The GHRH/GHRP-6 test for the diagnosis of GH deficiency in elderly or severely obese men

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: Ageing and obesity result in decreased activity of the GH/IGF-I axis and concomitant impaired GH responses to secretory stimuli. We therefore determined the validity of the GH cut-off value of 15.0 microg/l in the GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)/GH releasing peptide-6 (GHRP-6) test for the diagnosis of GH deficiency in elderly or severely obese men. METHODS: We performed a combined GHRH/GHRP-6 test in ten elderly men (mean age 74 years; mean body mass index (BMI) 24.6 kg/m(2)), nine obese men (mean age 47 years; mean BMI 40.6 kg/m(2)) and seven healthy male controls (mean age 51 years, mean BMI 24.3 kg/m(2)). After assessment of fasting plasma GH, IGF-I and IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), GHRH (100 microg) and GHRP-6 (93 microg) were given intravenously as a bolus injection. Repeated GH measurements were performed for two hours. RESULTS: Both peak GH levels and areas under the curve (AUC) were significantly lower in the obese than in the controls (peak 13.2 vs 53.4 microg/l, P = 0.001; AUC 707 vs 3250 microg/l x 120 min; P = 0.001). Mean GH response in the elderly was lower than in the controls (peak 35.0 microg/l; AUC 2274 microg/l x 120 min), but this was not statistically significant. In contrast, GH peak levels in seven obese men remained below the cut-off level of 15.0 microg/l associated with severe GH deficiency. All others had GH peak levels exceeding this threshold. IGFBP-3 levels were significantly lower in the elderly than in the controls (1.35 vs 2.05 mg/l, P = 0.001). Baseline GH or IGF-I did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSIONS: GH responses following GHRH/GHRP-6 administration were significantly reduced in severely obese men, but were not significantly reduced in elderly men, despite a negative trend. Our data indicate that the cut-off GH level of 15.0 microg/l after GHRH + GHRP-6 administration for the diagnosis of severe GH deficiency cannot be used in severely obese men.     

Complementary secretagogue pairs unmask prominent gender-related contrasts in mechanisms of growth hormone pulse renewal in young adults

The present study examines the thesis that pulsatile GH secretion is controlled simultaneously by three principal signals; viz., GHRH, GH-releasing peptide (GHRP, ghrelin), and somatostatin (SS). According to this ensemble notion, no single regulatory peptide acts alone or can be interpreted in isolation. Therefore, to investigate gender-specific control of pulsatile GH secretion, we designed dual-effector stimulation paradigms in eight young men and six women as follows: 1) L-arginine/GHRH (to clamp low SS and high GHRH input); 2) L-arginine/GHRP-2 (to clamp low SS and high GHRP drive); 3) GHRH/GHRP-2 (to clamp high GHRH and high GHRP feedforward); vs. 4) saline (unclamped). Statistical comparisons revealed that: 1) fasting pulsatile GH secretion was 7.6-fold higher in women than men (P < 0.001); 2) L-arginine/GHRH and L-arginine/GHRP-2 evoked, respectively, 4.6- and 2.2-fold greater burst-like GH release in women than men (P < 0.001 and P = 0.015); and 3) GHRH/GHRP-2 elicited comparable GH secretion by gender. In the combined cohorts, estradiol concentrations positively predicted responses to L-arginine/GHRP-2 (r2= 0.49, P = 0.005), whereas testosterone negatively predicted those to L-arginine/GHRH (r2= 0.56, P = 0.002). Based upon a simplified biomathematical model of three-peptide control, the current outcomes suggest that women maintain greater GHRH potency, GHRP efficacy, and opposing SS outflow than men. This inference upholds recent clinical precedence and yields valid predictions of sex differences in self-renewable GH pulsatility.     

Sustained elevation of pulsatile growth hormone (GH) secretion and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), and IGFBP-5 concentrations during 30-day continuous subcutaneous infusion of GH-releasing peptide-2 in older men and women

We test the interlinked hypotheses that in healthy older adults: 1). i.v. injection of GH-releasing peptide-2 (GHRP-2) and GHRH synergizes more in aging women than men; 2). sc infusion of both GHRP-2 (1 microg/kg.h = 1) and GHRH (1, 3, or 10) for 24 h augments GH secretion more than either agonist alone; and 3). continuous sc delivery of GHRP-2 (1) for 30 d stimulates daily GH secretion and IGF-I, IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), and IGFBP-5. Acute two-peptide synergy was 3-fold greater in young (n = 16) than older volunteers (n = 17; P < 0.025) and was 2.3-fold higher in elderly women than men (P < 0.025). The 24-h infusion of GHRP-2 (1) combined with GHRH (3 or 10) in men and with GHRH (10) in women drove GH secretion more than GHRH alone (P 相似文献   

Effect of acute reduction of free fatty acids by acipimox on growth hormone-releasing hormone-induced GH secretion in type 1 diabetic patients

BACKGROUND: In type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1), high GH basal levels and exaggerated responses to several stimuli have been described. Acipimox is an antilipolytic drug that produces an acute reduction of free fatty acids (FFA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the reduction of plasma FFA with acipimox, alone or in combination with GHRH, on GH secretion in DM1. METHODS: Six type 1 diabetic patients were studied (three women, three men), mean age of 30 +/- 2.1 years, body mass index (BMI) 23.1 +/- 1.5 kg/m2. As a control group, six normal healthy subjects of similar age, sex and weight were studied. Each patient and control received GHRH [1 microg/kg intravenously (i.v.) at min 180], acipimox (250 mg orally at min 0 and 120) and GHRH plus acipimox on three separated days. Subjects served as their own control. Blood samples were taken at appropriate intervals for determination of GH, FFA and glucose. RESULT: In control subjects, the GH area under the curve (AUC; microg/l x 120 min) was for acipimox-treated 1339 +/- 292 and 1528 +/- 330 for GHRH-induced secretion. The GH AUC after the administration of GHRH plus acipimox was 3031 +/- 669, significantly greater than the response after acipimox alone (P<0.05) or GHRH alone (P<0.05). In diabetic patients, the GH AUC was for acipimox-treated 2516 +/- 606 and 1821 +/- 311 for GHRH-induced secretion. The GH AUC after the administration of GHRH plus acipimox was 7311 +/- 1154, significantly greater than the response after acipimox alone (P<0.05) or GHRH alone (P<0.05). The GH response after acipimox was increased in diabetic when compared with normal (P<0.05), with a GH AUC of 1339 +/- 292 and 2515 +/- 606 for normal subjects and diabetic patients, respectively. The GH response after acipimox plus GHRH was increased in diabetic when compared with normal (P<0.05), with a GH AUC of 3031 +/- 669 and 7311 +/- 1154 for normal subjects and diabetic patients, respectively. The administration of acipimox induced a FFA reduction during the entire test. CONCLUSIONS: Reduction of free fatty acids with acipimox is a stimulus for GH secretion in DM1. The combined administration of GHRH plus acipimox induces a markedly increased GH secretion in type 1 diabetic patients when compared with normal subjects. These data suggest that patients with DM1 exhibit a greater GH secretory capacity than control subjects, despite the fact that endogenous FFA levels seems to exert a greater inhibitory effect on GH secretion in these patients.     

Elevated insulin levels contribute to the reduced growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing hormone in obese subjects.

We have recently presented experimental evidence indicating that insulin has a physiologic inhibitory effect on growth hormone (GH) release in healthy humans. The aim of the present study was to determine whether in obesity, which is characterized by hyperinsulinemia and blunted GH release, insulin contributes to the GH defect. To this aim, we used a simplified experimental protocol previously used in healthy humans to isolate the effect of insulin by removing the interference of free fatty acids (FFAs), which are known to block GH release. Six obese subjects (four men and two women; age, 30.8 +/- 5.2 years; body mass index, 36.8 +/- 2.8 kg/m2 [mean +/- SE]) and six normal subjects (four men and two women; age, 25.8 +/- 1.9 years; body mass index, 22.7 +/- 1.1 kg/m2) received intravenous (i.v.) GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) 0.6 microg/kg under three experimental conditions: (1) i.v. 0.9% NaCl infusion and oral placebo, (2) i.v. 0.9% NaCl infusion and oral acipimox, an antilipolytic agent able to reduce FFA levels (250 mg at 6 and 2 hours before GHRH), and (3) euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp (insulin infusion rate, 0.4 mU x kg(-1) x min(-1)). As expected, after placebo, the GH response to GHRH was lower for obese subjects versus normals (488 +/- 139 v 1,755 +/- 412 microg/L x 120 min, P < .05). Acipimox markedly reduced FFA levels and produced a mild reduction of insulin levels; under these conditions, the GH response to GHRH was increased in both groups, remaining lower in obese versus normal subjects (1,842 +/- 360 v 4,871 +/- 1,286 microg/L x 120 min, P < .05). In both groups, insulin infusion yielded insulin levels usually observed under postprandial conditions and reduced circulating FFA to the levels observed after acipimox administration. Again, the GH response to GHRH was lower for obese subjects versus normals (380 +/- 40 v 1,075 +/- 206 microg/L x 120 min, P < .05), and in both groups, it was significantly lower than the corresponding response after acipimox. In obese subjects, as previously reported in normals, the GH response to GHRH was inversely correlated with the mean serum insulin (r = -.70, P < .01). In conclusion, our data indicate that in the obese, as in normal subjects, the GH response to GHRH is a function of insulin levels. The finding that after both the acipimox treatment and the insulin clamp the obese still show higher insulin levels and a lower GH response to GHRH than normal subjects suggests that hyperinsulinemia is a major determinant of the reduced GH release associated with obesity.     

Diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency after pituitary surgery: the combined acipimox/GH-releasing hormone test

OBJECTIVE: Reduction of plasma free fatty acids leads to enhanced GH response after stimulation by GH-releasing hormone (GHRH). We studied the clinical usefulness of combined administration of acipimox and GHRH for the diagnosis of GH deficiency. DESIGN: We evaluated 35 patients [mean age 53.0 years; mean body mass index (BMI) 26.7 kg/m2] after pituitary surgery. We compared GH responses after acipimox and GHRH with the GH response during an insulin tolerance test (ITT) and, in a subgroup of 12 patients, with the GHRH/arginine test. The acipimox/GHRH test was additionally performed in 21 control subjects (mean age 53.8 years; mean BMI 24.7 kg/m2). RESULTS: In the patients, the mean (+/- SEM) peak GH was almost four-fold higher after acipimox/GHRH (6.94 +/- 1.07 microg/l, range 0.46-23.1; P < 0.001) and after GHRH/arginine (8.32 +/- 1.23 microg/l, range 1.1-49.2; P < 0.001) than after ITT (1.84 +/- 0.46 microg/l, range 0.01-11.9). According to the ITT, 29 patients were severely GH deficient (peak GH < 3.0 microg/l). Peak GH levels after acipimox/GHRH in controls ranged from 7.5 to 78.4 microg/l (mean 29.3 +/- 3.5). GH peak values during the acipimox/GHRH test were significantly correlated with values from the ITT (r = 0.63, P < 0.01) and GHRH/arginine test (r = 0.87, P < 0.001). Areas under the curve were also correlated. According to generally accepted cut-off peak GH levels for the ITT and GHRH/arginine test, a GH peak exceeding 11.2 micro g/l excludes severe GH deficiency after acipimox/GHRH. Our control data indicate that the cut-off level is lower at older age. CONCLUSIONS: The acipimox/GHRH test leads to GH responses similar to those of the GHRH/arginine test, and to higher peak GH values if compared with the ITT. The acipimox/GHRH test is a potential additional tool to detect GH deficiency in patients with pituitary disease, in particular in patients with a perturbation of fatty acid metabolism.     

Testosterone supplementation in healthy older men drives GH and IGF-I secretion without potentiating peptidyl secretagogue efficacy

OBJECTIVE: Testosterone supplementation increases GH and IGF-I concentrations in healthy older men via unknown mechanisms. We examine the hypotheses that (i) testosterone amplifies stimulation of GH secretion by GH-releasing peptide (GHRP)-2 or GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) infused with l-arginine to limit somatostatin outflow (i.e. upregulates each agonistic pathway), (ii) testosterone augments the effect of both peptidyl secretagogues infused together (i.e. reduces opposition by hypothalamic somatostatin) and (iii) abdominal visceral fat (AVF) mass is a negative determinant of specific secretagogue-stimulated GH secretion. DESIGN: Randomized double-blind crossover design of placebo versus testosterone administration in healthy older men. METHODS: Deconvolution analysis was used to estimate basal GH secretion and the mass (integral) and waveform (time-shape) of GH secretory bursts. RESULTS: Statistical contrasts revealed that administration of testosterone compared with placebo in seven men aged 60-77 years increased fasting concentrations of GH (P < 0.01) and IGF-I (P = 0.003), and basal (P < 0.005) and pulsatile (P < 0.01) GH secretion. Testosterone did not alter the absolute value or rank order of secretagogue efficacy: l-arginine/GHRP-2 (23-fold effect over saline) = GHRH/GHRP-2 (20-fold) > l-arginine/GHRH (7.5-fold). Waveform reconstruction indicated that each stimulus pair accelerated initial GH secretion within a burst (P < 0.01). Regression analysis disclosed a significant inverse association between GH secretory-burst mass and computer tomography-estimated AVF following stimulation with l-arginine/GHRH after testosterone supplementation (R(2) = 0.54, P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Supraphysiological testosterone concentrations augment GH and IGF-I production in the elderly male without altering maximal somatotrope responses to single and combined GHRH and GHRP-2 drive, thus predicting multifactorial mechanisms of testosterone upregulation.     

Acute dexamethasone administration enhances GH responsiveness to GH releasing peptide-6 (GHRP-6) in man

OBJECTIVE: Acute administration of glucocorticoids stimulates GH secretion probably by a decrease in hypothalamic somatostatin release. GHRP-6 is a synthetic hexapeptide that increases GH secretion by a mechanism of action not yet fully known, but apparently not by inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin release. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of acute dexamethasone administration on GH responsiveness to GHRP-6 in man. DESIGN: One group of subjects received iv GHRP-6 (1 microg/kg), GH-releasing hormone (GHRH; 100 microg), GHRH plus GHRP-6 or saline 3.5 h after oral acute dexamethasone administration (4 mg; at 0600 h). A second study group was treated with GHRP-6, GHRH or GHRP-6 plus GHRH after placebo ingestion, following the same protocol. PATIENTS: Sixteen normal subjects (mean age: 29 +/- 3.3 years), with normal BMI (22.4 +/- 2.0 kg/m2), were studied. Eight subjects received dexamethasone and the other eight were treated with placebo. MEASUREMENTS: Serum GH was measured by a two site monoclonal antibody immunofluorometric assay. RESULTS: In the placebo-treated subjects, mean peak GH (mU/l; mean +/- SE) and AUC (mU.min/l) values after GHRP-6 administration (peak: 43.8 +/- 9.0; AUC: 2262.0 +/- 459. 2) did not differ from those observed after GHRH injection (peak: 49. 8 +/- 12.0; AUC: 2903.4 +/- 872.6). The association of the two peptides markedly increased GH levels (peak: 172.4 +/- 34.2; AUC: 10393.0 +/- 1894.8) compared with the isolated administration of GHRP-6 or GHRH. In the subjects who received dexamethasone 3.5 h before saline injection, GH baseline values were significantly higher than those observed after 90 min of sampling (12.4 +/- 9.4 vs. 4.6 +/- 2.0). Mean GH peak and AUC values after GHRP-6 (peak: 78.8 +/- 11.0; AUC: 4114.6 +/- 588.2) and after GHRH administration (peak: 46.8 +/- 16.0; AUC: 3006.8 +/- 1010.0) did not differ significantly in the dexamethasone-treated subjects. In this study group, the administration of the two peptides together caused a significant increase in both peak (119.2 +/- 16.0) and AUC values (7377.0 +/- 937.2) compared with the response obtained after each peptide alone. When the two groups were compared, a significant increase in GH responsiveness to GHRP-6 was observed after dexamethasone administration compared with placebo. No differences in GH response to GHRH, or to the administration of the two peptides together, were seen between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Oral dexamethasone, at a dose of 4 mg, enhances GH releasing peptide-6-induced GH release when administered 3.5 h earlier. These results suggest that dexamethasone and GHRP-6 could act at different sites of GH releasing mechanisms. Further studies are necessary to elucidate these findings.     

Gonadal status and body mass index jointly determine growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone/GH-releasing peptide synergy in healthy men

CONTEXT: Sex steroid hormones potentiate whereas increased body mass index (BMI) represses GH secretion. Whether sex steroids modify the negative effect of BMI on secretagogue-induced GH secretion in men is not known. The issue is important in designing GH-stimulation regimens that are relatively insensitive to both gonadal status and adiposity. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to compare the relationships between BMI and peptide-stimulated GH secretion in men with normal and reduced testosterone and estradiol availability. SETTING: The study was performed at an academic medical center. SUBJECTS: Healthy young men were included in the study. INTERVENTIONS: Randomized separate-day iv infusion of saline and/or maximally effective doses of L-arginine/GHRH, L-arginine/GH-releasing peptide (GHRP)-2, and GHRH/GHRP-2 in eugonadal (n=12) and experimentally hypogonadal (n=10) men was performed. OUTCOMES: Regression of paired secretagogue-induced GH responses on BMI was determined. RESULTS: In eugonadal men, peak GH concentrations correlated negatively with BMI. In particular, BMI accounted for only 38% of the response variability after L-arginine/GHRH (P=0.0165), but 62% after GHRH/GHRP-2 (P=0.0012) and 65% after L-arginine/GHRP-2 (P=0.00075). In contrast, in hypogonadal men, GH responses were uncorrelated with BMI. The negative effects of BMI on peak GH responses in eugonadal and hypogonadal states differed most markedly after stimulation with GHRH/GHRP-2 (P=0.0019). This contrast was corroborated using integrated GH responses (P=0.0007). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term experimental gonadal sex hormone depletion attenuates dual secretagogue-stimulated GH secretion in lean young men. The inhibitory effect of relative adiposity on GH secretion appears to predominate over that of acute sex steroid withdrawal.     

Growth hormone-releasing peptide-2 infusion synchronizes growth hormone, thyrotrophin and prolactin release in prolonged critical illness

OBJECTIVE: During prolonged critical illness, nocturnal pulsatile secretion of GH, TSH and prolactin (PRL) is uniformly reduced but remains responsive to the continuous infusion of GH secretagogues and TRH. Whether such (pertinent) secretagogues would synchronize pituitary secretion of GH, TSH and/or PRL is not known. DESIGN AND METHODS: We explored temporal coupling among GH, TSH and PRL release by calculating cross-correlation among GH, TSH and PRL serum concentration profiles in 86 time series obtained from prolonged critically ill patients by nocturnal blood sampling every 20 min for 9 h during 21-h infusions of either placebo (n=22), GHRH (1 microg/kg/h; n=10), GH-releasing peptide-2 (GHRP-2; 1 microg/kg/h; n=28), TRH (1 microg/kg/h; n=8) or combinations of these agonists (n=8). RESULTS: The normal synchrony among GH, TSH and PRL was absent during placebo delivery. Infusion of GHRP-2, but not GHRH or TRH, markedly synchronized serum profiles of GH, TSH and PRL (all P< or =0.007). After addition of GHRH and TRH to the infusion of GHRP-2, only the synchrony between GH and PRL was maintained (P=0.003 for GHRH + GHRP-2 and P=0.006 for TRH + GHRH + GHRP-2), and was more marked than with GHRP-2 infusion alone (P=0.0006 by ANOVA). CONCLUSIONS: The nocturnal GH, TSH and PRL secretory patterns during prolonged critical illness are herewith further characterized to include loss of synchrony among GH, TSH and PRL release. The synchronizing effect of an exogenous GHRP-2 drive, but not of GHRH or TRH, suggests that the presumed endogenous GHRP-like ligand may participate in the orchestration of coordinated anterior pituitary hormone release.     

Growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor-1 response to acute and chronic growth hormone-releasing peptide-2, growth hormone-releasing hormone 1-44NH2 and in combination in older men and women with decreased growth hormone secretion

To better appreciate the interactions of GHRP-2 and GHRH 1-44NH₂ on the release of GH in normal adult men and women with decreased GH secretion and low serum IGF-1 levels, a series of acute and chronic studies have been performed (n=5 men, 5 women). The acute iv bolus GH responses of these subjects to the two peptides alone and together suggest that the decreased GH secretion may be primarily due to a deficiency of the natural endogenous GHRP, ghrelin, rather than a decreased secretion of endogenous GHRH or excess secretion of SRIF. To determine whether the low GH response to GHRH was due to a limited capacity of pituitary to release GH, higher dosages of GHRP-2 alone were administered. At a dose of 1 μg/kg GHRP-2 the GH response was essentially the same as that elicited by 1 μg/kg GHRH+0.1μg/kg GHRP-2 while the GH response to 10 μg/kg GHRP-2 sc was about twice as high in both men and women. Although these subjects have a limited pituitary capacity to release GH, which is also an indication of decreased GH secretion in the presence of low serum IGF-1 levels, this alone would not explain the low GH response to GHRH. Furthermore, the finding that a low dose of 0.1 μg/kg GHRP-2 augments the GH response to 1 μg/kg GHRH is strongly against an excess secretion of SRIF. Twenty-four hour profiles of GH secretion during placebo, GHRP-2, and various doses of GHRH alone and together with GHRP-2 were studied. In addition, 1 μg/kg/h GHRP-2 was infused continuously sc to these subjects for 30 d. The normal pulsatile secretion of GH as well as the serum IGF-1 level was increased after 24 h and remained elevated for 30 d. With a deficiency of endogenous GHRH, the GH response of GHRP-2 would be little to none, while in subjects with a deficiency of the natural GHRP, the GH response to GHRH would be more attenuated. Thus, in chronic deficiency the GH response would be expected to depend on the degree of the capacity of the pituitary to release GH as well as the type(s) of hormonal deficiency.     

GH responses to intravenous bolus infusions of GH releasing hormone and GH releasing peptide 2 separately and in combination in adult volunteers

OBJECTIVE Synthetic growth hormone releasing peptides (GHRP) have potent GH-releasing activity in vivo and in vitro. The nature of the Interaction of GHRP and naturally occurring GH releasing hormone (GHRH) is still far from clear. We investigated GH release in response to individual peptide doses or combined doses of GHRH1–29NH₂ and GHRP-2, a novel GH-releasing peptide, in normal adults. DESIGN Subjects underwent three tests in a randomized order: (1) i.v. bolus of GHRH1-29NH₂ (1 μg/kg BW), (2) i.v. bolus of GHRP-2 (1 μg/kg BW), (3) i.v. bolus of GHRH1-29NH ₂ combined with GHRP-2 (same dosages). SUBJECTS Eight healthy non-obese male volunteers, aged 25–34 years. MEASUREMENTS Serum GH concentrations were measured by IRMA at ?15,0, + 10, 20,30,45,60,75,90 and120 minutes after the boluses. RESULTS Peak GH levels in response to GHRH1-29NH ₂, GHRP-2 and the combined GHRH1-29NH ₂ and GHRP-2 administrations were observed between 20 and 45 minutes. Peak GH levels at30 minutes were 32.8 ± 27.3 (mean ± SD), 109.7 ± 56.1 and 140.9 ± 80.6mU/l, respectively. The area under the curve for GH levels (GH AUC) calculated for the first 90 minutes after the GHRH1-29NH ₂ test (2061.2 ± 1601.9mU/1 min) was significantly lower than those after GHRP-2 (6205.1 ± 3216.9mU/l min) and the combined GHRH1-29NH ₂ and GHRP-2 challenge (9788.3 ± 5530.4mU/l min) (P = 0.0003 and P = 0.00005, respectively; palred Student's t-test for log transformed data). Although the GH AUC of the GHRP-2 test and the combined GHRHl-29NH ₂ and GHRP-2 test differed significantly (P = 0.016, t-test), the latter was not signlflcantly dlfferent from the sum of the GH AUCs of each subject after the separate tests. CONCLUSION Although the GH releasing potency of GHRP-2 significantly exceeded that of GHRH1-29NH ₂, we were not able to demonstrate synergy between the two substances. It is possible that GHRP-2 given in our study in higher molar quantities than GHRH1-29NH ₂ masked the effect of the latter.     

Comparison between insulin tolerance test,growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone (GHRH), GHRH plus acipimox and GHRH plus GH-releasing peptide-6 for the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency in normal subjects,obese and hypopituitary patients

OBJECTIVE: It has been gradually realized that GH may have important physiological functions in adult humans. The biochemical diagnosis of adult GHD is established by provocative testing of GH secretion. The insulin-tolerance test (ITT) is the best validated. The ITT has been challenged because of its low degree of reproducibility and lack of normal range, and is contra-indicated in common clinical situations. Furthermore, in severely obese subjects the response to the ITT frequently overlaps with those found in non-obese adult patients with GHD. DESIGN: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic capability of four different stimuli of GH secretion: ITT, GHRH, GHRH plus acipimox (GHRH+Ac), and GHRH plus GHRP-6 (GHRH+GHRP-6), in two pathophysiological situations: hypopituitarism and obesity, and normal subjects. METHODS: Eight adults with hypopituitarism (four female, four male) aged 41-62 Years (48.8+/-1.4 Years), ten obese normal patients (five female, five male) aged 38-62 Years (48.1+/-2.5 Years), with a body mass index of 34.2+/-1.2 kg/m(2), and ten normal subjects (five female, five male) aged 33-62 Years (48.1+/-2.8 Years) were studied. Four tests were performed on each patient or normal subject: An ITT (0.1 U/kg, 0.15 U/kg for obese, i.v., 0 min), GHRH (100 microg, i.v., 0 min), GHRH (100 microg, i.v., 0 min) preceded by acipimox (250 mg, orally, at -270 min and -60 min) (GHRH+Ac); and GHRH (100 microg, i.v., 0 min) plus GHRP-6 (100 microg, i.v., 0 min) (GHRH+GHRP-6). Serum GH was measured by radioimmunoassay. Statistical analyses were performed by Wilcoxon rank sum and by Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: After the ITT the mean peak GH secretion was 1.5+/-0.3 microg/l for hypopituitary, 10.1+/-1.7 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for obese and 17.8+/-2.0 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for normal. GHRH-induced GH secretion was 2+/-0.7 microg/l for hypopituitary, 3.9+/-1.2 microg/l (P=NS vs hypopituitary) for obese and 22.2+/-3.8 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for normal. After GHRH+Ac, mean peak GH secretion was 3.3+/-1.4 microg/l for hypopituitary, 14.2+/-2.7 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for obese and 35.1+/-5.2 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for normal. GHRH+GHRP-6 induced mean peak GH secretion of 4.1+/-0.9 microg/l for hypopituitary, 38.5+/-6.5 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for obese and 68.1+/-5.5 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for normal subjects. Individually considered, after ITT, GHRH or GHRH+Ac, the maximal response in hypopituitary patients was lower than the minimal response in normal but higher than the minimal response in obese subjects. In contrast, after GHRH+GHRP-6 the maximal response in hypopituitary patients was lower than the minimal response in normal and obese subjects. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that, in this group of patients, although both acipimox and GHRP-6 partially reverse the functional hyposomamotropism of obesity after GHRH, but are unable to reverse the organic hyposomatotropism of hypopituitarism, the combined test GHRH+GHRP-6 most accurately distinguishes both situations, without the side effects of ITT.     

The control on growth hormone release by free fatty acids is maintained in acromegaly

Free fatty acids (FFA) physiologically regulate GH release via a negative feedback. The aim of this study was to examine whether such feedback is preserved in acromegaly, a condition in which alterations in other regulatory mechanisms of GH release occur. Eight acromegalic patients (group 1: five women and three men, 43.0 +/- 4.2 yr old, mean +/- SE) received per os on two different days, at a 3 day-interval, in a random order, placebo or 250 mg of acipimox, an inhibitor of lipolysis analogous to nicotinic acid, at 0700 and 1100 h. In both tests GHRH (1-29 NH2), 50 microg, was administered i.v. at 1300 h. Blood samples for GH, FFA, immunoreactive insulin (IRI), and glucose were taken from 0900 to 1500 h, and the time period considered for statistical analysis was 1200-1500 h, representative of steady-state condition for FFA, IRI, and glucose. Mean plasma FFA levels (1200-1500 h) were significantly lower after acipimox than after placebo (0.05 +/- 0.01 vs. 0.17 +/- 0.01 g/L, P < 0.01). In contrast, both mean basal GH levels (1200-1300 h) and the mean GH response to GHRH (GH delta area, 1300-1500 h) were significantly higher after acipimox than after placebo (12.0 +/- 1.9 vs. 7.8 +/- 1.2 microg/L, P < 0.01; 2937 +/- 959 vs. 1154 +/- 432 microg/L x 120 min, P < 0.01). The increase in both basal GH levels and GH delta area occurred in all eight patients. Acipimox also reduced mean serum IRI (83 +/- 12 vs. 112 +/- 14 pmol/L) and blood glucose (5.1 +/- 0.1 vs. 5.7 +/- 0.1 mmol/L) levels, as compared with placebo (P < 0.03 or less). Eight acromegalic patients (group 2: six women and two men, 46.6 +/- 5.7 yr old) underwent a constant i.v. 10% lipid infusion (150 mL/h), started at 0900 h and continued until 1500 h. Mean plasma FFA levels (1200-1500 h) were significantly higher during lipid infusion than after placebo (0.27 +/- 0.01 vs. 0.16 +/- 0.01 g/L, P < 0.02); in contrast, mean basal GH levels (1200-1300 h) were reduced by lipid infusion, as compared with placebo (9.9 +/- 3.1 vs. 16.6 +/- 4.4 microg/L, P < 0.01), and the same occurred for the GH delta area after GHRH (2498 +/- 1643 vs. 4512 +/- 1988 microg/L x 120 min, P < 0.01). Serum IRI and blood glucose levels were similar after placebo and during lipid infusion. These data indicate that, in acromegaly, the acute reduction of circulating FFA levels results in increased GH release, whereas the increase in circulating FFA levels is accompanied by a reduced GH release. Taken together, these findings suggest that, in acromegaly, the control of FFA on GH release is preserved.     

A paradoxical gender dissociation within the growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor I axis during protracted critical illness

Female gender appears to protect against adverse outcome from prolonged critical illness, a condition characterized by blunted and disorderly GH secretion and impaired anabolism. As a sexual dimorphism in the GH secretory pattern of healthy humans and rodents determines gender differences in metabolism, we here compared GH secretion and responsiveness to GH secretagogues in male and female protracted critically ill patients. GH secretion was quantified by deconvolution analysis and approximate entropy estimates of 9-h nocturnal time series in 9 male and 9 female patients matched for age (mean +/- SD, 67+/-11 and 67+/-15 yr), body mass index, severity and duration of illness, feeding, and medication. Serum concentrations of PRL, TSH, cortisol, and sex steroids were measured concomitantly. Serum levels of GH-binding protein, insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs), and PRL were compared with those of 50 male and 50 female community-living control subjects matched for age and body mass index. In a second study, GH responses to GHRH (1 microg/kg), GH-releasing peptide-2 (GHRP-2; 1 microg/ kg) and GHRH plus GHRP-2 (1 and 1 microg/kg) were examined in comparable, carefully matched male (n = 15) and female (n = 15) patients. Despite identical mean serum GH concentrations, total GH output, GH half-life, and number of GH pulses, critically ill men paradoxically presented with less pulsatile (mean +/- SD pulsatile GH fraction, 39+/-14% vs. 67+/-20%; P = 0.002) and more disorderly (approximate entropy, 0.946+/-0.113 vs. 0.805+/-0.147; P = 0.02) GH secretion than women. Serum IGF-I, IGFBP-3, and acid-labile subunit (ALS) levels were low in patients compared with controls, with male patients revealing lower IGF-I (P = 0.01) and ALS (P = 0.005) concentrations than female patients. Correspondingly, circulating IGF-I and ALS levels correlated positively with pulsatile (but not with nonpulsatile) GH secretion. Circulating levels of GH-binding protein and IGFBP-1, -2, and -6 were higher in patients than controls, without a detectable gender difference. In female patients, PRL levels were 3-fold higher, and TSH and cortisol tended to be higher than levels in males. In both genders, estrogen levels were more than 3-fold higher than normal, and testosterone (2.25+/-1.94 vs. 0.97+/-0.39 nmol/L; P = 0.03) and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate concentrations were low. In male patients, low testosterone levels were related to reduced GH pulse amplitude (r = 0.91; P = 0.0008). GH responses to GHRH were relatively low and equal in critically ill men and women (7.3+/-9.4 vs. 7.8+/-4.1 microg/L; P = 0.99). GH responses to GHRP-2 in women (93+/-38 microg/L) were supranormal and higher (P<0.0001) than those in men (28+/-16 microg/L). Combining GHRH with GHRP-2 nullified this gender difference (77+/-58 in men vs. 120+/-69 microg/L in women; P = 0.4). In conclusion, a paradoxical gender dissociation within the GH/ IGF-I axis is evident in protracted critical illness, with men showing greater loss of pulsatility and regularity within the GH secretory pattern than women (despite indistinguishable total GH output) and concomitantly lower IGF-I and ALS levels. Less endogenous GHRH action in severely ill men compared with women, possibly due to profound hypoandrogenism, accompanying loss of the putative endogenous GHRP-like ligand action with prolonged stress in both genders may explain these novel findings.     

Growth hormone (GH) responsiveness to combined administration of arginine and GH-releasing hormone does not vary with age in man

At present, the mechanism(s) underlying the reduced spontaneous and stimulated GH secretion in aging is still unclear. To obtain new information on this mechanism(s), the GH responses to both single and combined administration of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH; 1 microgram/kg iv) and arginine (ARG; 30 g infused over 30 min), a well known GH secretagogue probably acting via inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin release, were studied in seven elderly normal subjects and seven young healthy subjects. Basal GH levels were similar in both groups, while insulin-like growth factor-I levels were lower in elderly subjects (76.7 +/- 9.2 vs. 258.3 +/- 29.2 micrograms/L; P = 0.01). In aged subjects GHRH induced a GH increase (area under the curve, 314.9 +/- 91.9 micrograms/L.h) which was lower (P = 0.01) than that in young subjects (709.1 +/- 114.4 micrograms/L.h). On the other hand, the ARG-induced GH increase in the elderly was not significantly different from that in young subjects (372.8 +/- 81.8 vs. 470.6 +/- 126.5 micrograms/L.h). ARG potentiated GH responsiveness to GHRH in both elderly (1787.1 +/- 226.0 micrograms/L.h; P = 0.0001 vs. GHRH alone) and young subjects (2113.0 +/- 444.3 micrograms/L.h; P = 0.001 vs. GHRH alone). The potentiating effect of ARG on the GHRH-induced GH response was greater in elderly than in young subjects (1013.0 +/- 553.5% vs. 237.9 +/- 79.1%; P = 0.0001); thus, the GH increase induced by combined administration of ARG and GHRH overlapped in two groups. In conclusion, these results show that, differently from the GHRH-induced GH increase, the somatotroph response to combined administration of ARG and GHRH does not vary with age. Our finding suggests that an increased somatostatinergic activity may underlie the reduced GH secretion in normal aging.     

Inhibition of growth hormone release after the combined administration of CHRH and GHRP-6 in patients with Cushing's syndrome

OBJECTIVE In patients with Cushing's syndrome there is a blunted OH response to all types of stimuli. Although Inferential data point towards a direct perturbation in the pituitary exerted by glucocorticoids, the bask mechanism is unknown. His-d -TRP-ALA-TRP-d -Phe-Lys-NH₂ (GHRP-6) is a synthetic hexapeptlde which releases GH by a direct pituitary effect through receptors other than GHRH receptors. Furthermore, the combined administration of GHRH and GHRP-6 is able to induce a large OH discharge even in some pathological states such as obesity, associated with GH blockade. To gain further insight into the disrupted mechanisms of GH secretion, Cushing's syndrome patients were challenged with either GHRH, GHRP-6 or GHRH together with GHRP-6. A group of normal subjects was included for control purposes. DESIGN Three different tests were undertaken: (a) GHRH 100 μg I.v.; (b) GHRP-6 100 μg I.v. and (c) GHRH plus GHRP-6 100 μg I.v. of each; administered to each subject on different days, at least 4 days apart. PATIENTS Ten patients (8 women, 2 men) with untreated Cushing's syndrome, 9 Cushing's disease and 1 adrenal adenoma. Five healthy volunteers (3 women, 2 men) of similar ages served as a control group. MEASUREMENTS Plasma OH levels were measured by immunoradiometric assay. RESULTS The areas under the curve (AUC) of OH secretion (mean ± SEM In μ/1/120 mi) in the control subjects after each test were: GHRH, 1420 ± 330; GHRP-6, 2278 ± 290 and GHRH plus GHRP-6,7332 ± 592 (P < 0·05 vs each compound alone). The AUCs for Cushing's syndrome patients were: GHRH, 248 ± 165; GHRP-6 530 ±170 and for GHRH plus GHRP-6, 870 ± 258 (P < 0·05 vs GHRH alone). After the combined stimulus only one out of the ten patients with hypercortisolism showed a GH peak over 20 μ/l, while ail the controls had a peak over 04mU/l. CONCLUSIONS GHRP-6 induced OH secretion as well as the OH discharge elicited by GHRH and GHRP-6 are considerably reduced in Cushing's syndrome patients. This suggests that the main impairment of GH secretion in that pathological state resides at pituitary level.     

Effects of ghrelin, growth hormone-releasing peptide-6, and growth hormone-releasing hormone on growth hormone, adrenocorticotropic hormone, and cortisol release in type 1 diabetes mellitus

In type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), growth hormone (GH) responses to provocative stimuli are normal or exaggerated, whereas the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis has been less studied. Ghrelin is a GH secretagogue that also increases adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and cortisol levels, similarly to GH-releasing peptide-6 (GHRP-6). Ghrelin's effects in patients with T1DM have not been evaluated. We therefore studied GH, ACTH, and cortisol responses to ghrelin and GHRP-6 in 9 patients with T1DM and 9 control subjects. The GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)-induced GH release was also evaluated. Mean fasting GH levels (micrograms per liter) were higher in T1DM (3.5 ± 1.2) than in controls (0.6 ± 0.3). In both groups, ghrelin-induced GH release was higher than that after GHRP-6 and GHRH. When analyzing Δ area under the curve (ΔAUC) GH values after ghrelin, GHRP-6, and GHRH, no significant differences were observed in T1DM compared with controls. There was a trend (P = .055) to higher mean basal cortisol values (micrograms per deciliter) in T1DM (11.7 ± 1.5) compared with controls (8.2 ± 0.8). No significant differences were seen in ΔAUC cortisol values in both groups after ghrelin and GHRP-6. Mean fasting ACTH values were similar in T1DM and controls. No differences were seen in ΔAUC ACTH levels in both groups after ghrelin and GHRP-6. In summary, patients with T1DM have normal GH responsiveness to ghrelin, GHRP-6, and GHRH. The ACTH and cortisol release after ghrelin and GHRP-6 is also similar to controls. Our results suggest that chronic hyperglycemia of T1DM does not interfere with GH-, ACTH-, and cortisol-releasing mechanisms stimulated by these peptides.     

Growth hormone-releasing peptide-2 stimulates GH secretion in GH-deficient patients with mutated GH-releasing hormone receptor.

GH-releasing peptides (GHRPs) are synthetic peptides that bind to specific receptors and thereby stimulate the secretion of pituitary GH. In vivo it is uncertain whether these peptides act directly on somatotroph cells or indirectly via release of GHRH from the hypothalamus. In this study we compared the pituitary hormone response to GHRP-2 in 11 individuals with isolated GH deficiency (GHD) due to a homozygous mutation of the GHRH receptor (GHRH-R) gene and in 8 normal unrelated controls. Basal serum GH levels were lower in the GHD group compared with controls [0.11 +/- 0.11 (range, <0.04 to 0.38) vs. 0.59 +/- 0.76 microg/L (range, 0.04-2.12 microg/L); P = 0.052]. After GHRP-2 administration there was a 4.5-fold increase in serum GH relative to baseline values in the GHD group (0.49 +/- 0.41 vs. 0.11 +/- 0.11 microg/L; P = 0.002), which was significantly less than the 79-fold increase in the control group (46.8 +/- 17.6 vs. 0.59 +/- 0.76 microg/L; P = 0.008). Basal and post-GHRP-2 serum levels of ACTH, cortisol, and PRL were similar in both groups. Basal levels of serum TSH were significantly higher in the GHD group than in the control group (3.23 +/- 2.21 vs. 1.37 +/- 0.34 microIU/mL; P = 0.003). TSH levels in both groups did not change after GHRP-2 administration. These results suggest that an intact GHRH signaling system is not an absolute requirement for GHRP-2 action on GH secretion and that GHRP-2 has a GHRH-independent effect on pituitary somatotroph cells.