A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway with the facemask and oropharyngeal airway for manual ventilation by first responders in children

In adults, first responders to a cardiopulmonary arrest provide better ventilation using a laryngeal mask airway than a facemask. It is unclear if the same is true in children. We investigated this by comparing the ability of 36 paediatric ward nurses to ventilate the lungs of 99 anaesthetised children (a model for cardiopulmonary arrest) using a laryngeal mask airway and using a facemask with an oropharyngeal airway. Anteroposterior chest wall displacement was measured using an ultrasonic detector. Nurses achieved successful ventilation in 74 (75%) of cases with the laryngeal mask airway and 76 (77%) with facemask and oropharyngeal airway (p = 0.89). Median (IQR [range]) time to first breath was longer for the laryngeal mask airway (48 (39–65 [8–149])) s than the facemask/airway (35 (25–53 [14–120]) s; p < 0.0001). In 10 cases (10%) the lungs were ventilated using the laryngeal mask airway but not using the facemask/oropharyngeal airway. We conclude that ventilation is achieved rapidly using a facemask and oropharyngeal airway, and that the laryngeal mask airway may represent a useful second line option for first responders.     

A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway with facemask and oropharyngeal airway for manual ventilation by critical care nurses in children

Introduction: The European Resuscitation Council recommends the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) for manual ventilation in adult resuscitation if the skills required for the placement of a tracheal tube are unavailable or intubation proves impossible (1). This followed concerns about the ability of inexperienced personnel to provide manual ventilation using traditional facemask and oropharyngeal airway (FM/OA). If inadequate FM/OA ventilation also occurs in children, the LMA may improve airway management during resuscitation. Methods: Local ethical approval was obtained. We trained 19 nurses, experienced in paediatric intensive care, emergency medicine or anaesthetics in the use of the LMA on manikins. They all had prior experience in FM/OA ventilation. Children undergoing elective surgery were studied. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol (3–5 mg·kg⁻¹) or sevoflurane (8% in oxygen/nitrous oxide) followed by a continuous infusion of propofol/remifentanil to produce apnoea. Standard monitoring was applied and an ultrasound sensor placed above the xiphisternum to measure anterior posterior (AP) chest expansion. The consultant paediatric anaesthetist manually ventilated the lungs using FM/OA. The AP chest expansion achieved was defined as the gold standard. The nurse then inserted each airway device in random order and chest expansion was compared with the gold standard. A maximum of three attempts was allowed for each airway device. Prior to the study commencing adequate ventilation was defined as successful if 60% or more of the ‘gold standard’ AP chest expansion was achieved. Results: The 60 children studied had a median age of 4 years (range 7 months–8 years), and median weight of 17 kg (range 8–41 kg). Using an LMA the nurses achieved successful ventilation in 78% of children compared with 71% in the FM/OA group (P = 0.39, chi‐squared test). The LMA was inserted successfully at the 1st attempt in 60%, 2nd attempt in 11% and 3rd attempt in 6% of children. Median time to first successful breath was 38 s (range 11–147 s) for the LMA and 24 s (range 15–48 s) for the FM/GA. ( Figure 1 ).

Figure 1 Open in figure viewer PowerPoint A cumulative frequency plot of the time to first successful ventilation using the laryngeal mask airway or face mask and oropharyngeal airway.     

The laryngeal mask airway in paediatric anaesthesia

Forty-eight children, aged between 2 and 10 years, admitted as day cases for otological surgery were allocated at random into two groups. The first group was anaesthetised using a standard facemask, and the second with a laryngeal mask airway. The laryngeal airway produced a satisfactory airway in all children, and was inserted on the first attempt in 67% of patients. Hypoxia was significantly less frequent in the laryngeal airway group (p less than 0.05), and there were significantly fewer interruptions to surgery than in the facemask group (p less than 0.001). Patient safety, operating and anaesthetic conditions were all considered superior in the laryngeal airway group.     

Use of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway as an alternative to the laryngeal mask airway with positive-pressure ventilation.

BACKGROUND: The cuffed oropharyngeal airway is a modified Guedel-type oral airway with a cuff at its distal end. The objectives of this study were to compare the ability of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway and the laryngeal mask airway to provide positive-pressure ventilation during general anesthesia, and to assess their relative ease of use and ability to reduce total fresh gas flow rates. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized study, a cuffed oropharyngeal airway (n = 25) or a laryngeal mask airway (n = 25) device was inserted after induction of anesthesia intravenously using 2 mg/kg propofol. While anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane and nitrous oxide, the leak pressure, leak fraction (the fractional difference between the inspired and expired tidal volume), minimum fresh gas flow rate, and need for airway manipulations were determined. The anesthesia provider who inserted the device completed an evaluation form at the end of the 15-min study period. RESULTS: Positive-pressure ventilation was established successfully on the first attempt in 92% of the patients when the cuffed oropharyngeal airway was used and in 88% of the patients when the laryngeal mask airway device was used. However, manipulations of the airway device were necessary more frequently (8 vs. 1 patient; P < 0.05) and the leak pressure was less (22 +/- 6 cm water vs. 26 +/- 5 cm water; P < 0.05) with the cuffed oropharyngeal airway than with the laryngeal mask airway. In addition, the leak fraction (0.19 +/- 0.18 vs. 0.31 +/- 0.22; P < 0.05) and the minimum fresh gas flow rate (1.3 +/- 1.5 vs. 2.4 +/- 2.5; P = 0.12) were less in the laryngeal mask airway group. CONCLUSIONS: Positive-pressure ventilation is possible with the laryngeal mask airway and cuffed oropharyngeal airway devices. Although the cuffed oropharyngeal airway can be inserted easily by inexperienced users with a high first-attempt success rate (> 90%), manipulations of the device may be required to maintain a patent airway. The laryngeal mask airway device allows positive-pressure ventilation at slightly greater peak inspiratory pressures.     

ProSeal laryngeal mask airway for cardiac surgery after airway rescue

We present the case of the successful use of a ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in a severe obese 41-year-old women with a difficult airway, scheduled to undergo cardiac surgery (off-pump coronary artery bypass). Two intubation attempts failed and face mask ventilation became impossible with rapidly falling peripheral oxygen saturation. A ProSeal laryngeal airway was railroaded over a tracheal tube guide, a gastric tube was inserted along the drain tube and the patient underwent positive pressure ventilation, resulting in normal gas exchange and an oropharyngeal leak pressure > 40 cm H2O. The decision was taken to proceed with the ProSeal as the airway during the surgical intervention. Surgery was uneventful and the ProSeal was removed on the ICU three hours later. This case reports illustrates the successful use of a guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask for airway rescue in cardiac surgery.     

A comparison of the intubating and standard laryngeal mask airways for airway management by inexperienced personnel

Twenty-four inexperienced participants were timed inserting the intubating laryngeal mask airway and the laryngeal mask airway in 75 anaesthetised subjects. Adequacy of ventilation was assessed on a three-point scale. The pressure at which a leak first developed around the device's cuff was also measured. There was no significant difference in insertion time or the likelihood of achieving adequate ventilation between devices. However, the intubating laryngeal mask airway was better at providing adequate ventilation without audible leak (58/75 (77%) vs. 42/75 (56%); p = 0.009). The median (range [IQR]) pressure at which an audible leak developed was higher for the intubating laryngeal mask airway, 34.5 (14-40 [29-40]) cmH2O, than for the laryngeal mask airway, 27.5 (14-40 [22-33]) cmH2O (p < 0.001). The intubating laryngeal mask airway is worthy of further consideration as a tool for emergency airway management for inexperienced personnel.     

Gas leakage and the laryngeal mask airway: A comparison with the tracheal tube and facemask during spontaneous ventilation using a circle breathing system

The ability of the laryngeal mask airway, tracheal tube and facemask to provide a leak free seal in a clinical setting was assessed by measuring the minimal fresh gas flows needed in a closed circle system during spontaneous ventilation on 60 subjects. The fresh gas flow was reduced until no spillage occurred from the pop-off valve. This fresh gas flow was taken to represent the sum of gas uptake by the subject and gas leakage from the circuit. The median fresh gas flow after 20 minutes was 350 ml. min⁻¹ in the laryngeal mask airway group, 350 ml. min⁻¹ in the tracheal tube group and 450 ml. min⁻¹ in the facemask group. The fresh gas flow required for the facemask group was significantly higher than that for the laryngeal mask airway or tracheal tube groups (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference between the fresh gas flows required for the tracheal tube and laryngeal mask airway groups. We conclude that the laryngeal mask airway provides as good a gas tight seal as a tracheal tube in this context and would be of benefit in reducing anaesthetic gas pollution.     

The use of the laryngeal mask airway by nurses during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

A multicentre study was undertaken to assess the potential value of the laryngeal mask airway when inserted by ward nurses during resuscitation as a method of airway management, prior to the arrival of the Advanced Life Support Team with tracheal intubation capability. The nurses underwent a training programme agreed by all the participating hospitals and followed an identical protocol and data recording system. One hundred and thirty nurses were trained and 164 cases of cardiac arrest were studied. The laryngeal mask airway was inserted at the first attempt in 71% and at the second attempt in 26% of cases. Satisfactory chest expansion occurred in 86% of cases. The mean interval between cardiac arrest and laryngeal mask airway insertion was 2.4 min. Regurgitation of gastric contents occurred before airway insertion in 20 cases (12%), during the insertion in three cases (2%), but there was clinical evidence of pulmonary aspiration in only one patient, who survived to leave hospital. We conclude that the laryngeal mask airway offers advantages over other methods of airway and ventilation management, such as the bag-valve-mask or mouth-to-mouth methods that are currently used by ward nurses in resuscitating patients with cardiac arrest. In this study, the laryngeal mask airway was not being compared with the tracheal tube.     

Management of the paediatric airway: new developments

During the last 2 years, some interesting new devices have been made available to improve airway management in children and infants, and several studies have advanced our understanding concerning risks and benefits of the current practice in the field. Certain risk factors for airway related problems during anaesthesia in children having a cold have been identified, and new aspects of the controversy concerning the use of cuffed endotracheal tubes in children presented. Novel video-assisted systems have been introduced for the management of the difficult airway in paediatric patients, and new applications for well known devices have been suggested, such as the laryngeal mask airway serving as guidance for fibreoptic intubation. Recent studies also demonstrated specific problems with the laryngeal mask airway in infants, as well as the advantages of a new prototypic laryngeal mask airway for children, similar to the ProSeal (LMA International S.A. Group, USA). Furthermore, the following review presents new data about the use of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway, the laryngeal tube, and the Arndt bronchus blocker in paediatric patients.     

Arterial to end-tidal carbon dioxide tension difference in anaesthetized adults mechanically ventilated via a laryngeal mask or a cuffed oropharyngeal airway.

To evaluate arterial (PaCO2), end-tidal (PETCO2) and carbon dioxide tension difference during mechanical ventilation with extratracheal airways, 60 patients ASA physical status I-II, receiving general anaesthesia for minor extra-abdominal procedures were randomly allocated to receive either a cuffed oropharyngeal airway (group COPA, n = 30) or a laryngeal mask (group LMA, n = 30). The lungs were mechanically ventilated by IPPV using a 60% nitrous oxide and 1-1.5% isoflurane in oxygen mixture (VT = 8 mL kg-1; RR = 12 b min-1; l/E = 1/2). After PETCO2 had been stable for at least 10 min after airway placement, haemodynamic variables and PETCO2 were recorded and an arterial blood sample was obtained for measurement of PaCO2. No differences in anthropometric parameters, smoking habit, haemodynamic variables and incidence of untoward events were observed between the two groups. Airway manipulation, to maintain adequate ventilation, was required in only nine patients in the cuffed oropharyngeal airway group (30%) (P < 0.0005); however, in no case was it necessary to remove the designated extratracheal airway due to unsuccessful mechanical ventilation. The mean difference between arterial and end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure was 0.4 +/- 0.3 KPa in the laryngeal mask group (95% confidence intervals: 0.3-0.5 KPa) and 0.3 +/- 0.26 KPa in the cuffed oropharyngeal airway group (95% confidence intervals: 0.24-0.4 KPa) (P = NS). We conclude that in healthy adults who are mechanically ventilated via the cuffed oropharyngeal airway, the end-tidal carbon dioxide determination is as accurate an indicator of PaCO2 as that measured via the laryngeal mask, allowing capnometry to be reliably used to evaluate the adequacy of ventilation.     

Ease of insertion of the laryngeal mask airway by inexperienced personnel when using an introducer

The Portex introducer for the laryngeal mask airway was designed as an aid to successful insertion, acting as an idealised 'artificial hard palate' to guide the tip of the laryngeal mask into the correct position. A number of authors have investigated laryngeal mask insertion by unskilled personnel in certain situations, one example being nurses during in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. We investigated whether the introducer had any effect on the incidence of first-time successful LMA placement by unskilled personnel. These were nonanaesthetist doctors, randomly assigned to have one attempt at LMA insertion in an anaesthetised patient, with and without the introducer. In 44 patients with the LMA being inserted according to the manufacturer's instructions, there was a 68% success rate (14 failures). In 45 patients with the LMA being inserted with the aid of a Portex introducer, there was a 96% success rate (two failures). This was a highly significant improvement (p < 0.001).     

The laryngeal mask and VBM laryngeal tube compared during spontaneous ventilation. A pilot study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The laryngeal tube is a variant of the oesophageal obturator airway. The manufacturer claims that it is an alternative to ventilation with a facemask, laryngeal mask or endotracheal tube. To date, published studies have only involved controlled ventilation. We wished to find out if its use in spontaneous ventilation was equivalent to using the laryngeal mask airway. METHODS: We have compared the laryngeal tube with the laryngeal mask in a randomized prospective study involving patients breathing spontaneously under general anaesthesia. Criteria and a scoring system were used for the comparison. A sequential analysis chart with P=0.01 was chosen for each of two anaesthetists. RESULTS: Only seven and 10 pairs of patients were required to indicate that the laryngeal tube was poorer at airway maintenance than the laryngeal mask. Of the 17 patients who had received the laryngeal tube, successful airway maintenance was only possible in seven. In the remaining 10 patients, the laryngeal tube was abandoned and the rescue airway was the laryngeal mask in all cases. All 17 patients randomized to the laryngeal mask were successfully managed. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the laryngeal tube is not a satisfactory device for management of the airway during spontaneous ventilation.     

The Tulip GT® airway versus the facemask and Guedel airway: a randomised,controlled, cross‐over study by Basic Life Support‐trained airway providers in anaesthetised patients

We performed a randomised, controlled, cross‐over study of lung ventilation by Basic Life Support‐trained providers using either the Tulip GT^® airway or a facemask with a Guedel airway in 60 anaesthetised patients. Successful ventilation was achieved if the provider produced an end‐tidal CO₂ > 3.5 kPa and a tidal volume > 250 ml in two of the first three breaths, within 60 sec and within two attempts. Fifty‐seven (95%) providers achieved successful ventilation using the Tulip GT compared with 35 (58%) using the facemask (p < 0.0001). Comparing the Tulip GT and facemask, the mean (SD) end‐tidal CO₂ was 5.0 (0.7) kPa vs 2.5 (1.5) kPa, tidal volume was 494 (175) ml vs 286 (186) ml and peak inspiratory pressure was 18.3 (3.4) cmH₂O vs 13.6 (7) cmH₂O respectively (all p < 0.0001). Forty‐seven (78%) users favoured the Tulip GT airway. These results are similar to a previous manikin study using the same protocol, suggesting a close correlation between human and manikin studies for this airway device. We conclude that the Tulip GT should be considered as an adjunct to airway management both within and outside hospitals when ventilation is being undertaken by Basic Life Support‐trained airway providers.     

The effects of head flexion on airway seal, quality of ventilation and orogastric tube placement using the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway

This prospective self-controlled study was designed to evaluate the influences of head flexion on airway seal, quality of ventilation, and orogastric tube placement through the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (ProSeal LMA) in 80 anaesthetised, paralysed adult patients. After the ProSeal LMA was inserted and the cuff pressure was set at 5.9 kPa, ventilation quality, airway seal pressure, fibreoptic positions of the cuff and the drainage tube, orogastric tube placement and efficacy of intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) were assessed in two randomly selected positions: neutral and flexed position. When compared to the neutral head position, the head flexed significantly improved the airway seal pressure and the quality of ventilation of the ProSeal LMA (p < 0.05). Fibreoptic scores of the cuff position did not correlate with either the ability to obtain excellent or adequate ventilation through the ProSeal LMA or the ability to generate an airway seal pressure of >or= 2 kPa. Orogastric tube placement via the drainage tube was successful on the first attempt in all patients in the neutral position compared with seven failures following three attempts in the flexed position (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two head positions in the volume of air required to obtain an intracuff pressure of 5.9 kPa, fibreoptic score of the drainage tube position, and expiratory tidal volume and peak inspiratory pressure during IPPV (p > 0.05). In conclusion, head flexion improves airway seal and ventilation quality of the ProSeal LMA. However, placement of an orogastric tube via the drainage tube is impaired in the flexed position compared to the neutral position. Fibreoptic scoring of the ProSeal cuff position is not an accurate test to assess the airway seal and ventilation function.     

The pressor response after laryngeal mask or cuffed oropharyngeal airway insertion

BACKGROUND: Since the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA) has been suggested to cause less pharyngeal trauma than the laryngeal mask airway (LMA), we conducted a prospective, randomised study to compare haemodynamic changes after placing either the COPA or LMA in healthy anaesthetised adults. METHODS: After standard midazolam premedication (0.05 mg kg(-1) IV), general anaesthesia (IV propofol 2 mg kg(-1)) was induced in 60 ASA physical status I-II, 18-65-yr-old patients, who were randomly allocated to receive COPA (n=30) or LMA (n= 30) placement and then mechanically ventilated using a 60% nitrous oxide and 1% isoflurane in oxygen mixture (TV=8 ml kg(-1), RR=12 b.p.m., I/E=1/2). Haemodynamic variables were recorded 20 min after the midazolam premedication (baseline), and then every 1 min until 10 min after general anaesthesia induction. RESULTS: Nine patients of group COPA (30%) required chin lift, jaw thrust or head tilt to maintain adequate ventilation, while no problems were observed in the LMA group (P<0.0005); however, in no case did the designed extratracheal airway have to be removed due to unsuccessful mechanical ventilation, and no signs of gastric insufflation or regurgitation were reported. The maximum mean changes in haemodynamic variables were more marked after LMA placement (SAP: 12%+/-13%; DAP: 11%+/-18%; HR: 13%+/-16%) than COPA placement (SAP: -3%+/-18%; DAP: -5%+/-16%; HR: 4%+/-13%) (P<0.005, P<0.005, and P<0.01 for SAP, DAP and HR, respectively). Group LMA showed higher SAP and DAP values than group COPA only during the first 3 min after airway insertion. CONCLUSION: In healthy, anaesthetised patients, placing a cuffed oropharyngeal airway is associated with smaller cardiovascular changes after airway insertion compared with the laryngeal mask airway.     

A comparison of two techniques for manual ventilation of the lungs by non-anaesthetists: the bag-valve-facemask and the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA) apparatus

In order to evaluate the possible role of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, we compared its use by non-anaesthetists with the bag-valve-facemask technique of providing ventilation. A group of anaesthetic nurses and operating department practitioners were asked to manually ventilate the lungs of 40 patients undergoing elective surgery following the induction of general anaesthesia with neuromuscular blockade. Ventilation was first attempted using the bag-valve-facemask technique and then using the appropriate size cuffed oropharyngeal airway and self-inflating bag. Ventilation was clinically adequate in 32/40 (80%) patients using the bag-valve-facemask and in 38/40 (95%) patients using the cuffed oropharyngeal airway. Measured expired tidal volumes were greater using the cuffed oropharyngeal airway than with bag-valve-facemask ventilation in two-thirds of patients, despite a higher incidence of audible air leak. Successful ventilation was achieved using the cuffed oropharyngeal airway in seven of the eight patients in whom bag-valve-facemask ventilation was inadequate. The cuffed oropharyngeal airway may offer an effective method of providing ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation by non-anaesthetic hospital staff, particularly when attempted ventilation using a bag-valve-facemask technique is proving ineffective.     

The use of the LMA-ProSeal in airway resuscitation

Insufflation of the stomach with air can be a complication of face mask ventilation in the case of airway obstruction. Although the laryngeal mask airway has proven value in airway resuscitation, it has two major failings: a relatively low seal pressure and lack of access to the alimentary tract. A case is reported in which failed intubation (by multiple techniques) and intermittent face mask ventilation resulted in gastric distension, decreased airway compliance, and compromised gas exchange. The patient experience oxyhemoglobin saturation that did not improve despite laryngeal mask ventilation. The patient was resuscitated with a LMA-ProSeal, which permitted ventilation with high airway pressures. Return of oxyhemoglobin saturation occurred after decompression of the stomach with a gastric tube inserted via the LMA-ProSeal's gastric drain.     

The cuffed oropharyngeal airway vs. the laryngeal mask airway: a randomised cross-over study of oropharyngeal leak pressure and fibreoptic view in paralysed patients

We conducted a randomised cross-over study of 20 patients to test the hypothesis that oropharyngeal leak pressure and the fibreoptic view differ between the cuffed oropharyngeal airway and laryngeal mask airway in paralysed patients. We also tested the design premise that inflation of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway cuff elevates the epiglottis from the posterior pharyngeal wall. Both airways were inserted into each patient in random order. Oropharyngeal leak pressure and fibreoptic view were documented at zero volume and after each additional 10 ml up to the maximum recommended volume for each device. The laryngeal mask had a higher maximum (23 vs. 16 cmH2O, p = 0.03), minimum (9 vs. 2 cmH2O, p < 0.02) and overall (17 vs. 9 cmH2O, p < 0.001) oropharyngeal leak pressure compared with the cuffed oropharyngeal airway. The glottic inlet was visible more frequently with the laryngeal mask (96 vs. 39%, p < 0.0001). There was no elevation of the epiglottis from the posterior pharyngeal wall with the cuffed oropharyngeal airway. We conclude that the laryngeal mask forms a more effective seal and provides a better fibreoptic view of the glottic inlet than the cuffed oropharyngeal airway in paralysed patients. Inflation of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway cuff does not cause elevation of the epiglottis.     

Cuffed oropharyngeal airway as a suitable alternative to the laryngeal mask airway for minor outpatient surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To compare the application of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway and the laryngeal mask airway on anaesthetized adult patients undergoing minor outpatient surgery. METHODS: One hundred patients received intravenous fentanyl, propofol and N20 for the induction and maintenance of anaesthesia. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: a cuffed oropharyngeal airway group (n = 50) and a laryngeal mask airway group (n = 50). After insertion of the device, fibreoptic laryngoscopy was attempted and the degree of success scored. We then compared the first application success rate of both procedures while judging airway intervention requirement, fibreoptic scores, adverse airway events and haemodynamic tolerance. RESULTS: Both devices had an almost similar first-time placement rate (cuffed oropharyngeal airway 84% versus laryngeal mask airway 96%). The cuffed oropharyngeal airway required a higher number of airway interventions (P < 0.001). The laryngeal mask airway had a significantly better fibreoptic view compared with the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (P < 0.001). However, the number of adverse airway events was lower in the cuffed oropharyngeal airway group; there were no significant differences in adverse events and haemodynamic variables between the said two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the cuffed oropharyngeal airway was an effective alternative airway in spontaneously breathing patients during short procedures.     

Use of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway for manual ventilation by nonanaesthetists

We studied the use of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway in 100 ASA I and II anaesthetised patients. In the first 50 patients (group A), an experienced anaesthetist inserted the airway. The optimum sizes and cuff volumes for manual ventilation in adult males and females were found to be sizes 11 and 10 with up to 60 ml and 50 ml in each cuff, respectively. Manual ventilation was clinically successful in 49/50 (98%) of these patients. Using these recommendations and following a brief tutorial, a group of 50 nonanaesthetic, basic life-support providers attempted to insert a cuffed oropharyngeal airway and manually ventilate the lungs of a subsequent 50 patients (group NA). Clinically adequate tidal volumes were achieved within 45 s in 47/50 (94%) patients in this group. A persistent leak was present in 21/49 (43%) and 24/47 (51%) of the successful insertions in each group, but this did not affect the ability to ventilate the lungs adequately. The cuffed oropharyngeal airway may offer an effective method of providing adequate ventilation during resuscitation by nonanaesthetic hospital staff.