Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with level II vena caval thrombectomy: survival porcine study

PURPOSE: Inferior vena caval tumor thrombus due to renal cell carcinoma generally precludes laparoscopic techniques for radical nephrectomy. We developed the technique of laparoscopic infrahepatic (level II) inferior vena caval thrombectomy in a survival porcine model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of the 7 female pigs used in the study 2 were acute and 5 were chronic animals which were allowed to survive for 6 weeks postoperatively. Laparoscopic right radical nephrectomy and inferior vena caval thrombectomy were performed in accordance with established open surgical principles, including vascular control and intracorporeal reconstruction of the vena cava and left renal vein. RESULTS: Complete removal of the simulated caval thrombus was successful in each case without intraoperative or postoperative complications. Average operative time was 160 minutes. Postoperatively inferior venacavography showed a patent vena cava and left renal vein in all animals. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy was successful in an animal model simulating renal cell carcinoma with infrahepatic vena caval tumor thrombus. Clinical application of this technique appears possible.     

Laparoscopic partial adrenalectomy

Background: Most laparoscopic adrenalectomies involve total removal of the whole adrenal gland, and reports of laparoscopic partial adrenalectomies have been very few. The criteria for performing a laparoscopic partial adrenalectomy have not been described. Methods: (a) Patients with functioning adrenal tumors smaller than 3 cm in diameter were selected. (b) The solitary adrenal tumors were evaluated by preoperative thin-slice computed tomography (CT) scan. (c) Solitary lesions were reconfirmed with intraoperative ultrasonography. (d) Partial adrenalectomy was performed with at least a 5-mm margin using a vascular stapler. Results: Laparoscopic partial adrenalectomy was performed in five patients using the vascular stapler. Hemostasis was perfect in all five patients. The tumor was located in the inferior part of the right adrenal gland in three cases and in the upper pole of the left adrenal gland in two cases. The postoperation pathologic diagnosis was adrenocortical adenoma in all five patients, and excessive hormonal levels or symptoms all disappeared. Conclusions: Laparoscopic partial adrenalectomy can be performed safely using a vascular stapler. Received: 26 May 1998/Accepted: 30 June 1998     

腹腔镜下根治性肾切除并肾静脉及腔静脉取栓术

目的 探讨腹腔镜下根治性肾切除并肾静脉及腔静脉取栓术的可行性. 方法 右肾占位病变患者2例.增强CT显示1例肿物部分延伸至肾静脉及腔静脉内,1例右肾静脉内可见充盈缺损并突入腔静脉内.均在全麻下行经后腹腔镜下根治性右肾切除及肾静脉、腔静脉取栓术.术中放置4个穿刺套管针,切断肾动脉后游离腔静脉及肾静脉,腔镜血管阻断钳部分阻断腔静脉,切开腔静脉取出瘤栓,缝合腔静脉,完整切除肾脏及瘤栓. 结果 2例患者的腔静脉瘤栓长度分别为0.3和1.0 cm,均安全取出,术后恢复良好,5 d出院.病理诊断分别为上皮样肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤和肾透明细胞癌1～2级.术后随访5个月未见肿瘤复发和转移. 结论 对选择性肾肿瘤并肾静脉及腔静脉瘤栓患者行腹腔镜下根治性肾切除并肾静脉及腔静脉取栓术安全可行.     

Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy incorporating intraoperative ultrasonography for renal cell carcinoma with renal vein tumor thrombus

The purpose of this study was to describe the technique of laparoscopic right radical nephrectomy incorporating intraoperative, real-time ultrasonography in the management of renal cell carcinoma with level 1 renal vein tumor thrombus. With the patient in a modified flank position, a transperitoneal four-port approach was used to laparoscopically resect an 8.5-cm right renal mass with tumor thrombus extending to, but not into, the inferior vena cava. Early arterial control with gentle traction on the right renal vein provided a short proximal renal venous segment devoid of tumor on laparoscopic inspection. Intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasonography allowed confident identification of the proximal extent of the tumor thrombus. After hilar control, complete resection and intact removal of the renal specimen was performed using standard non-hand-assisted laparoscopic techniques. The actual surgical time was 180 minutes. Surgical resection was successfully performed laparoscopically. No postoperative complications or hospital readmission occurred. Pathologic examination confirmed T3b renal cell carcinoma with negative surgical margins. Laparoscopic right radical nephrectomy incorporating intraoperative, real-time ultrasonography is feasible in the management of renal cell carcinoma with a large-sized level 1 renal vein thrombus. Additional studies are necessary to evaluate its role in urologic oncologic surgery.     

Hand assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena caval thrombus

PURPOSE: To our knowledge we present the initial clinical report of hand assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma with tumor thrombus extending into the inferior vena cava. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 76-year-old man was referred to our medical center with a 12.5 x 10 cm. stage T3b right renal tumor extending into the inferior vena cava. The caval thrombus was limited and completely below the level of the hepatic veins. After preoperative renal embolization via the hand assisted transperitoneal approach the right kidney was completely dissected with the renal hilum. Proximal and distal control of the inferior vena cava was obtained with vessel loops and a single lumbar vein was divided between clips. An endoscopic Satinsky vascular clamp was placed on the inferior vena cava just beyond its juncture with the right renal vein, thereby, encompassing the caval thrombus. The inferior vena cava was opened above the Satinsky clamp and a cuff of the inferior vena cava was removed contiguous with the renal vein. The inferior vena cava was repaired with continuous 4-zero vascular polypropylene suture and the Satinsky clamp was then removed. A literature search failed to reveal any similar reports of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for stage T3b renal cell cancer. RESULTS: Surgery was completed without complication with an estimated 500 cc blood loss. Pathological testing confirmed stage T3b grade 3 renal adenocarcinoma with negative inferior vena caval and soft tissue margins. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of vascular laparoscopic instrumentation and the hand assisted approach enabled us to extend the indications for laparoscopic radical nephrectomy to patients with minimal inferior venal caval involvement.     

Transitional cell carcinoma of the renal pelvis forming tumor thrombus in the vena cava

A 47-year-old man presented with a left renal incidentaloma without hematuria. The tumor was complicated by inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombus extending from Th11 to L4. A temporary IVC filter was introduced prior to surgery. A midline incision was used to perform a left radical nephrectomy and en bloc lymphadenectomy with excision of the inferior vena cava from above the level of the left renal vein to 2.5 cm above the confluence of the common iliac veins. The pathological diagnosis was invasive transitional cell carcinoma. The tumor thrombus consisted of transitional cell carcinoma that histologically invaded the walls of the IVC. He died of cancer 17 months after the operation for the liver metastases. This is the 18th case report of such a presentation in the literature.     

Is adrenalectomy a necessary component of radical nephrectomy? UCLA experience with 511 radical nephrectomies

PURPOSE: We determine the incidence and characteristics of adrenal involvement in localized and advanced renal cell carcinoma, and evaluate the role of adrenalectomy as part of radical nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 511 patients undergoing radical nephrectomy with ipsilateral adrenalectomy for renal cell carcinoma at our medical center between 1986 and 1998 were reviewed. Mean patient age was 63.2 years (range 38 to 85), and 78% of the subjects were males and 22% were females. Patients were divided into subgroups of 164 with localized (stage T1-2 tumor, group 1) and 347 with advanced (stage T3-4N01M01, group 2) renal cell carcinoma. Staging of tumors was performed according to the 1997 TNM guidelines. A retrospective review of preoperative computerized tomography (CT) of the abdomen was performed. Radiographic findings were subsequently compared to postoperative histopathological findings to assess the predictive value of tumor characteristics and imaging in determining adrenal metastasis. RESULTS: Of the 511 patients 29 (5.7%) had adrenal involvement. Average size of the adrenal tumor was 3.86 cm. (standard deviation 1.89). Tumor stage correlated with probability of adrenal spread, with T4, T3 and T1-2 tumors accounting for 40%, 7.8% and 0.6% of cases, respectively. Upper pole intrarenal renal cell carcinoma most likely to spread was local extension to the adrenal glands, representing 58.6% of adrenal involvement. In contrast, multifocal, lower pole and mid region renal cell carcinoma tumors metastasized hematogenously, representing 32%, 7% and 4% of adrenal metastasis, respectively. The relationship between intrarenal tumor size (mean 8.9 cm., range 3 to 17) and adrenal involvement (independent of stage) was not statistically significant. Renal vein thrombus involvement was demonstrated in 8 of 12 cases (67%) with left and 2 of 9 (22%) with right adrenal involvement. Preoperative CT demonstrated 99.6% specificity, 99.4% negative predictive value, 89.6% sensitivity and 92.8% positive predictive value for adrenal involvement by renal cell carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: With a low incidence of 0.6%, adrenal involvement is not likely in patients with localized, early stage renal cell carcinoma and adrenalectomy is unnecessary, particularly when CT is negative. In contrast, the 8.1% incidence of adrenal involvement with advanced renal cell carcinoma supports the need for adrenalectomy. Careful review of preoperative imaging is required to determine the need for adrenalectomy in patients at increased risk with high stage lesions, renal vein thrombus and upper pole or multifocal intrarenal tumors. With a negative predictive value of 99.4%, negative CT should decrease the need for adrenalectomy. In contrast, positive findings are less reliable given the relatively lower positive predictive value of this imaging modality. Although such positive findings may raise suspicion of adrenal involvement, they may not necessarily indicate adrenalectomy given the low incidence, unless renal cell carcinoma with risk factors, such as high stage, upper pole location, multifocality and renal vein thrombus, is present.     

腹腔镜下微创手术治疗肾癌合并高位肝后下腔静脉癌栓

目的探讨腹腔镜下微创手术治疗肾癌合并高位肝后下腔静脉癌栓的临床经验和文献分析。 方法女性患者,61岁,临床诊断：右肾癌合并高位肝后下腔静脉癌栓。术前全面评估手术风险,组织多学科会诊为患者制定详尽的围手术期治疗与护理方案,拟行腹腔镜下右侧肾癌根治性切除+高位肝后下腔静脉癌栓取出+腹膜后淋巴结清扫术。术后医护密切配合严密观察患者病情变化,进行围手术期观察处理与护理。 结果手术顺利完成,手术时间390 min,无中转开放手术。术中完全游离右侧和左侧肾静脉、肝后下腔静脉直达第二肝门水平远端,近右肾静脉处下腔静脉内侧壁剪开静脉壁,癌栓下部小灶性侵犯静脉壁,切除部分腔静脉壁完整取出癌栓,恢复左侧肾静脉、腔静脉血流回流无障碍。术后病理提示符合透明细胞癌,癌组织侵犯肾窦脂肪,腹膜后淋巴结（-）。术后随访6个月未见肿瘤复发。 结论腹腔镜下微创手术治疗肾癌合并高位肝后下腔静脉癌栓安全可行,多学科协助模式为疑难复杂病例提供了一种新的选择,值得临床进一步推广。     

Hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy using intraoperative ultrasonography for left renal cell carcinoma involving a level I renal vein tumor thrombus

This report concerns two male patients, 65 (case 1) and 72 (case 2) years old, with a left renal tumor involving a level I renal vein tumor thrombus, who underwent hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy using intraoperative ultrasonography. With the patient in the flank position, a midline supraumbilical hand port and two other ports were placed. Intraoperative ultrasonography identified the extent of the tumor thrombus. After hilar control, complete resection with intact removal was performed. Surgery lasted 305 min for case 1 and 237 min for case 2, with respective estimated blood loss of 410 mL and 572 mL. No postoperative complications occurred. Pathological examination showed a clear cell carcinoma with a level I tumor thrombus and negative surgical margins. Because the ultrasound probe can be easily inserted and the specimen can be extracted safely and intact, hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is practicable and effective for left renal cell carcinoma involving a level I renal vein tumor thrombus.     

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: contemporary technique and outcomes

OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy has emerged as a viable alternative to open partial nephrectomy while minimizing patient morbidity. In this article and accompanying video we describe our current technique of LPN and review our outcomes in specific patient sub-sets. METHODS: Since September 1999 more than 500 laparoscopic partial nephrectomies have been performed by the senior author. Data were collected prospectively. All patients underwent a three-dimensional CT scan prior to the operation. Our established technique involves preoperative ureteral catheterization, laparoscopic renal ultrasonography to delineate the tumor, en bloc clamping of the renal hilar vascular pedicle, tumor excision with cold endoshears, pelvicaliceal suture repair and parenchymal closure over Surgicel bolsters with biologic hemostatic agent. Renal hypothermia was achieved laparoscopically with ice slush in selected cases with anticipated long warm ischemia time. RESULTS: Mean tumor size was 2.9 cm (1-10.3 cm), 31% of the tumors were greater than 3 cm, 5% occurred in a solitary kidney, and tumor location was central in 40% and hilar in 6% of patients. Transperitoneal approach was employed in 65% of the cases. Mean warm ischemia time was 32 min. Intraoperative complications occurred in 5.5%. Pathology confirmed renal cell carcinoma in 75% of the tumors. In the initial 100 patients with a 3 years minimum follow-up, overall survival was 86% and cancer-specific survival was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is a technically challenging procedure. Adequate prior experience with laparoscopy is necessary. Long-term functional and oncological outcomes are being confirmed currently.     

Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for cancer with level I renal vein involvement

PURPOSE: Venous involvement develops in 5% to 10% of patients with renal cell carcinoma and is generally considered a relative contraindication to laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. To our knowledge we report the initial clinical series of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma associated with level I renal vein thrombus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: At our 2 institutions 8 patients each underwent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for level I microscopic renal vein thrombus (group 1) and level I gross thrombus (group 2). In all 8 group 2 patients the level I thrombus was preoperatively diagnosed by computerized tomography. Mean renal tumor size in groups 1 and 2 was 7.8 and 12.4 cm., respectively. After controlling the renal artery the renal vein was secured by firing an endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomosis stapler on its collapsed, uninvolved proximal part adjacent to the vena cava. Intraoperative, postoperative and pathological parameters were assessed in the 2 groups. RESULTS: In group 1 laparoscopic radical nephrectomy was technically successful in all 8 patients. Mean operative time was 3.1 hours, mean estimated blood loss was 382 cc and mean hospital stay was 1.9 days. In 1 patient each a soft tissue and a vascular margin was positive for cancer. At a mean follow up of 19.5 months (range 2 to 36) metastatic disease occurred in 3 cases (38%). In group 2 laparoscopic radical nephrectomy was technically successful in 7 cases with open conversion in 1. Mean operative time was 3.3 hours, mean estimated blood loss was 354 cc and mean hospital stay was 2.3 days. Surgical soft tissue and the renal vein vascular margin of the transected vein were negative for cancer in all 8 cases. At a mean followup of 9.4 months (range 5 to 16) pulmonary metastasis developed in 1 patient (13%). CONCLUSIONS: Although it is an advanced procedure, laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in patients with level I renal vein thrombus is feasible, safe and follows established oncological principles.     

不同分级肾静脉瘤栓后腹腔镜左肾癌根治术的可行性

目的：探讨左肾癌伴有不同分级肾静脉瘤栓患者经后腹腔途径腹腔镜左肾癌根治术的可行性。方法：7例左肾占位伴左肾静脉瘤栓患者,增强CT显示7例肿物不均匀强化,并伴有。肾静脉内充盈缺损,均在全麻下行后腹腔镜左肾癌根治术。术中放置4个穿刺套管针,游离腹主动脉和肾动脉后,Hem-o-lok结扎切断。肾动脉,游离肾静脉后判断7例瘤栓均为非附壁瘤栓,上托肾脏,于肾静脉近下腔静脉处Hem—O—lok结扎切断。肾静脉,完整切除肾脏及瘤栓。我们根据左。肾静脉瘤栓长度进行分级,讨论不同分级患者手术难点及可行性。结果：7例手术均获成功,术后恢复良好。病理诊断为肾透明细胞癌6例,嫌色细胞癌1例。术后随访8个月（1～18个月）,未见肿瘤复发和转移。结论：对于选择性病例伴有不同分级的肾静脉瘤栓的左肾癌行经后腹腔途径腹腔镜左肾癌根治术可行,但随瘤栓分级增加手术难度增大。     

腹腔镜治疗肾错构瘤并肾静脉及下腔静脉瘤栓1例并文献复习

目的：探讨全腹腔镜治疗肾错构瘤并肾静脉及下腔静脉瘤栓的可行性分析。方法：回顾性分析1例腹腔镜治疗肾错构瘤并肾静脉及下腔静脉瘤栓患者的临床资料。患者,女,26岁,体检时发现右肾占位,B超示右肾窦内可见5．1cm×2．7cm高回声占位,边界欠规则,内见血流。CT示右肾盂旁可见一不规则团块状混杂密度影,大小为4．5cm×2．9cm×1．9cm,可见脂肪成分,最低密度-40HU;病变软组织部分明显强化,增强前后CT值分别为31HU和97HU,病变主要位于肾窦,部分延伸至肾静脉及腔静脉内。检索Pubmed和CBM数据库相关文献进行复习。结果：患者在全麻下行腹腔镜右肾切除及肾静脉、下腔静脉取栓术,瘤栓进入下腔静脉0．6cm。病理诊断右肾错构瘤。术后随访6个月无肿瘤复发和转移。结论：肾错构瘤并。肾静脉及下腔静脉瘤栓临床罕见,对选择性病例行腹腔镜肾切除并行肾静脉及下腔静脉取栓术安全可行。     

Adrenocortical carcinoma extending into the inferior vena cava in a patient with right kidney agenesis: Surgical approach and review of literature

INTRODUCTIONAdrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignancy with a poor prognosis and the association with tumor thrombus into the inferior vena cava (IVC) is not common. The best treatment is represented by radical surgery.PRESENTATION OF CASEWe describe a case of a large ACC of the left adrenal gland extending into the IVC through the left renal vein in a young patient with agenesis of the right kidney and signs of acute renal failure. A midline laparotomy was performed, subsequently extended by a left thoracophrenotomy through the 7th intercostal space in order to control the proximal surface of the mass and the thoracic aorta. The tumor was completely excised preserving the kidney, and thrombectomy was performed by a cavotomy with a temporary caval clamping, without cardiopulmonary by-pass (CPB).DISCUSSIONWe discuss surgical approaches reported in literature in case of ACC with intracaval extension. The tumor must be completely resected and the thrombectomy can be performed by different approaches: cavotomy with direct suture, partial resection of caval wall without reconstruction, resection of vena cava with graft reconstruction. These procedures could require a CPB, with an increased mortality. In our case we preserved the kidney and a thrombectomy without CPB was performed.CONCLUSIONIntracaval extension of ACC does not represent a contraindication to surgery. The best treatment of intracaval thrombus should be the cavotomy with direct suture. The CPB is not always required. In presence of renal agenesis, the preservation of the kidney is mandatory.     

Recidive of renal cell carcinoma tumor thrombus in inferior vena cava via lumbar vein

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) develops tumor thrombus in the renal vein and inferior vena cava (IVC) in 10% of cases. Surgical treatment is radical nephrectomy and thrombectomy of the IVC. Local recidive can develop in the lumbar fossa, lymph nodes, and the IVC. We report a 58-year-old patient admitted to the Clinic for Urology at the Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia, in February 2009 with RCC of the left kidney and tumor thrombus in the IVC. After ultrasonography exam and multislice computed tomography scan, we performed radical nephrectomy and thrombectomy of the IVC (level II). Four months after the operation, ultrasound exam and cavography showed intracaval and paracaval recidive tumor masses in the renal part of the IVC. On operation we removed intraluminal IVC thrombus, which arises from the lumbar vein on the IVC posterior wall, with paracaval thrombus in the lumbar vein. We conclude that RCC tumor thrombus can spread from the kidney to the IVC through the lumbar vein.     

The use of intraoperative ultrasound in laparoscopic adrenal surgery

Background: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy has been shown to be a safe and effective therapy for benign adrenal lesions. We review our experience with this procedure, including the use of laparoscopic ultrasound. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our experience with 36 patients who underwent resection of 42 adrenal glands. Data gathered included preoperative evaluation and diagnosis, operative time, blood loss, complications, and follow-up status. Laparoscopic ultrasound was used to guide dissection and characterize a variety of adrenal lesions. Results: Thirty-five of 36 patients underwent successful laparoscopic adrenalectomy. There was one conversion to the open procedure in a patient with bilateral adrenal metastases from an endometrial cancer. For the bilateral laparoscopic procedure, the operative time averaged 262 mins, blood loss was 160 cc, and hospital stay was 3.0 days. For unilateral cases, operative time averaged 193 min, blood loss was 108 cc, and hospitalization was 1.1 days. Six patients experienced perioperative complications, most of which were minor and transient. Laparoscopic ultrasound was useful to define anatomy and to identify the adrenal vein, especially on the left side. Conclusions: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is the procedure of choice for benign adrenal disease. Laparoscopic ultrasound is useful to localize and aid in the dissection of the left adrenal vein. Received: 24 December 1998/Accepted: 12 February 1999     

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for primary and secondary malignant adrenal tumors

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is unanimously recognized as the gold standard for the treatment of adrenal tumors, but it is not indicated for tumors of any size when invasion of the surrounding tissues is clearly detected by preoperative imaging. Although laparoscopic adrenalectomy for metastatic adrenal malignancy is a feasible procedure, in the case of primary adrenal malignancy, it should be done very carefully. When laparoscopic surgery is performed for adrenal tumors >6 cm or for tumors that are considered potentially malignant after preoperative imaging or endocrine studies, the operation should be performed only by a highly skilled laparoscopic surgeon. It is also important to inform the patient and family that the tumors may be malignant and that conversion to open surgery could be necessary. The surgeon must create a sufficiently wide working space, remove the tumor and surrounding fat en bloc, and never grasp the tumor or adrenal tissue. The ultrasonically activated scalpel or ultrasonic endoaspirator should be carefully handled so that it does not touch the tumor surface because this will create a risk of tumor-cell dissemination. It also is essential not to persist unreasonably with laparoscopic procedures but to switch immediately to open surgery when laparoscopic surgery becomes difficult.     

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for large adrenal metastasis from contralateral renal cell carcinoma.

We present herein the case of a patient with solitary metachronous contralateral adrenal metastasis from renal cell cancer. The patient had undergone left radical nephrectomy and adrenalectomy for localized renal cancer 7 years previously. Laparoscopic transperitoneal right adrenalectomy was performed. The postoperative period was uneventful. Histology showed right adrenal metastasis from renal cancer. At 6-month follow-up, there was no evidence of recurrence.     

Laparoscopic ultrasound imaging of adrenal tumors during laparoscopic adrenalectomy

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the usefulness of laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) during laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) and to define the ultrasound imaging characteristics of various adrenal tumors. METHODS: LUS was utilized in 27 patients who underwent LA (including one bilateral adrenalectomy) from May 1994 to October 1998. Tumor size ranged from 1.0 to 5.5 cm (mean 3.3 cm), and a transabdominal lateral approach to LA was used. RESULTS: LUS localized the adrenal gland and tumor in all 28 adrenalectomies and demonstrated the relationship of the tumor to the kidney and adjacent vascular structures (renal artery/vein and inferior vena cava). The adrenal vein was visualized sonographically in only six cases (21 %). Pheochromocytomas were mild to markedly heterogenous, whereas most aldosteronomas and cortical adenomas were homogenous. LUS provided useful information to the surgeon in 11 of 28 cases (39%) by: 1) localizing the adrenal gland and tumor and/or guiding the dissection; 2) demonstrating that tumors > or =4 cm were confined to the adrenal gland; and 3) investigating suspected pathology in other organs. Mean operating time for LUS was 10.9 min (range 5 to 24 min) and calculated hospital charges were $602. CONCLUSIONS: LUS accurately localizes adrenal tumors, helps define their relationship to adjacent structures, and provides confirmation that larger tumors are amenable to laparoscopic resection. LUS is a useful adjunct to laparoscopic adrenalectomy in selected patients.     

Laparoscopic retroperitoneal adrenalectomy

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy has largely replaced open adrenalectomy for resection of adrenal tumors, which are not adrenocortical cancer or malignant pheochromocytoma. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal adrenalectomy is a particularly useful technique in patients with tumors <7 cm and body mass index <45 kg/m2. When compared with laparoscopic transabdominal adrenalectomy, the laparoscopic retroperitoneal technique leads to reduced operating times, avoidance of intra-abdominal adhesions and irradiated fields, potentially less postoperative pain, and improved intraoperative hemostasis and visualization. The technique involves placement of 3 ports, dissecting the retroperitoneal space, identifying and ligating the adrenal vein, and removing the attachments to the adrenal gland. See the video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/SLE/A38.