首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 62 毫秒
1.
Summary.  Pilot studies have suggested that the addition of amantadine to interferon (IFN) is effective against hepatitis C virus (HCV). Furthermore, IFN induction therapy seems to improve virological response rates. In this open, randomized, multicentre trial we compared safety and efficacy of a triple therapy comprising IFN α 2a, ribavirin and amantadine using high induction doses (6 MU IFN α daily for the first 6 weeks) against a therapy with standard IFN α dosages over the entire treatment period plus amantadine and ribavirin. A total of 158 naive patients with chronic HCV infection were randomized 1:1. Group A ( n  = 81): induction therapy with 6 MU IFN α daily for 6 weeks, followed by 6 MU three times a week (tiw) for 18 weeks and then 3 MU tiw until week 48. Group B ( n  = 77): standard therapy with 6 MU IFN α tiw for 24 weeks, followed by 3 MU until week 48. All patients received oral ribavirin (10 mg/kg/day) and amantadine (200 mg/day). The triple therapy was safe and well tolerated. There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to biochemical response rates. Groups A and B did not differ in virological response rates at the end of treatment (33% vs 35%) or at the end of the 6 month follow up period (37% vs 39%). We could not detect favourable effects on sustained virological response rates using induction therapy, in either genotype 1 or non-1 infected patients. In summary, induction therapy with 6 MU IFN α daily did not result in increased overall response rates compared with standard IFN α dosages of 6 MU tiw.  相似文献   

2.
Background/Aims: We compared the efficacy and safety of the combined therapy of daily interferon α-2b and ribavirin with those of interferon α-2b three times per week alone or in combination with ribavirin in non-responder patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.Methods: A total of 376 patients were randomly assigned to receive interferon α-2b (6 MU three times per week for 24 weeks followed by 3 MU three times per week for 24 weeks) alone (group A) or in combination with ribavirin for 48 weeks (group B), or daily interferon α-2b (3 MU per day for 24 weeks followed by 3 MU three times per week for 24 weeks) and ribavirin (group C).Results: After 24 weeks of therapy, HCV RNA was undetectable in 11.7, 24.0, and 37.8% for groups A, B, and C, respectively. Sustained virological response was more frequent in patients who received combination therapy with three times weekly interferon (20.9%) or daily interferon (26.0%) than in patients who received interferon alone (5.8%) (P<0.001). The predictive HCV parameters for sustained response were a low viral load on day 7 and a negative HCV RNA on week 12.Conclusions: In conclusion, in non-responder patients with chronic hepatitis C, virological response with daily interferon and ribavirin, compared to interferon monotherapy, was significantly improved during treatment, although sustained virological response was similar for both combination therapies with ribavirin and three times a week or daily interferon.  相似文献   

3.
Adinolfi LE  Utili R  Tonziello A  Ruggiero G 《Gut》2003,52(5):701-705
BACKGROUND: Fifty per cent of chronic hepatitis C patients are non-responders to interferon. At present, there are no recommended therapeutic options for non-responders. AIMS: The safety and long term effect of alpha interferon induction plus ribavirin with or without amantadine in the treatment of interferon non-responsive chronic hepatitis C was evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 114 consecutive patients were randomly divided into three groups with a final 2:2:1 ratio: group A (44 patients) received interferon alfa 2b, 3 million units (MU), three times a week, and oral ribavirin (1000 mg/day); group B (46 patients) received interferon 3 MU daily for the first four weeks and subsequently 3 MU three times a week, and ribavirin as in regimen A; and group C (24 patients) received interferon and ribavirin as in regimen B, plus oral amantadine hydrochloride (200 mg/day). The duration of treatment was 12 months. RESULTS: The end of treatment response for groups A and B was 25% and 29%, respectively, and for group C, 68% (p<0.005). At the end of one year of follow up, a sustained response was observed for six (25%) patients in group C, one (2%) patient in group A, and two (4%) patients in group B (p<0.002). The triple regimen was well tolerated and did not increase the frequency or severity of side effects. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates that for the treatment of interferon non-responder hepatitis C patients, the association of interferon-ribavirin has a negligible long term effect whereas a triple regimen including interferon, ribavirin, and amantadine can be an effective and safe treatment.  相似文献   

4.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: We compared the efficacy and safety of the combined therapy of daily interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin with those of interferon alpha-2b three times per week alone or in combination with ribavirin in non-responder patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.METHODS: A total of 376 patients were randomly assigned to receive interferon alpha-2b (6 MU three times per week for 24 weeks followed by 3 MU three times per week for 24 weeks) alone (group A) or in combination with ribavirin for 48 weeks (group B), or daily interferon alpha-2b (3 MU per day for 24 weeks followed by 3 MU three times per week for 24 weeks) and ribavirin (group C).RESULTS: After 24 weeks of therapy, HCV RNA was undetectable in 11.7, 24.0, and 37.8% for groups A, B, and C, respectively. Sustained virological response was more frequent in patients who received combination therapy with three times weekly interferon (20.9%) or daily interferon (26.0%) than in patients who received interferon alone (5.8%) (P<0.001). The predictive HCV parameters for sustained response were a low viral load on day 7 and a negative HCV RNA on week 12.CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, in non-responder patients with chronic hepatitis C, virological response with daily interferon and ribavirin, compared to interferon monotherapy, was significantly improved during treatment, although sustained virological response was similar for both combination therapies with ribavirin and three times a week or daily interferon.  相似文献   

5.
summary.  Retreatment of relapser patients with chronic hepatitis C with the standard dose of interferon (IFN) of 3 million units (MU) thrice weekly (tiw) plus ribavirin for 24 weeks achieves a sustained response in 30 and 73% of patients with genotype 1 and 2 or 3, respectively. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IFN α -2b induction therapy, followed by prolonged treatment with a high dose of IFN α -2b plus ribavirin in relapser patients. A total of 119 patients were randomized to receive IFN α -2b 5 MU daily (Group A: 59 patients) or IFN α -2b 5 MU tiw (Group B: 60 patients) for 4 weeks followed by IFN (5 MU tiw) and ribavirin (1000–1200 mg/day) for 48 weeks in both groups. The primary end point was hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA clearance at week 24 after the end of treatment. A sustained virological response (SVR) was achieved in 68 and 60% of Group A and B patients, respectively ( P  = 0.37). Logistic regression analysis identified genotype 2 or 3 as the only independent factor associated with response, whereas induction regimen and baseline viraemia levels did not affect the response. The overall SVR was 53 and 72% in patients with genotype 1 or 4 and 2 or 3, respectively. In conclusion, induction IFN therapy does not enhance the SVR to a 48-week combination therapy. Our study suggests that relapsed patients with genotype 1 or 4 may achieve significant response rates of approximately 50%, if retreated with 5 MU tiw IFN plus ribavirin for 48 weeks.  相似文献   

6.
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate an alternative treatment (consensus interferon plus ribavirin) for chronic hepatitis C patients resistant to combined therapy. Methods: Fourteen patients previously resistant to interferon alpha plus ribavirin were consecutively assigned to receive 15 μg of consensus interferon plus ribavirin (1000 mg) daily for 4 weeks, and 9–15 μg every other day plus daily ribavirin for the following 44 weeks. Alanine aminotransferase and hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA (Amplicor Monitor; Roche) levels were monitored during therapy and for 24 weeks after its completion. Results: A rapid and marked decrease of HCV RNA viremia of more than 2 logs was observed in 10 (71%) of 14 patients at week 2 of treatment. At the end of therapy, 10 (71%) of 14 patients had undetectable HCV RNA. The end-of-treatment response rates were 6 of 9 (67%) patients for genotype 1 and 4 of 5 (80%) for other genotypes. Sustained response was observed in 4 (36%) of 11 patients who completed 24 weeks of follow-up. Conclusions: A marked and rapid decrease of viral load was observed during therapy with high doses of consensus interferon plus ribavirin in patients previously resistant to combined therapy, even in those infected with genotype 1. Of 11 patients who completed the post-treatment follow-up, 36% presented a sustained response. Received July 23, 2001 / Accepted: January 25, 2002 Reprint requests to: S.K. Ono-Nita Editorial on page 766  相似文献   

7.
Background/aims: Initial high‐dose interferon‐α induction therapy in combination with ribavirin improves sustained response rates in treatment‐naïve patients. This prospective, randomized, controlled study tested whether non‐responders or relapsers to interferon monotherapy also benefit from induction therapy. Methods: Patients with chronic hepatitis C who had not responded to (n=75) or relapsed (n=80) after previous interferon therapy were randomized to receive three different interferon doses during the first 14 weeks of therapy (A: 10 MU IntronA®/day for 2 weeks, followed by 10 MU/2 days for 12 weeks; B:5 MU/d for 14 weeks; C: 5 MU/2 days for 14 weeks) followed in all by 5 MU/2 days for 24 weeks. All patients received 1–1.2 g ribavirin/day throughout the whole study. Results: The rates of viral clearance at any time on treatment were similar in all groups. Sustained response rates were also not different among the groups in interferon nonresponders (A 32%, B 29%, C 31%) and relapsers (A 64%, B 68%, C 71%), respectively, as well as in patients with different genotypes. As expected, sustained response rates were higher in patients with genotype non‐1 than in those with genotype 1. Conclusion: High‐dose induction therapy does not improve the outcome of interferon/ribavirin therapy in interferon nonresponders or relapsers.  相似文献   

8.
Ribavirin plus interferon-alpha (IFN alpha) combination has led to a marked advance in the treatment of IFN alpha-naive or relapser patients with chronic hepatitis C but was shown to be only marginally effective in IFN alpha-nonresponders. We therefore conducted a pilot study to see whether an intensified treatment protocol might be more effective in inducing a virological response in patients who had not responded virologically to previous IFN alpha monotherapy. 14 nonresponder patients with histologically proven chronic hepatitis C were included in the study. Patients received 9 MU IFN alpha-2a daily for one week followed by 9 MU IFN alpha every second day for further 5 weeks. With the beginning of the seventh week, patients were treated with 6 MU IFN alpha thrice in week (tiw) for a period of 6 weeks (until week 12). IFN alpha was continued up to 48 weeks at a dose of 3 MU IFN alpha tiw. Ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/day) and amantadine sulphate (200 mg/day) was given orally for 48 weeks. One patient discontinued therapy after first IFN alpha injection and one other patient after 12 weeks of therapy because of side effects. The remaining 12 patients completed treatment according to the protocol. An initial virological response at week 24 was achieved in 2 of the 14 patients (14%) and both patients remained HCV RNA negative at the end of treatment. However, both patients relapsed 4 weeks after completion of therapy, and therefore none of the patients achieved a virological sustained response. Viral dynamics studies showed a marked decline in hepatitis C viremia during the first 6 weeks of high-dose IFN alpha. After IFN alpha dose reduction, however, viremia stabilized or increased in most patients. These data indicate, that even triple therapy with high-dose IFN alpha plus ribavirin and amantadine fails to improve significantly the response rates in IFN alpha-nonresponders.  相似文献   

9.
Standard therapies for the treatment of hepatitis C are ineffective in almost 50% of patients. Amantadine is an antiviral agent that may have activity against hepatitis C virus. In this pilot study, we evaluated the efficacy of a combination of interferon, ribavirin, and amantadine in patients with chronic hepatitis C who had previously failed 6–12 months of treatment with interferon and ribavirin. In this prospective open-label study, 23 patients were treated with a combination of interferon-2b 3 million units subcutaneously three times per week, ribavirin 1000–1200 mg daily, and amantadine 100 mg twice daily for 6–12 months. Treatment was discontinued at 6 months if the patients had detectable HCV RNA by PCR. All patients were followed for 6 months after the completion of treatment. At the end of treatment, the biochemical response was 47% and the virological response was 30%. However, the rate of sustained virological response was only 13% (3/23). There were no unexpected side effects with triple therapy. In conclusion, triple therapy with interferon, ribavirin and amantadine resulted in a low sustained viral clearance in chronic hepatitis C patients who had previously failed interferon and ribavirin combination therapy.  相似文献   

10.
Abstract: Background: Combination therapy with interferon alpha (IFNα) plus ribavirin has been shown to improve the sustained response rate in patients with chronic hepatitis C but there is little information regarding the lengths of time for this therapeutic regimen. In this study we therefore tried to evaluate whether the analysis of different virological parameters could provide new clues with respect to the early determination of the efficacy of this form of combination therapy. Furthermore, we also examined whether short‐term induction combination therapy followed by IFNα alone is more effective than monotherapy in mounting an initial as well as a sustained virological response. Methods: 185 patients with histologically proven chronic hepatitis C (mean age 42 years (range 19–65 years); 110 males, 75 females) were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to receive, over the first 12 weeks, either interferon alpha 2a 6 million units (MU) three times weekly plus ribavirin 14 mg/kg per day (n=93) or the same dose of IFNα alone (n=92). Patients with a virological response (serum HCV RNA undetectable) after 12 weeks were subsequently treated with 3 MU IFNα alone thrice weekly for a further 40 weeks. Otherwise, treatment was discontinued. After the end of treatment, patients were followed up for 24 weeks. Results: Patient characteristics at baseline were not significantly different in the two treatment groups. An initial virological response at week 12 was seen in 61 (66%) patients receiving IFNα plus ribavirin and in 44 (48%) being treated with IFNα alone (p=0.015) and this improvement in the response rate was mainly restricted to HCV genotype 1‐infected patients (58% vs. 38%). In contrast, end‐of‐treatment (week 52) and sustained virological response rates were similar in both groups (37% vs. 29% and 26% vs. 17% [p=0.1], respectively). Interestingly, patients with HCV genotype 3, however, clearly benefited from short‐term combination therapy. Thus, sustained virological response rates in these patients significantly increased from 25% (IFNα monotherapy) to 59% (combination therapy) (p=0.05). Conclusions: Short‐term combined therapy for 12 weeks is more effective than the monotherapy with respect to the induction of an initial virological response but this effect applies only to genotype 1‐infected patients. However, there is no significant difference between both therapeutic schedules with regard to the induction of sustained response. Although HCV genotype 3‐infected patients seem to benefit from this short‐term combined therapy, prolonged combined therapy may be necessary in HCV genotype 1‐infected patients.  相似文献   

11.
Mixed cryoglobulins are detected in 50% of patients with hepatitis C; fortunately, few have vasculitis affecting skin, peripheral nerves, kidneys, and synovia. This study was designed to identify the natural history of symptomatic cryoglobulinemia and evaluate the response to antiviral therapy. Patients with hepatitis C complicated by symptomatic cryoglobulinemia were assessed for their disease manifestations and response to antiviral therapy. Of 83 patients identified, 56 patients with a minimum of 12 months follow-up were reviewed. Manifestations included dermatologic (75%), rheumatologic (57%), neurologic (34%), and renal (proteinuria 25%). Antiviral therapy was given to 38, of whom 9 were retreated for symptomatic and/or virological nonresponse. Antiviral therapy included interferon monotherapy (n= 8), pegylated-interferon monotherapy (n= 5), consensus-interferon (n= 2), interferon + ribavirin (n= 18), and pegylated-interferon + ribavirin (n= 14). Treatment provided sustained symptomatic response in 31 (82%) and virological response in 16 (42%) patients. Symptomatic cryoglobulinemia responds well to antiviral therapy, even when virological response is not achieved.  相似文献   

12.
The benefit of the triple therapy (interferon + amantadine + ribavirim) is still unknown. The efficacy of induction doses of interferon-alpha-2a monotherapy or in combination with ribavirin and/or amantadine was evaluated in interferon non-responders with chronic hepatitis C. A total of 378 patients were randomized. All the groups received the same doses and duration of interferon-alpha-2a: (i) interferon 9 MUI/day for 4 weeks and then 3 MUI/3 t.i.w. for 44 weeks (n = 53); (ii) interferon in combination with amantadine 100 mg twice daily for 48 weeks (n = 111); (iii) interferon in combination with ribavirin 1000-1200 mg (n = 106); (iv) interferon in combination with amantadine and ribavirin (n = 108). Baseline parameters were similar in the four groups. Sustained virological and biochemical responses were 13%, 6%, 18% and 22% respectively. No significant differences were found between double ribavirin arm vs triple therapy, but the difference was significant between interferon-amantadine (P = 0.008) and triple therapy (P = 0.0005). Hence, the induction doses of interferon in combination with ribavirin or ribavirin plus amantadine showed encouraging results in patients with chronic hepatitis C who were resistant to interferon. However, triple therapy is not superior to double.  相似文献   

13.
Less than 10% of patients with chronic hepatitis C infected with genotype 1 achieve a sustained response with 12 months of interferon therapy. Viral kinetics studies have shown that HCV may replicate in less than 24 hr, generating over 1012 copies per day and suggesting the need for more aggressive therapy. The aim of the study was to determine the effect of a higher and daily dosage of IFN-2b plus ribavirin on the viral load and on the response rate in patients infected by genotype 1 and previous nonresponders to interferon. Ten patients with chronic hepatitis C infected with genotype 1 were allocated to receive IFN-2b, 5 MU daily or three times a week for four weeks followed by 5 MU three times a week until week 24 plus ribavirin for the entire period. At week 4 of therapy, a 2 log reduction in HCV RNA levels was achieved in three (60%) patients in the daily group and in one (20%) patient in the three times a week group. At week 24, HCV RNA was negative in four of the five patients in the three times a week group, and three of the four patients in the daily group had a virological response. However, in follow-up, none of these patients experienced a sustained response. The safety of and ability to tolerate the combination therapy was good, anemia being the most common adverse effect. In conclusion, patients previously not responding to interferon achieved a greater virological reduction early in combination therapy compared to a three times a week interferon schedule. However, the virological response at the end of therapy was similar between the two regimens, and no sustained response was observed in any of the treatment groups.  相似文献   

14.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: To determine whether addition of amantadine to pegylated interferon/ribavirin improved response rates among chronic hepatitis C patients, non-responders to interferon/ribavirin and study the dynamic of response. METHODS: In a double blind, multicenter, randomized trial, 200 non-responder patients received pegylated interferon 1.5 microg/kg per week and ribavirin 800-1200 mg/day, plus either amantadine 200 mg/day or placebo for 48 weeks. Endpoints were virological responses, ALT normalization, and histological benefit overtime. RESULTS: Twenty percent of all patients achieved a sustained virological response (SVR). This rate was 8% higher in the triple therapy group (24%) compared with the double therapy group (16%) (P = 0.22). A better virological response rate at week 24 was observed in the triple regimen group (43 vs 29%; P = 0.06), which was lost at week 48 suggesting viral escape. The biochemical response rate was also significantly higher with triple therapy at week 12 (63 vs 49%; P = 0.05) and week 24 (64 vs 49%; P = 0.03). Fibrosis stabilized or improved in 77% of all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Re-treatment of interferon/ribavirin non-responder patients should be encouraged since a substantial proportion benefits from re-treatment with pegylated interferon/ribavirin +/- amantadine. In triple therapy involving amantadine, a time wise response and an increased SVR rate in subgroups less prone to viral breakthrough suggest clues for existing controversies.  相似文献   

15.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of amantadine in combination with interferon in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. METHODS: Multi-centre trial including 180 chronic hepatitis C patients without cirrhosis, randomly enrolled to receive interferon 6 MU every other day for 6 months followed by 3 MU for further 6 months (group A, 90 patients), or the same schedule plus amantadine 200 mg/day (group B, 90 patients). Primary end-point was a sustained virological and biochemical response, secondary end-points were on-treatment (third month) and end-of-treatment response rates. RESULTS: The two groups had similar demographic, biochemical and virological characteristics. A sustained response after 6 months follow-up was observed in 17% of group A and 24% of group B patients (P not significant), an end-of-treatment response was observed in 37% in group A and 47% in group B (P not significant), an on-treatment response was observed in 46% in group A and 61% in group B patients (P < 0.05). No major side effects due to amantadine administration were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Adding amantadine to interferon did not improve the sustained treatment efficacy. However, the rate of early response at the third month of therapy was significantly higher in the combination therapy group.  相似文献   

16.
OBJECTIVE: Interferon combined with ribavirin has efficacy in the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, its utility in patients who have not responded to prior interferon therapy is not clear. Furthermore, the effect of using an increased dose of interferon in combination with ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C resistant to conventional doses of interferon is not known. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of high-dose interferon in combination with ribavirin on the efficacy of treating patients with chronic hepatitis C resistant to interferon monotherapy in a large multicenter trial. METHODS: We randomized 154 patients with chronic hepatitis C who failed to achieve a sustained response with prior interferon therapy to receive either 3 or 5 MU of interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/day) for 12 months. There were 119 patients who had not responded and 35 who initially responded but relapsed after prior interferon monotherapy. Serum HCV RNA levels were measured at entry, 6, and 12 months of treatment and at the end of a 6-month follow-up period. RESULTS: The mean age of the subjects was 47 yr (range 28-68 yr), and 110 (71.4%) were men. One hundred thirty-two patients (86%) had HCV genotype 1, whereas 21 (14%) had cirrhosis. Eighty-one subjects (53%) were randomized to receive 3 MU of interferon alpha-2b. Fifteen of 35 relapse subjects (43%) and 12 of 119 prior nonresponder entrants (10%) achieved a sustained virological response to the 12-month course of treatment. Overall, 11 of 81 patients (14%) receiving 3 MU, and 16 of 73 patients (22%) receiving 5 MU of interferon maintained an undetectable HCV RNA level after cessation of therapy. The difference in sustained response rates between the two interferon dosage groups did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.09). However, among the nonresponder patients alone, there was an increased sustained response in the high-dose interferon group compared with the standard interferon dose group (15.5% vs 4.9%, p = 0.055). Twenty-six patients discontinued therapy before 6 months, including 10 patients (12.3%) in the 3-MU and 16 patients (21.9%) in the 5-MU groups (p = 0.17). CONCLUSIONS: Sustained virological response to combined interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin was significantly higher in relapse patients than those who did not respond to prior interferon monotherapy. Although, when all treated patients were analyzed, there was no significant difference in sustained response between subjects receiving 3 and 5 MU of interferon, among the prior nonresponder patients, treatment with 5 MU of interferon with ribavirin resulted in a slightly increased response compared with treatment with the standard interferon dosage. The tolerability of the treatment regimens was comparable.  相似文献   

17.
Aims: We previously reported the potential effect of combination therapy of an initial high‐dose interferon (IFN) and amantadine on the eradication of HCV‐RNA in patients with chronic hepatitis C. The additive effects of amantadine on interferon and ribavirin combination therapy remain controversial. In this study we investigated the efficacy of initial high‐dose IFN with ribavirin and amantadine on the virological response in patients with chronic hepatitis C with a high viral load of genotype 1b. Methods: Twenty‐two patients with high viral loads of genotype 1b hepatitis C virus were enrolled in this pilot study. Patients were administered IFN‐beta for four weeks and then IFN‐alpha2b for 22 weeks with daily oral administration of ribavirin and amantadine. Results: A sustained virological response (SVR) was shown in 31.8% (seven of 22 patients). With the naïve patients, the SVR rate was 21.4% (three of 14 patients). In patients who could not eradicate HCV‐RNA by previous IFN monotherapy, the SVR rate was 50% (four of eight patients). Conclusion: Triple therapy with an initial high dose of IFN with ribavirin and amantadine may be effective, especially for chronic hepatitis C IFN‐retreatment patients with a high viral load of genotype 1b.  相似文献   

18.
Ten patients with interferon-nonresponsive chronic hepatitis C were treated with high-dose interferon-2b (IFN-2b; 20 MU/day for two days, then 3 MU/day for 24 weeks, followed by 3 MU three times weekly for 24 more weeks) plus ribavirin (1000–1200 mg/day). End-of-treatment virologic responses occurred in 50% of cases and sustained virologic responses in 37.5%. Hepatitis C virus RNA decreased significantly (2.15 logs; P < 0.0001) after the two 20-MU interferon doses but rebounded when the interferon dose was lowered to 3 MU/day. Thereafter, hepatitis C virus RNA showed a progressive, significant decrease, most notably at week 10 (3.3 logs; P = 0.001). Patients with a sustained response exhibited a more pronounced hepatitis C virus RNA decrease, especially from weeks 3 to 8 (P = 0.036). Two patients discontinued therapy because of adverse events, and one patient required a ribavirin dose reduction. Retreatment with an initial high-dose IFN-2b plus ribavirin significantly reduces viral load in genotype 1-infected, interferon-nonresponsive patients.  相似文献   

19.
Aim: This study aimed to clarify the factors associated the efficacy of re‐treatment with pegylated interferon (PEG IFN) plus ribavirin combination therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C who had failed to respond to previous treatment. Methods: One hundred and forty‐three patients who had previously shown relapse (n = 79), non‐response (n = 34) or intolerance (n = 30) to PEG IFN plus ribavirin were re‐treated with PEG IFN plus ribavirin. Results: Twenty‐five patients with intolerance to previous treatment completed re‐treatment and the sustained virological response (SVR) rates were 55% and 80% for hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 and 2, respectively. On re‐treatment of the 113 patients who completed the previous treatment, the SVR rates were 48% and 63% for genotype 1 and 2, respectively. Relapse after previous treatment and a low baseline HCV RNA level on re‐treatment were associated with SVR in genotype 1 (P < 0.001). Patients with the interleukin‐28B major genotype responded significantly better and earlier to re‐treatment, but the difference in the SVR rate did not reach a significant level between the major and minor genotypes (P = 0.09). Extended treatment of 72 weeks raised the SVR rate among the patients who attained complete early virological response but not rapid virological response with re‐treatment (72 weeks, 73%, 16/22, vs 48 weeks, 38%, 5/13, P < 0.05). Conclusion: Relapse after previous treatment and a low baseline HCV RNA level have predictive values for a favorable response of PEG IFN plus ribavirin re‐treatment for HCV genotype 1 patients. Re‐treatment for 72 weeks may lead to clinical improvement for genotype 1 patients with complete early virological response and without rapid virological response on re‐treatment.  相似文献   

20.
Abstract: Background: More than 70% of patients with chronic hepatitis C are resistant to interferon therapy. Ribavirin, in association with interferon, has been demonstrated as effective, at a dose of 800–1200 mg/day, but the efficacy of a lower dose has not been established. Methods: We assessed the effectiveness of the combination of 600mg/day of ribavirin plus 3 MU of interferon over a period of 6 months, in a group of patients previously resistant to interferon. Sixty-two patients with chronic hepatitis C with serum and hepatic HCV RNA relapsers or non-responders to interferon, were randomly divided into two groups: group A received 3 MU of interferon alpha-2b, three times a week for 6 months; group B was given the same dose plus 600 mg per day of ribavirin for 6 months. Two patients from each group dropped from therapy. One patient from group A and two from group B withdrew from treatment because of adverse effects. Results: Mean alanine aminotransferase levels were similar in both groups throughout the study. A sustained response was observed in 7% and 7.4% of groups A and B with short-term response in 39% and 59%, and no response in 54% and 34% from both groups respectively (nonsignificant). At 12 months, 4 and 7 patients from groups A and B respectively, cleared serum HCV RNA however, only one sustained responder from each group cleared HCV RNA from peripheral blood mononuclear cells. At 18 months, 3 patients remained serum HCV RNA negative. Adverse effects were similar. Only haemoglobin values were lower in group B in the first month of therapy (p<0.05). Conclusion: In conclusion, the combination of 3 MU of interferon plus 600 mg of ribavirin is not effective in chronic hepatitis C resistant to interferon.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号