Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study

Background Various sources of error, including central corneal thickness (CCT) and structural corneal rigidity, have been proposed for Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). The Pascal dynamic contour tonometer (DCT) is a novel device designed for intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements assumed to be largely independent of CCT and corneal curvature. We compared DCT with GAT in eyes with normal corneas of various thickness.Methods We prospectively measured IOP using DCT and GAT in random order in 100 eyes of 100 subjects (M:F=46:54; mean age 42±19, range 23–88 years).Results Mean DCT values were about 1mmHg higher than GAT readings (16±3 vs 15±3 mmHg, p=0.001). Bland–Altman analysis of individual pairs of DCT and GAT measurements revealed a bias of –1.0 mmHg [95% confidence interval (CI): ±1.2]. Neither GAT nor DCT showed a significant correlation with CCT (533±48, range 399–641 m).Conclusions In eyes with normal corneas, DCT allows suitable and reliable IOP measurements which are in good concordance with GAT. Comparison of DCT with intracameral manometry is desirable in the future.     

A comparison between Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry after photorefractive keratectomy

Background

The intraocular pressure (IOP) could be measured by both Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT). Although these two methods have been discussed widely after laser-assisted sub-epithelial keratectomy (LASIK), there is little data in the cases undergoing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). We aimed to compare the changes of IOP measurements obtained by GAT and DCT after PRK for myopia/myopic astigmatism.

Methods

This prospective study enrolled 77 candidates (154 eyes) for PRK to correct myopia or myopic astigmatism and 30 matched patients (30 eyes) with myopia or myopic astigmatism who served as controls. Changes of the IOP measurements (ΔIOP) obtained by GAT and DCT before and at 6 months after PRK in the operated eyes, and at baseline and 6 months later in the controls, were documented. Changes of the central corneal thickness (ΔCCT) were determined in the same fashion.

Results

The mean IOP readings obtained by DCT were comparable before and at 6 months after procedure (18.34 ± 3.03 mmHg and 17.87 ± 2.61 mmHg respectively, p?=?0.41); whereas the mean IOP reading obtained by GAT decreased significantly 6 months postoperatively (17.92 ± 3.63 mmHg and 16.25 ± 2.66 mmHg, p?<?0.001). A significant correlation was present between the ΔIOP obtained by GAT and ΔCCT (r?=?0.61, p?<?0.001). Similar correlation was not significant between the DCT-obtained ΔIOP and the ΔCCT (r?=?0.07, p?=?0.44). The mean ΔIOP obtained by GAT was significantly higher in the operated eyes than in the controls (?1.54?±?1.45 vs 0.07?±?0.44 mmHg, p?=?0.02). The mean DCT-obtained ΔIOP was just marginally insignificant between the operated and nonoperated eyes (?0.63?±?0.59 vs 0.02?±?0.38 mmHg respectively; p?=?0.09).

Conclusions

The authors recommend DCT after PRK in the cases with myopia or myopic astigmatism     

The influence of soft contact lenses on the intraocular pressure measurement

Purpose

To evaluate the influence of silicone hydrogel contact lenses on the intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement using Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), non-contact tonometry (NCT), and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry (DCT).

Methods

We included in the study 40 eyes of 40 patients who did not have any ocular or systemic diseases or contraindications to contact lens use. We measured and recorded the IOP values of each patient using NCT without and with contact lenses (groups 1 and 2, respectively), using DCT without and with contact lenses (groups 3 and 4, respectively), and using GAT without contact lenses (group 5).

Results

The mean IOP value of group 1 was 14.55±2.95 mm Hg and 13.92±2.58 mm Hg in group 2. We detected no statistically significant difference between group 1 and group 2 (P=0.053). The mean IOP values for group 3 and group 4 were 16.26±2.33 mm Hg and 15.19±2.40 mm Hg, respectively. We detected a statistically significant difference between groups 3 and 4 (P=0.005). Group 5''s mean IOP value was 12.97±2.65 mm Hg. IOP values measured with DCT were statistically significantly higher compared with IOP values measured with NCT and GAT (P<0.0001 and P<0.0001, respectively). Additionally, IOP values measured with NCT were statistically significantly higher compared with IOP values measured with GAT (P<0.0001).

Conclusion

According to the results of our study, silicone hydrogel soft contact lens use does not significantly affect IOP values measured with NCT, but it affects IOP values measured with DCT.     

Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in normal and glaucomatous eyes

AIM: To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with the rebound tonometry (RT), dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in normal and glaucomatous eyes and investigate the effects of central corneal thickness (CCT) and corneal curvature (CC) on IOP measurements. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-four eyes of 124 subjects were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Fifty-six of participants were healthy individuals and 68 of them were glaucomatous patients. IOP was measured on each subject always in the same order, ICare RT-Pascal DCT-GAT, after a minimum interval of 10min between measurements. CCT and CC were measured using a rotating Scheimpflug camera before the IOP measurements in all subjects. One way repeated measures ANOVA, Pearson correlation coefficient and regression analysis, and Bland-Altman analysis was used for the statistical assessment. RESULTS: Mean IOP for all enrolled eyes was 16.00±3.80 mm Hg for GAT, 16.99±4.91 mm Hg for RT, and 20.40±4.44 mm Hg for DCT. Mean differences between GAT and RT was -1.75±3.41 mm Hg in normal (P<0.001) and -0.37±3.00 mm Hg in glaucomatous eyes (P=0.563). Mean differences between GAT and DCT was -4.06±3.42 mm Hg in normal (P<0.001) and -4.67±3.12 mm Hg in glaucomatous eyes (P<0.001). GAT and RT were significantly positive correlated with CCT in normal (r=0.317, P=0.017 and r=0.576, P<0.001, respectively) and glaucomatous eyes (r=0.290, P=0.016 and r=0.351, P=0.003, respectively). DCT was also significantly positive correlated with CCT in normal eyes (r=0.424, P=0.001) but not in glaucomatous eyes (r=0.170, P=0.165). All tonometers were unaffected by CC. CONCLUSION: IOP measurements by RT and DCT were significantly higher than GAT. DCT has highest IOP measurements among these tonometers. RT was most influenced tonometer from CCT although all tonometers were significantly positive correlated with CCT except DCT in glaucomatous eyes. CC did not influence IOP measurements.     

Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma practice

Purpose: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) readings taken using dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) with IOP readings taken with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in eyes with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Methods: The present study included 100 eyes in 100 patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. After pachymetry DCT and GAT were performed. Intraocular pressures as measured with DCT and GAT were compared with one another and with central corneal thickness (CCT). Results: Mean DCT IOP measurements (20.1 ± 4.3 mmHg) were significantly (p < 0.001) higher than GAT IOP values (17.9 ± 4.7 mmHg). The mean difference between DCT and GAT measurements was 2.1 mmHg (range ? 3.4 to 9.7 mmHg). The difference followed a normal distribution. Measurements made with DCT and GAT correlated significantly with one another (Spearman’s rho = 0.761, p < 0.001). Neither GAT nor DCT measurements showed a significant correlation with CCT (537 ± 39 μm, range 458–656 μm). Multivariate regression analysis has shown that the difference between DCT and GAT is influenced significantly by ocular pulse amplitude (r = ? 0.334, p = 0.001) and it is not influenced by CCT (r = ? 0.106, p = 0.292). Conclusions: In eyes with glaucoma or ocular hypertension, DCT facilitates suitable and reliable IOP measurements which are in good concordance with GAT readings. Variation in CCT cannot by itself explain the differences in measurements taken with DCT and GAT in a number of eyes.     

Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in deep lamellar and penetrating keratoplasties

PURPOSE: To compare the measurements of intraocular pressure (IOP) with dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in eyes with corneal graft and to evaluate the influence of corneal thickness (CCT), corneal curvature (CC), and astigmatism on these methods. DESIGN: Prospective, observational cross-sectional study. METHODS: Eighteen eyes of 18 patients after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) and 14 eyes of 14 patients after deep lamellar keratoplasty (DLKP) underwent IOP evaluation with DCT and GAT, and measurements of CCT, CC, and astigmatism. Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate the agreement between tonometers. Multivariate regression analysis was used to evaluate the influence of ocular structural factors and running suture on IOP measurements obtained with both tonometers. RESULTS: IOP values obtained by DCT and GAT were strongly correlated in all eyes (r = .91; P < .001). DCT values measured 2.5 +/- 1.7 mm Hg higher than GAT readings (P < .001). A reduction of the mean IOP difference between DCT and GAT with an increase in IOP values (P < .001) was found. Regression analysis showed no effect of CCT, CC, astigmatism, and running suture on both DCT and GAT readings, either in DLKP or in PKP eyes. CONCLUSIONS: We found a good overall correlation between both tonometers but the agreement between instruments differs in high or low IOP ranges. The wide and varying 95% limits of agreement between DCT and GAT indicates that DCT provides IOP measurements on deep lamellar and penetrating keratoplasties which can be used in the clinical practice.     

Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness in primary congenital glaucoma

Background

To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with dynamic contour tonometer (DCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), and to investigate their relationship to central corneal thickness (CCT) in primary congenital glaucoma (PCG) eyes.

Methods

Thirty-one eyes of 31 PCG patients (25.7?±?7.2 years old) were examined. PCG was defined as elevated IOP, enlarged corneal diameter (buphthalmos), Haab’s striae and abnormal findings at gonioscopy. The mean of three measurements of GAT, DCT (quality scores 1 and 2), and CCT were obtained and assessed for agreement by means of Bland–Altman plot and for Spearman correlation test.

Results

Mean CCT was 534?±?72.3 μm (range: 430 to 610 μm). Mean IOP measurements were 15.1?±?4.2 mmHg (range: 5.5 to 22.7 mmHg) for DCT and 14.5?±?5.6 mmHg (range: 7.0 to 34.0 mmHg) for GAT (P?=?0.244). Spearman correlation tests showed that IOP difference (DCT ? GAT) was not correlated with CCT (r ²?=?0.023, P?=?0.417). IOP measurements by DCT were weakly but statistically correlated with those obtained with GAT (r²?=?0.213, P?=?0.0089). Bland–Altman analysis revealed poor agreement between DCT and GAT readings, considering the 95 % confidence intervals of ±10.45 mmHg.

Conclusions

The differences between DCT and GAT readings were not influenced by CCT in this series of patients. Considering the weak correlation and the poor agreement observed between GAT and DCT measurements and that they both may be affected by corneal biomechanical changes, these methods should not be used interchangeably, and may possibly give no meaningful IOP values in PCG patients.     

The effect of contact lens-induced corneal edema on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry

Purpose  To evaluate the effect of contact lens-induced corneal edema on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements using Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) in Asian subjects. Participants  The study included 40 eyes of 20 normal volunteers with no evidence of ocular disease. Methods  Forty eyes of 20 healthy volunteers were required to wear soft contact lenses for 2 hours to induce corneal swelling. Central corneal thickness (CCT) and IOP were measured before and immediately after contact lens wear using specular microscope, GAT, and DCT. The IOP measurements by GAT and DCT were compared. The changes in the CCT and the IOP measurements after wearing contact lenses were assessed. Results  The mean CCT of the 40 eyes evaluated was 532.6 ± 31.6 μm. The mean IOP was 11.78 ± 2.04 mmHg for the GAT and 14.46 ± 1.89 mmHg for the DCT, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). After wearing contact lenses, the mean CCT was 553.2 ± 34.3 μm, which was 20.6 ± 12.9 μm greater than before wearing them (P < 0.001). The mean IOP measurements of the GAT and DCT were decreased after wearing the contact lenses. The mean decrease of the GAT values was 0.43 ± 1.95 mmHg, which was not statistically significant (P = 0.175). However, the mean decrease of the DCT readings, which was 0.75 ± 1.74 mm Hg, was statistically significant (P = 0.010). Conclusion  The IOP measurements with DCT were significantly higher than those with GAT in healthy Asian eyes. Although the mean IOP measurements of both the GAT and the DCT were decreased in the edematous cornea, IOP measurements of the DCT were more affected by corneal edema than were the GAT. The authors have no proprietary, commercial, or financial interests in any of the products described in this study.     

A cross-sectional study to compare intraocular pressure measurement by sequential use of Goldman applanation tonometry,dynamic contour tonometry,ocular response analyzer,and Corvis ST

Objective:

To study the correlation and effect of sequential measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) with Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), ocular response analyzer (ORA), dynamic contour tonometer (DCT), and Corvis ST.

Setting and Design:

Observational cross-sectional series from the comprehensive clinic of a tertiary eye care center seen during December 2012.

Methods:

One hundred and twenty-five study eyes of 125 patients with normal IOP and biomechanical properties underwent IOP measurement on GAT, DCT, ORA, and Corvis ST; in four different sequences. Patients with high refractive errors, recent surgeries, glaucoma, and corneal disorders were excluded so as to rule out patients with evident altered corneal biomechanics.

Statistical Analysis:

Linear regression and Bland–Altman using MedCalc software.

Results:

Multivariate analysis of variance with repeated measures showed no influence of sequence of device use on IOP (P = 0.85). Linear regression r² between GAT and Corvis ST, Corvis ST and Goldmann-correlated IOP (IOPg), and DCT and Corvis ST were 0.37 (P = 0.675), 0.63 (P = 0.607), and 0.19 (P = 0.708), respectively. The Bland–Altman agreement of Corvis ST with GAT, corneal compensated IOP, and IOPg was 2 mmHg (−5.0 to + 10.3), −0.5 mmHg (−8.1 to 7.1), and 0.5 mmHg (−6.2 to 7.1), respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficient for repeatability ranged from 0.81 to 0.96.

Conclusions:

Correlation between Corvis ST and ORA was found to be good and not so with GAT. However, agreement between the devices was statistically insignificant, and no influence of sequence was observed.     

Risk factors for a postoperative intraocular pressure spike after phacoemulsification

Background: The aim of our study was to examine several potential risk factors for intraocular pressure (IOP) spikes 2 to 3 hours after phacoemulsification.Methods: 50 eyes of 50 consecutive patients undergoing uncomplicated phacoemulsification under topical anesthesia were included in this prospective study. The following variables were recorded:preoperative IOP, nuclear colour,cortical lens opacity,posterior subcapsular lens opacity,patient age;and presence or absence of preexisting glaucoma.Results: The mean IOP at each time interval was as follows: preoperatively, 14.5 (SD 3.4) mm Hg; 2-3 hours postoperatively, 23.1 (7.0) mm Hg; and 24 hours postoperatively, 17.0 (6.0) mm Hg. The postoperative IOP was significantly higher than baseline at 2-3 hours (p < 0.001) and at 24 hours (p = 0.002). Overall there were 10 cases (20%) of IOP spikes 2-3 hours postoperatively. Higher mean baseline IOP was significantly associated with postoperative IOP spikes (p = 0.013). Patient age, sex, operating surgeon, absolute phacoemulsification time, lens nuclear colour, cortical opacity, and posterior opacity were not significantly different between groups with or without an IOP spike (p > 0.05).Interpretation: Patients with high IOP at the preoperative assessment are more likely to have IOP spikes after surgery and should be scheduled at the start of the operating list. In a day-case setting with restricted opening hours, postoperative checks in those patients at risk of IOP spikes can then coincide with the time IOP reaches its peak.     

Transconjunctival suturing of the scleral flap for overfiltration with hypotony maculopathy after trabeculectomy

Objective: To assess the efficacy of transconjunctival suturing of the scleral flap in improving hypotony maculopathy resulting from overfiltration after trabeculectomy.Design: Retrospective review.Participants: 35 eyes of 33 patients.Methods: Patients underwent transconjunctival scleral flap suturing for hypotony maculopathy following trabeculectomy using mitomycin C. The scleral flap was sutured through the conjunctiva as an outpatient clinic procedure using a spatulated needle with a 10-0 nylon suture.Results: The average age of the patients was 67.5 (SD 4.80, range 39-83) years, and 52% patients were male. The average duration of hypotony prior to transconjunctival suturing of the flap was 108.0 (SD 68.3) days. The median intraocular pressure (IOP) before suturing was 3 mm Hg, and the median IOP 6 months after the procedure was 9 mm Hg (p < 0.0001). The median best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) before transconjunctival suturing of the scleral flap was 20/100, and the median BCVA 6 months after the procedure was 20/30 (p < 0.0001). Compared with visual acuity before suturing the average gain in BCVA was 4.9 (SD 0.8) lines.Conclusions: Transconjunctival suturing of the trabeculectomy scleral flap is an effective treatment to raise IOP and improve visual loss from hypotony maculopathy after trabeculectomy with overfiltering blebs.     

Intravitreal bevacizumab and aqueous shunting surgery for neovascular glaucoma: safety and efficacy

Objective: To study the safety and efficacy of intravitreal injection of bevacizumab followed by aqueous shunting tube surgery for the management of neovascular glaucoma (NVG).Study Design: A prospective, non-randomized study with a historical control group.Participants: Twenty eyes of 20 patients with intractable NVG were treated with intravitreal injection of bevacizumab followed by aqueous shunting surgery (IVB group). A historical group of 10 NVG eyes treated with panretinal photocoagulation followed by aqueous shunting surgery without bevacizumab injection was used for comparison (PRP group).Methods: Injection of bevacizumab (1.25 mg/0.05 mL) was performed under topical anesthesia. An Ahmed valve was implanted in all cases after 1-2 weeks. In the IVB group, 10 eyes received postoperative panretinal photocoagulation (subgroup IA), and 10 eyes were followed without further photocoagulation (subgroup IB). Minimum follow-up was I year or when failure was diagnosed.Results: Mean preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) was 46.5 mm Hg in the IVB group and 49.2 mm Hg in the PRP group (p = 0.5). After bevacizumab injection, iris neovessels regressed markedly. The final IOP after aqueous shunting tube surgery was 18.8 mm Hg in the IVB group and 15.9 mm Hg in the PRP group (p = 0.2). Postsurgical complications were comparable between the groups. The success rate was 85% and 70% in the 2 groups, respectively. Two eyes were considered failures, and 3 required repeated bevacizumab injections in subgroup IB as compared with I in subgroup IA.Conclusion: Intravitreal bevacizumab is a useful preparatory step to safely and effectively implant an aqueous shunting tube in NVG. Panretinal photocoagulation after bevacizumab injection promotes the success rate of aqueous shunt surgery by permanent ablation of the ischemic retina.     

Can preoperative anterior chamber angle width predict magnitude of intraocular pressure change after cataract surgery?

Objective: To determine whether preoperative anterior chamberangle width,capturedbyanteriorsegment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), can be a predictor of intraocular pressure (IOP) change following cataract surgery.Design: Prospective comparative observational study.Participants: Fifty-three eyes of 53 patients awaiting cataract surgery were included.Methods: Measurement of anterior chamber angle width and IOP using AS-OCT and Goldmann’s applanation tonometry, respectively, were performed before and 6 months after phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. Preoperative and postoperative measurements were compared using paired t test. The prediction rule defined success as ≥20% IOP reduction from the baseline preoperative IOP measurement. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to assess the association of postoperative IOP with independent variables, including age, sex, systemic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, glaucoma, and preoperative anterior chamber angle width.Results: Data were collected from 32 females and 21 males with visually significant cataract. Mean age was 73.3 (SD 8.2) years. Mean IOP dropped from 15.1 (SD 3.l)mm Hg to 12.8 (SD 2.5) mm Hg (p < 0.0001) after cataract extraction. Mean anterior chamber angle width increased from 24.7° (SD 7.1°) to 38.1° (SD 6.0°) after surgery (p < 0.001). Multivariate regression analysis did not identify preoperative variables to be significantly associated with ≥20% postoperative IOP reduction.Conclusions: Cataract surgery results in significant and sustained mean reductions in IOP and concurrent increases in anterior chamber angle width for a period of at least 6 months after surgery. However, measurements of the preoperative anterior chamber angle width did not predict the IOP-lowering effect of cataract surgery.     

Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) versus Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) - a comparison of agreement and reproducibility

Background

The PASCAL® dynamic contour tonometer (DCT) is a novel device designed for intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements. It is assumed to be largely independent of corneal properties. In a previous study we compared DCT with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in 100 right eyes with normal corneas. The aim of the present study is to evaluate whether differences DCT-GAT?≥?2.0 mmHg found in the previous study are reproducible and also present in the fellow eye.

Methods

Twenty-three of the 100 patients (M:F?=?8:15, mean age: 36?±?11 SD, range 22–53 years) with a previous difference DCT-GAT?≥?2.0 mmHg were included in the present study. The minimum interval between the initial and the current examination was 3 weeks. The IOP-values of the fellow eyes in this subgroup were assessed in parallel.

Results

The difference DCT-GAT was 2.44?±?0.4 SEM mmHg in the subgroup of the 23 right eyes and 2.03?±?0.5 SEM mmHg for the fellow eyes, compared to 0.94?±?0.5 SEM mmHg in the initial sample of 100 eyes.

Conclusions

In cases with higher difference between DCT-GAT, the difference is reproducible and even present in the fellow eye. We, therefore, assume that the differences are not caused by chance, but by differing biomechanical corneal properties.     

Assessment of intraocular pressure measured by Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer, Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, and Dynamic Contour Tonometry in healthy individuals

AIM: To investigate the accuracy of intraocular pressure (IOP) as measured by a Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA), as well as the relationship between central corneal thickness (CCT) and IOP as measured by ORA, Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT). METHODS: A total of 158 healthy individuals (296 eyes) were chosen randomly for measurement of IOP. After CCT was measured using A-ultrasound (A-US), IOP was measured by ORA, GAT, and DCT devices in a randomized order. The IOP values acquired using each of the three tonometries were compared, and the relationship between CCT and IOP values were analyzed separately. Two IOP values, Goldmann-correlated IOP value (IOPg) and corneal-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc), were got using ORA. Three groups were defined according to CCT: 1) thin cornea (CCT<520μm); 2) normal-thickness cornea (CCT: 520–580μm); and 3) thick cornea (CCT>580μm) groups. RESULTS: In normal subjects, IOP measurements were 14.95±2.99mmHg with ORA (IOPg), 15.21±2.77mmHg with ORA (IOPcc), 15.22±2.77mmHg with GAT, and 15.49±2.56mmHg with DCT. Mean differences were 0.01±2.29mmHg between IOPcc and GAT (P>0.05) and 0.28±2.20mmHg between IOPcc and DCT (P>0.05). There was a greater correlation between IOPcc and DCT (r=0.946, P=0.000) than that between IOPcc and GAT (r=0.845, P=0.000). DCT had a significant correlation with GAT (r=0.854, P=0.000). GAT was moderately correlated with CCT (r=0.296, P<0.001), while IOPcc showed a weak but significant correlation with CCT (r=?0.155, P=0.007). There was a strong negative correlation between CCT and the difference between IOPcc and GAT(r=-0.803,P=0.000), with every 10μm increase in CCT resulting in an increase in this difference of 0.35mmHg. The thick cornea group (CCT>580μm) showed the least significant correlation between IOPcc and GAT (r=0.859, P=0.000); while the thin cornea group (CCT＜520μm) had the most significant correlation between IOPcc and GAT (r=0.926, P=0.000). The correlated differences between IOPcc and DCT were not significant in any of the three groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Measurement of IOP by ORA has high repeatability and is largely consistent with GAT measurements. Moreover, the ORA measurements are affected only to a small extent by CCT, and are likely to be much closer to the real IOP value than GAT.     

Medical control of intraocular pressure with brinzolamide 1% after phacoemulsification

Background: To compare the effectiveness of only 1 drop of topical brinzolamide 1% with dosing every 12 hours and with no ocular hypotensive medication following clear corneal phacoemulsification surgery.Methods: This prospective, randomized, double-blind study was composed of 60 eyes of 60 patients who underwent uneventful clear corneal phacoemulsification surgery under topical anesthesia. There were no intraoperative complications. Eyes were randomized to receive only 1 drop of topical brinzolamide 1% immediately after surgery, 1 drop of brinzolamide 1% every 12 (q12h) hours starting immediately after speculum removal, or no ocular hypotensive medication (control group). Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured preoperatively and at 4 to 6 hours and 18 to 24 hours postoperatively by a Perkins tonometer.Results: Preoperative IOP was not significantly different among the 3 groups. IOPs of both the brinzolamide 1 drop group (p = 0.000) and the brinzolamide q12h group (p = 0.001) were significantly lower than those of the control group at 4 to 6 hours postoperatively. The same result was observed at 18 to 24 hours postoperatively in the brinzolamide q12h group (p = 0.001) but not the brinzolamide 1 drop group (p = 0.489). The brinzolamide q12h group had significantly lower IOP compared with the brinzolamide 1 drop group (p = 0.000) at 18 to 24 hours postoperatively. None of the eyes in the medication groups, but 1 eye (5%) in the control group, had postoperative IOP elevation ≥30 mm Hg at 4 to 6 hours; such an elevation was not encountered at postoperative 18 to 24 hours. Preoperative to postoperative IOP increase of >5 mm Hg at 4 to 6 hours postoperatively was seen in 4 (20%), 4 (20%), and 14 (70%) eyes in the brinzolamide 1 drop group, the brinzolamide q12h group, and the control group, respectively.Interpretation: The current study reveals that 1 drop of brinzolamide 1% is sufficient to control IOP within the first 4 to 6 hours following uneventful phacoemulsification, whereas 12-hour dosing is necessary for prolonged control of IOP.     

A trial of topical prednisolone acetate before intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide decreases intraocular pressure spikes

Objective: To compare adverse intraocular pressure (IOP) spikes in patients receiving intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) in 2 cohorts: (i) patients who underwent a topical prednisolone acetate trial (PAT) without incurring a short-term IOP rise, and (ii) control patients who did not undergo a PAT.Design: Retrospective cohort study.Participants: Charts of all patients who underwent any intravitreal injection during the study period were reviewed (n = 1150).Methods: Patients in the PAT group received a 6-week course of prednisolone acetate 1% 4 times per day and had an IOP that did not rise above 25 mm Hg or above 8 mm Hg over the IOP in the contralateral eye. Patients undergoing a PAT and having a short-term IOP rise were not studied. Control patients did not receive a PAT. All patients received 12-20 mg of IVTA. Patients were followed for a minimum of 6 weeks and follow-up lasted for I year or until intraocular surgery or another IVTA injection was performed.Results: There were 97 patients in the PAT cohort and 75 control patients. Patients in the PAT cohort had a lower proportional rise between maximum IOP and baseline (43%) compared with controls (64%) (p = 0.035). Patients in the PAT group also had a lower risk of incurring a 40% (p = 0.05), 60% (p = 0.0I8), and 100% (p = 0.045) increase in maximum IOP (vs baseline) compared with controls and were less likely to require glaucoma filtration surgery (p = 0.035).Conclusions: Patients undergoing a PAT who did not have a subsequent short-term IOP rise had a lower risk of severe IOP spikes after IVTA compared with those patients receiving IVTA but not having undergone a PAT.     

Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry

PURPOSE: The dynamic contour tonometer (DCT; Pascal tonometer) is a novel tonometer designed to measure intraocular pressure (IOP) independent of corneal properties. The purpose of this study was a comparison of the DCT with the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) with respect to mean of IOP readings, the influence of ocular structural factors on IOP readings, and both intra- and interobserver variability, in a large group of healthy subjects. METHODS: In a prospective study of 228 eyes, IOP measurements by GAT and DCT were compared, and the effects of central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal curvature, axial length, and anterior chamber depth were analyzed. To evaluate intra- and interobserver variability, IOP was measured in eight eyes by four observers. RESULTS: There was a high concordance between the IOP readings obtained by DCT and GAT. However, IOP readings were consistently higher with DCT than with GAT (median difference: +1.7 mm Hg, interquartile range [25th-75th percentile] = 0.8-2.7 mm Hg). In contrast to GAT, multivariable regression analysis showed no significant effect of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, astigmatism, anterior chamber depth, and axial length on DCT readings. For repeated measurements the intraobserver variability was 0.65 mm Hg for the DCT and 1.1 mm Hg for the GAT (P = 0.008). Interobserver variability was 0.44 mm Hg for the DCT and 1.28 mm Hg for the GAT (P = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: IOP measurements by DCT are highly concordant with IOP readings obtained from GAT but do not vary in CCT and have a lower intra- and interobserver variability. DCT seems to be an appropriate method of tonometry for routine clinical use.     

Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude using dynamic contour tonometry and contact lens tonometry

Background

The new Ocular Dynamic Contour Tonometer (DCT), investigational device supplied by SMT (Swiss Microtechnology AG, Switzerland) allows simultaneous recording of intraocular pressure (IOP) and ocular pulse amplitude (OPA). It was the aim of this study to compare the IOP results of this new device with Goldmann tonometry. Furthermore, IOP and OPA measured with the new slitlamp-mounted DCT were compared to the IOP and OPA measured with the hand-held SmartLens^®, a gonioscopic contact lens tonometer (ODC Ophthalmic Development Company AG, Switzerland).

Methods

Nineteen healthy subjects were included in this study. IOP was determined by three consecutive measurements with each of the DCT, SmartLens^®, and Goldmann tonometer. Furthermore, OPA was measured three times consecutively by DCT and SmartLens^®.

Results

No difference (P = 0.09) was found between the IOP values by means of DCT (mean: 16.6 mm Hg, median: 15.33 mm Hg, SD: +/- 4.04 mm Hg) and Goldmann tonometry (mean: 16.17 mm Hg, median: 15.33 mm Hg, SD: +/- 4.03 mm Hg). The IOP values of SmartLens^® (mean: 20.25 mm Hg, median: 19.00 mm Hg, SD: +/- 4.96 mm Hg) were significantly higher (P = 0.0008) both from Goldmann tonometry and DCT. The OPA values of the DCT (mean: 3.08 mm Hg, SD: +/- 0.92 mm Hg) were significantly lower (P = 0.0003) than those obtained by SmartLens^® (mean: 3.92 mm Hg, SD: +/- 0.83 mm Hg).

Conclusions

DCT was equivalent to Goldmann applanation tonometry in measurement of IOP in a small group of normal subjects. In contrast, SmartLens^® (contact lens tonometry) gave IOP readings that were significantly higher compared with Goldmann applanation tonometer readings. Both devices, DCT and SmartLens^® provide the measurement of OPA which could be helpful e.g. for the management of glaucoma.

     

Efficacy and safety of a steel drainage device implanted under a scleral flap

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a stainless steel miniature glaucoma drainage device (Ex-PRESS X200) implanted under a scleral flap for the surgical treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).Study Design: Clinical, prospective, noncomparative, nonrandomized study. The efficacy and safety were evaluated on the full sample, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months (maximum 24, mean 18).Participants: Thirty-seven eyes of 35 patients.Methods: The Ex-PRESS device was implanted under a scleral flap in patients with POAG.Results: Preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) was 27.6 (SD 8.7) mm Hg; at last follow-up, IOP was 12.4 (SD 3.4) mm Hg (55.1% reduction). The success rates (IOP < 18 mm Hg and < 15 mm Hg at last visit without medications) were 78.4% (29/37) and 70.3% (26/37), respectively. Kaplan-Meier analyses (probability of IOP < 18 mm Hg and < 15 mm Hg without medications) at last follow-up were 72.6% and 47.9%, respectively. Early postoperative complications were clinically mild and included postoperative IOP < 5 mm Hg: 12 cases at 1 day, 8 cases at 1 week, 3 cases at 1 month, 1 case at 3 months; serous choroidal detachment: 9 cases, of which 3 spontaneously resolved, whereas in 6 cases, hypotony and flat chamber were treated with viscoelastic injection in the anterior chamber. At last follow-up, 6 patients were treated with 2 IOP-lowering medications. No sight-threatening consequences of surgery were observed. There were 8 cases (21.6%, n = 37) of bleb needling.Conclusions: Our data support the efficacy and safety of the implantation of this device under a scleral flap. The IOP reduction obtained was significant and long standing and complications were mild.