Coronary calcium score and computed tomography coronary angiography in high-risk asymptomatic subjects: assessment of diagnostic accuracy and prevalence of non-obstructive coronary artery disease

Objectives

The aim of the study was to compare the coronary artery calcium score (CACS) and computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) for the assessment of non-obstructive/obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in high-risk asymptomatic subjects.

Methods

Two hundred and thirteen consecutive asymptomatic subjects (113 male; mean age 53.6?±?12.4 years) with more than one risk factor and an inconclusive or unfeasible non-invasive stress test result underwent CACS and CTCA in an outpatient setting. All patients underwent conventional coronary angiography (CAG). Data from CACS (threshold for positive image: Agatston score 1/100/1,000) and CTCA were compared with CAG regarding the degree of CAD (non-obstructive/obstructive; </≥50% lumen reduction).

Results

The mean calcium score was 151?±?403 and the prevalence of obstructive CAD was 17% (8% one-vessel and 10% two-vessel disease). Per-patient sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of CACS were: 97%, 75%, 45%, and 100%, respectively (Agatston?≥1); 73%, 90%, 60%, and 94%, respectively (Agatston?≥100); 30%, 98%, 79%, and 87%, respectively (Agatston?≥1,000). Per-patient values for CTCA were 100%, 98%, 97%, and 100%, respectively (p?<?0.05). CTCA detected 65% prevalence of all CAD (48% non-obstructive), while CACS detected 37% prevalence of all CAD (21% non-obstructive) (p?<?0.05).

Conclusion

CACS proved inadequate for the detection of obstructive and non-obstructive CAD compared with CTCA. CTCA has a high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of non-obstructive and obstructive CAD in high-risk asymptomatic patients with inconclusive or unfeasible stress test results.     

Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in a large population of patients without revascularisation: registry data in NSTEMI acute coronary syndrome and influence of gender and risk factors

Purpose

This study sought to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) for detecting significant coronary artery stenosis (??50% lumen reduction) compared with conventional coronary angiography (CAG) in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction-acute coronary syndrome (NSTEMI-ACS) and in subgroups selected by gender and number of risk factors (RF).

Materials and methods

We selected from a population of 1,500 patients in a multicentre registry with NSTEMI-ACS who had undergone CTCA and CAG, (n=237; 187 men, mean age 63±10 years). Diagnostic accuracy and likelihood ratios (LR) of CTCA were assessed against CAG in the total population and subgroups (men, women: 0 RF = absence of RF, 1?C2 RF = presence of one or two RF, >2 RF = presence of more than two RF).

Results

The prevalence of obstructive disease was 53%. In the per-patient analysis, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of CTCA were 100% (men 100%; women 100%; 0 RF 100%; 1?C2 RF 100%; >2 RF 100%), 95% (men 98%; women 50%; 0 RF NA% (NA, not assessable); 1?C2 RF 96%; >2 RF 96%), 95% (men 98%; women 91%; 0 RF 91%; 1?C2 RF 96%; >2 RF 96%), 100% (men 100%; women 100%; 0 RF NV%; 1?C2 RF 100%; >2 RF 100%), respectively. The per-segment analysis showed a reduction in PPV (ranging between 56% and 67%). The per-patient LR+ ranged between 18 and 27, whereas LR-were always 0. We observed no significant differences in diagnostic accuracy between subgroups.

Conclusions

CTCA is a reliable diagnostic modality with high sensitivity and NPV in NSTEMI-ACS patients who are not candidates for early revascularisation, regardless of gender and number of risk factors.     

Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in a large population of patients without revascularisation: registry data on the comparison between male and female population

Purpose

This study was undertaken to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) for detecting significant coronary artery stenosis (??50% lumen reduction) compared with conventional coronary angiography (CAG) in a male and female population.

Material and methods

A total of 1,372 patients (882 men, 490 women; mean age 59.3 ± 11.9 years) in sinus rhythm imaged with CTCA (64-slice technology) and CAG were enrolled. Diagnostic accuracy and likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR?) of CTCA were assessed against CAG for the male and female populations.

Results

The prevalence of obstructive disease was 53% (men 58%; women 43%). CAG demonstrated the absence of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in 47% (men 42%; women 56%), single-vessel disease in 25% (men 36%; women 22%) and multivessel disease in 29% (men 32%; women 23%) of patients. In the per-patient analysis, sensitivity, specificity and positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values of CTCA were 99% (men 98%; women 100%), 92% (men 92%; women 92%), 94% (men 95%; women 90%) and 99% (men 98%; women 100%), respectively. The per-patient likelihood ratios (LR) in the total population (LR+=12.4 and LR?=0.011), the male (LR+=12.9 and LR?=0.016) and female (LR =11.9 and LR?=0) populations were very good. We observed no significant differences in diagnostic accuracy between male and female populations.

Conclusions

CTCA is a reliable diagnostic modality with high sensitivity and NPV in the female population.     

Prognostic value of Morise clinical score, calcium score and computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease

Purpose

Our aim was to determine the prognostic value of computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA), coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) and Morise clinical score in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).

Materials and methods

A total of 722 patients (480 men; 62.7±10.9 years) who were referred for further cardiac evaluation underwent CACS and contrast-enhanced CTCA to evaluate the presence and severity of CAD. Of these, 511 (71%) patients were without previous history of CAD. Patients were stratified according to the Morise clinical score (low, intermediate, high), to CACS (0?C10, 11?C100, 101?C400, 401?C1,000, >1,000) and to CTCA (absence of CAD, nonsignificant CAD, obstructive CAD). Patients were followed up for the occurrence of major events: cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina and revascularisation.

Results

Significant CAD (>50% luminal narrowing) was detected in 260 (36%) patients; nonsignificant CAD (<50% luminal narrowing) in 250 (35%) and absence of CAD in 212 (29%). During a mean follow-up of 20±4 months, 116 events (21 hard) occurred. In patients with normal coronary arteries on CTCA, the major event rate was 0% vs. 1.7% in patients with nonsignificant CAD and 7.3% in patients with significant CAD (p<0.0001). Three hard events (14%) occurred in patients with CACS??100 and two (9.5%) in patients with intermediate Morise score; one revascularisation was observed in a patient with low Morise score. At multivariate analysis, diabetes, obstructive CAD and CACS >1,000 were significant predictors of events (p<0.05).

Conclusions

An excellent prognosis was noted in patients with a normal CTCA (0% event rate). CACS ??100 and low-intermediate Morise score did not exclude the possibility of events at follow-up.     

Diagnostic accuracy of 128-slice dual-source CT coronary angiography: a randomized comparison of different acquisition protocols

Objectives

To compare the diagnostic performance and radiation exposure of 128-slice dual-source CT coronary angiography (CTCA) protocols to detect coronary stenosis with more than 50 % lumen obstruction.

Methods

We prospectively included 459 symptomatic patients referred for CTCA. Patients were randomized between high-pitch spiral vs. narrow-window sequential CTCA protocols (heart rate below 65 bpm, group A), or between wide-window sequential vs. retrospective spiral protocols (heart rate above 65 bpm, group B). Diagnostic performance of CTCA was compared with quantitative coronary angiography in 267 patients.

Results

In group A (231 patients, 146 men, mean heart rate 58?±?7 bpm), high-pitch spiral CTCA yielded a lower per-segment sensitivity compared to sequential CTCA (89 % vs. 97 %, P?=?0.01). Specificity, PPV and NPV were comparable (95 %, 62 %, 99 % vs. 96 %, 73 %, 100 %, P?>?0.05) but radiation dose was lower (1.16?±?0.60 vs. 3.82?±?1.65 mSv, P?<?0.001). In group B (228 patients, 132 men, mean heart rate 75?±?11 bpm), per-segment sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were comparable (94 %, 95 %, 67 %, 99 % vs. 92 %, 95 %, 66 %, 99 %, P?>?0.05). Radiation dose of sequential CTCA was lower compared to retrospective CTCA (6.12?±?2.58 vs. 8.13?±?4.52 mSv, P?<?0.001). Diagnostic performance was comparable in both groups.

Conclusion

Sequential CTCA should be used in patients with regular heart rates using 128-slice dual-source CT, providing optimal diagnostic accuracy with as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) radiation dose.

Key Points

? 128-slice dual-source CT coronary angiography offers several different acquisition protocols. ? Randomized comparison of protocols reveals an optimal protocol selection strategy. ? Appropriate CTCA protocol selection lowers radiation dose, while maintaining high quality. ? CTCA protocol selection should be based on individual patient characteristics. ? A prospective sequential protocol is preferred for CTCA.     

Stress-ECG vs. CT coronary angiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a “real-world” experience

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of stress electrocardiogram (ECG) and computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) for the detection of significant coronary artery stenosis (≥50%) in the real world using conventional CA as the reference standard.

Materials and methods

A total of 236 consecutive patients (159 men, 77 women; mean age 62.8±10.2 years) at moderate risk and with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) were enrolled in the study and underwent stress ECG, CTCA and CA. The CTCA scan was performed after i.v. administration of a 100-ml bolus of iodinated contrast material. The stress ECG and CTCA reports were used to evaluate diagnostic accuracy compared with CA in the detection of significant stenosis ≥50%.

Results

We excluded 16 patients from the analysis because of the nondiagnostic quality of stress ECG and/or CTCA. The prevalence of disease demonstrated at CA was 62% (n=220), 51% in the population with comparable stress ECG and CTCA (n=147) and 84% in the population with equivocal stress ECG (n=73). Stress ECG was classified as equivocal in 73 cases (33.2%), positive in 69 (31.4%) and negative in 78 (35.5%). In the per-patient analysis, the diagnostic accuracy of stress ECG was sensitivity 47%, specificity 53%, positive predictive value (PPV) 51% and negative predictive value (NPV) 49%. On stress ECG, 40 (27.2%) patients were misclassified as negative, and 34 (23.1%) patients with nonsignificant stenosis were overestimated as positive. The diagnostic accuracy of CTCA was sensitivity 96%, specificity 65%, PPV 74% and NPV 94%. CTCA incorrectly classified three (2%) as negative and 25 (17%) as positive. The difference in diagnostic accuracy between stress ECG and CTCA was significant (p<0.01).

Conclusions

CTCA in the real world has significantly higher diagnostic accuracy compared with stress ECG and could be used as a first-line study in patients at moderate risk.     

Computed tomography coronary angiography accuracy in women and men at low to intermediate risk of coronary artery disease

Objectives

To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of CT coronary angiography (CTCA) in women at low to intermediate pre-test probability of coronary artery disease (CAD) compared with men.

Methods

In this retrospective study we included symptomatic patients with low to intermediate risk who underwent both invasive coronary angiography and CTCA. Exclusion criteria were previous revascularisation or myocardial infarction. The pre-test probability of CAD was estimated using the Duke risk score. Thresholds of less than 30?% and 30–90?% were used for determining low and intermediate risk, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of CTCA in detecting obstructive CAD (≥50?% lumen diameter narrowing) was calculated on patient level. P?<?0.05 was considered significant.

Results

A total of 570 patients (46?% women [262/570]) were included and stratified as low (women 73?% [80/109]) and intermediate risk (women 39?% [182/461]). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were not significantly different in and between women and men at low and intermediate risk. For women vs. men at low risk they were 97?% vs. 100?%, 79?% vs. 90?%, 80?% vs. 80?% and 97?% vs. 100?%, respectively. For intermediate risk they were 99?% vs. 99?%, 72?% vs. 83?%, 88?% vs. 93?% and 98?% vs. 99?%, respectively.

Conclusion

CTCA has similar diagnostic accuracy in women and men at low and intermediate risk.

Key Points

? Coronary artery disease (CAD) is increasingly investigated by computed tomography angiography (CTCA). ? CAD detection or exclusion by CTCA is not different between sexes. ? CTCA diagnostic accuracy was similar between low and intermediate risk sex-specific-groups. ? CTCA rarely misses obstructive CAD in low–intermediate risk women and men. ? CAD yield by invasive coronary angiography after positive CTCA is similar between sex-risk-specific groups.     

Computed tomography coronary angiography in asymptomatic patients

Purpose

This study assessed the accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography (CT-CA) for detecting significant coronary artery disease (CAD; ??50% lumen reduction) in intermediate/high-risk asymptomatic patients.

Materials and methods

A total of 183 consecutive asymptomatic individuals (92 men; mean age 54??11 years) with more than one major risk factor (obesity, hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolaemia, family history, smoking) and an inconclusive or nonfeasible noninvasive stress test result (stress electrocardiography, stress echocardiography, nuclear stress scintigraphy) underwent CT-CA in an outpatient setting. All patients underwent conventional coronary angiography (CAG) within 4 weeks. Data from CT-CA were compared with CAG regarding the presence of significant CAD (??50% lumen reduction).

Results

Mean calcium score was 177??432, mean heart rate during the CT-CA scan was 58??8 bpm and the prevalence (per-patient) of obstructive CAD was 19%. CT-CA showed single-vessel CAD in 9% of patients, two-vessel CAD in 9% and three-vessel CAD in 0%. Per-patient sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of CT-CA were 100% (90?C100), 98% (96?C99), 97% (85?C99), 100% (97?C100), respectively. Positive and negative likelihood ratios were 151 and 0, respectively.

Conclusions

CT-CA is an excellent noninvasive imaging modality for excluding significant CAD in intermediate/ high-risk asymptomatic patients with inconclusive or nonfeasible noninvasive stress test.     

Accuracy of automated software-guided detection of significant coronary artery stenosis by CT angiography: comparison with invasive catheterisation

Purpose

True automated detection of coronary artery stenoses might be useful whenever expert evaluation is not available, or as a “second reader” to enhance diagnostic confidence. We evaluated the accuracy of a PC-based stenosis detection tool alone and combined with expert interpretation.

Methods

One hundred coronary CT angiography datasets were evaluated with the automated software alone, by manual interpretation (axial images, multiplanar reformations and maximum intensity projections in free double-oblique planes), and by expert interpretation aware of the automated findings. Stenoses ≥?50 % were noted per-vessel and per-patient, and compared with invasive angiography.

Results

Automated post-processing was successful in 90 % of patients (88 % of vessels). When excluding uninterpretable datasets, per-patient sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 89 %, 79 %, 74 % and 92 % (per-vessel: 82 %, 85 %, 48 % and 96 %). All 100 datasets were evaluable by expert interpretation. Per-patient sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 95 %, 95 %, 93 % and 97 % (per-vessel: 89 %,98 %, 88 % and 98 %). Knowing the results of automated interpretation did not improve the performance of expert readers.

Conclusion

Automated off-line post-processing of coronary CT angiography shows adequate sensitivity, but relatively low specificity in coronary stenosis detection. It does not increase accuracy of expert interpretation. Failure of post-processing in 10 % of all patients necessitates additional manual image work-up.

Key Points

? Coronary CT angiography is increasingly used for detection of coronary artery stenosis ? Computer assisted diagnosis might facilitate and speed up interpretation ? Performance in properly segmented cases compared favourably with manual image interpretation ? However, automated segmentation failed in about 10 % of cases ? Manual reading is still mandatory; computer assisted diagnosis can provide a useful second read     

Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in a large population of patients without revascularisation: registry data and review of multicentre trials

Purpose

This study was undertaken to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography (CT-CA) for the detection of significant coronary artery stenosis (≥50% lumen reduction) compared with conventional coronary angiography (CCA) in a registry and to review major multicentre trials.

Materials and methods

A total of 1,372 patients (882 men, 490 women; mean age 59.3±11.9 years) in sinus rhythm were studied with CT-CA (64-slice technology) and CCA. The diagnostic accuracy of CT-CA was evaluated against quantitative CCA as a reference standard for coronary artery stenosis. Positive and negative likelihood ratios and inter- and intraobserver agreement were calculated.

Results

The prevalence of disease was 53%. CCA demonstrated the absence of significant coronary artery disease in 46.6% (639/1372), single-vessel disease in 24.7% (337/1372) and multivessel disease in 28.9% (396/1372) of patients. In per-patient analysis sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive value of CT-CA were 99% [confidence interval (CI) 97–99], 92% (CI 89–94), 94% (CI 91–95) and 99% (CI 97–99), respectively. Per-patient and per-segment likelihood ratios (LR+=12.4 and LR?=0.011; LR+=18.3 and LR?=0.064, respectively), were good. Inter- and intraobserver variability was 0.78 and 0.85, respectively.

Conclusions

CT-CA is a reliable diagnostic modality both in terms of sensitivity and negative predictive value. Differences in trial results are also due to the different parameters used for patient inclusion.     

Diagnostic performance of post-treatment FDG PET or FDG PET/CT imaging in head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

Our objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies assessing the diagnostic performance of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) with or without computed tomography (CT) in post-treatment response assessment and/or surveillance imaging of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

Methods

A systematic search of the indexed medical literature was done using appropriate keywords to identify relevant studies. Metrics of diagnostic test accuracy, viz. sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were extracted from individual studies and combined using a random effects model to yield weighted mean pooled estimates with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The impact of timing of post-treatment scan, study quality and advancements in PET technology was explored through meta-regression.

Results

A total of 51 studies involving 2,335 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The weighted mean (95% CI) pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of post-treatment FDG PET(CT) for the primary site was 79.9% (73.7?C85.2%), 87.5% (85.2?C89.5%), 58.6% (52.6?C64.5%) and 95.1% (93.5?C96.5%), respectively. Similar estimates for the neck were 72.7% (66.6?C78.2%), 87.6% (85.7?C89.3%), 52.1% (46.6?C57.6%) and 94.5% (93.1?C95.7%), respectively. Scans done ??12?weeks after completion of definitive therapy had moderately higher diagnostic accuracy on meta-regression analysis using time as a covariate.

Conclusion

The overall diagnostic performance of post-treatment FDG PET(CT) for response assessment and surveillance imaging of HNSCC is good, but its PPV is somewhat suboptimal. Its NPV remains exceptionally high and a negative post-treatment scan is highly suggestive of absence of viable disease that can guide therapeutic decision-making. Timing of post-treatment imaging has a significant, though moderate impact on diagnostic accuracy.     

Diagnostic performance of computed tomography coronary angiography to detect and exclude left main and/or three-vessel coronary artery disease

Objectives

To determine the diagnostic performance of CT coronary angiography (CTCA) in detecting and excluding left main (LM) and/or three-vessel CAD (“high-risk” CAD) in symptomatic patients and to compare its discriminatory value with the Duke risk score and calcium score.

Materials and methods

Between 2004 and 2011, a total of 1,159 symptomatic patients (61?±?11 years, 31 % women) with stable angina, without prior revascularisation underwent both invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and CTCA. All patients gave written informed consent for the additional CTCA. High-risk CAD was defined as LM and/or three-vessel obstructive CAD (≥50 % diameter stenosis).

Results

A total of 197 (17 %) patients had high-risk CAD as determined by ICA. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive and negative likelihood ratios of CTCA were 95 % (95 % CI 91–97 %), 83 % (80–85 %), 53 % (48–58 %), 99 % (98–99 %), 5.47 and 0.06, respectively. CTCA provided incremental value (AUC 0.90, P?<?0.001) in the discrimination of high-risk CAD compared with the Duke risk score and calcium score.

Conclusions

CTCA accurately excludes high-risk CAD in symptomatic patients. The detection of high-risk CAD is suboptimal owing to the high percentage (47 %) of overestimation of high-risk CAD. CTCA provides incremental value in the discrimination of high-risk CAD compared with the Duke risk score and calcium score.

Key Points

? Computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) accurately excludes high-risk coronary artery disease. ? CTCA overestimates high-risk coronary artery disease in 47?%. ? CTCA discriminates high-risk CAD better than clinical evaluation and coronary calcification.     

Coronary computed tomography angiography using 128-slice dual-source computed tomography in patients with severe calcification

Purpose

To compare coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and coronary angiography (CAG) with regard to luminal graphic definition of calcified segments using 128-slice dual-source computed tomography (DSCT), specifically for patients with an Agatston score >400.

Materials and methods

Of 1148 consecutive patients who underwent coronary CTA using a 128-slice DSCT, 132 subjects had severe calcification with an Agatston score >400. Thirty-nine of the 132 patients who had undergone CAG within 3 months before or after coronary CTA were included. We investigated the distribution of calcification, and we visually evaluated significant stenosis in the calcified and all segments. Results were compared with CAG.

Results

The target group in this study had a very high mean Agatston score of 1771 ± 1724. Results for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 247 calcified vs all 325 segments were as follows: sensitivity 93.2 vs 92.2%, specificity 83.9 vs 87.5%, PPV 70.8 vs 69.6%, and NPV 96.7 vs 97.3%, respectively.

Conclusion

128-slice DSCT has potential for evaluation of calcified segments in the lumen, even in patients whose Agatston score exceeds 400.

     

Diagnostic accuracy of high-pitch dual-source CT for the assessment of coronary stenoses: first experience

Objectives

The objective was to prospectively investigate the diagnostic accuracy of high-pitch (HP) dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) compared with catheter coronary angiography (CCA) for the diagnosis of significant coronary stenoses.

Methods

Thirty-five patients (seven women; mean age 62?±?8 years) underwent both CTCA and CCA. CTCA was performed with a second-generation dual-source CT system permitting data acquisition at an HP of 3.4. Patients with heart rates >60 bpm were excluded from study enrolment. All coronary segments were evaluated by two blinded and independent observers with regard to image quality on a four-point scale (1: excellent to 4: non-diagnostic) and for the presence of significant coronary stenoses (defined as diameter narrowing exceeding 50%). CCA served as the standard of reference. Radiation dose values were calculated using the dose-length product.

Results

Diagnostic image quality was found in 99% of all segments (455/459). Non-diagnostic image quality occurred in a single patient with a sudden increase in heart rate immediately before and during CTCA. Taking segments with non-evaluative image quality as positive for disease, the sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were 94, 96, 80 and 99% per segment and 100, 91, 88 and 100% per patient. The effective radiation dose was on average 0.9?±?0.1 mSv.

Conclusion

In patients with heart rates ≤60 bpm, CTCA using the HP mode of the dual-source CT system is associated with high diagnostic accuracy for the assessment of coronary artery stenoses at sub-milliSievert doses.     

Diagnostic value of full-dose FDG PET/CT for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer patients

Purpose

The aims of this study were (1) to evaluate FDG PET/CT and CT for the detection of axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer (BC) patients and (2) to evaluate FDG PET/CT as a pre-test for the triage to sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) versus axillary lymph node dissection (ALND).

Methods

The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV, NPV), and accuracy of FDG PET/CT and CT for axillary lymph node metastases were determined in 61 patients (gold standard: histopathology). According to the equation “NPV = specificity ? (1-prevalence) / [specificity ? (1-prevalence) + (1-sensitivity) ? prevalence]” FDG PET/CT was evaluated as a triage tool for SLNB versus ALND.

Results

The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of FDG PET/CT was 58, 92, 82, 77 and 79% and of CT 46, 89, 72, 71 and 72%, respectively. Patients with an up to ~60% risk for axillary lymph node metastases appear to be candidates for SLNB provided that the axilla is unremarkable on FDG PET/CT.

Conclusion

FDG PET/CT cannot replace invasive approaches for axillary staging but may extend the indication for SLNB.     

CT colonography without cathartic preparation: positive predictive value and patient experience in clinical practice

Objective

To determine the positive predictive value (PPV) for polyps ≥6?mm detected at CT colonography (CTC) performed without cathartic preparation, with low-dose iodine faecal tagging regimen and to evaluate patient experience.

Methods

1920 average-risk patients underwent CTC without cathartic preparation. Faecal tagging was performed by diatrizoate meglumine and diatrizoate sodium at a total dose of 60?ml (22.2?g of iodine).The standard interpretation method was primary 3D with 2D problem solving. We calculated per-patient and per-polyp PPV in relation to size and morphology. All colonic segments were evaluated for image quality (faecal tagging, amount of liquid and solid residual faeces and luminal distension). Patients completed a questionnaire before and after CTC to assess preparation and examination experience.

Results

Per-polyp PPV for detected lesions of ≥6?mm, 6–9?mm, ≥10?mm and ≥30?mm were 94.3%, 93.1%, 94.7% and 98%, respectively. Per-polyp PPV, according to lesion morphology, was 94.6%, 97.3% and 85.1% for sessile, pedunculated and flat polyps, respectively. Per-patient PPV was 92.8%. Preparation without frank cathartics was reported to cause minimal discomfort by 78.9% of patients.

Conclusion

CTC without cathartic preparation and low-dose iodine faecal tagging may yield high PPVs for lesions ≥6?mm and is well accepted by patients.

Key Points

? Computed tomographic colonography (CTC) without cathartic preparation is well accepted by patients ? Cathartic-free faecal tagging CTC yields high positive predictive values ? CTC without cathartic preparation could improve uptake of colorectal cancer screening     

Restriction of the referral of patients with stable angina for CT coronary angiography by clinical evaluation and calcium score: impact on clinical decision making

Objective

To investigate the value of the calcium score (CaSc) plus clinical evaluation to restrict referral for CT coronary angiography (CTCA) by reducing the number of patients with an intermediate probability of coronary artery disease (CAD).

Methods

We retrospectively included 1,975 symptomatic stable patients who underwent clinical evaluation and CaSc calculation and CTCA or invasive coronary coronary angiography (ICA). The outcome was obstructive CAD (≥50 % diameter narrowing) assessed by ICA or CTCA in the absence of ICA. We investigated two models: (1) clinical evaluation consisting of chest pain typicality, gender, age, risk factors and ECG and (2) clinical evaluation with CaSc. Discrimination of the two models was compared. The stepwise reclassification of patients with an intermediate probability of CAD (10–90 %) after clinical evaluation followed by clinical evaluation with CaSc was assessed by clinical net reclassification improvement (NRI).

Results

Discrimination of CAD was significantly improved by adding CaSc to the clinical evaluation (AUC: 0.80 vs. 0.89, P?<?0.001). CaSc and CTCA could be avoided in 9 % using model 1 and an additional 29 % of CTCAs could be avoided using model 2. Clinical NRI was 57 %.

Conclusion

CaSc plus clinical evaluation may be useful in restricting further referral for CTCA by 38 % in symptomatic stable patients with suspected CAD.

Key Points

? CT calcium scores (CaSc) could proiritise referrals for CT coronary angiography (CTCA) ? CaSc provides an incremental discriminatory value of CAD compared with clinical evaluation ? Risk stratification is better when clinical evaluation is combined with CaSc ? Appropriate use of clinical evaluation and CaSc helps avoid unnecessary CTCA referrals     

Coronary artery disease: Which degree of coronary artery stenosis is indicative of ischemia?

Purpose

To prospectively determine the best cut-off value of stenosis degree for low-dose computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) to predict the hemodynamic significance of coronary artery stenoses compared to catheter angiography (CA) using a cardiac magnetic resonance based approach as standard of reference.

Materials and methods

Fifty-two patients (mean age, 64 ± 10 years) scheduled for CA underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) at 1.5-T and dual-source CTCA using prospective ECG-triggering the same day. Diagnostic performance of CTCA and CA to detect myocardial ischemia was evaluated with CMR as the standard of reference. The diagnostic performance and best cut-off values to predict the hemodynamic significance of coronary were determined from receiver operating characteristics analysis (ROC).

Results

CA revealed >50% stenoses in 131/832 segments (15.7%) in 78/156 (50.0%) coronary arteries in 32/52 (62%) patients. CTCA revealed >50% stenoses in 148/807 (18.3%) segments, corresponding to 83/156 (53.2%) coronary arteries in 34/52 (65.4%) patients. CMR revealed ischemia in 118/832 (14.2%) myocardial segments corresponding to the territories of 60/156 (38.5%) coronary arteries in 29/52 (56%) patients. ROC analysis showed equal diagnostic performance for low-dose CTCA and CA with areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.82 and 0.83 (P = 0.64). The optimal cut-off value was determined at stenosis of >60% for the prediction of hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis by CTCA. Using this cut-off value, sensitivity, specificity, NPV and PPV to predict hemodynamic significance by CTCA were 100%, 83%, 100%, and 88% on a per-patient basis and 88%, 73%, 83% and 81% on a per-artery analysis, respectively.

Conclusion

By considering coronary stenosis >60%, diagnostic performance for predicting the hemodynamic significance of coronary stenosis by CTCA is optimal and equals that of CA.     

Diagnostic accuracy of low-dose 256-slice multi-detector coronary CT angiography using iterative reconstruction in patients with suspected coronary artery disease

Objectives

To evaluate the accuracy of low-dose coronary CTA with iterative reconstruction (IR) in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with suspected CAD.

Methods

Ninety-six patients with suspected CAD underwent low-dose prospective electrocardiogram-gated coronary CTA, with images reconstructed using IR. Image quality (IQ) of coronary segments were graded on a 4-point scale (4, excellent; 1, non-diagnostic). With invasive coronary angiography (ICA) considered the “gold standard”, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of coronary CTA were calculated on segment-, vessel- and patient-based levels. The patient data were divided into two groups (Agatston scores of ≥ 400 and <400). The differences in diagnostic performance between the two groups were tested.

Results

Diagnostic image quality was found in 98.1 % (1,232/1,256) of segments. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy were 90.8 %, 95.3 %, 81.8 %, 97.8 % and 94.3 % (segment-based) and 97.2 %, 83.3 %, 94.6 %, 90.9 % and 93.8 % (patient-based). Significant differences between the two groups were seen in specificity, PPV and accuracy (92.1 % vs. 97.9 %, 76.0 % vs. 86.7 %, 91.7 % vs. 96.6 %, P?<?0.05; segment-based). The average effective dose was 1.30?±?0.15 mSv.

Conclusion

Low-dose prospective coronary CTA with IR can acquire satisfactory image quality and show high diagnostic accuracy in patients with suspected CAD; however, blooming continues to pose a challenge in severely calcified segments.

Key Points

? Coronary artery disease (CAD) is increasingly investigated using coronary CTA. ? The iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithm is promising in decreasing radiation doses. ? Low-dose prospective coronary CTA with IR can acquire satisfactory image quality. ? Low-dose prospective coronary CTA with IR can show high diagnostic accuracy.     

Coronary CT angiography: image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and potential for radiation dose reduction using a novel iterative image reconstruction technique��comparison with traditional filtered back projection

Objectives

To compare image noise, image quality and diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography (cCTA) using a novel iterative reconstruction algorithm versus traditional filtered back projection (FBP) and to estimate the potential for radiation dose savings.

Methods

Sixty five consecutive patients (48 men; 59.3?±?7.7?years) prospectively underwent cCTA and coronary catheter angiography (CCA). Full radiation dose data, using all projections, were reconstructed with FBP. To simulate image acquisition at half the radiation dose, 50% of the projections were discarded from the raw data. The resulting half-dose data were reconstructed with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE). Full-dose FBP and half-dose iterative reconstructions were compared with regard to image noise and image quality, and their respective accuracy for stenosis detection was compared against CCA.

Results

Compared with full-dose FBP, half-dose iterative reconstructions showed significantly (p?=?0.001 ?C p?=?0.025) lower image noise and slightly higher image quality. Iterative reconstruction improved the accuracy of stenosis detection compared with FBP (per-patient: accuracy 96.9% vs. 93.8%, sensitivity 100% vs. 100%, specificity 94.6% vs. 89.2%, NPV 100% vs. 100%, PPV 93.3% vs. 87.5%).

Conclusions

Iterative reconstruction significantly reduces image noise without loss of diagnostic information and holds the potential for substantial radiation dose reduction from cCTA.