Relationship between percent positive biopsies and biochemical outcome after permanent interstitial brachytherapy for clinically organ-confined carcinoma of the prostate gland

PURPOSE: Recently, the percentage of positive prostate biopsies has been reported to be statistically significant in predicting the biochemical outcome after either radical prostatectomy or 3-dimensional conformal external beam radiotherapy. In this study, we evaluated the impact of the percentage of positive prostate biopsies in predicting the 5-year biochemical outcome for patients with clinically organ-confined prostate cancer undergoing permanent interstitial brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two hundred sixty-two hormone naive patients underwent transperineal ultrasound-guided permanent prostate brachytherapy with generous periprostatic margins, using either 103Pd or 125I for clinical T1b/T2b NXM0 (1997 AJCC) adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland from April 1995 to October 1999. No patient was lost to follow-up. The actual percentage of positive biopsies (number of positive biopsies/total number of biopsies) was determinable for 255 of the 262 patients. Of the evaluated cases, 133 patients were implanted with 103Pd and 122 patients with 125I. The median patient age was 68 years (range 48-81). The median follow-up was 38.6 months (range 6-73). Follow-up was calculated from the day of implantation. Patients were stratified by the percentage of positive biopsies into the following groups: <34%, 34-50%, and >50%. Additional clinical parameters evaluated included patient age, clinical T-stage, Gleason score, pretreatment prostate specific antigen (PSA), risk group, and prostate volume. Low-risk patients were staged as clinical T1c/T2a, Gleason score < or =6, and pretreatment PSA < or =10 ng/mL, intermediate-risk patients presented with one unfavorable prognostic parameter, and high-risk patients presented with two or more unfavorable prognostic parameters (clinical stage T2b, PSA >10 ng/mL, Gleason score > or =7). Treatment parameters included the use of supplemental external beam radiation and choice of isotope. Biochemical disease-free survival was defined by the American Society of Therapeutic Radiation and Oncology consensus definition. RESULTS: For the 255 evaluated patients, the 5-year actuarial biochemical no evidence of disease survival rate was 92.5%. For patients with low, intermediate, and high-risk disease, 95.8%, 98.1%, and 79.4% of patients were free of biochemical failure, respectively. When each risk group was stratified into the percent positive biopsy categories of <34%, 34-50%, and >50%, no statistical difference was found in biochemical outcome for the biopsy subgroups. In multivariate analysis, none of the clinical or treatment parameters predicted for failure in the low-risk group; only Gleason score was predictive for intermediate-risk patients and only PSA for high-risk patients. In the overall population, PSA and Gleason score were both found to be predictors of biochemical failure, but not risk group, clinical stage, or percentage of positive biopsies. There was no significant dependence between the percent positive biopsy group and the Kaplan-Meier biochemical survival rates for any of the various subgroups of clinical and treatment parameters, except for clinical stage T1c-T2a (p = 0.006). The median postimplant PSA was 0.2 ng/mL for patients with either low-risk disease or <34% positive biopsies and 0.1 ng/mL for all other risk groups or percent positive biopsy subgroups. CONCLUSION: Although a significant trend was found for biochemical failure with increasing percent positive biopsies in the overall population, our results suggest that the percentage of positive biopsies is not statistically significant in predicting the 5-year biochemical disease-free outcome for patients with low, intermediate, and high-risk disease undergoing permanent prostate brachytherapy. Only the Gleason score in intermediate-risk patients and the pretreatment PSA level in high-risk patients was predictive of biochemical failure. We believe this relative lack of significance for the percentage of positive biopsies is a result of dose escalation far exceeding other radiotherapy modalities and the ability to aggressively treat the periprostatic region compared with radical prostatectomy by way of the accurate placement of periprostatic seeds.     

Four-year biochemical outcome after radioimmunoguided transperineal brachytherapy for patients with prostate adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE: To evaluate 4-year biochemical outcomes for patients with prostate adenocarcinoma who underwent radioimmunoguided (Prostascint) permanent prostate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighty patients with clinical T1C-T3A NxM0 prostate cancer underwent ProstaScint-guided prostate brachytherapy using either (103)Pd or (125)I between February 1997 and December 2000. Sixty-seven patients underwent prostate brachytherapy alone, whereas 13 patients received neoadjuvant hormonal manipulation before implantation. Risk factors (RF) included PSA >10, Stage >or=T2b, and Gleason grade >or=7. Sixty patients had low-risk disease (0 RF), 17 were intermediate risk (1 RF), and 3 were high risk (2 RF). Biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) was calculated using the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) consensus criteria, a PSA cutoff of 1.0 ng/mL, and a PSA cutoff of 0.5 ng/mL. RESULTS: Four-year bDFS for the entire cohort was 97.4% using the ASTRO consensus criteria. Low-risk patients (60) had a 4-year bDFS of 100%; intermediate- and high-risk patients (20 patients) were 89.2%. The hormonally na?ve group (67 patients) had a 4-year bDFS of 96.9% and a median PSA nadir of 0.2 ng/mL. Median time to nadir was 19.8 months (range: 1.9-53.2 months). For the neoadjuvant hormonal therapy group (13 patients), ASTRO-defined bDFS was 100%. Overall, 85.2% of patients had a posttreatment PSA 相似文献   

Impact of supplemental external beam radiotherapy and/or androgen deprivation therapy on biochemical outcome after permanent prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of supplemental external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and/or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) on 8-year biochemical outcome after permanent prostate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between April 1995 and January 2001, 668 consecutive patients underwent brachytherapy using either (103)Pd or (125)I for clinical Stage T1b-T3aNxM0 (2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer) adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland. No patient underwent seminal vesicle biopsy or pathologic lymph node staging. The median follow-up was 58.6 months. Biochemical progression-free survival was defined by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition. The clinical, treatment, and dosimetric parameters evaluated for biochemical progression-free survival included supplemental EBRT, ADT, patient age, clinical stage, Gleason score, preimplant prostate specific antigen (PSA), risk group, percentage of positive biopsies, isotope used, prostate volume, planning volume, percentage of target volume receiving 100%, 150%, and 200% of prescribed dose, minimal percentage of dose covering 90% of target volume, tobacco status, hypertension, and diabetes. RESULTS: For the entire group, the actuarial 8-year biochemical progression-free survival rate was 98.2%, 98.4%, and 88.2% for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients, respectively, with a median PSA level of <0.1 ng/mL for all risk groups and ADT and EBRT subgroups. At last follow-up, only 5 patients (0.8%) had died of metastatic prostate cancer. In multivariate analysis, Gleason score, percentage of positive biopsies, and ADT predicted for biochemical outcome in high-risk patients. In low- and intermediate-risk patients, none of the evaluated variables predicted for biochemical outcome. For the entire population, pretreatment PSA level, Gleason score, ADT, and clinical stage predicted for 8-year biochemical progression-free survival, with the percentage of positive biopsies approaching statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Prostate brachytherapy results in a high probability of 8-year biochemical progression-free survival for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients. Although the role of supplemental EBRT could not be adequately evaluated in high-risk patients, it did not improve biochemical outcome in low- and intermediate-risk patients. However, ADT resulted in a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival for high-risk patients.     

Five-year biochemical outcome following permanent interstitial brachytherapy for clinical T1-T3 prostate cancer

PURPOSE: To evaluate 5-year biochemical disease-free outcome for men with clinical T1b-T3a NxM0 1977 American Joint Committee on Cancer (1997 AJCC) adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland who underwent transperineal ultrasound-guided permanent prostate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Four hundred twenty-five patients underwent transperineal ultrasound-guided prostate brachytherapy using either 103Pd or 125I, for clinical T1b-T3a NxM0 (1997 AJCC) adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland, from April 1995 to October 1999. No patient underwent pathologic lymph-node staging. One hundred ninety patients were implanted with either 103Pd or 125I monotherapy; 235 patients received moderate-dose external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), followed by a prostate brachytherapy boost; 163 patients received neoadjuvant hormonal manipulation, in conjunction with either 103Pd or 125I monotherapy (77 patients) or in conjunction with moderate-dose EBRT and a prostate brachytherapy boost (86 patients). The median patient age was 68.0 years (range, 48.2-81.3 years). The median follow-up was 31 months (range, 11-69 months). Follow-up was calculated from the day of implantation. No patient was lost to follow-up. Biochemical disease-free survival was defined by the American Society of Therapeutic Radiation and Oncology (ASTRO) consensus definition. RESULTS: For the entire cohort, the 5-year actuarial biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED) survival rate was 94%. For patients with low-, intermediate-, and high-risk disease, the 5-year biochemical disease-free rates were 97.1%, 97.5%, and 84.4%, respectively. For hormone-naive patients, 95.7%, 96.4%, and 79.9% of patients with low-, intermediate-, and high-risk disease were free of biochemical failure. Clinical and treatment parameters predictive of biochemical outcome included: clinical stage, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, risk group, age > 65 years, and neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. Isotope choice was not a statistically significant predictor of disease-free survival for any risk group. The median postimplant PSA was < or = 0.2 for all risk groups, regardless of hormonal status. The mean posttreatment PSA, however, was significantly lower for men implanted with 103Pd (0.14 ng/mL) than for those implanted with 125I (0.25 ng/mL), p < or = 0.001. CONCLUSION: With a median follow-up of 31 months, permanent prostate brachytherapy results in a high probability of actuarial 5-year biochemical disease-free survival (DFS) for patients with clinical T1b-T3a (1997 AJCC) adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland, with an apparent plateau on the PSA survival curve.     

Prostate-specific antigen spikes after permanent prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether any clinical, treatment, or dosimetric parameters correlated with the development of a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) spike after permanent prostate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The evaluated population consisted of 218 hormone-naive patients free of biochemical or clinical failure who underwent permanent prostate brachytherapy with or without supplemental external beam radiotherapy for clinical Stage T1b-T3a adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland (1997 AJCC) between August 1995 and November 1999. No patient underwent pre- or postimplant hormonal manipulation, pretreatment seminal vesicle biopsy, or pathologic lymph node staging. In addition, none of the 218 patients possessed equivocal biochemical results (one or two consecutive PSA rises or a declining PSA >1.0 ng/mL). The median patient follow-up was 46.2 months. A PSA spike was defined as a rise of >or=0.2 ng/mL, followed by a durable decline. The clinical parameters evaluated included patient age, clinical T stage, Gleason score, pretreatment PSA level, prostate volume, brachytherapy planning volume, and patient follow-up in months. The evaluated treatment parameters included isotope and use of supplemental external beam radiotherapy. The dosimetric parameters evaluated included the minimal dose received by 90% of the prostate gland (D(90)), the percentage of the prostate volume receiving 100% (V(100)), 150%, and 200% (V(200)) of the prescribed minimal peripheral dose, and the mean, median, maximal, and minimal urethral doses. Biochemical disease-free survival was defined by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition with the additional constraint that the most recent PSA level was 0.2 to 0.5 to 1.0 ng/mL (20%, 50%, and 80%, respectively, p <0.001). In Cox multivariate regression analysis, patient age, clinical stage, first postimplant PSA level, and V(150) were predictive for the development of a PSA spike. A postimplant dosimetric threshold of either <115% of the minimal peripheral dose for D(90) or <55% of the prostate volume for V(150) was strongly predictive of a spike. When the variables only determinable after the occurrence of the PSA spike were included in the multivariate analysis, V(150), preimplant PSA level, and nadir PSA were the significant predictors. CONCLUSION: Of the patients, 23.9% developed a PSA spike with a median time to development of 16.3 months and a median prespike and median postspike PSA of 0.50 ng/mL and 0.90 ng/mL, respectively. In multivariate analysis, patient age, clinical stage, first postimplant PSA level, and V(150) were predictive for the development of a PSA spike. At approximately 66 months after implantation, the PSA curves converged for spike and nonspike patients, with a median PSA level <0.1 ng/mL.     

Matched-pair analysis of conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost versus external-beam radiation therapy alone for locally advanced prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: We performed a matched-pair analysis to compare our institution's experience in treating locally advanced prostate cancer with external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone to EBRT in combination with conformal interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boosts (EBRT + HDR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1991 to 1998, 161 patients with locally advanced prostate cancer were prospectively treated with EBRT + HDR at William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan. Patients with any of the following characteristics were eligible for study entry: pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of >/= 10.0 ng/mL, Gleason score >/= 7, or clinical stage T2b to T3c. Pelvic EBRT (46.0 Gy) was supplemented with three (1991 through 1995) or two (1995 through 1998) ultrasound-guided transperineal interstitial iridium-192 HDR implants. The brachytherapy dose was escalated from 5.50 to 10.50 Gy per implant. Each of the 161 EBRT + HDR patients was randomly matched with a unique EBRT-alone patient. Patients were matched according to PSA level, Gleason score, T stage, and follow-up duration. The median PSA follow-up was 2.5 years for both EBRT + HDR and EBRT alone. RESULTS: EBRT + HDR patients demonstrated significantly lower PSA nadir levels (median, 0.4 ng/mL) compared with those receiving EBRT alone (median, 1.1 ng/mL). The 5-year biochemical control rates for EBRT + HDR versus EBRT-alone patients were 67% versus 44%, respectively (P <.001). On multivariate analyses, pretreatment PSA, Gleason score, T stage, and the use of EBRT alone were significantly associated with biochemical failure. Those patients in both treatment groups who experienced biochemical failure had a lower 5-year cause-specific survival rate than patients who were biochemically controlled (84% v 100%; P <.001). CONCLUSION: Locally advanced prostate cancer patients treated with EBRT + HDR demonstrate improved biochemical control compared with those who are treated with conventional doses of EBRT alone.     

Multi-institutional analysis of long-term outcome for stages T1-T2 prostate cancer treated with permanent seed implantation

PURPOSE: To assess long-term prostate-specific antigen (PSA) outcome after permanent prostate brachytherapy (BT) and identify predictors of improved disease-free survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eleven institutions combined data on 2,693 patients treated with permanent interstitial BT monotherapy for T1-T2 prostate cancer. Of these patients, 1,831 (68%) were treated with I-125 (median dose, 144 Gy) and 862 (32%) were treated with Pd-103 (median dose, 130 Gy). Criteria for inclusion were: available pre-BT PSA, BT > or =5 years before data submission, BT between 1988-1998, and no androgen deprivation before failure. The median follow-up was 63 months. RESULTS: Among patients where the I-125 dose to 90% of the prostate (D90) was > or =130 Gy, the 8-year PSA relapse-free survival (PRFS) was 93% compared with 76% for those with lower D90 dose levels (p < 0.001). A multivariable analysis identified tumor stage (p = 0.002), Gleason score (p < 0.001), pretreatment PSA level (p < 0.001), treatment year (p = 0.001), and the isotope used (p = 0.004) as pretreatment and treatment variables associated with PRFS. When restricted to patients with available postimplantation dosimetric information, D90 emerged as a significant predictor of biochemical outcome (p = 0.01), and isotope was not significant. The 8-year PRFS was 92%, 86%, 79%, and 67%, respectively, for patients with PSA nadir values of 0-0.49, 0.5-0.99, 1.0-1.99, and >2.0 ng/mL (p < 0.001). Among patients free of biochemical relapse at 8 years, the median nadir level was 0.1 ng/mL, and 90% of these patients achieved a nadir PSA level <0.6 ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: Outcome after permanent BT for prostatic cancer relates to tumor stage, Gleason score, pretreatment PSA, BT year, and post-BT dosimetric quality. PSA nadir < or =0.5 ng/mL was particularly associated with durable long-term PSA disease-free survival. The only controllable factor to impact on long-term outcome was the D90 which is a reflection of implant quality.     

Outcome and predictive factors for patients with Gleason score 7 prostate carcinoma treated with three-dimensional conformal external beam radiation therapy

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the biochemical outcome and factors predictive of outcome in prostate carcinoma patients with Gleason score 7 tumors who were treated with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT). METHODS: Between August 1990 and October 1997, 163 T1-T3NXM0 prostate carcinoma patients with Gleason score 7 were treated with definitive 3DCRT alone. The median follow-up, International Commission on Radiological Units dose, and pretreatment prostate specific antigen (PSA) for the entire group were 50 months, 76 grays (Gy), and 11.4 ng/mL, respectively. Independent predictors based on multivariate results were used to stratify the patients into prognostic groups for which biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED) control was reported. Biochemical NED failure was defined according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel definition. RESULTS: The 5-year bNED control for all patients was 66%. Stratified by pretreatment PSA, 5-year bNED control rates were 83%, 65%, and 21% for 0-9.9 ng/mL, 10-19.9 ng/mL, and > or =20 ng/mL, respectively. Dose to the central axis was found to be a significant treatment factor, with patients receiving > or =76 Gy experiencing 76% 5-year bNED control versus 54% when treated with <76 Gy to isocenter. Pretreatment PSA, dose, and palpation stage were significant independent predictors for bNED control upon multivariate analysis. Patients with a PSA <10 ng/mL who received a dose of > or =76 Gy had excellent 5-year bNED control of 100% compared with 50% bNED if patients had PSA >10 ng/mL or received radiation therapy doses of <76 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with Gleason score 7 adenocarcinoma who had a pretreatment PSA <10 ng/mL and received doses of > or =76 Gy had excellent 5-year bNED control, emphasizing the importance of higher central axis doses in treating Gleason 7 tumors. Patients with intermediate PSA (10-19.9 ng/mL) also required doses > or =76 Gy. Pretreatment PSA > or = 20 ng/mL portends a very poor bNED outcome for Gleason 7 patients treated with radiation therapy alone, and thus efforts should be directed toward multimodal or long term hormonal treatment strategies.     

Androgen deprivation therapy does not impact cause-specific or overall survival in high-risk prostate cancer managed with brachytherapy and supplemental external beam

PURPOSE: To determine cause-specific survival (CSS), biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), and overall survival (OS) in high-risk prostate cancer patients undergoing brachytherapy with or without supplemental therapies. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between April 1995 and July 2002, 204 patients with high-risk prostate cancer (Gleason score > or = 8 or prostate-specific antigen [PSA] >20 ng/mL or clinical stage > or = T2c) underwent brachytherapy. Median follow-up was 7.0 years. The bPFS was defined by a PSA < or = 0.40 ng/mL after nadir. Multiple clinical, treatment, and dosimetric parameters were evaluated for the impact on survival. RESULTS: The 10-year CSS, bPFS, and OS were 88.9%, 86.6%, and 68.6%, respectively. A statistically significant difference in bPFS was discerned between hormone naive, ADT < or = 6 months, and ADT >6 month cohorts (79.7% vs. 95.% vs. 89.9%, p = 0.032). Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) did not impact CSS or OS. For bPFS patients, the median posttreatment PSA was <0.04 ng/mL. A Cox linear regression analysis demonstrated that Gleason score was the best predictor of CSS, whereas percent positive biopsies and duration of ADT best predicted for bPFS. The OS was best predicted by Gleason score and diabetes. Thirty-eight patients have died, with 26 of the deaths from cardiovascular/pulmonary disease or second malignancy. Eleven patients have died of metastatic prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The ADT improved 10-year bPFS without statistical impact on CSS or OS. Death as a result of cardiovascular/pulmonary disease and second malignancies were more than twice as common as prostate cancer deaths. Strategies to improve cardiovascular health should positively impact OS.     

Primary Gleason pattern does not impact survival after permanent interstitial brachytherapy for Gleason score 7 prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: The impact of primary Gleason pattern was determined on cause-specific (CSS), biochemical progression-free (bPFS), and overall survival (OS) after brachytherapy for Gleason score 7 prostate cancer. METHODS: From April 1995 to October 2003, 530 patients underwent brachytherapy for Gleason score 3+4 (n = 300) or Gleason 4+3 (n = 230) prostate cancer. All patients underwent brachytherapy more than 3 years before analysis. The median follow-up was 5.7 years. Of the 530 patients, 412 (77.7%) received supplemental external beam radiation therapy (XRT) and 177 (33.4%) received androgen deprivation therapy. bPFS was defined by a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 相似文献   

Role of hormonal therapy in the management of intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer treated with permanent radioactive seed implantation

PURPOSE: To study the impact of hormonal therapy (HTx) on intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer treated with permanent radioactive seed implantation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with Stage T1b-T3bN0 prostate cancer, and Gleason score > or = 7 or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level >10 ng/mL were treated with seed implantation with or without HTx. Their disease was defined as intermediate risk (PSA 10-20, Gleason score 7, or Stage T2b) or high risk (two or more intermediate criteria, or PSA >20 ng/mL, Gleason score 8-10, or Stage T2c-T3). The median follow-up for 201 eligible patients was 42 months (range 18-110). Biochemical failure was defined as a rising PSA >1.0 ng/mL. Pretreatment disease characteristics, implant dose, and HTx were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: HTx significantly improved 5-year actuarial freedom from biochemical failure rate, 79% vs. 54% without HTx. In addition, high-dose, PSA < or = 15 ng/mL, intermediate risk, and Stage T2a or lower significantly improved outcome in the univariate analyses. HTx was the most significant predictor of 5-year actuarial freedom from biochemical failure (p <0.0001) in a multivariate analysis. The best outcome was in the intermediate-risk patients treated with a high implant dose and HTx, resulting in a 4-year actuarial freedom from biochemical failure rate of 94%. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective review, HTx improved outcome in intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with brachytherapy. HTx was the most important prognostic factor in the univariate and multivariate analyses.     

Combined modality treatment in the management of high-risk prostate cancer

PURPOSE: The efficacy of a multimodality protocol using neoadjuvant and concomitant hormonal therapy, brachytherapy, and three-dimensional conformal external beam radiotherapy (RT) in high-risk prostate cancer was evaluated using biochemical outcomes and posttreatment biopsy results. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between February 1994 and November 1999, 132 high-risk patients were treated with combined hormonal therapy (9 months), permanent radioactive seed brachytherapy, and external beam RT, with follow-up ranging from 36 to 88 months (median, 50 months). The eligibility criteria were any of the following: Gleason score 8-10, initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level >20 ng/mL, clinical Stage T2c-T3, or positive seminal vesicle biopsy, or two or more of the following: Gleason score 7, PSA level >10-20 ng/mL, or Stage T2b. Twenty percent of patients had a positive seminal vesicle biopsy before therapy. Negative laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissections were performed in 44% of patients. RESULTS: The actuarial overall freedom from PSA failure rate was 86% at 5 years. The freedom from PSA failure rate at 5 years was 97% for those with a Gleason score of < or =6 (35 of 36), 85% for a Gleason score of 7 (50 of 59), and 76% for a Gleason score of 8-10 (28 of 37; p = 0.03). A trend was noted toward worse outcomes in seminal vesicle biopsy-positive patients, with a 5-year freedom from PSA failure rate of 74% vs. 89% for all other patients (p = 0.06). Posttreatment prostate biopsies were performed in 47 patients and were negative in 96% at the first biopsy and 100% at the last biopsy. CONCLUSION: Trimodality therapy with androgen suppression, brachytherapy, and external beam RT for high-risk prostate cancer results in excellent biochemical and pathologically confirmed local control.     

High-dose-rate intensity-modulated brachytherapy with external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer: California endocurietherapy's 10-year results

PURPOSE: To present the long-term outcome and morbidity of high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) combined with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for localized prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between September 1991 and December 1998, 209 consecutive patients with no prior androgen suppression were treated with HDR-BT plus EBRT. The median follow-up was 7.25 years (range, 5-12 years). The patients were stratified into three risk groups: low (Stage T2a or less, Gleason score 20). Four definitions of PSA progression were compared with the general clinical failure outcome: the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) definition, nadir plus 2.0 ng/mL, two consecutive rises >/=0.5 ng/mL, and PSA level >0.2 ng/mL. Morbidity was scored using Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria. RESULTS: The general clinical control rate was 90% (188 of 209), and the general clinical failure rate was 10% (21 of 209). The overall survival rate was 79%, and the cause-specific survival rate was 97%. The PSA progression-free survival (ASTRO definition) rate was 90%, 87%, and 69% for the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively. The nadir plus 2 ng/mL and two rises >/=0.5 definitions correlated better with the actual clinical outcome than did the ASTRO and PSA >0.2 ng/mL definitions. The rate of Grade 3 and 4 late urinary morbidity was 6.7% and 1%, respectively, mostly occurring in patients who had undergone post-RT transurethral prostate resection. No late Grade 3 or 4 rectal morbidity developed. The sexual potency preservation rate was 67%. CONCLUSION: Our 10-year results have demonstrated HDR-BT plus EBRT is a proven treatment for all stages of localized prostate cancer. The morbidity was low, but post-RT transurethral resection should be avoided.     

Effect of cigarette smoking on biochemical outcome after permanent prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE: Recent studies have suggested that cigarette smoking may be associated with an increased risk of death from prostate cancer. In this study, we evaluated the effect of cigarette smoking on the presentation and biochemical outcome after permanent prostate brachytherapy for prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 582 patients underwent brachytherapy with generous periprostatic margins using either (103)Pd or (125)I with or without supplemental external beam radiotherapy between April 1995 and September 2000. Of the 582 patients, 178 (30.6%) had never smoked, 306 (52.6%) were former smokers, and 98 (16.8%) were current smokers. The median patient age was 67.9 years, and the median follow-up was 54.5 months. No patient was lost to follow-up. No patient underwent routine seminal vesicle biopsy or pathologic lymph node staging. The clinical, treatment, and dosimetric parameters evaluated included tobacco status, age, clinical stage, Gleason score, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level, risk group, percentage of positive biopsies, ultrasound volume, isotope used, planning volume, hormonal status, use of external beam radiotherapy, and postimplant dosimetry (percentage of target volume receiving 100%, 150%, and 200% of the prescribed dose and percentage of prescribed dose covering 90% of the target volume). Biochemical outcome was determined using the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition. RESULTS: No differences in the clinical, treatment, or dosimetric parameters were identified, except that current smokers were statistically younger than those who had never smoked or former smokers (65.9 vs. 67.8 vs. 68.3 years, respectively, p = 0.016). Specifically, no relationship was discerned between tobacco history and risk group, supplemental external beam radiotherapy, choice of isotope, or use of hormonal therapy. The overall biochemical freedom from progression survival rate at 7 years was 96.2%, 95.6%, and 91.6% for patients who had never smoked, former smokers, and current smokers, respectively (p = 0.126). When stratified by risk group and hormonal status, tobacco consumption did not predict outcome, although a trend for poorer biochemical progression-free survival was noted in current smokers. The median prostate-specific antigen level for hormone-naive and hormonally manipulated disease-free patients was <0.1 ng/mL. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, Gleason score, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level, risk group, and hormonal status were predictors of biochemical outcome. CONCLUSION: In this prostate brachytherapy cohort, tobacco consumption did not predict for risk group stratification or treatment approach. Although no statistically significant difference was found in biochemical progression-free survival, a trend for poorer biochemical outcome was demonstrated in current smokers.     

Analysis of prostate-specific antigen bounce after I permanent seed implant for localised prostate cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To report on the incidence of benign prostate-specific antigen bounce following permanent I(125) prostate brachytherapy, to describe the associations in our population and review the relationship of bounce to subsequent biochemical failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From February 2000 to May 2005, 374 patients with localised prostate cancer were treated with I(125) permanent prostate brachytherapy at a single institution. A prospectively collected database was used to identify cases of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) bounce, defined as a rise of 0.2 ng/ml above an initial PSA nadir with subsequent decline to or below that nadir without treatment. The patients who received neo-adjuvant or adjuvant hormone manipulation were excluded. Biochemical failure was determined using the both the ASTRO consensus definition and Phoenix (nadir +2 ng/mL) definition. RESULTS: Two hundred and five patients were identified with a median follow-up of 45 months (24-85). PSA bounce was noted in 79 (37%) men, occurring at a median of 14.8 months (1.7-40.6) following implant. The median peak PSA was 1.8 ng/ml (0.4-7.4) with a bounce magnitude of 0.91 ng/ml (0.2-5.8). When pre- and post-implant factors were assessed for association to bounce, only younger age was statistically significant (p=0.002). The threshold for biochemical failure as defined by the ASTRO consensus definition (1997) was met in 4 (5%) patients after experiencing bounce as opposed to 19 (15%) non-bounce patients (p=0.01). The threshold for Phoenix (nadir +2 ng/mL) was met in 6 (7.5%) patients following bounce versus 22 (17%) of non-bounce patients (p=0.003). Both definitions are prone to false positive calls during bounce. Median PSA velocity during the bounce was 0.08 ng/mL/month (0.02-0.98) and was statistically significantly lower than the median velocity prior to the Phoenix biochemical failure at 0.28 ng/mL/month (0.07-2.04) (p=0.0005). CONCLUSION: PSA bounce is a common finding in our population and is associated with a lower rate of subsequent biochemical failure. The noted differences in PSA velocity will require verification in a future analysis to reduce the influence of median follow-up on this finding. Patients should be advised of the potential of bounce in PSA follow-up after permanent I(125) prostate brachytherapy and physicians involved in follow-up of prostate brachytherapy patients should be aware of this phenomenon, allowing them to commit to appropriate PSA surveillance, avoiding the premature and inappropriate initiation of salvage therapy during PSA bounce.     

Ten-year biochemical relapse-free survival after external beam radiation and brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer: the Seattle experience

PURPOSE: The role of external beam radiation therapy in addition to brachytherapy continues to be scrutinized for long term control of PSA levels after prostate cancer diagnosis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We report 10-year biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS) on 232 patients presenting with localized prostate cancer and consecutively treated with iodine(125) (I(125)) or palladium(103) (Pd(103)) brachytherapy and neoadjuvant external beam radiation therapy. Multivariate regression analysis was used to create a pretreatment clinical prognostic risk model using a modified ASTRO consensus definition (two consecutive rises in serum PSA) as the outcome. Gleason scoring was performed by pathologists at a small community hospital. Derived risk categories are the following: low = PSA 10 ng/mL or Gleason Score >or=7 or stage >or=T2c (1 intermediate risk factor); and high = 2 or more intermediate risk factors. Time to PSA failure (local, distant, or biochemical) was calculated and compared using Kaplan-Meier plots. RESULTS: Ten-year BRFS for the entire treatment group was 70%. Biochemical control rates by risk cohort analysis (95% confidence interval): low risk, 85% (83.3-90.7%); intermediate risk, 77% (73.0-84.5%); and high risk, 45% (45.4-57.2%). Using a risk grouping proposed by the Mt. Sinai group, the BRFS was: low risk, 84%; intermediate risk, 93%; and high risk, 57%. Grouping by the risk classification used by D'Amico, the BRFS was: low risk, 86%; intermediate risk, 90%; and high risk, 48%. CONCLUSIONS: I(125) or Pd(103) brachytherapy, as a boost combined with EBRT, continues to result in high rates of biochemical control at 10 years. Different risk group classification schemes lead to different BRFS results.     

A comparison of external beam radiation therapy versus radical prostatectomy for patients with low risk prostate carcinoma diagnosed, staged, and treated at a single institution

BACKGROUND: The authors retrospectively reviewed their institution's long term experience treating a group of comparably staged low risk prostate carcinoma patients with either radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy (RT) to determine whether the method of treatment resulted in significant differences in biochemical control and/or survival. METHODS: From January of 1987 through December of 1994, 382 patients (157 who underwent radical prostatectomy and 225 who received external beam RT) were treated with curative intent for localized prostate carcinoma at William Beaumont Hospital. All patients had a pretreatment serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) level < or =10.0 ng/mL and a biopsy Gleason score or =0.2 ng/mL at any time after prostatectomy. For RT patients, biochemical failure was defined according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel definition. Pretreatment PSA levels and Gleason scores were not significantly different between patients treated with radical prostatectomy or RT. The median follow-up in each treatment group was 5.5 years. RESULTS: The 7-year actuarial rates of biochemical control and cause specific survival were not significantly different between patients treated either with radical prostatectomy or RT (67% vs. 69% for biochemical control and 99% vs. 97% for cause specific survival, respectively). A number of clinical, pathologic, and treatment-related factors were analyzed for an association with biochemical failure (i.e., age, pretreatment PSA, Gleason score, and treatment modality). Only pretreatment PSA and Gleason score were significantly related to outcome in both univariate and multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Low risk prostate carcinoma patients with similar pretreatment PSA levels and biopsy Gleason scores treated at the same institution with either radical prostatectomy or RT achieved similar 7-year rates of biochemical control and cause specific survival, regardless of treatment technique. These findings suggest that for patients with pretreatment PSA levels 相似文献   

Defining the appropriate radiation dose for pretreatment PSA < or = 10 ng/mL prostate cancer

PURPOSE: To investigate whether a dose response exists for biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED) control in prostate cancer patients with pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < or = 10 ng/mL and to identify the patient subgroups affected. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 5/89 and 10/97, 488 T1-T3 NX-0 M0 prostate cancer patients with PSA < or = 10 ng/mL were treated with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) alone. Median and mean pretreatment PSA values were 6.3 and 6.2, respectively. Gleason scores of 2-6 and 7-10 were noted in 386 and 102 men, respectively. AJCC 1992 palpation T1-T2AB tumors were noted in 415 patients. Perineural invasion (PNI) was noted in 60 men. Mean and median age was 67 and 68 years, respectively. Dose to the center of the prostate ranged from 6260 cGy to 8409 cGy with a mean and median of 7423 cGy and 7278 cGy, respectively. Patients were stratified into three groups according to dose: <7250 cGy, 7250-7599 cGy, and > or =7600 cGy. Median dose in these three groups was 7067 cGy, 7278 cGy, and 7734 cGy, respectively. Univariate analysis was performed to determine differences in bNED control (American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology [ASTRO] Consensus Guidelines definition of failure) by dose group for the entire cohort, for 310 good prognosis patients (T1-T2A, Gleason score 2-6, absence of PNI), and for 178 poor prognosis patients (T2B-T3 or Gleason score 7-10 or presence of PNI) (1). Multivariate analysis (MVA) was performed to determine if dose was an independent predictor of bNED control. Median follow-up was 36 months. RESULTS: A dose response was not demonstrated for the entire group of patients with pretreatment PSA < or =10 ng/mL. Doses of <7250 cGy, 7250-7599 cGy, and > or =7600 cGy were associated with 5-year bNED control rates of 73%, 86%, and 89%, respectively (p = 0.12). MVA demonstrated prognosis group (p = 0. 038) to be the only independent predictor of bNED control. Good prognosis patients had a 5-year bNED of 85% and no dose response was seen. The subgroup of poor prognosis patients demonstrated a 5-year bNED control rate of 81% and a dose response was seen for those receiving > or =7600 cGy, compared to the two lower dose groups (94% vs. 75% vs. 70%; p = 0.0062). MVA for the poor prognosis subset demonstrated dose (p = 0.01) to be the only independent predictor for improved bNED control. CONCLUSIONS: The poor prognosis subset of PSA < or =10 ng/mL prostate cancer patients benefit from dose escalation. A dose response is not demonstrated for prostate cancer patients with pretreatment PSA < or =10 ng/mL and other favorable features.     

Five-year biochemical outcome and toxicity with transperineal CT-planned permanent I-125 prostate implantation for patients with localized prostate cancer

Purpose: To report the 5-year prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relapse-free survival outcome and incidence of long-term morbidity for patients with localized prostate cancer treated with CT-planned permanent I-125 prostate implantation using a transperineal technique (TPI).

Methods and Materials: Between 1989–1996, 248 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated with TPI. The median age was 65 years (range: 45–80 years). The clinical stage was T1c in 143 patients (58%), Stage T2a in 102 (41%), and T2b in 3 (1%). Thirty patients (12%) had Gleason scores <6, 158 patients (64%) had Gleason scores of 6, and 60 (24%) had scores ≥7. The median pretreatment PSA was 7 ng/mL (range: 1–58 ng/mL). The median prescribed implant dose was 150 Gy. Patients were characterized as having favorable risk disease if their pretreatment PSA level was ≤10.0 ng/mL and Gleason score ≤6; those with one and two adverse prognostic features (PSA > 10 ng/mL and Gleason score >6) were classified as having intermediate and unfavorable risk disease, respectively. PSA relapse was defined according to the American Society of Therapeutic Radiation Oncology Consensus Statement, and toxicity was scored according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group morbidity scoring scale. The median follow-up was 48 months (range: 12–126 months).

Results: Thirty-eight patients (15%) developed a PSA relapse, and the overall 5-year PSA relapse-free survival (PRFS) rate was 71%. The 5-year PRFS rates for favorable-risk (n = 146), intermediate-risk (n = 85), and unfavorable-risk (n = 17) patients were 88%, 77%, and 38%, respectively (p < 0.0001). The 5-year PRFS rates among patients treated with a 2-month course of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation (NAAD) prior to TPI compared to patients treated with TPI only were 100% and 77%, respectively (p = 0.03). Multivariate analysis identified pretreatment PSA > 10 ng/mL and Gleason score >6 as independent predictors for biochemical relapse after TPI. The 5-year actuarial likelihood of late Grade 2 urinary toxicity was 41%. The 5-year likelihood of urethral stricture development was 10%, and the median time to stricture development was 18 months. One patient (0.4%) in the early phase of this clinical experience developed a Grade 4 urethral complication. The actuarial incidence of late Grade 2 rectal bleeding was 9%. One patient (0.4%) developed a Grade 4 rectal complication.

Conclusions: Especially for favorable risk disease, the 5-year biochemical outcome with this approach was excellent and appears to be comparable to other therapeutic interventions. Grade 2 urinary symptoms were common in these patients but gradually resolved in most. Improved treatment planning approaches that further constrain the urethral dose without compromising the target volume dose will likely decrease the incidence of Grade 2 and 3 urinary symptoms after TPI.     

Cryosurgical ablation of the prostate: high risk patient outcomes

BACKGROUND: The authors report their experience with cryosurgical ablation of the prostate in men with high-risk features for prostate carcinoma who were unwilling to undergo radical surgery or radiation therapy. METHODS: Between January 1998 and April 2002, 65 men underwent primary cryosurgery for prostate carcinoma with high-risk features. All patients had biopsy-proven prostate carcinoma without evidence for metastatic disease on magnetic resonance images, computed tomography scans, or radionuclide images of bones. High-risk parameters were defined as either a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level >/= 10 ng/mL, or a Gleason sum score >/= 8, or both. Patients who had undergone prior surgery, radiation therapy, or cryoablation for prostate carcinoma were excluded from the study. Patients were monitored with physical examination and PSA screening every 3 months and with radiologic imaging when indicated. RESULTS: The median patient age was 72 years (range, 41-86 years), and t he median follow-up was 35 months (range, 4-77 months). There were 2 patients (3.1%) with rectal pain and incontinence. Durable PSA biochemical disease-free survival was noted in 83.3% of patients according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) criteria. A 6-year Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed an 81.7% ASTRO survival probability as well as PSA nadir < 4.0 ng/mL and PSA nadir < 1.0 ng/mL projections of 50% and 35%, respectively. One of 8 postcryosurgery biopsies (12.5%) were positive. No patient had progressed at last follow-up, and the overall survival rate was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Cryoablation was a feasible treatment option in patients with organ-confined prostate carcinoma who had high-risk features. Longer follow-up will be necessary to determine the effectiveness of this approach.