A randomized comparison of two regimens of misoprostol for second-trimester pregnancy termination

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and side effects of two different misoprostol regimens for second-trimester pregnancy termination. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a randomized clinical trial in patients who were at 14 to 23 weeks of gestation and who were admitted for medical termination of pregnancy. All patients received 800 microg of vaginal misoprostol and were assigned randomly to 400 microg of oral misoprostol or 400 microg of vaginal misoprostol every 8 hours. Efficacy and side effects were compared. The mean induction time of the study group was compared with that of an historic control group that had received 400 microg vaginally every 12 hours. RESULTS: Forty-three women were assigned randomly, 22 women to vaginal misoprostol and 21 women to oral misoprostol. Induction time and hospital stay were slightly shorter for the oral group; however, the differences were not significant. Side effects were similar for both groups. CONCLUSION: After an initial 800 microg dose of vaginal misoprostol, a regimen of 400 microg of oral misoprostol every 8 hours is as effective as the same dose of vaginal misoprostol with no additional side effects, which provides a convenient alternative for midtrimester pregnancy termination.     

Randomized comparison of 3 misoprostol protocols for abortion induction at 13-20 weeks of gestation

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the induction-to-abortion time of 3 pharmacokinetic-based protocols at 13-20 weeks of gestation. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized trial was conducted on 153 patients. The oral group (n = 51) received 100 microg misoprostol orally every 2 hours, the vaginal group (n = 51) received 200 microg misoprostol vaginally every 4 hours, and the sublingual group (n = 51) received 100 microg misoprostol sublingually every 2 hours. RESULTS: The mean induction-to-delivery time was shorter in the sublingual group (mean, 651 +/- 507) as compared to the vaginal group (mean, 1,056 +/- 634, p = 0.01). The number of patients who delivered within 12 hours was significantly higher in the sublingual group (n = 39, 78%) as compared to the oral (n = 26, 52%) and vaginal (n = 20, 40%) groups (p < 0.001). The numbers of patients who delivered within 24 hours were comparable in the sublingual (n = 47, 94%) and oral (n = 46, 92%) groups but higher than in the vaginal group (n = 39, 78%; p = 0.02). The total misoprostol dose was 543 +/- 422 microg in the sublingual group, 878 +/- 533 microg in the vaginal group and 741 +/- 413 microg in the oral group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A pharmacokinetic-based application of 100 microg of sublingual misoprostol every 4 hours is more effective for induction of second-trimester abortion as compared to 100 microg oral misoprostol every 2 hours and 200 microg vaginal misoprostol every 4 hours.     

A randomized trial of oral and vaginal misoprostol to manage delivery in cases of fetal death

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and side effects of oral and vaginal misoprostol for the termination of second and third trimester pregnancy with intrauterine fetal death. METHODS: Eighty pregnant women at 16-41 weeks' gestation with intrauterine fetal death were randomized in two groups to receive either 400 micro g of misoprostol orally every 4 hours (n = 40) or 200 micro g of misoprostol vaginally every 12 hours (n = 40) until the termination of pregnancy was completed. The adverse effects, progress, and outcomes of delivery were assessed. RESULTS: The groups were similar in age, weight, height, gestational age, parity, and modified Bishop scores before intervention. The mean induction-to-delivery time in the oral group (13.95 [standard deviation (SD) = 5.63] hours) was significantly shorter than the time in the vaginal group (18.87 [SD = 10.38] hours, P =.001). The number of deliveries within 24 hours after the initial drug administration in the oral group (92.5%) was significantly higher than the number in the vaginal group (67.5%, P <.001), and all delivered within 48 hours after the initial drug administration. However, the gastrointestinal side effects in the oral group was significantly higher than in the vaginal group (P =.005). CONCLUSION: Misoprostol (400 micro g given orally every 4 hours) was more effective than misoprostol (200 micro g given vaginally every 12 hours) for the termination of second and third trimester pregnancy with intrauterine fetal death, but with more gastrointestinal side effects.     

Efficacy of two regimens of misoprostol for early second-trimester pregnancy termination

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of a combined regimen of misoprostol with vaginal misoprostol for early 2nd-trimester pregnancy termination. METHODS: This is a prospective study that includes 79 pregnant women who requested legal termination of 2nd-trimester pregnancy between 13 and 22 weeks. Two regimens of misoprostol were used. Group 1: 400 microg of oral plus 400 microg vaginal misoprostol every 8 h (combined regimen) and group 2: 400 microg of vaginal misoprostol every 3 h up to a maximum of five doses (vaginal regimen). RESULTS: The induction-to-abortion interval was significantly longer in group 1 (25.5 +/- 24.45 h) than in group 2 (15 +/- 7.14 h) (p = 0.016). The abortion rate within 24 h in group 1 was of 56.8 vs. 85.7% in group 2 (p = 0.006). The hazard rate for vaginal delivery within 24 h was found to be 2.277-fold greater in the group with the combined therapy once controlled for plausible confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that oral misoprostol combined with vaginal misoprostol does not reduce the induction-to-abortion interval compared to an exclusively vaginal route when used for early 2nd-trimester pregnancy termination.     

Vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin and vaginal PGE2 for second-trimester labor induction

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, side effects, and complications of high-dose vaginal misoprostol with concentrated intravenous oxytocin plus low-dose vaginal prostaglandin (PGE(2)) for second-trimester labor induction. METHODS: One hundred twenty-six consenting women with maternal or fetal indications for pregnancy termination and no prior cesarean delivery were randomly assigned to receive either vaginal misoprostol 600 microg 1x, 400 microg every 4 hours 5x (misoprostol group, n = 60) or escalating-dose concentrated oxytocin infusions (277-1,667 mU/min) plus vaginal PGE(2) 10 mg every 6 hours 4x (oxytocin group, n = 66). Both groups received concurrent extra-amniotic saline infusion for cervical ripening. Women who failed their assigned regimen received 20 mg of PGE(2) suppositories every 4 hours until delivery. Analysis was by intent to treat. RESULTS: Demographic characteristics were similar between study groups. Median induction-to-delivery interval was significantly shorter in the misoprostol group (12 hours) than in the oxytocin group (17 hours; P <.001). There was a higher induction success rate at 24 hours in the misoprostol group (95%) than in the oxytocin group (85%; P =.06), although this difference did not reach statistical significance. The incidence of live birth (25% versus 17%), chorioamnionitis (5% versus 2%), and postpartum hemorrhage greater than 500 mL (3% versus 3%) were similar between the misoprostol and oxytocin groups, respectively. Diarrhea (2% versus 11%; P =.04), nausea/emesis (25% versus 42%; P =.04), and retained placenta requiring curettage (2% versus 15%; P =.008) were significantly less common in the misoprostol group when compared with the oxytocin group, respectively. Isolated intrapartum fever, however, was more frequent in the misoprostol group (67%) than in the oxytocin group (21%; P <.001). CONCLUSION: Compared with concentrated oxytocin plus low-dose vaginal PGE(2), high-dose vaginal misoprostol is associated with significantly shorter induction-to-delivery intervals, fewer side effects, a lower incidence of retained placenta, and comparable incidence of live birth.     

A comparison of oral misoprostol with vaginal misoprostol administration in second-trimester pregnancy termination for fetal abnormality

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy and side effects of oral misoprostol with vaginal misoprostol for second-trimester pregnancy termination. METHODS: A randomized clinical trial of medical pregnancy termination between 14 and 26 weeks' gestation was conducted. Three misoprostol regimens were compared: 400 microg vaginally at 6-hour intervals (group 1), 400 microg orally at 3-hour intervals (group 2), and a loading dose of 600 microg vaginally followed by 200 microg orally at 3-hour intervals (group 3). A sample size of 225 women was required for equivalence of the three regimens, with an interim safety analysis planned at 80 women. RESULTS: A significant difference between the groups was evident at the interim safety analysis and the study ceased. The subset of 84 women recruited before the study closure is described. There was a significant difference in the median time to achieve delivery among the three groups: group 1, 14.5 hours (95% confidence interval 12.0, 16.9), versus group 2, 25.5 hours (13.5, 23.8), versus group 3, 16.4 hours (interquartile range 14.2-37.3) (P =.042). Within 24 hours of commencement 85.7% of women in group 1, 44.8% in group 2, and 74.1% in group 3 delivered (P =.003). At 48 hours 0% in group 1, 20.7% in group 2, and 3.7% in group 3 were undelivered (P =.011). There was no difference in women's perceptions of the termination process. CONCLUSION: In second-trimester pregnancy termination, a vaginal misoprostol regimen of 400 microg every 6 hours was 1.9 times more likely to result in delivery within 24 hours from commencement than an oral regimen of 400 microg every 3 hours.     

A randomised trial of oral versus vaginal administration of misoprostol for the purpose of mid-trimester termination of pregnancy

A prospective randomised controlled trial was undertaken to compare the efficacy of two routes of administration, oral versus vaginal, of the prostaglandin E1 analogue misoprostol (Cytotec) to effect termination of pregnancy in the mid-trimester. Fifty-five women were recruited into the trial; 26 to receive all doses orally and 29 via the vaginal route. The dosing regimen was 400 microg as the initial dose followed by a second dose of 200 microg two hours later and then four-hourly 200 microg doses until delivery or 32 hours from commencement of treatment. If delivery had not been effected by the last dose of misoprostol, a Syntocinon infusion was started synchronously Misoprostol administered vaginally was significantly more effective than when administered orally as judged by induction-to-delivery interval and also the need or otherwise to augment therapy with a Syntocinon infusion. The average induction-to-delivery interval was 17.5 hours in the vaginal group compared to 33 hours in the oral group (p = 0.0003). The percentages of women who delivered at 24 and 48 hours were 93% and 100% in the vaginal administration group and 19% and 70% in the oral administration group (p < 0.05). No significant differences in complication rates or side effects were noted between the two groups     

Oral versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of oral misoprostol (50 microg) administered every 3 hours compared to vaginal misoprostol (50 microg) administered every 6 hours for induction of labor. STUDY DESIGN: In this double-blind randomized trial, 126 women received misoprostol (50 microg) either orally every 3 hours or vaginally every 6 hours for induction of labor. Outcomes included time from induction to delivery, oxytocin augmentation, incidence of hyperstimulation and tachysystole, mode of delivery, and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: Median time to delivery was shorter in those women who were receiving vaginal misoprostol (vaginal 14.3 hours vs oral 23.1 hours; P =.0004) and more women in the oral group required oxytocin augmentation of labor (73% vs 42%) (RR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.29 to 3.06). The incidence of hyperstimulation was similar between the groups, but there was an increased incidence of tachysystole in the vaginal group (26.5% vs 9.7%)(RR, 2.74; 95% CI, 1.16 to 6.51). There was no difference between the groups with respect to mode of delivery or neonatal outcome. CONCLUSION: Vaginal misoprostol administered every 6 hours is more effective for induction of labor than oral misoprostol administered every 3 hours. The higher rates of tachysystole with use of vaginal misoprostol in the current study warrant further investigation.     

A randomised controlled trial of 6 and 12 hourly administration of vaginal misoprostol for second trimester pregnancy termination

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of vaginal misoprostol administered 6 or 12 hourly for second trimester pregnancy termination. DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial. SETTING: University teaching hospital. SAMPLE: Two hundred and seventy-nine pregnant women at gestations between 14 and 26 weeks undergoing pregnancy termination. METHODS: Women were randomised to receive 600-microg misoprostol tablets vaginally either every 6 hours or every 12 hours until abortion occurred. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Induction-abortion interval, success rate within 24 and 48 hours and adverse effects. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the median induction to abortion interval 6 hours (16 hours) and 12 hours (16 hours; P= 0.80). The total dose of misoprostol was higher in the 6-hour group (1800 vs 1200 microg). The cumulative abortion rates within 24 hours were 74% and 67% and within 48 hours 94% and 92%, in the 6- and 12-hour groups, respectively. Fever was more common in the 6-hour group (53%) versus the 12-hour group (31%; P < 0.001). The incidence of nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, severe bleeding and abdominal pain were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Misoprostol (600 microg) administered at 12-hour intervals was associated with fewer adverse effects and was as effective as a 6-hour interval.     

Vaginal misoprostol for pre-abortion cervical priming: is there an optimal evacuation time interval?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal evacuation time interval in the use of vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming before first trimester termination of pregnancy. DESIGN: Prospective double-blind randomised study. SETTING: Fertility Control Centre, National University Hospital, Singapore. METHODS: Sixty healthy nulliparous women requesting legal termination of pregnancy between 6 and 11 weeks of gestation were randomly allocated to either the 400 microg or 600 microg misoprostol group. Vacuum aspiration was performed after three hours in the 400 microg group and at the end of two hours in the women given 600 microg misoprostol. Using Hegar's dilator, degree of cervical dilatation before operation was measured. Other parameters assessed included the amount of additional dilatation required (if < Hegar 8), pre-operative and intra-operative blood loss, and associated side effects. RESULTS: For the 600 microg group, only five women (16.7%) achieved a cervical dilatation of > or = 8 mm, compared with 28 women (93.3%) in the 400 microg group. Using the 400 microg misoprostol group as a baseline, the odds ratio was 0.014 (95% CI 0.003-0.080) for 600 microg for successful pre-operative cervical dilatation of > or = 8 mm. The mean cervical dilatation for 400 and 600 microg misoprostol was 8.1 mm and 6.6 mm, respectively (P < 0.001). Despite the shorter evacuation time interval of two hours, the 600 microg dose was associated with an increase in side effects such as vaginal bleeding, abdominal pain and a fever of > 38.0 degrees C. However, other than abdominal pain, no significant differences in the frequency of these side effects were shown. CONCLUSION: Use of 400 microg misoprostol with a minimal evacuation time interval of three hours still appears the optimal dosage and evacuation time for cervical priming before first trimester termination of pregnancy.     

A comparison of 100 microg oral misoprostol every 3 hours and 6 hours for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of 100 microg oral misoprostol for induction of labor between the regimen of 3 hour and 6 hour interval administration. METHODS: Singleton pregnancies indicated for induction of labor between 34 and 42 weeks of gestation in the condition of unfavorable cervix (Bishop score < or = 4) and no contraindication for prostaglandins therapy were recruited into the study. All pregnant women were randomly assigned to receive 100 microg oral misoprostol every 3 hours or 6 hours until the cervix was favorable for amniotomy, spontaneous rupture of membranes or active labor occurred. RESULTS: The mean time interval from induction to vaginal delivery was significantly shorter in the 3 hour interval group, compared with the 6 hour interval group (13.82 +/- 6.98h and 17.66 +/- 7.48h, P = 0.0019). There was no significant difference between the groups with regard to mode of delivery, analgesic requirement, maternal complication and neonatal outcome. CONCLUSIONS: 100 microg oral misoprostol every 3 hours is more effective for labor induction than every 6 hours but there was no difference in mode of delivery, analgesic requirement, maternal complications and neonatal outcome. A dose of 100 microg misoprostol orally every 3 hours seems to be the optimum regimen and the new option for labor induction. However, further study should be performed.     

Prospective randomized clinical trial of inpatient cervical ripening with stepwise oral misoprostol vs vaginal misoprostol

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of stepwise oral misoprostol vs vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening before induction of labor. STUDY DESIGN: Two hundred and four women between 32 to 42 weeks of gestation with an unfavorable cervix (Bishop score < or = 6) and an indication for labor induction were randomized to receive oral or vaginal misoprostol every 4 hours up to 4 doses. The oral misoprostol group received 50 microg initially followed by 100 microg in each subsequent dose. The vaginal group received 25 microg in each dose. The primary outcome was the interval from first misoprostol dose to delivery. Patient satisfaction and side effects were assessed by surveys completed after delivery. RESULTS: Ninety-three (45.6%) women received oral misoprostol; 111 (54.4%) received vaginal misoprostol. There was no difference in the average interval from the first dose of misoprostol to delivery in the oral (21.1 + 7.9 hrs) and vaginal (21.5 + 11.0 hrs, P = NS) misoprostol groups. The incidence of hyperstimulation in the oral group was 2.2% vs 5.4% in the vaginal group, P = NS. Eighteen patients in the oral group (19.4%) and 36 (32.4%) in the vaginal group underwent cesarean section (P < .05). This difference was attributed to better tolerance of more doses of misoprostol by the women in the oral group. There was no difference in side effects (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, shivering) between groups. Fourteen percent of women in the vaginal group versus 7.5% in the oral group were dissatisfied with the use of misoprostol (P = NS). CONCLUSION: Stepwise oral misoprostol (50 microg followed by 100 microg) appears to be as effective as vaginal misoprostol (25 microg) for cervical ripening with a low incidence of hyperstimulation, no increase in side effects, a high rate of patient satisfaction, and is associated with a lower cesarean section rate.     

Randomized comparison of oral misoprostol and oxytocin for labor induction in term prelabor membrane rupture

OBJECTIVES: To compare labor induction intervals between oral misoprostol and intravenous oxytocin in women who present at term with premature rupture of membranes. METHODS: One hundred eight women were randomly assigned to misoprostol 50 microg orally every 4 hours as needed or intravenous oxytocin. The primary outcome measure was time from induction to vaginal delivery. Sample size was calculated using a two-tailed alpha of 0.05 and power of 80%. RESULTS: Baseline demographic data, including maternal age, gestation, parity, Bishop score, birth weight, and group B streptococcal status, were similar. The mean time +/-standard deviation to vaginal birth with oral misoprostol was 720+/-382 minutes compared with 501+/-389 minutes with oxytocin (P = .007). The durations of the first, second, and third stages of labor were similar. There were no differences in maternal secondary outcomes, including cesarean birth (eight and seven, respectively), infection, maternal satisfaction with labor, epidural use, perineal trauma, manual placental removal, or gastrointestinal side effects. Neonatal outcomes including cord pH, Apgar scores, infection, and admission to neonatal intensive care unit were not different. CONCLUSION: Although labor induction with oral misoprostol was effective, oxytocin resulted in a shorter induction-to-delivery interval. Active labor intervals and other maternal and neonatal outcomes were similar.     

The optimization of intravaginal misoprostol dosing schedules in second-trimester pregnancy termination

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and side effects of 3 doses of intravaginal misoprostol for second-trimester pregnancy termination. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial of 150 women who underwent pregnancy termination between 14 and 30 weeks of gestation. Three intravaginal misoprostol regimens were compared: 200 microg misoprostol at 6-hour intervals (group 1), 400 microg misoprostol at 6-hour intervals (group 2), and a loading dose of 600 microg misoprostol followed by 200 microg at 6-hour intervals (group 3). RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the median time to achieve delivery among the 3 groups: group 1 (18.2 hours [IQ, 13.3-32.5 hours]) vs group 2 (15.1 hours [IQ, 10.9-23.7 hours]) vs group 3 (13.2 hours [IQ, 11.2-21.7 hours]; P =.035). Fifty-nine percent of the women in group 1, 76% of the women in group 2, and 80% of the women in group 3 delivered within 24 hours (P =.013). There were 7.8% of the women in group 1, 0% of the women in group 2, and 2% of the women in group 3 who were undelivered at 48 hours (P =.02). There was an increase in the incidence of fever in the first 12 hours (P =.038) and in the incidence of vomiting within 3 hours of the initial dose (P =.048) in group 3 compared with the other groups. CONCLUSION: Intravaginal misoprostol 400 microg at 6-hour intervals appears to be the preferred regimen for second-trimester pregnancy termination, with a shorter commencement to delivery interval than the 200 microg regimen and fewer maternal side-effects than the 600 microg loading dose regimen.     

A randomised trial of two regimens of vaginal misoprostol to manage termination of pregnancy of up to 16 weeks

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and side-effects of two regimens of vaginal misoprostol for pregnancy termination of up to 16 weeks. METHODS: A randomised clinical trial of medical pregnancy termination of up to 16 weeks was conducted. A hundred pregnant women requesting legal termination of pregnancy were randomised into two groups to receive either 200 microg (50 women) or 400 microg (50 women)--vaginal misoprostol every six hours up to four doses. Outcome of abortion and side-effects were assessed. RESULTS: The groups were similar in maternal age, gestational age, parity and indication for pregnancy termination. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in abortion (P = 0.084) and mean induction to abortion time (P = 0.35). However, the side-effects in the 400 microg group were significantly higher than in the 200 microg group (P = 0.000). Conclusion: In pregnancy termination of up to 16 weeks, 200 microg vaginal misoprostol every six hours up to four doses was as effective as 400 microg, but side-effects were more common in 400 microg regimen.     

Excessive uterine activity accompanying induced labor

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence and timing of excessive uterine activity accompanying induction of labor with misoprostol using different routes (oral or vaginal) and forms (intact tablet or crushed) and to compare these with dinoprostone gel, oxytocin, and spontaneous labor. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 519 women at term who had labor induced and 86 women at term in spontaneous labor. Induction agents included misoprostol, dinoprostone, or oxytocin. Fetal heart rate and uterine activity tracings were analyzed independently by three maternal-fetal medicine physicians. The diagnosis of tachysystole or hyperstimulation required the agreement of two or more reviewers. RESULTS: The incidence of tachysystole was highest with misoprostol administered by vaginal tablet (misoprostol vaginal tablet 50 microg every 4 hours, 48.6%; vaginal tablet crushed 50 microg and suspended in hydroxyethyl gel every 4 hours, 30.7%, P =.009; oral tablet 50 microg every 4 hours, 22.2%, P =.001; oral tablet crushed 50 microg every 4 hours, 15.5%, P <.001; dinoprostone gel, 33.0%, P =.022; intravenous oxytocin, 30.2%, P =.027; and spontaneous onset of labor, 23.3%, P <.001). Hyperstimulation occurred more often with dinoprostone gel (16.5%) than with other forms of induction or spontaneous labor. Hyperstimulation occurred significantly more often with vaginal misoprostol crushed tablet (7.9%) and vaginal misoprostol intact tablet (7.6%) than with crushed oral misoprostol (1.0%) (P =.016 and.018, respectively). There was a shorter time to tachysystole with increasing doses of vaginal misoprostol tablet (P =.01). CONCLUSION: The incidence of tachysystole and hyperstimulation, and time to tachysystole, varied depending on the route and form of misoprostol given.     

Induction of labor with oral misoprostol for premature rupture of membranes at term in women with unfavorable cervix: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral misoprostol for labor induction in women with term premature rupture of membranes (PROM) and an unfavorable cervix. METHODS: We randomized 130 women with PROM of < or =4 h to either oral misoprostol, 50 microg, or a placebo given every 4 h for up to three doses. Intravenous oxytocin was initiated if active labor did not begin within 12 h. RESULTS: Sixty-four women received oral misoprostol and 66 received placebo. The PROM-to-delivery interval was shorter with misoprostol than with placebo (13.7+/-5.8 vs. 20.3+/-6.8 h, respectively, P<0.05). Misoprostol significantly reduced the need for oxytocin (28.1 vs. 72.7%, P<0.001) and antibiotics (25 vs. 69.7%, P<0.001). No significant differences in cesarean section or hyperstimulation rate were noted. CONCLUSION: Oral misoprostol given to women with unfavorable cervix soon after term PROM significantly reduces the induction-to-delivery time and the need for oxytocin and antibiotics.     

Misoprostol and first trimester pregnancy termination

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of vaginal administration of 800 microg misoprostol as a single dose without performing post expulsion systematic curettage in first trimester pregnancy termination. METHOD: 113 women, aged 16-44, who requested first trimester pregnancy termination, received 800 microg of vaginal misoprostol. All examined women were divided into two groups depending on gestation age. The first group included of 67 women with up to nine weeks and the second of 46 with up to 12 weeks of pregnancy. RESULTS: Abortion occurred within 24 hours and was completed in 74.3% of the cases. The mean induction-abortion interval was 5.9 +/- 1.7 hours (median 5.5 hours). Side-effects were experienced by 24 women (21.2%). There was no significant difference between groups in the success rate, induction-abortion interval, number of previous deliveries and side-effects. CONCLUSION: Misoprostol is an effective agent for first trimester medical termination.     

Randomized controlled trial of misoprostol for second-trimester pregnancy termination associated with fetal malformation

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare the effectiveness, women's views of the termination procedure, and success of umbilical cord culture for vaginal and oral misoprostol versus intra-amniotic prostaglandin PGF(2alpha) for second-trimester pregnancy termination (STPT). STUDY DESIGN: We randomized 217 women, 15 to 24 weeks' gestation, into 3 groups. Oral (OM) and vaginal (VM) misoprostol groups received 400 microg of misoprostol every 4 hours for 24 hours. The intra-amniotic PGF(2alpha) (IAPG) group received 40 mg of PGF(2alpha) followed by oxytocin infusion. Women completed self-administered questionnaires 3 weeks after the termination procedure. Umbilical cord samples were collected at delivery for karyotype analysis. The primary outcome was the time from start of the procedure to placental delivery. Secondary outcomes were maternal complications, women's acceptance of the termination procedure, and success rates of umbilical cord culture. RESULTS: The time was longer for the OM group (30.5+/-14.4 hours) compared with the VM group (18.3+/-8.2 hours) and the IAPG group (21.1+/-10.2 hours), P<.001 for both comparisons. Women in the VM group reported being more willing to repeat the termination method in the future and reported fewer side effects than those in the other groups, P<.001. Failure rates for umbilical cord cultures were 9.6%, 17.0%, and 45.6% for the VM, OM, and IAPG groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Oral misoprostol is less effective than intra-amniotic PGF(2alpha) or vaginal misoprostol for STPT. Women report vaginal misoprostol more acceptable than other methods. Umbilical cord culture failure rate is highest in the IAPG group.     

Combined administration of misoprostol in the first and second trimester missed abortion cases

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the effectiveness and adverse effects of combined (vaginal + oral) administration of misoprostol in missed abortion cases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 48 missed abortion cases between 8 and 20 weeks of gestation were enrolled in this study. Misoprostol-induced medical abortion was planned; the first dose (200 microg) was administered intravaginally and subsequent doses (200 microg each) orally every following hour. A maximum of six doses (1200 microg) were used. Revision curettage was performed on all subjects who aborted. RESULTS: The mean time interval from the first dose of misoprostol until the abortion was 6.27 +/- 3.02 hours. The success rate was 95% for the whole group. We observed misoprostol-related trembling in one patient and fever in two patients. CONCLUSION: We believe that our low-dose combined misoprostol protocol is a safe, effective and well-tolerated method with minimal adverse effects for the termination of both first and second trimester pregnancy losses.