Phase I trial of fixed dose rate infusion gemcitabine with gefitinib in patients with pancreatic carcinoma

Purpose: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of gemcitabine using a fixed dose rate infusion (FDRI) in combination with gefitinib in patients (pts) with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PCa). Patients and methods: Patients with advanced PCa were given gemcitabine at the FDRI of 10 mg/m²/min IV on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Dose levels of 1000, 1200, and 1500 mg/m² were evaluated. Oral gefitinib 250 mg was given daily. DLTs were defined as 2 instances of Grade 3 hematologic or 4 nonhematologic or any Grade 4 hematologic toxicity. At least 4 patients were treated at each dose level. Dose escalation occurred in the absence of DLTs. Results: Five women and 8 men were enrolled. Median age was 59 and performance status 1. All had metastatic disease. Four patients received prior adjuvant chemoradiation for PCa, and one chemotherapy for lung cancer. Median cycles were 4 per patient. The MTD was 1,200 mg/m². Toxicity was predominantly hematologic. At 1,500 mg/m², 1 patient had Grade 4 granulocytopenia and 3 patients Grade 3 granulocytopenia. Overall, 8 patients (60 percent) developed Grade 1 or 2 acneiform rashes. One patient had Grade 3 vomiting; no significant diarrhea or liver toxicity was seen. There were no objective responses seen. Median time to progression and overall survival were 4.57 months and 7.13 months, respectively. Conclusion: Combining FDRI gemcitabine with gefitinib is feasible and tolerable. The recommended dose of gemcitabine is 1,200 mg/m² when used with gefitinib 250 mg daily.     

A phase 1 study of fixed dose rate gemcitabine and irinotecan in patients with advanced pancreatic and biliary cancer

BACKGROUND: The combination of a fixed dose rate (FDR) infusion of gemcitabine and irinotecan may have a synergistic effect in the treatment of patients with advanced and metastatic pancreatic and biliary cancer. The current study was conducted to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination. METHODS: There were 32 patients with metastatic pancreatic and advanced unresectable/metastatic biliary adenocarcinoma who were entered into this open-label, phase 1 dose escalation trial. Gemcitabine was administered at an FDR of 10 mg/m(2)/minute intravenously (iv). Irinotecan was administered iv over 60 minutes after gemcitabine. Both gemcitabine and irinotecan were given on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. RESULTS: The MTD of the combination was gemcitabine at an FDR of 1200 mg/m(2) and irinotecan at a dose of 100 mg/m(2). The DLTs were neutropenia and neutropenic fever. Other DLTs included diarrhea, dehydration, and fatigue. Two patients developed deep venous thrombosis during the treatment. The efficacy of the combination was encouraging, even at the lower dose levels. Of 30 assessable patients, there was 1 complete response, 6 partial responses, and 16 patients with stable disease, with a response rate of 23%, a disease control rate of 76%, a median progression-free survival of 4.7 months, and a median overall survival of 7.0 months. The average number of treatment cycles received was 11. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended doses of the combination for future study are gemcitabine at an FDR of 1200 mg/m(2) and irinotecan at a dose of 100 mg/m(2). The efficacy of the combination is encouraging. Further assessment of the combination with or without biologic agents is suggested.     

Phase II trial of weekly 24-hour infusion of gemcitabine in patients with advanced gallbladder and biliary tract carcinoma

Background  

Patients with advanced gallbladder and biliary tract carcinoma face a dismal prognosis, as no effective palliative chemotherapy exists. The antitumor effect of gemcitabine is schedule-dependent rather than dose-dependent. We evaluated the activity of a prolonged infusion of gemcitabine in advanced gallbladder and biliary tract carcinomas.     

A phase II trial of gemcitabine in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND: There is no effective systemic therapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. A recent trial reported a moderate antitumor activity for gemcitabine among Asian patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. This led to our examination of the efficacy and tolerability of the drug in a population of U.S. patients. METHODS: Thirty patients with measurable, unresectable, or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma who had received at least one previous form of systemic therapy were enrolled. All patients were required to have adequate major organ function and performance status. Patients received gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2) intravenously over 30 minutes weekly) for 3 consecutive weeks followed by a 1-week rest. Patients were assessed radiographically every 8 weeks. RESULTS: All 30 patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. Ninety cycles of therapy were administered (median 2, range 1-8). No complete or partial responses were observed. Nine patients (30%) had stable disease (median duration 7.4 months, range 2-17). Median survival for all 30 patients was 6.9 months (95% confidence interval, 4.5-13.5) and the 1-year survival rate was 40%. Mild hematologic toxicity occurred. Two patients (7%) developed Grade 4 neutropenia and one patient (3%) experienced Grade 3 thrombocytopenia. There were no episodes of febrile neutropenia. One patient who had previously undergone orthotopic liver transplantation developed hemolytic-uremic syndrome that resolved with discontinuation of chemotherapy and plasmapheresis. CONCLUSIONS: Although generally well tolerated, gemcitabine had minimal effect in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.     

Phase II study of weekly docetaxel and fixed dose rate gemcitabine in patients with previously treated advanced soft tissue and bone sarcoma

Purpose  

The purpose of this prospective multicenter phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of weekly docetaxel and fixed dose rate gemcitabine in patients with previously treated advanced soft tissue and bone sarcoma.     

Phase II study of gemcitabine in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine in patients with chemotherapy-na?ve, advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with unresectable and nonembolizable HCC who had received no prior systemic chemotherapy and with objectively measurable tumors, adequate liver and renal function, and adequate bone marrow reserve were enrolled on this study. The therapy consisted of gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) intravenously over 30 minutes weekly in an outpatient clinic. One course of treatment included three consecutive weekly infusions of gemcitabine and a 1-week rest. Treatment courses were repeated every 4 weeks for a total of six courses unless there was prior evidence of progressive disease. RESULTS: All 28 patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. A partial response (PR) was achieved in 5 patients, for an overall response rate of 17.8% (95% confidence interval, 2.7-32.9%). Seven patients had stable disease (25%), and 16 patients had disease progression (57.2%). The median survival for all 28 patients was 18. 7 weeks, and, for those patients who achieved a PR, it was 34.7 weeks. The median time to progression was 12 weeks. National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3-4 toxicity consisted primarily of leucopenia (10.7%), anemia (14.3%), thrombocytopenia (10.7%), and hepatotoxicity (14.3%). The spectrum of both hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity was mild, with thrombocytopenia constituting the dose-limiting side effect. CONCLUSIONS: Gemcitabine shows marginal antitumor activity in patients with advanced HCC, although the response duration is short-lived. Gemcitabine seems to be particularly promising because of its low toxicity profile. Further studies in combination with other active agents are warranted.     

Phase II study of single-agent gemcitabine in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer

Purpose: This phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of single-agent gemcitabine in patients with advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer. Patients and methods: Gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m² was administered as an intravenous 30-min infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 for every 28 days. Results: Forty chemonaive patients with a median age of 61 (range 33–73) were enrolled, and all 40 patients were involved in efficacy and safety analyses. Seven (17.5%) achieved partial response; 15 (37.5%) had stable disease; 17 (42.5%) had progressive disease; and 1 (2.5%) was not evaluated. The median survival time was 7.6 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 25.0%. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 12 patients (30.0%), leukopenia in five patients (12.5%), and anemia in four patients (10.0%). The most common grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities were elevated ALT (15.0%) and elevated γ-GTP (12.5%). One patient had grade 4 hemolytic uremic syndrome and recovered after discontinuation of gemcitabine. Conclusions: In single-agent therapy, gemcitabine demonstrated moderate efficacy with manageable toxicity in patients with advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer. Further evaluations are warranted, including the exact impact of gemcitabine on the management of advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer.     

Phase II clinical trial of induction chemotherapy with fixed dose rate gemcitabine and cisplatin followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Purpose

5-FU-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has been the mainstay of treatment for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) for the past decades, but the prognosis remains dismal.

Methods

Patients with pathologically confirmed LAPC of the pancreas, an ECOG PS of 0?C2 and no prior chemo- or radiotherapy were eligible. The treatment consisted of induction (IND) chemotherapy with a fixed dose rate gemcitabine 1,000?mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and CDDP 60?mg/m2 on day 1 every 3?weeks for 3 cycles. Subsequently, the patients without progression received CRT of 55.8?Gy/31 fractions with capecitabine 650?mg/m2 twice daily. Gemcitabine was given for 3 cycles after CRT. The primary endpoint was time to progression.

Results

Thirty-seven patients with LAPC were enrolled. Median age was 55?years, there were 20 males and 17 females, and ECOG PS was 0 in 6 and 1 in 31. Three patients (9.7?%) achieved partial responses after IND chemotherapy. Twenty-five patients received CRT with a mean radiation dose of 54.0?Gy, with one additional patient achieving a partial response. The median time to progression was 7.2?months (95?% CI, 4.4?C10), and the median overall survival was 16.8?months (95?% CI, 12.9?C20.7). The grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (29?%/6.5?%), thrombocytopenia (3.2?%/0?%) and anemia (9.7?%/0?%) during the IND phase and grade 3 neutropenia and diarrhea occurring in one and two patients during CRT phase.

Conclusions

IND chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin followed by CRT with capecitabine and maintenance gemcitabine was well tolerated and exhibited promising efficacy for the treatment of LAPC.     

A phase I trial of fixed dose rate gemcitabine and capecitabine in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has modest response rates to chemotherapy with gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Fixed dose rate gemcitabine infusion leads to enhanced intracellular accumulation of drug and possible augmented clinical effect. To determine the toxicity of this combination therapy in metastatic RCC, a Phase I trial was conducted. METHODS: Patients with metastatic RCC were enrolled in a Phase I dose escalation trial. Patients received fixed dose rate gemcitabine on Days 1, 8, and 15 in combination with capecitabine, an oral 5-FU analog, given on Days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle. RESULTS: Nine patients were enrolled at one of two dose levels. The initial dose level produced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), including prominent palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (hand-foot syndrome). A modified second dose level also resulted in DLT, precluding further study. No central nervous system (CNS) toxicity was observed in three patients with CNS metastases. Two patients demonstrated an objective partial response. CONCLUSIONS: Fixed dose rate gemcitabine in combination with capecitabine produced unacceptable toxicity in patients with advanced RCC. Further development of this schedule in RCC cannot be recommended.     

Phase II trial of gemcitabine in advanced sarcomas

BACKGROUND: Care for patients with advanced sarcomas is mainly palliative. Gemcitabine, a nucleoside antimetabolite, is an analog of deoxycytidine that has shown antitumor activity in several tumors. The aim of the current study was to determine the clinical activity of gemcitabine in patients with sarcomas. METHODS: The authors evaluated gemcitabine in patients with histologically confirmed sarcomas; one prior exposure to chemotherapy treatment was allowed. Prior radiation was allowed if given to non-indicator lesions. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) intravenously over 30 minutes, every week x three, cycles repeated q28 days. RESULTS: Twenty nine of 30 patients were evaluable; one patient refused to initiate study treatment. The mean age was 50 years (range, 22-81 years); 59% were male, and 35% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 (vs. 1 or 2). Patients were histologically classified as leiomyosarcoma (seven gastrointestinal, four retroperitoneal, two inferior vena caval, three of the extremity, and two uterine), synovial (two patients), malignant fibrous histiocytoma (two patients), fibrosarcoma (one patient), osteosarcoma (two patients), liposarcoma (one patient), hemangiosarcoma (one patient), or giant cell (one patient). Patients received an average of two cycles (range, one to eight). Eighty three percent of patients discontinued treatment due to progression and 14% due to toxicity/refusal. Hematologic toxicities >or= Grade 3 were seen in 32% of patients and consisted of leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. Anorexia (Grade 1/2 in 6 patients, Grade 3 in 1 patient), nausea (Grade 1/2 in 7 patients, Grade 3 in 1 patient), and lethargy (Grade 1/2 in 19 patients) were the most frequently observed nonhematologic toxicities. One patient experienced Grade 3 edema and muscle infarction. A different patient experienced unexplained Grade 3 chest pain. One partial response was observed in a uterine leiomyosarcoma patient lasting at least three months. Overall response rate was 3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0-15). Median time -to progression was 2.1 months (95% CI: 1.8-3.0). CONCLUSIONS: The current gemcitabine regimen demonstrated acceptable levels of toxicity, but it failed to produce the number of responses needed to justify expansion of the current study. This regimen is not recommended for advanced sarcomas.     

Prospective phase II trial of a combination of fixed dose rate infusion of gemcitabine with cisplatin and UFT as a first-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma

PURPOSE: The standard chemotherapy for non-elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is platinum-based doublet combination therapy. Preclinical and clinical evidence indicates that infusion at the fixed dose rate (FDR) of 10mg/(m(2)min) may be more effective than a standard 30-min infusion of gemcitabine. In addition, oral uracil-tegafur (UFT) was associated with a survival advantage in the adjuvant setting. Therefore, we performed a phase II study using the combination of gemcitabine, cisplatin and UFT as first-line therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IIIB or IV NSCLC with a performance status of 0-2 and were chemotherapy-naive. Gemcitabine (1,250 mg/m(2), 10mg/(m(2)min) on days 1 and 8, respectively) and cisplatin (75 mg/m(2) on day 1) were injected intravenously and UFT (400mg/day) was administered orally on days 1-14. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks for up to six cycles. Primary endpoint was overall response rate and secondary endpoints were overall survival, time to progression and safety profile. RESULT: Thirty-seven patients were enrolled. The median age was 60 years (range: 44-72 years). The performance status was 0 in 4, 1 in 30, and 2 in 3 patients. Twenty-three patients completed six cycles. Complete response was achieved in one (3%) patient, partial response in 17 (46%) patients, and stable disease in 10 (27%) patients. The overall response rate was 48.6% on an intention-to-treat basis and 54.5% of patients in whom a response evaluation was possible (n=33). The median survival time was 14.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.2-18.2), the 1-year survival rate was 54% and the median time to progression was 5.4 months (95% CI 4.3-6.4). Toxicities were moderate and mostly hematological adverse events. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 37% of patients and four patients experienced febrile neutropenia. Grade 3/4 anemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 19% and 5% of patients, respectively. Non-hematological toxicities were mild. CONCLUSION: The combination of gemcitabine, cisplatin and UFT is an active and well-tolerated first-line regimen in patients with advanced NSCLC.     

A Phase II trial of topotecan and gemcitabine in patients with previously treated,advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Multiple trials have been performed to evaluate second-line clinical chemotherapy in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). However, no single agent or combination has demonstrated superior activity. METHODS: Patients with advanced NSCLC who had already received one chemotherapeutic regimen were treated with topotecan (0.75 mg/m(2) over 30 minutes, Days 1-5) and gemcitabine (400 mg/m(2) over 30 minutes, Days 1 and 5) every 21 days. RESULTS: Of 35 patients who were treated, 4 (11%) achieved a partial responses and 8 (23%) hadstable disease for at least four courses of treatment. The response rate for patients with refractory disease (progressing during frontline chemotherapy) was 18% (3 of 17) with 18% having stable disease for at least four courses of treatment. The median survival of the entire group was 7 months (range, 1.5-44 months) and 20% (7 of 35) of patients were alive 1 year from the initiation of topotecan and gemcitabine treatment. Patients with refractory disease had a median survival of 4(1/2) months, with 6-month and 1-year survival rates of 47% and 18%, respectively. During Course 1, five patients (14%) developed Grade IV neutropenia and three patients (9%) developed Grade IV thrombocytopenia. Nonhematologic toxicity was relatively mild, with one patient developing Grade III side effects (fatigue) and eight patients (23%) developing Grade II nonhematologic side effects. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of topotecan and gemcitabine demonstrated antitumor activity with a modest side effect profile in patients with advanced, previously treated NSCLC.     

Phase II trial of gemcitabine combined with cisplatin in patients with inoperable biliary tract carcinomas

Objectives The aim of this phase II study was to evaluate the response rate to gemcitabine combined with cisplatin in patients with locally advanced, metastatic or recurrent biliary tract cancer who had received no prior chemotherapy. Methods The treatment consisted of cisplatin 70 mg/m² in intravenous infusion followed by gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m² in 30-min intravenous infusion on days 1 and 8, repeated every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, patient’s refusal or up to 8 cycles. Results Thirty-nine patients with advanced biliary cancer were enrolled between March 2003 and August 2003. Fourteen patients (40%) had gall bladder cancer and 20 patients (57%) had cholangiocarcinoma. Thirty-two patients (91%) had metastatic disease at study entry with liver being the most commonly involved site of metastasis. About 84.5 and 94.2% of the initially planned dose were administered for gemcitabine and cisplatin, respectively. In the ITT population (n = 35), six partial responses were observed for an objective response rate of 17.1% (95% CI; 4.7–29.6%). Ten patients (28.6%) had stable disease, 16 (45.7%) progressed, and three (8.6%) were not evaluable. For the 35 patients in the ITT population, the median overall survival time was 8.6 months (95% CI; 6.1–10.4 months). The median time to disease progression was 3.2 months (95% CI; 2.3–4.9 months) and the median time to treatment failure was 3.1 months (95% CI; 1.9–4.1 months). Among the six tumor responders, the median duration of tumor response was 7.3 months (95% CI; 5.6–11.0 months). The most common grade 3/4 maximum toxicities were nausea (3.4%) and vomiting (2.7%). Conclusion The combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin in this trial demonstrated moderate antitumor activity with favorable toxicity profile. Supported by Korean Cancer Study Group.     

Phase I study of fixed dose rate infusion of gemcitabine in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the feasible dose of gemcitabine when administered as a fixed dose rate infusion (10 mg/m(2)/min) on a weekly schedule to Japanese patients with unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Patients were required to have histologically or cytologically proven locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer for which they had received no previous chemotherapy. Gemcitabine was administered intravenously weekly for three consecutive weeks every 4 weeks. Patients at three dose levels were scheduled to receive escalating doses of gemcitabine: 1000 mg/m(2) over 100 min (Level 1), 1200 mg/m(2) over 120 min (Level 2) and 1500 mg/m(2) over 150 min (Level 3). RESULTS: A total of 16 patients were enrolled in this study between December 2003 and September 2004. Maximum-tolerated dose was not reached during the first course. Dose-limiting toxicity was Grade 4 neutropenia. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was observed at Level 3 in all six patients in the first course, and administration of gemcitabine on Day 8 or 15 was skipped in all six patients. Non-hematologic toxicity was mild and the most common symptoms were anorexia, nausea and vomiting. Partial response was achieved in 1 of the 17 patients (7%). Median overall survival was 7.3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Gemcitabine administered at a rate of 10 mg/m(2)/min was tolerated up to 1500 mg/m(2), but 1200 mg/m(2) represented a more appropriate recommended dose in further studies owing to neutropenia in Japanese patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.     

A phase I trial of fixed dose rate gemcitabine plus capecitabine in metastatic cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Capecitabine and gemcitabine given as fixed dose rate (FDR) has not been demonstrated to be well tolerated in phase I previous studies. The goals of this phase I study were to determine the maximum-tolerated dose of this combination and to describe the dose-limiting toxic effects (DLT) and the safety profile of this way of administration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors were eligible for this study. Capecitabine was administered orally at a dose of 650 mg/m(2) bis in die (b.i.d.) for 14 consecutive days. Gemcitabine was administered at FDR of 10 mg/m(2) per min in escalating durations of infusion on days 1 and 8. The cycles were repeated every 21 days. RESULTS: All 20 patients enrolled into the study were assessable for toxicity. Only one out of the first six patients treated at FDR gemcitabine dose of 800 mg/m(2) met protocol-specified DLT criteria (grade 4 neutropenia lasting >or=7 days) during the first two cycles. At these doses the majority of cycles of therapy were, however, delivered without dose reduction or delay. Another similar episode of DLT was observed at the same dose step among the following eight included patients. The dose of FDR gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) in 80 min on days 1 and 8 plus capecitabine 650 mg/m(2) b.i.d., for 14 consecutive days followed by 1 week of rest is recommended for further study. CONCLUSION: The combination of FDR gemcitabine plus capecitabine can be administered with acceptable toxicity. The evidence of antitumor activity deserves further investigation in phase II combination chemotherapy studies.     

Phase II trial of bevacizumab plus gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays a key role in the biology and prognosis of pancreatic cancer. Inhibitors of VEGF suppress the growth of pancreatic cancer in preclinical models. The objectives of this phase II study were to assess the response rate and overall survival of pancreatic cancer patients who received gemcitabine with the recombinant humanized anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody bevacizumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with previously untreated advanced pancreatic cancer received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) intravenously over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. Bevacizumab, 10 mg/kg, was administered after gemcitabine on days 1 and 15. Tumor measurements were assessed every two cycles. Plasma VEGF levels were obtained pretreatment. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were enrolled at seven centers between November 2001 and March 2004. All patients had metastatic disease, and 83% had liver metastases. Eleven patients (21%) had confirmed partial responses, and 24 (46%) had stable disease. The 6-month survival rate was 77%. Median survival was 8.8 months; median progression-free survival was 5.4 months. Pretreatment plasma VEGF levels did not correlate with outcome. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities included hypertension in 19% of the patients, thrombosis in 13%, visceral perforation in 8%, and bleeding in 2%. CONCLUSION: The combination of bevacizumab plus gemcitabine is active in advanced pancreatic cancer patients. Additional study is warranted. A randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine plus bevacizumab versus gemcitabine plus placebo is ongoing in the Cancer and Leukemia Group B.     

Phase II trial of cisplatin and gemcitabine in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: This phase II study was performed to determine the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin and gemcitabine in patients with advanced gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty chemo-na?ve patients with measurable locoregionally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer were included; the median patient age was 53 years (range 35-71). Cisplatin was administered at a dose of 50 mg/m2, given in 1 h intravenously (i.v.) on days 1 and 8, followed after 24 h by gemcitabine at a dose of 800 mg/m2 given in 30 min i.v. on days 2, 9 and 16, every 28 days. RESULTS: A median number of four therapy cycles were given (range 2-8). Myelosuppresion was the most important toxicity. Grade 3-4 thrombopenia was observed in 19 patients (48%) and grade 3-4 leukopenia was observed in 23 (58%). Myelotoxicity was cumulative and caused omission of gemcitabine on day 16 in 55% of cycles. Non-haematological toxicity consisted mainly of grade 1-2 nausea and vomiting. Objective responses were observed in 30% of patients including two complete remissions and 10 partial remissions. Median survival was 11 months (range 3-27+). CONCLUSIONS: This cisplatin-gemcitabine regimen had moderate efficacy in patients with advanced gastric cancer, with manageable toxicity. Further studies with this combination may be warranted.     

Phase II trial of edatrexate in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND:: The methotrexate analogue edatrexate (10-ethyl-10-deaza-aminopterin,or 10-EDAM) has demonstrated greater activity than methotrexatehas against murine tumors and human tumor xenografts. PhaseII trials of edatrexate have already demonstrated its activityagainst breast, lung, and head and neck carcinomas. A phaseII trial of edatrexate was conducted in patients with advancedhepatocellular carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS:: Seventeen patients with previously untreated unresectable hepatocellularcarcinoma were enrolled on the study. Edatrexate, 80 mg/m² weeklyfor 5 weeks, was administered intravenously. The treatment coursewas repeated every 6 weeks. Tumor response was evaluated bycomputerized tomographic scan after 2 courses. RESULTS:: No complete or partial responses were observed in this trial.Two minor responses, each lasting less than 12 weeks, were observed.Twelve patients had elevated serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levelsat entry into the study; 4 of the 12 patients experienced a> 25% decrease in the level of this tumor marker; 3 of die4 had a > 50% reduction in AFP level. Grade 3 and 4 toxiceffects were granulocytopenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, oralmucositis, skin reactions, fatigue, anorexia, and diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS:: Edatrexate administered at this dose and schedule appears tohave little therapeutic efficacy against advanced hepatocellularcarcinoma. edatrexate, 10-EDAM, antimetabolite, folate antagonist, methotrexate, hepatoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, alpha-fetoprotein     

Phase II trial of acivicin in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma

Acivicin, an amino acid antibiotic, was administered to 36 adult patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer. The starting dose for good-risk patients was 15 mg/m2/day day given as a short intravenous infusion on 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks. Patients previously treated with radiation therapy, mitomycin, or nitrosoureas and those with inadequate bone marrow reserve received 12 mg/m2 on the same schedule. In 33 evaluable patients, one partial response occurred. Sixteen patients had stable disease with a median time to disease progression of 15 weeks (range 9-27) and a median survival of 8 months. The median survival of the whole group was, however, less than 6 months. Myelotoxicity was mild and resulted in no significant complications. Nonhematological toxicity primarily consisted of nausea, vomiting, drowsiness, depression, and altered mentation. Acivicin given by this schedule is inactive at these dose levels in previously treated patients with colorectal carcinoma.     

Phase II study of fixed dose rate gemcitabine as radiosensitizer for newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme

Purpose

In order to evaluate the activity of gemcitabine as radiosensitizer for newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), a prospective single-center phase II study was conducted.

Methods

Eligible patients were required to have histologically proven GBM with evaluable and/or measurable disease after surgery. They were treated by standard cranial irradiation plus concomitant fixed dose rate gemcitabine given intravenously at 175 mg/m² weekly for 6 weeks. After chemo-radiotherapy, irrespective of tumor response, patients went on to receive oral temozolomide at 150–200 mg/m² for 5 days every 28 days.

Results

Twenty-three patients were enrolled. Median age was 57 years (range 43–72) and median Karnofsky performance status was 90 (range 70–100). Seventeen patients had received subtotal resection of the tumor, while six patients had biopsied-only tumors. Four patients responded to treatment (17.5%) with additional 14 (61%) experiencing stable disease for an overall disease control rate of 78.5%. Median progression-free and overall survival were 6.8 and 10.1 months, respectively. The concomitant radiotherapy–gemcitabine combination was well tolerated and severe adverse events were rare, consisting of grade 3 neutropenia and hypertransaminasemia in two cases each. Twenty patients were assessable for methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation, 11 of which were found methylated. In the methylated and unmethylated cohorts, disease control was obtained in 10/11 patients (91%) and 7/9 patients (77.5%), respectively.

Conclusions

Concomitant radiotherapy–gemcitabine is active and well tolerated in newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. Activity is observed both in tumors with methylated and unmethylated MGMT promoter.