Characterization and use of EBT radiochromic film for IMRT dose verification

We present an evaluation of a new and improved radiochromic film, type EBT, for its implementation to IMRT dose verification. Using a characterized flat bed color CCD scanner, the film's dose sensitivity, uniformity, and speed of development post exposure were shown to be superior to previous types of radiochromic films. The film's dose response was found to be very similar to ion chamber scans in water through comparisons of depth dose and lateral dose profiles. The effect of EBT film polarization with delivered dose and film scan orientation was shown to have a significant effect on the scanner's OD readout. In addition, the film's large size, flexibility, and the ability to submerge it in water for relatively short periods of time allowed for its use in both water and solid water phantoms to verify TomoTherapy IMRT dose distributions in flat and curved dose planes. Dose verification in 2D was performed on ten IMRT plans (five head and neck and five prostate) by comparing measured EBT dose distributions to TomoTherapy treatment planning system calculated dose. The quality of agreement was quantified by the gamma index for four sets of dose difference and distance to agreement criteria. Based on this study, we show that EBT film has several favorable features that allow for its use in routine IMRT patient-specific QA.     

Important considerations for radiochromic film dosimetry with flatbed CCD scanners and EBT GAFCHROMIC film

In this study, we present three significant artifacts that have the potential to negatively impact the accuracy and precision of film dosimetry measurements made using GAFCHROMIC EBT radiochromic film when read out with CCD flatbed scanners. Films were scanned using three commonly employed instruments: a Macbeth TD932 spot densitometer, an Epson Expression 1680 CCD array scanner, and a Microtek ScanMaker i900 CCD array scanner. For the two scanners we assessed the variation in optical density (OD) of GAFCHROMIC EBT film with scanning bed position, angular rotation of the film with respect to the scan line direction, and temperature inside the scanner due to repeated scanning. Scanning uniform radiochromic films demonstrated a distinct bowing effect in profiles in the direction of the CCD array with a nonuniformity of up to 17%. Profiles along a direction orthogonal to the CCD array demonstrated a 7% variation. A strong angular dependence was found in measurements made with the flatbed scanners; the effect could not be reproduced with the spot densitometer. An IMRT quality assurance film was scanned twice rotating the film 90' between the scans. For films scanned on the Epson scanner, up to 12% variation was observed in unirradiated EBT films rotated between 0 degrees and 90 degrees, which decreased to approximately 8% for EBT films irradiated to 300 cGy. Variations of up to 80% were observed for films scanned with the Microtek scanner. The scanners were found to significantly increase the film temperature with repeated scanning. Film temperature between 18 and 33 degrees C caused OD changes of approximately 7%. Considering these effects, we recommend adherence to a strict scanning protocol that includes: maintaining the orientation of films scanned on flatbed scanners, limiting scanning to the central portion of the scanner bed, and limiting the number of consecutive scans to minimize changes in OD caused by film heating.     

An investigation of the accuracy of an IMRT dose distribution using two- and three-dimensional dosimetry techniques

Complex dose delivery techniques like intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) require dose measurement in three dimensions for comprehensive validation. Previously, we demonstrated the feasibility of the "PRESAGE/optical-computed tomography (CT)" system for the three-dimensional verification of simple open beam dose distributions where the planning system was known to be accurate. The present work extends this effort and presents the first application of the PRESAGE/optical-CT system for the verification of a complex IMRT distribution. A highly modulated 11 field IMRT plan was delivered to a cylindrical PRESAGE dosimeter (16 cm in diameter and 11 cm in height), and the dose distribution was readout using a commercial scanning-laser optical-CT scanner. Comparisons were made with independent GAFCHROMIC EBT film measurements, and the calculated dose distribution from a commissioned treatment planning system (ECLIPSE). Isodose plots, dose profiles, gamma maps, and dose-volume histograms were used to evaluate the agreement. The isodose plots and dose profiles from the PRESAGE/optical-CT system were in excellent agreement with both the EBT measurements and the ECLIPSE calculation at all points except within 3 mm of the outer edge of the dosimeter where an edge artifact occurred. Excluding this 3 mm rim, gamma map comparisons show that all three distributions mutually agreed to within a 3% (dose difference) and 3 mm (distance-to-agreement) criteria. A 96% gamma pass ratio was obtained between the PRESAGE and ECLIPSE distributions over the entire volume excluding this rim. In conclusion, for the complex IMRT plan studied, and in the absence of inhomogeneities, the ECLIPSE dose calculation was found to agree with both independent measurements, to within 3%, 3 mm gamma criteria.     

Radiochromic film dosimetry with flatbed scanners: a fast and accurate method for dose calibration and uniformity correction with single film exposure

Film dosimetry is an attractive tool for dose distribution verification in intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). A critical aspect of radiochromic film dosimetry is the scanner used for the readout of the film: the output needs to be calibrated in dose response and corrected for pixel value and spatial dependent nonuniformity caused by light scattering; these procedures can take a long time. A method for a fast and accurate calibration and uniformity correction for radiochromic film dosimetry is presented: a single film exposure is used to do both calibration and correction. Gafchromic EBT films were read with two flatbed charge coupled device scanners (Epson V750 and 1680Pro). The accuracy of the method is investigated with specific dose patterns and an IMRT beam. The comparisons with a two-dimensional array of ionization chambers using a 18 x 18 cm2 open field and an inverse pyramid dose pattern show an increment in the percentage of points which pass the gamma analysis (tolerance parameters of 3% and 3 mm), passing from 55% and 64% for the 1680Pro and V750 scanners, respectively, to 94% for both scanners for the 18 x 18 open field, and from 76% and 75% to 91% for the inverse pyramid pattern. Application to an IMRT beam also shows better gamma index results, passing from 88% and 86% for the two scanners, respectively, to 94% for both. The number of points and dose range considered for correction and calibration appears to be appropriate for use in IMRT verification. The method showed to be fast and to correct properly the nonuniformity and has been adopted for routine clinical IMRT dose verification.     

GafChromic EBT film dosimetry with flatbed CCD scanner: a novel background correction method and full dose uncertainty analysis

Film dosimetry using radiochromic EBT film in combination with a flatbed charge coupled device scanner is a useful method both for two-dimensional verification of intensity-modulated radiation treatment plans and for general quality assurance of treatment planning systems and linear accelerators. Unfortunately, the response over the scanner area is nonuniform, and when not corrected for, this results in a systematic error in the measured dose which is both dose and position dependent. In this study a novel method for background correction is presented. The method is based on the subtraction of a correction matrix, a matrix that is based on scans of films that are irradiated to nine dose levels in the range 0.08-2.93 Gy. Because the response of the film is dependent on the film's orientation with respect to the scanner, correction matrices for both landscape oriented and portrait oriented scans were made. In addition to the background correction method, a full dose uncertainty analysis of the film dosimetry procedure was performed. This analysis takes into account the fit uncertainty of the calibration curve, the variation in response for different film sheets, the nonuniformity after background correction, and the noise in the scanned films. The film analysis was performed for film pieces of size 16 x 16 cm, all with the same lot number, and all irradiations were done perpendicular onto the films. The results show that the 2-sigma dose uncertainty at 2 Gy is about 5% and 3.5% for landscape and portrait scans, respectively. The uncertainty gradually increases as the dose decreases, but at 1 Gy the 2-sigma dose uncertainty is still as good as 6% and 4% for landscape and portrait scans, respectively. The study shows that film dosimetry using GafChromic EBT film, an Epson Expression 1680 Professional scanner and a dedicated background correction technique gives precise and accurate results. For the purpose of dosimetric verification, the calculated dose distribution can be compared with the film-measured dose distribution using a dose constraint of 4% (relative to the measured dose) for doses between 1 and 3 Gy. At lower doses, the dose constraint must be relaxed.     

Precautions and strategies in using a commercial flatbed scanner for radiochromic film dosimetry

The purpose of this study was to investigate the value of a commercially available flatbed scanner for film dosimetry with radiochromic film for external radiotherapy. The EPSON Pro 1680 Expression scanner was examined as a densitometer for two-dimensional film dosimetry with Gafchromic EBT film. An accurate and efficient scanning procedure was established. Possible drift and warm-up effects of the scanner were studied and the direct physical influence of the scanner light on the radiochromic film was assessed. Next, we investigated the scan field uniformity. Also, we examined if the accuracy of radiochromic film was improved by subtracting the optical density of the unirradiated blank film from the optical density of the irradiated film. To assess the accuracy of Gafchromic EBT film when the EPSON scanner was used as a densitometer, the depth dose of a 2 x 15 cm(2) field and the in-plane and cross-plane profiles of a 15 x 15 cm(2) field were measured and compared with diamond detector measurements. When taking consecutive scans, we found that the optical density taken from the first scan was about 1% higher than the optical density taken from subsequent scans. We attribute this to the warming up of the lamp of the scanner. Longer-term drift of the scanner was found to be absent. We found that the use of a correction matrix was necessary to correct for the non-uniform scanner response over the scan field. Subtracting the optical density of the unirradiated blank film from the irradiated film improves the precision of the Gafchromic EBT film. Depth dose and profile measurements with Gafchromic EBT film and the diamond detector are in agreement within 2.5%. The EPSON Pro 1680 Expression scanner is an excellent tool for accurate two-dimensional film dosimetry with Gafchromic EBT film provided that some precautions and corrections are taken into account.     

Dosimetric characterization of GafChromic EBT film and its implication on film dosimetry quality assurance

The suitability of radiochromic EBT film was studied for high-precision clinical quality assurance (QA) by identifying the dose response for a wide range of irradiation parameters typically modified in highly-conformal treatment techniques. In addition, uncertainties associated with varying irradiation conditions were determined. EBT can be used for dose assessment of absorbed dose levels as well as relative dosimetry when compared to absolute absorbed dose calibrated using ionization chamber results. For comparison, a silver halide film (Kodak EDR-2) representing the current standard in film dosimetry was included. As an initial step a measurement protocol yielding accurate and precise results was established for a flatbed transparency scanner (Epson Expression 1680 Pro) that was utilized as a film reading instrument. The light transmission measured by the scanner was found to depend on the position of the film on the scanner plate. For three film pieces irradiated with doses of 0 Gy, approximately 1 Gy and approximately 7 Gy, the pixel values measured in portrait or landscape mode differed by 4.7%, 6.2% and 10.0%, respectively. A study of 200 film pieces revealed an excellent sheet-to-sheet uniformity. On a long time scale, the optical development of irradiated EBT film consisted of a slow but steady increase of absorbance which was not observed to cease during 4 months. Sensitometric curves of EBT films obtained under reference conditions (SSD = 95 cm, FS = 5 x 5 cm(2), d = 5 cm) for 6, 10 and 25 MV photon beams did not show any energy dependence. The average separation between all curves was only 0.7%. The variation of the depth d (range 2-25 cm) in the phantom did not affect the dose response of EBT film. Also the influence of the radiation field size (range 3 x 3-40 x 40 cm(2)) on the sensitometric curve was not significant. For EDR-2 films maximum differences between the calibration curves reached 7-8% for X6MV and X25MV. Radiochromic EBT film, in combination with a flatbed scanner, presents a versatile system for high-precision dosimetry in two dimensions, provided that the intrinsic behaviour of the film reading device is taken into account. EBT film itself presents substantial improvements on formerly available models of radiographic and a radiochromic film and its dosimetric characteristics allow us to measure absorbed dose levels in a large variety of situations with a single calibration curve.     

Three-dimensional dose verification for intensity modulated radiation therapy using optical CT based polymer gel dosimetry

Dose distributions generated from intensity-modulated-radiation-therapy (IMRT) treatment planning present high dose gradient regions in the boundaries between the target and the surrounding critical organs. Dose accuracy in these areas can be critical, and may affect the treatment. With the increasing use of IMRT in radiotherapy, there is an increased need for a dosimeter that allows for accurate determination of three-dimensional (3D) dose distributions with high spatial resolution. In this study, polymer gel dosimetry and an optical CT scanner have been employed to implement 3D dose verification for IMRT. A plastic cylinder of 17 cm diameter and 12 cm height, filled with BANG3 polymer gels (MGS Research, Inc., Madison, CT) and modified to optimal dose-response characteristics, was used for IMRT dose verification. The cylindrical gel phantom was immersed in a 24 x 24 x 20 cm water tank for an IMRT irradiation. The irradiated gel sample was then scanned with an optical CT scanner (MGS Research Inc., Madison, CT) utilizing a single He-Ne laser beam and a single photodiode detector. Similar to the x-ray CT process, filtered back-projection was used to reconstruct the 3D dose distribution. The dose distributions measured from the gel were compared with those from the IMRT treatment planning system. For comparative dosimetry, a solid water phantom of 24 x 24 x 20 cm, having the same geometry as the water tank for the gel phantom, was used for EDR2 film and ion chamber measurements. Root mean square (rms) deviations for both dose difference and distance-to-agreement (DTA) were used in three-dimensional analysis of the dose distribution comparison between treatment planning calculations and the gel measurement. Comparison of planar dose distributions among gel dosimeter, film, and the treatment planning system showed that the isodose lines were in good agreement on selected planes in axial, coronal, and sagittal orientations. Absolute point-dose verification was performed with ion chamber measurements at four different points, varying from 48% to 110% of the prescribed dose. The measured and calculated doses were found to agree to within 4.2% at all measurement points. For the comparison between the gel measurement and treatment planning calculations, rms deviations were 2%-6% for dose difference and 1-3 mm for DTA, at 60%-110% doses levels. The results from this study show that optical CT based polymer gel dosimetry has the potential to provide a high resolution, accurate, three-dimensional tool for IMRT dose distribution verification.     

A prototype quantitative film scanner for radiochromic film dosimetry

We have developed a high resolution, quantitative, two-dimensional optical film scanner for use with a commercial high sensitivity radiochromic film (RCF) for measuring single fraction external-beam radiotherapy dose distributions. The film scanner was designed to eliminate artifacts commonly observed in RCF dosimetry. The scanner employed a stationary light source and detector with a moving antireflective glass film platen attached to a high precision computerized X-Y translation stage. An ultrabright red light emitting diode (LED) with a peak output at 633 nm and full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 16 nm was selected as the scanner light source to match the RCF absorption peak. A dual detector system was created using two silicon photodiode detectors to simultaneously measure incident and transmitted light. The LED light output was focused to a submillimeter (FWHM 0.67 mm) spot size, which was determined from a scanning knife-edge technique for measuring Gaussian optical beams. Data acquisition was performed with a 16-bit A/D card in conjunction with commercial software. The linearity of the measured densities on the scanner was tested using a calibrated neutral-density step filter. Sensitometric curves and three IMRT field scans were acquired with a spatial resolution of 1 mm for both radiographic film and RCF. The results were compared with measurements taken with a commercial diode array under identical delivery conditions. The RCF was rotated by 90 deg and rescanned to study orientation effects. Comparison between the RCF and the diode array measurements using percent dose difference and distance-to-agreement criteria produced average passing rates of 99.0% using 3%/3 mm criteria and 96.7% using 2%/2 mm criteria. The same comparison between the radiographic film and diode array measurements resulted in average passing rates 96.6% and 91.6% for the above two criteria, respectively. No measurable light-scatter or interference scanner artifacts were observed. The RCF rotated by 90 deg showed no measurable orientation effect. A scan of a 15 x 15 cm2 area with 1 mm resolution required 22 min to acquire. The LED densitometer provides an accurate film dosimetry system with 1 mm or better resolution. The scanner eliminates the orientation dependence of RCF dosimetry that was previously reported with commercial flatbed scanners.     

Optimal sensitometric curves of Kodak EDR2 film for dynamic intensity modulated radiation therapy verification

Purpose:

To investigate the optimal sensitometric curves of extended dose range (EDR2) radiographic film in terms of depth, field size, dose range and processing conditions for dynamic intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dosimetry verification with 6 MV X-ray beams.

Materials and methods:

A Varian Clinac 23 EX linear accelerator with 6 MV X-ray beam was used to study the response of Kodak EDR2 film. Measurements were performed at depths of 5, 10 and 15 cm in MedTec virtual water phantom and with field sizes of 2x2, 3x3, 10x10 and 15x15 cm². Doses ranging from 20 to 450 cGy were used. The film was developed with the Kodak RP X-OMAT Model M6B automatic film processor. Film response was measured with the Vidar model VXR-16 scanner. Sensitometric curves were applied to the dose profiles measured with film at 5 cm in the virtual water phantom with field sizes of 2x2 and 10x10 cm² and compared with ion chamber data. Scanditronix/Wellhofer OmniPro^TM IMRT software was used for the evaluation of the IMRT plan calculated by Eclipse treatment planning.

Results:

Investigation of the reproducibility and accuracy of the film responses, which depend mainly on the film processor, was carried out by irradiating one film nine times with doses of 20 to 450 cGy. A maximum standard deviation of 4.9% was found which decreased to 1.9% for doses between 20 and 200 cGy. The sensitometric curves for various field sizes at fixed depth showed a maximum difference of 4.2% between 2x2 and 15x15 cm² at 5 cm depth with a dose of 450 cGy. The shallow depth tended to show a greater effect of field size responses than the deeper depths. The sensitometric curves for various depths at fixed field size showed slightly different film responses; the difference due to depth was within 1.8% for all field sizes studied. Both field size and depth effect were reduced when the doses were lower than 450 cGy. The difference was within 2.5% in the dose range from 20 to 300 cGy for all field sizes and depths studied. Dose profiles measured with EDR2 film were consistent with those measured with an ion chamber. The optimal sensitometric curve was acquired by irradiating film at a depth of 5 cm with doses ranging from 20 to 450 cGy with a 3×3 cm² multileaf collimator. The optimal sensitometric curve allowed accurate determination of the absolute dose distribution. In almost 200 cases of dynamic IMRT plan verification with EDR2 film, the difference between measured and calculated dose was generally less than 3% and with 3 mm distance to agreement when using gamma value verification.

Conclusion:

EDR2 film can be used for accurate verification of composite isodose distributions of dynamic IMRT when the optimal sensitometric curve has been established.     

Evaluation of Kodak EDR2 film for dose verification of intensity modulated radiation therapy delivered by a static multileaf collimator

A new type of radiographic film, Kodak EDR2 film, was evaluated for dose verification of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) delivered by a static multileaf collimator (SMLC). A sensitometric curve of EDR2 film irradiated by a 6 MV x-ray beam was compared with that of Kodak X-OMAT V (XV) film. The effects of field size, depth and dose rate on the sensitometric curve were also studied. It is found that EDR2 film is much less sensitive than XV film. In high-energy x-ray beams, the double hit process is the dominant mechanism that renders the grains on EDR2 films developable. As a result, in the dose range that is commonly used for film dosimetry for IMRT and conventional external beam therapy, the sensitometric curves of EDR2 films cannot be approximated as a linear function, OD = c * D. Within experimental uncertainty, the film sensitivity does not depend on the dose rate (50 vs 300 MU/min) or dose per pulse (from 1.0 x 10(-4) to 4.21 x 10(-4) Gy/pulse). Field sizes and depths (up to field size of 10 x 10 cm2 and depth = 10 cm) have little effect on the sensitometric curves. Percent depth doses (PDDs) for both 6 and 23 MV x rays were measured with both EDR2 and XV films and compared with ion chamber data. Film data are within 2.5% of the ion chamber results. Dose profiles measured with EDR2 film are consistent with those measured with an ion chamber. Examples of measured IMRT isodose distributions versus calculated isodoses are presented. We have used EDR2 films for verification of all IMRT patients treated by SMLC in our clinic. In most cases, with EDR2 film, actual clinical daily fraction doses can be used for verification of composite isodose distributions of SMLC-based IMRT.     

Evaluation of GafChromic EBT prototype B for external beam dose verification

The capability of the new GafChromic EBT prototype B for external beam dose verification is investigated in this paper. First the general characteristics of this film (dose response, postirradiation coloration, influence of calibration field size) were derived using a flat-bed scanner. In the dose range from 0.1 to 8 Gy, the sensitivity of the EBT prototype B film is ten times higher than the response of the GafChromic HS, which so far was the GafChromic film with the highest sensitivity. Compared with the Kodak EDR2 film, the response of the EBT is higher by a factor of 3 in the dose range from 0.1 to 8 Gy. The GafChromic EBT almost does not show a temporal growth of the optical density and there is no influence of the chosen calibration field size on the dose response curve obtained from this data. A MatLab program was written to evaluate the two-dimensional dose distributions from treatment planning systems and GafChromic EBT film measurements. Verification of external beam therapy (SRT, IMRT) using the above-mentioned approach resulted in very small differences between the planned and the applied dose. The GafChromic EBT prototype B together with the flat-bed scanner and MatLab is a successful approach for making the advantages of the GafChromic films applicable for verification of external beam therapy.     

Comparison of three high-resolution digitizers for radiochromic film dosimetry

A recently introduced radiographic film scanner from Howtek is evaluated and compared to two other commercially available densitometry systems for its use in radiochromic (RC) film dosimetry in the clinical dose range 0-100 Gy. It has a high-intensity red LED light-source centered at 662 nm (near the major absorption peak for RC film), and is coupled to a CCD linear array detector. This new densitometry system is directly compared to two high-resolution film scanners commonly employed in RC film dosimetry, namely the Lumiscan 75 digitizer (He-Ne laser light source) and the Vidar VXR-16 digitizer (fluorescent light source). A spot densitometer (Nuclear Associates Radiochromic Densitometer) with a filtered 671 nm laser-diode light source is also included as a reference for comparison. The response of the spot densitometer and three high-resolution digitizers is characterized by the dose required to reach a net optical density of 1 (DNOD1), and is 16.0, 37.3, and 46.4 Gy for the Nuclear Associates Radiochromic Densitometer, Howtek MultiRAD 460 and Lumiscan 75 digitizer, respectively. The Vidar VXR-16 does not reach a net optical density of 1. The minimum usable dose at which a 2% level of uncertainty can be achieved (MUD2%) on the three digitizers are 2.6, 6.0, and 38.5 Gy for the Howtek MultiRAD 460, Lumiscan 75, and Vidar VXR-16, respectively. The Howtek MultiRAD 460 shows the greatest sensitivity, lowest MUD2% and best signal-to-noise ratio in the clinical dose range 0-100 Gy. Furthermore, it has no apparent interference (moiré) artifacts that severely limit the low optical density region of the He-Ne laser digitizer. For high-resolution radiochromic dosimetry in the clinical dose range 0-100 Gy, the high-intensity red LED light-source digitizer proves to be the superior modality.     

Verification of IMRT fields by film dosimetry

In intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) the aim of an accurate conformal dose distribution is obtained through a complex process. This ranges from the calculation of the optimal distribution of fluence by the treatment planning system (TPS), to the dose delivery through a multilamellar collimator (MLC), with several segments per beam in the step and shoot approach. The above-mentioned consideration makes mandatory an accurate dosimetric verification of the IM beams. A high resolution and integrating dosimeter, like the radiographic film, permits one to simultaneously measure the dose in a matrix of points, providing a good means of obtaining dose distributions. The intrinsic limitation of film dosimetry is the sensitivity dependence on the field size and on the measurement depth. However, the introduction of a scattered radiation filter permits the use of a single calibration curve for all field sizes and measurement depths. In this paper the quality control procedure developed for dosimetric verification of IMRT technique is reported. In particular a system of film dosimetry for the verification of a 6 MV photon beam has been implemented, with the introduction of the scattered radiation filter in the clinical practice that permits one to achieve an absolute dose determination with a global uncertainty within 3.4% (1 s.d.). The film has been calibrated to be used both in perpendicular and parallel configurations. The work also includes the characterization of the Elekta MLC. Ionimetric independent detectors have been used to check single point doses. The film dosimetry procedure has been applied to compare the measured absolute dose distributions with the ones calculated by the TPS, both for test and clinical plans. The agreement, quantified by the gamma index that seldom reaches the 1.5 value, is satisfying considering that the comparison is performed between absolute doses.     

Clinical use of EBT model Gafchromic film in radiotherapy

The Gafchromic EBT was recently introduced in film dosimetry for external beam therapy (EBT). The high spatial resolution, weak energy dependence, and near-tissue equivalence of EBT films make them suitable for measurement of dose distributions in radiotherapy, especially intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Starting with a sensitometric curve and dose uncertainty relative to the flatbed scanner, the goal of this study was to find an efficient method of correcting for light scattering, and to compare dose distribution supplied by Gafchromic EBT with the distribution obtained with a 2D ion-chamber detector system. Light scattering was analyzed for different levels of dose, and was found to depend on the red-scale value as well as the position of the pixel on the scanner. Many "uniform" films were exposed at different levels of dose to create a two-dimensional matrix correction to take this effect into account. The dose distribution obtained for three clinical beams (10 x 10, 15 x 15 cm open fields and 12 x 12 cm wedge 60 degrees field) were in agreement with those supplied by the 2D array. Gamma index <1 (using 5 mm distance and 5% dose as constraints) for the three fields considered was reached in an average of 98% of the points.     

EDR2 film dosimetry for IMRT verification using low-energy photon filters

Recently the EDR2 (extended dose range) film has been introduced commercially for applications in radiation therapy dosimetry. In addition to characterizing the wide dynamic range, several authors have reported a reduced energy dependence of this film compared to that of X-Omatic Verification (XV) films for megavoltage photon beams. However, those investigations were performed under limited geometrical conditions. We have investigated the dosimetric performance of EDR2 film for the verification of IMRT fields at more clinically relevant conditions by comparing the film doses with the doses measured with an ion chamber and XV films. The effects of using a low energy scattered photon filter on EDR2 film dosimetry was also studied. In contrast to previous reports our results show that EDR2 film still exhibits considerable energy dependence (a maximum discrepancy of 9%, compared with an ion chamber) at clinically relevant conditions (10 cm depth for IMRT fields). However, by using the low-energy filters the discrepancy is reduced to within 3%. Therefore, EDR2 film, in combination with the filters, is found to be a promising two-dimensional dosimeter for verification of IMRT treatment fields.     

Dosimetry of therapeutic photon beams using an extended dose range film

For intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dose distribution verification, multidimensional measurements are required to quantify the steep dose-gradient regions. High resolution, two-dimensional dose distributions can be measured using radiographic film. However, the photon energy response of film is known to be a function of depth, field size, and photon beam energy, potentially reducing the accuracy of dose distribution measurements. The dosimetric properties of the recently developed Kodak EDR2 film were investigated and compared to those of Kodak XV film. The dose responses of both film types to 6 MV and 18 MV photon beams were investigated for depths of 5 cm, 10 cm, and 15 cm and field sizes of 4x4 cm2 and 15x15 cm2. This analysis involved the determination of sensitometric curves for XV and EDR2 films, the determination of dose profiles from exposed XV and EDR2 films, and comparison of the film-generated dose profiles to ionization chamber measurements. For the combinations of photon beam energy, depth, and field size investigated here, our results indicate that the sensitometric curves are nearly independent of field size and depth of calibration. For a field size of 4x4 cm2, a single sensitometric curve for either EDR2 and XV film can be used for the determination of relative dose profiles. For the larger field size, the sensitometric curve for EDR2 film is superior to XV film in regions where the dose falls below 20% of the central axis dose, due to the effects that the increased low energy scattered photon contributions have on film response. The limited field size and depth dependence of sensitometric data measured using EDR2 film, along with the inherently wide linear dose-response range of EDR2 film, makes it better suited to the verification of IMRT dose distributions.     

EBT3胶片数字化的横向响应伪影消除方法

目的：消除EBT3胶片数字化过程中的横向响应伪影,优化EBT3胶片的治疗计划验证结果。方法：覆盖双面镀膜的减反射玻璃进行胶片数字化,通过净光密度与扫描仪不同位置间的抛物线拟合关系来消除横向响应伪影后,借助剂量刻度曲线将胶片净光密度转换为剂量。使用辐照面积较大的治疗计划进行验证,对胶片与计划剂量分布进行γ分析。结果：在3%/3 mm标准下对不小于0.1 Gy的剂量点进行γ分析,消除横向响应伪影后胶片与计划剂量分布的γ通过率为95%,相比未消除横向响应伪影的剂量分布提升了3%的通过率。结论：利用该方法可以有效消除横向响应伪影,提高EBT3胶片治疗计划验证的γ通过率。     

Gafchromic EBT3胶片在螺旋断层放射治疗计划验证中的应用

目的:评估基于Gafchromic EBT3胶片的剂量测量系统用于螺旋断层放射治疗计划验证的可靠性,确定该系统的正确使用方法。 方法:使用Gafchromic EBT3胶片和Vidar DosimetryPro Advantage Red扫描仪组成的剂量测量系统,测试并确定系统的一些重要特性对测量结果的影响。此外,使用该系统验证螺旋断层放射治疗计划,借助Gamma指数分析对胶片测量的剂量分布与计划系统计算结果之间进行比较。 结果:胶片辐照后一开始透光度随时间变化比较明显,直到约4 h以后胶片着色渐趋饱和,4 h内扫描值变化最高达11.6%。扫描仪扫描重复性相对标准差小于0.5%。胶片正反方向放置扫描结果之间差别小于0.6%、横向和纵向放置扫描结果之间差别最高达7.0%。Gamma参数设置为3%/3 mm时,横向和纵向放置扫描验证平均通过率分别为96.5%±2.9%和95.7%±3.6%,方差分析显示两种扫描方式的验证通过率在a=0.05水平上没有统计学差异。 结论:使用文中的胶片剂量测量系统时,应居中放置扫描,并使验证胶片和刻度胶片保持相同的扫描方向。通过直接建立扫描值与胶片吸收剂量之间的一一对应关系,将验证胶片的扫描值转换成吸收剂量的方法简便易行。     

Pencil beam approach for correcting the energy dependence artifact in film dosimetry for IMRT verification

The higher sensitivity to low-energy scattered photons of radiographic film compared to water can lead to significant dosimetric error when the beam quality varies significantly within a field. Correcting for this artifact will provide greater accuracy for intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) verification dosimetry. A procedure is developed for correction of the film energy-dependent response by creating a pencil beam kernel within our treatment planning system to model the film response specifically. Film kernels are obtained from EGSnrc Monte Carlo simulations of the dose distribution from a 1 mm diameter narrow beam in a model of the film placed at six depths from 1.5 to 40 cm in polystyrene and solid water phantoms. Kernels for different area phantoms (50 x 50 cm2 and 25 x 25 cm2 polystyrene and 30 x 30 cm2 solid water) are produced. The Monte Carlo calculated kernel is experimentally verified with film, ion chamber and thermoluminescent dosimetry (TLD) measurements in polystyrene irradiated by a narrow beam. The kernel is then used in convolution calculations to, predict the film response in open and IMRT fields. A 6 MV photon beam and Kodak XV2 film in a polystyrene phantom are selected to test the method as they are often used in practice and can result in large energy-dependent artifacts. The difference in dose distributions calculated with the film kernel and the water kernel is subtracted from film measurements to obtain a practically film artifact free IMRT dose distribution for the Kodak XV2 film. For the points with dose exceeding 5 cGy (11% of the peak dose) in a large modulated field and a film measurement inside a large polystyrene phantom at depth of 10 cm, the correction reduces the fraction of pixels for which the film dose deviates from dose to water by more than 5% of the mean film dose from 44% to 6%.