Glomerular filtration rate prior to high-dose melphalan 200 mg/m(2) as a surrogate marker of outcome in patients with myeloma

We correlated age and body surface area corrected glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at the time of high-dose melphalan (HDM) administration with treatment-related toxicity (TT), time to disease progression and survival. Between 8/85 and 6/98, 144 newly diagnosed myeloma patients with a median age of 53 years (range, 31-72) received infusional chemotherapy with vincristine, doxorubicin and methylprednisolone, with/without cyclophosphamide or verapamil, followed by HDM 200 mg/m(2)and stem cell rescue. An additional patient received HDM at diagnosis. GFR was below normal in 38 patients (26%). At presentation, patients with low GFR at the time of HDM had higher serum creatinine, beta(2)M, stage III disease, calcium and Bence-Jones proteinuria. Toxic deaths post-HDM were similar in both groups (2/38 (5%) vs. 4/107 (4%)), though patients with low GFR had more oral mucositis (P< 0.0001), diarrhoea (P = 0.005) and infections (P = 0.04). The response and relapse rates of the 2 groups were not substantially different, but the median overall survival (OS) was significantly shorter in patients with low GFR (5.1 vs 7.5 years, P = 0.015). Multivariate analysis showed that a normal GFR and being in CR at the time of HDM were predictive of longer OS. We conclude that in context of high-dose chemotherapy for myeloma, dose of melphalan should not be modified in patients with low GFR and that early intensive treatment at relapse may improve results in patients with abnormal renal function.     

Results of a phase I/II trial adding carmustine (300 mg/m2) to melphalan (200 mg/m2) in multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation.

Autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) with high-dose melphalan (HDM, 200 mg/m2) is the most effective therapy for multiple myeloma. To determine the feasibility of combining carmustine (300 mg/m2) with HDM, we enrolled 49 patients with previously treated Durie-Salmon stage II/III myeloma (32M/17W, median age 53) on a phase I/II trial involving escalating doses of melphalan (160, 180, 200 mg/m2). The median beta2-microglobulin was 2.5 (0-9.3); marrow karyotypes were normal in 88%. The phase I dose-limiting toxicity was > or =grade 2 pulmonary toxicity 2 months post-SCT. Other endpoints were response rate and progression-free survival (PFS). HDM was safely escalated to 200 mg/m2; treatment-related mortality was 2% and > or =grade 2 pulmonary toxicity 10%. The complete (CR) and near complete (nCR) response rate was 49%. With a median post-SCT follow-up of 2.9 years, the PFS and overall survival (OS) post-SCT were 2.3 and 4.7 years. PFS for those with CR or nCR was 3.1 years while for those with stable disease (SD) it was 1.3 years (P=0.06). We conclude that carmustine can be combined with HDM for myeloma with minimal pulmonary toxicity and a high response rate.     

Multiple myeloma: comparison of two dose-intensive melphalan regimens (100 vs 200 mg/m(2)).

Several trials have shown the superior impact of high-dose melphalan (usually 200 mg/m(2), MEL200) vs standard therapy in myeloma patients. Intermediate-dose melphalan (100 mg/m(2), MEL100) is also superior to the standard dose, but has not been clinically compared with MEL200. A total of 90 patients at diagnosis were treated with two MEL100 courses. Their clinical outcome was compared with that of a control group of 90 pair mates matched for serum beta2-microglobulin levels and Durie and Salmon clinical stage. These patients were treated at diagnosis with two MEL200 courses. Patient characteristics were similar in both groups except that the median age of the MEL100 group was significantly higher (P<0.0001). Complete remission was 35% after MEL100 and 48% after MEL200 (P=0.08). Median event-free survival (EFS) was 32 months in the MEL100 group and 42 months in the MEL200 group (P<0.005), but overall survival (OS) was not different. Transplant-related mortality was not significantly different. Haematological and extra-haematological toxicity was significantly reduced after MEL100. Despite the significant age difference, tandem MEL100 was less toxic than tandem MEL200, and MEL100 was inferior to MEL200 in terms of EFS but not in terms of OS. The intensified nonmyeloablative MEL100 regimen is an effective first-line treatment.     

Single agent high-dose cisplatin (200 mg m-2) treatment in ovarian carcinoma.

Twenty patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma were treated with high-dose cisplatin 200mg m-2. Patients were to receive three cycles at 21 day intervals. Treatment was stopped if severe myelosuppression or any neurotoxicity occurred. Overall, eight (40%) of patients responded with a complete response in five (25%). Four of 16 (25%) previously treated patients responded. The median duration of response was 44 weeks (range 6-130). In patients previously treated there was a significant association (P < 0.002) between response and a remission free interval of 52 weeks or more from primary chemotherapy. Toxicity was assessable in 18 patients. Alopecia and nausea/vomiting were common. Myelosuppression was recorded in nine patients delaying planned administration in eight of 35 cycles. Five patients developed anaemia and six thrombocytopenia. Neurotoxicity affected seven patients and varying degrees of tinnitus six patients. Neurotoxicity and myelosuppression were indications for cessation of treatment in 8 patients receiving less than three cycles. Analysis revealed no significant association between toxicity and prior cisplatin exposure, age or the amount of high-dose cisplatin administered. This series reveals that it is possible to achieve good response rates using high-dose cisplatin without encountering debilitating neurotoxicity.     

Pharmacokinetics of high-dose melphalan in children and adults

Summary Melphalan pharmacokinetics were studied in 20 children with stage IV neuroblastomas or Ewing's sarcomas and in 10 adults with AML, ALL, or small cell lung carcinomas, after IV administration of high doses (140 mg/m² with furosemide-induced diuresis and 180 mg/m² without induced diuresis) and high fluid intake (3000 ml/m²/day).Unchanged melphalan was assayed in plasma and cereorospinal fluid by means of a high-performance liquid chromatographic procedure. The elimination half-life (t_1/280 min) allows autologous bone marrow transplantation 24 h after the drug administration. In some children we were able to detect melphalan in cerebrospinal fluid samples.     

Pharmacokinetics of melphalan in children following high-dose intravenous injection

The pharmacokinetics of high-dose IV melphalan (140 or 220 mg m-2) were studied after 12 administrations in 10 children (aged 2.5-16 years) undergoing chemotherapy for either neuroblastoma or Ewing's tumour. To assess whether a simpler and less expensive nitrobenzylpyridine (NBP) spectrophotometric assay for alkylating activity was a satisfactory alternative to high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC), the plasma melphalan concentration was estimated by both methods in five cases. Analysis of the disposition of melphalan gave a mean half-life of 1.3 +/- 1.0 (SD) h, clearance 18.4 +/- 9.4 l X h-1 X m-2, and apparent volume of distribution 26.3 +/- 18.0 l X m-2. These pharmacokinetic parameters were similar to those found in adults: no correlation was found between any parameter and age or glomerular filtration rate. NBP alkylating activity determinations yielded consistent results and good correlation with plasma melphalan concentration. However, concordance analysis indicated a consistent bias, the NBP assay always giving lower estimates of plasma melphalan concentration: HPLC assay therefore remains the method of choice for determining plasma melphalan pharmacokinetics.     

Pharmacokinetics of very high-dose oral melphalan in cancer patients

The pharmacokinetics and systemic availability of melphalan after high-dose oral administration with and without 1,3-bis(2-Chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU) or etoposide were examined in three patients undergoing autologous bone marrow transplantation. Patient 1 (advanced melanoma) received melphalan at 80 mg/m2/day p.o. on days -6, -5, and -4, followed by BCNU at 300 mg/m2/day i.v. on days -3, -2, and -1 prior to bone marrow transplantation. Patient 2 (advanced colon carcinoma) received melphalan at 75 mg/m2/day p.o. on days -3, -2, and -1. Patient 3 (advanced refractory lymphoma) received etoposide at 800 mg/m2/day i.v. on days -7, -5, and -3, followed by melphalan at 157 mg/m2/day p.o. on days -2 and -1. Melphalan was administered as a bolus oral dose, using 2-mg tablets. Blood samples were collected at 0, 5, 10, 15, 30, and 45 min and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h after each dose of melphalan. Peak plasma melphalan concentrations in the three patients ranged from 0.354 (patient 2) to 1.768 micrograms/ml (patient 1). Plasma melphalan concentration X time products (C x Ts) showed extreme variability in one patient (patient 2), ranging from 0.76 to 4.48 micrograms.h/ml. To determine the relative systemic availability of orally administered melphalan, i.v. C X Ts proportional to the p.o. doses were extrapolated from previously reported i.v. bolus pharmacokinetic data. The p.o.:i.v. plasma C X T ratios for high-dose melphalan ranged between 0.09 (patient 3) and 0.58 (patient 2). Although these C X T data suggest a dose-response for orally administered melphalan, the systemic availability of these high p.o. melphalan doses was extremely variable, both within and between study patients. Thus, we cannot recommend the use of high-dose p.o. melphalan regimens in patients undergoing autologous bone marrow transplantation.     

Pharmacokinetics of high-dose intravenous melphalan in children and adults with forced diuresis

Summary The pharmacokinetic parameters of the alkylating agent melphalan were determined in 15 children and 11 adults with advanced malignant solid tumors. High IV bolus doses of 140 mg/m² were given under standard hyperhydration conditions and followed by autologous bone marrow grafting. In all cases the time-concentration curves could be best fitted to a biexponential pattern. A high scattering of drug concentrations was observed in our patients, the disposition half-lives ranging in the whole group from 17.8 to 71.2 min. The areas under the curves also showed a wide variation, ranging from 175 to 682 mg l^-1 min^-1. In all patients, melphalan levels in plasma were unmeasurable at 8 h or earlier, indicating that bone marrow can be safely reinfused at that time. No difference was apparent between children and adults regarding the drug pharmacokinetics. In each of 11 cerebrospinal fluid samples drawn 45–150 min after melphalan administration, drug levels were unmeasurable.     

Toxicity of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (60 mg/600 mg/m2) in adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer

We evaluated the toxicity of 4 cycles of doxorubicin (60 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) every 3 weeks (AC 60/600) in adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Between 1994 and 2003, 62 patients received 6 cycles of doxorubicin (40 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2) every 3 weeks (AC 40/500), and 106 patients received AC 60/600 as adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. The performance status of all patients was 0 or 1. Toxicity was determined using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) ver. 2. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was frequent in AC 60/600 (6.5% vs 24.3%, p < 0.001). However, febrile neutropenia was not significant in either group (1.6% vs 3.8%, p = 0.39). There was also no statistical difference in the toxicity greater than grade 3 of anemia, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, diarrhea and cardiotoxicity. There was no treatment-related death in both groups. The number of patients who completed chemotherapy was higher in those receiving AC 60/600 than in those receiving AC 40/500 (91.9% vs 99.1%, p = 0.026). AC 60/600 is tolerated and feasible in adjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer in Japanese patients from the viewpoint of toxicities.     

Experience with intermediate-dose (110–120 mg/m2) epirubicin

Summary A total of 23 patients with advanced malignancies received escalating doses of epirubicin (100–120 mg/m²) i.v. at 3-week intervals; 15 had received previous chemotherapy. In all, 46 courses of chemotherapy were given. Mucositis (grade II or III) occurred in 47% of courses at 120 mg/m², but in only 15% of courses at 115 mg/m². Myelotoxicity was manifest as leucopenia, with a median white blood count nadir of 1.9 (range, 0.8–7.0)×10⁹/l. Nausea and vomiting were generally well controlled by prophylactic antiemetic therapy. Alopecia was WHO grade 0 in 2 patients, grade I in 1, grade II in 5 and grade III in 14. No renal or hepatic toxicity was noted, and there were no episodes of congestive cardiac failure. One fatal coronary thrombosis (proven at post-mortem examination) occurred 48 h after a dose of 115 mg/m². Four patients developed thrombophlebitis at the injection site that was not dose-related; it occurred at doses between 100 and 120 mg/m². Two patients who had been given chemotherapy in the past had complete responses (one penile carcinoma, one gastric carcinoma). Six patients had partial responses, including two with breast cancer, one with gastric cancer and three with sarcoma. Intermediate-dose epirubicin was well tolerated up to 120 mg/m², when mucositis became a significant clinical problem. Preliminary data suggest promising activity in gastric cancer, breast cancer and a variety of sarcomas.     

Pharmacokinetics of Once-a-Day Netilmicin (4.5 mg/kg) in Neonates

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics of once-a-day netilmicin (4.5 mg/kg) was studied in 16 neonates, divided for analysis into three groups according to gestational age: group I >36 weeks (n=7); group II between 34-36 weeks (n=4); and group III <34 weeks (n=5). The serum netilmicin (mean ± SD) 4h and 24h after the first dose were 4.7 ± 0.8 and 0.8 ± 0.5 mg/L; 4.9 ± 0.8 and 1.9 ± 0.2 mg/L; 4.9 ± 0.5 and 1.7 ± 0.5 mg/L in groups I, II and III respectively. After the second dose, concentrations at 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 h were 7.2 ± 1.0, 5.0 ± 0.8, 3.0 ± 0.6, 1.7 ± 0.4 and 0.9 ± 0.2 mg/L (group I); 8.6 ± 0.2, 6.1 ± 0.5, 4.2 ± 0.7, 2.6 ± 0.1 and 1.4 ± 0.4 mg (group II); 9.0 ± 1.2, 6.3 ± 0.9, 4.0 ± 0.7, 2.6 ± 0.5 and 1.7 ± 0.3 mg/L (group III). There was a large degree of inter-patient variability in serum concentrations and serum half-life (t½), volume of distribution (VD), area-under-the-curve (AUC), relative serum clearance (Clp) such that these parameters could not be correlated to age or weight. Absolute serum clearance (L/h) was correlated with gestational age (r = 0.672, P <0.01). There was no statistically significant evidence of accumulation between the first and second doses for any patient group. One baby from each group II and group III had concentration >2 mg/L 24h after the first dose and one baby from group III had concentration >2 mg/L 24h after the second dose. There are no established correlations between serum netilmicin concentrations and efficacy or toxicity in neonates and keeping 24 h trough concentration below 2 mg/L with a once-a-day dose of 4.5 mg/L would have to be validated in terms of its clinical efficacy and potential toxicity in a neonatal population.     

Paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) plus carboplatin (6 AUC) versuspaclitaxel (225 mg/m2) plus carboplatin (6 AUC) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A multicenter randomized trial

Purpose:The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin has becomea widely used regimen in NSCLC due to phase II reports of moderate toxicity,reasonable activity and easy outpatient administration. Purpose of our presentprospective study was to evaluate the dose–response relationship ofpaclitaxel. Patients and methods:Since July 1996, 198 patients withnon-operable NSCLC and measurable disease without previous chemotherapyentered the trial. Ninety nine patients (group A) were randomized to receivepaclitaxel 175 mg/m² in three-hour infusion plus carboplatin dosedto an area under the concentration–time curve of 6 every 3 weeks and 99(group B) to receive the same regimen with paclitaxel increased to 225mg/m². Eligibility criteria included WHO performance status0–2, documented inoperable stage IIIA and IIIB, IV, no brain metastasis,no prior chemotherapy and adequate renal and hepatic function. Patients inboth groups were well-matched with baseline disease characteristics. Results:In group A with 90 evaluable patients, the response ratewas 25.6%(6 CR, 17 PR) whereas in group B with 88 evaluable patients,the response rate was 31.8% (3 CR, 25 PR),P = 0.733. Mediantime to progression favored the high-dose paclitaxel (4.3 vs. 6.4 months,P = 0.044). The median survival was 9.5 months for group A versus11.4 months for group B (P = 0.16). The one-year survival was37% for group A and 44% for group B (P = 0.35). Thebest prognostic factor for one-year survival was the response rate (P< 0.0001). With a relative dose intensity of paclitaxel 0.94 in bothgroups, neurotoxicity (P = 0.025) and leucopenia (P = 0.038)were more pronounced in group B patients. No toxic death was observed. Conclusions:Higher dose paclitaxel prolongs the median time toprogression but causes more neurotoxicity and leucopenia. The better responserate, the longer overall and better one-year survival seen with the higherdose of paclitaxel are not statistically significant.     

Pharmacokinetics of once-a-day netilmicin (4.5 mg/kg) in neonates.

The pharmacokinetics of once-a-day netilmicin (4.5 mg/kg) was studied in 16 neonates, divided for analysis into three groups according to gestational age: group 1 >36 weeks (n=7); group II between 34-36 weeks (n=4); and group III <34 weeks (n=5). The serum netilmicin (mean +/- SD) 4h and 24h after the first dose were 4.7 +/- 0.8 and 0.8 +/- 0.5 mg/L; 4.9 +/- 0.8 and 1.9 +/-0.2 mg/L; 4.9 +/- 0.5 and 1.7 +/- 0.5 mg/L in groups I, II and III respectively. After the second dose, concentrations at 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 h were 7.2 +/- 1.0, 5.0 +/- 0.8, 3.0 +/- 0.6, 1.7 +/- 0.4 and 0.9 +/- 0.2 mg/L (group I); 8.6 +/- 0.2, 6.1 +/- 0.5, 4.2 +/- 0.7, 2.6 +/- 0.1 and 1.4 +/- 0.4 mg (group II); 9.0 +/- 1.2, 6.3 +/- 0.9, 4.1 +/- 0.7, 2.6 +/- 0.5 and 1.7 +/- 0.3 mg/L (group III). There was a large degree of inter-patient variability in serum concentrations and serum half-life (t1/2), volume of distribution (VD), area-under-the-curve (AUC), relative serum clearance (Clp) such that these parameters could not be correlated to age or weight. Absolute serum clearance (L/h) was correlated with gestational age (r = 0.672, P <0.01). There was no statistically significant evidence of accumulation between the first and second doses for any patient group. One baby from each group II and group III had concentration >2 mg/L 24h after the first dose and one baby from group III had concentration >2 mg/L 24h after the second dose. There are no established correlations between serum netilmicin concentrations and efficacy or toxicity in neonates and keeping 24 h trough concentration below 2 mg/L with a once-a-day dose of 4.5 mg/L would have to be validated in terms of its clinical efficacy and potential toxicity in a neonatal population.     

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of high-dose paclitaxel monotherapy (825 mg/m2 continuous infusion over 24 h) with hematopoietic support in women with metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE: We evaluated the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of high-dose paclitaxel (HDP) monotherapy (825 mg/m2 continuous infusion over 24 h) with peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) and G-CSF support in 17 women with metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data were collected in 17 women entered in a phase II trial of sequential HDP, and high-dose melphalan and cyclophosphamide/thiotepa/carboplatin. RESULTS: The maximal plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC), apparent clearance (Clapp), duration of plasma concentration above 0.05 microM (t > 0.05 microM) for paclitaxel were (means SD): 9.11 +/- 7.45 microM, 145 +/- 88 microM x h, 8.06 +/- 2.90 l/h per m2 and 82.4 +/- 31.2 h, respectively. There was a significant correlation between the plasma paclitaxel concentration at 1 h (r2 = 0.87), 12 h (r2 = 0.85) and 23 h (r2 =0.92) and the AUC (P < 0.0001). Duration of neutropenia was brief (median 3 days, range 0-5 days) and neutrophil recovery occurred earlier (median 6 days, range 0-7 days) than could be attributed to infused PBPC. Median nadir count for platelets was 66 x 10(9)/l (range 13-160 x 10(9)/l). Pharmacodynamic analysis showed no correlation between pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax, AUC, t > 0.05 microM) and time to neutropenic nadir, duration of neutropenia, platelet count nadir and grades of neuropathy or mucositis. In ten patients in whom detailed neurologic and nerve conduction studies were performed, linear regression analysis showed a significant correlation between pre- and post-HDP treatment total neuropathy scores (r2 = 0.46, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: HDP (825 mg/m2 continuous infusion over 24 h) did not appear to be myeloablative. The degree of neurotoxicity subsequent to HDP was associated with the degree of baseline neuropathy but was not predictable from pharmacokinetic parameters.     

Pharmacokinetics of oral melphalan in relation to renal function in multiple myeloma patients

The impact of renal function on oral melphalan pharmacokinetics was studied in 15 patients with multiple myeloma. A two-fold interindividual variation in the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) was found. An increase in AUC and melphalan mean residence time (MRT) was noted in patients with renal dysfunction. No correlation was found between GFR and the terminal plasma half-life time. We conclude from these results that renal dysfunction is associated with an increase in AUC and MRT of oral melphalan. A careful follow-up of hematological toxicity and possibly a dose reduction of melphalan are proposed for myeloma patients with renal impairment.     

Doubling epirubicin dose intensity (100 mg/m2 versus 50 mg/m2) in the FEC regimen significantly increases response rates. An international randomised phase III study in metastatic breast cancer

Purpose: A phase III study was performed in patients with metastaticbreast cancer (MBC) to evaluate the effect on response rate and survival ofa doubling of the epirubicin dose intensity.Patients and methods: Four hundred fifty-six patients were randomisedto receive either epirubicin 100 mg/m² or 50mg/m² in combination with 5-FU (500 mg/m²) andcyclophosphamide (500 mg/m²) (FEC 100 vs. FEC 50) i.v., every21 days for a maximum of six cycles (eight in case of CR).Results: Of 456 patients, 390 were evaluable for efficacy. Objectiveresponse (CR + PR) was seen in 57% (FEC 100) vs. 41% (FEC 50)of the evaluable patients (P = 0.003). The CR rate was higher in the FEC100 arm (12% vs. 7%, P = 0.07). FEC 100 producedsignificantly higher response rates in patients with visceral localisation(50% vs. 34%, P = 0.011) and in patients with more thantwo metastatic organ sites (64% vs. 37%, P = 0.001).Median time to progression (7.6 vs. 7 months) and overall survival (18 monthsvs. 17 months) were similar. Myelosuppression was the principal toxic effect,with grade IV neutropenia observed in 57% of the patients treated withFEC 100 vs. 9% of those on FEC 50. Grade IV infection or febrileneutropenia were observed in 8% (FEC 100) vs. 0.4% (FEC 50), butthe incidence of septic death was the same in the two arms (two patientseach). Cardiac toxicity was similar in the two treatment groups, with5% vs. 3% of the patients taken off study due to cardiac events,primarily due to a decline in LVEF. Only three patients (two in FEC 100)experienced congestive heart failure.Conclusion: This trial shows that FEC with epirubicin at 100mg/m² can be administered for repeated cycles without bonemarrow support with increased, though acceptable, toxicity and with asignificant increase of antitumor effect (especially in visceral and/orhigh-burden disease), but no increased survival.     

300 mg/m2 carboplatin (Cb), adriamycin (A) cyclophosphamide (C) (CACb-300) combination in advanced ovarian carcinoma: a feasibility study

Summary Carboplatin (Cb) is an active drug in ovarian carcinoma that has fewer visceral side effects than cisplatin (CDDP) but higher myelotoxicity, which makes it difficult to combine at efficient doses with other myelotoxic drugs. In a preliminary study in advanced ovarian carcinoma, Rosso et al. [4] showed the maximum tolerated dose of Cb given in combination with cyclophosphamide (C) and adriamycin (A) to be 200 mg/m². Since the efficacy of Cb may be dose-dependent, as is that of CDDP, we started a feasibility study of a CACb-300 regimen, that is, using Cb at 300 mg/m² with lower C and A doses. Our data shows that the CACb-300 combination can safely be given in previously untreated patients for at least six 28-day cycles.