Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopic astigmatism with the Nidek EC-5000 laser

PURPOSE: We studied the efficacy, predictability, and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for moderate to high simple and compound myopic astigmatism. METHODS: Ninety-two eyes of 46 consecutive patients who had LASIK for myopic astigmatism (64 eyes, astigmatism 3.00 to 9.00 D; myopia 0 to -20.00 D), or simple myopia (28 eyes, myopia -4.00 to -20.00 D; astigmatism 0 to 0.50 D) were retrospectively studied. Mean baseline spherical equivalent refraction (SE) in the myopia group was -8.11 +/- 3.94 D and in the astigmatism group, -8.55 +/- 4.49 D. All eyes underwent LASIK using the Nidek EC-5000 laser by the same surgeon. RESULTS: At 6 months after LASIK in the myopia group versus the astigmatism group, 24 eyes (85%) vs. 54 eyes (84%) were available for follow-up, 12 eyes (50%) vs. 13 eyes (24%) had uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/20, 19 eyes (79%) vs. 44 eyes (81%) had UCVA of 20/40, 8 eyes (33%) vs. 18 eyes (33%) had SE within +/- 0.50 D, 15 eyes (62%) vs. 39 eyes (72%) had SE within +/- 1.00 D, and mean SE was -1.22 +/- 1.17 D vs. -0.74 +/- 1.46 D. Mean astigmatism (vertexed to the corneal plane) in the astigmatism group was 2.77 D at 0 degrees before surgery and 0.32 D at 7 degrees at 6 months. None of the myopic eyes and three of the astigmatic eyes (5%) lost > or = 2 lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity. CONCLUSION: LASIK with the Nidek EC-5000 laser for myopic astigmatism was reasonably effective, predictable, and safe. Astigmatism was under-corrected with the nomogram implemented in this study.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism with the Nidek EC-5000 Excimer laser.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy, predictability, stability, and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed for 92 eyes of 62 consecutive patients to evaluate uncorrected (UCVA) and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) and manifest refraction before and 3 and 6 months after LASIK (Moria LSK-ONE microkeratome, Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser). Eyes were divided into groups: Group 1 (low hyperopia) for spherical correction of +1.00 to +3.00 D (22 eyes), Group 2 (low hyperopic astigmatism) for toric correction with spherical equivalent refraction of +1.00 to +3.00 D (18 eyes), Group 3 (moderate hyperopia) for spherical correction of +3.25 to +6.00 D (10 eyes), and Group 4 (moderate hyperopic astigmatism) for toric correction with spherical equivalent refraction between +3.25 and +6.00 D (18 eyes). RESULTS: At 3 and 6 months after LASIK, 68 eyes (73.9%) were available for follow-up examination. Percentage of eyes with a spherical equivalent refraction within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia for Group 1 was 54.5% (12 eyes); Group 2, 50% (9 eyes); Group 3, 40% (4 eyes), and Group 4, 38.8% (7 eyes). UCVA > or =20/20 in Group 1 was 14% and in Groups 2, 3, and 4, 0%. One eye (5.5%) lost two lines of BSCVA. CONCLUSION: LASIK with the Moria LSK-ONE microkeratome and the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser reduced low and moderate hyperopia and was within +/-0.50 D of target outcome in approximately 50% of eyes. Undercorrection was evident in all groups. The procedure was safe.     

Hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis with the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and predictability of hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis (H-LASIK) using modified software. DESIGN: Retrospective, noncomparative case series. PARTICIPANTS: The first 72 consecutive eyes of 44 patients with up to +5.00 diopters (D) hyperopia. INTERVENTION: Hyperopic LASIK using the Automatic Corneal Shaper (ACS; Chiron Vision, Claremont, CA) and the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser (Nidek, Tokyo, Japan). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Uncorrected visual acuity, manifest spherical equivalent (MSE), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and complications were studied. RESULTS: At 6 months, in the low hyperopia group (<3.00 D), mean MSE was +0.30 +/- 0.71 D, with 88.9% eyes within 1 D of emmetropia compared with +1.09 +/- 0.92 D and 51.8% within 1 D of emmetropia in the moderate hyperopia group (> or =3.00 D; P = 0.003). Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 43 of 45 eyes (95.6%) and in 21 of 27 (77.8%) eyes in the low and moderate hyperopia groups, respectively. Only one eye (1.4%) from the moderate hyperopia group lost two lines of BCVA. Eighteen eyes (25%) required retreatment to correct residual hyperopia, 9 eyes (20.0%) in the low hyperopia group and 9 eyes (33.3%) in the moderate hyperopia group. Retreatments resulted in an MSE of +0.02 +/- 0.45 D and +0.04 +/- 0.73 D in the low and moderate hyperopia groups, respectively. No flap-related complications were seen. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperopic LASIK with the ACS and the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser using our modified software is a safe, effective, and predictable procedure for low hyperopia. Results are satisfactory up to moderate hyperopia. Significant regression can occur for low and moderate hyperopia. Retreatment can be performed safely and effectively to improve the visual and refractive results.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis using the Nidek EC-5000 or the Alcon LADARVision 4000 systems

PURPOSE: To compare the refractive results of eyes with low to moderate myopia that underwent laser in situ keratomileusis with either the Nidek EC-5000 or the Alcon LADARVision 4000 excimer laser systems. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 114 LASIK procedures with either the Nidek EC-5000 (54 eyes) or the Alcon LADARVision 4000 (60 eyes) excimer laser systems. Preoperative refractive errors were similar and both populations were treated during the same time period. Data analyzed included uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), spherical magnitude, spherical equivalent refraction, astigmatism power, astigmatism axis, and vector astigmatism change. RESULTS: Results at 6 months were analyzed. Spherical correction change was a mean -3.95 D for Nidek treated eyes and a mean -4.53 D for LADARVision treated eyes (P = .20). Mean spherical equivalent refraction change was -3.70 D for Nidek eyes and -4.20 D for LADARVision eyes (P = .23). Mean change in UCVA (LogMAR) was 1.05 for Nidek eyes and 0.99 for LADARVision eyes (P = .40). Mean astigmatism magnitude change was 0.71 D for Nidek eyes and 0.77 D for LADARVision eyes (P = .63). Mean vector-corrected astigmatism change was 0.93 D for Nidek eyes and 1.00 D for LADARVision eyes (P = .63). Mean vector-corrected astigmatism axis for Nidek eyes was 3.08 D and for LADARVision eyes 6.58 D (P = .70). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in refractive results in eyes treated with the Alcon LADARVision 4000 or the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser systems. Inherent differences between the two laser systems are highlighted.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for spherical hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism using the NIDEK EC-5000 excimer laser

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy, predictability, and safety of LASIK for the surgical correction of low to moderate hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism using the NIDEK EC-5000 excimer laser. METHODS: In a multicenter United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulated study of LASIK, 7 centers enrolled 293 eyes with manifest refraction sphere that ranged from +0.50 to +6.00 diopters (D) with or without astigmatism up to 3.00 D. The intended outcome was plano in all eyes. Patients were treated bilaterally. One year postoperative outcomes are reported. RESULTS: The mean spherical equivalent refraction (MRSE) for all eyes changed from +2.61 +/- 1.19 D (range: +0.50 to +6.63 D) preoperatively to +0.35 +/- 0.54 D (range: -1.63 to +2.00 D) 1 year postoperatively. Overall, 61% (170/279) of eyes achieved distance uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/20 or better, 82% (228/279) of eyes saw 20/25 or better, and 99% (277/279) of eyes saw 20/40 or better. Refractive accuracy was demonstrated as 63.1% (176/279) of eyes achieved a MRSE within +/- 0.50 D and 90.3% (252/279) of eyes within +/- 1.00 D. Less than 2% (4/279) of eyes lost 2 lines of distance best spectacle-corrected visual acuity. Stability of refraction was demonstrated by 6 months, with a mean hyperopic shift of < 0.03 D from 3 to 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: The NIDEK EC-5000 corrected hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism with UCVA, refractive accuracy, 1-year stability, and safety that surpassed all FDA criteria.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopic astigmatism

PURPOSE: To evaluate the refractive results of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopic astigmatic eyes, and to assess the efficacy, accuracy, stability, and safety of the procedure. METHODS: LASIK was performed on 113 eyes of 73 patients for correction of myopic astigmatism ranging from 1.00 to 5.00 D, as measured by manifest refraction, with a mean baseline refractive astigmatism of 2.09 +/- 1.12 D. The Chiron Automated Corneal Shaper was used to create a corneal flap, and laser ablation was performed using the Chiron-Technolas Keracor 116 excimer laser. Follow-up time was 12 months for all eyes. RESULTS: Refractive astigmatism was stable by 3 months after surgery. At 1 year after LASIK, refractive astigmatism was reduced to a mean of 0.25 +/- 0.31 D (range 0 to 1.00 D). Sixty-one eyes (54%) had no residual astigmatism and 98 eyes (86.7%) had 0 to 0.50 D of refractive astigmatism. The mean percent reduction of preoperative astigmatism was 87.9 +/- 14.9%. The mean axis deviation of the surgically induced astigmatism was 2.1 +/- 3.1 degrees, with 96 eyes (84.9%) within 5 degrees of the desired axis. The percent correction of preoperative astigmatism in the proper axis was 97.1 +/- 15.5%. Spectacle-corrected visual acuity improved by 2 lines in 11 eyes (9.7%), and was reduced by 1 line only in 1 eye. There were no other significant complications. CONCLUSION: LASIK with the Chiron-Technolas Keracor 116 excimer laser was effective for correction of myopic astigmatism, with good stability after 3 months. The results were predictable with an acceptable degree of accuracy. LASIK is a safe procedure with very few complications.     

Bitoric laser in situ keratomileusis for the correction of simple myopic and mixed astigmatism

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of bitoric laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for the correction of simple myopic and mixed astigmatism. DESIGN: Retrospective, single-center, and noncomparative case series. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-six eyes of 56 patients were analyzed for this study. Six-month and 1-year follow-up data were available on 86 eyes and 72 eyes, respectively. Eyes were divided in two groups according to the type of astigmatism: myopic astigmatism with low sphere (< -2 diopters) and mixed astigmatism. The range of astigmatism was 1.25 to 7.5 diopters. INTERVENTION: LASIK was performed using the Automated Corneal Shaper (ACS) microkeratome (Bausch & Lomb, Claremont, CA) to create a cornea flap using the 130- or 160-micron thickness plate. A bitoric mid-stromal ablation was performed using the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser (Nidek Company, Gamagori, Japan). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Uncorrected visual acuity, manifest refraction, and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity were the parameters measured preoperatively and at months 1, 3, 6, and 12. RESULTS: At the last visit, an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better was achieved in 77% and 68% of the myopic and mixed astigmatism groups, respectively. Ninety-two percent of all eyes had a mean spherical equivalent within +/- 0.50 diopter of emmetropia. A mean decrease in the vectorial magnitude of the astigmatism of 94% and 91% was achieved for those eyes with myopic and mixed astigmatism, respectively. There was no loss of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity. In two eyes, the axis of the positive cylinder was misaligned. CONCLUSION: Bitoric LASIK is an effective procedure to correct myopic and mixed astigmatism. Eighty-five percent of the eyes achieved an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/25 or better and had a final cylinder of 0.5 diopter or less. It is a safe operation, because no eyes lost any lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity. Longer follow-up may be needed to assess these results.     

准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗混合性散光

目的:研究准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗混合性散光的安全性和有效性。方法:采用Technolas217-Z准分子激光机,对9例(11眼)混合性散光患者进行手术,并随访0.5a以上,观察手术前后视力、屈光度、散光及散光轴的变化。结果:术后6mo裸眼视力10眼(91%)均等于或超过术前最佳矫正视力,术后球镜屈光度在±0.75D以内,残余散光度平均为–0.77±0.13D,散光轴向平均较术前偏斜3.15°±1.3°。结论:准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗混合性散光安全、有效。     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, predictability, and surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. METHODS: This retrospective study comprised 69 eyes that had LASIK to correct myopia and 74 eyes that had LASIK to correct myopic astigmatism. The excimer laser keratectomy was performed using a Summit Apex Plus machine. Refraction, visual acuity, and computerized corneal videokeratography data from the preoperative and postoperative examinations were collected. The astigmatic change was calculated by the Alpins vector analysis method. RESULTS: The preoperative spherical equivalent at the glasses plane in the myopia and myopic astigmatism groups was -8.08 diopters (D) and -9.73 D, respectively. At 6 months, the spherical equivalent and residual corneal astigmatism were -0.25 D and 0.85 D, respectively, in the myopia group and -0.71 D and 0.82 D, respectively, in the myopic astigmatism group. In the myopia group, 88% of eyes were within +/-1.0 D of the intended myopia correction and in the myopic astigmatism group, 85% were within +/-1.0 D of the targeted spherical equivalent and 90% were within +/-1.0 D of the intended astigmatism correction. The uncorrected visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 94.1% of eyes in the myopia group and 92.5% of eyes in the myopic astigmatism group. The SIA magnitude was 0.66 D with the axis randomly distributed in the myopia group. The mean astigmatism correction index was 0.97, the mean magnitude of error was 0.13 D +/- 0.62 (SD), and the mean angle of error was -3.70 +/- 13.73 degrees in the myopic astigmatism group. CONCLUSION: Laser in situ keratomileusis had similar predictability, safety, and efficacy in the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism. The astigmatism correction was effective, but the results suggest that subjective astigmatism of less than 1.0 D need not be treated with the Summit Apex Plus laser.     

Effect of expanding the treatment zone of the Nidek EC-5000 laser on laser in situ keratomileusis outcomes

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of expanding the treatment zone of the Nidek EC-5000 laser on postoperative visual acuity as well as night glare and halos after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using 4 ablation zone diameters. SETTING: Division of Ophthalmology, Evanston Northwestern Healthcare and Northwestern University Medical School, Glenview, Illinois, USA. METHODS: This prospective study comprised 301 eyes of 154 consecutive patients who had LASIK in 1 or both eyes using the Nidek EC-5000 laser by 1 surgeon with experience in keratomileusis and excimer laser refractive surgery. A 6.5 mm optical zone was used with a transition zone 1.0 mm larger than the pupil under scotopic conditions (7.5, 8.0, 8.5, or 9.0 mm). Targeted correction was calculated according to a customized clinical nomogram. All patients were queried about glare and halos preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively using a questionnaire assigning numeric values to the degree of perceived visual disturbance (0 = no glare or halos, 1 = minimal, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). RESULTS: The baseline uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 20/200 or worse in 293 eyes. The baseline best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was 20/20 or better. The mean preoperative refractive sphere was -6.33 diopters (D) +/- 2.80 (SD) (range -1.00 to -16.25 D) and the mean preoperative refractive cylinder, 0.86 +/- 0.83 D (range 0 to +3.25 D). Three months postoperatively, 78% of eyes had a UCVA of 20/20 and 99%, of 20/40 or better. Preoperatively, 94 eyes (31%) had glare and halos. At 3 months, glare, halos, or both were present in 19 eyes of 11 patients (6.3%) (P<.0001); in 14 eyes, patients reported less severe glare and halos postoperatively than preoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a peripheral transition zone 1.0 mm larger than the pupil under scotopic conditions resulted in a low incidence of glare and halos postoperatively and did not adversely affect visual acuity. There was no increase in postoperative complications including corneal ectasia.     

Geometric customization of optical and transition zone parameters for treatment of compound myopic astigmatism with the NIDEK EC-5000 excimer laser

PURPOSE: To compare the refractive outcome of two ablation zone designs using LASIK for the correction of compound myopic astigmatism. METHODS: This retrospective study compared refractive outcomes in two groups of patients undergoing LASIK. In the circular treatment group, 45 eyes were corrected with circular optical and transition zones of 6 mm and 6.5 mm, respectively. In the customized treatment group, 45 eyes were corrected with optical and transition zones enlarged along the flat axis to 6.5 mm and 7.5 mm, respectively. P values <.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -5.36+/-2.02 diopters (D) and -5.36+/- 2.13 D for the circular and customized treatment groups, respectively. Mean postoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -0.09+/-0.74 D and -0.11+/-0.42 D for the circular and customized treatment groups, respectively. Mean cylinder was 0.49+/-0.39 D and 0.22+/-0.43 D for the circular and customized treatment groups, respectively (P<.001). Postoperative blur strength index was 0.68+/-0.44 D and 0.39+/-0.27 D in the circular and customized treatment groups, respectively (P<.001). Uncorrected visual acuity was significantly better in the customized treatment group compared with the circular treatment group (P<.05). The gain in lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was significantly greater in the customized treatment group compared with the circular treatment group (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: An elliptical ablation zone for treating compound myopic astigmatism results in better efficacy, safety, and lower tissue removal than a circular treatment zone. This may be due to the geometric optimization provided by the enlargement of the optical and transition zones along the flat meridian.     

Predictability and outcomes of photoastigmatic keratectomy using the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of astigmatic correction on the accuracy of the myopic and astigmatic correction in patients having photorefractive astigmatic keratectomy (PARK) and in those having photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). SETTING: Specialist excimer laser refractive clinic. METHODS: This prospective consecutive case series comprised 6097 eyes with a preoperative mean spherical equivalent (MSE) of -4.63 diopters (D) +/- 1.95 (SD) (range -0.75 to -13.00 D) and a mean cylinder of -1.13 +/- 0.73 D (range -0.50 to -6.00 D) having PARK with a Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser. Visual and refractive outcomes were assessed 12 months postoperatively and compared with those in 3004 eyes that had spherical PRK. RESULTS: At 12 months, the MSE was -0.02 +/- 0.79 D and the mean cylinder was -0.49 +/- 0.47 D in the PARK group; the MSE was -0.07 +/- 0.66 D in the PRK group. An MSE within +/-0.05 D of emmetropia was achieved by 69.8% and within +/-1.00 D, by 87.9%. The uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 20/20 or better in 42.6% and 20/40 or better in 91.2%. Statistical significance (P <.001, analysis of variance) was achieved for MSE, sphere, cylinder, haze, and visual acuity (best corrected [BCVA] and UCVA) based on the preoperative cylinder. The loss of BCVA varied from 1.1% to 5.8% depending on the degree of astigmatism treated. Accuracy varied with the attempted myopic correction and the attempted astigmatic correction. CONCLUSIONS: Excimer laser PARK was an effective treatment for compound myopic astigmatism, but predictability decreased and complications increased as the attempted astigmatic correction increased.     

Anterior corneal surface after Nidek EC-5000 multipass and multizone photorefractive keratectomy for myopia

PURPOSE: To evaluate the correlation between the presence of irregularities in corneal ablation and the number of ablation zones with multipass and multizone photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). METHODS: The differential maps obtained from corneal topography performed before and 1 month after PRK in 62 eyes that had undergone PRK with the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser were assessed for irregularities. PRK treatment ranged from -1.00 to -16.00 D (mean -5.25 +/- 2.72 D), and the number of zones ranged from one to five. RESULTS: Of 62 differential maps, 27 had an irregular pattern according to the Hersh classification, with a non-significant correlation with the number of treatment zones (chi2 = 5.09, P >.1). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that corneal topography irregularities arising from multizone PRK were not related to the amount of treatment or to the number of ablation zones.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for primary and secondary mixed astigmatism

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the efficacy, predictability, and safety of LASIK in the correction of primary and secondary mixed astigmatism after previous LASIK surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative case series. METHODS: The retrospective study included 118 eyes having LASIK with the LADARVison 4000 excimer laser (Alcon Surgical, Orlando, Florida) to correct mixed astigmatism. The eyes were divided into two groups: in group A (n = 64), LASIK was for primary mixed astigmatism and in group B (n = 54), LASIK was for secondary mixed astigmatism. Mean follow-up was 10.6 +/- 5.90 months. RESULTS: Overall, the postoperative UCVA was 20/20 in 51% of eyes and 20/40 or better in 97% of eyes at the last visit. The mean refractive cylinder was -2.18 +/- 0.94 D preoperatively and -0.56 +/- 0.56 D postoperatively. Sixty-one percent of eyes had a refractive cylinder of 0.50 D or less. One eye lost 2 lines of BSCVA (0.8%). None of the eyes had postoperative BSCVA worse than 20/25. The difference of preoperative cylinder was significant between group A and group B (P = .000). However, there was no statistical difference of postoperative refraction and UCVA between these two groups. At 12 months, the mean vector magnitude achieved was 93% of intended cylinder correction with a mean angle of error of -3.0 +/- 16 degrees. CONCLUSIONS: LASIK is a safe, effective, and predictable procedure to treat both primary and secondary mixed astigmatism. Nomogram adjustment with spherical and astigmatism components individually may improve refractive outcomes.     

LASIK治疗混合性散光的临床疗效

目的 :探讨LASIK治疗混合性散光的安全性和有效性。方法 :应用CHIRON公司Techolaskeracor 117c型准分子激光仪对 13人 (19眼 )混合性散光进行LASIK治疗。随访 6个月以上 ,观察手术前后的视力、屈光度、散光及散光轴的变化。结果 :术后随访 6个月裸眼视力≥术前矫正视力者占 89 47% ,屈光度在± 1 0D以内者占 84 2 1% ,残留散光平均为 0 49D ,散光矫正 84 66%。结论 :LASIK治疗混合性散光预测性好、安全可靠。     

Comparison of photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia of -6 D or less using the Nidek EC-5000 laser

PURPOSE: We compared the efficacy, predictability, and safety of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for the surgical correction of low and moderate myopia. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed to evaluate uncorrected and spectacle-corrected visual acuity, and manifest refraction 1 year after PRK or LASIK. All procedures were done using an automatic microkeratome (Chiron Ophthalmic) and the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser. RESULTS: PRK was performed in 75 eyes of 45 patients and LASIK in 133 eyes of 77 patients. Mean age for PRK patients was 32.8 years (range, 18 to 52 yr) and LASIK patients was 29.6 years (range, 18 to 49 yr). Mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction for PRK patients was -3.28 D (range, -1.00 to -6.00 D) and LASIK, -3.86 D (range, -1.00 to -6.00 D). One year after surgery, mean spherical equivalent refraction for Group 1 (baseline, -1.00 to -3.00 D) PRK eyes was -0.18 +/- 0.61 D (range, -1.50 to +0.75 D) and for LASIK eyes, -0.08 +/- 0.61 D (range, -1.50 to +1.62 D), with no statistically significant difference. For Group 2 eyes (baseline, -3.25 to -6.00 D), mean spherical equivalent refraction for PRK eyes was -0.44 +/- 0.87 D (range, -2.00 to +2.12 D) and for LASIK eyes, -0.09 +/- 0.83 D (range, -1.50 to +1.75 D), with no statistically significant difference. The antilogarithm of the mean UCVA (antilogUCVA) in Group 1 for PRK was 0.79 +/- 0.21 (20/25) and for LASIK was 0.87 +/- 0.19 (20/23), with no statistically significant difference. The antilogUCVA in Group 2 for PRK eyes was 0.70 +/- 0.24 (20/28) and for LASIK eyes was 0.83 +/- 0.18 (20/24), with a statistically significant difference (0.7 vs. 0.83, P < .005). The percentage of eyes with a postoperative UCVA >20/40 in Group 1 for PRK was 91.5% (38 eyes) and for LASIK was 95% (50 eyes) (no statistically significant difference), and in Group 2 for PRK eyes, it was 82% (27 eyes) and 97.5% (78 eyes) for LASIK (statistically significant difference, P < .05). CONCLUSION: PRK and LASIK with the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser are effective and safe for correcting low to moderate myopia, but LASIK eyes showed better results for moderate myopia in terms of uncorrected visual acuity.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis versus photorefractive keratectomy in the correction of myopic astigmatism

PURPOSE: To evaluate retrospectively the effectiveness of astigmatism correction in eyes treated with laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). METHODS: Patients with low to moderate myopia with astigmatism ranging from +0.25 to +4.50 diopters were included in the study. PRK was performed on 62 eyes and LASIK on 70 eyes. Six-month data were analyzed with regard to astigmatism power, astigmatism axis, spherical equivalent, uncorrected visual acuity, vector astigmatism change, and topographic corneal regularity. RESULTS: Mean astigmatism magnitude change was 0.54 +/- 0.76 in PRK-treated eyes and 0.60 +/- 0.67 in LASIK-treated eyes (61% versus 64% change, respectively, p = 0.61) at 6 months after surgery. Mean spherical correction change was -2.79 +/- 1.51 for PRK and -2.90 +/- 1.03 for LASIK (p = 0.63). Mean spherical equivalent change was -2.5 +/- 1.57 for PRK and -2.6 +/- 1.23 for LASIK (p = 0.73). Mean change in astigmatism axis was 20.8 +/- 73.1 for PRK and 33.8 +/- 81.7 for LASIK (p = 0.34). Mean change in uncorrected visual acuity (LogMar) was 0.84 +/- 0.26 for PRK and 0.89 +/- 0.23 for LASIK (p = 0.21). Mean vector-corrected astigmatism change was 0.88 +/- 0.66 for PRK and 0.95 +/- 0.59 for LASIK (p = 0.51). Mean vector-corrected astigmatism axis for PRK was 86.9 +/- 59 degrees and for LASIK 83.8 +/- -47.6 degrees (p = 0.75). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in astigmatism correction between PRK and LASIK at 6 months after surgery.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and compound myopic astigmatism using the Technolas 217 scanning-spot laser

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety, efficacy, predictability, and visual results of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using the Bausch & Lomb Technolas(R) 217 scanning-spot laser for the treatment of myopia and compound myopic astigmatism. SETTING: Stanford Eye Laser Center, Stanford, California, USA. METHODS: In a prospective study, 110 eyes of 58 patients with a mean spherical equivalent (SE) of -4.87 diopters (D) +/- 2.5 (SD) (range -1.0 to -11.4 D) had LASIK for myopia and compound myopic astigmatism using the Technolas 217 scanning-spot laser. The primary outcome variables included preoperative and postoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), achieved versus attempted correction, vector analysis of astigmatism, and complications. RESULTS: One hundred ten eyes were available for analysis at 3 months. The mean SE refraction was reduced 95% (mean -0.23 +/- 0.4 D), and astigmatism was reduced 70% (mean 0.28 +/- 0.3 D). One day postoperatively, 100% of eyes had a UCVA of 20/40 or better, 96% had 20/25 or better, 77% had 20/20 or better, and 39% had 20/15 or better. At the 3-month examination, 100% of eyes had a UCVA of 20/40 or better, 95% had 20/25 or better, 83% had 20/20 or better, and 48% had 20/15 or better. Ninety percent of eyes were within +/-0.5 D of emmetropia. No eye lost 2 or more lines of BSCVA. CONCLUSIONS: The Technolas 217 scanning-spot laser produced excellent postoperative UCVA and BSCVA. It was predictable, safe, and effective for the treatment of myopia and compound myopic astigmatism. Long-term follow-up is needed to assess the stability of the procedure.     

Bilateral comparison of conventional versus topographic-guided customized ablation for myopic LASIK with the NIDEK EC-5000

PURPOSE: To compare visual acuity and higher order aberrations before and after myopic LASIK using conventional versus customized ablation. METHODS: This prospective, randomized study included 54 myopic eyes in 27 patients who underwent bilateral LASIK using the NIDEK EC-5000 excimer laser system (NIDEK Technologies, Gamagori, Japan). Customized aspheric treatment zone (CATz) treatment was used in one eye (CATz group) and conventional ablation (conventional group) was used in the fellow eye. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and higher order aberrations (root-mean-square [RMS] in 4-mm and 6-mm zones) of both groups were observed with the NIDEK OPD-Scan aberrometer before and 3 months after LASIK. Preoperative mean refractive error was similar for both eyes of each patient (P>.05). RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were noted in preoperative higher order aberrations (RMS in 4-mm and 6-mm zones) between groups (P>.05). No statistically significant difference was noted between pre- and postoperative higher order aberrations in the CATz group (P>.05). However, a highly statistically significant increase in higher order aberrations was observed after conventional ablation (P<.001). There was a statistically significant higher increase of higher order aberrations after LASIK in the conventional group than the CATz group (P<.05). Postoperative UCVA with both conventional and customized ablation was not significantly different (P>.05). CONCLUSIONS: LASIK with conventional ablation and CATz ablation resulted in the same UCVA. The increase in higher order aberrations after CATz ablation was less than after conventional ablation.