Simultaneous transplant nephrectomy and ipsilateral second graft retransplantation

Six cases of simultaneous transplant nephrectomy and retransplantation in the ipsilateral iliac fossa are presented. All primary grafts were lost due to chronic rejection. Patients were followed from forty-one to one hundred months after the second graft transplant. The sources for all grafts were either living related donors or cadavers. Graft nephrectomy was performed through the previous lower quadrant incision; the arterial and venous stumps of the primary grafts were used when possible. In all cases continuity of the urinary tract was reestablished with a Politano-Leadbetter ureteroneocystostomy. There appears to be no increased morbidity in any of these 6 cases, and the survival rate of the second graft is comparable to that of transplantation into the contralateral virginal fossa. Advantages of the simultaneous procedure are discussed.     

Is lymphocele in renal transplantation an avoidable complication?

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the impact of surgery in the incidence of lymphocele after kidney transplantation (KTx). METHODS: A prospective randomized study was conducted during a 6-year period on a group of patients undergoing KTx and operated on by the same surgeon (CVS). A total of 280 patients undergoing KTx were randomly allocated into two groups: (1) group C (control group) was 140 patients who were submitted to KTx with standard technique: implantation of the kidney in the controlateral iliac fossa with vascular anastomoses on the external iliac vessels; and (2) group M (modified technique group) was 140 patients who underwent a modified technique with a cephalad implantation of the graft in the ipsilateral iliac fossa and vascular anastomoses in the common iliac vessels. Both groups were comparable for age, cold ischemia time, incidence of rejection episodes, presence of adult polycystic kidney disease, and source of donor graft. RESULTS: Group M showed an incidence of lymphocele production (3 patients, 2.1%) significantly lower than group C (12 patients, 8.5%). Eight patients (1 in group M and 7 in group C) required surgical treatment by peritoneal fenestration. No allograft or recipient was lost as a result of fluid collection but the hospitalization was shorter in group M than in group C. CONCLUSIONS: A cephalad implantation of the renal graft in the ipsilateral iliac fossa has been associated with a lower incidence of lymphocele, probably because vascular anastomoses on the common iliac vessels cause less lymphatic derangement than those performed on the external iliac vessels.     

再次肾移植的临床研究

目的对再次肾移植进行临床总结。方法回顾性分析86例再次移植患者的临床资料,并与86例首次肾移植患者进行对比分析。首次肾移植失败的原因,17例为超急性排斥反应,9例为急性排斥反应,55例为慢性移植肾肾病,4例为移植肾破裂,1例为严重肾结核;再次移植前,31例群体反应性抗体(PRA)或补体依赖细胞毒(CDC)阳性;再次移植后,16例采用泼尼松(Pred)和硫唑嘌呤(Aza)预防急性排斥反应,70例采用环孢素A(或他克莫司)、Aza(或霉酚酸酯)及Pred组成的三联用药方案,32例再次移植前后接受抗体诱导治疗。结果再移植组人/肾1、3和5年存活率分别为84.8%/61.6%、79.1%/45.3%和58.1%/41.9%,对照组分别为89.5%/79.1%、81.4%/74.4%和67.4%/58.1%,两组人存活率的差异无统计学意义,而各时间段的肾存活率的差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);术前使用抗体诱导治疗者以及术后采用环孢素A(或他克莫司)预防排斥反应者移植肾1年存活率明显优于未用抗体诱导治疗者和仅用Aza、Pred治疗者;术后排斥反应发生率,再移植组明显高于首次移植组(P<0.05);再移植组术后感染发生率明显高于首次移植者。结论再次移植的肾存活率明显低于首次移植,术后排斥反应和感染的发生率较高;采用抗体诱导治疗有利于再移植肾的存活。     

Kidney retransplantation in comparison with first kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to depict the outcome of second and third kidney allografts in comparison with first kidney allografts. METHODS: Among 2150 kidney transplantations are 103 second and 5 third transplantations. Demographic characteristics and survivals of retransplanted patients were compared with a randomly selected group of first kidney recipients, consisting of two cases matched with each retransplanted patient for age, gender, and date of transplantation. RESULTS: Retransplanted patients consisted of 78 men and 30 women of mean age 32.63 +/- 11.92 years. They had received kidneys from 91 living-unrelated and 17 living-related donors. Median followup was 27 months. One-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year graft survivals were 81.4%, 78.9%, 78.9%, and 73.7% among retransplants, versus 92.9%, 91.5%, 89.8%, and 85.3% in the control group, respectively (P = .0037). Patient survival was 96%, 94.6%, 92.4%, and 87.8% in the retransplant group versus 93.1%, 92.4%, 90.9%, 87.4% in the control group, respectively (P = .63). Also, graft survivals were slightly lower in female compared to male retransplant patients (P = .09). No significant difference in survival rates was seen in different age groups. CONCLUSION: It seems that kidney retransplantation can yield desirable outcomes, albeit relatively lower graft survivals.     

Monolateral placement of both kidneys in dual kidney transplantation: low surgical complication rate and short operating time.

Dual kidney transplantation (DKT) from marginal donors is increasingly used at many centers to help cope with the organ shortage problem. The disadvantages of DKT consist in longer operating times and the risk of surgical complications. DKT can be performed in two ways, i.e. using monolateral or bilateral procedures. From October 1999 to June 2005, 58 DKTs were performed at our unit. In 29 cases (group I), the kidneys were extraperitoneally placed bilaterally in the iliac fossae via two separate incisions; as of June 2003, monolateral kidney placement was preferred in 29 cases, whenever compatible with the recipient's morphological status (group II). After a mean follow-up of 51 +/- 19 months for group I and 15 +/- 7 months for group II, all patients are alive with 1-year graft survival rates of 93% and 96%, respectively. Mean operating times were 351 +/- 76 min in group I and 261 +/- 31 min in group II (P = 0.0001). The mean S-creatinine levels in groups I and II were 132 +/- 47 and 119 +/- 36 mumol/l, respectively, at 1 year. We observed eight surgical complications in group I and seven in group II. Both techniques proved safe, with no differences in surgical complication rates. The monolateral procedure has the advantage of a shorter operating time and the contralateral iliac fossa remains available for further retransplantation procedures.     

影响再次肾移植临床效果的主要因素

目的:探讨影响再次肾移植临床效果的主要因素.方法:报告我院115例再次肾移植患者的临床资料,并与同期首次移植患者的人/肾存活率对比观察.结果:两组间1、3、5年受者存活率的差异无统计学意义;而移植肾的存活率再次移植组明显低于对照组(P<0.05).再次肾移植受者淋巴毒试验<59例,5%～10(例,>10%9例,其移植肾存活率分别为72%、31%、0%.再次肾移植受者PRA<10C例,>10例,其术后急性排斥反应发生率分别为30.2%、75.0%.术后排斥反应、感染、肝功能损伤的发生率,再次移植组高于首次移植组(P<0.05);高血压、高血脂、糖尿病的发生率两组未见显著性差异.结论:再次移植肾存活率低于首次移植;术前PRA、淋巴毒水平是影响再次肾移植效果的主要因素;术后排斥反应、感染及肝功能损伤的发生率高于首次肾移植.     

Ipsilateral placement of simultaneous pancreas and kidney allografts

The current standard technique for simultaneous kidney pancreas transplantation usually involves transplanting the pancreas to the right and the kidney to the left iliac system. Here we describe a previously unreported technique where both organs are transplanted to the right iliac system through a single midline incision. Forty-nine patients underwent simultaneous ipsilateral pancreas and kidney transplantation. All pancreas grafts were drained enterically. Overall patient, pancreas, and kidney survival were 96% (47/49), 92% (45/49), and 94% (46/49) respectively. The 45 patients with functioning grafts are insulin free and off of dialysis. Mean serum creatinine at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months was 1.7+/-1.3, 1.2+/-0.3, 1.3+/-0.3, and 1.3+/-0.4 mg/dL, respectively. The placement of the pancreas and kidney transplants on the same side is safe and does not compromise patient or graft survival. This approach preserves the left iliac system for future retransplantation if necessary.     

Long-term outcome of liver retransplantation in children

BACKGROUND: Retransplantation of the liver is the only means of prolonging survival in children whose initial graft has failed. Patient and graft survival rates after retransplantation in most series have been inferior to rates after first transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 450 pediatric liver transplantations performed between January 1990 and March 2001, 50 were first retransplantations, 9 were second retransplantations, and 1 was a third retransplantation. The overall retransplantation rate was 13.3% (median age at retransplantation 4 years and median weight 15 kg). The median post-retransplantation follow-up was 73 (range, 6-139) months. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier patient survival rates for the group (n=50) were 71.7%, 64.7%, and 64.7% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Graft survival rates were 65.6%, 56.7%, and 56.7% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. This is significantly worse than rates for children undergoing first liver transplantation. There were 17 deaths, of which 9 occurred in the first month. Biliary complications occurred in 5 (10%) patients and vascular complications in 6 (12%). Improved patient and graft survival rates were observed in the later phase of the program, although the difference was not significant. Higher preoperative serum creatinine (P=0.001) and serum bilirubin (P=0.02) levels were associated with a higher postoperative mortality. CONCLUSION: Results of retransplantation in children remain inferior to those after first transplantation. There is a trend toward improving results. Liver retransplantation makes an important contribution to overall survival in children.     

Kidney Retransplantation Outcomes: A Paired Recipient Control Study

BackgroundDespite progressive improvements in graft and patient survival after kidney transplantation over the last decades, an increasing number of patients are waitlisted for retransplantation. Identifying the risk factors for second graft failure can help us improve management for such patients. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of kidney retransplantation with those of first transplantation.MethodsThis retrospective study included all the recipients of a second kidney transplant between January 2008 and December 2019. For each patient with a second kidney transplant, we selected the paired recipient from the same donor. We excluded recipients of donations from living donors, patient-and-donor pairs with more than 1 transplant, and patients without a pair. The follow-up took place December 31, 2020. We included 152 patients, corresponding to 76 pairs of recipients.ResultsPatients who underwent a second transplant had significantly higher panel reactive antibody values and longer waiting time for retransplantation. Biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes were doubled in patients undergoing a second transplant (P = .12). There was a lower survival of second grafts at the first, fifth, and 10th year (P < .05). The main factor influencing graft loss for both groups was acute rejection, and, in patients, with a second transplant, acute rejection increased the risk of graft loss by 17 times (odds ratio, 17.5; 95% confidence interval, 4.19-98).ConclusionsThe clinical results of second kidney transplants still fall short of first transplants, with the main factor of poor prognosis being acute rejection. In young patients, allocation and immunosuppression management should consider this risk to improve long-term outcomes.     

Renal transplantation in small children--a comparison between surgical procedures.

OBJECTIVES: Renal transplantation is the therapy of choice for patients with end-stage renal failure. From the surgical point of view, small children remain a challenging patient group. METHODS: We report our experience with 61 consecutive kidney transplantations in small children aged < or =6 years. Outcome and graft survival rates were presented with special reference to the surgical procedure used to perform the renal transplantation. RESULTS: Of the 31 renal grafts, placed into the fossa iliaca (group 1), 8 grafts were lost shortly after transplantation due to a vascular complication (5 venous thromboses and 3 arterial thromboses). Six allografts were lost because of acute rejection. All in all, the 1- and 5-year graft survival rate in this group was 55.8% (p = 0.0106)/51.6% (p = 0.0134), respectively. Thirty grafts were placed retroperitoneally, using the aorta and the distal caval vein to perform end-to-side anastomoses (group 2). One graft was lost because of a venous thrombosis 6 weeks following transplantation, 3 further grafts were lost during the 1st year after transplantation due to acute rejection. The 1- and 5-year graft survival rate in that group was 86.6% (p = 0.0106)/83.3% (p = 0.0134), respectively. Comparing the 1-year graft survival rates of the two patient groups with special reference to vascular complications, we observed a 1-year graft survival rate of 74.2% (group 1) versus 96.6% (group 2; p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Our results on kidney transplantation in small children have considerably improved with the consistent use of the aorta and the distal caval vein to perform vascular anastomoses. The number of vascular complications following renal transplantation decreased, and especially for very small children the retroperitoneal placement of the graft is a safe, feasible surgical procedure that should be performed whenever possible.     

A Comparison of Long-Term Graft Survival Rates Between the First and Second Donor Kidney Transplanted—The Effect of a Longer Cold Ischaemic Time for the Second Kidney

Prolonged cold ischaemic time (CIT) is associated with delayed initial graft function and may also have a negative impact on long-term graft outcome. We carried out a study comparing the long-term graft survival rates between those recipients who received the first of a pair of donor kidneys versus the recipient of the second graft. Adult kidney transplant recipients who received one of a pair of donor kidneys at our institution between 1989-1995 were included. All recipients received a cyclosporin based immunosupression regimen. Graft survival rates were compared between the 2 groups at 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year intervals. A total of 520 renal transplant grafts were included in this study. Mean donor age was 35.4 years. Groups were similar for recipient age, gender, number of HLA mismatches, transplant number for that patient and percentage PRA. CIT was the only variable that was significantly different between the two groups; mean of 19.93 h in the first group compared to 25.65 h in the second group. Graft survival rates for the first kidney were significantly better than the second kidney-graft survival at 1 year 88.5% versus 84.7%, at 3 years 81.8% versus 76.7%, at 5 years 72.2% versus 64.9% and at 10 years 55.2% versus 40% (p = 0.012). Patient survival rates were similar in both groups. In our experience, the long-term graft survival rates are significantly better for the first kidney transplanted compared to the second kidney.     

Increased morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation as compared with non-diabetic patients.

The results of renal transplantation in patients with juvenile-onset diabetes mellitus were compared to those of a well-matched control group of non-diabetic patients. All transplantations were performed between 1977 and 1988. In the diabetic group hypertension (72 versus 41%), coronary artery disease (17 versus 0%), and peripheral vascular disease (19 versus 0%) had been significantly more frequent pretransplantation. Fewer diabetic patients had previously been treated with dialysis therapy (69 versus 97%). Graft function measured by creatinine clearance after 1 year follow-up, and incidence of proteinuria were not significantly different. The overall graft survival was significantly worse in the diabetic group compared to the control group: 42 versus 69% after 60 months and 21 versus 62% after 90 months. This was caused by a significantly worse patient survival in the diabetic group after 105 months: 28 versus 78% in the control group. The graft survival following exclusion of the patients who died with a functioning graft did not differ significantly between the groups after 60 and 90 months: 62 and 31% in the diabetic group and 69 and 62% in the control group. The existence of any vascular disease before transplantation, especially pre-existing peripheral vascular disease, had a significant effect on mortality in diabetic patients (P = 0.0003). After transplantation, diabetic patients had significantly more cerebrovascular accidents (23 versus 3%), peripheral vascular disease (31 versus 3%), and number of infections (1.9 versus 1.2). Retransplantation was carried out in each group to the same extent, with the same success rate.     

Long-Term Outcome of Kidney Retransplantation in Comparison With First Transplantation: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

BackgroundAdvances in renal transplantation have improved graft survival. However, many patients experience graft failure due to chronic renal allograft nephropathy. Although renal retransplantation is increasingly performed, its outcome is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of renal retransplantation compared with those of first renal transplantation.MethodsFrom March 1969 to August 2018, there were 3000 cases of renal transplantation performed at Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, Korea. Because the number of third renal transplantation was too small, only first and second renal transplantation groups were compared using propensity score matching. Outcomes of the third renal transplantation were then added. Graft survival rates were determined using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and assessed for significance using log-rank test.ResultsFive- and 10-year patient-graft survival rates for the first renal transplantation were 82.6% and 72.8%, respectively. Those for the second renal transplantation were 78.4% and 73.9%, respectively (P = .588). Five- and 10-year patient survival rates were 91.2% and 85.1%, respectively, for the first renal transplantation. These were 87.8% and 85.5%, respectively, for the second renal transplantation (P = .684). Five- and 10-year death-censored graft survival rates were 88.8% and 80.6%, respectively, for the first renal transplantation. These were 84.6% and 80.5%, respectively, for the second renal transplantation (P = .564).ConclusionsThis study showed that graft survival of second renal transplantation was not significantly different from that of first renal transplantation. Therefore, renal retransplantation might be a reasonable option for patients who lost the first renal graft.     

Liver retransplantation in children in Poland

An average of 15% of patients require retransplantation due to irreversible liver graft failure due to primary graft nonfunction, chronic rejection, vascular and biliary complications, or infections. The survival of patients and grafts after retransplantation is inferior to that after primary transplantation. The purpose of the present study was to examine the incidence, indications, and outcome of retransplantation in children. In our center 169 liver transplantations had been performed in 154 patients, and 14 patients (9%) required 15 retransplantations: nine in the early postoperative period, five late after primary transplantation, and one late after the second transplantation. One-year patient survival after primary transplantation was 82%, but after early retransplantation it was 55%.     

Results of kidney retransplantation

Sixty-two patients had a second renal transplant at the University of Florida, Gainesville , between Nov 30, 1966 and June 26, 1982. Two-year graft function for all 62 patients was 53.2%, and patient survival was 83.9%. The 51 recipients of cadaveric grafts had a two-year graft survival of 47%. Eleven patients who received second grafts from related donors had a two-year graft survival of 81.8%. Source of first grafts and length of survival of first grafts did not seem to be important in determining the outcome of second grafts. Recipients of cadaveric second kidneys had a significantly better two-year graft survival if they waited longer than six months between loss of the first kidney and retransplantation (52.9%) than if they waited less than six months (35.3%). We believe the results of kidney retransplantation justify second transplants in patients who lost their first grafts.     

Single‐center experience with third and fourth kidney transplants

Kidney retransplantation is often associated with a higher immunological risk than is primary renal transplantation. Faced with increasing organ shortage and growing waiting lists, results of kidney retransplantation are of particular interest. Fifty‐six third and fourth kidney transplants were analyzed retrospectively. Parameters included patient and donor demographics, operative details, incidence of surgical, immunological and infectious complications and patient and graft survival. Patients receiving third kidney grafts had 1‐ and 5‐year patient/graft survival rates of 97.4%/72.9% and 88.9%/53.6%, respectively. Episodes of acute rejection and delayed graft function were observed in 44% and 49% of these patients. Fourth kidney transplantation was associated with 1‐ and 2‐year patient/graft survival rates of 84.8%/68.5% and 63.6%/47%, respectively. Acute rejection and delayed graft function occurred in 33% and in 60% of cases. Acceptable patient and graft survival may be achieved after third and fourth kidney transplantation. Graft losses in this sensitized population are mainly because of rejection. Profound immunosuppression may lead to major infectious problems.     

Retransplantation of discordant xenogeneic islets with costimulatory blockade

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to analyze the possibility of xenogeneic islet retransplantation using costimulatory blockade. METHODS: Streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice were transplanted under the kidney capsule with human islets. Mice were nephrectomized and retransplanted with 1000 human islets under the contralateral kidney capsule 14 days later. Four groups were performed group I, first and second Tx without MR1; group II, first Tx without MR1, second Tx with MR1; group III, first Tx with MR1, second Tx without MR1; group IV, first and second Tx with MR1. A control group was transplanted only once without MR1 with human islets. After second Tx, cross-matches between recipient, serum and human lymphocyte were done for detection of antidonor antibodies. RESULTS: In the control group, mean graft survival was 13 (+/-7) days. In group I, mean graft survival was 5 +/- 3 days. In group II, mean graft survival was 16 +/- 13 days. In group III, mean graft survival was 81 +/- 22 days. In group IV, no rejection were recorded and all graft survived more than 120 days. Pretransplant cross-matches were negative. In groups I and II all cross-matches were positive, while none were positive in group IV. CONCLUSION: Retransplantation of xenogeneic islets was associated with accelerated rejection. After presensitization, MR1 was unable to induce tolerance to a second Tx. MR1 given at the first Tx only allowed prolonged survival of the second Tx, but rejection still occurred. MR1 given at first and second Tx allowed long-term survival of retransplanted xenoislets and prevented occurrence of antidonor antibodies.     

The long-term outcomes of transplantation of kidneys with multiple renal arteries

Kidneys with multiple renal arteries are increasingly procured for transplantation. To compare the outcomes of kidney transplantation using allografts with multiple arteries, we studied long-term graft function and survival according to their number of arterial anastomoses during an 18-year period from July 1, 1990, through December 31, 2008, in which only the recipient's external iliac artery or internal iliac artery was used for anastomosis (n = 1186). The recipients were divided into four groups: group I, single renal artery with single anastomosis (n = 890, 75.0%); group Il, multiple renal arteries, single anastomosis (n = 26, 2.2%); group Ill, multiple renal arteries, multiple anastomoses (n = 236, 19.9%); and group IV, polar artery ligation (n = 34, 2.9%). We compared the following variables patient and graft survivals; mean creatinine levels at 1 and 6 months, as well as 1-, 3-, and 5-years posttransplant; the number of acute rejection episodes, and the rates of vascular and urologic complications. The creatinine values and incidences of acute rejection episodes did not differ significantly (P = 0.399 and P = 0.990, respectively). There were no significant differences among the four groups in graft survival (P = 0.951), patient survival (P = 0.751), incidence of vascular (P = 0.999) or urologic complications (P = 0.371). The four groups were subdivided according to the recipient arterial anastomosis to the main graft renal artery. The subdivided groups showed no significant differences in graft or patient survival, or complications rates. The results indicated that multiplicity of renal arteries in kidney transplantation did not adversely affect allograft or patient survival compared with single renal artery transplantation. Moreover, the type of the arterial anastomosis (main renal artery end-to-end anastomosed to internal iliac artery or end-to-side anastomosed to external iliac artery appeared to not affect graft or patient survival or the incidence of vascular or urologic complications.     

儿童肾移植23例临床分析

目的　探讨儿童肾移植的临床特点及围手术期处理特点。方法　回顾性分析平均年龄(15 4± 1 0 )岁的 2 3例儿童肾移植患者的临床资料 ,统计术后移植肾功能变化、急性排斥及并发症发生率。结果　 2 3例手术过程顺利 ,均未出现外科并发症。 1例治疗非顺应致移植肾失去功能 ,2 2例术后平均 5 5d恢复肾功能。术后 6个月内科并发症包括高血压 13例 (5 7% )、肺部感染 4例 (17% )、骨髓抑制与药物性肝损害各 3例 (13% )。术后 1年内急性排斥反应 4例 (17% )。术后第 1年体重平均增加 2 3kg ,身高平均增高 1 0cm。 1年、3年人 /肾生存率分别为 10 0 % / 96 %、90 % / 80 %。结论　肾移植是治疗儿童终末期肾病的有效治疗措施。合适的术式、术后免疫抑制药物的合理应用、并发症的预防和及时治疗是提高人、肾存活率的关键。     

Outcome of hepatic artery reconstruction in liver transplantation with an iliac arterial interposition graft

BACKGROUND: In case of anomal hepatic arterial inflow, it can be necessary to perform revascularization of the liver allograft by iliac arterial interposition graft. METHODS: We analyzed retrospectively 613 liver transplants in a 16-yr period. The hepatic artery (HA) graft group (n = 101) consisted of patients with arterial inflow based on recipient infrarenal aorta using donor iliac artery graft tunneled through the transverse mesocolon. The control group (n = 512) consisted of patients who underwent liver transplantation with routine HA reconstruction. RESULTS: Both groups are homogeneous and comparable. In case of retransplantation, arterial conduit with iliac graft was adopted more frequently instead of conventional arterial anastomosis (24.8% vs. 9%, p < 0.0001). The 1-, 3- and 5-yr overall survival was 85.41, 79.42, 76.57% in the control group and 76.21, 73.43, 73.43% in the HA graft group, respectively (p = ns). The 1-, 3- and 5-yr graft survival was better in the control group (81.51, 73.66, 69.22% vs. 71.17, 62.50, 53.42%) (p = 0.01). In case of retransplantation, the 1-, 3- and 5-yr overall (57.81, 53.95, 41.96% vs. 60, 51.95, 49.85%) and graft survival (57.52, 53.68, 41.75% vs. 56, 50.4, 40.3%) was similar in control and HA graft group, respectively (p = ns). Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) rate is 21.8% vs. 8.6% (p < 0.0001) in HA graft group and control group, respectively. The only factor independently predictive of early HAT resulted arterial conduit (p = 0.001, OR = 3.13, 95% CI: 1.57-6.21). Retransplant procedure, donor age and arterial iliac conduit were found to be a significant risk factors for late HAT, at univariate analysis. At multivariate analysis, donor age >50 yr old resulted the only factor independently associated with late HAT (p < 0.0001, OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.02-1.07). CONCLUSION: Iliac arterial interpositional graft is an alternative solution for arterial revascularization of liver allograft in case of retransplantation when the use of HA is not possible. In case of primary transplantation, is better not to perform arterial conduit if it is possible, for poor graft survival and high incidence of early HAT, especially in case of liver donor aged over 50 yr.