MR扩散加权成像评估椎体骨量状况的初步研究

目的 探讨椎体MR扩散加权成像(DWI)测量值与双能X线(DXA)、定量GT(QCT)所测骨密度的相关性.方法 152例女性志愿者分别进行以下检查:胸腰椎侧位(T4～L4)X线平片,并采用Genant半定量法对其进行评阅;腰椎(L2～L4)DXA和QCT骨密度测量;腰椎常规行MR矢状面T2 WI、T1 WI和横断面T2 WI扫描;MR常规扫描结束后采用单次激发自旋回波平面回波扩散加权序列(SS-SE-EPI DWI)[扩散敏感因子(b)=500 s/mm2]进行L2～L4椎体横断面DWI扫描,并使用GE-Functool分析软件测量相应椎体表观扩散系数(ADC值).计量资料间的相关性采用Pearson相关分析.结果 随年龄增加,椎体ADC值呈逐步降低趋势.L2～L4椎体平均ADC值(0.241×10-3 mm2/s)与相应椎体平均骨密度DXA(I.038 s/cm2)、QCT(104.2 mg/cm3)具有相关性(r值分别为0.461、0.731,P值均＜0.01).结论 DWI可在常规2腰椎MRI基础上无创性评估椎体骨髓变化状况,进而来评估骨髓的变化对于骨量状况所带来的影响.     

Accuracy of lumbar spine bone mineral content by dual photon absorptiometry

The accuracy of measurement of the bone mineral content (BMC, g) and bone mineral density (BMD, g/cm2) of the lumbar spine by dual photon absorptiometry (DPA) was estimated by means of two different spine scanners (a Nuclear Data 2100 and a Lunar Radiation DP3). The lumbar spines of 13 cadavers were used. BMC and BMD were measured in situ and on the excised vertebrae in a solution of water/ethanol; and covered with ox muscle/porcine muscle/lard. The actual mineral weight and areal density were determined after chemical maceration, fat extraction, drying to a constant weight, ashing for 24 hr at 600 degrees C, and correction for the transverse processes. The true are was measured by parallax free X rays and planimetry. All measurements of BMC or BMD were highly interrelated (r = 0.94-0.99). The standard error of estimate (s.e.e.) of BMC in situ versus BMC in water/ethanol was 5.2%. The agreement between the BMD values of the two scanners was very good (s.e.e. = 2.9%). BMC in situ predicted the actual vertebral mineral mass with an s.e.e. of 8.1%. BMD in situ and BMD in water/ethanol predicted the actual area density with s.e.e.s of 10.3% and 5.0%, respectively. This study discloses the correlation and accuracy error of spinal DPA measurements in situ in whole cadavers versus the actual BMC and BMD. The error, which is underestimated in in vitro studies, amounts to 10%.     

Effect of Paget's disease of bone on areal lumbar spine bone mineral density measured by DXA, and density of cortical and trabecular bone measured by quantitative CT

Although bone density may be increased in bone that is affected by Paget's disease, density changes in cortical and trabecular bone and the effect on bone that is apparently unaffected by Paget's disease are relatively unexplored. We have investigated 81 vertebrae (28 affected, 53 unaffected) in 27 patients with Paget's disease, by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and by quantitative CT (QCT) bone density measurements of trabecular and cortical bone. DXA bone density was high (mean z-score = 1.62, p < 0.001) in vertebrae affected by Paget's disease, but not significantly different from normal in unaffected vertebrae (mean z-score = 0.07, ns). Mean QCT z-score in Paget's vertebrae was 2.07 (p = 0.009) for cortical bone and 1.37 (p = 0.008) for trabecular bone. DXA correlated with QCT cortical values in affected and unaffected bone (r = 0.8 and 0.56, respectively), and with QCT trabecular values (r = 0.72 and 0.48, respectively). There was no significant difference in the slopes for the correlations in affected or unaffected bone. Cortical QCT values are underestimated in Paget's disease compared with physical measurements of density, owing to the computer algorithm used. High DXA values may alert to the possibility of Paget's disease, especially if the value deviates from the expected normal sequence in lumbar vertebrae. Osteoporotic vertebrae may be overlooked if the average value of bone mineral density is taken in the lumbar spine without reviewing each vertebra.     

Accuracy of dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry of the lumbar spine: cadaver study

Dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry (DRA) was used to measure the bone mineral content and area density of lumbar vertebrae (L2-L3) in 11 cadavers. These data were subsequently compared with measured ash content and density. Excellent correlation was obtained between bone mineral content measured with DRA and ash weight (r = .963, P less than .0001). The accuracy error in determining mineral content in lumbar vertebrae with DRA was about 9%. In addition, strong correlation was observed between bone mineral density measured with DRA and ash density (r = .881, P less than .0001).     

Assessment of the bone mineral density in the lumbar vertebrae of newborns by quantitative computed tomography

 Objective. To assess the true mineral density (BMD, in g/cm³) of the lumbar spine in newborns. Design and patients. A post-mortem analysis of five infants with gestational ages ranging from 35 to 40 weeks, and birth weights from 2765 to 3200 g, was conducted using dual-energy quantitative computed tomography (QCT; Siemens Somatom DR). A 2 or 4 mm thick slice was obtained for each lumbar vertebra from L1 to L4. The density measured in these vertebrae was corrected by reference to a solid phantom (Osteo-CT) measured simultaneously. A three-dimensional image of the spine (Elscint CT Twin), as well as a photomicrograph of histological preparation from L2 vertebra, were also obtained in another term baby for comparison with the CT results. Results and conclusions. In the range of values studied, the vertebral densities were not dependent on birth weight. BMD values measured in L2, L3 and L4 were not significantly different, but were 10% lower than in L1 in four of five infants. The spatial resolution of the QCT protocol used (0.4 mm) did not permit the differentiation of trabecular and cortical bone, and the vertebral bodies appeared very homogeneous and dense, with a mean density value of 210±30 mg Ca/cm³, which is 2.5 times higher than the mean maximum value found in young normal adults. These preliminary results highlight the potential of QCT in neonatology. Special protocols will, however, need to be developed for in vivo measurements in this particular paediatric field.     

Comparative bone density measurements in healthy women and women with osteoporosis

To compare methods of noninvasive measurement of bone mineral content, 40 healthy early postmenopausal women and 68 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were studied. The methods included mono- and dual-energy quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA) of the lumbar spine, single-photon absorptiometry (SPA) of the distal third of the radius, and combined cortical thickness (CCT) of the second metacarpal shaft. Lateral thoracolumbar radiographic studies were performed and the spinal fracture index calculated. There was good correlation between QCT and DPA methods in early postmenopausal women and moderate correlation in postmenopausal osteoporotic women. Correlations between spinal measurements (QCT or DPA) and appendicular cortical measurements (SPA or CCT) were moderate in healthy women and poor in osteoporotic women. Measurements resulting from one method were not predictive of measurements obtained by another method for individual patients. The strongest correlation with severity of vertebral fracture was provided by QCT and the weakest by SPA. There was good correlation between single- and dual-energy QCT results. Osteoporotic women and younger healthy women can be distinguished by the measurement of spinal trabecular bone density using QCT, and this method is more sensitive than the measurement of spinal integral bone by DPA or of appendicular cortical bone by SPA or CCT.     

Determination of vertebral fracture threshold by measuring bone mineral content in the lumbar vertebrae]

Bone mineral density (BMD) in the lumbar vertebrae (L2-L4) was assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA: QDR-1000), and the values obtained were compared with the frequency of vertebral fracture as assessed by spinal X-ray photographs. Patients with spondylosis or scoliosis, which affect BMD values, were excluded from the study. An essentially linear correlation was observed between the frequency of vertebral fracture and lumbar BMD values: no vertebral fractures were observed in those whose BMD more than 0.8 g/cm2, whereas the frequency of fracture was 100% in patients whose BMD was less than 0.45 g/cm2. Thus, measurement of lumbar vertebrae by DEXA would be very useful in predicting vertebral fractures.     

Effect of bone distribution on vertebral strength: assessment with patient-specific nonlinear finite element analysis

Three-dimensional quantitative computed tomographic (QCT) studies of the lumbar spine were extended with finite element analysis (FEA) to include bone distribution in assessment of vertebral body strength. Fifty-nine FEA models were created from data from 43 patients, 28 with no evidence of osteoporosis and 15 with previous vertebral fractures. Simulated loads were applied to the vertebral models to estimate vertebral strength. Yield strength in the models from patients with osteoporosis was 0.22-1.05 MPa (average, 0.57 MPa +/- 0.26 [mean +/- standard deviation]), compared with 0.80-2.79 MPa (1.46 +/- 0.52, P less than .001) in patients with normal bone. Yield strength of vertebrae in patients with osteoporosis uniformly fell below approximately 1.0 MPa, with minimal overlap between patients with osteoporosis and those with normal bone compared with the overlap in bone mineral content and trabecular mineral density. Reproducibility of the FEA technique was 12.1% in a subgroup of patients with normal bone. A constant relationship between cortical and trabecular contributions was observed in patients with osteoporosis but not in control patients.     

Vertebral mineral determination by quantitative computed tomography (QCT): accuracy of single and dual energy measurements

Quantitative CT (QCT) studies of trabecular vertebral bone tissue have been carried out in vitro on a GE CT/T 9800 scanner. Results of both single energy (SE) 80 kVp and dual energy (DE) 80/140 kVp QCT data are compared with chemical mineral analysis to determine accuracy. We examined 62 vertebral specimens, from 28 cadavers (19 male and 9 female with an age range of 19-93 years, mean = 60.4). Averaging the results of all vertebral bodies of the same individual for SEQCT versus ashweight, we found a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.94 (p less than 0.0001), a standard error of the estimate (SEE) of 12.2 mg/cm3 (calibrated to K2HPO4), with a coefficient of variation (CV) of 13.2% and an average underestimation of bone mineral content of 18.7 mg/cm3. The corresponding DEQCT results were r = 0.98 (p less than 0.0001), SEE = 7.4 mg/cm3, CV = 7.0%, and an average underestimation of 4.9 mg/cm3. The SE and DE results are correlated with r = 0.98 (p less than 0.0001), SEE = 8.0 mg/cm3, and CV = 8.7%. From our SEQCT data and the results of the chemical analysis of bone mineral and fat content we calculated a fat sensitivity of 7.7 mg/cm3 K2HPO4 per 100 mg/cm3 fat change for our scanner. Using an average fat variability of 87.5 mg/cm3, this leads to a fat-related uncertainty for the normative SEQCT data of 6.7 mg/cm3, which is far lower than the normal biological variation of 29.4 mg/cm3. Using tabulated normative data on fat content versus age and versus mineral content of 188 vertebral specimens from five collaborating centers, we derived a correction algorithm for QCT measurement that reduces our average underestimation to 0.88 mg/cm3 with an SEE of 12.1 mg/cm3. Hence, this correction procedure can be used to estimate the fat corrected absolute mineral density for research purposes or for scanners with high fat sensitivity. For the GE CT/T 9800 scanner, with a relatively low fat to mineral sensitivity at 80 kVp, the correction procedure is generally not recommended for clinical studies since it minimizes the average fat induced error but does not reduce the residual, partially fat related uncertainty. Finally, since the fat related uncertainty is small compared to biological variation, the correlation is high between SEQCT and DEQCT, and the radiation dose is lower and the precision higher for SEQCT, we suggest that most clinical diagnostic studies using the GE CT/T 9800 scanner for bone mineral determination employ SEQCT at 80 kVp.     

Bone mineral content in early-postmenopausal and postmenopausal osteoporotic women: comparison of measurement methods

To investigate associations among methods for noninvasive measurement of skeletal bone mass, we studied 40 healthy early postmenopausal women and 68 older postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Methods included single- and dual-energy quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA) of the lumbar spine, single-photon absorptiometry (SPA) of the distal third of the radius, and combined cortical thickness (CCT) of the second metacarpal shaft. Lateral thoracolumbar radiography was performed, and a spinal fracture index was calculated. There was good correlation between QCT and DPA methods in early postmenopausal women and modest correlation in postmenopausal osteoporotic women. Correlations between spinal measurements (QCT or DPA) and appendicular cortical measurements (SPA or CCT) were modest in healthy women and poor in osteoporotic women. Measurements resulting from one method are not predictive of those by another method for the individual patient. The strongest correlation with severity of vertebral fracture is provided by QCT; the weakest, by SPA. There was a high correlation between single- and dual-energy QCT results, indicating that errors due to vertebral fat are not substantial in these postmenopausal women. Single-energy QCT may be adequate and perhaps preferable for assessing postmenopausal women. The measurement of spinal trabecular bone density by QCT discriminates between osteoporotic women and younger healthy women with more sensitivity than measurements of spinal integral bone by DPA or of appendicular cortical bone by SPA or CCT.     

Influence of anthropometric parameters and bone size on bone mineral density using volumetric quantitative computed tomography and dual X-ray absorptiometry at the hip

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of anthropometric parameters (age, height, and weight) and bone size on bone mineral density (BMD) using volumetric quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in a group of elderly women. MATERIAL AND METHODS: BMD values were obtained with DXA and QCT at the spine and hip in a cohort of 84 elderly women (mean age 73 +/- 6 years). QCT measures included trabecular, integral, and cortical BMD assessed at the hip and spine as well as cross-sectional areas of the mid-vertebrae and proximal femora. Spinal integral and femoral neck BMD measures were well matched to the regions of bone quantified on anteroposterior (AP) spine DXA and the femoral neck region of hip DXA. RESULTS: When QCT parameters were linearly regressed against body height and weight, only the relationships with weight were found to be statistically significant. Except for cortical BMD at the femoral neck, all BMD and geometric parameters measured from both DXA and QCT showed statistically significant associations with body weight (r2 = 0.4, 0.0001 < P < 0.02). The strongest associations with weight were found for DXA Neck (DXA_NECK) and DXA lumbar spine (DXA_LSP) (r2 = 0.4, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The relationship of DXA BMD is stronger than QCT BMD with body weight and it encompasses the response of both bone size and density to increasing body mass.     

Quantitative computed tomography in assessment of osteoporosis

Computed tomography (CT) has been widely investigated and applied in recent years as a means for noninvasive quantitative bone mineral determination. The usefulness of computed tomography for measurement of bone mineral lies in its ability to provide a quantitative image and, thereby, measure trabecular, cortical, or integral bone, centrally or peripherally. For measuring the spine, the potential advantages of quantitative computed tomography (QCT) over dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA) are its capability for precise three-dimensional anatomic localization providing a direct density measurement, and its capability for spatial separation of highly responsive cancellous bone from less responsive compact bone. Currently, QCT vertebral mineral determination has been implemented at over 800 sites encompassing a wide geographic distribution and a wide array of commercial scanners. With a world-wide distribution of approximately 8,000 advanced CT body scanners, the capability now exists for widespread application of vertebral bone mineral determination by quantitative computed tomography. These QCT techniques for vertebral mineral determination have been used to study skeletal changes in osteoporosis and other metabolic bone diseases. Longitudinal and cross-sectional bone mass measurements have been obtained at the University of California at San Francisco (UCSF) in over 3,000 patients seen clinically or on research protocols. The results presented here illustrate the use of QCT spinal mineral measurement in the delineation of normal age-related bone loss, in the evaluation of estrogen effects on bone, in the assessment of fracture threshold and risk, and in the study of the effects of various exercise regimens on bone mineral and the determination of relationships to other techniques of bone mineral measurement. The laboratory and clinical results presented herein indicate that QCT provides a reliable means to evaluate and monitor the many forms of osteoporosis and the various interventions aimed at ameliorating this condition. The greatest advantages of spinal QCT for noninvasive bone mineral measurement lie in the high precision of the technique, the high sensitivity of the vertebral trabecular measurement site, and the potential for widespread application.     

Quantitative computed tomography for spinal mineral assessment: current status

Quantitative CT (QCT) is an established method for the noninvasive assessment of bone mineral content in the vertebral spongiosum and other anatomic locations. The potential strengths of QCT relative to dual photon absorptiometry (DPA) are its capability for precise three-dimensional anatomic localization providing a direct density measurement and its capability for spatial separation of highly responsive cancellous bone from less responsive cortical bone. The extraction of this quantitative information from the CT image, however, requires sophisticated calibration and positioning techniques and careful technical monitoring.     

Bone mineral content and quantitative computerized tomography

Many methods are used to determine bone mineral content (BMC). Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) appears to be the most reliable method also because it allows the trabecular and the cortical bone to be measured separately. QCT is usually performed on the first four lumbar vertebral bodies. BMC is expressed in mg/ml and a mean value is calculated. Three hundred and fifteen subjects were studied (281 women and 34 men). The patients affected with Paget's disease or malignancies, with or without bone metastases, were not included in this study. The measurements were performed by means of a General Electric 9800 tomograph with software and calibration phantom (QCT-Bone program by Image Analysis). Fractured vertebrae were not included when calculating the mean value since an increased density is caused by fracture. The BMC of any studied vertebral body is considered in comparison with the BMC of the other lumbar vertebrae of the same subject. When the BMC of a given vertebral body exceeds the others by 25 mg/ml or more, nodules and/or stripes are observed during multiple-slice scanning of the bone. Lytic areas or angiomas are observed when the BMC of a given vertebral body is -25 mg/ml or higher. In calculating the mean vertebral BMC, vertebrae with both +25 and -25 must be excluded. In this way the method reliability increases.     

Measurement of lumbar spine bone mineral: a comparison of dual photon absorptiometry and computed tomography

A comparison of computed tomography (CT) and dual photon absorptiometry (DPA) in the measurement of spinal bone mineral was made in 44 subjects of whom 26 had vertebral crush fractures. Although CT measures only trabecular bone within the vertebral body whilst DPA measures the whole vertebral segment, a good correlation was observed (r = 0.80) when these quantities were expressed in dimensionally similar units. Trabecular bone in the distal radius measured by CT correlated less well with vertebral CT (r = 0.65). Cortical bone in the radius correlated poorly with the spinal DPA measurement (r = 0.38).     

Assessment of vertebral bone mineral density using volumetric quantitative CT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to determine the precision and diagnostic efficacy of bone mineral density (BMD) measures based on volumetric quantitative CT (QCT) of the spine. METHOD: Volumetric CT scans of L1 and L2 (GE-9800Q; 80 kVp, 140 mAs, 3 mm slices) were acquired in a cohort of 62 osteoporotic women (mean age 70.4 years, T(DXA hip or spine) < -2.5), of whom 20 had vertebral fractures and 42 were nonfractured control subjects. An image analysis technique delineated trabecular, cortical, and integral regions in reference to a vertebra-fixed coordinate system. We computed precision values and fracture control differences for these new regions and for single-slice QCT and dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measures synthesized from the volumetric data. RESULTS: Volumetric trabecular BMD showed higher precision (1.3%) than the synthesized single-slice measures (2.1-2.8%). Volumetric and single-slice trabecular BMD showed equivalent decrements between fractured and nonfractured subjects (17-19%), with integral BMD showing smaller and less significant differences (7-8%). CONCLUSION: Volumetric and single-slice QCT techniques are equivalent for vertebral fracture risk estimation, but volumetric techniques should be superior for monitoring therapy efficacy.     

中老年人群肝脏脂肪含量与骨密度的相关性研究

目的探讨中老年人群肝脏脂肪含量与腰椎骨密度的相关性。方法2016年3月至6月纳入184名北京社区中老年居民,其中男68名、女116名,对其进行腹部MRI mDIXON-Quant序列扫描和腰椎定量CT(QCT)扫描,测量肝脏脂肪含量和腰1~腰3椎体骨密度。根据肝脏脂肪含量的四分位数分为四组,采用单因素方差分析比较不同肝脏脂肪含量组间骨密度及身高、体重、体质量指数(BMI)、腰围、臀围等变量的差异,并对肝脏脂肪含量和骨密度做Spearman相关性分析和偏相关分析。结果随着肝脏脂肪含量的升高,BMI、腰围呈上升趋势,而腰椎骨密度逐渐降低。肝脏脂肪含量与腰椎骨密度呈低度负相关(r=-0.203,P=0.003),校正年龄、体重之后,仍呈负相关(r=-0.291,P<0.001),男性中r=-0.283(P=0.021),女性r=-0.210(P=0.025)。结论中老年人群肝脏脂肪含量与腰椎骨密度呈低度负相关。     

Bone mineral density of the lumbar spine by dual photon absorptiometry: age-related regression in normal Japanese subjects and fracture threshold in osteoporotics

The bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine was determined by DPA in 280 normal Japanese volunteers and 11 osteoporotic women with compression fractures. In women, bone loss started from the mid thirties and accelerated after the age of 50 years at the rate of 0.75% (0.0074 g/cm2) per year. In men, bone loss started from the mid twenties and occurred linearly at the rate of 0.30% (0.0032 g/cm2). The overall diminutions in vertebral BMD throughout life in men and women were 13.0% and 24.3%, respectively. The mean vertebral BMD of the osteoporotic women with recent compression fractures was 37.5% lower than that of age-matched controls. The 90th percentile for vertebral BMD in this group was 0.584 g/cm2. By the age of 80 years, approximately one-fifth of normal Japanese women have BMD values less than this.     

双能CT能谱曲线及骨钙CT值对骨质疏松的诊断价值

目的探讨双能CT能谱曲线及骨钙CT值对腰椎骨质疏松的诊断价值。资料与方法纳入84例疑似骨质疏松患者行腰椎(L3、L4)双能CT扫描及双能骨密度检查,并经双能CT图像后处理获得能谱曲线斜率及骨钙CT值。根据双能X线骨密度仪(DXA)测量腰椎T值,并分为非骨质疏松组58例和骨质疏松组26例。比较两组能谱曲线斜率和骨钙CT值的差异,分析能谱曲线斜率和骨钙CT值与DXA参数间的相关性。结果骨质疏松组患者骨钙CT值小于非骨质疏松组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);两组患者椎体能谱曲线斜率差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。L3能谱曲线斜率与DXA椎体T值、骨密度均呈显著正相关(r=0.59、0.59,P<0.01);L4能谱曲线斜率与DXA椎体T值、骨密度均呈显著正相关(r=0.62、0.63,P<0.01);L3骨钙CT值与DXA椎体T值、骨密度亦均呈显著正相关(r=0.61、0.61,P<0.01);L4骨钙CT值与DXA椎体T值、骨密度亦均呈显著正相关(r=0.57、0.57,P<0.01)。结论双能CT能谱曲线斜率及骨钙CT值可较好地反映腰椎骨密度情况,为骨质疏松的诊断及治疗效果评估提供参考。     

Quantitative computed tomography

Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) is an established technique for measuring bone mineral density (BMD) in the axial spine and peripheral skeleton (forearm, tibia). QCT can determine in three dimensions the true volumetric density (mg/cm 3) of trabecular or cortical bone at any skeletal site. However, because of the high responsiveness of spinal trabecular bone and its importance for vertebral strength, QCT has been principally employed to determine trabecular BMD in the vertebral body. QCT has been used for assessment of vertebral fracture risk, measurement of age-related bone loss, and follow-up of osteoporosis and other metabolic bone diseases. This article reviews the current capabilities of QCT at different skeletal sites and the recent technical developments, including volumetric acquisition.