Antifibrinolytic therapy and perioperative blood loss in cancer patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery

BACKGROUND: Aprotinin has been reported to reduce blood loss and transfusion requirements in patients having major orthopedic operations. Data on whether epsilon amino-caproic acid (EACA) is effective in this population are sparse. METHODS: Sixty-nine adults with malignancy scheduled for either pelvic, extremity or spine surgery during general anesthesia entered this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, and received either intravenous aprotinin (n = 23), bolus of 2 x 10(6) kallikrein inactivator units (KIU), followed by an infusion of 5 x 10(5) KIU/h, or EACA (n = 22), bolus of 150 mg/kg, followed by a 15 mg/kg/h infusion or saline placebo (n = 24) during surgery. Our goal was to determine whether prophylactic EACA or aprotinin therapy would reduce perioperative blood loss (intraoperative + first 48h) >30% when compared to placebo. RESULTS: The mean age of the study population was 52 +/- 17 yr. The groups did not differ in age, duration of surgery, perioperative blood loss or number of packed erythrocyte units transfused. When compared to the placebo group, the two treated groups had a significantly lower D-Dimer level immediately after surgery, P < 0.01. CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of this study, we were unable to find a clinical benefit to using aprotinin or EACA to reduce perioperative blood loss or transfusion requirements during major orthopedic surgery in cancer patients.     

Aprotinin in major orthopedic surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Aprotinin therapy is a promising strategy for reducing blood loss and blood transfusion requirements. The efficacy and safety of aprotinin in orthopedic surgery, however, remain controversial. We searched electronic databases for randomized controlled trials on the efficacy and safety of the use of aprotinin in orthopedic surgery. Thirteen trials that included a total of 506 patients who underwent major orthopedic surgery were analyzed. The pooled intraoperative and perioperative blood loss was significantly less in the aprotinin-treated patients than in the control patients (weighted mean difference [WMD] for intraoperative blood loss = -229 mL, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -367 to -91 mL, P = 0.0011; WMD for perioperative blood loss = -557 mL; 95% CI = -860 to -254 mL; P < 0.0001). The pooled amounts of red blood cell (RBC) units (U) transfused intraoperatively and perioperatively were significantly less in the aprotinin-treated patients than in the control patients (WMD for intraoperative RBC U = -1.1 U; 95% CI = -1.7 to -0.4 U; P = 0.0001; WMD for perioperative RBC U = -1.1 U; 95% CI = -1.7 to -0.5 U; P < 0.0001). Aprotinin was not associated with an increased incidence of deep vein thrombosis (odds ratio = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.14 to 1.05, P = 0.061). The authors conclude that aprotinin reduces the intraoperative and perioperative blood loss and allogeneic blood transfusion requirement and may not be associated with increased risk of deep vein thrombosis in the presence of pharmacological or mechanical prophylaxis in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery.     

Antifibrinolytic Therapy and Perioperative Blood Loss in Cancer Patients Undergoing Major Orthopedic Surgery

Background: Aprotinin has been reported to reduce blood loss and transfusion requirements in patients having major orthopedic operations. Data on whether [epsilon] amino-caproic acid (EACA) is effective in this population are sparse.

Methods: Sixty-nine adults with malignancy scheduled for either pelvic, extremity or spine surgery during general anesthesia entered this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, and received either intravenous aprotinin (n = 23), bolus of 2 x 106 kallikrein inactivator units (KIU), followed by an infusion of 5 x 105 KIU/h, or EACA (n = 22), bolus of 150 mg/kg, followed by a 15 mg/kg/h infusion or saline placebo (n = 24) during surgery. Our goal was to determine whether prophylactic EACA or aprotinin therapy would reduce perioperative blood loss (intraoperative + first 48h) >30% when compared to placebo.

Results: The mean age of the study population was 52 +/- 17 yr. The groups did not differ in age, duration of surgery, perioperative blood loss or number of packed erythrocyte units transfused. When compared to the placebo group, the two treated groups had a significantly lower D-Dimer level immediately after surgery, P < 0.01.     

Reduced blood loss by aprotinin in thoracic surgical operations associated with high risk of bleeding. A placebo-controlled, randomized phase IV study.

OBJECTIVE: Although the blood-saving effect of aprotinin has been well documented in cardiac surgery and lung transplantation, its use in lung surgery has received less attention. We present our experience with the intraoperative application of aprotinin in lung resections with a predicted high risk of bleeding. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients undergoing major thoracic surgical procedures were randomized into treatment and placebo groups. The treatment group (n=18) received a bolus of 2 x 10(6) kallikrein inhibitor units (KIU) of aprotinin followed by 5 x 10(5) KIU/h during surgery. The placebo group (n=20) received an isotonic saline infusion instead. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the groups concerning diagnosis, co-morbidity, age, sex, height, and weight. The mean intraoperative blood loss in the treatment group was significantly reduced (342 vs. 808 ml, P<0024), postoperative blood loss was also reduced (623 vs. 1282 ml, P<0.0007) and the need for blood transfusion was less (14 vs. 60, n.s.). No severe side effects of aprotinin were registered. Re-thoracotomy was necessary in two patients of the placebo group because of postoperative bleeding. CONCLUSION: Aprotinin reduces the perioperative blood loss and the need for blood transfusion in thoracic surgical procedures in patients with an increased risk of bleeding.     

High-dose aprotinin reduces activation of hemostasis,allogeneic blood requirement,and duration of postoperative ventilation in pediatric cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND: Though multiple studies have affirmed the effectiveness of aprotinin in reducing blood loss in adult cardiac surgery, the possible benefit in pediatric cardiac surgery is controversial. METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled study, the efficacy of aprotinin in attenuating the hemostatic and inflammatory activation during cardiopulmonary bypass in 60 patients weighing less than 10 kg was investigated. Secondary endpoints were the influence of aprotinin on the reduction of blood loss and allogeneic blood requirement, as well as postoperative oxygenation and length of mechanical ventilation. Aprotinin was administered in a high-dose of 3 x 10(4) KIU/kg plus a bolus of 5 x 10(5) KIU (not weight adjusted) added to the pump prime. RESULTS: Aprotinin plasma concentration at the end of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was with 184 +/- 45 KIU/mL, within the targeted range of 200 KIU/mL. Coagulation and fibrinolysis were suppressed (F1.2 1 hour after CPB: 5.35 +/- 2.9 nmol/L vs 14.5 +/- 23.1 nmol/L; D-dimer 1 hour after CPB: 0.63 +/- 0.6 ng/mL vs 2.3 +/- 3.1 ng/mL; p < 0.05), inflammatory markers (interleukin [IL]-6, IL-8, IL-10) increased over time without significant differences between the groups, and only complement C3a activation was significantly attenuated at the end of CPB in the aprotinin group. Chest tube drainage was significantly reduced (24 hours: median 13.5 [IQR 12.2] mL/kg vs 19.4 [8.2] mL/kg; p < 0.05). All patients received one unit of packed cells to prime the heart lung machine. A second unit was needed significantly less often in the aprotinin group (13% vs 47%; p < 0.05). Postoperative oxygenation (pO2/FIO2 172 [IQR 128] mm Hg vs 127 [74]; p < 0.05) improved, and the time on ventilator was shorter in the aprotinin group (median 45 hours [IQR 94] vs 101 [IQR 74]; p < 0.05). No side effects were attributable to the use of aprotinin. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose aprotinin effectively attenuated hemostatic activation and reduced blood loss and transfusion requirement in pediatric cardiac surgery. Postoperative ventilation was also shortened in the aprotinin group.     

Influence of high-dose aprotinin treatment on blood loss and coagulation patterns in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization.

Intraoperative administration of the proteinase inhibitor aprotinin causes reduction in blood loss and homologous blood requirement in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. To ascertain the blood-saving effect of aprotinin and to obtain further information about the mode of action, 40 patients undergoing primary myocardial revascularization were randomly assigned to receive either aprotinin or placebo treatment. Aprotinin was given as a bolus of 2 x 10(6) kallikrein inactivator units (KIU) before surgery followed by a continuous infusion of 5 x 10(5) KIU/h during surgery. Additionally, 2 x 10(6) KIU were added to the pump prime. Strict criteria were used to obtain a homogeneous patient selection. Total blood loss was reduced from 1,431 +/- 760 ml in the control group to 738 +/- 411 ml in the aprotinin group (P less than 0.05) and the homologous blood requirement from 838 +/- 963 ml to 163 +/- 308 ml (P less than 0.05). In the control group, 2.3 +/- 2.2 U of homologous blood or blood products were given, and in the aprotinin group, 0.63 +/- 0.96 U were given (P less than 0.05). Twenty-five percent of patients in the control group and 63% in the aprotinin group did not receive banked blood or homologous blood products. The activated clotting time as an indicator of inhibition of the contact phase of coagulation was significantly increased before heparinization in the aprotinin group (141 +/- 13 s vs. 122 +/- 25 s) and remained significantly increased until heparin was neutralized after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Low-dose aprotinin is ineffective to treat excessive bleeding after cardiopulmonary bypass

BACKGROUND: Uncontrolled clinical experience at our institution suggested that low-dose aprotinin could control excessive bleeding after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). A randomized clinical trial was conducted to determine the efficacy of low-dose aprotinin in the treatment of hemorrhage after cardiac surgery. METHODS: One hundred seventy-one patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB were included. Forty-four patients (26%) bled significantly in the intensive care unit (>100 mL/h) and received either aprotinin (200,000 KIU bolus + 100,000 KIU/h for 8 hours) or placebo in addition to our standard management of excessive bleeding. RESULTS: Median bleeding before study drug administration was not different between aprotinin (200 mL) and placebo (212.5 mL) groups. Bleeding decreased significantly with time and similarly in both groups. Ninety-five percent of patients required transfusions in both groups. Median blood products transfused were 13 and 8 units per patient in the aprotinin and placebo groups respectively (p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: Routine administration of low-dose aprotinin as part of the treatment protocol to control hemorrhage after CPB does not reduce bleeding or transfusion requirements and, therefore, cannot be recommended.     

Aprotinin Decreases Blood Loss and Homologous Transfusions in Patients Undergoing Major Orthopedic Surgery

Background: Major orthopedic surgery can be associated with dramatic blood loss, thereby requiring high-volume homologous transfusions in patients unable to benefit from blood salvage techniques. The effect of aprotinin on blood loss and transfusion requirements during orthopedic surgery for either the resection of malignancies of the removal of infected hardware was prospectively studied.

Methods: Twenty-three patients scheduled for orthopedic surgery of the hip, femur, or pelvis for sepsis or malignant tumors, all under general anesthesia, were randomly allocated to receive during operation, in a blinded manner, either aprotinin administered as a bolus of 1.10 sup 6 kallikrein inactivation units (KIU) followed by an infusion of 5 x 105 KIU/h, or the equivalent volume of saline. The anesthesia and perioperative management, as well as the designated transfusion criteria, were standardized. The total blood loss of each patient was evaluated using intraoperative suction losses, sponge weights, and postoperative volumetric drainage. Homologous transfusion requirements were noted. Hemoglobin and hematocrit measures, as well as coagulation and fibrinolytic pathway explorations, were performed before and after surgery. Deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis was applied, and the incidence of this complication was assessed.

Results: Twelve patients received aprotinin. Aprotinin reduced the total blood loss from a median of 5,305 ml (range, 3,000-9,770 ml) to a median of 1,783 ml (range, 1,140-4,955 ml; P < 0.05). A blood loss reduction of 56% during surgery and 68% on discharge from the postanesthesia care unit was observed. Seven units (range, 4-16) of packed erythrocytes were transfused per patient in the placebo group, and 3 (range, 2-5) were transfused in the aprotinin group (P < 0.05). In the aprotinin group, platelet counts were higher, and postoperative prothrombin times and D. Dimer values were lower. The activated partial thromboplastin time values showed no significant difference between the two groups. No side effects were observed in the aprotinin group. A deep venous thrombosis developed in one patient in the placebo group.     

Variability of plasma aprotinin concentrations in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVES: Infants and children undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass for repair of congenital heart defects are at substantial risk for excessive bleeding, contributing greatly to morbidity and mortality. Aprotinin significantly reduces bleeding and transfusion requirements in adults but is of indeterminate value for pediatric patients. The aim of this study was to determine plasma aprotinin concentrations in these patients with a functional aprotinin assay. METHODS: Thirty patients less than 16 years of age scheduled for cardiac surgery with aprotinin were enrolled. Aprotinin was administered as a 25,000 KIU/kg bolus, 35,000 KIU/kg cardiopulmonary bypass prime, and 12,500 KIU.kg(-1).h(-1) continuous infusion. Blood samples for aprotinin concentrations (kallikrein-inhibiting units/milliliter) were obtained before aprotinin; 5 minutes post-bolus; 5 minutes after cardiopulmonary bypass initiation; 30 and 60 minutes on cardiopulmonary bypass; on discontinuation of aprotinin; 1 hour after aprotinin discontinuation; and 4 hours after permanent separation from cardiopulmonary bypass. For analysis, patients were grouped according to weight (<10 kg, 10-20 kg, >20 kg). Differences between weight groups were assessed using an exact test for categoric variables and 1-way analysis of variance for continuous variables. RESULTS: Aprotinin concentrations differed significantly across weight groups. Five minutes after aprotinin bolus and initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass, there was significant correlation between weight and aprotinin concentration (r =.57, P =.003; r =.69, P =.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: A functional assay reveals significant variability in aprotinin concentration for pediatric patients using current weight-based aprotinin dosing. Additional investigation is necessary to determine target aprotinin concentration dosing regimens to provide better efficacy.     

A randomized trial of aprotinin (Trasylol) on blood loss, blood product requirement, and myocardial injury in total arterial grafting

BACKGROUND: Total arterial grafting is increasingly preferred in coronary artery bypass grafting, but it increases blood loss. Aprotinin (Trasylol; Bayer Corp, Leverkusen, Germany) reduces blood loss in cardiac surgery but has not been subjected to a randomized trial in total arterial grafting. METHODS: A single-center, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial of aprotinin administration in total arterial grafting was performed. The primary outcome variable was postoperative blood loss, and the secondary outcome variable was the number of units of donor blood or coagulant products transfused. The incidence of myocardial injury was determined from serial measurements of cardiac troponin T and creatine kinase-MB and renal injury from serum creatinine. RESULTS: The placebo group (n = 34) and aprotinin group (n = 36) were similar with respect to all preoperative and intraoperative comparisons. One patient in each group underwent reexploration for bleeding. Open-label aprotinin was administered to 9 patients in the placebo group (26%) and to 2 patients in the aprotinin group (6%). There was a highly significant reduction in the median (interquartile range) blood loss in the aprotinin group compared with the placebo group (785 mL [590-1025 mL] vs 1525 mL [1175-1920 mL], respectively). Similarly, the aprotinin group demonstrated a marked reduction in the need for blood transfusion (77% vs 39%; P =.0001), the mean number of transfused blood units (2.6 vs 0.8, P <.001), and the number of patients requiring coagulant products (24% vs 3%; P <.001). There was no difference in myocardial injury in the 2 groups. Four patients in the aprotinin group had persistently elevated creatinine levels in the postoperative period (3 of whom had elevated preoperative creatinine levels and perioperative complications). CONCLUSIONS: Aprotinin significantly reduces blood loss and the need for blood component transfusion in patients undergoing total arterial grafting without increasing the risk of myocardial injury. Aprotinin should be considered routinely in patients undergoing total arterial grafting but cautiously in patients with an elevated preoperative creatinine level.     

Effect of aprotinin on postoperative blood loss in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) enables a reduction in postoperative complications, particularly bleeding and transfusion. Nevertheless, a significant percentage of patients still needs transfusion. The effect of antifibrinolytic therapy on postoperative bleeding as part of OPCAB is still not widely described. The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential benefit of aprotinin in OPCAB. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective comparative study with a historical control group. Consecutive patients undergoing off-pump coronary bypass were divided in two groups: 40 patients were operated without any antifibinolytic drug (group C); 40 patients received aprotinin (group A) during surgery. Patients in group A received a bolus of 2 x 10(6) KIU during 30 minutes, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.5 x 10(6) KIU per hour until the end of surgery. The same protocol was used during the whole study period. RESULTS: Preoperative data of the two groups did not differ except for the number of grafts performed, which was higher in group A. Prothrombin time and activated clotting time increased in both groups after surgery. The use of packed red blood cells or fresh frozen plasma was not significantly different between both groups. Postoperative blood loss was significantly reduced in the aprotinin group (540 mL +/- 320 vs. 770 mL +/- 390, p = 0.006). No increase in postoperative troponin values was found in group A. CONCLUSIONS: Aprotinin significantly reduced postoperative blood loss without reducing the transfusion rate. Aprotinin was not associated with any increase in postoperative complications.     

Aprotinin decreases exposure to allogeneic blood during primary unilateral total hip replacement

BACKGROUND: Aprotinin, a hemostatic agent, regulates fibrinolysis, modulates the intrinsic coagulation pathway, stabilizes platelet function, and exhibits anti-inflammatory properties through inhibition of serine proteases, such as trypsin, plasmin, and kallikrein. Aprotinin has been used successfully for many years in cardiac operations, and there have been preliminary investigations of its use in hip replacement operations. The objectives of this multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of aprotinin as a blood-sparing agent in patients undergoing an elective primary unilateral total hip replacement and to examine its effect on the prevalence of deep-vein thrombosis in this population. METHODS: Seventy-three patients received a placebo; seventy-six patients, a low dose of aprotinin (a load of 500,000 kallikrein inhibitor units [KIU]); seventy-five, a medium dose of aprotinin (a load of 1,000,000 KIU, with infusion of 250,000 KIU per hour); and seventy-seven patients, a high dose of aprotinin (a load of 2,000,000 KIU, with infusion of 500,000 KIU per hour). The end points for the determination of efficacy were transfusion requirements and blood loss. Patients received standard prophylaxis against deep-vein thrombosis and underwent compression ultrasonography with color Doppler imaging of the proximal and distal venous systems of both legs to evaluate for the presence of deep-vein thrombosis. RESULTS: Aprotinin reduced the percentages of patients who required any form of blood transfusion (47 percent of the patients managed with a placebo needed a transfusion compared with 28 percent of those managed with low-dose aprotinin [p = 0.02],27 percent of those managed with high-dose aprotinin [p = 0.008], and 40 percent of those managed with medium-dose aprotinin [p = 0.5]). Only 6 percent (twelve) of the 212 patients treated with aprotinin required allogeneic blood compared with 15 percent (ten) of the sixty-eight patients treated with the placebo (p = 0.03). Aprotinin decreased the estimated intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.02 for the low-dose group, p = 0.04 for the medium-dose group, and p = 0.1 for the high-dose group), the measured postoperative drainage volume (p = 0.4 for the low-dose group, p = 0.006 for the medium-dose group, and p = 0.000 for the high-dose group), and the mean reduction in the hemoglobin level on the second postoperative day (thirty-four grams per liter for the placebo group, twenty-eight grams per liter for the low-dose group [p = 0.000], twenty-six grams per liter for the medium-dose group [p = 0.000], and twenty-three grams per liter for the high-dose group [p = 0.0001). The rate of deep-vein thrombosis was similar for all groups. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that aprotinin is safe and effective for use as a hemostatic agent in primary unilateral total hip replacements. In patients who are at high risk of receiving allogeneic blood, use of aprotinin may be of particular clinical and economic benefit.     

The efficacy and safety of aprotinin for hemostasis during intracranial surgery

OBJECT: The aim of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of prophylactic high-dose intravenous aprotinin in reducing intraoperative blood loss in the neurosurgical population. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in parallel groups in two regional neurosurgical departments. One hundred patients with a preoperative diagnosis of intracranial meningioma or vestibular schwannoma subsequently confirmed on histological studies were included. All patients were older than 18 years of age, pregnancy had been excluded, there was no history of bleeding diathesis, no previous exposure to aprotinin, and no ingestion of antiplatelet or anticoagulant medications within the 2 weeks preceding surgery. Aprotinin was administered in doses of 30,000 kallikrein-inhibiting units (KIU)/kg body weight on induction of anesthesia and was continued as an infusion of 10,000 KIU/kg/hr until surgery was complete, or for a maximum of 8 hours. Intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion, the Glasgow Outcome Scale score, and the Index of Independence were measured, and screening for deep vein thrombosis and the Mini-Mental State Examination were performed. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative blood loss was reduced from 1014 ml (geometric mean) to 508 ml (p = 0.028). Although this study was not designed to evaluate the need for blood transfusion, 37 U of blood was used in 11 patients in the aprotinin group and 58 U in 13 patients in the placebo group (not significant). There were no significant differences in postoperative thrombotic risk or other outcome measures between treatment groups. Aprotinin therefore can be safely used to reduce intraoperative blood loss in patients who are not receiving anticoagulation therapy.     

Reduced Need for Vasopressors in Patients Receiving Aprotinin during Orthotopic Liver Transplantation

Background: Graft reperfusion in orthotopic liver transplantation is often associated with significant hemodynamic changes, including decreased systemic vascular resistance and arterial blood pressure. Vasopressive drugs are often required to maintain adequate perfusion pressure during the early postreperfusion period. The exact mechanism of this postreperfusion syndrome is unknown, but release of bradykinin, a potent vasodilatator, via the kallikrein system may play a role. Aprotinin is a broad-spectrum inhibitor of serine proteases such as kallikrein and therefore may ameliorate the postreperfusion syndrome and reduce the need for vasopressors.

Methods: In a randomized, double-blind study, the authors compared hemodynamic variables (systemic vascular resistance, cardiac index, arterial blood pressure, mean pulmonary artery pressure, central venous pressure) and the requirement of epinephrine during transplantation in 67 patients who received either high-dose aprotinin (2 x 106 kallikrein inhibitor units [KIU] at induction, continuous infusion of 1 x 106 KIU/h, 1 x 106 KIU before reperfusion; n = 24), regular-dose aprotinin (2 x 106 KIU at induction, continuous infusion of 0.5 x 106 KIU/h; n = 21), or placebo (n = 22).

Results: Baseline characteristics were similar for all three groups. Erythrocyte transfusion requirement was significantly higher in the placebo group compared with both aprotinin-treated groups. No major differences in hemodynamic variables were found between the three groups. The total amount of epinephrine (median, range) used during transplantation, however, was significantly lower in patients who received aprotinin (high dose, 20, 0-170 [mu]g; regular dose, 30, 0-140 [mu]g), compared with patients who received placebo (70, 0-2,970 [mu]g;P = 0.0017). This difference was largely attributable to differences in the early postreperfusion period.     

High-dose aprotinin in cardiac surgery: is high-dose high enough? An analysis of 8281 cardiac surgical patients treated with aprotinin

In this retrospective analysis we tested the hypothesis that aprotinin doses of more than 6 x 10(6) kallikrein inhibiting units (KIU) per patient may be more effective in reducing bleeding compared with the high-dose regimen of 5-6 x 10(6) KIU aprotinin. The aprotinin doses administered for 8281 adult cardiac surgical patients were correlated to body weight and time of operation and calculated in KIU per kg body weight and minute of operation. Linear and logistic regression models were designed to detect potential associations between dose and postoperative bleeding, transfusion, and other covariates. The 6-h chest tube drainage in the lowest quartile dosing group was 447 +/- 319 mL (mean +/- sd) compared with 360 +/- 290 mL in the highest quartile dosing group (P < 0.001). The proportion of patients requiring allogeneic blood transfusion was reduced from 55% to 47% comparing the lowest with the highest dosing group (P < 0.01). Aprotinin dose was also an independent predictor for rethoracotomy for surgical hemostasis (1.9% in the highest quartile to 2.4% in the lowest dosing quartile; P < 0.01). The risk of renal failure requiring dialysis (2.3% in the highest dosing group vs 3.3% in the lowest dosing group; P < 0.01) or impairment of renal function (creatinine increase of >or=2 mg/dL postoperatively, 6.4% in the highest dosing group vs 10.0% in the lowest dosing group; P < 0.01) was lower with higher doses of aprotinin. Thus, there was no association between aprotinin dose and renal function. Our results support the hypothesis that a more individualized aprotinin regimen with potentially higher doses may optimize the effectiveness of aprotinin therapy in cardiac surgery.     

Reduced need for vasopressors in patients receiving aprotinin during orthotopic liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: Graft reperfusion in orthotopic liver transplantation is often associated with significant hemodynamic changes, including decreased systemic vascular resistance and arterial blood pressure. Vasopressive drugs are often required to maintain adequate perfusion pressure during the early postreperfusion period. The exact mechanism of this postreperfusion syndrome is unknown, but release of bradykinin, a potent vasodilatator, via the kallikrein system may play a role. Aprotinin is a broad-spectrum inhibitor of serine proteases such as kallikrein and therefore may ameliorate the postreperfusion syndrome and reduce the need for vasopressors. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind study, the authors compared hemodynamic variables (systemic vascular resistance, cardiac index, arterial blood pressure, mean pulmonary artery pressure, central venous pressure) and the requirement of epinephrine during transplantation in 67 patients who received either high-dose aprotinin (2 x 10(6) kallikrein inhibitor units [KIU] at induction, continuous infusion of 1 x 10(6) KIU/h, 1 x 10(6) KIU before reperfusion; n = 24), regular-dose aprotinin (2 x 10(6) KIU at induction, continuous infusion of 0.5 x 10(6) KIU/h; n = 21), or placebo (n = 22). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar for all three groups. Erythrocyte transfusion requirement was significantly higher in the placebo group compared with both aprotinin-treated groups. No major differences in hemodynamic variables were found between the three groups. The total amount of epinephrine (median, range) used during transplantation, however, was significantly lower in patients who received aprotinin (high dose, 20, 0-170 microg; regular dose, 30, 0-140 microg), compared with patients who received placebo (70, 0-2,970 microg; P = 0.0017). This difference was largely attributable to differences in the early postreperfusion period. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic use of aprotinin ameliorates the postreperfusion syndrome in orthotopic liver transplantation, as reflected by a significant reduction in vasopressor requirements.     

Aprotinin reduces postoperative bleeding and the need for blood products in thoracic surgery: results of a randomized double-blind study

Objective: Bleeding complications have been a major concern in certain thoracic surgery operations, especially decortication and pulmonary resection for inflammatory pulmonary infection. Prevention of plasminogen activation and fibrinolysis by aprotinin administration has been shown to reduce perioperative bleeding during operations associated with high blood consumption. Methods: Use of blood products (packed red cells, whole blood), chest tube drainage, analgesic requirement, chest tube duration for the patients undergoing major thoracic operations were recorded. In a double blind randomized fashion, patients were assigned to two groups receiving aprotinin (n=51) at a loading dose of 10⁶ kallikrein inhibitory units (KIU) followed by an infusion of the same dose during chest closure or receiving placebo (n=52). On a daily basis, red-cell percentages of total fluid from drainage bottles were recorded and using the blood hematocrit level of the patient of the day before, the corrected value for the patient's blood volume equivalent of daily drainage was calculated. Results: There was a significant reduction in perioperative use of donor blood (0.98±0.92 vs. 0.45±0.32 unit; P=0.0026), and total chest tube drainage (corrected value for the corresponding blood volume) (28.2±36.9 vs. 76.9±53.3 ml, P=0.0004) (mean±standard deviation) in the aprotinin group. However, aprotinin did not reduce postoperative transfusion or decrease in hematocrit level due to thoracic operations. In high transfusion-risk thoracic surgery patients (patients who underwent decortication, pulmonary resection for inflammatory lung disease and chest wall resection), the perioperative transfusion was only 0.50±1.08 units in aprotinin group, compared with 1.94±0.52 units in control group (P=0.003). Postoperative transfusion was also reduced in aprotinin administrated group (0.53±0.56 vs. 1.38±0.97 units; P=0.02). The mean total blood loss was decreased to nearly one third of the blood loss of the control group (41±28 ml vs. 121±68 ml; P=0.001). Conclusion: Aprotinin significantly reduced perioperative transfusion requirement and postoperative bleeding during major thoracic operations. Aprotinin decreased perioperative transfusion needs. Moreover, patients who were at risk of greater blood loss during and after certain thoracic operations had a greater potential to benefit from prophylactic perioperative aprotinin treatment.     

Aprotinin does not prolong the Sonoclot aprotinin-insensitive activated clotting time

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a new Sonoclot-based, aprotinin-insensitive activated clotting time (aiACT) assay yields stable results over a broad range of aprotinin concentrations. DESIGN: Prospective trial conducted on in vitro blood samples. SETTING: Tertiary-care teaching medical center. PARTICIPANTS: 19 healthy adult volunteers. INTERVENTIONS: Whole blood samples were collected from volunteers. Heparin (2 U/mL) and escalating concentrations of aprotinin of 160 to 500 kallikrein inhibitory units (KIU)/mL were added in vitro. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Celite ACT, kaolin ACT, and aiACT assays were completed. The aiACT showed stable activated clotting time (ACT) results on heparinized, noncitrated blood with added aprotinin (P = nonsignificant). In contrast, celite ACT and kaolin ACT were greatly prolonged when aprotinin was added to heparinized, noncitrated, and citrated blood (P < 0.05). The aiACT had consistent results at all aprotinin concentrations (P = nonsignificant). CONCLUSIONS: Aprotinin (160, 320, and 500 KIU/mL) significantly prolongs the ACT value with celite and kaolin activators but not with the aprotinin-insensitive activator.     

Reduction of blood loss and transfusion requirement by aprotinin in posterior lumbar spine fusion.

Aprotinin reduces blood loss in many orthopedic procedures. In posterior lumbar spine fusion, blood loss results primarily from large vein bleeding and also occurs after the wound is closed. Seventy-two patients undergoing posterior lumbar spine fusion were randomly assigned to large-dose aprotinin therapy or placebo. All patients donated three units of packed red blood cells (RBCs) preoperatively. Postoperative blood loss was harvested from the surgical wound in patients undergoing two- and/or three-level fusion for reinfusion. The target hematocrit for RBC transfusion was 26% if tolerated. Total (intraoperative and 24 h postoperative) blood loss, transfusion requirements, and percentage of transfused patients per treatment group were significantly smaller in the aprotinin group than in the placebo group (1935 +/- 873 vs 2809 +/- 973 mL per patient [P = 0.007]; 42 vs 95 packed RBCs per group [P = 0.001]; 40% vs 81% per group [P = 0.02]). Hematological assessments showed an identically significant (a) intraoperative increase in both thrombin-antithrombin III complexes (TAT) and in activated factor XII (XIIa) and (b) decrease in activated factor VII (VIIa), indicating a similar significant effect on coagulation in patients of both groups (P = 0.9 for intergroup comparisons of postoperative VIIa, XIIa, and TAT). Intraoperative activation of fibrinolysis was significantly less pronounced in the aprotinin group than in the placebo group (P < 0.0001 for intergroup comparison of postoperative D-dimer levels). No adverse drug effects (circulatory disturbances, deep venous thrombosis, alteration of serum creatinine) were detected. Although administered intraoperatively, aprotinin treatment dramatically reduced intraoperative and 24-h postoperative blood loss and autologous transfusion requirements but did not change homologous transfusion in posterior lumbar spine fusion. IMPLICATIONS: In our study, aprotinin therapy significantly decreased autologous, but not homologous, transfusion requirements in posterior lumbar spine fusion.     

Plasma aprotinin concentrations during cardiac surgery: full- versus half-dose regimens

Aprotinin is an effective but expensive drug used during cardiac surgery to reduce blood loss and transfusion requirements. Currently, aprotinin is administered to adults according to a fixed protocol regardless of the patient's weight. The purpose of this study was to determine aprotinin levels in patients receiving full- and half-dose aprotinin regimens by a simple functional aprotinin assay and to design a more individualized aprotinin dosage regimen for cardiac surgical patients. The mean plasma aprotinin concentration peaked 5 min after the initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass (full 401 +/- 92 KIU/mL, half 226 +/- 56 KIU/mL). The mean plasma aprotinin concentration after 60 min on cardiopulmonary bypass was less (full 236 +/- 81 KIU/mL, half 160 +/- 63 KIU/mL). There was large variation in the aprotinin concentration among patients. A statistically significant correlation was found between aprotinin concentration and patient weight (r(2) = 0.67, P < 0.05). Implications: The current dosing schedule for aprotinin results in a large variation in aprotinin plasma concentrations among patients and a large variation within each patient over time. We combined the information provided by our study with that of a previous pharmacokinetic study to develop a potentially improved, weight-based, dosing regime for aprotinin.