Comparison of three prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time reagent systems on the MLA 700 coagulation analyzer.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the difference in prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) results among three reagent systems using a single analyzer instrument. DESIGN: Convenience sample of 100 patient specimens tested in duplicate with three reagent systems: Baxter-Dade, Pacific Hemostasis, and Organon Teknika. SETTING: A tertiary hospital that services other institutions within a three-state area. PATIENTS: Patients were divided into four groups: (1) normal preoperative patients who received no anticoagulants, (2) patients who received warfarin for at least the week immediately before the study, (3) patients who received heparin on the day of the testing, and (4) patients with severe liver disease accompanied by abnormal liver function tests. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Coefficients of correlation of Baxter-Dade results versus the other two systems. RESULTS: PT values were significantly different in normal samples and in warfarin-treated patients. aPTT values were significantly different for normal patients and, for the Organon system only, for heparin-treated patients. When expressed as international normalized ratio (INR) values, taking reagent sensitivity into consideration, the results correlated well. Problems with precipitation when using Organon's system limited its practical utility. CONCLUSION: Compatibility between a reagent system and analyzer instrument should be verified by the manufacturer of the instrument. Use of the INR format produced more accurate and comparable results, allowing safer and more effective dosage adjustments. Laboratories should convert PT and aPTT results to the INR format routinely.     

A comparison of INRs after local calibration of thromboplastin international sensitivity indexes.

There are approximately 300 reagent/instrument combinations for performing prothrombin times/international normalized ratios (PT/INR) in the United States. Manufacturers and laboratories continually struggle to ensure that the International Sensitivity Index (ISI) of their thromboplastin is accurate for assaying PT/INR. OBJECTIVE: This study reports the feasibility of a new method to locally calibrate ISI of thromboplastin using the mechanical STA automated coagulation analyzer (Diagnostica-Stago Inc.) and two photo-optic coagulation analyzers, the BCS (Dade-Behring) and CA-540 (Sysmex). DESIGN: Neoplastine CI+ (CI+) (Diagnostica-Stago Inc); Thromboplastin C+ (TC+); Thromborel S (TRS); and Innovin (I) (Dade-Behring) were used in this study. A mean normal PT (MNPT) was determined for each reagent/instrument combination using samples from 25 normal individuals. Manufacturer instrument specific ISI values were not available for the STA with TC+, TRS and I. The CA540 had no ISI value for CI+ and the BCS system had no manufacturer assigned ISI values for TC+ and I; generic photo-optic and mechanical ISI manufacturer values were used for these two systems. Local on-site calibration was performed using frozen plasma calibrators to determine ISI values for each thromboplastin. Post-calibration, 95 patient samples were assayed for each reagent/instrument system combination using the manufacturer ISI and the local calibrated ISI to determine the INR result. PATIENTS: Patients from whom samples were obtained included five with a lupus anticoagulant, 30 on heparin therapy, and 60 on coumadin therapy. RESULTS: Differences between manufacturer versus local calibrated ISI ranged from 0.9% to 18.9% for normal sample INRs and from 0.8% to 16.4% for patient sample INRs. The number (or proportion) of patient specimens with clinically significantly different INR values (>10.0% difference) ranged from zero for several reagent combinations to more than half (or >50.0%) of those tested for several other combinations. CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that by locally calibrating ISI values, each laboratory may eliminate variability and guesswork between different reagent/instrument systems for ISI values when performing PT/INR assays and potentially improve the clinical accuracy of their patients' PT/INR results.     

Use of lyophilized calibrant plasmas for simplified international normalized ratio determination with a human tissue factor thromboplastin reagent derived from cultured human cells

BACKGROUND: For monitoring of treatment with oral anticoagulants, the clotting time obtained in the prothrombin time (PT) test is transformed to the International Normalized Ratio (INR) with use of a system-specific International Sensitivity Index (ISI). The calibrant plasma procedure (CPP) is an alternative approach to INR calculation based on the use of a set of lyophilized plasmas with assigned INRs. METHODS: With the CPP, a linear relationship is established between log(PT) and log(INR), using orthogonal regression. CPP was validated for Simplastin HTF, a new human tissue factor reagent derived from cultured human cells. CPP precision was assessed as the CV of the slope of the regression line. The accuracy of the CPP was determined by comparing the INR obtained with the CPP with that obtained with the established ISI-based reference method. INRs of the calibrants were assigned by different routes: by manufacturer (consensus labeling) or by use of Simplastin HTF or International Reference Preparations (IRPs; rTF/95 or RBT/90). RESULTS: The mean CV of the CPP regression slope ranged from 1.0% (Simplastin HTF reagent-specific INR) to 2.4% (INR assigned with rTF/95). INRs calculated with the CPP were similar to those obtained with the reference method, but when the routes for assigning INRs to the calibrant plasmas were compared, the mean difference in INR between CPP and the reference method was smaller with Simplastin HTF reagent-specific values. In several (but not all) cases, this difference was significant (P <0.05, t-test). CONCLUSION: CPP can be used for local INR determination, but better precision and accuracy are obtained with reagent-specific INRs compared with INR assignment by consensus labeling or IRP.     

Comparing direct thrombin inhibitors using aPTT, ecarin clotting times, and thrombin inhibitor management testing

BACKGROUND: Patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis may be acutely anticoagulated with direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs). The anticoagulation is typically monitored using the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) or ecarin clotting time (ECT). OBJECTIVE: To compare 14 methods for measuring aPTT, as well as ECT and thrombin inhibitor management test (TIM), in samples containing DTIs. METHODS: DTIs were added to pooled normal plasma to achieve low (0.1-1.2 microg/mL) and high (1.5-8.0 microg/mL) drug concentrations. Each low-concentration DTI sample was tested using all aPTT reagents, while each low- and high-concentration DTI was tested using the ECT and TIM. RESULTS: All aPTT reagents had a significant dose-dependent correlation with drug concentration. Only Actin FSL and APTT-S demonstrated equivalent aPTT ratios obtained from any DTI. The TAS-aPTT was the most sensitive aPTT reagent to argatroban, with the aPTT ranging from 52.7 to 121.2 seconds corresponding to 0.1 to 1.2 microg/mL of drug concentration. The TAS-aPTT and Pathromtin were the most sensitive aPTT reagents to bivalirudin, with aPTTs of 87.4 seconds and 101.5 seconds, respectively, at 1.2 microg/mL of drug. Pathromtin was the most sensitive aPTT reagent to lepirudin, with a maximum aPTT of 108.9 seconds at 1.2 microg/mL of drug. There was no statistically significant difference between the TIM and ECT clotting times for each DTI. Lepirudin and bivalirudin ECT and TIM clotting times were equivalent. CONCLUSIONS: There are unique differences between reagent manufacturers in the monitoring of DTIs. Acceptable alternatives to aPTT monitoring of DTI anticoagulation include the ECT and TIM.     

Use of lepirudin in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and renal failure requiring hemodialysis

OBJECTIVE: To report two cases of successful lepirudin use in two patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and renal failure. CASE SUMMARY: Two patients with renal failure requiring hemodialysis developed HIT syndrome during intravenous heparin therapy. Anticoagulation was necessary to prevent recurrent, acute venous thrombosis in one patient and to prevent arterial thrombosis associated with the use of an intraaortic balloon pump in the second. Intravenous lepirudin was initiated at doses of 0.01 mg/kg/h and 0.005 mg/kg/h, respectively, and titrated based on the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). Steady-state doses were 0.015 mg/kg/h to maintain aPTT values of approximately 60 seconds in one patient, and 0.005-0.008 mg/kg/h to achieve an aPTT of approximately 45 seconds in the other patient. DISCUSSION: Lepirudin is one of few anticoagulants that can be safely used in patients with HIT. Because it is eliminated through the kidneys, great care must be taken when administering lepirudin to patients with renal failure; in fact, its use is currently not recommended in patients requiring hemodialysis. Lepirudin effectively prevented acute thrombosis in both of our patients with documented HIT, with no bleeding complications. We describe how we selected the initial doses and report results of aPTT monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with renal failure who develop HIT, lepirudin is one available alternative to heparin despite its poor renal elimination pattern and subsequently prolonged half-life.     

The prothrombin time/international normalized ratio (PT/INR) Line: derivation of local INR with commercial thromboplastins and coagulometers – two independent studies

Summary. Background: The WHO scheme for prothrombin time (PT) standardization has been limited in application, because of its difficulties in implementation, particularly the need for mandatory manual PT testing and for local provision of thromboplastin international reference preparations (IRP). Methods: The value of a new simpler procedure to derive international normalized ratio (INR), the PT/INR Line, based on only five European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation (ECAA) calibrant plasmas certified by experienced centres has been assessed in two independent exercises using a range of commercial thromboplastins and coagulometers. INRs were compared with manual certified values with thromboplastin IRP from expert centres and in the second study also with INRs from local ISI calibrations. Results: In the first study with the PT/INR Line, 8.7% deviation from certified INRs was reduced to 1.1% with human reagents, and from 7.0% to 2.6% with rabbit reagents. In the second study, deviation was reduced from 11.2% to 0.4% with human reagents by both local ISI calibration and the PT/INR Line. With rabbit reagents, 10.4% deviation was reduced to 1.1% with both procedures; 4.9% deviation was reduced to 0.5% with bovine/combined reagents with local ISI calibrations and to 2.9% with the PT/INR Line. Mean INR dispersion was reduced with all thromboplastins and automated systems using the PT/INR Line. Conclusions: The procedure using the PT/INR Line provides reliable INR derivation without the need for WHO ISI calibration across the range of locally used commercial thromboplastins and automated PT systems included in two independent international studies.     

Guidelines on preparation, certification, and use of certified plasmas for ISI calibration and INR determination.

Reliable international normalized ratio (INR) determination depends on accurate values for international sensitivity index (ISI) and mean normal prothrombin time (MNPT). Local ISI calibration can be performed to obtain reliable INR. Alternatively, the laboratory may determine INR directly from a line relating local log(prothrombin time [PT]) to log(INR). This can be done by means of lyophilized or frozen plasmas to which certified values of PT or INR have been assigned. Currently there is one procedure for local calibration with certified plasmas which is a modification of the WHO method of ISI determination. In the other procedure, named 'direct' INR determination, certified plasmas are used to calculate a line relating log(PT) to log(INR). The number of certified plasmas for each procedure depends on the method of preparation and type of plasma. Lyophilization of plasma may induce variable effects on the INR, the magnitude of which depends on the type of thromboplastin used. Consequently, the manufacturer or supplier of certified plasmas must assign the values for different (reference) thromboplastins and validate the procedure for reliable ISI calibration or 'direct' INR determination. Certification of plasmas should be performed by at least three laboratories. Multiple values should be assigned if the differences between thromboplastin systems are greater than 10%. Testing of certified plasmas for ISI calibration may be performed in quadruplicate in the same working session. It is recommended to repeat the measurements on three sessions or days to control day-to-day variation. Testing of certified plasmas for 'direct' INR determination should be performed in at least three sessions or days. Correlation lines for ISI calibration and for 'direct' INR determination should be calculated by means of orthogonal regression. Quality assessment of the INR with certified plasmas should be performed regularly and should be repeated whenever there is a change in reagent batch or in instrument. Discrepant results obtained by users of certified plasmas should be reported to manufacturers or suppliers.     

Properties of recombinant human thromboplastin that determine the International Sensitivity Index (ISI)

Prothrombin Time (PT) clotting tests are widely used to monitor oral anticoagulation therapy and to screen for clotting factor deficiencies. The active ingredient in PT reagents (thromboplastins) is tissue factor, the integral membrane protein that triggers the clotting cascade through the extrinsic pathway. Several years ago, a system for calibrating and using thromboplastin reagents, known as the International Sensitivity Index (ISI) and the International Normalized Ratio (INR), was developed to standardize monitoring of oral anticoagulant therapy. The ISI/INR method, while revolutionizing the monitoring of coumarin therapy, has been criticized for a number of perceived shortcomings. We have undertaken a series of studies aimed at achieving a detailed understanding of which parameters influence the ISI values of thromboplastin reagents, with an ultimate goal of creating 'designer thromboplastins' whose sensitivities to the various clotting factors can be individually tailored. In this study, we demonstrate that ISI values of thromboplastin reagents based on relipidated, recombinant human tissue factor can be controlled by a combination of changes in the phospholipid content (in particular, the levels of phosphatidylserine and phosphatidylethanolamine) and ionic strength. The sensitivity of a given thromboplastin reagent can be increased (i.e. its ISI value decreased) by decreasing the content of phosphatidylserine and/or increasing the ionic strength. The molar ratio of phospholipid to tissue factor, on the other hand, had essentially no impact on ISI value.     

Coagulometer international sensitivity index (ISI) derivation,a rapid method using the prothrombin time/international normalized ratio (PT/INR) Line: a multicenter study

Summary. Background: The original WHO procedure for prothrombin time (PT) standardization has been almost entirely abandoned because of the universal use of PT coagulometers. These often give different international normalized ratio (INR) results from the manual method, between individual makes of instruments and with instruments from the same manufacture. Method A simple procedure is required to derive local INR with coagulometers. The PT/INR Line method has recently been developed using five European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation (ECAA) certified plasmas to derive local INR. This procedure has been modified to derive a coagulometer PT/INR Line providing International Sensitivity Index (ISI) and mean normal PT (MNPT) for coagulometers and give local INR. Results have been compared with conventional ISI calibrations at the same laboratories. Results: With human thromboplastins, mean ISI by local calibration was 0.93 (range: 0.77–1.16). With the PT/INR Line, mean coagulometer ISI was higher, for example 0.99 (0.84–1.23) but using the PT/INR Line derived MNPT there was no difference in local INR. Between‐centre INR variation of a certified validation plasma was reduced with human and bovine reagents after correction with local ISI calibrations and the PT/INR Line. Conclusion: The PT/INR Line–ISI with its derived MNPT is shown to provide reliable local INR with the 13 different reagent/coagulometer combinations at the 28 centres in this international study.     

凝血活酶敏感指数对凝血酶原时间测定的影响

本文观察了四种不同国际敏感指数的凝血活酶试剂，在相同条件下，对２５例正常人和５０例口服华法令病人进行了ＰＴ测定，结果显示正常参考值随所用凝血活酶的ＩＳＩ不同而异。建议各实验室应依其所用试剂建立自己实验室的正常参考值。对口服抗凝药的５０例患者测得ＰＴｓ（秒）和ＰＴＲ（比率）经方差分析，四组结果有显著性差异（Ｐ〈０．０１），而按ＩＮＲ＝ＰＴＲ＾ＩＳＩ换算成国际标准化比率（ＩＮＲ）后，经方差分析，四组Ｉ     

Comparison of local International Sensitivity Index calibration and ''Direct INR'' methods in correction of locally reported International Normalized Ratios: an international study

BACKGROUND: It is no longer feasible to check local International Normalized Ratios (INR) by the World Health Organization International Sensitivity Index (ISI) calibrations because the necessary manual prothrombin time technique required has generally been discarded. OBJECTIVES: An international collaborative study at 77 centers has compared local INR correction using the two alternative methods recommended in the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis guidelines: local ISI calibration and 'Direct INR'. METHODS: Success of INR correction by local ISI calibration and with Direct INR was assessed with a set of 27 certified lyophilized plasmas (20 from patients on warfarin and seven from normals). RESULTS: At 49 centers using human thromboplastins, 3.0% initial average local INR deviation from certified INR was reduced by local ISI calibration to 0.7%, and at 25 centers using rabbit reagents, from 15.9% to 7.5%. With a minority of commercial thromboplastins, mainly 'combined' rabbit reagents, INR correction was not achieved by local ISI calibration. However, when rabbit combined reagents were excluded the overall mean INR deviation after correction was reduced further to 3.9%. In contrast, with Direct INR, mean deviation using human thromboplastins increased from 3.0% to 6.6%, but there was some reduction with rabbit reagents from 15.9% to 10% (12.3% with combined reagents excluded). CONCLUSIONS: Local ISI calibration gave INR correction for the majority of PT systems but failed at the small number using combined rabbit reagents suggesting a need for a combined reference thromboplastin. Direct INR correction was disappointing but better than local ISI calibration with combined rabbit reagents. Interlaboratory variability was improved by both procedures with human reagents only.     

凝血酶原时间ISI/INR系统测定中的一些问题及改进意见

目的对凝血酶原时间(PT)测定ISI/INR系统出现的一些问题提出相应的改进建议。方法对上海市12家医院在用的仪器和匹配的PT试剂,对日常使用的正常血浆平均凝血酶原时间(MNPT)作调研实测,将结果进行分析;调查试剂的仪器特定(spec ific)国际敏感度指数(ISI)值与世界卫生组织(WHO)的手工法ISI定标值之间的差异;用2种已知国际标准化比值(INR)的异常参比血浆代替WHO的ISI系统作质控并行比较。结果12家中有4家日常使用的平均正常凝血酶原时间(MNPT)明显偏离实测值,分别为0.8、0.9、1.0和1.8 s。用WHO CRM149R参比,用手工法标定的凝血活酶和109 mmol枸橼酸钠抗凝的不同PT值血标本,在Sysm ex1500型、C.2000型仪器上测定试剂的仪器特定ISI,其结果比手工法分别减少4.1%和4.7%,但采用HEPES-枸橼酸钠抗凝剂标本时,2种型号仪器的特定ISI比手工法分别减少16.7%及7.7%。用已知INR异常参比血浆,国产品与进口品对照的结果良好。结论受调研12家中,有4家血凝分析仪器调研时实测的MNPT明显偏离日常使用值。有几家医院试剂的仪器特定ISI值也存在问题,建议纠正。用已知INR异常参比血浆代替WHO手工法标定凝血活酶ISI法作质控,使用简便,又不需MNPT参数,值得推广。     

仪器对凝血酶原时间国际标准化比值的影响及校正

为了评价血凝仪对国际标准化比值的影响。模拟ＷＨＯ标定凝血质的参比方法，用一种已 知国际敏感指标的凝血质对两种血凝仪的特异性ＩＳＩ进行标定，并以ＩＮＲ形式报告ＰＴ结果。     

A Comparison of Coagulation Function in Patients Receiving Aspirin and Cefoperazone-Sulbactam With and Without Vitamin K1: A Retrospective,Observational Study

PurposeThe study objective was to explore whether prophylaxis with vitamin K₁ improves abnormal coagulation function–associated cefoperazone-sulbactam in patients treated in the long term with low-dose aspirin.MethodsThis retrospective, observational study assessed patients treated with long-term low-dose aspirin in a naval military hospital in China from 2004 to 2018, including all patients treated concurrently with cefoperazone-sulbactam with or without vitamin K₁. Differences in the coagulation index were analyzed statistically before and after receipt of cefoperazone-sulbactam.FindingsThe cohort included 227 patients. After cefoperazone-sulbactam treatment, the mean (SD) prothrombin time (PT) was 14.07 (3.07) seconds, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) was 35.15 (4.78) seconds, and international normalized ratio (INR) was 1.49 (0.49) in the cefoperazone-sulbactam group, which was significantly higher than the PT of 11.55 (1.29), aPTT of 31.37 (2.20), and INR of 1.12 (0.35) before cefoperazone-sulbactam treatment. No significant difference was in the cefoperazone-sulbactam plus vitamin K₁ group. In addition, no significant difference was found in the thrombin time or fibrinogen level between before and after cefoperazone-sulbactam treatment in both groups. The mean (SD) platelet counts of the 2 groups were 197.34 (71.82) × 10⁹/L and 187.75 (72.66) × 1 0⁹/L after cefoperazone-sulbactam treatment, respectively, which was significantly lower than 231.77 (77.05) × 10⁹/L and 232.08 (84.48) × 10⁹/L before cefoperazone-sulbactam treatment. There were greater proportions of coagulation disorders (prolongation of PT, aPTT, INR, and bleeding) after cefoperazone-sulbactam treatment in the cefoperazone-sulbactam group compared with that in the cefoperazone-sulbactam plus vitamin K₁ group.ImplicationsResults indicate that, after adding cefoperazone-sulbactam to the regimens of patients receiving long-term low-dose aspirin, therapy contributed to remarkable increase in abnormal coagulation function and coagulation disorders. Prophylaxis with vitamin K₁ decreased the risk of these abnormalities in blood coagulation parameters associated with cefoperazone-sulbactam in patients taking long-term aspirin.     

International normalized ratio in the prothrombin test: clinical significance and use

The safety and efficiency of therapy by peroral anticoagulants (PA) depend on a laboratory monitoring based on the prothrombin test (PT). The test is distinguished through its variability conditioned by different means of results' presentation as well as through the sensitivity of thromboplastin and a type of a device used in coagulation detection. WHO recommended, 1983, to standardize the thromboplastin preparations through adjusting their sensitivity (the so-called International Sensitivity Index--ISI) to blood coagulation defects induced by PA versus the primary international reference thromboplastin. Thromboplastin ISI as well as the mean normal prothrombin time (MNPT) of blood plasma are used to calculate the international normalized ratio (INR). The presentation of PT results as INR is justified exclusively for the PA-therapy stabilized patients. The INR system makes it possible to optimize the PA therapy only if the laboratory expert and clinician can clearly understand the PT standardization essence and observe the key WHO recommendations, i.e. definition of a coagulometer-specific ISI by manufacturing companies, estimation of MNPT by laboratories and use of the correct anticoagulant concentration.     

乙型病毒性肝炎患者中末期凝血酶原时间标准化报告方式

目的 探讨乙型病毒性肝炎患者凝血酶原时间(PT)的标准化报告方式。方法 选择乙型病毒性肝炎患者61例,其中肝炎后肝硬化41例,慢性重型肝炎20例。20例口服华法令抗凝药患者作为对照组。采用来源不同、ISI值不同的6种凝血活酶试剂进行PT测定,以秒数、比率、活动度百分率以及国际正常化比率4种方式表示PT结果。结果 病毒性肝炎患者PT结果,当以活动度百分率和比率形式表示时,不同凝血活酶试剂之间差异没有显著性意义(F=1.289,P=0.268;F=I.992,,J=3.079),当以秒数和INR报告方式表示时,差异有显著意义(F=8.491,P=0.0001;F=2.497.P=0.031)。通过Neoplastin与其他5种试剂的PT结果作线性回归分析,当结果以活动度百分率表示时,Neoplastin与其他5种试剂之间存在高度一致性;而以秒数,比率和INR表示时,试剂之间不存在一致性。提示PT活动度百分率能使乙型病毒性肝炎中末期患者PT报告方式标准化。口服抗凝剂治疗的患者仅INR能使PT的报告方式标准化。结论 PT活动度百分率能使乙型病毒性肝炎中末期患者PT报告方式标准化,INR仅适用于抗凝治疗患者PT结果的报告。     

Clinical utilization of the international normalized ratio (INR)

The prothrombin time (PT) is one of the most important laboratory tests to determine the functionality of the blood coagulation system. It is used in patient care to diagnose diseases of coagulation, assess the risk of bleeding in patients undergoing operative procedures, monitor patients being treated with oral anticoagulant (coumadin) therapy, and evaluate liver function. The PT is performed by measuring the clotting time of platelet-poor plasma after the addition of calcium and thromboplastin, a combination of tissue factor and phospholipid. Intra- and interlaboratory variation in the PT was a significant problem for clinical laboratories in the past, when crude extracts of rabbit brain or human placenta were the only source of thromboplastin. The international normalized ratio (INR), developed by the World Health Organization in the early 1980s, is designed to eliminate problems in oral anticoagulant therapy caused by variability in the sensitivity of different commercial sources and different lots of thromboplastin to blood coagulation factor VII. The INR is used worldwide by most laboratories performing oral anticoagulation monitoring, and is routinely incorporated into dosage planning for patients receiving warfarin. Although the recent availability of sensitive PT reagents prepared from recombinant human tissue factor (rHTF) and synthetic phospholipids eliminated many of the earlier problems associated with the use of crude thromboplastin preparations, local instrument variability in the INR still remains a problem. Presently, the use of plasma calibrants seems the best solution to this problem. Standardizing the point-of-care instruments for INR monitoring is another dilemma faced by the industry. Ultimately, new generations of anticoagulant drugs may eliminate the need for laboratory monitoring of anticoagulant therapy.     

血浆凝血酶原时间测定中建立仪器区域国际敏感指数的实验探讨

目的　探讨临床口服抗凝治疗时血浆凝血酶原时间 (PT)监测的标准化 ,为临床提供比较准确的PT 国际标准化比值 (PT INR)结果。方法　使用PT INR校准血浆建立PT测定试剂在不同仪器上的区域性国际敏感度指数 (LocalISI) ,以此对新鲜血浆进行PT测定。结果　未经LocalISI校准的PT试剂测定血浆的PT时 ,INR结果差异较大 (P <0 .0 1)。试剂经LocalISI校准后 ,测定血浆PT时 ,INR结果良好 (P >0 .0 5及Kap pa >0 .75 )。 结论　在PT测定时 ,只要建立仪器和测定试剂的LocalISI ,INR结果就具有较好的一致性。     

肝衰竭患者凝血酶原时间报告形式的探讨

目的 :探讨在肝衰竭病人的凝血酶原时间 (PT)以秒数、比率、活动百分率计 ,还是以国际正常化比率(INR)表示。方法 :采用 ISI 1.11,1.76和 2 .0 5的三种凝血活酶对 5 2例肝衰竭病人和 5 0例口服华法令的换瓣术后的病人进行 PT测定。以上述四种方式表示结果。结果 :肝衰竭病人 ,PT百分率能消除变异的可能性 (P<0 .0 5 ) ,而其他表示形式仍有明显的差异 (P>0 .0 1)。患者口服抗凝治疗后仅 INR能较准确地反映 PT的结果。结论 :INR不能用于表达非抗凝治疗患者的 PT结果。 PT活动的百分率是为肝衰竭病人的最好报告形式。     

Effects of therapeutic plasma exchange on anticoagulants in patients receiving therapeutic anticoagulation: a systematic review

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) removes coagulation proteins, but its impact on therapeutic anticoagulation is unknown. We performed a systematic review of the literature to determine the coagulation effects of TPE in patients receiving systemic anticoagulation. We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Web of Science until June 2018 for studies combining controlled vocabulary and keywords related to therapeutic plasma exchange, plasmapheresis, anticoagulants, and therapy. The primary outcome was the effect of TPE on anti‐Xa activity, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), or international normalized ratio (INR). The secondary outcome was reports of post‐TPE bleeding or thrombosis. A total of 1830 references were screened and eight studies identified. Our selected studies (five case reports and three case series) involved 23 patients and evaluated the effects of seven anticoagulants. Six studies of unfractionated heparin, low‐molecular‐weight heparins, and direct oral anticoagulants demonstrated an anti‐Xa level decline. Two studies of unfractionated heparin and low‐molecular‐weight heparins showed an aPTT increase. One study of warfarin showed a post‐TPE INR increase. Reports of post‐TPE bleeding occurred in two patients and thrombosis in one. In patients receiving therapeutic anticoagulation, TPE is associated with anti‐Xa activity decline and aPTT and INR increase. These coagulation changes do not appear to significantly increase bleeding or thrombotic risk. Our data suggest the need for prospective studies to investigate the true clinical impact of TPE on therapeutic anticoagulation.