The influence of diabetes mellitus on acute and late clinical outcomes following coronary stent implantation

Objectives. We compared the clinical outcomes following coronary stent implantation in insulin-treated diabetes mellitus (IDDM), non-IDDM patients, and nondiabetic patients.Background. Diabetic patients have increased restenosis and late morbidity following balloon angioplasty. The impact of diabetes mellitus (DM), especially IDDM, on in-stent restenosis is not known.Methods. We studied 954 consecutive patients with native coronary artery lesions treated with elective Palmaz-Schatz stents implantation using conventional coronary angiographic and intravascular ultrasound methodology. Procedural success, major in-hospital complications, and 1-year clinical outcome were compared according to the diabetic status.Results. In-hospital mortality was 2% in IDDM, significantly higher (p <0.02) compared with non-IDDM (0%) and nondiabetics (0.3%). Stent thrombosis did not differ among groups (0.9% in IDDM vs. 0% in non-IDDM and 0% in nondiabetics, p >0.1). During follow-up, target lesion revascularization (TLR) was 28% in IDDM, significantly higher (p <0.05) compared with non-IDDM (17.6%) and nondiabetics (16.3%). Late cardiac event–free survival (including death, myocardial infarction [MI], and any coronary revascularization procedure) was significantly lower (p = 0.0004) in IDDM (60%) compared with non-IDDM (70%) and nondiabetic patients (76%). By multivariate analysis, IDDM was an independent predictor for any late cardiac event (OR = 2.05, p = 0.0002) in general and TLR (odds ratio = 2.51, p = 0.0001) in particular.Conclusions. In a large consecutive series of patients treated by elective stent implantation, IDDM patients were at higher risk for in-hospital mortality and subsequent TLR and, as a result, had a significantly lower cardiac event–free survival rate. On the other hand, acute and long-term procedural outcome was found to be similar for non-IDDM compared with nondiabetic patients.     

Outcomes after unrestricted use of everolimus-eluting stent compared to paclitaxel- and sirolimus-eluting stents

Compared to paclitaxel-eluting stents (PESs) and sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs), a paucity of data exists regarding the clinical outcome of everolimus-eluting stents (EESs) in unselected patients with the entire spectrum of obstructive coronary artery disease. The present study cohort included 6,615 consecutive patients at Washington Hospital Center who underwent coronary artery stent implantation with EESs (n = 519), PESs (n = 2,036), or SESs (n = 4,060). Patients who received bare metal stents, zotarolimus-eluting stents, or 2 different drug-eluting stent types were excluded. The analyzed clinical end points were death, death or Q-wave myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization, definite stent thrombosis, and major adverse cardiac events, defined as the composite of death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, or TLR at 1 year. The groups were well matched for the conventional risk factors for coronary artery disease, except for systemic hypertension, which differed among the groups. The unadjusted end points for EESs and PESs were death (4.5% vs 7.1%; p = 0.03), TLR (3.4% vs 4.6%; p = 0.24), target vessel revascularization (5.6% vs 7.1%; p = 0.46), death or Q-wave myocardial infarction (4.5% vs 7.4%; p = 0.02), and definite stent thrombosis (0.0% vs 0.7%; p = 0.09). The unadjusted end points for EES and SES were death (4.5% vs 5.2%; p = 0.45), TLR (3.4% vs 5.8%; p = 0.3), target vessel revascularization (5.6% vs 8.6%; p = 0.05), death or Q-wave myocardial infarction (4.5% vs 5.4%; p = 0.39), and definite stent thrombosis (0.0% vs 1.08%; p = 0.003). The rates of major adverse cardiac events were similar among the 3 groups. After multivariate analysis, the rate of death or Q-wave myocardial infarction between the EES and PES groups was no longer significant (hazard ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 0.59 to 2.20, p = 0.70). In conclusion, the results of the present study suggest the use of EES in routine clinical practice is both safe and effective but offers no clinically relevant advantage in terms of hard end points compared to PES or SES.     

Short- and long-term results after multivessel stenting in diabetic patients

OBJECTIVES: The present study evaluated clinical outcomes in diabetic patients after multivessel stenting. BACKGROUND: Multivessel angioplasty studies have reported decreased survival in diabetic patients undergoing conventional balloon angioplasty compared with coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). However, several studies have demonstrated excellent procedural success and acceptable clinical outcomes after multivessel stenting. METHODS: Multivessel stenting was performed in 689 patients with 1,639 native coronary lesions. Patients were classified into three groups according to diabetes mellitus (DM) status: 1) no DM (501 patients/1,200 lesions); 2) DM treated with oral agents (102 patients/235 lesions); and 3) DM treated with insulin (86 patients/204 lesions). RESULTS: Procedural success was high overall. In-hospital CABG was higher in diabetics treated with insulin compared with the other two groups (3.5% vs. 0.4% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in the incidence of in-hospital cardiac death and myocardial infarction. Diabetic patients treated with oral agents or insulin had higher one-year target lesion revascularization rates than non-diabetic patients (25% vs. 35% vs. 16%, p < 0.001). Lower one-year survival was observed in diabetic patients treated with either oral agents or insulin, compared with non-diabetic patients (85% vs. 86% vs. 95%, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, DM was an independent predictor of one-year mortality, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization after multivessel stenting. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a high technical success rate of multivessel stenting, diabetic patients, especially those treated with insulin, have higher in-hospital CABG, higher subsequent revascularization rates, and lower one-year survival than non-diabetic patients.     

Comparison of safety and efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents versus bare metal stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) are superior to bare metal stents (BMSs) for percutaneous coronary intervention, but data regarding SESs in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are limited. We investigated the clinical outcomes of patients with STEMI who were treated with SESs. We measured clinical characteristics and acute and long-term outcomes in 306 consecutive patients with STEMI who received a SES (n = 156) or a BMS (n = 150). Patients were followed for death, nonfatal reinfarction, and target vessel revascularization. Patients with SESs had a 0.6% in-hospital mortality rate versus 5.3% in patients with BMSs (p = 0.015). Six-month mortality rates were 1.9% (SES) and 10.1% (BMS, p = 0.003). At 6 months, patients with SESs were less likely to have target vessel revascularization (1.3% vs 8.1%, p = 0.005) and achieve the composite end point (3.2% vs 16.1%, p = 0.0001). No subacute thrombosis or clinical restenosis occurred in the SES group. Patients who received BMSs were older, received more stents, and had more myocardial damage, worse renal function, and lower ejection fractions than did those in the SES group. By multivariate discriminant analysis, stent type (SES vs BMS) was the most significant determinant of the 6-month composite end point (p = 0.01) and the need for target vessel revascularization (p = 0.02). In conclusion, SESs are safe and effective in STEMI at 6 months.     

Impact of diabetes mellitus type 2 on in-hospital outcome after cardiac catheterizations in a large cohort of octogenarians

AIM: To assess the impact of diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM) in 1085 octogenarians on in-hospital outcome after cardiac catheterization (CATH) and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 1085 consecutive octogenarians [82.6+/-2.6 years; 401 DM, 684 without DM (non-DM)]. Age, acute myocardial infarctions (DM: 26%, non-DM: 21%) and extent of disease (three-vessel disease, DM: 34%, non-DM: 31%) were similar in both groups. There was a similar percentage of interventions (PCI: DM: 30% vs. non-DM: 29%; bypass surgery: DM: 30% vs. non-DM: 25%) performed in both groups. Thirty-one patients (2.9%) died during hospital stay (DM: 2.2%; non-DM: 3.2%; p=0.46) of whom 16 died (DM: 1.0%; non-DM: 1.9%) during (n=4) or after (n=12) interventions in patients who were already admitted in cardiogenic shock. At the puncture site, 87 complications occurred (DM 6.5% vs. non-DM 6.4%, p=0.87). Stepwise logistic regression analyses identified DM as an independent predictor of adverse events during CATH, but not PCI. Furthermore, DM was not a predictor for vascular complications. CONCLUSIONS: Catheterization-related complication rates are different in diabetic as compared to nondiabetic patients during CATH, but not PCI. Octogenarians should be granted access to an invasive treatment strategy even in the presence of DM.     

Effectiveness of and adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with mild versus severe renal failure

Patients with renal failure undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) experience reduced procedural success rates and increased in-hospital and long-term follow-up major adverse cardiac events. This study was designed to determine whether the severity of preprocedural renal failure influences the outcomes of patients with renal failure undergoing PCI. We compared the immediate and long-term outcomes of 192 patients with mild renal failure (creatinine 1.6 to 2.0 mg/dl, mean 1.76) with those of 131 patients with severe renal failure (creatinine >2.0 mg/dl, mean 2.90), selected from 3,334 consecutive patients undergoing PCI between 1994 and 1997. Although the overall population with renal failure represents a high-risk group, the severe renal failure cohort had a higher incidence of hypertension, multivessel disease, prior coronary bypass surgery, vascular disease, and congestive heart failure (all p values <0.05), yet had similar angiographic characteristics. Procedural success was higher in the group with severe renal failure (93.7% vs 87.7%, p = 0.04). There were no statistically significant differences in in-hospital mortality (11.5% vs 9.9%, p = 0.7), Q-wave myocardial infarction (0.5% vs 0%, p = 0.4), emergent bypass surgery (0% vs 0%, p = 1.0), and in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (11.5% vs 9.9%, p = 0.7) between the mild and severe renal groups, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed no statistically significant difference in long-term survival (log rank test, p = 0.1) or event-free survival (log rank test, p = 0.3) between the 2 groups. Finally, creatinine was not identified as an independent predictor of in-hospital or long-term follow-up major adverse cardiac events. In our high-risk population, patients with mild renal insufficiency undergoing PCI experience major adverse outcomes in the hospital and at long-term follow-up similar to those of patients with severe renal failure.     

Clinical and angiographic outcome after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in aorto-ostial lesions.

OBJECTIVES: This observational study evaluated the clinical and angiographic outcomes of patients with aorto-ostial coronary artery disease treated with sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) or with bare metal stents (BMSs). BACKGROUND: The safety and effectiveness of SESs for the treatment of aorto-ostial lesions have not been demonstrated. METHODS: We identified 82 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary interventions in 82 aorto-ostial lesions using the SES (32 patients) or BMS (50 patients) and compared the two groups of patients. The incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including death or Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), and target vessel revascularization (TVR), were recorded in-hospital and at a 10-month follow-up. RESULTS: All stents were implanted successfully. There were no statistically significant differences regarding major in-hospital complications between the two groups. At 10-month follow-up, two (6.3%) patients in the SES group and 14 (28%) patients in the BMS group underwent TLR (p = 0.01); MACE were less frequent in the SES group compared to the BMS group (19% vs. 44%, p = 0.02). Angiographic follow-up showed lower binary restenosis rates (11% vs. 51%, p = 0.001) and smaller late loss (0.21 +/- 0.31 mm vs. 2.06 +/- 1.37 mm, p < 0.0001) in the SES group. CONCLUSIONS: The main finding of our study is that, compared to the BMS, implantation of the SES in aorto-ostial lesions appears safe and effective, with no increase in major in-hospital complications and a significant improvement in restenosis and late event rates at 10-month follow-up.     

Clinical outcomes of compromised side branch (stent jail) after coronary stenting with the NIR stent.

Acute side-branch (SB) compromise or occlusion stent jail after native coronary stenting is a matter of concern. Attempts at maintaining SB patency can be a technical challenge. The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical impact of SB compromise or occlusion in patients undergoing stenting of parent vessel lesions. We evaluated in-hospital and long-term clinical outcomes (death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization rates at 6 months) in 318 consecutive patients undergoing NIR stent implantation across an SB. Based on independent angiographic analysis, 218 (68.6%) patients had no poststent SB compromise, 85 (26.7%) patients had narrowed SB (> 70% narrowing, without total occlusion), and 15 (4.7%) patients had an occluded SB after stent implantation. The baseline patient and lesion characteristics were similar between the groups. Procedural success was 100%. Patients with SB occlusion had a higher stents/lesion ratio (P < 0.006). Side-branch occlusion was associated with higher in-hospital ischemic complications (Q-wave myocardial infarction, 7%; non-Q-wave myocardial infarction, 20%; P < 0.05) compared to patients with SB compromise or normal SB. At 6-month follow-up, there was a trend for more myocardial infarctions in the group with SB occlusion during the index procedure (Q-wave myocardial infarction, 7% vs. 1% in the narrowed and 0% in normal SB; P = 0.09). However, late target lesion revascularization and mortality were similar in the three groups (P = 0.91). SB occlusion after parent vessel stenting is associated with more frequent in-hospital Q-wave and non-Q-wave myocardial infarctions. However, with the NIR stent, side-branch compromise or occlusion does not influence late (6 month) major adverse events, including death, myocardial infarction, or need for repeat revascularization.     

Clinical impact of nephropathy induced by contrast medium in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing emergent coronary angiography

OBJECTIVES: The incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) after coronary angiography and the prognostic value in patients with acute myocardial infarction remains to be determined. This study investigated the frequency, predictors of CIN, and the prognostic significance of CIN in acute myocardial infarction patients undergoing emergent coronary angiography. METHODS: This study included 132 consecutive acute myocardial infarction patients undergoing emergent coronary angiography within 24 hr after the onset between January 1999 and June 2001. The serum creatinine concentration was measured on admission and at 48 hr after contrast medium exposure. CIN was defined as an increase in serum creatinine from the baseline > or = 0.5 mg/dl or > or = 25% at 48 hr after emergent coronary angiography. The patient characteristics, and in-hospital and long-term mortality were compared between the CIN and non-CIN groups. RESULTS: CIN occurred in 15 patients (11.4%) after emergent coronary angiography. The predictor of CIN development was preexisting renal impairment (serum creatinine concentration > or = 1.2 mg/dl on presentation; 21.9% vs 8.0%, odds ratio 3.22, 95% confidence interval 1.07-9.74, p = 0.04). In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in the CIN group than in the non-CIN group (13.3% vs 1.7%; odds ratio 8.85, 95% confidence interval 1.15-68.2, p = 0.01). The long-term mortality (mean follow-up period of 40 months) was also higher in the CIN group (26.7% vs 8.6%; hazard ratio 3.91, 95% confidence interval 1.21-12.5, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: CIN was an independent predictor of both in-hospital and long-term mortality in acute myocardial infarction patients undergoing emergent coronary angiography. Preexisting renal insufficiency was associated with subsequent CIN.     

Influence of diabetes mellitus on early and late clinical outcomes in saphenous vein graft stenting

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare early and late clinical outcomes in diabetic and nondiabetic patients after stent implantation in saphenous vein grafts (SVG). BACKGROUND: Patients with diabetes mellitus have less favorable acute and long-term outcomes after stent implantation in native coronary arteries. The impact of diabetes on SVG stenting, however, is not known. METHODS: We studied 908 consecutive patients (1,366 SVG lesions) treated with Palmaz-Schatz stents. In-hospital and late clinical outcomes (death, Q-wave myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization rates at one year) were compared between diabetic (n = 290) and nondiabetic (n = 618) patients. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in diabetic as compared with nondiabetic patients (2.2% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.003). At one-year follow-up, target lesion revascularization (TLR) was 16.6% in diabetic and 12.3% in nondiabetic patients (p = 0.03). Overall cardiac event-free survival (freedom from death, Q-wave myocardial infarction and any coronary revascularization procedure) at one year was significantly lower in the diabetic (68%) compared with the nondiabetic patients (79%, p = 0.0003). By Cox regression analysis, diabetes mellitus was an independent predictor of both TLR (relative risk: 1.23; confidence interval: 0.96 to 1.58; p = 0.004) and late cardiac events (relative risk: 1.40; confidence interval: 1.05 to 1.86; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with diabetes undergoing stent implantation in SVG have: 1) higher in-hospital and late mortality, 2) higher one-year TLR rates, and 3) significantly lower one-year cardiac event-free survival. Thus, diabetic patients have less favorable acute and late clinical outcomes after stent implantation in SVG lesions.     

2型糖尿病对冠状动脉左主干病变介入治疗预后的影响

目的:探讨合并2型糖尿病对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的冠状动脉左主干病变患者预后的影响.方法:回顾性分析中国医学科学院阜外医院2004年1月至2015年12月接受PCI的冠状动脉左主干病变的患者3960例.根据患者是否合并2型糖尿病分为糖尿病组(1084例)和非糖尿病组(2876)例.收集纳入患者的临床资料、实...     

Clinical impact of drug-eluting stents in an unselected population of diabetic patients

BACKGROUND: Drug-eluting stents (DES) have been shown in randomized trials to reduce clinical events in diabetic patients. Our aim was to determine whether these clinical results are applicable in an unselected population of patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). METHODS: We studied 440 consecutive patients (271 NIDDM and 169 IDDM) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention, divided into 2 cohorts: Group A (1998-2000): 220 patients with bare metal stents, and Group B (2002-2004): 220 patients with drug-eluting stents. We analyzed major coronary adverse events (death, nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization) over a mean follow-up of 18+/-15 months. RESULTS: Group B had more patients who were insulin-dependent (44.5 versus 32.3% p<0.001) or had hypertension (64.5 versus 54.1%; p=0.02), a lower left ventricular ejection fraction (53.89 versus 56.8%; p=0.04), more complex lesions (B2/C) (82.7 versus 62.3%; p<0.001), more treated lesions (1.40 versus 1.26; p<0.001), more stents implanted (1.69 versus 1.15; p<0.0001), and more patients treated with abciximab (76.8 versus 42.7%; p<0.0001). During the follow-up, Group B had fewer major adverse coronary events (11.7 versus 27.9%; p<0.001) and a reduction in target lesion revascularization (3.9 versus 17.2%; p<0.001), with no differences in death or myocardial infarction. Both groups experienced a significant reduction in events (NIDDM: 8.1 versus 26.7%; p<0.001 and IDDM: 16 versus 31.9%; p=0.016). Multivariate regression analysis showed the use of drug-eluting stents to be in direct relation with event-free survival (odds ratio [OR]: 3.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44-7.90; p=0.005). CONCLUSION: Despite the worse angiographic characteristics, the use of DES reduced clinical events, particularly target lesion revascularization.     

An early revascularization strategy is associated with a survival benefit for diabetic patients in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND: The role of diabetes mellitus (DM) in cardiogenic shock (CS) complicating an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is not well understood. Previous studies have reported an in-hospital mortality rate for patients with DM and CS of about 60%. OBJECTIVES: This study compares the 1-year mortality rates of patients with DM and those without (NDM) and evaluates early revascularization (ERV) compared with initial medical stabilization (IMS) in patients with DM and CS. Methods: Baseline characteristics, clinical and hemodynamic measures, and management were compared for 90 patients (31%) with DM and 198 with NDM (69%) who were randomized to ERV or IMS in the SHOCK Trial. RESULTS: When compared with NDM, patients with DM were of similar age but had higher rates of prior MI (44.4 vs. 27.8%, p = 0.007) and hypertension (56.2 vs. 42.5%, p = 0.04). The DM group had a lower rate of fibrinolytic therapy (44.4 vs. 60.1%, p = 0.02). In patients randomized to ERV, patients with DM had a higher rate of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (50.0 vs. 30.9%, p = 0.03) despite similar rates of triple-vessel disease. The 1-year mortality rates in both groups were equivalent (58.9%). One-year mortality was not associated with diabetes (hazard ratio [HR] 1.02, 95% CI, 0.73-1.42, p = 0.91). The benefit of an ERV strategy was similar (HR [DM] 0.62; HR [NDM] 0.75, p = 0.58). Even after adjusting for the imbalance in CABG rates, 1-year mortality was not associated with DM. CONCLUSION: Diabetes mellitus is not a predictor of 1-year mortality in CS after AMI. The benefit from an ERV strategy is similar for DM and NDM. The management strategies and influence of DM on mortality in CS deserve further evaluation.     

Prognostic role of systemic hypertension and diabetes mellitus in patients with unstable angina undergoing coronary stenting

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The adverse effects of systemic hypertension and diabetes mellitus in coronary patients are well known, although their long-term prognostic influence on patients with unstable angina (UA) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with coronary stenting is uncertain. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of these pathologies in this population at 3-year follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We studied 279 consecutive patients with UA who underwent coronary stenting. 129 (46.2%) of them had hypertension and 60 (24.7%) had diabetes. Clinical follow-up was obtained in 92.14% after 3 years. RESULTS: Although the need for new PCI at the target lesion was higher for patients with hypertension and diabetes (12.1 vs 8.4%; p=0.31, and 14.5 vs 8.6%; p=0.16, respectively), the differences were not significant with respect to the control groups. Multivariate analysis showed hypertension (OR=4.71; CI 95%, 1.01-42.2; p=0.04) and ejection fraction (OR=0.95; CI 95%, 0.91-0.99; p=0.03) to be predictors of mortality, and diabetes to be a predictor of myocardial infarction and infarction resulting in death (OR=3.01; CI 95%, 1.13-8.02; p=0.02, and OR=2.68; CI 95%, 1.03-6.95; p=0.04, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Hypertension was the only independent long-term predictor of mortality in our series of patients with UA who underwent coronary stenting. Diabetes was the only predictor of myocardial infarction or for the combined event of infarction and death. Risk of myocardial infarction was threefold as high in this diabetic patient population, and was the main cause of mortality.     

陈旧性脑梗死对急性心肌梗死患者死亡因素的影响

目的 分析陈旧性脑梗死对急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者住院死亡的影响.方法 回顾分析首都医科大学宣武医院2002-2009年连续住院的3572例AMI患者资料.结果 3572例AMI患者中伴陈旧性脑梗死564例(15.8%),与不伴陈旧性脑梗死相比,年龄较大[(69.4±9.9)岁比(64.2±12.9)岁,P=0.000].高血压、糖尿病、陈旧性心肌梗死、非ST段抬高性心肌梗死比例较高(71.0%比57.3%,41.0%比25.7%,12.9%比9.5%,14.9%比10.7%,P＜0.01),且住院病死率较高(16.5%比10.0%,P=0.000).陈旧性脑梗死增加住院死亡(OR 1.368,P=0.022),且独立于年龄(OR 1.048),性别(OR 1.148)、糖尿病(OR 1.337)、陈旧性心肌梗死(OR 1.294)、广泛前壁心肌梗死(OR 1.888)、介入性治疗(OR 0.506)等因素.结论 陈旧性脑梗死增加AMI患者住院死亡风险.

Abstract：

Objective To investigate the impact of prior cerebral infarction (PCI) on in-hospital mortality in patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI).MethodsA retrospective analysis of documents of a total of 3572 consecutive patients with AMI admitted to Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University from 2002 Jan.1 to 2009 Dec.31 were performed.Results There were 564 patients ( 15.8% )with PCI.Compared with the group of without PC1,the group with PCI were substantially older[(69.4 ±9.9) vs (64.2 ± 12.9)years,P =0.000],and had a higher prevalence of hypertensive disease,diabetes mellitus,prior myocardial infarction (MI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction(NSTEMI)( respectively,71.0% vs 57.3%; 41.0% vs 25.7%,12.9% vs 9.5%; 14.9% vs 10.7%,P ＜ 0.01 ),and a higher in-hospital mortality ( 16.5% vs 10.0%,P= 0.000).Univariate analysis demonstrated that in-hospital mortality associated with age,gender,extensive anterior MI,anterior MI,diabetes mellitus,prior cerebral infarction,prior myocardial infarction,coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention.Logistic regression analysis found that risk factors were age,extensive anterior MI,anterior MI,diabetes mellitus and prior cerebral infarction,and protective factors were coronary angiography and percutanous coronary intervention.PCI was independently associated with in-hospital mortality,OR 1.368,95% CI 1.047-1.787,P = 0.022.Conclusion In patients with acute myocardial infarction,the presence of PCI increases the risk of worse in-hospital outcome.     

Diabetic Patients Who Present With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

BackgroundThe long-term outcomes of diabetic patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in contemporary practice have received limited study.MethodsWe evaluated the clinical characteristics and outcomes of STEMI patients with and without diabetes in a large regional STEMI program designed to facilitate timely primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (Minneapolis Heart Institute at Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN). The primary and secondary outcome measures were in-hospital mortality, 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (stroke, myocardial infarction, unplanned PCI or coronary artery bypass graft [CABG] surgery, and all-cause mortality), and 5-year mortality.ResultsOf the 6292 patients included, 1158 (18.4%) had Diabetes Mellitus (DM) (95.3% Type II, 4.7% Type I). Patients with DM were older (mean age 66 vs. 62.8 years, p < 0.01), had more co-morbidities and were more likely to receive medical therapy without reperfusion (13% vs. 10%, p = 0.003). Patients with DM had higher in-hospital (8% vs. 5%, p = 0.001), 1-year (8% vs. 4%, p < 0.001) and 5-year mortality (16% vs. 9%, p < 0.001) compared to non-diabetics. On Cox proportional hazards analysis, DM was independently associated with worse mortality (hazard ratio: 1.70, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.32–2.19, p < 0.001) and MACE [HR: 1.63 (95% (CI)): 1.28–2.08, p < 0.001].ConclusionsDespite advancements in medical therapy and revascularization strategies for STEMI, DM remains independently associated with higher short- and long-term morbidity and mortality in contemporary practice.     

糖尿病对急性ST段抬高心肌梗死急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗心肌灌注的影响

目的采用心电图ST段回落指数（STR）和冠状动脉造影心肌呈色分级（MBG）评价糖尿病对急性心肌梗死（AMI）直接PCI后心肌灌注以及患者预后影响的价值。方法287例AMI并行急诊PCI的患者依据病史以及入院前是否接受药物和非药物降糖治疗的情况分为糖尿病组（n=95例）和非糖尿病组（n=192例）。所有患者分析心电图STR和MBG,并进行临床随诊。结果与非糖尿病组比较,糖尿病组年龄较大[（65±12）岁比（57±11）岁,P〈0．05]。两组PCI术后TIMIⅢ级血流的患者数差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。糖尿病组心肌微循环灌注不良多于非糖尿病组（MBG 0／156．0％比41．1％,P=0．019）,ST段回落不全也多于非糖尿病组（43．2％比30．7％,P=0．038）。糖尿病组患者在随诊期间联合终点事件的发生率明显多于非糖尿病组（27．4％比16．1％,P=0．025）。多因素回归分析显示糖尿病是患者预后不良的独立危险因素（RR=1．83,95％CI：1．04～3．36,P=0．01）。患者接受再灌注的时间（RR=3．63,95％CI：1．27～10．42,P=0．03）、ST段回落不全（RR=11．71,95％CI：1．53～38．70,P=0．03）以及MBG0／1（RR=1．16,95％CI：1．03～1．38,P=0．01）与患者预后不良相关。结论糖尿病是AMI患者在成功接受介入治疗术后预后不良的独立危险因素,这可能与糖尿病患者出现心肌微循环灌注不良有关。     

Impact of chronic renal insufficiency on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with sirolimus-eluting stents versus bare metal stents

Patients with chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) have higher rates of target vessel revascularization and mortality. The efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) to improve the clinical outcomes of these patients is unknown. We investigated the effect of SESs versus bare metal stents (BMSs) on outcomes of patients with CRI. Among the first 1,522 patients treated with SESs, 76 were identified with CRI and 1,446 without CRI. In-hospital and 1- and 6-month clinical outcomes were compared with 153 patients with CRI who were treated with BMSs. Patients with CRI were older, hypertensive, and diabetic and had more previous myocardial infarctions, revascularizations, and decreased left ventricular function (p <0.001). These patients had more saphenous vein graft lesions, were treated with more debulking devices (p <0.003), and had higher rates of in-hospital complications and mortality (p <0.001) compared with those without CRI. Among patients with CRI, treatment with SESs did not affect clinical outcomes at 1 month and was associated with lower incidences of target vessel revascularization (7.1% vs 22.1%, p = 0.02) at 6 months but did not affect other events, including mortality (16.7% vs 14.7% p = 0.89), compared with BMSs. However, treatment with SESs in patients without CRI was associated with significantly lower rates of major adverse cardiac events at 6 months (p <0.001). In conclusion, percutaneous coronary intervention with SESs in patients with CRI is associated with low rates of repeat revascularization compared with BMSs but has no effect on mortality at 6 months.     

Impact of insulin-requiring diabetes mellitus on effectiveness of reperfusion and outcome of patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction

The relation between diabetes mellitus (DM) and outcome was assessed in a series of 1,061 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The efficacy of reperfusion was assessed by ST-segment resolution analysis. Of 1,061 patients, 166 had DM (15.6%), and 84 had insulin-requiring DM (51% of DM patients). The 6-month mortality rate was 26% in insulin-requiring DM patients, 7% in non-DM patients, and 4% in non-insulin-requiring DM patients (p <0.001). The early ST-segment resolution rate was lower in insulin-requiring DM patients (52%) compared with the other DM patients (78%) and non-DM patients (76%; p <0.001). Multivariate analysis showed insulin-requiring DM to be independently related to the risk for death (hazard ratio 1.94, 95% confidence interval 1.17 to 3.22, p = 0.009). Insulin-requiring DM is a strong predictor of mortality in patients who undergo PCI for AMI, and this relation may be explained by a less effective myocardial reperfusion despite the mechanical restoration of normal epicardial flow in most patients.     

Diabetes and coronary stent implantation: experience from a reference center in interventional cardiology

We evaluated the influence of diabetes mellitus (DM) on clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease treated with stent implantation. Between 1996 and 2000, 934 stents were implanted in 893 patients in our institution; 23% of them had DM. Clinical and angiographic characteristics and clinical outcomes of the patients with and without DM were prospectively included in a computerized database. Diabetics were older (61.5 +/- 10 vs. 59.8 +/- 11 years; p = 0.04) and had a higher prevalence of hypertension (69% vs. 62%; p = 0.09). The procedural clinical success rate (successful coronary stenting with residual stenosis < 30%, TIMI 3 flow and no in-hospital adverse clinical event) was lower in the diabetic group (88% vs. 92%; p = 0.05). In the 1-year follow up, diabetic patients showed higher rates of new target vessel revascularization (12.3% vs. 8%; p = 0.06), death (5.4% vs. 2.5%; p = 0.03) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, new angioplasty, surgery, acute myocardial infarction or death: 16.3% vs. 9.3%; p = 0.003). Diabetes was independently associated to 1-year MACE on multivariate analysis (OR: 2.00; IC: 1.25-3.24; = 0.004). We concluded that DM is associated with higher complication and restenosis rates and a higher risk of long-term major cardiovascular events in patients treated with coronary stent implantation.