Repeat hepatic resection as effective treatment for recurrent colorectal liver metastases

Background: Approximately 20–40% of patients who undergo liver resection for colorectal metastases develop recurrent disease confined to the liver. The goals of this study were to determine whether the survival benefit of repeat hepatic resection justified the potential morbidity and mortality. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on all patients who underwent liver resection for colorectal cancer metastases between 1983 and 1995 (N=202). Repeat liver resections were performed on 23 patients for recurrent metastases. Results: There were no operative deaths in the 23 patients, and the postoperative morbidity rate was 22%. The 5-year actuarial survival rate after repeat resection was 32%, with a median length of survival of 39.9 months. There were three patients who survived for >5 years after repeat resection. Sixteen patients (70%) developed recurrent disease at a median interval of 11 months after the second resection; 10 of these 16 patients (62%) had new hepatic metastases. No clinical or pathological factors were significant in predicting long-term survival. Conclusions: Repeat liver resection for recurrent colorectal metastases (a) can be performed safely with acceptable mortality and morbidity rates and (b) may result in long-term survival in some patients.Presented at the 49th Annual Cancer Symposium of The Society of Surgical Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia, March 21–24, 1996.     

Repeat liver resection for recurrent colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to delineate the role of surgery for recurrent colorectal cancer in the liver and to identify prognosticators for better patient selection and outcome. METHODS: Data from 90 repeat hepatectomies (second = 75; third = 12; fourth = 3) for recurrent colorectal cancer were collected. RESULTS: After the second hepatectomy, the 3-and 5-year survival rates were 48% and 31%, respectively. Twenty-seven percent (20 of 75) of patients are alive without recurrence after a median follow-up of 27 months, and 9 survived more than 5 years. Four or more tumors, positive regional lymph node metastases, concomitant extrahepatic disease, and residual tumor were independent poor prognostic factors after the second hepatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Repeat hepatectomy should be applied for recurrent colorectal cancer, when curative removal of the tumor is possible, although the benefit from treatment was limited in a patient with regional lymph node metastases, 4 or more metastases, or extrahepatic disease.     

结肠癌肝转移术后复发的再次肝切除4例分析

目的探讨再次肝切除在结肠癌肝转移肝切除术后肝内复发（RCLM）中的应用和价值。方法回顾性分析1997年10月至2006年8月中国医学科学院肿瘤医院收治的4例RCLM再次肝切除治疗的临床资料。结果4例RCLM首次和再次肝切除时均无手术死亡和手术并发症发生,术后中位生存期从第1次肝切除时算起为57个月,从再次肝切除算起为25.5个月。结论对RCLM再次肝切除安全可行,对经过选择的病例可明显延长存活期。     

Parenchyma-preserving hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases

Background  

Hepatic resection of colorectal liver metastases is the only curative treatment option. As clinical and experimental data indicate that the extent of liver resection correlates with growth of residual metastases, the present study analyzes the potential benefit of a parenchyma-preserving liver surgery approach.     

Major hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases

A 6 1/2 year experience in the management of hepatic colorectal metastases in a specialist unit is reviewed. During the period studied, 48 patients were referred of whom only 24 actually came to resection. There were two in-hospital deaths, at 20 and 60 days, and six patients had non-fatal complications. Although the extent of resection was greater than in most reported series (13 right hepatectomies and 6 extended right hepatectomies), the results of resection were broadly the same as those of others, with a median survival of 30 months and 2 and 3 year survivals of 50 and 44 per cent respectively. A number of factors which others have considered to be of prognostic significance were examined. Tumour clearance was the only important prognostic indicator, where a 5 mm clear margin between the tumour and cut surface produced a significant difference in survival. It is suggested that a much larger number of patients in the UK with hepatic colorectal metastases might be considered for resection.     

Repeat hepatic resection for recurrent colorectal liver metastases is associated with favourable long-term survival

BACKGROUND: The management of patients with recurrent colorectal liver metastases (RCLM) remains controversial. This study aimed to determine whether repeat liver resection for RCLM could be performed with acceptable morbidity, mortality and long-term survival. METHODS: Of 1121 consecutive liver resections performed and prospectively analysed between 1987 and 2005, 852 'curative' resections were performed on patients with colorectal liver metastases. Single liver resection was performed in 718 patients, and 71 repeat hepatic resections for RCLM were performed in 66 patients. RESULTS: There were no postoperative deaths following repeat hepatic resection compared with a postoperative mortality rate of 1.4 per cent after single hepatic resection. Postoperative morbidity was comparable following single and repeat hepatectomy (26.1 versus 18 per cent; P = 0.172), although median blood loss was greater during repeat resection (450 versus 350 ml; P = 0.006). Actuarial 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 94, 68 and 44 per cent after repeat hepatic resection for RCLM, compared with 89.3, 51.7 and 29.5 per cent respectively following single hepatectomy. CONCLUSION: The beneficial outcomes observed after repeat liver resection in selected patients with RCLM confirm the experience of others and support its status as the preferred choice of treatment for such patients.     

Repeat hepatic resections for colorectal metastases

We identified 106 patients who had undergone complete resection of isolated colorectal hepatic metastases. Nine of these patients subsequently underwent repeat liver resections for isolated hepatic recurrences. The median follow-up for these patients was 21 months. One postoperative death was related to the second hepatectomy. At the time of last follow-up, five patients were alive and free of recurrent disease at 9, 19, 31, 50, and 67 months after their second hepatic resection. The remaining three patients were alive, but disease had recurred 11 months after resection in the first patient, 12 months after resection in the second, and 18 months after resection in the third. Among these three patients, two had solitary pulmonary nodules, which were resected, and one had unresectable liver disease. Our experience and a review of the literature suggest that repeat hepatic resection for isolated colorectal metastases can result in long-term survival in selected patients.     

Repeat hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases

This study includes 16 patients (9 men, 7 women; mean age 64 years) who underwent a total of 19 repeat hepatectomies for metastasis after colon (n=7) or rectal (n=9) carcinoma. All patients were reoperated for recurrent liver metastasis after the first resection (mean, 21 months; range, 7-40 months), and three had a third hepatectomy 13, 24, or 65 months after the second. Perioperative mortality was 0% and morbidity was 37%. The 3- and 5-year survival rates after the second resection were 56.8% and 28.4%, respectively, with a median survival of 42.3 months. Seven patients died (mean survival, 25.7 months; range, 9-58 months) before the end of the study. Six patients were alive with one or more recurrences, and three (24, 51, and 173 months of follow-up) were alive without known recurrence. Survival rates for repeat resections of colorectal liver metastases in selected patients were comparable with those obtained after resection of a first liver metastasis.     

Comparison between hepatic wedge resection and anatomic resection for colorectal liver metastases

Some investigators have suggested that wedge resection (WR) confers a higher incidence of positive margins and an inferior survival compared with anatomic resection (AR) of colorectal liver metastases (CLM). We sought to investigate the margin status, pattern of recurrence, and overall survival of patients with CLM treated with WR or AR. We identified 253 consecutive patients, in a multi-institutional database from 1991 to 2004, who underwent either WR or AR. WR was defined as a nonanatomic resection of the CLM, and AR was defined as single or multiple resections of one or two contiguous Couinaud segments. Clinicopathologic factors were analyzed with regard to pattern of recurrence and survival. One hundred six WRs were performed in 72 patients and 194 ARs in 181 patients. There was no difference in the rate of positive surgical margin (8.3%), overall recurrence rates, or patterns of recurrence between patients treated with WR vs. AR. Patients who had a positive surgical resection margin were more likely to recur at the surgical margin regardless of whether they underwent WR or AR. The median survival was 76.6 months for WR and 80.8 months for AR, with 5-year actuarial survival rates of 61% and 60%, respectively. AR is not superior to WR in terms of tumor clearance, pattern of recurrence, or survival. WR should remain an integral component of the surgical treatment of CLM. Presented at the 2005 American Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Congress, Hollywood, Florida, April 14–17, 2005.     

Perioperative chemotherapy and hepatic resection for resectable colorectal liver metastases

The role of perioperative chemotherapy in the management of initially resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is still unclear. The EPOC trial [the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 40983] is an important study that declares perioperative chemotherapy as the standard of care for patients with resectable CRLM, and the strategy is widely accepted in western countries. Compared with surgery alone, perioperative FOLFOX therapy significantly increased progression-free survival (PFS) in eligible patients or those with resected CRLM. Overall survival (OS) data from the EPOC trial were recently published in The Lancet Oncology, 2013. Here, we discussed the findings and recommendations from the EORTC 40983 trial.     

Aggressive repeat liver resection for hepatic metastases of colorectal carcinoma

Although hepatectomy for liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma is an effective treatment, recurrence in the liver is still the most common site after hepatectomy. Thirty patients underwent hepatectomy for hepatic metastases and 17 of them had recurrence in the remnant liver during the following 12-year period. Six of the 17 patients underwent a removal of isolated hepatic recurrences. Two of the six patients underwent a third hepatectomy, and three patients underwent partial lung resection on a total of five occasions. There were no operative deaths while complications after a third hepatectomy contributed to a high morbidity rate of 40 per cent. The mean length of survival of the six patients was 28.5 months from the second hepatectomy. The prognosis of the six patients who underwent a repeat hepatectomy was significantly better than that of patients with unresectable recurrence after an initial hepatectomy (p<0.01). The overall 5-year survival of 29 patients excluding one inhospital death was 44.7 per cent. Our results reveal that aggressive removal of isolated and resectable recurrent disease has the potential to improve the prognosis of selected patients with metastatic cancer.     

Repeat hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases.

OBJECTIVE: The authors assess the long-term results of repeat hepatectomies for recurrent metastases of colorectal cancer and determine the factors that can predict survival. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Safer techniques of hepatic resection have allowed surgeons to consider repeat hepatectomy for colorectal metastases in an increasing number of patients. However, higher operative bleeding and increased morbidity have been reported after repeat hepatectomies, and the long-term benefit of these procedures needs to be evaluated. STUDY POPULATION: Sixty-four patients from a group of 243 patients resected for colorectal liver metastases were submitted to 83 repeat hepatectomies (64 second, 15 third, and 4 fourth hepatectomies). Combined extrahepatic surgery was performed in 21 (25%) of these 83 repeat hepatectomies. RESULTS: There was no intraoperative or postoperative mortality. Operative bleeding was not significantly increased in repeat hepatectomies as compared to first resections. Morbidity and duration of hospital stay were comparable to first hepatectomies. Overall and disease-free survival after a second hepatectomy were 60% and 42%, respectively, at 3 years and 41% and 26%, respectively, at 5 years. Factors of prognostic value on univariate analysis included the curative nature of first and second hepatectomies (p = 0.04 and p = 0.002, respectively), an interval between the two procedures of more than 1 year (p = 0.003), the number of recurrent tumors (p = 0.002), serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels (p = 0.03), and the presence of extrahepatic disease (p = 0.03). Only the curative nature of the second hepatectomy and an interval of more than 1 year between the two procedures were independently related to survival on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Repeat hepatectomies can provide long-term survival rates similar to those of first hepatectomies, with no mortality and comparable morbidity. Combined extrahepatic surgery can be required to achieve tumor eradication. Repeat hepatectomies appear worthwhile when potentially curative.     

Trends in long-term survival following liver resection for hepatic colorectal metastases

OBJECTIVE: To examine trends in outcomes of patients undergoing resection at a single tertiary care referral center over a 16-year period. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Hepatic resection is considered the treatment of choice in selected patients with colorectal metastasis confined to the liver. Although a variety of retrospective studies have demonstrated improvements in short-term outcomes in recent years, changes in long-term survival over time are less well-established. METHODS: Data from 226 consecutive patients undergoing potentially curative liver resection for colorectal metastases between 1984 and 1999 were analyzed. Actuarial survival rates related to prognostic determinants were analyzed using the log-rank test. RESULTS: The median survival for the entire cohort was 46 months, with 5- and 10-year survival rates of 40% and 26% respectively. Ninety-three patients operated on between 1984 and 1992 were found to have an overall survival of 31% at 5 years, compared to 58% for the 133 patients operated on during the more recent period (1993-1999). Both overall and disease-free survival were significantly better in the recent time period compared with the earlier period on both univariate and multivariate analyses. Other independent factors associated with improved survival included number of metastatic tumors < or = 3, negative resection margin, and CEA < 100. Comparisons were made between time periods for a variety of patient, tumor and treatment-related factors. Among all parameters studied, only resection type (anatomical versus nonanatomical), use of intraoperative ultrasonography, and perioperative chemotherapy administration differed between the early and recent time periods. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term survival following liver resection for colorectal metastases has improved significantly in recent years at our institution. Although the reasons for this survival trend are not clear, contributing factors may include the use of newer preoperative and intraoperative imaging, increased use of chemotherapy, and salvage surgical therapy.     

Prognostic factors for long-term outcome of hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases

The aim of the study was to analyse the prognostic factors for long-term outcome of liver resections for metastases from colorectal cancer. The retrospective analysis included 297 liver resections for colorectal carcinoma liver metastases. The following prognostic factors were considered: age, gender, stage and grade of differentiation of the primary tumour, node metastases, site of the primary colorectal cancer, number and diameter of the hepatic lesions, time interval from primary cancer to liver metastases, preoperative CEA level, adjuvant chemotherapy after hepatic resection, type of hepatic resection, use of intraoperative ultrasound and portal triad clamping, blood loss and transfusions, postoperative complications and hospital stay, tumour-free surgical margins, clinical risk score (as defined by the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre group, MSKCC-CRS). Overall survival rates were estimated according to the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared at univariate analysis using the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed including significant variables at univariate analysis using the Cox regression model. Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05. The 1, 3, 5 and 10-year overall survival rates were 90.6%, 51%, 27.5%, and 16.9%, respectively. The univariate analysis revealed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) in overall survival in relation to: grade of differentiation of the primary cancer (5-year survival of grades G1-G2 vs grades G3-G4: 30.7% vs 14.4%, p = 0.0016), preoperative CEA level > 5 and > 200 ng/ml (5-year survival of CEA < 5 ng/ml vs CEA > 5 ng/ml: 51.1% vs 15.5%, p = 0.0016; 5-year survival of CEA < 200 ng/ml vs CEA > 200 ng/ml: 27.9% vs 17.4%, p = 0.0001), diameter of major lesions > 5 cm (5-year survival of diameter < or = 5 cm vs > 5 cm: 30.0% vs 18.8%, p = 0.0074), disease-free interval between primary tumour and liver metastases longer than 12 months (5-year survival of patients with disease-free interval < or = 12 months vs > 12 months: 23.0% vs 36.1%, p = 0.042), high MSKCC-CRS (5-year survival of MKSCC-CRS 0-1-2 vs 3-4-5: 36.4% vs 1 6.3%, p = 0.017). The multivariate analysis showed three independent negative prognostic factors: G3-G4 primary cancer, CEA level > 5 ng/ml, and high MSKCC-CRS class. No single prognostic factor turned out to be associated with such disappointing outcomes after hepatic surgery for colorectal liver metastases as to permit the identification of specific subgroups of patients to be excluded on principle from undergoing liver resection. However, in the presence of a number of specific prognostic factors (G3-G4 grade of differentiation of the primary tumour, preoperative CEA level > 5 ng/ml, high MSKCC-CRS) enrolment of the patient in trials exploring new diagnostic tools or new adjuvant treatments may be suggested to improve the preoperative staging of the disease and reduce the incidence of tumour recurrence after liver resection.     

Preoperative prognostic score for predicting survival after hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND: Despite indications for resection of colorectal liver metastases having expanded, debate continues about identifying patients that may benefit from surgery. METHODS: Clinicopathologic data from a total of 700 patients was gathered between January 1993 and January 2006 from a prospectively maintained dataset. Of these, 687 patients underwent resection for colorectal liver metastases. RESULTS: The median age of patient was 64 years and 36.8% of patients had synchronous disease. The overall 5-year survival was 45%. The presence of an inflammatory response to tumor (IRT), defined by an elevated C-reactive protein (>10 mg/L) or a neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio of >5:1, was noted in 24.5% of cases. Only the number of metastases and the presence or absence of an IRT influenced both overall and disease-free survival on multivariable analysis. A preoperative prognostic score was derived: 0 = less than 8 metastases and absence of IRT; 1 = 8 or more metastases or IRT, and 2 = 8 or more metastases and IRT-from the results of the multivariable analysis. The 5-year survival of those scoring 0 was 49% compared with 34% for those scoring 1. None of the patients that scored 2 were alive at 5 years. CONCLUSION: The preoperative prognostic score is a simple and effective system allowing preoperative stratification.     

Repeat hepatectomy for colorectal metastases

The utility of repeat hepatectomy for patients with colorectal metastases to the liver was sought. A complete review of the results of surgical treatment of patients having a repeat hepatectomy was presented. Then, the data on 170 patients in whom multiple clinical variables had been tabulated were selected for special study. These statistical analyses showed that there were no special clinical features present at the time of primary resection of the large bowel cancer that could distinguish these patients. There were some differences in the clinical features of these patients at the time of first and second liver resections. The disease-free interval, method of diagnosis, presence of extrahepatic disease, incidence of complete resection, and postoperative morbidity showed significant differences. The 5-year survival of the group as a whole was 32%. Only those clinical features which involved the completeness of cancer resection had a significant impact on survival. To optimize selection for a long-term survival, no extrahepatic disease should be present and the second hepatectomy should involve removal of all visible tumor. Repeat hepatectomy for colorectal metastases was thought to be justified if the patient was made clinically disease-free, because surgery remains the only potentially curative treatment. The repeat hepatectomy was relatively safe with a low morbidity and conferred a 32% long-term survival. Received for publication on Aug. 30, 1998; accepted on Nov. 2, 1998