Surgical wound healing complications in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with bevacizumab

BACKGROUND: Bevacizumab (Avastin; rhuMab VEGF), a humanized monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), significantly prolongs survival when added to intravenous 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment. Because antiangiogenic agents might inhibit wound healing, we assessed postoperative wound healing complications in two randomized trials of 5 mg/kg bevacizumab in CRC treatment. METHODS: We assessed the wound healing complications in patients who: (1) underwent cancer surgery 28-60 days before study treatment and (2) underwent major surgery during study treatment. Cases were reviewed for wound healing complications occurring < or = 60 days after surgery. RESULTS: With cancer surgery 28-60 days before study treatment, wound healing complications occurred in 3/230 (1.3%) bevacizumab-treated patients and 1/194 (0.5%) control patients. With major surgery during study treatment, 10/75 bevacizumab-treated patients (13%) and 1/29 control patients (3.4%) had wound healing complications. Bevacizumab-treated patients experienced complications with surgery < or = 30 and 31-60 days after the last dose. CONCLUSIONS: Bevacizumab administered in combination with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin-based chemotherapy 28-60 days after primary cancer surgery caused no increased risk of wound healing complications compared with chemotherapy alone. While wound healing complications were increased in patients who had major surgery during bevacizumab therapy, the majority of bevacizumab-treated patients experienced no complications.     

贝伐珠单抗联合双周方案一线治疗晚期大肠癌的疗效及与K-ras基因的关系

目的:探讨贝伐珠单抗（BEV）联合双周方案一线治疗晚期大肠癌的临床疗效及与K-ras基因的关系。方法:收集2008年1月至2014年2月解放军总医院收治、经病理确诊的46例K-ras基因状态明确的晚期大肠癌患者临床资料,其中K-ras野生型23例、K-ras突变型23例;回顾性分析了BEV联合FOLFIRI（20例）或FOLFOX（26例）方案在一线治疗晚期大肠癌中的疗效及毒副反应的情况,并分析K-ras基因突变与疗效的关系。结果:46例均可评价近期疗效,总ORR为39.1%,总DCR为91.3%,总中位PFS为7.5个月。以化疗方案分组,其中FOLFIRI+BEV组ORR为30.0%,DCR为95.0%,中位PFS为8.1个月;FOLFOX+BEV组ORR为46.2%,DCR为88.5%,中位PFS为6.5个月。以K-ras基因状态分组,K-ras突变组ORR为30.4%,DCR为91.3%,中位PFS为6.2个月;K-ras野生组ORR为47.8%,DCR为91.3%,中位PFS为9.9个月。以上差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论:虽然K-ras突变组在近期、远期疗效低于K-ras野生组,但在两组中均可见应用BEV能获益,同时再次证实K-ras基因突变是患者预后不良因素之一,但不是BEV应用的禁忌症;在化疗方案方面,BEV联合FOLFIRI或FOLFOX标准双周方案可提高化疗的ORR及DCR,且毒副反应小,安全性较好。     

Histopathologic evaluation of liver metastases from colorectal cancer in patients treated with FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab

Background:

The FOLFOXIRI regimen produces a high rate of radiological and histopathological responses. Bevacizumab added to chemotherapy showed an improvement in pathological response and necrosis of colorectal liver metastases (CLMs). FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab produced promising early clinical results and is under investigation in several randomised trials, although no data are currently available on its effects on response of CLMs and on liver toxicities.

Methods:

Starting from 499 patients enrolled in first-line phase II/III trials, we selected on the basis of tissue sample availability 18 patients treated with FOLFOXIRI/XELOXIRI and 24 patients treated with FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab who underwent secondary resection of CLMs. The 28 untreated patients who underwent primary resection of CLMs were included as control group. Responses of CLMs and chemotherapy-induced toxicities were assessed.

Results:

Among the patients, 63% of those treated with FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab, as compared with 28% of those treated with only FOLFOXIRI/XELOXIRI, showed a histopathological response (P=0.033). In the two groups, 52% and 12.5%, respectively, showed necrosis ⩾50% (P=0.017). The incidence of liver toxicities was not significantly increased in patients treated with FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab.

Conclusion:

The addition of bevacizumab to FOLFOXIRI produces high rates of pathologic responses and necrosis of CLM without increasing liver toxicity.     

Surgery with curative-intent in patients treated with first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer First BEAT and the randomised phase-III NO16966 trial

Background:

Complete resection of metastases can result in cure for selected patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Methods:

First BEAT evaluated the safety of bevacizumab with first-line chemotherapy in 1914 patients. Prospectively collected data from 225 patients who underwent curative-intent surgery were analysed, including an exploratory comparison of resection rate in patients treated with different regimens. NO16966 compared efficacy of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy plus bevacizumab or placebo in 1400 patients. A retrospective analysis of resection rate was undertaken.

Results:

In First BEAT, 225 out of 1914 patients (11.8%) underwent curative-intent surgery at median 64 days (range 42–100) after the last dose of bevacizumab. R0 resection was achieved in 173 out of 225 patients (76.9%). There were no surgery-related deaths and serious post-operative complications were uncommon, with grade 3/4 bleeding and wound-healing events reported in 0.4% and 1.8%, respectively. Resection rates were highest in patients receiving oxaliplatin-based combination chemotherapy (P=0.002), possibly confounded by patient selection. In NO16966, 44 out of 699 patients treated with bevacizumab (6.3%) and 34 out of 701 patients treated with placebo (4.9%) underwent R0 metastasectomy (P=0.24).

Conclusions:

The rate of serious post-operative complications in First BEAT was comparable to historical controls without bevacizumab. In NO16966, there were no statistically significant differences in resection rates or overall survival in patients treated with bevacizumab vs placebo.     

Occurence of RAS reversion in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with bevacizumab

Background: A disappearance of RAS mutations in the plasma of about 50% of mCRCs (metastatic colorectal cancers) treated with bevacizumab-based chemotherapy has been reported. Our aim was to evaluate the same issue at tissue level.Materials and Methods: Using next-generation sequencing and real-time PCR approaches, we characterized the primary tumor (PT) and paired liver metastases in 28 RAS mutant mCRCs. Patients were subdivided into 3 treatment groups: 1) bevacizumab plus chemotherapy; 2) chemotherapy alone; 3) any systemic therapy (control group). In groups 1 and 2, liver metastases were resected after removal of PT and subsequent neoadjuvant systemic therapy.Results: RAS mutant alleles are at the same percentage in PT and liver metastases in the control group, while a significant reduction of the level of RAS mutations was detected in 57.1% of cases in group 1 and in 8.3% of cases in group 2. Differences among groups are statistically significant (p = 0.038).Conclusions: Most of mCRC patients treated with bevacizumab-containing regimens experience a strong reduction of RAS mutant cells, suggesting bevacizumab as particularly active against RAS mutant cells. This finding might have potential therapeutic implications, as anti-EGFR could be reconsidered in primarily RAS mutant patients reverted to a wild-type status after bevacizumab exposure.     

Clinical observation of raltitrexed/bevacizumab combined with irinotecan or oxaliplation for advanced colorectal cancer简

Objective： The aim of the study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of raltitrexed/bevacizumab in combination with irinotecan or oxaliplation for advanced colorectal cancer as the second-line and second-line above treatments. Metho ods： Fifteen cases of advanced colorectal cancer were enrolled to receive regimens including raltitrexed/bevacizumab combined with irinotecan or oxaliplation. Two cases were treated with raltitrexed ＋ bavacizumab regimen, 9 cases with raltitrexed ＋ bavacizumab ＋ irinotecan regimen, and 4 cases with raltitrexed ＋ bevacizumab ＋ oxaliplation regimen. The doses of the drugs were as follows： bevacizumab 5 mg/kg ivgtt, d 1; raltitrexed 2.0 mg/m2 ivgtt 15 min, d2; irinotecan 180 mg/m2 ivgtt 1 h, d2; and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 ivgtt 2 h, d2. Two weeks was a cycle for each regimen. Results： The efficacy of the 15 patients could be evaluated. Two cases were in PR ,10 cases in SD, 3 cases in PD, the response rate was 13.3%, and the disease control rate was 80.0%. The median progress-free survival was 5.1 months （95% CI： 3.404-6.813 months）, and the median overall survival was 11.5 months （95% CI： 8.985-13.930 months）. The adverse effects included anorexia, nausea/vomiting, fatigue, leucopenia, thrombocytopenia, etc, and the main 3-4 grades adverse effects were anorexia, nausea/vomiting, fatigue, and thrombocytopenia. Conclusion： Raltitrexed/bevacizumab combined with irinotecan or oxaliplatin as the secondline and second-line above treatments for advanced colorectal cancer has high disease control rates, and the adverse effect is well tolerated. The combined regimen can be recommended as a phase III clinical research and second-line and secondlines above treatments for advanced colorectal cancer.     

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacogenetic angiogenesis-related markers of first-line FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab schedule in metastatic colorectal cancer

Background:

The identification of molecular and genetic markers to predict or monitor the efficacy of bevacizumab (BV) represents a key issue in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

Methods:

Plasma levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), placental growth factor (PlGF), soluble VEGF receptor 2 (sVEGFR-2) and thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1) were assessed by ELISA assay at different time points in a cohort of 25 patients enroled in a phase II trial of GONO-FOLFOXIRI plus BV as first-line treatment of mCRC. VEGF: −2578A/C, −1498C/T, −1154A/G, −634C/G and 936C/T; and VEGFR-2: −604A/G, +1192C/T and +1719A/T, polymorphisms were assessed in a total of 54 patients.

Results:

Treatment with GONO-FOLFOXIRI plus BV determined a prolonged and significant reduction in plasma free, biologically active VEGF concentration. Interestingly, VEGF concentrations remained lower than at baseline also at the time of PD. Conversely, PlGF levels increased during the treatment if compared with baseline, suggesting a possible role in tumour resistance; moreover, sVEGFR-2 increased at the time of PD, as well as TSP-1. No association of assessed polymorphisms with outcome was found.

Conclusion:

Our study suggested the possible mechanisms of resistance to combined therapy in those patients with a progressive disease to be tested in ongoing phase III randomised studies.     

Cediranib with mFOLFOX6 vs bevacizumab with mFOLFOX6 in previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer

Background:

Cediranib is a highly potent inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signalling with activity against all three VEGF receptors. Bevacizumab is an anti-VEGF-A monoclonal antibody with clinical benefit in previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

Methods:

Patients with mCRC who had progressed following first-line therapy were randomised 1 : 1 : 1 to modified (m)FOLFOX6 plus cediranib (20 or 30 mg day⁻¹) or bevacizumab (10 mg kg⁻¹ every 2 weeks). The primary objective was to compare progression-free survival (PFS) between treatment arms.

Results:

A total of 210 patients were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis (cediranib 20 mg, n=71; cediranib 30 mg, n=73; bevacizumab, n=66). Median PFS in the cediranib 20 mg, cediranib 30 mg and bevacizumab groups was 5.8, 7.2 and 7.8 months, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between treatment arms for PFS (cediranib 20 mg vs bevacizumab: HR=1.28 (95% CI, 0.85–1.95; P=0.29); cediranib 30 mg vs bevacizumab: HR=1.17 (95% CI, 0.77–1.76; P=0.79)) or overall survival (OS). Grade ⩾3 adverse events were more common with cediranib 30 mg (91.8%) vs cediranib 20 mg (81.4%) or bevacizumab (84.8%).

Conclusion:

There were no statistically significant differences between treatment arms for PFS or OS. When combined with mFOLFOX6, the 20 mg day⁻¹ dose of cediranib was better tolerated than the 30 mg day⁻¹ dose.     

Pharmacokinetic parameters from 3-Tesla DCE-MRI as surrogate biomarkers of antitumor effects of bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI in colorectal cancer with liver metastasis

Bevacizumab (BV) is an antivascular endothelial growth factor antibody. When administered with other chemotherapeutic drugs, BV-combined regimens prolong survival of colorectal cancer patients. We conducted a phase II trial to confirm the pharmacokinetic parameters from 3-Tesla dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) as surrogate biomarkers of BV + FOLFIRI regimen efficacy in colorectal cancer with liver metastases. DCE-MRI was performed before treatment, on the seventh day after first treatment and every 8 weeks thereafter using a 3-Tesla MRI system. DCE-MRI parameters-area under the contrast concentration versus time curve at 90 and 180 s (AUC90 and AUC180, respectively) after contrast injection, and volume transfer constant of contrast agents (K(trans) and K(ep) ) were calculated from liver metastases. Fifty-eight liver metastases were analyzed. Univariate analysis revealed that a decrease in K(trans) ratios (ΔK(trans) ), K(ep) ratios (ΔK(ep) ), AUC90 ratios (ΔAUC90) and AUC180 ratios (ΔAUC180) correlated with higher response (all p < 0.0001) and longer time to progression (TTP) (ΔK(trans) : p = 0.001; ΔK(ep) : p = 0.004; ΔAUC90: p = 0.006; ΔAUC180: p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that ΔAUC180 was correlated with higher response (p = 0.009), and ΔK(trans) and ΔAUC180 were correlated with longer TTP (ΔK(trans) : p = 0.001; ΔAUC180: p = 0.024). ΔK(trans) and ΔAUC180 are pharmacodynamic biomarkers of the blood perfusion of BV + FOLFIRI. Our data suggest that ΔK(trans) and ΔK(ep) can predict response to chemotherapy at 1 week. Changes in 3-Tesla DCE-MRI parameters confirmed the potential of these biomarkers of blood perfusion as surrogate predictors of response and TTP.     

Upfront FOLFOXIRI+bevacizumab followed by fluoropyrimidin and bevacizumab maintenance in patients with molecularly unselected metastatic colorectal cancer

Background:

The addition of bevacizumab (BEV) to standard doublet chemotherapy improves outcomes compared with chemotherapy alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The OPAL study examined the effect of BEV+FOLFOXIRI followed by 5FU/LV and BEV maintenance on progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with previously untreated unresectable mCRC.

Methods:

Eligible patients had histologically confirmed mCRC, ECOG performance status ⩽1 and were 18–70 years old. Patients received up to 12 cycles of FOLFOXIRI+BEV q2w (induction phase) followed by up to ⩽40 cycles of 5FU/LV+BEV q2w (maintenance phase). Median PFS was the primary end point; secondary end points included response, OS, secondary resection rate, safety and prognostic value of pharmacogenetic profiling.

Results:

Ninety-seven patients were enrolled. Of these, 90 received study medication and formed the safety population: 64 males; median age 58 (range 28–71) years; ECOG performance status 0/1 in 54%/46% patients; and liver only disease in 35 patients. Relative dose intensities were 79–85% for all four drugs. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was as previously reported and there were no new safety signals. In total, 87 serious AEs occurred in 39 patients (43%). Median PFS was 11.1 months (95% CI 9.4–12.0) and did thus not meet the primary objective of 12 months. Median OS was 32.2 months (95% CI 22.6–36.9). Fifty-two patients were pharmacogenetically profiled.

Conclusions:

FOLFOXIRI+BEV was feasible in this molecularly unselected mCRC patient population, showing a high efficacy in terms of survival, overall response and secondary resection rate. Pharmacogenomic profiling revealed no clinically relevant marker.     

Thrombotic events in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with leucovorin,fluorouracil and irinotican (FOLFIRI) plus bevacizumab

Objective

To determine the incidence and risk factors for thrombotic events (TEs) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who received bevacizumab (BV) and FOLFIRI (leucovorin, fluorouracil and irinotican) compared to FOLFIRI alone.

Methods

Single institution retrospective study of 450 mCRC patients who received either BV plus FOLFIRI or FOLFIRI alone between April 2004 and August 2012. Demographics, TE risk factors, and treatment data were abstracted from patients’ records. Multivariate analysis was used to identify factors that contributed to thromboembolism.

Results

Two-hundred-sixty-one mCRC patients received BV plus FOLFIRI [64.8% males, mean body mass index (BMI) of 27.6] compared to 189 control patients who received FOLFIRI alone (61.9% males, BMI 27.2). The incidence of TEs was 14.9% in the BV plus FOLFIRI group, compared to 15.9% in the control group. Multivariate analysis controlling for age, BMI, gender, malignancy, metastatic sites, line of treatment, and risk factors did not suggest a significant increase in the risk of TE with the addition of BV (OR =0.83 95% CI: 0.40-1.70; P=0.602). No difference in the site of TEs was observed between the treatment groups. The only statistically significant risk factor for thrombosis in the FOLFIRI plus BV group was increased BMI (OR =1.05; 95% CI: 1.01-1.10; P=0.01).

Conclusions

This study does not support a significant increase in the risk of TE in patients with mCRC who received BV in addition to FOLFIRI. Increased BMI may be a risk factor for thrombosis in patients treated with BV.     

Biomarkers of reactive resistance and early disease progression during chemotherapy plus bevacizumab treatment for colorectal carcinoma

Molecular markers for predicting or monitoring the efficacy of bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remain to be identified. We have now measured the serum concentrations of 25 angiogenesis-related molecules with antibody suspension bead array systems for 25 mCRC patients both before and during treatment in a previously reported phase II trial of FOLFIRI chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. The serum concentration of vascular endothelial growth factor–A (VEGF-A) decreased after the onset of treatment (P < 0.0001), whereas that of placental growth factor increased (P < 0.0001). Significant differences in the levels of several factors (such as VEGF-A, soluble VEGF receptor–2, and interleukin-8) were apparent between responders and nonresponders during treatment. The rapid and pronounced decrease in serum VEGF-A level after treatment onset was apparent in all subjects and was independent of the baseline concentration. However, four of nine nonresponders showed a subsequent early increase in the serum VEGF-A level. Our results thus suggest that an early increase in the serum VEGF-A concentration after the initial decrease is a potential predictive marker of a poor response and reactive resistance to bevacizumab plus chemotherapy.     

FOLFOX6 and bevacizumab in non-optimally resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer

Background:

In patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM) R0 resection significantly improves overall survival (OS).

Methods:

In this report, we present the results of a phase II trial of FOLFOX6+bevacizumab in patients with non-optimally resectable CLM. Patients received six cycles of FOLFOX6+ five of bevacizumab. Patients not achieving resectability received six additional cycles of each. A PET-CT was performed at baseline and again within 1 month after initiating treatment.

Results:

From September 2005 to July 2009, 21 patients were enrolled (Male/Female: 15/6; median age: 65 years). An objective response (OR) was documented in 12 cases (57.1% complete responses (CRs): 3, partial response (PR): 9); one patient died from toxicity before surgery. Thirteen patients underwent radical surgery (61.9%). Three (23%) had a pathological CR (pCR). Six patients (46.1%) experienced minor postsurgical complications. After a median 38.8-month follow-up, the median OS was 22.5 months. Patients achieving at least 1 unit reduction in Standard uptake value (SUV)max on PET-CT had longer progression-free survival (PFS) (median PFS: 22 vs 14 months, P=0.001).

Conclusions:

FOLFOX6+bevacizumab does not increase postsurgical complications, yields high rates of resectability and pCR. Early changes in PET-CT seem to be predictive of longer PFS.     

Prognostic/predictive value of 207 serum factors in colorectal cancer treated with cediranib and/or chemotherapy

Background:

The prognostic and predictive value of multiple serum biomarkers was evaluated using samples from a randomised phase III study (HORIZON II) investigating chemotherapy with or without cediranib in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

Methods:

Baseline levels of 207 protein markers were measured in serum samples from 582 HORIZON II (FOLFOX/XELOX plus cediranib 20 mg (n=330) or placebo (n=252)) patients. Median baseline values of each biomarker were used to categorise patients as high or low. Markers were then assessed for their association with efficacy, defined by progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A generalised boosted regression model identified markers of particular interest.

Results:

Correlation of protein levels with PFS and OS suggested that multiple factors had a prognostic value, independent of treatment arm, including IL-6, IL-8, C-reactive protein (CRP), ICAM-1 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). Among the angiogenesis regulators, low levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), VEGF-D, VEGFR-1, VEGFR-3, NRP1 and Tie-2 correlated with better outcome.

Conclusion:

This large data set generated using serum samples from mCRC patients treated with chemotherapy and VEGF inhibitors, defines baseline characteristics for 207 serum proteins. Multiple prognostic factors were identified that could be disease related or predict which patients derive most benefit from 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy, meriting further exploration in prospective studies.     

Identification of serum angiopoietin-2 as a biomarker for clinical outcome of colorectal cancer patients treated with bevacizumab-containing therapy

Background:

The combination of chemotherapy with the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody bevacizumab is a standard of care in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). However, biomarkers predicting outcome of bevacizumab-containing treatment are lacking. As angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) is a key regulator of vascular remodelling in concert with VEGF, we investigated its role as a biomarker in metastatic CRC.

Methods:

Serum Ang-2 levels were measured in 33 healthy volunteers and 90 patients with CRC. Of these, 34 had metastatic disease and received bevacizumab-containing therapy. To determine the tissue of origin of Ang-2, quantitative real-time PCR was performed on microdissected cryosections of human CRC and in a murine xenograft model of CRC using species-specific amplification.

Results:

Ang-2 originated from the stromal compartment of CRC tissues. Serum Ang-2 levels were significantly elevated in patients with metastatic CRC compared with healthy controls. Amongst patients receiving bevacizumab-containing treatment, low pre-therapeutic serum Ang-2 levels were associated with a significant better response rate (82 vs 31% P<0.01), a prolonged median progression-free survival (14.1 vs 8.5 months; P<0.01) and a reduction of 91% in the hazard of death (P<0.05).

Conclusion:

Serum Ang-2 is a candidate biomarker for outcome of patients with metastatic CRC treated with bevacizumab-containing therapy, and it should be further validated to customise combined chemotherapeutic and anti-angiogenic treatment.     

西妥昔单抗联合化疗在晚期结直肠癌一线治疗中的疗效观察

背景与目的:体内、外研究均表明,西妥昔单抗可以抑制表达表皮生长因子的人类肿瘤细胞的增殖并诱导其凋亡以及抑制肿瘤血管形成和转移,并己确立其在一线治疗晚期结直肠癌中的地位.本研究观察其在一线治疗晚期结直肠癌的疗效.方法:2007年2月-2007年12月厦门、泉州、漳州三地共五家医院对9例晚期结直肠癌患者应用西妥昔单抗联合化疗进行一线治疗.结果:一线治疗的9例患者中,完全缓解(CR)1例,部分缓解(PR)3例,稳定(SD)3例,进展(PD)2例,一线治疗的有效率(CR PR)44.4%.疾病控制率(CR PR SD)66.6%.结论:晚期结直肠癌一线治疗使用西妥昔单抗联合化疗有较好的疗效,不良反应可耐受.     

Effect of neutropenia on survival outcomes of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab

Trifluridine (FTD)/tipiracil (TPI) plus bevacizumab (Bev) is a promising late-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Although chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) is a well-known predictor of FTD/TPI efficacy, whether CIN is a predictive marker of efficacy for FTD/TPI + Bev remains unclear. Thus, the present study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of FTD/TPI + Bev and the predictive markers of its efficacy. Clinical data of patients with mCRC who received FTD/TPI + Bev at the Cancer Institute Hospital between January 2017 and August 2020 were retrospectively collected. Disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety were assessed. In addition, subgroup analyses of prognostic and predictive efficacy markers were performed. In total, 94 patients (median age, 60.0 years; age range, 32–82 years; 37 men and 57 women) were included in the present study. The DCR was 44.7%, the median PFS time was 2.9 months (2.3–4.1 months) and the median OS time was 10.0 months (7.3–11.1 months). Grade 3 or 4 CIN within the first cycle of treatment occurred in 27.7% of patients, which was significantly associated with a longer PFS time than those who did not develop CIN [3.8 months (2.3–8.4 months) vs. 2.7 months (1.8–4.0 months); P=0.008]. Furthermore, the DCR was higher in patients with grade 3 or 4 CIN within the first cycle of treatment than those without CIN (61.5 vs. 38.2%; P=0.07). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that grade 3 or 4 CIN within the first cycle of treatment are independent predictors for a longer PFS time (P=0.01). Taken together, the results of the present study suggest that grade 3 or 4 CIN within the first cycle of treatment are early predictors of the efficacy of FTD/TPI + Bev.     

Prognostic significance of mesenteric tumor nodules in patients with stage III colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: Tumor nodules are occasionally found in adjacent mesentery of colorectal cancer specimens and are felt to reflect a worse prognosis. The clinical significance of mesenteric tumor nodules was investigated. METHODS: A review of 786 patients with stage III colorectal cancer referred between 1995 and 1999 was undertaken. TNM staging was standardized by considering mesenteric nodules separately and not assigning them to T or N categories. Survival analyses were performed. RESULTS: Mesenteric tumor nodules were found in 116 (14.8%) patients: 48 (41.4%) with colon cancer and 68 (58.6%) rectal cancer. Mean age at surgery was 63 years. Adjuvant chemotherapy was given to 84.8% of colon cancer patients. Two (2.9%) rectal cancer patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiation, and 63 (92.6%) received adjuvant therapy (chemotherapy and/or radiation). In the cohort with mesenteric nodules, the median time to progression was 23.1 months, the median 5-year disease-free survival was 35%, and the median overall survival (OS) was 47.9 months, with 44% OS at 5 years. In the 19 (16.4%) patients with mesenteric nodules and no lymph nodes the 5-year OS was 60% (SEER stage II 5-year survival 82.5%), whereas in 97 patients who were lymph node-positive the 5-year OS was 40% (SEER 5-year survival stage IIIc 44.3%; stage IV 8.1%). CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to SEER survival data, the presence of mesenteric nodules appears to worsen the prognosis of any T/N0 disease to that of overall stage III disease. Mesenteric nodules with any T/N+ disease had prognosis similar to that of stage IIIC disease, but the prognosis was better than M1 disease. .     

西妥昔单抗与贝伐单抗分别联合FOLFOX4方案治疗晚期结直肠癌的对比研究

目的:比较西妥昔单抗与贝伐单抗分别联合FOLFOX4方案治疗晚期结直肠癌的临床疗效及安全性.方法:回顾性分析2008年9月至2012年9月经组织病理学证实的晚期结直肠癌患者49例,西妥昔单抗联合FOLFOX4方案组26例,贝伐单抗联合FOLFOX4方案组23例.两组患者在性别、年龄、病理类型、分期等方面大致平衡.观察各组临床疗效和治疗期间毒副反应.结果:贝伐单抗联合FOLFOX4方案治疗转移性结直肠癌有效率低于西妥昔单抗联合FOLFOX4方案(P<0.01).两组间毒副反应发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论:西妥昔单抗联合化疗对K-Ras基因为野生型的转移性结直肠癌患者的疗效优于贝伐单抗,且耐受性好.