The Effectiveness of Using a Nurse-Led Pain Relief Model for Pain Management among Abdominal Surgical Patients: A Single-Center,Controlled before-after Study in China

BackgroundEffective pain management is closely related to the prognosis of patients after surgery. Setting up acute pain service is among the effective strategies to control pain. The operation of acute pain service is mostly dominated by anesthesiologists; however, control of postsurgical pain is still unsatisfactory. Nurses are the main force for providing postoperative care of patients, and their role in acute pain service is crucial. Therefore, in the current study, we have developed a nurse-led pain relief model that emphasizes the central role of nurses during the entire surgical procedure. However, the effect of using this model for pain management among abdominal surgical patients remains unknown.AimsThe current study was conducted to investigate the effect of using a nurse-led pain relief model for pain management among abdominal surgical patients.DesignA single-center, propensity score-matched, controlled before–after study.MethodsThe patients, hospitalized for abdominal surgery in a university-affiliated hospital from January 2015 to December 2017, were enrolled and divided into group A (hospitalized before nurse-led pain relief model implementation, from January, 2015 to October, 2016) and group B (hospitalized after nurse-led pain relief model implementation, from October, 2016, to December, 2017) using propensity score match assay. The researchers compared the quality of acute pain management, the main side effects of pain management, and nurses’ pain knowledge and attitude between group A and group B.ResultsA total of 2851 patients undergoing nonemergency abdominal surgery were enrolled in the current study and were propensity matched 1:1 into two groups with 1,127 subjects in each group. The quality of acute pain management postsurgery was better after implementation of the nurse-led pain relief model. More patients received higher numerical rating scales cores (≥4 points) at indicated time points after surgery in group A compared with group B (14.20% vs. 12.24% 6 hours postsurgery, p = .001; 12.33% vs. 8.52% 12 hours postsurgery, p = .004; 12.95% vs. 3.99% 24 hours postsurgery, p = .036; 16.06% vs. 7.19% 48 hours postsurgery, p = .001). Furthermore, the occurrence of nausea and vomiting during pain management were significantly decreased in patients from group B (nausea: X² = 38.926, p < .05; vomit: X² = 39.302, p < .05). Additionally, after using the nurse-led pain relief model, nurses were more open to improving their knowledge and attitudes to pain management (p < .05).ConclusionOur study demonstrated that a nurse-led pain relief model can enhance the quality of acute pain management among post-abdominal surgical patients, suggesting that such a model can be an effective intervention for providing a better pain control among postsurgical patients.     

An integrated care pathway for the management of low back pain

Low back pain is a disabling condition that is responsible for a considerable amount of health service expenditure [HMSO, London, 1994, p. 1; The Back Pain Revolution. Churchill Livingstone, London, 1999]. Following national recommendations from the Clinical Standards Advisory Group [HMSO, London, 1994, p. 1] and the Royal College of General Practitioner Guidelines [Royal College of General Practice, London, 1996, 1999], local initiatives have attempted to integrate this advice into care pathways for low back pain. This paper will detail the background development, construction and audit of an integrated care pathway for the management of patients with acute low back pain in North Staffordshire.     

Secondary prevention for coronary heart disease: a qualitative study

The many responsibilities of primary care, cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease is a growing concern. Demanding standards have been given to primary care in the National Service Framework for Coronary Heart Disease. This article reports an evaluation of an intervention to support primary care service providers in this responsibility. A part-time specialist nurse and a part-time exercise worker were appointed to work in a group of 11 GP practices in a primary care trust in a city in the north of England. The evaluation component reported here is a qualitative study of the perceptions of health professionals on secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. Interviews were conducted with 18 primary care staff from practices in both intervention (n = 11) and control (n = 11) groups. The evaluation revealed support for the development of nurse-led clinics, increased confidence and skills development among practice nurses, but some concern about competing demands on practice nurses' time. Primary healthcare professionals found their resources stretched by competing demands on their time from government initiatives.     

The safety and effectiveness of a nurse-led anticoagulant service

AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of anticoagulant nurses and a consultant haematologist in managing anticoagulant patients in a hospital outpatient setting. BACKGROUND: Nurses are increasingly developing roles traditionally undertaken by medical staff. As a result nurse-led practice has expanded in many areas including anticoagulant services. Previous studies have attempted to demonstrate the effectiveness of using other professionals to manage anticoagulant clinics over short periods of time. This research evaluates the safety and effectiveness of a consultant-led and a nurse-led service over two sequential 18-month periods. RESEARCH METHODS: A nonexperimental design was adopted. Data were collected retrospectively, from a random sample of 197 patients, who had been managed by both the consultant-led and nurse-led service. Two main outcome measures were selected: anticoagulant control between professional groups and interval between outpatient clinic appointments. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference in anticoagulant control was found between professional groups (P=0.137). There was evidence that patients attended anticoagulant clinics on significantly fewer occasions with nurse-led management (P < 0.0005). CONCLUSION: At the department within which this research was conducted, anticoagulant nurses were found to be at least as safe and effective as the consultant haematologist in managing outpatient anticoagulant patients over the study period. These findings are of importance in both shaping the future provision of anticoagulant care and also contributing to the wider area in evaluating the impact of nurse-led practice within health care.     

Primary care groups and trusts: a threat or an opportunity for the development of community-based nursing in England

AIMS OF THE STUDY: To examine the role of Primary Care Groups and Trusts (PCG/T) in relation to nurses working in general practice and community health services. BACKGROUND: Over the past two decades there have been rapid changes in the numbers and roles of nurses working in primary care and community based settings. The establishment of Primary Care Groups offers health care professionals, including nurses, the chance to develop local primary care services and to integrate community and primary care nursing. These developments may offer opportunities or pose threats to nursing staff. RESEARCH METHODS: Data are drawn from a longitudinal study of a randomly selected sample of Primary Care Groups in England (n = 72). In a second survey of Groups carried out in autumn/winter 2000, Primary Care Group chairs and chief officers were interviewed by telephone. RESULTS: Response rates were 97% for both chairs and chief officers (69 of each). Chairs indicated that in most areas Primary Care Groups were consulting with local nurses to develop policy. Fifty-seven (85%) reported that investment in nursing staff and nursing services was a high priority in their area. Twenty-eight (41%) indicated that nurse-led services designed to increase patient access had already been established in their area, and 20 (29%) were planning new nurse-led services. Many developments had been initiated by Primary Care Groups. Initiatives to integrate community and general practice based staff were underway in most areas. CONCLUSIONS: Primary Care Groups and Trusts are initiating changes in general practice and community based services which are likely to have long-term and important implications for nurses in terms of their roles, conditions of work and future careers. It is important that nurses are consulted and are involved in developing and implementing policy change.     

Providing Complementary and Alternative Medicine in primary care: the primary care workers' perspective

BACKGROUND: The use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) in primary care is growing, but still not widespread. Little is known about how CAM can/should be integrated into mainstream care. OBJECTIVES: To assess primary care health professionals' perceptions of need and of some ways to integrate CAM in primary care. METHOD: Questionnaire survey of primary health care workers in Northwest London. General Practitioners (GPs) were targeted in a postal survey, other members of the primary care team, such as district and practice nurses, were targeted via colleagues. The questionnaire assessed health care professionals' perspective on complementary medicine, referrals, ways to integrate complementary medicine into primary care and interest in research on CAM. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 149 GPs (40% response rate after one reminder) and 24 nurses and 32 other primary care team members. One hundred and seventy-one (83%) respondents had previously referred (or influenced referral) for CAM treatments, the main reasons cited were: patients request (68%), conventional treatments failed (58%) and evidence (36%) (more than one reason could be given). Acupuncture and homoeopathy were the therapies for which patients were most frequently referred, followed by manual therapies. There was a significant interest in more training/information on CAM (66%). Only 12 respondents (6%) were against any integration of CAM in mainstream primary care. Most respondents felt that CAM therapies should be provided by doctors (66%) or other health professionals trained in CAM (82%). Twenty-six percent of respondents agreed with provision of CAM by non-state-registered practitioners. It was felt that the integration of CAM could lead to cost savings (70%), particularly in conditions involving pain, but also cost increases (55%) particularly in 'poorly defined conditions'. Fifty-six percent of respondents would consider participating in studies investigating CAM. The greatest interest was in acupuncture (41% of those who expressed an interest in research), homoeopathy (30%) and therapeutic massage/aromatherapy (26%). CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable interest in CAM among primary care professionals, and many are already referring or suggesting referral. Such referrals are driven mainly by patient demand and by dissatisfaction with the results of conventional medicine. Most of our respondents were in favour of integrating at least some types of CAM in mainstream primary care. There is an urgent need to further educate/inform primary care health professionals about CAM.     

Improving access to clinical information in after hours community palliative care.

OBJECTIVE: To improve access to clinical information for nurses and doctors providing after hours community palliative care in a regional Australian setting. DESIGN: This was an action research project designed to improve collation and distribution of succinct, pertinent and timely information about unstable palliative care patients to nurses and general practitioners (GPs) involved in after hours care. Each week day, each patient's purpose-designed single-page information sheet was updated on the community palliative care service computers. This sheet was designed to give key abstracted information on each patient's history, current condition, treatment and plans for future care. Patients considered to be unstable had their sheets faxed to the GPs on call. SETTING AND SUBJECTS: This procedure was followed for all adult patients admitted to Ballarat Hospice Care Inc, Victoria, Australia between June and August 2004. The nurses and Executive Officer at Ballarat Hospice Care Inc and thirteen GPs from the Ballarat and District Division of General Practitioners were involved in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Surveys and feedback from palliative care nurses and GPs. RESULTS: A one-page information sheet provided essential clinical information to nurses and doctors. The nurses' confidence markedly increased with ready access to the information sheets on a hand held Palm Pilot. The nurses also reported improved outcomes for patients using this approach and there was favourable feedback from GPs. CONCLUSIONS: This project led to the development of a simple, effective and low cost means of improving communication between professionals caring for palliative care patients after hours.     

Practice nurses and clinical guidelines in a changing primary care context: an empirical study

BACKGROUND: Practice Nurses form an increasingly large proportion of the English National Health Service primary care workforce and the delegation to them of clinical work from General Practitioners has attracted some academic attention. Central to this process are clinical guidelines, which provide the interface between the movement towards 'evidence-based practice' and a range of government-driven policy developments in primary care. AIMS: To identify the attitudes of practice nurses to clinical guidelines; to investigate the impact of guidelines on nurse/physician relationships; and to describe the impact of the changing primary care context on nurses. METHODS: We interviewed a sample of 29 Practice Nurses three times during a 16-month period to clarify their attitudes towards guidelines, their use of guidelines in practice and their assessment of guidelines' importance. We gathered further data on organizational culture and perceptions of national reforms of primary care structures. RESULTS: We found that practice nurses are generally supportive of clinical guidelines. Moreover, nurses' role and influence within primary care is in a process of transition to one in which they may undertake responsibility for influencing General Practitioners' clinical behaviour so as to adhere to guidelines. Practice nurses themselves recognize and welcome this, though with some reservations. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the proposal that explicit codification of the scientific basis of the work of lower paid groups may enhance their relative professional status.     

Nurses' in the multi-professional pain team: a study of attitudes, beliefs and treatment endorsements.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: It is widely accepted that chronic pain is best treated by a multidisciplinary team. Team approaches are best facilitated if all members understand their own and each others role. Roles and responsibilities have inherent values and beliefs which need to be understood if the team is going to function optimally. Little is known about the attitudes and beliefs of the pain team or the individual professionals within it. All members of the pain team therefore need to critically examine the values and beliefs they bring to these teams. The aim of this study was to start this process for nurses. This was done uniquely by: finding out what components of pain management nurses endorse as important; investigating their beliefs about pain management; and exploring whether nurses' beliefs differ in relation to other service providers. METHOD: Data from 103 nurses was extracted from a wider research study of the congruence between what service providers and service users believe to be important treatments for chronic pain. Nurses were surveyed regarding their opinions about which specific treatments or treatment components they would endorse for people with chronic pain. Skevington's Beliefs About Pain Control Questionnaire (BPCQ) was also included. This measured beliefs in three crucial areas; the internal or personal control of pain, beliefs that powerful others (doctors) control pain and beliefs that pain is controlled by chance events. Statistical comparisons were made between nurses who endorsed particular treatments and their belief pattern. Differences between nurses and other professionals and service users were explored. RESULTS: The study showed that nurses were high treatment endorsers. There was universal agreement to the importance of 'The nurse', 'The multidisciplinary team', 'relaxation', and 'psychological assessment' for chronic pain management'. Nurses' endorsement patterns were different to the other professionals, because they endorsed more treatments. BPCQ scores were consistently lower than the other professionals and the service users. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study are congruent with emerging literature highlighting the complexity of health care. The high endorsement patterns seen in this study could be taken as support that nurses are, either tacitly or overtly, aware of this need to approach pain management in an open-minded and flexible manner.     

A new role for nurses as Primary Care Cancer Lead Clinicians in Primary Care Trusts in England

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the Primary Care Cancer Lead Clinician initiative in England. One of the objectives was to examine the impact of the Primary Care Cancer Lead Clinicians' clinical background on how they perform their role. This study compares nurses and General Practitioners in the Primary Care Cancer Lead Clinician role. BACKGROUND: The Primary Care Cancer Lead Clinician initiative developed from the National Health Service Cancer Plan. Primary Care Cancer Lead Clinicians are expected to work strategically to raise the standards of cancer care within primary care. METHODS: A postal questionnaire survey was sent to Primary Care Cancer Lead Clinicians and one manager in each Primary Care Trust in England. Telephonic interviews were also undertaken with a range of stakeholders in six case study areas. RESULTS: There were striking similarities between nurses and General Practitioners in the Primary Care Cancer Lead Clinician role. Differences related to the wider roles of the two groups. Nurses placed greater emphasis on fitting in whereas General Practitioners were more likely to expect to take charge and look for administrative support. CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence to show that whether the Primary Care Cancer Lead Clinician was a nurse or a General Practitioner was less important than having local credibility and the support of their Primary Care Trust.     

NHS walk-in centres and the expanding role of primary care nurses

Forty pilot NHS walk-in centres have opened over the past two years to provide drop-in nurse-led primary care in England without the input of doctors. As such, these centres represent a revolution for nurse-led care in the health service. However, research suggests that there is considerable variation in the degree of autonomy and independence exercised by the nurses in the different centres. This article discusses this variation, the role of walk-in centre nurses and how this might develop in future.     

Comparing doctor- and nurse-led care in a sexual health clinic: patient satisfaction questionnaire

BACKGROUND: A new model of comprehensive care nurse-led clinics has enabled experienced genitourinary medicine nurses to co-ordinate the first-line, comprehensive care of female patients presenting with sexually transmitted infections and other sexual health conditions and issues. AIM: This paper describes the development of a patient satisfaction questionnaire to compare the satisfaction of women attending nurse-led or doctor-led clinics at a central London genitourinary medicine clinic. METHODS: A previously validated questionnaire was adapted using the findings of qualitative interviews exploring patient expectations of the service. The draft questionnaire was tested for internal consistency, sub-scale homogeneity, construct validity and stability. The final version consisted of a 34 item, five-point Likert scale, which was found to be both reliable (Cronbach's alpha 0.91) and stable (test-retest 0.95). There was some evidence of construct validity. The questionnaire was then distributed to a convenience sample of 132 women attending a nurse-led clinic and 150 seen at a doctor-led clinic. RESULTS: There was a 90% response rate. The median total satisfaction scores, out of a total of five, were 4.47 and 4.30 for the nurse-led and doctor-led groups, respectively (P = 0.05). Significantly higher scores on the sub-scales measuring quality and competence of technical care (P < 0.001), provision of information (P = 0.01) and overall satisfaction (P = 0.01) were seen for the nurse-led group. No significant differences were found in the sub-scales measuring service attributes and specific attributes of interpersonal relationships. CONCLUSION: The rigorous development, piloting and testing phases of this satisfaction questionnaire led to reliable and valid results. This study demonstrated that nurse-led clinics within this service are an acceptable alternative to the existing doctor-led clinics.     

美国医师协会2017版腰背痛非侵入性管理指南要点解读

美国医师协会在2017年发布了《急性、亚急性和慢性腰背痛非侵入性管理临床实践指南》,本文主要从指南发布的背景、腰背痛的分类及干预效果的判断标准方面介绍该指南的相关信息,就腰背痛药物干预及非药物干预策略进行解读,并针对急性/亚急性腰背痛患者、慢性腰背痛患者及对非药物性干预效果不佳的慢性腰背痛患者给出了3条推荐意见,以期能让临床护理人员更好地了解该指南,并为做好腰背痛的相关预防和管理提供参考。     

Responses of primary health care professionals to UK national guidelines on the management and referral of women with breast conditions

Rationale, aims and objectives To explore the responses of primary health care professionals to guidelines in general, and to the UK national guidelines on the management and referral of women with breast conditions in particular. Methods Qualitative study using practice‐based, semistructured group discussions with primary health care professionals. All practices were involved in a study evaluating the effect of the national breast symptom management guidelines on clinical practice. Discussion groups were conducted in the practice; fifteen of the 34 study practices were audio‐taped. Groups comprised the available partners and practice nurses at each practice. All members of each group were well known to one another. There was good attendance by all doctors, with 75% of male partners and 90% of female partners present at the meetings. Of the practice nurses 51% attended. In all, 86 professionals attended the meetings. Results A number of areas for comment arose consistently in each discussion. Guidelines in general were welcomed, although there was more support for evidence‐based than consensus‐based guidelines. The breast lump guideline was also welcomed, participants commenting that it was concordant with current practice. The breast pain guideline was more contentious, participants reflecting that it recommended more primary care management than was usual, and fell outside the experience and confidence of doctors or the expectations of patients. Participants felt it did not incorporate psychosocial factors into recommended management, despite this being an important part of primary care management. Conclusions There are concerns about consensus guidelines and doubts about the applicability of the breast pain guideline in this complex management area. The failure of these guidelines to address patient anxiety may limit their implementation.     

Postoperative pain: strategy for improving patient experiences

BACKGROUND: Many patients continue to suffer moderate pain following surgery. Much of this may be unnecessary and could be alleviated with careful strategic pain management. It appears that the knowledge and attitudes of both health care professionals and patients are pivotal to patients' pain experiences. AIM: This paper reports the introduction and evaluation of a nurse-led intervention to improve pain management after surgery. METHODS: The study design was experimental (pretest-post-test), comparing patients' pain scores in a control and an intervention hospital over time. The control hospital was included to assess if temporal effects reduced pain scores during the study period. A convenience patient sample was used, and patients' pain scores were measured in two phases (n = 800). Baseline data were compared with subsequent data collected after the introduction of the nurse-led intervention. The intervention included education for nurses in the form of short pain courses, introduction of regular pain assessment and profiling of pain at hospital level. RESULTS: Introduction of the nurse-led intervention reduced patients' pain scores. This reduction, in the order of 0.73 cm (7.3%) on a visual analogue scale (0-10 cm), was statistically significant for day of surgery and 2 days postsurgery (P < 0.05) in the intervention hospital. A reduction was not seen in the control hospital. CONCLUSION: Improvements in pain management can be made by embracing basic pain management principles.     

Effectiveness of nurse-led brief alcohol intervention: a cluster randomized controlled trial

AIM: This paper reports an evaluation of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of nurse-led screening and brief intervention in reducing excessive alcohol consumption among patients in primary health care. BACKGROUND: Excessive alcohol consumption is a major source of social, economic and health problems. However, such consumption is responsive to brief alcohol intervention. To date, brief intervention research in primary health care has focused on general practitioner-led interventions, and there is only circumstantial evidence of effectiveness in nurse-led interventions. However, nurses are increasingly taking a lead in health promotion work in primary care. METHODS: A pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial was carried out between August 2000 and June 2003 to evaluate the effects of a brief intervention compared with standard advice (control condition). A total of 40 general practice clusters (intervention = 21 and control = 19) recruited 127 patients (intervention = 67 and control = 60) to the trial. Excessive consumption was identified opportunistically via the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. After baseline assessment, patients received either a 5-10 minutes brief intervention using the 'Drink-Less' protocol or standard advice (control condition). Follow-up occurred at 6 and 12 months postintervention. RESULTS: Analysis of variance weighted for cluster size revealed no statistically significant differences between intervention and control patients at follow up. A majority of patients in both conditions reduced their alcohol consumption between assessment and subsequent measurement. Economic analysis suggested that the brief intervention led to no statistically significant changes in subsequent health service resource use relative to standard treatment. CONCLUSION: The brief intervention evaluated in this trial had no effect over standard advice delivered by nurses in primary health care. However, there was a reduction in excessive drinking across both arms of the trial over time. Due to nurse drop-out, this trial was significantly underpowered. Future research should explore barriers to nurses' involvement in research trials, particularly with an alcohol focus. A larger trial is required to evaluate the effectiveness of nurse-led screening and brief alcohol intervention in primary care.     

Being strategic: utilising consumer views to better promote an expanded role for nurses in Australian general practice

Australian consumers have articulated their perceptions of the role of the nurse in general practice. Practice Nurses (PNs) and General Practitioners (GPs) have also highlighted the issues they believe currently and potentially impact on this role in Australia. This paper identifies and discusses the nexus between the consumers' perceptions and expectations and health professionals' issues. Data collected from focus groups and interviews in 2 Australian studies of consumer perception of nursing in general practice, are re-considered alongside findings reported in the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners and the Royal College of Nursing, Australia report; General Practice Nursing in Australia. Consumers, doctors and nurses working in general practices in Australia, raised similar issues. However, consumers considered these issues in relation to their health care needs, whereas the GPs and PNs tended to focus more on professional and structural tensions related to the current and potentially expanded role of the PN. Understanding consumer views vis-a-vis issues raised by PNs and GPs about the role of nursing in general practice provides direction for both professions to better work with consumers to enhance their understanding of what general practice services could be and how changes, like expanding the role of nurses, may bring about improvements in the health outcomes of consumers. Health professionals can benefit from reflecting on the experiences and expectations of consumers if they desire to make general practice services more responsive to individual consumer's needs and at the same time adopt a primary health care focus.     

Palliative care in advanced kidney disease: a nurse-led joint renal and specialist palliative care clinic

The National Service Framework for Renal Services Part 2 identifies quality requirements for end-of-life care for individuals with kidney failure, recognizing the potential to forge closer relationships between renal and specialist palliative care providers. This article describes a pilot project set up by two Clinical Nurse Specialists, one working in hospice specialist palliative care and the other in renal palliative care within an acute trust. The purpose of the pilot was to work in collaboration to run a streamlined nurse-led clinic that would meet the palliative care needs of chronic kidney disease (CKD) Stage 5 patients and their carers. To achieve this the clinic would have to provide optimal symptom management, empower patients to make their own choices, and support them with advance care planning underpinned by the End of Life Care Strategy. The partnership also aimed to promote service improvement and practice development using transference of knowledge, skills, and expertise. Initial informal feedback, including a very small patient survey, suggests that the clinic was well received by patients, carers, and other health professionals. The clinic is ongoing and deserves more formal evaluation to encourage future service development.