Implications of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms on surgical workload

BACKGROUND: The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) provided strong evidence for both the clinical benefit and the cost-effectiveness of a screening programme for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) in men. If a national screening programme for AAA were adopted in the UK, it would be expected to increase the elective and decrease the emergency surgical workload. METHODS: The MASS trial randomized 67,800 men aged 65-74 years to be invited to attend for ultrasonographic screening for AAA or to a control group that received no invitation. Predictions of elective and emergency surgical workload were made for a 20-year interval after the introduction of a screening programme for 65-year-old men, based on surgical rates observed in the MASS trial and national mortality statistics. RESULTS: For a district general hospital serving a population of 400,000, there was an estimated reduction from nine emergency operations per year before introduction of the screening programme to three emergency operations annually in men aged 65 years and over by the end of the 20-year interval, and an increase from 24 to 43 AAA operations overall. The corresponding estimated annual costs for all AAA surgery increased by 47 per cent, from pound 209,000 to pound 308,000. These results were not affected by changes in the underlying assumptions. CONCLUSION: The results support the expectation of very few emergency operations, and principally elective operations, being performed following the introduction of a screening programme. For a typical district general hospital, a screening programme would be expected to lead to two additional elective AAA operations per month, and to save 11 AAA-related deaths per year.     

Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms based on five year results from a randomised hospital based mass screening trial.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to estimate the cost effectiveness of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: All 12,639 men born in the years 1921-1933 (aged 64-73) living in Viborg County, Denmark, were randomly allocated either to receive an invitation to abdominal ultrasound scanning for AAA or to be controls. Costs for screening and surveillance were assessed prospectively. Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) costs from 1999 were used concerning admissions with uncomplicated and complicated operations. Admissions for AAA surgery were retrospectively classified according to complications in patient records. RESULTS: Mean follow-up time was 52 months. 76.6% of invited men attended screening, and 191 (4.0%) had an AAA. As previously reported, the cumulative 5-year AAA-specific mortality in the invited group was significantly reduced by 67% compared to the control group (P = 0.003). The costs were estimated to be Euro 11.23 per scan. The costs per life-year saved were Euro 9057 (Euro 5872-20,063) after 5 years, and were expected to decrease to Euro 2708 (Euro 1758-6031) after 10 years and to Euro 1825 (Euro 1185-4063) after 15 years. CONCLUSION: Screening of 64-73 years old males in Denmark seems cost effective.     

Influence of presentation on outcome in abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVES: In the absence of formal screening abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) are detected in an opportunistic manner. Many remain asymptomatic and undetected until they rupture. Incidentally discovered small AAAs are entered into a surveillance programme until they reach a suitable size for repair. The aim of this study was to examine trends in the management of AAA and whether the method of presentation had an effect on subsequent mortality. DESIGN: Observational study in UK district general hospital. MATERIALS/METHODS: This study reports a single surgeon case series identified using a prospectively maintained database. Data on mode of presentation, management and mortality were retrieved from case notes, PIMS hospital database and the Office of National Statistics. RESULTS: Two hundred and five patients were referred with AAAs between 1992 and 2004, 78% presenting in elective circumstances. The surveillance programme fed 33% of the operated cases. Two aneurysms ruptured whilst under surveillance. Overall elective operative mortality was 11.8% and has progressively decreased over time. Thirty-day operated mortality was significantly lower in patients having a period of surveillance than those having immediate elective repair (2.3 vs. 16.3%, p=0.018). A slight reduction in emergency AAA repairs was noted over the study period (r2=0.6) although registered aneurysm deaths continue to increase (r2=0.83). CONCLUSIONS: Elective mortality following AAA surgery decreased over the study period. Outcome was better in those patients who had surgery for aneurysms that had been under surveillance. Despite opportunistic screening the population adjusted mortality rate of aortic aneurysms showed a progressive increase. A reduction in deaths from aneurysms is unlikely without a formal screening programme.     

Ultrasound screening of the abdominal aorta in patients with intermittent claudication

The presence of abdominal aortic dilatations and aneurysms (AAA) among 372 patients (302 men and 70 women) who originally presented with intermittent claudication was studied. The cohort was analysed in two ways, first retrospectively from the date of diagnosis of intermittent claudication until 1st of August 1985 (mean follow-up time being 70 months), second those alive at that date and who had not been operated on were offered ultrasound screening of their aorta. Retrospectively nine male patients were found to have had an operation for an aneurysm, one because of a rupture. Of the 110 patients who died and had not had surgery, 88 (73 men, 15 women) were autopsied and AAA was found at autopsy in six males and one female. Two males died of rupture. Ultrasonographic screening of the abdominal aorta was performed in 183 patients (147 men and 36 women) and dilatation was found in 25 patients (24 men, 1 woman). In the male part of the total material (n = 257) there were 39 patients (15%) with aneurysm or dilatation. Male patients with AAA or dilated aortas were significantly heavier, with a lower ankle arm index and higher serum cholesterol values than patients without AAA or aortic dilatation.     

Abdominal aortic aneurysms. Risk factors and complications and their influence on indication for operation

From January 1982 to June 1986 475 patients underwent operation for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with reconstruction by tube graft or bifurcation graft. Patients were subdivided into 2 groups, those operated upon either electively or those operated upon urgently. The overall hospital mortality following elective intervention was 4.9%, following emergency intervention 36.5%. In patients operated upon electively preoperative risk factors such as history of myocardial infarction or coronary artery disease did not influence mortality. In patients operated upon urgently, however, the postoperative mortality was significantly higher (p less than 0.005) in those with a history of myocardial infarction or coronary artery disease. Postoperative morbidity in the emergency group (2.7 complications per patient) was significantly higher than in the elective group (0.94 complications per patient). These results show that early elective operation on asymptomatic aneurysms and younger patients with few risk factors can prevent rupture and reduce postoperative mortality to an acceptable level.     

Outcome of treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms depending on the type of hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome of patients operated on acutely for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) or otherwise symptomatic aortic aneurysms in a university hospital and in two county hospitals by the same group of vascular surgeons. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: 1 university and 2 county hospitals, Sweden. SUBJECTS: 108 patients operated on urgently for AAA, 81 at the university hospital, and 27 at the county hospitals between January 1992 and December 1998. INTERVENTION: Repair of the AAA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: 21 of the 81 patients having urgent repair of an AAA at the university hospital (26%) had been transferred from the county hospitals. Thirteen patients were not operated on, 7 because of their poor general condition and great age (median 84 years), 3 who refused operation, and 3 in whom the diagnosis was incorrect. During the same time period a further 27 haemodynamically unstable patients were operated on by the same vascular surgeons at the county hospitals. The on-table mortality for patients with ruptured AAA and shock was 5/43 (12%) at the university hospital and 4/27 (15%) at the county hospitals. The corresponding in-hospital rates were 11/43 (26%) and 11/27 (41%). Mortality was significantly higher if the operation was delayed by more than 45 minutes. The incidence of postoperative complications was the same in both hospitals. CONCLUSION: If a patient with a ruptured AAA and shock is admitted to the county hospital and operated on by a specialist vascular surgeon the outcome is fully acceptable. The difference seems to be related to the postoperative period. To what extent the delay caused by the surgeon's journey to the county hospital has any influence on the outcome is not possible to evaluate.     

Effectiveness and cost of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: results of a population screening program

OBJECTIVES: We undertook this study to calculate the cost per life-year gained in the first round of a screening program for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and to estimate the costs in a subsequent round. METHODS: This was an intervention study, with follow-up for ruptured aneurysms. Men older than 50 years were screened for asymptomatic AAA. Outcome measures included cost per life-year saved and number of men needed to be screened to save one life. RESULTS: The incidence of ruptured AAA was 2.6 per 10,000 person- years in the screening group and 7.1 per 10,000 person-years in the control group. Screening is estimated to have prevented 10.8 ruptured AAA and 8 deaths per year, gaining 51 life-years per year for the study population, and to have reduced the incidence of ruptured AAA by 64% (95% CI, 42%-77%). Each life-year gained during the first screening round cost $1107. To save one life, 1000 men need to be screened and 5 elective operations performed. We predict that a second round of screening can be cost neutral. CONCLUSIONS: The cost-effectiveness of screening for AAA compares favorably with screening programs for other disorders in adults.     

Psychological consequences of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm and conservative treatment of small abdominal aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the potential psychological consequences of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). METHODS: The participants were prospectively and randomly sampled from a randomised screening trial for AAA and asked to complete a validated generic and global anonymous quality of life (QL) questionnaire by self-assessment (ScreenQL). Material case-control study: ScreenQL was completed once by 168 (48%) of 350 non-responders to screening, 271 (81%) of 335 attenders before screening, 286 (85%) of 335 attenders after screening, 127 (85%) of 149 with a small AAA diagnosed at screening, and 231 (66%) of 350 who were randomised not to be offered screening for AAA (controls). Prospective study (paired data): 127 men having a small AAA diagnosed. Twenty-nine (81%) of 36 men operated after initial conservative treatment. RESULTS: Initially, the QL score was 5% lower among men with a small AAA compared to the controls (p<0.05), mainly because of poorer health perception. The QL score declined significantly further to 7% below control values during the period of conservative treatment. This impairment was mainly due to a 21% and 15% reduction in scores relating to health perception and psychosomatic distress, respectively. However, all scores improved to control levels in patients operated on. The QL of attending men for screening was significantly lower than that of the controls and the attenders after the screening. No differences were noticed concerning the non-attenders. CONCLUSION: The offer of screening causes transient psychological stress in subjects found not to have AAA. However, diagnosis of an AAA seems to impair QL permanently and progressively in conservatively treated cases. This impairment seems reversible by operation. Nevertheless, the impairment seems considerable, and must be considered in the management of AAA and in the final evaluation of screening for AAA.     

Development of cardiovascular procedures before abdominal aortic aneurysm repair over 16 years.

INTRODUCTION: Preoperative screening, interventional and surgical therapy of cardiovascular diseases are of pivotal importance for a successful outcome after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery. METHODS: In a retrospective study all patients who underwent surgery for AAA were reevaluated for preoperative diagnostic and therapeutic interventions for cardiovascular diseases. Two study periods 1980-1989 and 1990-1996 were defined. Of 603 patients operated upon because of AAA between 1980 and 1996, 449 were operated on an elective basis and 154 as an emergency. Preoperative diagnostic studies for coronary artery disease (CAD) were performed in electively operated patients only and were positive in 76.8% (1980-1989: 76.1%, 1990-1996: 77.5%). Coronary angiography was performed in 108 patients (29.6%). Medical therapy of CAD declined by 2.3%, interventional procedures by 18.8%. In contrast, myocardial revascularization with subsequent aneurysm resection increased by 26. 6% and 12 patients (16%) required urgent simultaneous cardiac and aortic surgery. Early mortality after AAA surgery dropped from 4.2% to 2.9%, the frequency of primary cardiac failure as the cause of death was reduced from 33.3% to 22.2% (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: 42.6% more cardiac surgical procedures were performed before AAA surgery since 1990 compared with the period 1980-1989. In contrast, the number of interventional procedures fell by 18.8%. Surgical therapy of cardiac disease reduces early mortality after elective AAA surgery.     

Emergency aorto-iliac aneurysm surgery with low mortality and morbidity

A retrospective review of urgently operated aortic or iliac aneurysms over a 13 1/2 year period identified 51 patients (50 male, one female). In our consecutive series, 45 patients underwent an emergency operation for an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and six patients for an iliac aneurysm (IA). Mean age was 69 years. All patients had prominent symptoms: acute low abdominal pain or low back pain in 20 patients, shock in six patients, shock and pain in 25 patients. Free rupture was found in 28 cases, retroperitoneal rupture in 14 cases, fissurisation in seven and arterio-venous fistulisation in two cases. All reconstructions were done by the same vascular surgeon using Dacron prostheses. Intra-operative mortality rate was 3.9% (n = 2), 30-day mortality was 21.6% (n = 11) and cumulative hospital mortality was 23.5% (n = 12). The morbidity was 59%.     

The cost of elective and emergency repair of AAA in patients under and over the age of 80.

BACKGROUND: As Australia's population ages, the number of elderly patients presenting for surgery of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA), both elective and ruptured, will increase. The aim of the present study was to compare the costs of treatment of patients with AAA, under and over the age of 80, in the elective and emergency settings in a hospital with a divisional structure in which the true costs can be accurately obtained. METHODS: A total of 40 patients were selected at random from a series of 267 patients treated with open surgery for AAA between January 1987 and December 1994, 10 in each of four groups: group A, elective repair in patients aged < 80 (171/267); group B, elective AAA repair in patients aged > 80 (25/267); group C, emergency AAA repair in patients aged < 80 (50/267); and group D, emergency AAA repair in patients aged > 80 (11/267). A retrospective analysis of the hospital costs of treatment of these patients at St George Hospital was conducted. These true costs were then compared to Australian National Diagnostic Related Group (AN-DRG) costs. RESULTS: Group A and B had no mortality. In Group C and D the mortality was 20 and 60%, respectively. The emergency treatment groups also had longer lengths of stay. A statistically significant difference in cost of AAA repair between elective and emergency groups in both age groups was seen; that is, group A cost less than group C and group B cost less than group D. Costs per survivor, however, showed a dramatic difference between the cost of group C patients ($30000) and group D patients ($60000). In comparison with AN-DRG calculated costs, the true costs of groups A and B were equivalent to AN-DRG costs. In the emergency groups, however, there were marked discrepancies between the true cost ($61000) and that calculated by the DRG ($25000) in group D, with similar differences seen in group C to a lesser extent. CONCLUSION: Emergency repair of AAA is significantly more expensive and has a high mortality in the over-80 age group. Also, there is a substantial shortfall between the true costs of treating these patients and the funds allocated for treatment in this group.     

Emergency Aorto-Iliac Aneurysm Surgery with Low Mortality and Morbidity

A retrospective review of urgently operated aortic or iliac aneurysms over a 13 V2 year period identified 51 patients (50 male, one female). In our consecutive series, 45 patients underwent an emergency operation for an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and six patients for an iliac aneurysm (IA). Mean age was 69 years. All patients had prominent symptoms: acute low abdominal pain or low back pain in 20 patients, shock in six patients, shock and pain in 25 patients.

Free rupture was found in 28 cases, retroperitoneal rupture in 14 cases, fissurisation in seven and arterio-venous fistuli-sation in two cases. All reconstructions were done by the same vascular surgeon using Dacron prostheses. Intra-operative mortality rate was 3.9% (n = 2), 30-day mortality was 21.6% (n = 11) and cumulative hospital mortality was 23.5% (n =12). The morbidity was 59%.     

High-risk and low-risk screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm both reduce aneurysm-related mortality. A stratified analysis from a single-centre randomised screening trial.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular diseases and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are both associated with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). The aim of this study was therefore to analyse whether screening for AAA could be restricted to men with such diseases (high risk group). METHODS: Before the date of randomisation of a population screening trial of 12,639 64-73-year-old males, all discharge diagnoses from the National Patient Registry concerning AAA-related diseases were merged with the screening results on attendance, AAA prevalence, and AAA-related mortality and overall mortality. Differences in proportions were compared by Chi square tests and differences in mortality by Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: The attendance rate was 78.8% and 6.7% had an AAA in the high risk group compared to 75.8% attendance (P<0.001) and 2.9% (P<0.001) in the remaining population. Cumulatively, screening of only high risk men with would have required 72.9% (95% C.I.: 72.3-74.5%) fewer screening invitations, would have discovered 46.1% (95% C.I.: 38.9-53.4%) of the AAA cases diagnosed and prevented 46.7% (95% C.I.: 28.3-65.7%) of the AAA-related deaths. However, screening decreased AAA-related mortality both among men with and without known COPD or cardiovascular diseases: mortality ratio: 0.22 (95% C.I.: 0.08-0.65), P=0.006, and 0.24 (95% C.I: 0.09-0.63, P=0.004, respectively. CONCLUSION: High-risk population screening would prevent less than half of AAA-related deaths. Therefore, restricting screening to such high-risk groups does not seem justified, but cost effectiveness analyses are needed to reach a firm conclusion.     

Selection for screening for familial aortic aneurysms.

The reported familial clustering of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) indicates the possible rewards of family-based screening programmes with respect both to the number of asymptomatic aneurysms detected and to identifying associated genes. Ultrasonographic screening of 28 families (25 brothers and 28 sisters) was carried out together with collecting a history and a blood sample for analysis of the cholesterol level and genetic markers. Among the screened siblings six (11 per cent), all > 60 years old, had an AAA > or = 3.0 cm in diameter. A further 11 siblings (21 per cent), six of whom were < 60 years old, had a wide (2.5-2.9 cm) aorta. The presence of an aneurysmal or wide aorta was significantly associated with smoking (P = 0.027), male sex (P = 0.008) and a proband age of < 60 years (P = 0.031). Polymorphic genetic markers for type III collagen and haptoglobin were not informative in these families. These results indicate that the efficiency of screening siblings of patients with AAA could be improved by limiting it to brothers with a smoking history and/or siblings of younger patients. The familial component appears to be greatest in these younger patients.     

Elective Versus Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A 1-Year Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a life-threatening condition with an overall mortality of 80%. It predominantly affects men 65-74 years of age and is caused by focal distension of the main blood vessel in the abdomen. Most patients go undetected until their aneurysm ruptures. Controversy surrounds the most appropriate form of screening for AAA. Currently, screening is only carried out selectively in patients with peripheral vascular disease. Some patients have their AAA detected incidentally, whilst ultrasound examination of the abdomen is carried out for other indications. These patients have the opportunity to undergo surveillance or elective surgery. The mortality rate of emergency surgical intervention following rupture (50%) is far worse in comparison to that of patients undergoing planned intervention under specialist vascular surgeons (5%). Despite improvements in outcomes from elective intervention for AAA as a result of specialisation, the overall mortality from this condition remains very high (80%) as the commonest presentation of an AAA is rupture. Screening all men aged 65-74 years is considered too costly in the current economic climate. However the cost difference between elective repair and emergency repair of AAA must be considered given that the outcome from elective AAA repair is far superior to that following ruptured AAA repair. Our objective was to retrospectively collect costs and outcomes of elective and emergency AAA repair in order to carry out a cost-effectiveness analysis. Four multiprofessional teams in accident and emergency, operation theatres, intensive care, and surgical wards at the Kent and Canterbury Hospital were selected from health-care professionals including doctors, managers, nurses, and clerical staff with the purpose of obtaining costs. Detailed cost data collection sheets were prepared to calculate costs, which included staff costs, consumables including drugs, intravenous fluids, equipment, investigations, laundry, catering, and stationery. An inventory of costs per item was obtained, and the total cost was calculated from the number of items used. Outcomes were measured in terms of survival. The total costs of emergency AAA repair were ￡96,700.69, with a cost per life saved of ￡24,175.17. The total cost of elective AAA repair was ￡76,583.22, with a cost per life saved of ￡5,470.23. Emergency intervention for AAA was found to cost five times more than a planned intervention per life saved per year.     

Endovascular versus "fast-track'' abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Recent studies have shown that endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has decreased costs, as well as decreased intensive care unit and total hospital length of stays when compared to abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair using a retroperitoneal exposure. The authors hypothesized that the fast-track AAA repair, which combines a retroperitoneal exposure with a patient care pathway that includes a gastric promotility agent and patient-controlled analgesia, would have no differences when compared to EVAR. Records of 58 patients who underwent AAA repair between April 14, 2000, and July 12, 2002, were reviewed retrospectively. Demographic information, length of stay, intraoperative and postoperative complications, mortality, and costs were evaluated. Fifty-eight AAA repairs were performed with the EVAR (n=28) and fast-track (n=30) techniques. The EVAR group was slightly older (72 vs 68 years, p=0.04), had slightly smaller average aneurysm size (5.5 +/-0.13 vs 6.1 +/-0.17 cm, p=0.008), and had more patients designated American Society of Anesthesia class 4 (p<0.0001). Both groups were predominantly male. Otherwise there were no statistically significant differences in risk factors. Patients who underwent fast-track repair tended to have a longer operation (216 +/-7.4 vs 158 +/-6.8 minutes, p<0.0001), with a greater volume of blood (1.8 +/-0.29 vs 0.32 +/-0.24 units, p=0.0005), colloid (565 +/-89 vs 32 +/-22 cc, p<0.0001), and crystalloid transfusions (4,625 +/-252 vs 2,627 +/-170 cc, p<0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences in the number of intraoperative or postoperative complications between the 2 groups. EVAR patients resumed a regular diet earlier (0.21 +/-0.08 vs 1.8 +/-0.11 days, p<0.0001). Intensive care unit stay was shorter for EVAR (0.50 +/-0.10 vs 0.87 +/-0.10 days, p=0.01), but floor (2.1 +/-0.23 vs 2.6 +/-0.21 days, p=0.17), and total hospital lengths of stay (2.8 +/-0.32 vs 3.4 +/-0.18 days, p=0.07) were similar between the 2 groups. Total hospital cost was lower in the fast-track (10,205 dollars +/-736 dollars vs 20,640 dollars +/- 1,206 dollars, p<0.0001) leading to greater overall hospital earnings (6,141 dollars +/- 1,280 dollars vs 107 dollars +/- 1,940 dollars, p=0.01). Fast-track AAA repair is a viable alternative for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Compared to endovascular repair, the fast-track method had increased transfusions of blood and intravenous fluids and increased operating room times, but equivalent lengths of floor and total hospital stay and increased total hospital earnings.     

The incidence of small abdominal aortic aneurysms and the change in normal infrarenal aortic diameter: implications for screening.

AIM: to study the incidence of small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA), and to investigate what proportion of normal infrarenal aortic diameters (IAD) expand with age. METHODS: longitudinal follow-up in a population-based aneurysm screening programme. The infrarenal aortic diameter (IAD) was measured by ultrasound. A second scan was performed in subjects with a normal aorta after an average of 5.5 years. RESULTS: data were analysed from 4072 subjects, 464 with a small AAA and 3608 with a normal aorta. The infrarenal aorta expanded in 15% of subjects, but significant growth (>5 mm) occurred in only 7%. Age and initial diameter were independent predictors for aortic dilatation. The effect of diameter at first screen was non-linear. The relative risk for expansion increased dramatically for IADs over 2.5 cm (test for departure of trend: chi2=52, p<0.0001). The effect of age was also non-linear, the risk of expansion was highest in the 60-69 year old age group; test for departure of trend (chi2=13, p=0.002). The incidence of new aneurysms was 3.5 per 1000 person-years (py) (95% CI: 2.8-4.4). The highest incidence of new aneurysms was found in the 60 to 69 year old age group. CONCLUSION: only a small proportion of the population is prone to aortic dilatation. Patients over 70 with an IAD <2.5 cm can be discharged from follow-up.     

Influence of gender on outcome from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to compare outcomes following ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in men and women. METHODS: Overall mortality from ruptured AAA was compared in men and women using the Western Australia Health Services Research Database. The linked chains of de-identified hospital morbidity and death records were selected using the ICD-9-CM (International Classification of Diseases - Clinical Modification) diagnostic and procedure codes pertaining to AAA. Cases were divided into three groups for analysis: patients who died without admission to hospital, those admitted to hospital with a ruptured AAA but who did not undergo operation, and patients who underwent operation for ruptured AAA. RESULTS: Ruptured AAA occurred in 648 men and 225 women over the age of 55 years during the decade 1985-1994. Only 50 per cent of women, compared with 59 per cent of men, were admitted to hospital. Of those admitted to hospital only 37 per cent of women underwent operation, compared with 63 per cent of men. The overall mortality rate from ruptured AAA was 90 per cent in women and 76 per cent in men (chi2 = 50.34, 1 d.f., P < 0.0001). Although women were, on average, 6 years older than men, this unfavourable pattern occurred across all age groups. CONCLUSION: Women with a ruptured AAA are more likely to die than men. More research is required to identify the causes of this sex difference.     

The value of screening in siblings of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the incidence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in a large group of siblings of Australian AAA patients to determine if screening in this group is justified. METHODS: 1254 siblings of 400 index AAA patients were identified and offered aortic ultrasound screening. An age and sex matched control group was recruited from patients having abdominal CT scans for non-vascular indications. AAA was defined by an infrarenal aortic diameter of > or =3 cm or a ratio of the infrarenal to suprarenal aortic diameter of > or =2.0. A ratio of 1.0-1.5 was considered normal, and a ratio of >1.5 to <2.0 was considered ectatic. Aortic enlargement was defined as ectasia or aneurysm. RESULTS: 276 (22%) siblings could be contacted and agreed to screening or had previously been diagnosed with AAA. All 118 controls had normal diameter aortas. 55/276 siblings had previously been diagnosed with AAA. The remaining 221 siblings underwent ultrasound screening. Overall, 30% (84/276) had enlarged aortas (5% ectasia, 25% aneurysmal); 43% of male siblings (64/150) and 16% of females siblings (20/126). The incidence was 45% in brothers of female index patients, 42% in brothers of male patients, 23% in sisters of female patients, and 14% in sisters of male index patients. CONCLUSIONS: The overall incidence of aortic enlargement of 30% found in this study warrants a targeted screening approach with ultrasound for all siblings of patients with AAA. A similar targeted approach for screening of the children of AAA patients would also seem advisable.     

Mortality from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in Wales.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to identify the incidence of, and mortality in, patients with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) reaching hospital alive in Wales. METHODS: Patients who presented with a ruptured AAA between September 1996 and August 1997 were analysed. Data were collected prospectively by an independent body, observing strict confidentiality. RESULTS: Some 233 patients with a confirmed ruptured AAA were identified, giving an incidence of eight per 100 000 total population. Some 133 patients (57 per cent) underwent attempted operative repair; 85 (64 per cent) of these died within 30 days. Of the 233 patients, 92 were admitted under the care of a vascular surgeon and 141 under a non-vascular surgeon. Vascular surgeons operated on 82 patients (89 per cent), of whom 50 (61 per cent) died, whereas non-vascular surgeons operated on 51 patients (36 per cent), of whom 35 (69 per cent) died. DISCUSSION: This study is unique as it is an independent prospective study of mortality in patients with a ruptured AAA who reached hospital alive. Mortality was independent of the operating surgeon, but vascular surgeons turned down significantly fewer patients than non-vascular surgeons (11 versus 64 per cent, P < 0.001).