Pharmacotherapy for cocaine-abusing methadone-maintained patients using amantadine or desipramine.

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled 12-week randomized clinical trial, we compared amantadine hydrochloride (300 mg/d; n = 33), desipramine hydrochloride (150 mg/d; n = 30), and placebo (n = 31) in the treatment of cocaine-abusing methadone-maintained patients. Treatment retention and medication compliance were excellent, with more than 75% of the patients completing the full 12-week trial. Although reported cocaine abuse was significantly lower in the medicated groups compared with the placebo group at week 4, this difference became nonsignificant at week 8, and no difference was found in cocaine-free urine samples. Future studies of amantadine and desipramine treatment in these patients should consider alternatives to methadone hydrochloride, such as buprenorphine hydrochloride, and the selection of more homogeneous patient subgroups, such as depressed cocaine abusers.     

Desipramine facilitation of initial cocaine abstinence

We conducted a double-blind, random assignment, six-week comparison of desipramine hydrochloride (n = 24), lithium carbonate (n = 24), and placebo (n = 24) treatments for cocaine dependence. Subjects were 72 outpatient cocaine abusers who met DSM-III-R dependence criteria for cocaine but not for other substance abuse. Subjects in each treatment group were similar in history of cocaine and other substance abuse, cocaine craving, sociodemographics, and other psychiatric comorbidity. Desipramine, compared with both other treatments, substantially decreased cocaine use. Lithium treatment outcome did not differ from that of placebo. Desipramine-treated subjects attained contiguous periods of abstinence substantially more frequently than subjects receiving lithium or placebo. Fifty-nine percent of the desipramine-treated subjects were abstinent for at least three to four consecutive weeks during the six-week study period, compared with 17% for placebo and 25% for lithium. Cocaine craving reductions were also substantially greater in the desipramine-treated subjects. Establishment of initial abstinence is the first stage in recovery from cocaine dependence. Our findings indicate that desipramine is an effective general treatment, for this first treatment stage, in actively cocaine-dependent outpatients.     

Methadone versus buprenorphine with contingency management or performance feedback for cocaine and opioid dependence

OBJECTIVE: Physicians may prescribe buprenorphine for opioid agonist maintenance treatment outside of narcotic treatment programs, but treatment guidelines for patients with co-occurring cocaine and opioid dependence are not available. This study compares effects of buprenorphine and methadone and evaluates the efficacy of combining contingency management with maintenance treatment for patients with co-occurring cocaine and opioid dependence. METHOD: Subjects with cocaine and opioid dependence (N=162) were provided manual-guided counseling and randomly assigned in a double-blind design to receive daily sublingual buprenorphine (12-16 mg) or methadone (65-85 mg p.o.) and to contingency management or performance feedback. Contingency management subjects received monetary vouchers for opioid- and cocaine-negative urine tests, which were conducted three times a week; voucher value escalated during the first 12 weeks for consecutive drug-free tests and was reduced to a nominal value in weeks 13-24. Performance feedback subjects received slips of paper indicating the urine test results. The primary outcome measures were the maximum number of consecutive weeks abstinent from illicit opioids and cocaine and the proportion of drug-free tests. Analytic models included two-by-two analysis of variance and mixed-model repeated-measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: Methadone-treated subjects remained in treatment significantly longer and achieved significantly longer periods of sustained abstinence and a greater proportion drug-free tests, compared with subjects who received buprenorphine. Subjects receiving contingency management achieved significantly longer periods of abstinence and a greater proportion drug-free tests during the period of escalating voucher value, compared with those who received performance feedback, but there were no significant differences between groups in these variables during the entire 24-week study. CONCLUSIONS: Methadone may be superior to buprenorphine for maintenance treatment of patients with co-occurring cocaine and opioid dependence. Combining methadone or buprenorphine with contingency management may improve treatment outcome.     

Vergleichsuntersuchung von Buprenorphin und Methadon im Rahmen der Erhaltungstherapie Opiatkranker

The efficacy of buprenorphine in opioid dependent patients (n = 20) was compared to methadone maintained subjects (n = 20) in a randomized comparison trial. Sublingual application of buprenorphine as an alternative synthetical opioid is being compared to methadone during a 24 week study period. A trend (p = 0.06) could be found in the retention rate of investigated patients being maintained on a mean dosage of 63 mg oral applicable methadone (racemat of L- and D-methadone) in comparison to the group on a mean dosage of 7.3 mg buprenorphine (sublingual tablets). The dropout-rate of 11 subjects at the end of the study in the buprenorphine group was higher when compared to the dropout-rate of 5 in the methadone group. There was no significant difference between the two groups over the treatment period in respect to additional consumption of opiates, benzodiazepines and cocaine as evaluated through urine toxicology. The result in regard to compliance over the study period demonstrates that methadone appears to be the more successful oral opioid (p = 0.04). Nevertheless, efficacy of buprenorphine in maintenance could be demonstrated in the remaining subjects, and further studies with higher daily doses and a higher number of subjects have to be performed.     

A double-blind comparison of desipramine and placebo in children and adolescents with chronic tic disorder and comorbid attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no consensus on the best therapeutic approach to chronic tic disorders and comorbid attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). To address this issue, we evaluated the tolerability and efficacy of the noradrenergic tricyclic antidepressant desipramine hydrochloride in the treatment of children and adolescents with chronic tic disorders and comorbid ADHD. METHODS: Forty-one children and adolescents with chronic tic disorders, including Tourette disorder and comorbid ADHD, were studied in a 6-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel trial. Desipramine was titrated weekly up to 3.5 mg/kg per day. We rated ADHD and tic symptoms weekly and monitored adverse effects, laboratory findings, and cardiovascular parameters. RESULTS: Treatment with desipramine (mean total daily dose, 3.4 mg/kg per day) was well tolerated without meaningful adverse effects. Desipramine significantly reduced core symptoms of ADHD (ADHD Rating Scale; 42% decrease from baseline relative to placebo, P<.001), with equal response in inattentive symptoms and hyperactive/impulsive symptoms (P<.001 for both). The ADHD response rate was robust (71% vs 0%; desipramine vs placebo, P<.001). Likewise, desipramine significantly reduced tic symptoms (Yale Global Tic Severity Scale; 30% decrease from baseline relative to placebo, P<.001), with equal response in motor and phonic tic symptoms (P<.01 for both). The tic response rate was substantial (58% vs 5%; desipramine vs placebo, P<.001). There were small but statistically significant differences between desipramine and placebo in heart rate and blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with desipramine was well tolerated and was associated with robust clinically significant reductions in tic and ADHD symptoms in children and adolescents with chronic tic disorders and ADHD diagnoses.     

Antecedents and consequences of cocaine abuse among opioid addicts. A 2.5-year follow-up

During a 2.5-year follow-up of opioid addicts, we examined psychosocial antecedents and consequences of the onset and remission of cocaine abuse. Patients who never used cocaine were compared with those whose use increased or decreased along several dimensions of treatment outcome including drug abuse, legal, employment, family, social, psychological, and medical problems. Cocaine abuse had a marked impact on almost every outcome area except medical problems. Patients whose cocaine use increased during follow-up had more severe problems than either those whose use decreased or those who never used cocaine. Furthermore, the attainment of cocaine abstinence among abusers was associated with improved psychosocial functioning, whereas the onset of cocaine abuse was associated with increased problem severity. Compared with drug-free and detoxification alone treatments, methadone maintenance may minimize legal complications of cocaine abuse, but otherwise it did not significantly reduce psychosocial morbidity from increasing cocaine abuse. These findings suggest that treatment-seeking opioid addicts are vulnerable to wide-ranging deterioration when they become increasingly involved with cocaine but that with the attainment of abstinence many problem areas improve.     

A 2.5-year follow-up of cocaine use among treated opioid addicts. Have our treatments helped?

During a 2.5-year follow-up study of opioid addicts, we found that cocaine abuse had become an increasing and major problem through 1983. Cocaine abuse had only minimally declined during the follow-up period despite treatment, and the number of opioid addicts with at least weekly cocaine abuse had doubled. The clear effect of methadone maintenance treatment in reducing opioid abuse was not evident for cocaine abuse. During the follow-up period, more cocaine use was reported by the methadone-treated subjects than by those undergoing detoxification only. Prognostically, cocaine users were more likely to be nonwhites and men. Subjects who increased their cocaine use during the follow-up period were more likely to have depressive disorders and more likely to be found among methadone- and "drug-free"-treated subjects than among detoxification subjects. Thus, among methadone- and drug-free-treated subjects, depression appeared to be a risk factor for escalating cocaine abuse; this risk factor may benefit from specific interventions.     

Comparison of pharmacological treatments for opioid-dependent adolescents: a randomized controlled trial

CONTEXT: The prevalence of heroin and other opioid use has markedly increased among adolescents in the last decade; however, virtually no research has been conducted to identify effective treatments for this population. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relative efficacy of 2 pharmacotherapies, the partial opioid agonist buprenorphine hydrochloride and the centrally active alpha(2)-adrenergic blocker clonidine hydrochloride, in the detoxification of opioid-dependent adolescents. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: A double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-groups randomized controlled trial conducted in a university-based research clinic from October 2001 to December 2003. Patients were a volunteer sample of 36 adolescents who met DSM-IV criteria for opioid dependence (ages 13-18 years eligible). INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned to a 28-day, outpatient, medication-assisted withdrawal treatment with either buprenorphine or clonidine. Both medications were provided along with thrice weekly behavioral counseling and incentives contingent on opiate abstinence. Postdetoxification, all participants were offered the opportunity for continued treatment with the opiate antagonist, naltrexone hydrochloride. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Treatment retention, opiate abstinence, and human immunodeficiency virus risk behavior, along with measures of withdrawal and medication effects. RESULTS: A significantly greater percentage of adolescents who received buprenorphine were retained in treatment (72%) relative to those who received clonidine (39%) (P<.05). For those in the buprenorphine group, a significantly higher percentage of scheduled urine test results were opiate negative (64% vs 32%; P = .01). Participants in both groups reported relief of withdrawal symptoms and drug-related human immunodeficiency virus risk behavior. Those in the buprenorphine condition generally reported more positive effects of the medication. No evidence of opioid intoxication or psychomotor impairment was observed. Sixty-one percent of participants in the buprenorphine condition and 5% of those in the clonidine group initiated treatment with naltrexone. CONCLUSION: Combining buprenorphine with behavioral interventions is significantly more efficacious in the treatment of opioid-dependent adolescents relative to combining clonidine and behavioral interventions.     

Possible nonlinear pharmacokinetics of desipramine after once daily dosing

Desipramine (DMI) plasma concentrations were measured in depressed outpatients treated with desipramine hydrochloride. Plasma level determinations were measured 24 hours after a single dose of DMI 50 mg, and then at weekly intervals thereafter while receiving once daily bedtime dosing with DMI 150 mg or 200 mg. The 24 hour DMI concentration was significantly, and rather closely correlated with steady state DMI levels (r = 0.74, p less than .001) (prediction coefficient [r2] = 55%). However, steady state plasma levels of DMI were higher than would be predicted based upon prior studies which also examined the relationship between steady state and 24 hour desipramine plasma concentrations. We speculate that the single bedtime administration of DMI in the present study may have led to saturation of metabolic hepatic enzymes during the first pass of the drug through the liver. The possibility of nonlinear DMI pharmacokinetics may be of clinical importance to some patients receiving a single, daily, high dose of medication.     

Dopaminergic responsivity during cocaine abstinence: a pilot study.

This preliminary study investigated dopamine (DA) function in six hospitalized cocaine-dependent subjects (DSM-III-R) who received 1.5 mg/kg of active cocaine by mouth, t.i.d., for 3 days followed by 9 days of placebo cocaine. During early and late abstinence from cocaine, plasma growth hormone (GH), homovanillic acid (HVA), prolactin, and 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenethyleneglycol responses to the placebo-controlled administration of oral L-dopa 250 mg/carbidopa 25 mg (Sinemet) were measured. Sinemet caused significantly greater placebo-corrected increases in GH and HVA during early as compared with late abstinence. Acute abstinence from cocaine may be associated with increased DA responsivity, which normalizes over time.     

Methadone dose increase and abstinence reinforcement for treatment of continued heroin use during methadone maintenance

BACKGROUND: Although methadone maintenance is an effective therapy for heroin dependence, some patients continue to use heroin and may benefit from therapeutic modifications. This study evaluated a behavioral intervention, a pharmacological intervention, and a combination of both interventions. METHODS: Throughout the study all patients received daily methadone hydrochloride maintenance (initially 50 mg/d orally) and weekly counseling. Following baseline treatment patients who continued to use heroin were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 interventions: (1) contingent vouchers for opiate-negative urine specimens (n = 29 patients); (2) methadone hydrochloride dose increase to 70 mg/d (n = 31 patients); (3) combined contingent vouchers and methadone dose increase (n = 32 patients); and (4) neither intervention (comparison standard; n = 28 patients). Methadone dose increases were double blind. Vouchers had monetary value and were exchangeable for goods and services. Groups not receiving contingent vouchers received matching vouchers independent of urine test results. Primary outcome measure was opiate-negative urine specimens (thrice weekly urinalysis). RESULTS: Contingent vouchers and a methadone dose increase each significantly increased the percentage of opiate-negative urine specimens during intervention. Contingent vouchers, with or without a methadone dose increase, increased the duration of sustained abstinence as assessed by urine screenings. Methadone dose increase, with or without contingent vouchers, reduced self-reported frequency of use and self-reported craving. CONCLUSIONS: In patients enrolled in a methadone-maintainence program who continued to use heroin, abstinence reinforcement and a methadone dose increase were each effective in reducing use. When combined, they did not dramatically enhance each other's effects on any 1 outcome measure, but they did seem to have complementary benefits.     

Desipramine treatment of cocaine dependence in methadone-maintained patients.

We performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized 12-week trial of desipramine hydrochloride treatment of cocaine dependence among methadone-maintained patients. Fifty-nine patients completed the 12-week medication trial (36 received desipramine and 23 received placebo), and 94% were recontacted 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. There were significantly more dropouts in the desipramine than in the placebo group. Baseline to 12-week comparisons of Addiction Severity Index interview data indicated that both groups showed improvements. At 12 weeks, the desipramine group showed significantly better psychiatric status than the placebo group but did not differ from the placebo group on any of 21 other outcome measures, including cocaine use. During the 12-week medication phase and at the 1-month follow-up evaluation, urine toxicology screenings showed no significant difference between groups, but the placebo group had significantly less cocaine use at both the 3- and 6-month follow-up points. We conclude that desipramine has few benefits with regard to control of cocaine use in this population.     

Treatment of bulimia with desipramine: a double-blind crossover study

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of desipramine, a tricyclic antidepressant with relatively specific noradrenergic effects, on bulimic behaviour, eating attitudes, and mood. Using a double-blind crossover design, 47 normal weight bulimics were randomly assigned to receive either desipramine (150 mg/day) for six weeks, no drug for three weeks, followed by placebo for six weeks, or the reverse sequence. At weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 11, 13, and 15, each subject was assessed using the EDI, SCL-90, POMS and binge records. Plasma desipramine levels were obtained at weeks 4 and 13. Twenty-four subjects completed the entire fifteen week protocol, while 23 dropped out. Desipramine was significantly more effective than placebo in reducing the frequency of weekly binding, weekly vomiting, and the fatigue scale of the POMS. No significant effect of the drug was obtained on the EDI or the SCL-90. The clinical effect was modest. Desipramine's antibulimic effects were not associated with an alleviation of depressive symptoms.     

Major adverse reactions during desipramine treatment: relationship to plasma drug concentrations, concomitant antipsychotic treatment, and patient characteristics

Major adverse reactions interrupting drug therapy during treatment of 84 patients with desipramine hydrochloride were studied to determine their relationship to desipramine plasma concentrations and other clinical variables. The frequency of adverse reactions was higher in patients over 60 years old (39%), and in patients also receiving antipsychotic medications (32%), but low in patients under 60 years old (7%). Desipramine plasma concentrations in patients having side effects did not differ significantly from those in patients without side effects. Steady state desipramine plasma concentrations did not increase with age. Symptomatic orthostatic hypotension, the most common side effect encountered, occurred early in treatment at low desipramine plasma concentrations. Other side effects, usually described as anticholinergic, occurred exclusively in the 34 patients receiving both desipramine and antipsychotic drugs. The concentration of 2-hydroxy-desipramine, the total concentration of 2-hydroxy-desipramine and desipramine, and the ratio of 2-hydroxy-desipramine to desipramine were not higher in 11 patients having side effects than in a comparison group without side effects.     

Six-month trial of bupropion with contingency management for cocaine dependence in a methadone-maintained population

CONTEXT: No effective pharmacotherapies exist for cocaine dependence, although contingency management (CM) has demonstrated efficacy. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of bupropion hydrochloride and CM for reducing cocaine use in methadone hydrochloride-maintained individuals. DESIGN: This 25-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial randomly assigned participants to 1 of 4 treatment conditions: CM and placebo (CMP), CM and 300 mg/d of bupropion hydrochloride (CMB), voucher control and placebo (VCP), or voucher control and bupropion (VCB). SETTING: Outpatient clinic at the Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 106 opiate-dependent, cocaine-abusing individuals. INTERVENTIONS: All study participants received methadone hydrochloride (range, 60-120 mg). Participants receiving bupropion hydrochloride were given 300 mg/d beginning at week 3. In the CM conditions, each urine sample negative for both opioids and cocaine resulted in a monetary-based voucher that increased for consecutively drug-free urine samples during weeks 1 to 13. Completion of abstinence-related activities also resulted in a voucher. During weeks 14 to 25, only completion of activities was reinforced in the CM group, regardless of sample results. The voucher control groups received vouchers for submitting urine samples, regardless of results, throughout the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Thrice-weekly urine toxicologic test results for cocaine and heroin. RESULTS: Groups did not differ in baseline characteristics or retention rates. Opiate use decreased significantly, with all treatment groups attaining equivalent amounts of opiate use at the end of the study. In the CMB group, the proportion of cocaine-positive samples significantly decreased during weeks 3 to 13 (P<.001) relative to week 3 and remained low during weeks 14 to 25. In the CMP group, cocaine use significantly increased during weeks 3 to 13 (P<.001) relative to week 3, but then cocaine use significantly decreased relative to the initial slope during weeks 14 to 25 (P<.001). In contrast, by treatment end, the VCB and VCP groups showed no significant improvement in cocaine use. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that combining CM with bupropion for the treatment of cocaine addiction may significantly improve outcomes relative to bupropion alone.     

A preliminary study of desipramine in the treatment of cocaine abuse in methadone maintenance patients

Intravenous cocaine use is a major problem in methadone maintenance programs. In this pilot study of 16 cocaine-abusing methadone maintenance patients, 8 received desipramine and 8 received no medication other than methadone. During an 8-week open trial the desipramine patients reported significantly less cocaine craving and had less cocaine use than the other patients.     

Withdrawal from long-term high-dose desipramine therapy. Clinical and biological changes.

Investigation was undertaken on a patient whose long-term intake of desipramine hydrochloride was amongst the highest reported. Desipramine treatment instituted at a daily dosage of 75 mg for depressive equivalents of head, chest, and abdominal pain was increased to 1,000 mg daily over a 12-year interval with minimal side effects. Plasma desipramine level dropped immediately on withdrawal, and urinary metabolite values dropped over the subsequent five days. The electrocardiographic abnormalities of first-degree atrioventricular block and incomplete left bundle branch block rapidly disappeared on cessation of medication. Electroencephalographic changes with symmetrical generalized irregular 5- to 7-cps theta activity and 18- to 28-cps beta activity also improved. Longitudinal polygraphic sleep studies showed prolonged rapid eye movement rebound and increased delta sleep coincident with withdrawal. It took ten days after cessation of desipramine for urinary 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol concentration to increase substantially. Although catecholamines are involved in growth hormone (GH) and cortisol regulation, no abnormalities were found in GH or cortisol levels.     

Disulfiram versus placebo for cocaine dependence in buprenorphine-maintained subjects: a preliminary trial.

BACKGROUND: We examined the effects of disulfiram versus placebo on cocaine dependence in buprenorphine-maintained subjects. METHODS: Opioid and cocaine dependent subjects (n = 20) were induced onto buprenorphine maintenance, then randomized to disulfiram (250 mg q.d. ; n = 11) or placebo (n = 9) treatment for 12 weeks. RESULTS: Groups were comparable at baseline on demographic measures and on baseline measures of drug-use severity. Fifteen subjects completed the study, including 8 subjects randomized to disulfiram (72.7%) and 7 subjects randomized to placebo (77.8%). The total number of weeks abstinent from cocaine was significantly greater on disulfiram versus placebo (mean +/- SD: 7.8 +/- 2.6 vs. 3.3 +/- 0.5, p <.05) and the number of days to achieving 3 weeks (24.6 +/- 15.1 vs. 57.8 +/- 7.7, p <.01) of continuous cocaine abstinence was significantly lower in disulfiram compared with placebo. The number of cocaine-negative urine tests during the trial were also higher on disulfiram (14.7) than on placebo (8.6); furthermore, subjects in the disulfiram group achieved consistently higher rates of cocaine-negative urine tests in each 3-week interval and the increase over time was faster in the disulfiram compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study suggests the potential efficacy of disulfiram versus placebo for treatment of cocaine dependence in buprenorphine-maintained patients.     

Sex-related differences in nortriptyline-induced side-effects among depressed patients.

1. Men and women may differ in their pharmacokinetic responses to tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), in a number of autonomic indices, and in various adrenergic receptor mediated responses. Emerging evidence also suggests that women may have a lower rate of serotonin synthesis in brain and a greater sensitivity to the depressant effects of tryptophan depletion, relative to men. However, sex-related differences in TCA-induced side-effects, including increases in heart rate (HR), dry mouth, constipation, and difficulty urinating, has not been systematically investigated. 2. The authors examined potential sex-related differences in the pattern of side-effects during treatment with nortriptyline (NT), a TCA that is still widely used. Seventy-eight healthy outpatients who met Research Diagnostic Criteria and DSM-III-R criteria for major depression participated in a double-blind, randomized parallel trial of NT versus placebo. 3. Each subject was acutely challenged with either placebo or 50 mg NT prior to and after a 6-week treatment with NT. NT doses were adjusted weekly to maintain therapeutic plasma levels. Patients were assessed at multiple time points to detect the presence of NT-induced side-effects. 4. The initial, single (50 mg) dose of NT significantly increased supine HR. Six-week treatment with NT was found to significantly increase supine and sitting HRs, irrespective of sex. In rechallenge with the single NT dose, there were no significant effects on HR. 5. When sex-related differences were examined, HR increases were greater in men than women during weeks 4 through 6 of the NT treatment, although no sex-related differences were present in plasma NT levels or metabolites. In addition, there was a significant NT to placebo difference in self-rated dry mouth for women during all 6-weeks of treatment, whereas men showed a significant NT-placebo difference during weeks 3 and 5. 6. The results suggest the presence of sex-related differences in elevated supine HR response during the course of 6-week NT treatment. Depressed men may be more susceptible to NT-induced increases in supine HR than women.