Clinical positioning of indapamide sustained release 1.5mg in management protocols for hypertension

Indapamide sustained release (SR) 1.5mg is a new galenic formulation that is characterised by a relatively constant plasma concentration at steady state, with only minor fluctuations during the 24-hour period. A dose-titration study of 3 doses of indapamide SR (1.5, 2 and 2.5mg) given once daily has shown that the 3 dosages are equipotent in lowering blood pressure, and have an effect similar to that of indapamide immediate-release (IR) 2.5mg; all were statistically more effective than placebo. The percentage of hypertensive patients whose serum potassium was less than 3.4 mmol/L was significantly lower after indapamide SR 1.5mg than after indapamide IR 2.5mg. Neither indapamide formulation had any significant effects on lipid profile, glucose, urea and serum creatinine; only uric acid was slightly raised during the 2-month study. In an equivalence study, indapamide SR 1.5mg and IR 2.5mg produced similar blood pressure reductions (within the equivalence limit of +/-5mm Hg), whereas the percentage of patients whose serum potassium fell to less than 3.4 mmol/L was lower in the IR 1.5mg group than in the SR 2.5mg group. Antihypertensive treatment with indapamide SR 1.5mg once daily produced reductions in blood pressure in elderly patients with systolic/diastolic or isolated systolic hypertension that were similar to reductions with amlodipine 5 mg/day. The incidence of adverse effects was very low in all studies with indapamide SR 1.5mg and very similar to that in the placebo group, confirming thereby the improvement in the efficacy: tolerance ratio with the new indapamide compound.     

Reversal of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy

Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is an important intermediate target for antihypertensive therapy. Thus, several trials and meta-analyses have attempted to compare the effects of different antihypertensive agents on LVH, but flawed study designs and methodologic problems have limited the utility of these studies. PRESERVE (Prospective Randomized Enalapril Study Evaluating Regression of Ventricular Enlargement), LIVE (LVH: Indapamide Sustained Release Versus Enalapril) and LIFE (Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension) represent a new generation of large well designed trials with the power to compare different antihypertensive drugs. These studies have shown that treatment regimens based on enalapril and a nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system are of similar efficacy (PRESERVE), that indapamide sustained release (SR) is superior to enalapril (LIVE), and that a regimen based on losartan is superior to a regimen based on atenolol (LIFE) in reversing hypertensive LVH. LIVE incorporated on-treatment echocardiographic quality control, with centralized readers blinded for both treatment and sequence of recording. The findings of these rigorous studies, to some extent in disagreement with results of previous meta-analyses, support the notion that antihypertensive drugs need to be judged on their individual effects on important intermediate endpoints such as LVH in well designed and adequately sized studies. However, extrapolation of the results of these studies in terms of class effects could be misleading and should be made with caution.     

A Meta-Analytical Approach to the Efficacy of Antihypertensive Drugs in Reducing Blood Pressure

INTRODUCTION: Hypertension constitutes a veritable public health issue. Several classes of drugs are available for the treatment of hypertension. The objective of this meta-analytical approach was to assess the efficacy of antihypertensive drugs most commonly used in France in reducing clinical SBP and DBP. METHODS: The antihypertensive drugs selected were hydrochlorothiazide, indapamide sustained release (SR), furosemide and spironolactone for diuretics; amlodipine and lercanidipine for calcium channel antagonists; atenolol for beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (beta-blockers); enalapril and ramipril for ACE inhibitors; and candesartan cilexetil, irbesartan, losartan, and valsartan for angiotensin II receptor antagonists. The trials selected were published between 1973 and 2004, evaluated monotherapy with trial drugs as fixed-dosage or with dosage increase, and assessed blood pressure reduction between 2 and 3 months. The analysis method used was based on the calculation of the sum weighted for the trial size. RESULTS: A total of 72 trials (comprising 9094 patients) were selected and analyzed. No trial evaluating furosemide or spironolactone satisfied the inclusion criteria for this analysis. For SBP, the reduction was more marked with diuretics, calcium channel antagonists, and ACE inhibitors. Of all the drugs studied, indapamide SR gave the greatest SBP reduction (-22.2 mm Hg). Evaluated therapeutic classes had a similar magnitude of effect on DBP, i.e. reduction between -11.4 mm Hg with beta-adrenoceptor antagonists and -10.3 mm Hg with angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists. CONCLUSION: Indapamide SR 1.5 mg appeared to be the most effective drug for a significant reduction in SBP within 2-3 months, which is an essential element in optimizing cardiovascular prevention among hypertensive patients. The clinical application of these results should take into consideration all the limitations discussed in this analysis.     

Indapamide: Clinical Pharmacology,Therapeutic Efficacy in Hypertension,and Adverse Effects

Indapamide will soon be marketed in the United States as an oral antihypertensive agent and diuretic. Its molecular structure includes both a polar sulfamoyl chlorobenzamide moiety and a lipid-soluble methylindoline molety. It differs chemically from the thiazides in that it does not possess the thiazide ring system and it contains only one sulfonamide group. Indapamide is rapidly and well absorbed after oral Ingestion, and it has a long terminal half-life in whole blood which permits once daily administration. Indapamide is extensively metabolized by the liver with excretion of unchanged drug accounting for approximately 5% of the total dose. Although indapamide is thought to exert its antihypertensive effect by its diuretic action, several investigations employing laboratory animal preparations have documented a direct vascular action. It has been categorized as a calcium channel blocking agent and this may account for a portion of its antihypertensive effectiveness. In both the treatment of edema and as an antihypertensive agent, indapamide appears to be comparable to hydrochlorothiazide, chlorthalidone and furosemide and seems to have no clinically important advantage over these agents. Side effects associated with indapamide are minimal and appear to be comparable to those observed with other antihypertensive diuretics. Based on few published studies, indapamide appears to be a useful long acting antihypertensive and diuretic agent that is well tolerated and associated with minimal biochemical abnormalities or side effects.     

Antihypertensive action of indapamide. Comparative studies in several experimental models.

1-(4-Chloro-3-sulfamylbenzamido)-2-methyl-indoline (indapamide), after single oral dose administration, showed antihypertensive activity in genetically hypertensive rats, DOCA/saline hypertensive rats, unilaterally-nephrectomised DOCA/saline hypertensive rats and dogs made hypertensive by renal encapsulation. The activity was observed at doses as low as 1-3 mg/kg and lasted at least 48 h. Increasing the dose level considerably prolonged the duration of action but did not substantially enhance the maximum antihypertensive effect. In genetically hypertensive rats indapamide was 30-300 times more potent than furosemide, spironolactone and chlorthalidone. Indapamide had no effect on blood pressure in normotensive rats. In concentrations of 1 X 10(-5) to 1 X 10(-3) g/ml, indapamide antagonised contractions of arterial and venous strips to angiotensin, epinephrine and norepinephrine revealing a direct vascular action. Indapamide has a prolonged saluretic action which in combination with the direct vascular effects may well account for its antihypertensive activity.     

Metabolic profile of indapamide sustained-release in patients with hypertension: data from three randomised double-blind studies.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of indapamide sustained-release (SR) 1.5 mg/day, a thiazide-related sulfonamide diuretic, on serum levels of lipids (total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and triglycerides), glucose and uric acid, and renal function (serum urea and creatinine levels). METHODS: Pooled data from three randomised, double-blind, controlled studies are analysed. Two of these studies were of short duration (2 and 3 months), one of which included a 9-month nonblind extension phase, and the third was a 12-month prospective study. Short- and long-term metabolic effects of the treatment could thus be analysed. All studies were conducted in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension; the total population randomised in these studies comprised 1195 patients, of whom 505 had left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). RESULTS: After 2 to 3 months' treatment with indapamide SR 1.5 mg/day, there was no significant change from baseline in serum lipid levels and glucose levels. This neutral effect was maintained after 9 and 12 months of treatment. Renal function was not affected by short- or long-term indapamide SR 1.5 mg/day therapy. Serum uric acid level was slightly increased after short-term therapy, but was restored to baseline values during long-term therapy with indapamide SR 1.5 mg/day. CONCLUSIONS: Indapamide SR 1.5 mg/day has no deleterious effect on glucose metabolism, serum levels of lipids and uric acid, or renal function. This antihypertensive agent can be considered to be an attractive therapeutic choice for all patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension, including the elderly and patients with increased cardiovascular risks, i.e. those with LVH.     

Effect of indapamide on the proliferation of Balb/C 3T3 cells induced by platelet-derived growth factor.

The effects of indapamide (a nonthiazide antihypertensive diuretic) on the growth promoting activity of serum, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), fibroblast growth factor (FGF) or Ca3(PO4)2 on Balb/C 3T3 cells were studied. Indapamide inhibited the growth promoting activity of serum, but furosemide (a nonthiazide antihypertensive diuretic) had no such inhibitory effect. Indapamide inhibited the growth promoting activity of PDGF, but not that of FGF and Ca3(PO4)2. The present experiments demonstrate that indapamide selectively inhibits the growth promoting activity of PDGF.     

Antihypertensive efficacy of indapamide SR in hypertensive patients uncontrolled with a background therapy: the NATIVE study*

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Antihypertensive monotherapy rarely achieves blood pressure (BP) control. NATIVE (NATrilix SR use in combInation antihypertensiVe thErapy) evaluated indapamide sustained release (SR) in hypertensive patients receiving background therapy.

Research design and methods: Patients remaining hypertensive (systolic BP [SBP], 145–180?mmHg; diastolic BP [DBP], 95–105?mmHg) while receiving an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (n = 709), β-blocker (n = 629), calcium-channel blocker (CCB; n = 493), angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB; n = 75), α-blocker (n = 29) or other therapy (n = 6) were enrolled, recruited by physicians from 228 centres in Pakistan. Indapamide SR 1.5?mg was administered daily for 3 months with background therapy. BP was assessed every 2 weeks, and blood glucose and total cholesterol were evaluated at baseline and study end in a patient subgroup. Adverse events were also recorded.

Main outcome measures and results: Of 2073 enrolled patients (49% males; mean age 51 years), 1941 received indapamide SR and background therapy. SBP and DBP decreased significantly (SBP, 166 ± 16?mmHg at baseline vs. 132 ± 12?mmHg at 3 months; DBP, 102 ± 8?mmHg vs. 83 ± 6?mmHg; both p < 0.0001 vs. baseline). Patients uncontrolled with an ACE inhibitor, β-blocker, CCB or ARB achieved an SBP/DBP decrease of 34 ± 15/19 ± 9, 33 ± 17/19 ± 10, 33 ± 15/18 ± 8 or 35 ± 16/20 ± 12?mmHg, respectively (all p < 0.0001). In all, 84% of patients achieved target SBP (≤?140?mmHg) and 61% achieved BP normalisation (SBP <?140, DBP <?90?mmHg). The absence of placebo control may lead to an overestimation of the extent of the BP reduction achieved. Glucose and cholesterol levels were unaffected by indapamide SR. Four percent of patients experienced side-effects, which were mild-to-moderate in severity.

Conclusions: In patients with hypertension despite antihypertensive therapy, indapamide SR significantly reduced BP with a good acceptability profile. Indapamide SR may represent an effective additional therapy for patients who do not achieve BP goals with other antihypertensive agents.     

Treating hypertension by rational use of diuretics: results of the Russian ARGUS-2 study

ABSTRACT

Objective: Insufficient use of diuretics in combination antihypertensive therapy is a main cause of poor blood pressure (BP) control in Russia. The objective of the ARGUS-2 study was to demonstrate that a rational use of a thiazide-like diuretic, indapamide sustained release (SR), alone or in combination, improves BP control in patients with arterial hypertension difficult to control due to isolated systolic hypertension (ISH), diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic nephropathy, or metabolic syndrome.

Methods: The open-label, non-comparative, 3-month study without preliminary washout included 1438 hypertensive patients (mean age: 57.3?±?10.7 years, mean BP: 158.8?±?14.2/93.4?±?10.0?mmHg), with difficult-to-control arterial hypertension and who had never been treated with diuretics previously. Throughout the study, patients received indapamide SR 1.5?mg OD. BP control was defined as <140/90?mmHg for all patients and <130/80?mmHg for those with diabetes mellitus or chronic nephropathy.

Results: Indapamide SR was given as initiation monotherapy to 13.7% of the patients, as substitutive monotherapy to 6.8% of the patients uncontrolled by a previous monotherapy, as additive therapy to 31.9% of the patients uncontrolled by previous monotherapy, and as additive therapy to 47.6% uncontrolled by previous combination therapy without a diuretic. Among included patients 75.7% received also an ACE inhibitor or an angiotensin II receptors blocker, 43.9% a calcium channel blocker, and 32.8% a beta-blocker. In 3 months after indapamide SR administration, average BP level decreased to 131.8?±?9.7/80.5?±?6.9?mmHg and 84.5% of the study population achieved BP control. BP was controlled in 91.9% of patients with ISH (n?=?477), 74.8% of those with diabetes (n?=?214), 75.6% of those with chronic nephropathy (n?=?82), and 85.1% of patients with metabolic syndrome (n?=?745). No case of hypokalemia was reported.

Conclusion: The study demonstrates the value of including the thiazide-like diuretic indapamide SR in a combined antihypertensive regimen to control BP in hypertensive patients with added cardiovascular risk factors whose hypertension is difficult to treat. Methodological limitations of this study are its open-label design and the possibility of a change in concomitant antihypertensive treatment during the study.     

时辰化服用国家基本药物(依那普利,吲达帕胺)治疗高血压病临床观察

目的:探讨时辰化服用国家基本药物(依那普利、吲达帕胺)治疗Ⅱ型高血压病的疗效.方法:试验组(时辰化服药组)和对照组(常规化服药组)各随机选取Ⅱ型高血压患者200例,试验组根据血压节律类型及依那普利和吲达帕胺的药代动力学特点选择不同的给药时间点;对照组每天上午8:00服用吲达帕胺2.5mg,1次/日,依那普利10mg,1次/日.结果:试验组白昼平均收缩压/舒张压(dMSBP/dMDBP)、夜间平均收缩压/舒张压(nMSBP/nMDBP)、24小时平均收缩压/舒张压(24hMSBP/24hMDBP)、平均动脉压(MAP)、血压晨峰(MBPS)等相关临床指标均有显著下降,试验组比对照组下降明显(P<0.01),服药治疗1年后试验组24h血压变异小,降压峰谷比值(T/P)高,对照组24h血压变异大,降压峰谷比值(T/P)低.结论:吲达帕胺及依那普利按时辰化服用可平稳、有效控制24h血压,降低昼夜整体血压水平,有效抑制清晨时段血压的快速上升,能最大限度降低血压波动.     

Evaluation of long-term efficacy and acceptability of indapamide SR in elderly hypertensive patients

OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term antihypertensive efficacy and acceptability of indapamide SR 1.5 mg in elderly hypertensive patients (> or = 65 years). STUDY DESIGN: Open, 12-month, follow-up study of 444 patients, treated with indapamide SR, who were responders and/or achieved target BP levels following a 3-month, randomised, controlled, double-blind short-term comparison of indapamide SR versus hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg and amlodipine 5 mg. RESULTS: The long-term decrease in systolic blood pressure (SBP)/diastolic blood pressure (DBP) after 12 months follow-up with indapamide SR was -24.0/-13.1 mmHg from baseline (M0). The percentage of patients that achieved target BP levels (DBP < 95 mmHg, SBP < or = 160 mmHg) was 80.1% [84.3% for isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) subgroup], and the response rate (BP < 140/90 mmHg or decrease in supine diastolic BP > or = 10 mmHg or in supine systolic BP > or = 20 mmHg) 81.5%. Blood pressure (BP) remained stable throughout the 12 months follow-up period (M3-M15), whatever the previous treatment received during the 3-month, doubleblind period (M0-M3). Clinical and biological acceptability was good. A low occurrence of withdrawals (7.2%), was reported. CONCLUSION: Over the course of the long-term, 12-month follow-up study, indapamide SR was shown to be an effective and well tolerated antihypertensive therapy, even after a switch from amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide, in patients aged 65 years-80 years with systolo-diastolic hypertension (SDH) or ISH.     

吲达帕胺联合依那普利治疗糖尿病合并高血压的可行性研究

目的：分析吲达帕胺联合依那普利治疗糖尿病合并高血压的临床效果及可行性;方法：随机将我院收治的70例患者分为对照组和观察组,对照组主要采用依那普利治疗,观察组在对照组治疗的基础上加用吲达帕胺治疗,观察两组患者血糖、血钾、血压水平,以及治疗效果;结果：血钾、血糖方面,两组患者治疗前后检测比较,P＞0.05;治疗后,观察组血糖低于对照组,两组比较,P＜0.05;血压方面,两组患者的舒张压和收缩压均有所下降,观察组下降效果优于对照组,两组比较,P＜0.05;观察组血压控制的总有效率为85.71%,对照组为65.71%,两组比较差异显著具有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论：对糖尿病合并高血压患者行吲达帕胺联合依那普利治疗效果显著,不良反应少,安全性和可行性较高。     

Position of indapamide, a diuretic with vasorelaxant activities, in antihypertensive therapy

INTRODUCTION: Diuretics play a pivotal role in the management of hypertension. A large experience has been accumulated with indapamide , a long-acting thiazide-like diuretic that lowers blood pressure (BP) primarily through its natriuretic diuretic effect. Some of its long-term antihypertensive efficacy may be due to calcium antagonist-like vasorelaxant activities. Indapamide has protecting effects in a variety of conditions associated with high cardiovascular risk, such as diabetes, left ventricular hypertrophy, nephropathy and stroke. It is highly effective in lowering BP, whether given alone or in combination. Indapamide is well tolerated and has the advantage of having no adverse impact on glucose and lipid metabolism. Today, thiazide-like diuretics are regarded more and more as preferred drugs, when diuretic therapy is required to lower BP. AREAS COVERED: The aim of this paper is to review the experience accumulated with indapamide. It is limited to clinical studies that are relevant for the everyday management of hypertensive patients, whether or not they exhibit cardiovascular or renal disease. EXPERT OPINION: Indapamide, because of its well-documented beneficial effects on cardiovascular and renal outcomes, represents a safe and valuable option for treating patients with high BP. There is, however, still room for new trials evaluating the combination of this diuretic with other types of antihypertensive drugs, in particular a calcium antagonist such as amlodipine. There is also the need to compare the indapamide-perindopril and indapamide-amlodipine combinations, in terms of antihypertensive efficacy, tolerability and effects on target organ damage and, ideally, on cardiovascular mortality.     

Indapamide. A review of its pharmacodynamic properties and therapeutic efficacy in hypertension

Indapamide is an orally active sulphonamide diuretic agent. Although some evidence appears to indicate that the antihypertensive action of indapamide is primarily a result of its diuretic activity, only a limited diuresis occurs with the usual antihypertensive doses of 2.5 mg daily, and in vitro and in vivo data suggest that it may also reduce blood pressure by decreasing vascular reactivity and peripheral vascular resistance. In mild to moderate hypertension it is as effective as thiazide diuretics and beta-adrenergic blocking agents in lowering blood pressure when used as the sole treatment. Indapamide has been successfully combined with beta-adrenergic blocking agents, methyldopa, and other anti-hypertensive agents. While such findings need confirmation, it appears that indapamide shares the potential with other diuretic agents to induce electrolyte and other metabolic abnormalities, although it may do so with less frequency or severity. Thus, indapamide appears to offer a suitable alternative to more established drugs as a 'first-line' treatment in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Whether it differs significantly from other diuretics when used as antihypertensive therapy, either in its mode of action or its side effect profile, needs further clarification.     

吲达帕胺缓释片的研制及释药机理考察

目的：研制吲达帕胺缓释片，并考察其释药机理。方法：以HPMC为骨架材料，以微晶纤维素、乳糖和可压性淀粉调节释放度，对吲达帕胺缓释片的影响因素进行了考察，并采用正交试验设计筛选处方。结果：吲达帕胺缓释片的组成为：HPMC K4M 37．5mg，HPMC K15M7．5mg，乳糖45．0mg，可压性淀粉37．5mg，微晶纤维素21．0mg，硬脂酸镁1．5mg，药物的释放符合零级动力学方程，释放机制为骨架溶蚀机制；释药速率受介质pH值的影响，几乎不受压片压力的影响。结论：研制的吲达帕胺缓释片体外释放符合国外同类产品的释药特性。     

吲达帕胺联合依那普利片治疗原发性高血压的临床效果分析

目的 探讨吲达帕胺联合依那普利片治疗原发性高血压的临床效果.方法 选择本院2012年9月～2013年9月收治的95例原发性高血压患者,随机分为治疗组（n=48）和对照组（n=47）,其中,对照组患者采用吲达帕胺进行治疗,治疗组患者采用吲达帕胺联合依那普利片进行治疗,对比两组患者的治疗效果.结果 观察组患者的治疗显效率和总有效率明显高于对照组（P＜0.05）;观察组患者接受治疗前后舒张压的改善效果明显优于对照组（P＜0.05）.结论 吲达帕胺联合依那普利片治疗原发性高血压具有较好的疗效,且该种治疗方法较为简便、不良反应较少、患者依从性较好.     

Modification of the antihypertensive effect of indapamide by indomethacin

Oral treatment with indapamide was found to reduce blood pressure of hypertensive rats but not of normotensive rats. Chronic indomethacin treatment had no effect on blood pressure of untreated normotensive and hypertensive rats. Also indomethacin did not modify the antihypertensive effect of indapamide excluding the direct involvement of PGs in the antihypertensive effect of indapamide. Vascular reactivity to pressor agents NA, ADR and ANG was significantly increased after indomethacin treatment. This may be due to the blockade of the actions of PG in modifying vascular reactivity to vasoconstrictor agents or may be a direct effect of indomethacin on calcium fluxes. Indapamide reduced the reactivity to NA and ANG in the presence of indomethacin suggesting that the antihypertensive effect of indapamide may be through a decrease in reactivity to pressor agents which is independent of increase in the synthesis of vasodilator PGs.     

Acute effect of indapamide on urine calcium excretion in nephrolithiasis and human essential hypertension

The effects of indapamide (2.5 mg once a day) on urinary composition are reported in 20 patients (10 with recurrent calcium nephrolithiasis and 10 with essential hypertension) compared with 20 controls. Indapamide was well absorbed in every patient (mean plasma level at the steady state was 111 +/- 41 ng/ml) and its antihypertensive action was more pronounced in hypertensive than in normotensive patients. It lowered calcium excretion in 18/20 patients (mean fall on the 7th day of treatment: 53%) and raised the Mg/Ca ratio in 20/20 patients (mean increase on the 7th day: 167%). The effect on Ca2+ and Mg2+ excretion was not associated with a strong diuretic effect. During intravenous calcium loading (0.375 mmol/kg body weight) 6 normal subjects after a single oral dose of indapamide excreted less calcium, suggesting a direct renal hypocalciuric action by the drug. Indapamide could represent an alternative drug to thiazide diuretics in diseases with dangerous renal calcium losses, but long-term studies are needed.     

Identification and pharmacological properties of binding sites for the atypical thiazide diuretic, indapamide

[3H]Indapamide bound to a single class of binding sites in pig renal cortex membranes with a dissociation constant Kd = 35 +/- 13 nM and a binding site density Bmax = 40 +/- 9 pmol/mg of protein. [3H]Indapamide binding was inhibited by the carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, acetazolamide, and by thiazide diuretics with the following rank order of potency: chlorothiazide greater than hydrochlorothiazide approximately metolazone greater than hydroflumethiazide. The effect of the latter drugs to inhibit [3H]indapamide binding was not related to their activity as thiazide diuretics, but was significantly correlated with their inhibitory effect on carbonic anhydrase II. These results suggest that the major renal binding site of [3H]indapamide is a membrane form of carbonic anhydrase. Inhibition of carbonic anhydrase may play a role in the antihypertensive effect of indapamide.