Excess mortality following hip fracture: the role of underlying health status

Summary We evaluated the long-term excess mortality associated with hip fracture, using prospectively collected data on pre-fracture health and function from a nationally representative sample of U.S. elders. Although mortality was elevated for the first six months following hip fracture, we found no evidence of long-term excess mortality. Introduction The long-term excess mortality associated with hip fracture remains controversial. Methods To assess the association between hip fracture and mortality, we used prospectively collected data on pre-fracture health and function from a representative sample of U.S. elders in the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) to perform survival analyses with time-varying covariates. Results Among 25,178 MCBS participants followed for a median duration of 3.8 years, 730 sustained a hip fracture during follow-up. Both early (within 6 months) and subsequent mortality showed significant elevations in models adjusted only for age, sex and race. With additional adjustment for pre-fracture health status, functional impairments, comorbid conditions and socioeconomic status, however, increased mortality was limited to the first six months after fracture (hazard ratio [HR]: 6.28, 95% CI: 4.82, 8.19). No increased mortality was evident during subsequent follow-up (HR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.88, 1.23). Hip-fracture-attributable population mortality ranged from 0.5% at age 65 among men to 6% at age 85 among women. Conclusions Hip fracture was associated with substantially increased mortality, but much of the short-term risk and all of the long-term risk was explained by the greater frailty of those experiencing hip fracture.     

Predictors of mortality after hip fracture: a 10-year prospective study

The role of medical, social, and functional covariates on mortality after hip fracture was examined over a 16-year period. A total of 1109 patients with hip fractures were included in a prospective database. The inclusion criteria were patients who were age 65 years or older, ambulatory prior to fracture, cognitively intact, living in their own home at the time of the fracture, and had sustained a nonpathological femoral neck or intertrochanteric chip fracture. Data were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model. Mortality was compared with a standardized population, and standardized mortality ratios were calculated for 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10 years,respectively. The 1-, 2-, 5- and 10-year mortality rates were 11.9%, 18.5%, 41.2%, and 75.3%, respectively. The predictors of mortality were advanced age, male gender, high American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)classification, the presence of a major postoperative complication, a history of cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, a history of congestive heart failure,ambulating with an assistive device, or being a household ambulator prior to hip fracture. The increased mortality risk was highest during the first year after hip fracture and returned to the risk of the standard population 3 years postoperatively. Males who are 65 to 84 years had the highest mortality risk.     

Mortality After Hip Fracture in Austria 2008–2011

Osteoporosis-related hip fractures represent a substantial cause of mortality and morbidity in industrialized countries like Austria. Identification of groups at high risk for mortality after hip fracture is crucial for health policy decisions. To determine in-hospital, long-term, and excess mortality after osteoporosis-related hip fracture in Austrian patients, we conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of pseudonymized invoice data from Austrian social insurance authorities covering roughly 98 % of the entire population. The data set included 31,668 subjects aged 50 years and above sustaining a hip fracture between July 2008 and December 2010 with follow-up until June 2011, and an age-, gender-, and regionally matched control population without hip fractures (56,320 subjects). Kaplan–Meier and Cox hazard regression analyses served to determine unadjusted and adjusted mortality rates: Unadjusted all-cause 1-year mortality amounted to 20.2 % (95 % CI: 19.7–20.7 %). Males had significantly higher long-term, in-hospital, and excess mortality rates than females, but younger males exhibited lower excess mortality than their female counterparts. Advanced age correlated with increased long-term and in-hospital mortality, but lower excess mortality. Excess mortality, particularly in males, was highest in the first 6 months after hip fracture, but remained statistically significantly elevated throughout the observation period of 3 years. Longer hospital stay per fracture was correlated with mortality reduction in older patients and in patients with more subsequent fractures. In conclusion, more efforts are needed to identify causes and effectively prevent excess mortality especially in male osteoporosis patients.     

Mortality and Life Expectancy After hip Fractures

Follow-up data for at least 4 years was collected for 675 patients treated for hip fractures in the period 1961–1970. Compared with a series from the same hospital for the years 1948–1957 the number of patients had more than doubled and a higher hospital mortality was encountered, but the 4-year survival rate was unchanged. the mortality after hip fracture was found to be related to the age and sex of the patient and to the nature and number of associated diseases. the mortality rate was found to be high in the first 2 months following the fracture, but patients surviving the second month showed no excess mortality during the following 4 years, having the same life expectancy as the general population.     

Mortality and Life Expectancy After hip Fractures

Follow-up data for at least 4 years was collected for 675 patients treated for hip fractures in the period 1961-1970. Compared with a series from the same hospital for the years 1948-1957 the number of patients had more than doubled and a higher hospital mortality was encountered, but the 4-year survival rate was unchanged. the mortality after hip fracture was found to be related to the age and sex of the patient and to the nature and number of associated diseases. the mortality rate was found to be high in the first 2 months following the fracture, but patients surviving the second month showed no excess mortality during the following 4 years, having the same life expectancy as the general population.     

Excess mortality following hip fracture: a systematic epidemiological review

Summary This systematic literature review has shown that patients experiencing hip fracture after low-impact trauma are at considerable excess risk for death compared with nonhip fracture/community control populations. The increased mortality risk may persist for several years thereafter, highlighting the need for interventions to reduce this risk. Patients experiencing hip fracture after low-impact trauma are at considerable risk for subsequent osteoporotic fractures and premature death. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to identify all studies that reported unadjusted and excess mortality rates for hip fracture. Although a lack of consistent study design precluded any formal meta-analysis or pooled analysis of the data, we have shown that hip fracture is associated with excess mortality (over and above mortality rates in nonhip fracture/community control populations) during the first year after fracture ranging from 8.4% to 36%. In the identified studies, individuals experienced an increased relative risk for mortality following hip fracture that was at least double that for the age-matched control population, became less pronounced with advancing age, was higher among men than women regardless of age, was highest in the days and weeks following the index fracture, and remained elevated for months and perhaps even years following the index fracture. These observations show that patients are at increased risk for premature death for many years after a fragility-related hip fracture and highlight the need to identify those patients who are candidates for interventions to reduce their risk.     

Mortality following the first hip fracture in Norwegian women and men (1999–2008). A NOREPOS study

Hip fractures are associated with increased mortality and their incidence in Norway is one of the highest worldwide. The aim of this nationwide study was to examine short- and long-term mortality after hip fractures, burden of disease (attributable fraction and potential years of life lost), and time trends in mortality compared to the total Norwegian population. Information on incident hip fractures between 1999 and 2008 in all persons aged 50 years and older was collected from Norwegian hospitals. Death and emigration dates of the hip fracture patients were obtained through 31 December 2010. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated and Poisson regression analyses were used for the estimation of time trends in SMRs. Among the 81,867 patients with a first hip fracture, the 1-year excess mortality was 4.6-fold higher in men, and 2.8-fold higher in women compared to the general population. Although the highest excess mortality was observed during the first two weeks post fracture, the excess risk persisted for twelve years. Mortality rates post hip fracture were higher in men compared to women in all age groups studied. In both genders aged 50 years and older, approximately 5% of the total mortality in the population was related to hip fractures. The largest proportion of the potential life-years lost was in the relatively young-old, i.e. less than 80 years. In men, the 1-year absolute mortality rates post hip fracture declined significantly between 1999 and 2008, by contrast, the mortality in women increased significantly relatively to the population mortality.     

Mortality after low trauma hip fracture: a prospective cohort study

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Various risk of mortality due to hip fracture has been reported by different studies. There is scarce controlled study on hip fracture mortality from developing countries and no data from Middle East region. The objective of this study is to determine mortality and its risk factors one year after low trauma hip fracture. METHODS: One hundred and two patients after hip fracture not caused by high impact injuries or local bone diseases followed up prospectively for one year. Control group consisted of sex and age matched patients admitted to ophthalmology ward for eye surgery. Data about comorbidity obtained from both groups at baseline. Functional state and health-related quality of life for the participants were measured using RDRS-2 and SF-36 questionnaire, respectively. RESULTS: The overall survival was 83% in cases and 92% in controls (log rank test 3.62, df=1, P=0.057). Early mortality within the first 6 months of observation was significantly higher in patients than controls (13 in patients vs. 2 in controls) (log rank test 8.84, df=1, P=0.003). The risk of mortality was significantly and independently associated with age and baseline RDRS score. By the end of follow-up, in the patient group, 55.4% of survivors were able to walk without any assistance and 10.8% were not able to walk. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of mortality within the first 6 months of observation was significantly and independently associated with low trauma hip fracture. However, age and baseline RDRS score were independent predictors of mortality in the first year following hip fracture.     

Nonagenarian hip fractures: Morbidity and mortality at a single institution

ObjectivesThe incidence of hip fractures continues to rise dramatically, but few studies have examined these injuries in the population of individuals over 90 years of age, which is one of the fastest growing populations. We present the largest such study specifically examining hip fractures in the super-elderly.MethodsA review of 216 hip fracture patients over 90 years of age were examined for immediate postoperative complications and in-house, 30-day, and 1-year mortality.ResultsOverall 1-year mortality was 38.1%. Statistically-significant risk factors for 1-year mortality included oncologic fracture, dementia, and CHF. Fracture classification and hospital length of stay were associated with perioperative complications including anemia and pneumonia.ConclusionThe nonagenarian hip fracture is associated with a higher 1-year mortality than prior reported rates of mortality for elderly hip fractures. Factors previously reported to influence the risk of 1-year mortality in hip fractures are not observed in the super-elderly.     

Mortality and its risk factors in nonagenarians after hip fractures

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to assess mortality with a minimum of 2-year follow-up, related risk factors for mortality, and functional outcomes after surgical interventions in nonagenarian patients with hip fractures at the latest follow up.MethodsBetween June 2003 and November 2015, 260 nonagenarians (271 hips) with femoral neck and intertrochanteric fractures were included in this retrospective study. Cumulative mortality using the Kaplan-Meier method and risk factors for mortality using Cox proportional-hazards regression model were estimated. As functional outcome, ambulatory ability was assessed before injury and at the latest follow-up.ResultsSix-teen patients (16 hips) were lost to follow-up. The mean age at the time of surgery was 92.2 years (range 90–108 years). Mortality rates were 23.4% (57 of 244 patients) at 1 year and 40.6% (99 of 244 patients) at 2 years. Both genders had elevated standardized mortality ratio at 2-year post-fracture compared to that a 1-year post fracture. Multivariate analysis showed that American Society of Anesthesiologists (OR, 1.371; 95% CI, 1.021–1.843; P = 0.036) and time interval from trauma to operation (OR, 1.043; 95% CI, 1.002–1.086; P = 0.039) were significantly associated with risk of mortality. Of 58 patients alive, 13 patients (22.4%) had the same ambulatory ability before and after injury.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that mortality is higher in nonagenarians with hip fracture. Risk factors for mortality in nonagenarians with hip fracture are American Society of Anesthesiologists and time interval from trauma to operation. And, nonagenarians with hip fractures have lower rate of maintaining pre-injury ambulatory ability.     

The weekend effect for hip fracture surgery

IntroductionIncreased mortality rates have been reported for emergency admissions during weekends and outside office hours. Research on the weekend effect in hip fracture patients is however limited and demonstrates conflicting results. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of weekend admission and weekend surgery on 30-day and 1-year mortality following hip fracture surgery.Patients and methodsAll patients who underwent hip fracture surgery in our hospital between 2004 and 2015 were included in this retrospective study. Patient characteristics including age, gender, fracture type, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and length of stay were collected. Information on admission and surgery date and time of day was recorded, as were in-hospital, 30-day and 1-year mortality. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of 30-day and 1-year mortality.ResultsA total of 1803 patients were included, 546 patients (30.3%) were admitted during the weekend. Patient characteristics did not differ between weekday and weekend admissions. Surgical delay was less frequent in patients undergoing weekend surgery. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that older age, higher ASA score, higher NHFS and increased surgical delay were independently associated with 30-day mortality. One-year mortality was associated with age, gender, ASA score, CCI and surgical delay. Weekend admission and weekend surgery were not associated with increased 30-day or 1-year mortality.ConclusionsThere was no weekend effect for hip fracture patients in our study. These results indicate an adequate level of perioperative care outside weekday office hours within our health care system.     

Survival and Potential Years of Life Lost After Hip Fracture in Men and Age-matched Women

Hip fracture is associated with a higher mortality rate in men than in women. However, mean age of men and women with hip fracture differs markedly. Thus, some of the differences in the clinical pattern and outcome between genders could be related to different ages. To avoid the influence of age on gender-specific outcome, we analyzed prefracture conditions and hip fracture outcome in a cohort of men and of age-matched women. Risk factors for low bone mass were recorded in 106 men (mean age ± SD, 80.3 ± 9.3 years) and 264 age-matched women (mean age 81.4 ± 8.0) with hip fracture. We compared mortality rate, survival, years of potential life lost and modification of housing conditions. These outcomes were prospectively assessed during an average 3.6 years follow-up (up to 7 years). Men with hip fracture differed from age-matched hip-fractured women by a higher alcohol and tobacco consumption, a greater frequency of living in couple, and by less prevalent fractures. Mortality rate after hip fracture was significantly higher in men (RR = 1.74, 95% CI 1.34–2.24). Since mortality is higher in the general male population, we compared reduction in life expectancy taking into account the gender-specific mortality rate. The excess mortality in each age-group of hip-fractured patients, which was measured during the whole follow-up period, and is an estimate of death attributable to fracture, did not differ between genders. Reduction in life expectancy due to hip fracture was similar in both genders (5.9 ± 4.5 and 5.8 ± 4.8 years, in men and women, respectively; NS), but the proportion of the years of life lost was higher in men (70 ± 33%) than in women (59 ± 42%, p < 0.01). It was concluded that for the same age, mortality rate after hip fracture was higher in men than in women. Although the reduction in life expectancy was similar in both genders, the proportion of the years of life lost was higher in men, suggesting a worse impact of hip fracture on survival in men, even after consideration of the higher mortality rate in the general male population. Received: 9 October 2001 / Accepted: 22 April 2002     

Contralateral hip fractures and other osteoporosis-related fractures in hip fracture patients: incidence and risk factors. An observational cohort study of 1,229 patients

Purpose

To report risk factors, 1-year and overall risk for a contralateral hip and other osteoporosis-related fractures in a hip fracture population.

Methods

An observational study on 1,229 consecutive patients of 50?years and older, who sustained a hip fracture between January 2005 and June 2009. Fractures were scored retrospectively for 2005–2008 and prospectively for 2008–2009. Rates of a contralateral hip and other osteoporosis-related fractures were compared between patients with and without a history of a fracture. Previous fractures, gender, age and ASA classification were analysed as possible risk factors.

Results

The absolute risk for a contralateral hip fracture was 13.8?%, for one or more osteoporosis-related fracture(s) 28.6?%. First-, second- and third-year risk for a second hip fracture was 2, 1 and 0?%. Median (IQR) interval between both hip fractures was 18.5 (26.6) months. One-year incidence of other fractures was 6?%. Only age was a risk factor for a contralateral hip fracture, hazard ratio (HR) 1.02 (1.006–1.042, p?=?0.008). Patients with a history of a fracture (33.1?%) did not have a higher incidence of fractures during follow-up (16.7?%) than patients without fractures in their history (14?%). HR for a contralateral hip fracture for the fracture versus the non-fracture group was 1.29 (0.75–2.23, p?=?0.360).

Conclusion

The absolute risk of a contralateral hip fracture after a hip fracture is 13.8?%, the 1-year risk was 2?%, with a short interval between the 2 hip fractures. Age was a risk factor for sustaining a contralateral hip fracture; a fracture in history was not.     

Increased mortality in patients with a hip fracture-effect of pre-morbid conditions and post-fracture complications

Summary In a cohort of 169,145 patients with a hip fracture and 524,010 controls we observed an excess mortality among patients compared to controls for as long as 20 years after the hip fracture. The main reason for the excess mortality was linked to the trauma that caused the hip fracture. Introduction Patients with a hip fracture have a significant excess mortality. However, it remains unclear if the mortality is linked to the pre-morbid conditions or to complications to the fracture. Methods All subjects with a hip fracture in Denmark between 1977 and 2001 were compared with three age- and gender-matched subjects from the general population. Results A total of 169,145 fracture cases were compared to 524,010 controls. The cases had a much higher prevalence of co-morbidity than the controls. The mortality rate was twice as high in fracture cases compared with controls (HR = 2.26, 95% CI: 2.24–2.27). Adjustments for confounders only changed the excess mortality risk little. The mortality after the hip fracture was divided into two categories: an excess mortality of 19% within the first year following the fracture (relative survival = 0.81 compared to controls), and an excess mortality of 1.8% per year (relative survival 0.982) for every additional year following the fracture. The major causes of the excess mortality were due to complications to the fracture event (70.8% within the first 30 days). Conclusions Patients with a hip fracture have a pronounced excess mortality risk. The major cause was linked to the fracture event and not to pre-existing co-morbidity.     

Measurements of knee rotation-reliability of an external device in vivo

Background

The high mortality of hip fracture patients is well documented, but sex- and cause-specific mortality after hip fracture has not been extensively studied. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate mortality and cause of death in patients after hip fracture surgery and to compare their mortality and cause of death to those in the general population.

Methods

Records of 428 consecutive hip fracture patients were collected on a population-basis and data on the general population comprising all Finns 65 years of age or older were collected on a cohort-basis. Cause of death was classified as follows: malignant neoplasms, dementia, circulatory disease, respiratory disease, digestive system disease, and other.

Results

Mean follow-up was 3.7 years (range 0-9 years). Overall 1-year postoperative mortality was 27.3% and mortality after hip fracture at the end of the follow-up was 79.0%. During the follow-up, age-adjusted mortality after hip fracture surgery was higher in men than in women with hazard ratio (HR) 1.55 and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.21-2.00. Among hip surgery patients, the most common causes of death were circulatory diseases, followed by dementia and Alzheimer's disease. After hip fracture, men were more likely than women to die from respiratory disease, malignant neoplasm, and circulatory disease. During the follow-up, all-cause age- and sex-standardized mortality after hip fracture was 3-fold higher than that of the general population and included every cause-of-death category.

Conclusion

During the study period, the risk of mortality in hip fracture patients was 3-fold higher than that in the general population and included every major cause of death.     

Analysis of factors among 30-day and 1-year mortality rates in patients with borderline stable-unstable intertrochanteric hip fracture

ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the possible effects of surgical procedures on mortality and to identify the possible risk factors for mortality in the management of geriatric hip fractures.MethodsA total of 191 patients (105 women and 86 men; mean age 82.26±9.681 [60–108] years) with AO/OTA 31A2.2 intertrochanteric fractures and treated with sliding hip screw, proximal femoral nail, or hemiarthroplasty were included in this retrospective cohort study. The treatment type was decided by the responsible surgeon according to the patients’ pre-injury activity level, bone quality, and features of the fracture. Age, sex, type of fracture, type of surgery performed, American society of anesthesiology (ASA) grade, type of anesthesia, time to surgery, type of physical therapy, length of hospital stay, and number of comorbidities were documented. We evaluated the 30-day and 1-year mortality of patients treated with sliding hip screw (SHS), proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFN-A), or hemiarthroplasty and identified the possible risk factors for mortality.ResultsA total of 49 patients underwent SHS, 58 underwent PFN-A, and 84 underwent hemiarthroplasty. Of these, 2 patients with SHS, 2 with PFN-A, and 11 with hemiarthroplasty died within 30 days after surgery, whereas 7 patients with SHS, 15 with PFN-A, and 23 with hemiarthroplasty died 1 year after surgery. The 30-day and 1-year overall mortality rates were 7.9% and 23.6%, respectively. Both the 30-day and 1-year mortality risks were higher in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty than in patients undergoing SHS (p=0.068 versus 0.058). The 30-day mortality was higher in patients receiving general anesthesia than in those receiving combined spinal and epidural anesthesia (p=0.009). The 1-year mortality risk was higher in patients with ASA grade 4 than in those with grade 1 and 2 (p=0.045). Advanced age (p=0.022) and male sex (p=0.007) were also found to be the risk factors for 1-year mortality.ConclusionWe demonstrated that higher ASA grade, male sex, general anesthesia, and hemiarthroplasty procedures are associated with higher mortality rates in elderly patients with hip fractures. Thus, we highly recommend orthopedic surgeons to consider all these factors in the management of intertrochanteric hip fractures in the geriatric population.Level of EvidenceLevel IV, Prognostic Study     

Mortality after total hip replacement: 0-10-year follow-up of 39,543 patients in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register

We have studied the mortality after total hip replacement (THR) of 39,543 patients, having a mean age of 69 years, who were reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. The median follow-up time was 5.2 (0-10.4) years. 323 of 6201 deaths occurred during the first 60 postoperative days. The patient mortality was compared with the mortality in the Norwegian population, using standardized mortality ratios (SMR). The SMRs were compared and adjusted for age, gender, and other possible confounders in a Cox regression model incorporating the population mortality. We observed a lower mortality in patients with THR than in the Norwegian population (8-year patient mortality was 25%, versus 30% in the corresponding Norwegian population. SMR = 0.81). There was an increased standardized mortality ratio in patients less than 50 years (SMR = 2.50), patients 50-59 years (SMR = 1.16), patients with THR due to rheumatoid arthritis (SMR = 1.48), and patients with femoral neck fracture (SMR = 1.11). The SMR decreased with increasing age at the time of THR surgery. After revision surgery, the SMR was similar to that after the first primary operation, whereas a second primary operation in the opposite hip was associated with a further reduction in the SMR (SMR = 0.65). During the first 60 postoperative days, all patient categories had a higher mortality than the general population (0.8% mortality, SMR = 1.39).     

Mortality after total hip replacement: 0-10-year follow-up of 39,543 patients in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register

We have studied the mortality after total hip replacement (THR) of 39,543 patients, having a mean age of 69 years, who were reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. The median follow-up time was 5.2 (0-10.4) years. 323 of 6201 deaths occurred during the first 60 postoperative days. The patient mortality was compared with the mortality in the Norwegian population, using standardized mortality ratios (SMR). The SMRs were compared and adjusted for age, gender, and other possible confounders in a Cox regression model incorporating the population mortality. We observed a lower mortality in patients with THR than in the Norwegian population (8-year patient mortality was 25%, versus 30% in the corresponding Norwegian population. SMR = 0.81). There was an increased standardized mortality ratio in patients less than 50 years (SMR = 2.50), patients 50-59 years (SMR = 1.16), patients with THR due to rheumatoid arthritis (SMR = 1.48), and patients with femoral neck fracture (SMR = 1.11). The SMR decreased with increasing age at the time of THR surgery. After revision surgery, the SMR was similar to that after the first primary operation, whereas a second primary operation in the opposite hip was associated with a further reduction in the SMR (SMR = 0.65). During the first 60 postoperative days, all patient categories had a higher mortality than the general population (0.8% mortality, SMR = 1.39).     

Prediction of survival, second fracture, and functional recovery following the first hip fracture surgery in elderly patients

This study was designed to investigate predictable factors of mortality, second fracture, and functional recovery within 24 months of hip fracture surgery in elderly patients. In addition, the authors sought to identify differences in survival and functional outcomes according to fracture type. Four hundred and fifteen patients with acute, first-time and lower-energy trauma hip fractures were enrolled into this prospective cohort study and followed for a minimum of 24 months. The potential risk factors of mortality and functional outcomes considered were; (1) age, gender, body mass index, previous fracture history, preoperative ambulatory ability and residency type; (2) 8 comorbidity items, cognitive impairment, smoking, and American Society of Anesthesiologists' classification; and (3) delay prior to surgery, fracture type, operation time, operation method, and postoperative fall history. Multivariate logistic regression and Cox regression models were used for analysis. One-year and 2-year mortality rates after hip fracture surgery were 14.7% and 24.3%, respectively. The 2-year second fracture rate was 9.2% and the 2-year functional recovery rate was 38.6%. Advanced age, cancer, a prior fracture history, and a solitary life were found to be significantly associated with the risk of increased 2-year mortality. A fall within 1 year of surgery and a solitary life were found to be closely associated with the risk of a second fracture, and malignancy and cognitive impairment with a poor functional outcome. Operation time and the 2-year second fracture rate differed significantly between the two fracture groups. An understanding of the incidences and risk factors of mortality and postoperative outcomes following hip fracture surgery in elderly patients provides a valuable basis to improve in health care of geriatric population.     

Mortality after total hip replacement: 0-10-year follow-up of 39,543 patients in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register

We have studied the mortality after total hip replacement (THR) of 39,543 patients, having a mean age of 69 years, who were reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. The median follow-up time was 5.2 (0-10.4) years. 323 of 6201 deaths occurred during the first 60 postoperative days. The patient mortality was compared with the mortality in the Norwegian population, using standardized mortality ratios (SMR). The SMRs were compared and adjusted for age, gender, and other possible confounders in a Cox regression model incorporating the population mortality. We observed a lower mortality in patients with THR than in the Norwegian population (8-year patient mortality was 25%, versus 30% in the corresponding Norwegian population. SMR = 0.81). There was an increased standardized mortality ratio in patients less than 50 years (SMR = 2.50), patients 50-59 years (SMR = 1.16), patients with THR due to rheumatoid arthritis (SMR = 1.48), and patients with femoral neck fracture (SMR = 1.11). The SMR decreased with increasing age at the time of THR surgery. After revision surgery, the SMR was similar to that after the first primary operation, whereas a second primary operation in the opposite hip was associated with a further reduction in the SMR (SMR = 0.65). During the first 60 postoperative days, all patient categories had a higher mortality than the general population (0.8% mortality, SMR = 1.39).