CT venography of the lower extremities is a practical and efficient additional examination to CT angiography in clinical suspected pulmonary embolism. It can detect the causing venous thrombosis with a high sensitivity.     

Uses of different D-dimer levels can reduce the need for venous duplex scanning to rule out deep vein thrombosis in patients with symptomatic pulmonary embolism

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the prevalence and distribution of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients with symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) to establish a screening protocol to reduce unnecessary venous duplex scanning using different D-dimer level rather than single cutoff point of 0.5 microg/mL in patients with low and moderate pretest clinical probability (PTP). METHODS: The PTP score and D-dimer testing were used to evaluate 85 consecutive patients with symptomatically proven PE before venous duplex scanning. After calculating the PTP score, patients were divided into low (or=3 points) PTP groups. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis was used to determine the appropriate D-dimer cutoff point in low and moderate PTP, with a negative predictive value of >98%. RESULTS: The study enrolled 81 patients. The prevalence of DVT was 63%, with 27 patients (33%) classified as low, 38 (47%) as moderate, and 16 (20%) as high PTP. DVT was detected in nine patients (33%) in the low PTP group, in 27 (71%) in the moderate group, and in 15 (94%) in the high group. In the low PTP patients, the difference in the value of D-dimer assay between positive-scan and negative-scan patients was statistically significant (9.99 +/- 7.33 vs 3.46 +/- 4.20, respectively; P = .008). Conversely, no significant difference in the D-dimer assay value between positive and negative scan results was found in the moderate PTP patients. ROC curves analysis were used to select D-dimer cutoff points of 2.0 microg/mL for the low PTP group and 0.7 microg/mL for the moderate PTP groups. For both groups, D-dimer testing provided 100% sensitivity and 100% negative predictive value in the diagnosis of DVT. In the low PTP group, specificity increased from 33% to 67% (P = .046). In the moderate PTP group, however, the determined D-dimer level did not improve the specificity. Overall, venous duplex scanning could have been reduced by 17% (14/81) by using different D-dimer cutoff points. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of specific D-dimer level and clinical probability score is most effective in the low PTP patients in excluding DVT. In the moderate PTP group, however, the recommended cutoff point of 0.5 microg/mL may be preferable. These results show that a different D-dimer level is more useful than single cutoff point of 0.5 microg/mL in excluding DVT in established PE patients.     

Role of spiral volumetric computed tomographic scanning in the assessment of patients with clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism and an abnormal ventilation/perfusion lung scan.

BACKGROUND: A study was carried out to evaluate the potential place of spiral volumetric computed tomography (SVCT) in the diagnostic strategy for pulmonary embolism. METHODS: In a prospective study 249 patients with clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism were evaluated with various imaging techniques. In all patients a ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scan was performed. Seventy seven patients with an abnormal V/Q scan underwent SVCT. Pulmonary angiography was then performed in all 42 patients with a non-diagnostic V/Q scan and in three patients with a high probability V/Q scan without emboli on the SVCT scan. Patients with an abnormal perfusion scan also underwent ultrasonography of the legs for the detection of deep vein thrombosis. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy two patients (69%) had a normal V/Q scan. Forty two patients (17%) had a non-diagnostic V/Q scan, and in five of these patients pulmonary emboli were found both by SVCT and pulmonary angiography. In one patient, although SVCT showed no emboli, the angiogram was positive for pulmonary embolism. In one of the 42 patients the SVCT scan showed an embolus which was not confirmed by pulmonary angiography. The other 35 patients showed no sign of emboli. Thirty five patients (14%) had a high probability V/Q scan, and in 32 patients emboli were seen on SVCT images. Two patients had both a negative SVCT scan and a negative pulmonary angiogram. In one who had an inconclusive SVCT scan pulmonary angiography was positive. The sensitivity for pulmonary embolism was 95% and the specificity 97%; the positive and negative predicted values of SVCT were 97% and 97%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: SVCT is a relatively noninvasive test for pulmonary embolism which is both sensitive and specific and which may serve as an alternative to ventilation scintigraphy and possibly to pulmonary angiography in the diagnostic strategy for pulmonary embolism.     

Prospective evaluation of a screening protocol to exclude deep vein thrombosis on the basis of a combination of quantitative D-dimer testing and pretest clinical probability score

BACKGROUND: Clinical signs and symptoms such as swelling, pain, and redness are unreliable markers of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Because of this venous duplex scanning (VDS) has been heavily used in DVT detection. The purpose of this study was to determine if a combination of D-dimer testing and pretest clinical score could reduce the use of VDS in symptomatic patients with suspected DVT. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred seventy-four consecutive patients with suspected DVT were prospectively evaluated using pretest clinical probability (PCP) score and D-dimer testing before VDS. After calculating clinical probability scores developed by Wells and associates, patients were divided into low risk (or=3 points) PCP. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-eight patients were enrolled. The prevalence of DVT in this study was 37%. Thirty-eight patients (24%) were classified as low risk, 64 (41%) as moderate risk, and 56 (35%) as high risk PCP. DVT was identified in only one patient (2.6%) with low risk PCP. In contrast, DVT was found in 22 (34%) with moderate risk, and 35 (63%) with high risk PCP. In the high and moderate risk PCP groups, positive scan patients had a markedly higher value of D-dimer assay than negative scan patients (p=0.0001 and p=0.0057, respectively). In the low risk PCP patients, D-dimer testing provided 100% sensitivity, 46% specificity, 4.8% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value in the diagnosis of DVT. Similarly, in the moderate risk PCP, the D-dimer testing showed 100% sensitivity, 45% specificity, 49% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value. In the high risk group, D-dimer testing achieved 100% sensitivity, 57% specificity, 80% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value in the diagnosis of DVT. These results suggested that 36 of 158 patients who had a non-high PCP (low and moderate PCP) and a normal D-dimer concentration were considered to have no additional investigation, so VDS could have been reduced by 23% (36/158). CONCLUSIONS: A combination of D-dimer testing and clinical probability score may be effective in avoiding unnecessary VDS in suspected symptomatic DVT in the low and moderate PCP patients. The need for VDS could be reduced by 23% despite a relatively high prevalence of DVT.     

Usefulness of D-dimer, blood gas, and respiratory rate measurements for excluding pulmonary embolism

BACKGROUND: A study was undertaken to assess the usefulness of the SimpliRED D-dimer test, arterial oxygen tension, and respiratory rate measurement for excluding pulmonary embolism (PE) and venous thromboembolism (VTE). METHODS: Lung scans were performed in 517 consecutive medical inpatients with suspected acute PE over a one year period. Predetermined end points for objectively diagnosed PE in order of precedence were (1) a post mortem diagnosis, (2) a positive pulmonary angiogram, (3) a high probability ventilation perfusion lung scan when the pretest probability was also high, and (4) the unanimous opinion of an adjudication committee. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was diagnosed by standard ultrasound and venography. RESULTS: A total of 40 cases of PE and 37 cases of DVT were objectively diagnosed. The predictive value of a negative SimpliRED test for excluding objectively diagnosed PE was 0.99 (error rate 2/249), that of PaO2 of > or = 80 mm Hg (10.7 kPa) was 0.97 (error rate 5/160), and that of a respiratory rate of < or = 20/min was 0.95 (error rate 14/308). The best combination of findings for excluding PE was a negative SimpliRED test and PaO2 > or = 80 mm Hg, which gave a predictive value of 1.0 (error rate 0/93). The predictive value of a negative SimpliRED test for excluding VTE was 0.98 (error rate 5/249). CONCLUSIONS: All three of these observations are helpful in excluding PE. When any two parameters were normal, PE was very unlikely. In patients with a negative SimpliRED test and PaO2 of > or = 80 mm Hg a lung scan is usually unnecessary. Application of this approach for triage in the preliminary assessment of suspected PE could lead to a reduced rate of false positive diagnoses and considerable resource savings.     

Normal D-dimer levels do not exclude thrombotic complications in trauma patients

BACKGROUND: Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) are common complications in trauma patients. These diagnoses can be difficult and expensive to make. Recent studies report that a negative D-dimer test excludes thrombotic complications. We questioned the predictive value of a D-dimer test to exclude DVT and PE. METHODS: Adult trauma patients admitted March 1999 to March 2001, with an Injury Severity Score > or =9 and expected length of stay >3 days, were approached for enrollment. Bilateral lower extremity duplex ultrasounds and d-dimer levels were performed within 36 hours of admission, day 3-4, day 7, and weekly until discharge. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were diagnosed with DVTs, with 18 DVTs detected within the first week of admission. Five DVT patients had normal D-dimer levels. One of three PE patients tested had a normal D-dimer level. The false negative rate for DVT by d-dimer assay was 24%, and the sensitivity was 76%. The negative predictive value for D-dimers was 92%. All false negative d-dimer tests occurred in patients diagnosed with DVT or PE within the 4 days after admission. CONCLUSION: In the early postinjury phase, a negative d-dimer test does not exclude DVT or PE. However, the negative predictive value of a D-dimer test after the first 4 days from admission rose to 100%. Patients with clinical signs and symptoms of DVT or PE in the immediate postinjury phase should undergo further screening to exclude thromboembolic complications.     

双源CT肺灌注成像诊断肺栓塞

目的探讨双源CT肺动脉造影(CTPA)结合双能量肺灌注成像(DEPI)诊断肺栓塞的价值。方法选取肺栓塞患者17例,应用双源CT行平扫,以双能量扫描模式进行增强扫描,重建出3组图像,分别行CTPA及DEPI,对CTPA所示段及亚段肺血管内充盈缺损的位置、数目、形态与DEPI图像进行对比。结果当肺段、亚段肺血管呈完全充盈缺损(完全栓塞)时,相应的DEPI图像主要以肺段或亚段分布的灌注缺损为主;而部分充盈缺损(部分栓塞)时,DEPI图像以不均匀灌注缺损为主。DEPI显示6处肺段区灌注缺损而CTPA未见栓子。结论 DEPI与CTPA相结合,可为诊断肺栓塞提供更多信息。     

Diagnosis of posttraumatic pulmonary embolism: is chest computed tomographic angiography acceptable?

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary angiography (PA-gram) has long been the accepted criterion standard for diagnosing pulmonary embolism (PE). Computed tomographic angiography has recently been advocated as an equivalent alternative to PA-gram. CT angiography is known to be insensitive for peripheral (segmental and subsegmental) emboli. We have previously found that a significant number of posttraumatic PEs occur early. We therefore hypothesized that because of the fragmentation of these early (soft) clots, posttraumatic PEs would be found disproportionately in the lung periphery. METHODS: Trauma patients with PE confirmed by PA-gram were identified from our trauma database and medical records. PA-grams and reports were re-reviewed and the location of all emboli was documented. RESULTS: We identified 45 patients, with an average age of 46 +/- 19 years; two thirds of the patients were men and 82% had a blunt mechanism of injury. Patients had PE diagnosed between days 0 and 57. Overall, PE was confined to segmental or smaller vessels in 27 (60%) patients and to subsegmental vessels in 7 (16%) patients. Twelve patients (27%) had a PE within the first 4 days. Furthermore, 32 patients (71%) had unilateral clot and 22 patients (48.9%) had clot confined to one region. CONCLUSION: PE frequently occurs soon after injury. The majority of PEs after trauma are found peripherally (in segmental or subsegmental vessels). Right/left pulmonary artery embolisms are likely to be found only later in a trauma patient's course. Any diagnostic study used to diagnose pulmonary embolism in trauma patients must have sufficient resolution capacity to reliably detect segmental and subsegmental clot. A diagnostic modality such as CT scanning that is insensitive to peripheral embolisms may miss a significant number of posttraumatic PEs.     

Probability Scores and Diagnostic Algorithms in Pulmonary Embolism: Are They Followed in Clinical Practice?

IntroductionClinical probability scores (CPS) determine the pre-test probability of pulmonary embolism (PE) and assess the need for the tests required in these patients. Our objective is to investigate if PE is diagnosed according to clinical practice guidelines.Materials and methodsRetrospective study of clinically suspected PE in the emergency department between January 2010 and December 2012. A D-dimer value ≥500 ng/ml was considered positive. PE was diagnosed on the basis of the multislice computed tomography angiography and, to a lesser extent, with other imaging techniques. The CPS used was the revised Geneva scoring system.ResultsThere were 3924 cases of suspected PE (56% female). Diagnosis was determined in 360 patients (9.2%) and the incidence was 30.6 cases per 100 000 inhabitants/year. Sensitivity and the negative predictive value of the D-dimer test were 98.7% and 99.2% respectively. CPS was calculated in only 24 cases (0.6%) and diagnostic algorithms were not followed in 2125 patients (54.2%): in 682 (17.4%) because clinical probability could not be estimated and in 482 (37.6%), 852 (46.4%) and 109 (87.9%) with low, intermediate and high clinical probability, respectively, because the diagnostic algorithms for these probabilities were not applied.ConclusionsCPS are rarely calculated in the diagnosis of PE and the diagnostic algorithm is rarely used in clinical practice. This may result in procedures with potential significant side effects being unnecessarily performed or a high risk of underdiagnosis.     

USE OF SPIRAL COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY IN LIEU OF ANGIOGRAPHY FOR PREOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT OF LIVING RENAL DONORS

PURPOSE: We evaluate whether spiral computerized tomography (CT) can be used in lieu of renal angiography for preoperative assessment of living renal donors, with special attention to multiplicity of renal vasculature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 47 living renal donor candidates were evaluated with spiral CT and all but 2 underwent donor nephrectomy. Patients were divided into early and late groups because there was a learning curve with spiral CT. In the early group 18 donors underwent renal angiography as well as spiral CT and 10 underwent nephrectomy after spiral CT only. In the late group 5 had dual radiographic evaluation for ambiguities in spiral CT interpretation and 12 underwent nephrectomy after spiral CT only. Spiral CT was performed and interpreted blind to angiographic results, and vice versa. RESULTS: Spiral CT identified 50 of 52 renal arteries (96%) found at surgery overall and 23 of 25 (92%) found at surgery after spiral CT only. Two accessory arteries were missed in the 10 early group donors evaluated with spiral CT only, yielding an early negative predictive value of 80%. Renal angiography identified another accessory artery missed by spiral CT in the early group. All 3 missed vessels were identified retrospectively. No arteries found at surgery were missed in the late group (negative predictive value 100%), although there were 2 false-positive results detected by spiral CT relative to renal angiography in 1 candidate renal unit. Overall accuracy to predict early renal artery division relative to surgical findings was 93% for spiral CT and 91% for renal angiography. However, early renal artery division was clinically significant for only 1 of 11 vessels found at surgery. Spiral CT demonstrated 4 anomalous venous returns and renal angiography identified none. However, spiral CT missed 2 accessory veins and identified only 1 of 2 fibromuscular dysplasia cases. Total cost for spiral CT and renal angiography was $886 and $2,905, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Spiral CT is a reasonably good alternative to renal angiography for living renal donor assessment but there is a profound learning curve for performance and interpretation. Renal angiography is still the gold standard with respect to the identification of arterial multiplicity and fibromuscular dysplasia, and it should be used adjunctively in cases with spiral CT ambiguity. Neither spiral CT nor renal angiography is ideal for the assessment of early renal artery division which is seldom an issue. The benefits of spiral CT over renal angiography are potentially lower morbidity, improved donor convenience and reduced cost.     

Quantification of carotid stenoses using 3D morphometer, CT angiography and conventional angiography

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to compare the performances of 3D morphometer (M3D) regarding the quantification of extracranial carotid stenoses with selective 2D conventional angiography (reference technique) and spiral CT scan. METHODS: It is a prospective study, including 15 patients (mean age 75) presenting a symptomatic carotid lesion detected via duplex Doppler to be operated. Patients had to hold their breath for 20 seconds. Twenty-nine carotid bifurcations were studied by means of M3D and 2D conventional angiography (15 patients). Only 10 patients (19 bifurcations) underwent a CT scan. The measures were performed on a visual display unit by measuring the pixels as per the NASCET technique. Diameters (MIP technique) and surfaces (reformated axial slices) were measured. RESULTS: With MIP technique, a good correlation was found 20 times in 29 (69%) (overestimation: n=8/29) between M3D and angiography, but only in 9 of 19 cases (47%) between CT scan and angiography. Unlike with M3D, the slices re-oriented with CT scan gave better correlations: 15 times in 19 (79%). With the CT scan, the measures were impossible 8 times on MIP technique, and twice on reformated slices for calcified tight stenoses. Therefore, the quantification by means of spiral CT scan is easier by planimetry on slices. CONCLUSIONS: The reliability of these 3D explorations regarding quantification remains uncertain. The use of a morphometer, provided that technical adaptations are made, could replace selective sequences in multiple incidences that become accessible in the post-treatment period, with an acquisition field larger than the one of the CT scan.     

The value of rapid D-dimer testing combined with structured clinical evaluation for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis.

PURPOSE: Large studies have shown that most cases referred for duplex sonography for suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) have normal scan results. For medical and economic reasons, a preselection procedure, which allows the detection of true-negative cases before duplex scanning, is required; this procedure should be characterized by a high sensitivity and a high negative predictive value. METHODS: In 343 patients (398 lower extremities) with suspected DVT, the DVT probability was clinically assessed, and a whole blood D-dimer agglutination test and a duplex scan were performed. The diagnostic sensitivities of the D-dimer test alone, a high clinical DVT probability alone, and the combination of both were evaluated. RESULTS: The sensitivity values for the D-dimer test to diagnose proximal and distal DVTs were 88.7% and 80.9%, the negative predictive values (NPV) were 96.3% and 97.9%, and the specificity and the positive predictive value (PPV) were 54.8% and 49.6% and 26.6% and 8.2%, respectively. The sensitivities of the clinical DVT probability assessment for the diagnosis of proximal and distal DVTs were 83.9% and 66.7%, respectively; the corresponding NPVs were 94.9% and 96.5%, respectively. The specificity was 56.1% and 50.8%, and the PPVs were 26.1% and 7.0%, respectively. The combined use of the results of the clinical probability assessment and the D-dimer test resulted in sensitivities for proximal and distal DVTs of 98.4% and 90.5%, NPVs of 99.3% and 98.6%, a specificity of 43.4% and 38.4%, and PPVs of 24. 3% and 7.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The combined use of a clinical DVT probability assessment scheme and the D-dimer test largely avoids false negative results, has a high sensitivity and NPV, helps to reduce the costs of DVT diagnosis, and may, in the future, be useful as a preselection procedure before duplex sonography.     

Bedeutung des CRP-Werts für die D-Dimer-Testung in der internistischen Notaufnahme

Background

D-dimer testing is perhaps the most often used diagnostic tool for exclusion of venous thromboembolism. A negative D-dimer value combined with a low pretest probability safely rules out acute pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis (PE/DVT) in outpatients. Elevated D-dimer levels, however, are frequently observed in patients with systemic inflammation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of C-reactive protein (CRP) on the performance of D-dimer testing in ruling out PE/DVT.

Methods

In a retrospective cohort of outpatients (n?=?1031) presenting to our emergency department with suspected PE/DVT, D-dimer and hsCRP values were determined. After dividing the patients in CRP groups (0.5–2.4, 2.5–4.4, 4.5–6.4, ≥?6.5 mg/dl), the mean D-dimer level, the proportion of patients with positive D-dimer test results, and the number-needed-to-test (NNT) were analyzed.

Results

D-dimer and CRP levels showed a significant correlation (r?=?0.520, p?Conclusion For a CRP value up to 4.4 mg/dl, D-dimer testing appears to be suitable to rule out acute PE/DVT. When CRP values exceed 6.5 mg/dl, D-dimer is predominantly positive and therefore of limited clinical value when the conventional cut off is used (相似文献   

Detection of Pulmonary Embolism in the Postoperative Orthopedic Patient Using Spiral CT Scans

Orthopedic surgery is associated with a significant risk of postoperative pulmonary embolism (PE) and/or deep vein thrombosis (DVT). This study was performed to compare the clinical presentations of a suspected versus a documented PE/DVT and to determine the actual incidence of PE/DVT in the post-operative orthopedic patient in whom CT was ordered. All 695 patients at our institution who had a postoperative spiral CT to rule out PE/DVT from March 2004 to February 2006 were evaluated and information regarding their surgical procedure, risk factors, presenting symptoms, location of PE/DVT, and anticoagulation were assessed. Statistical analysis was performed using an independent samples t test with a two-tailed p value to examine significant associations between the patient variables and CT scans positive for PE. Logistic regression models were used to determine which variables appeared to be significant predictors of a positive chest CT. Of 32,854 patients admitted for same day surgery across all services, 695 (2.1%) had a postoperative spiral CT based on specific clinical guidelines. The incidence of a positive scan was 27.8% (193/695). Of these, 155 (22.3%) scans were positive for PE only, 24 (3.5%) for PE and DVT, and 14 (2.0%) for DVT only. The most common presenting symptoms were tachycardia (56%, 393/695), low oxygen saturation (48%, 336/695), and shortness of breath (19.6%, 136/695). Symptoms significantly associated with DVT were syncope and chest pain. A past medical history of PE/DVT was the only significant predictor of a positive scan. Patients who have a history of thromboembolic disease should be carefully monitored in the postoperative setting.     

螺旋CT增强扫描在诊断和治疗肺动脉栓塞中的应用

目的 评价螺旋CT在诊断和治疗肺动脉栓塞（肺栓塞）中的作用。方法 对16例（年龄35－74岁）行螺旋CT检查的肺栓塞病人进行回顾性分析。使用PQ6000型单层螺旋CT机,连续容积增强扫描。结果 共计分析176支肺动脉分支,受累89支,占50．2％;双侧下叶主支受累最多（达31．5％）;累及左、右肺动脉主干者为16％,累及肺叶以下分支达84％,未见累及主肺动脉的病例。肺动脉栓塞螺旋CT增强扫描的直接征象为肺动脉腔内偏心性、类圆形充盈缺损,附壁性类环形充盈缺损,管腔闭塞,血栓位于管腔中央的“轨道症”;并存的间接征象包括主肺动脉增宽、局限性肺纹理稀疏、肺梗死和胸腔积液。结论 在肺动脉栓塞的诊断,螺旋CT增强扫描是一种有效的无创性检查手段,且安全、快速。在肺栓塞的定性定量诊断和指导选择治疗方法上,可以起到重要作用。     

The correlation of the D-dimer test and biphasic computed tomography with mesenteric computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischemia

Background

Early diagnosis is the main factor to improve the outcome of acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI). The goal of this study was to assess the correlation of the D-dimer test and biphasic computed tomography (CT) with mesenteric CT angiography for the diagnosis of AMI.

Methods

Selected consecutive patients with a clinical suspicion of AMI were admitted to the study. Blood samples were taken before biphasic CT with mesenteric CT angiography examination.

Results

The sensitivity and specificity values of biphasic CT with mesenteric CT angiography were 92.9% and 89.5%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of D-dimer testing for the diagnosis of AMI were 94.7% and 78.6%, respectively. D-dimer levels higher than 3.17 μg fibrinogen equivalent units/mL were more specific (P < .0001) and acted similarly to the biphasic CT with mesenteric CT angiography in the diagnosis of AMI.

Conclusions

In the setting of early diagnosis of AMI, the D-dimer test may improve our ability to diagnose patients in whom we cannot use multidetector row CT with CT angiography.