The patterns and distribution of residual abnormalities between the individual proximal venous segments after an acute deep vein thrombosis

INTRODUCTION: The subsequent course of residual abnormalities after an acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) can vary within individual venous segments. To investigate the pattern of response within the individual venous segment, we used sequential duplex scanning to determine whether certain segments are more likely to recanalize or remain occluded. METHODS: The anatomic segments involved in 63 above-knee DVTs were examined with duplex scanning at 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year after the acute event. The segments under investigation were the external iliac vein (EIV), common femoral vein (CFV), superficial femoral vein (SFV), and popliteal vein (PV). Reflux studies were performed at each follow-up examination. During the follow-up period the segments were examined to see whether they were occluded, partially recanalized, or totally recanalized and the development of reflux was noted. RESULTS: Most DVTs were multisegmental with a total number of 171 sites involved. Initially, a greater number of segments were occluded (71%) than partially thrombosed (29%). The occluded segments were predominantly in the SFV and PV. At 1 year the thrombi had fully resolved in 60% of the venous segments, 27% remained partially recanalized, and 13% were occluded. The venous segments that resolved within the first 6 months had a higher rate of valvular competence than those that resolved from 6 months to 1 year. The SFV and PV had a higher incidence of valvular incompetence than the EIV and CFV. All venous segments that were partially recanalized at 1 year were found to have significant reflux. The SFV had the highest incidence of total occlusion at the end of 1 year (36%). Many of the occluded SFVs had established collateral pathways that displayed no evidence of reflux. CONCLUSION: The lower extremity venous segments differ in respect to their tendencies to partially or fully recanalize or remain occluded. All partially recanalized segments displayed reflux. Fully resolved segments that recanalized within the first 6 months were more likely to have competent valves than those that recanalized after 6 months. In the presence of an occluded SFV, collateral pathways establish rapidly. No reflux was found in these collaterals.     

Clinical presentation and venous severity scoring of patients with extended deep axial venous reflux

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and profile of patients presenting with chronic venous insufficiency (class C3-C6) and cascading deep venous reflux involving femoral, popliteal, and crural veins to the ankle. METHODS: From September 2001 to April 2004, 2,894 patients were referred to our center for possible venous disorders. The superficial, deep, and perforator veins of both legs were investigated with color duplex scanning. The criterion for inclusion in this study was the existence of cascading deep venous reflux involving the femoral, popliteal, and crural veins to the ankle whose duration had to be longer than 1 second for the femoropopliteal vein and longer than 0.5 seconds for the crural vein. The advanced CEAP classification, the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), the Venous Segmental Disease Score (reflux; VSDS), and the Venous Disability Score (VDS) were used. RESULTS: Seventy-one limbs in 60 patients were identified. Eleven limbs (15.5%) were classified as C3, 36 (50.7%) as C4, 21 (29.6%) as C5, and 3 (4.2%) as C6. A primary etiology was identified in 11 (15.5%) limbs, and a postthrombotic etiology was identified in 60 limbs (84.5%). In the latter group, all but four patients were aware that they had had a previous deep venous thrombosis. In addition to femoropopliteal and calf veins, reflux was present in the common femoral vein in 60 (84.5%), the deep femoral vein in 27 (38%), and the muscular calf veins in 62 (87.3%). Incompetent perforator veins were identified in 53 (74.6%) limbs. Fifty-one (71.8%) limbs had a combination of superficial venous insufficiency (AS(2), AS(2,3), AS(4), or their combination) previously treated or present. Of these, 11 had primary etiology alone, and 40 had a secondary etiology with or without primary disease. Means and 95% confidence intervals of the VCSS, VSDS, and VDS were 9.72 (8.91-10.53), 7.2 (6.97-7.42), and 1.08 (0.83-1.32), respectively. A significant increase in the VCSS and in the VSDS (P < .0001) paralleled the CEAP clinical class. The VDS was higher in the C3 and C6 classes but did not reach significance. There was a significant link between the pain magnitude in the VCSS and the VDS (P < .0001). Severity of pain and high VDS did not depend on the wearing of elastic compression stockings. VCSS increased significantly according to the presence of an incompetent perforator vein (P < .05) and/or reflux in the deep femoral vein (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the value of the Venous Severity Score as an instrument for evaluation of chronic venous insufficiency. A significant increase in the VCSS and VSDS paralleled CEAP clinical class; VDS was higher in classes C3 and C6 without reaching significance, probably because of the small size of the samples. Some clinical and anatomic features need to be clarified to facilitate scoring.     

Valvular incompetence in superficial, deep and perforator veins of limbs with varicose veins

Venous valvular incompetence was investigated with Doppler technique in 296 limbs with untreated primary varicose veins. Partial or complete insufficiency of the long saphenous vein was found in 95%. Six patterns of incompetence of this vein could be distinguished. Insufficiency of the short saphenous vein was present in 15% of the limbs and perforator incompetence in 45%. Femoral and/or popliteal vein reflux was found in 20% of the limbs. In eight limbs (2.7%) with verified primary deep venous insufficiency there was a moderate or severe degree of femoral and popliteal venous reflux. Skin changes secondary to the venous disease were present in 18% of the limbs, mainly those with incompetence of perforator and long saphenous veins. Doppler investigation of varicose limbs give valuable information and can be recommended as a standard pre-treatment test.     

Valvular reflux after deep vein thrombosis: incidence and time of occurrence.

From December 1986 to December 1990, 268 patients with acute deep vein thrombosis were studied in our laboratory. From this group 107 patients (123 legs with deep vein thrombosis) were placed in our long-term follow-up program. The documentation of valvular reflux and its site was demonstrated by duplex scanning. The duplex studies were done at intervals of 1 and 7 days, 1 month, every 3 months for the first year, and then yearly thereafter. The mean follow-up time for these patients was 341 days. In addition, reflux was evaluated in 502 patients with negative duplex study results and no previous history of deep vein thrombosis or chronic venous insufficiency. In the patients with acute deep vein thrombosis, valvular incompetence was noted in 17 limbs (14%) at the time of the initial study. Reflux was absent in 106 limbs (86%). In this last group reflux developed in 17% of the limbs by day 7. By the end of the first month, 37% demonstrated reflux. By the end of the first year, more than two thirds of the involved limbs had developed valvular incompetence. The distribution of reflux at the end of the first year of follow-up was the following: (1) popliteal vein, 58%; (2) superficial femoral vein, 37%; (3) greater saphenous vein, 25%; and (4) posterior tibial vein, 18%. Reflux seems to be more frequent in the segments previously affected with deep vein thrombosis. Among cases where segments were initially affected with thrombi, after 1 year the incidence of reflux was 53%, 44%, 59%, and 33% for the common femoral vein, superficial femoral, popliteal vein, and posterior tibial vein, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Significance of popliteal reflux in relation to ambulatory venous pressure and ulceration.

Fifty-one patients (55 limbs) who had had deep venous thrombosis (DVT) extending into the femoral or iliofemoral segment three to five years earlier and ten limbs of ten healthy volunteers were studied. The ambulatory venous pressure (AVP) was measured by inserting a needle in a vein on the foot; the presence of reflux in the popliteal vein was determined by a directional Doppler ultrasonic blood velocity detector. All patients had ascending venography. The results suggest that the most important factor in determining the AVP and ulceration in postthrombotic limbs is the condition of the popliteal valves. Ulceration does not occur even in the presence of occlusion if the popliteal valves are competent. The extent of DVT and recanalization or the failure of recanalization is of secondary importance.     

Femoral venous reflux abolished by greater saphenous vein stripping

Preoperative venous duplex scanning has revealed unexpected deep venous incompetence in patients with apparently only varicose veins. Acting on the hypothesis that the deep vein reflux was secondary to deep vein dilation caused by reflux volume, the following was done. Between July 1990 and April 1993, 29 limbs in 21 patients (16 females) were examined by color-flow duplex imaging to determine valve closure by the method of van Bemmelen. Instrumentation included high-resolution ATL-9 venous interrogation using a pneumatic cuff deflation stimulus of reflux in the standing, nonweight-bearing limb. All limbs showed greater saphenous vein reflux. Twenty-nine showed superficial femoral vein reflux and of these three showed popliteal vein reflux. Duplex testing was performed by a certified vascular technologist whose interpretation was blinded as to the results of clinical examination and grading of the severity of venous insufficiency. Surgery was performed on an outpatient basis under general anesthesia using groin-to-knee removal of the greater saphenous vein by the vein inversion technique of Van Der Strict. Stab avulsion of varicose tributary veins was accomplished during the same period of anesthesia. In 27 of 29 limbs with preoperative femoral reflux, that reflux was abolished by greater saphenous stripping. In patients with popliteal reflux both femoral and popliteal reflux was abolished. Improvement of deep venous hemodynamics by ablation of superficial reflux supports the reflux circuit theory of venous overload. Furthermore, preoperative evaluation of venous hemodynamics by duplex scanning appears to provide useful pre- and postoperative information regarding venous insufficiency in individual patients.Presented at the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Southern California Vascular Surgical Society, Coronado, Calif, September 17–19, 1993.     

Venous reflux in patients with previous deep venous thrombosis: Correlation with ulceration and other symptoms

Purpose: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in many cases leads to chronic symptoms in the damaged leg, even though the affected veins have recanalized. The major hemodynamic defect in such recanalized veins is reflux. The incidence and extent of reflux has been studied in patients with proven DVT and correlated with concurrent symptoms.Methods: Two hundred seventeen limbs in 183 patients were examined by duplex scanning from January 1989 to October 1992. All limbs had previous DVT diagnosed by venography. Sites and extent (proximal, distal, or both) of reflux were identified by meticulous duplex scanning of the whole venous system and correlated with presenting symptoms.Results: The patients were classified into nine groups on the basis of the classification of the system involved (superficial, deep, or superficial and deep) and whether the reflux was found proximal or distal to the knee or both. Eighty-one limbs belong to chronic venous insufficiency class 1, 92 belong to class 2, and 38 belong to class 3. Reflux was confined to the deep venous system in 84 limbs (38.7%), to the superficial system in 31 (14.3%) limbs, and to both systems in 102 (47%) limbs. It was confined to proximal veins only in 48 (22.1%) limbs, distal only in 56 (25.8%) limbs and throughout the limb in 113 (52.1%) limbs. The incidence of swelling was increased by distal or a combination of proximal and distal reflux regardless of which system was involved. In limbs with superficial venous insufficiency (SVI) or deep venous insufficiency (DVI) only, the incidence of skin changes was not affected by the extent of reflux. However, in limbs with combined SVI and DVI, it was increased in the presence of reflux throughout the limb. Absence of distal reflux was associated with a low incidence of skin changes even in the presence of DVI. Ulceration increased with an increased extent of reflux in the presence of SVI. Absence of superficial reflux was associated with a low incidence, even in the presence of DVI.Conclusions: The data suggest that as far as the skin changes and ulceration are concerned, distal reflux and reflux in the superficial veins are more harmful than reflux confined to the deep veins, even when such reflux extends throughout the deep venous system. (J V ASC S URG 1994;20:20-6.)     

Prevalence of deep venous reflux in patients with primary superficial vein incompetence

PURPOSE: This prospective study was designed to determine the prevalence of deep reflux and the conditions under which it may occur in patients with primary superficial venous reflux and absence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). METHODS: We studied 152 limbs in 120 consecutive patients in the standing position who had superficial venous reflux with color flow duplex scanning. Limbs with documented evidence of DVT or post-thrombotic vein wall changes during the examination were studied but not included in the analysis. Limbs were divided into those that had at least reflux in the saphenofemoral, the saphenopopliteal, or the gastropopliteal junction and into those with nonjunctional reflux in the superficial and gastrocnemial veins. Peak velocity and duration of reflux were measured. To examine the recirculation theory, we tested the deep veins by occluding and refluxing saphenous veins 10 cm below the sampling site. RESULTS: Thirteen limbs in 11 patients (9%) were excluded because of previous DVT. Of the remaining 139 limbs, 106 (76%) had junctional reflux. Saphenofemoral junction was involved in 89 limbs (84%), saphenopopliteal junction in 18 (17%), and gastropopliteal junction in 7 (4%). In 33 limbs (24%), reflux was detected in the main trunk or tributaries of the saphenous veins alone with no junctional incompetence. Femoral or popliteal reflux was present in 31 limbs (22%). This reflux was segmental in 27 limbs, and it was limited in the junction in 24 limbs. The mean duration of deep venous reflux was 0.9 seconds, it ranged from 0.6 to 3.7 seconds, and it was significantly shorter than that in the superficial veins (2.6 seconds; P <.0001). In the absence of junctional reflux, the prevalence of deep venous insufficiency (DVI) was significantly lower compared with that in limbs with junctional involvement (2 of 33 vs 29 of 106; P =.038). The mean duration of deep venous reflux in these groups was comparable (0.85 seconds vs 0. 91 seconds; P =.44). Occlusion of the incompetent superficial veins reduced somewhat the duration of the deep venous reflux but did not abolish it (0.88 seconds vs 0.82 seconds; P =.072). The presence of DVI was associated with junctional reflux of high peak velocity and long duration. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of DVI in patients with primary superficial venous reflux and without history of DVT is 22%. However, this reflux is segmental, mainly in the common femoral vein, and is of short duration. It is associated with the presence of junctional incompetence that has a high peak velocity and long duration. These findings may explain why surgical correction of superficial reflux abolishes DVI.     

Prospective study of duplex scanning for venous reflux: Comparison of Valsalva and pneumatic cuff techniques in the reverse Trendelenburg and standing positions

Purpose: To achieve uniform testing of venous reflux between institutions, comparable methods of testing by duplex scanning are desired. This study directly examines differences of testing by two techniques, Valsalva and rapid cuff deflation, performed in two positions: 15-degree reverse Trendelenburg (RT-15) and standing.Methods: Duplex examination of 22 extremities in 19 patients with moderate to severe, class 2 and 3 chronic venous insufficiency symptoms were compared with duplex scanning of 21 limbs in 11 normal, healthy volunteers. Duration of retrograde flow and peak velocity were measured in 247 venous segments. All extremities were studied in four ways: RT-15 Valsalva, standing Valsalva, RT-15 cuff, and standing cuff. Reflux was defined as duration of retrograde flow or reflux time greater than 0.5 seconds. Six venous segments were examined: common femoral, superficial femoral, deep femoral, and greater saphenous in the upper thigh, popliteal, and posterior tibial (at the ankle).Results: The results of testing the Valsalva technique and the cuff in both the RT-15 and standing non-weight bearing positions indicate that the Valsalva method is best performed in the RT-15 position as opposed to standing, whereas the cuff technique is more effective in the standing position. In symptomatic limbs, the RT-15 Valsalva method showed similar proportion of reflux in the upper thigh when compared with the standing cuff method: common femoral (90% vs 67%), superficial femoral (81% vs 71%), greater saphenous (88% vs 59%), and deep femoral veins (30% vs 15%). In the popliteal vein the standing cuff test showed similar proportion of reflux (77%) as compared with the RT-15 Valsalva test (68%); however, a case-by-case analysis identified a large amount of variability between techniques, and inconsistencies could not be used to identify one technique as better than the other. Examination of the posterior tibial veins by all methods produced inconsistencies and a low yield of reflux in symptomatic limbs. In the common femoral vein, RT-15 Valsalva testing produced reflux times of up to 1.5 seconds in normal limbs, and represented "physiologic reflux." There was no recognizable effect of iliac vein valves on testing distal venous segments by Valsalva maneuver.Conclusions: Reflux in the upper thigh veins — common femoral, superficial femoral, deep femoral, and greater saphenous — is similarly demonstrated in both normal and symptomatic states by cuff deflation and RT-15 Valsalva techniques. In the popliteal vein, discrepancies between these two techniques are identified in patients with chronic venous insufficiency, and tibial vein reflux is not well demonstrated by either technique. Further investigation is needed to determine ideal techniques for identifying popliteal and tibial vein reflux. (J VASC SURG 1994;20:711-20.)     

Definition of venous reflux in lower-extremity veins

PURPOSE: This prospective study was designed to determine the upper limits of normal for duration and maximum velocity of retrograde flow (RF) in lower extremity veins. METHODS: Eighty limbs in 40 healthy subjects and 60 limbs in 45 patients with chronic venous disease were examined with duplex scanning in the standing and supine positions. Each limb was assessed for reflux at 16 venous sites, including the common femoral, deep femoral, and proximal and distal femoral veins; proximal and distal popliteal veins; gastrocnemial vein; anterior and posterior tibial veins; peroneal vein; greater saphenous vein, at the saphenofemoral junction, thigh, upper calf, and lower calf; and lesser saphenous vein, at the saphenopopliteal junction and mid-calf. Perforator veins along the course of these veins were also assessed. In the healthy volunteers, 1553 vein segments were assessed, including 480 superficial vein segments, 800 deep vein segments, and 273 perforator vein segments; and in the patients, 1272 vein segments were assessed, including 360 superficial vein segments, 600 deep vein segments, and 312 perforator vein segments. Detection and measurement of reflux were performed at duplex scanning. Standard pneumatic cuff compression pressure was used to elicit reflux. Duration of RF and peak vein velocity were measured immediately after release of compression. RESULTS: Duration of RF in the superficial veins ranged from 0 to 2400 ms (mean, 210 ms), and was less than 500 ms in 96.7% of these veins. In the perforator veins, regardless of location, outward flow ranged from 0 to 760 ms (mean, 170 ms), and was less than 350 ms in 97% of these veins. In the deep veins, RF ranged from 0 to 2600 ms. Mean RF in the deep femoral veins and calf veins was 190 ms, and was less than 500 ms in 97.6% of these veins. In the femoropopliteal veins, mean RF was 390 ms, and ranged from 510 to 2600 ms in 21 of 400 segments; however, RF was less than 990 ms in 99% of these veins. Duration of RF was significantly longer in all three veins systems in patients (P <.0001 for all comparisons). With a cutoff value of more than 1000 ms rather than more than 500 ms, prevalence of abnormal RF in the femoropopliteal veins was significantly reduced, from 29% to 18% (P =.002). Thirty-seven vein segments (2.4%) had RF greater than 500 ms in the supine position, compared with less than 500 ms in 22 of these vein segments (59%) in the standing position. Of the 48 vein segments (3.1%) with RF greater than 500 ms in the standing position, RF was less than 500 ms in 6 of these vein segments (13%) in the supine position. Similar observations were noted in patient veins. There was no association between RF and peak vein velocity. Peak vein velocity had no significance in determining reflux. CONCLUSIONS: The cutoff value for reflux in the superficial and deep calf veins is greater than 500 ms. However, the reflux cutoff value for the femoropopliteal veins should be greater than 1000 ms. Outward flow in the perforating veins should be considered abnormal at greater than 350 ms. Reflux testing should be performed with the patient standing.     

The postthrombotic syndrome in relation to venous hemodynamics, as measured by means of duplex scanning and strain-gauge plethysmography

PURPOSE: Venous hemodynamics were evaluated in relation to the postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) 7 to 13 years after deep venous thrombosis (DVT). METHODS: The presence of flow, reflux, and compressibility of 1394 vein segments in 82 patients was assessed by means of duplex scanning. The venous outflow resistance was measured by means of strain-gauge plethysmography. The venous hemodynamics were related to the clinical severity of the PTS, characterized by the CEAP (clinical, etiologic, anatomic, pathophysiologic) classification. RESULTS: In patients with severe clinical symptoms of PTS, the prevalence of reflux was significantly higher. There was no relationship between the severity of the PTS and the noncompressibility or the combination of reflux and noncompressibility or an increased venous resistance. By means of multiple regression analysis with the variables of age, gender, reflux, and venous resistance, age and reflux were shown to be the main contributors to the severity of PTS. Significantly more patients (64%) with severe signs of PTS had a combination of deep and superficial reflux. In each of the traceable vein segments, the mean of the CEAP classification was calculated for the vein segments with and without reflux. In the proximal superficial femoral vein (P <.001), distal superficial femoral vein (P <.05), and popliteal vein (P <.05), a significantly higher mean CEAP classification was found in the veins with reflux, whereas in the distal, long, and short saphenous veins, no such relationship was found. CONCLUSION: Most patients with severe PTS had a combination of deep and superficial reflux. Reflux in the deep proximal veins contributes significantly to the PTS.     

The natural history of calf vein thrombosis: Lysis of thrombi and development of reflux

Purpose: Although the fact is well accepted that deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of the iliac, femoral, and popliteal veins can lead to the post-thrombotic (postphlebitic) syndrome, the significance of isolated calf DVT on the development of late venous sequelae and physiologic calf dysfunction is unknown. The purpose of this study was to review the outcome of 58 limbs with isolated calf DVT and report the clinical, physiologic, and imaging results up to 6 years after the onset of DVT. Methods: The study consisted of 58 limbs of 54 patients in whom isolated calf vein DVT was diagnosed between 1990 and 1995. Proximal propagation of clot, lysis of thrombi, and development of symptomatic pulmonary emboli were examined. Of the patients, 28 received anticoagulation therapy, and 26 did not, but they had follow-up with serial duplex scans. At late follow-up 1 to 6 years later (median, 3 years), 23 patients were examined for the post-thrombotic syndrome, and all 23 underwent clinical examination, color-flow duplex scanning, and air plethysmography. Results: Proximal propagation of DVT from the calf veins into the popliteal or thigh veins occurred in 2 of 49 cases (4%) within 2 weeks of diagnosis. No patient had clinically overt pulmonary emboli develop regardless of whether anticoagulation therapy was received or not. The most common site for calf DVT was the peroneal vein (71%). Complete lysis of calf thrombi was found in 88% of the cases by 3 months. At 3 years, 95% of the patients were either asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic, and 5% had discoloration of the limb. No ulcers occurred. By air plethysmography, physiologic abnormalities were found in 27% of the cases, which was not significantly different from normal controls. Valvular reflux by duplex scanning of the calf vein segment with DVT was found in 2 of 23 cases (9%). However, reflux in at least one venous segment not involved with DVT was found in 7 of 23 cases (30%), which was higher than, but not statistically different from, normal controls, with reflux occurring in 5 of 26 cases (19%). Conclusions: Isolated calf vein DVT leads to few early complications (ie, clot propagation, pulmonary emboli) and few adverse sequelae at 3 years. The peroneal vein is most commonly involved and should be a part of the routine screening for DVT. Lysis of clot usually occurs by 3 months. Although valvular reflux rarely is found in the affected calf vein at 3 years, reflux may be found in adjacent uninvolved veins in approximately 30% of the cases. The question of whether this will lead to future sequelae, such as ulceration, will require longer follow-up. (J Vasc Surg 1998;28:67-74.)     

Incidence of deep vein thrombosis after varicose vein surgery

BACKGROUND: Varicose vein surgery is generally considered to have little risk of postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT). This prospective study examined the incidence of DVT in patients undergoing varicose vein surgery. METHODS: Lower leg veins were assessed before operation by duplex ultrasonography in 377 patients, and reassessed 2-4 weeks after surgery, and again at 6 and 12 months. Patients were instructed to contact a physician if symptoms consistent with DVT occurred before the scheduled follow-up appointment. Preoperative prophylaxis (a single dose of subcutaneous heparin) was left to the discretion of the vascular surgeon. RESULTS: DVT was detected in 20 (5.3 per cent) of the 377 patients. Of these, only eight were symptomatic and no patient developed symptoms consistent with pulmonary embolus. Eighteen of the 20 DVTs were confined to the calf veins. Subcutaneous heparin did not alter the outcome. No propagation of thrombus was observed and half of the DVTs had resolved without deep venous reflux at 1 year. CONCLUSION: The incidence of DVT following varicose vein surgery was higher than previously thought, but these DVTs had minimal short- or long-term clinical significance.     

Pattern and distribution of thrombi in acute venous thrombosis.

The location and extent of thrombosis in the deep venous system will determine immediate and long-term outcome. During the past 3 years, we have studied by duplex scanning 833 patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis. In this group, 209 patients (25%) had a positive study. The findings relative to location and extent of involvement are as follows. (1) The right leg was involved in 35% of patients, the left leg in 48%. Bilateral involvement was noted in 17%. (2) The veins most frequently affected by deep vein thrombosis were as follows: superficial femoral in 74%, popliteal in 73%, common femoral in 58%, posterior tibial in 40%, deep femoral in 29%, greater saphenous in 19%, and the inferior vena cava in 2%; multisegment involvement was common. (3) Total occlusion was present in 82% of the patients with deep vein thrombosis, and partial occlusion in 18%. (4) Isolated occlusion of single veins was uncommon. (5) The proximal (above-knee) area was involved in 95% of the cases with deep vein thrombosis, and the calf in 40% of the cases. Isolated calf deep vein thrombosis was found in 6% of the cases with right leg involvement and in 3% for the left. (6) Total leg involvement (iliocaval, femoropopliteal, and calf) occurred in 10% of the patients. Our data confirm the fallibility of the clinical diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. The frequent involvement of both limbs stresses the importance of not examining just the symptomatic limb. Proximal venous thrombosis (popliteal to inferior vena cava) is much more common than isolated calf vein thrombosis as a cause for symptoms and the referral for study.     

Effect of external valvuloplasty of the deep vein in the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency of the lower extremity

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to verify the efficacy of external valvuloplasty of the femoral vein in the treatment of primary chronic venous insufficiency (PCVI). METHODS: Forty patients with PCVI of the bilateral lower extremities were enrolled at the time of surgical management. All 80 limbs were classified as CEAP C2 to C4, with moderate incompetence of the deep vein. The limbs of each patient were randomized into one of two groups according to the operative method, so that when one limb was randomized to group A, regardless of whether it was the right or left limb, the other limb was assigned to group B. In group A, external valvuloplasty of the femoral vein was combined with surgery of the superficial venous system; in group B, surgery of the superficial venous system alone was performed. The therapeutic effects between the limbs in groups A and B were compared by color duplex scanning, a color Doppler velocity profile, air plethysmography (APG), and a CEAP severity score at 1 month, 1 year, and 3 years postoperatively. RESULTS: Within each group of limbs, no significant differences were found in the average operative time within each group of limbs. The varicose veins resolved, there were no deep vein thromboses, and the wounds healed well postoperatively in all cases. Leg heaviness was relieved completely in 90% of group A limbs (36/40) and 55% of group B limbs (22/40). Venous valve competence was achieved in 100%, 98.1%, and 90.9% of group A limbs at 1 month, 1 year, and 3 years postoperatively, respectively. The amount of venous reflux, APG indices, and CEAP severity scores were not significantly different between the two groups preoperatively (P > .05). The amount of venous reflux, reflux indices, CEAP severity scores, and muscle pumping indices improved markedly in group A limbs postoperatively compared with group B limbs (P < .01); muscle pumping indices did not improve significantly in group B limbs postoperatively (P > .05). There were significant differences in the amount of venous reflux, reflux indices, and CEAP severity scores between group A and B limbs at 1 month and 1 year postoperatively (P < .01). There were significant differences in all parameters assessed between group A and B limbs 3 years postoperatively (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: External valvuloplasty of the femoral vein combined with surgical repair of the superficial venous system improved the hemodynamic status of the lower limbs, restored valvular function more effectively, and achieved better outcomes than surgical repair of the superficial venous system alone.     

Severity and location of venous valvular insufficiency: the importance of distal valve function

Venous calf pump function was evaluated with special reference to distribution and severity of deep venous reflux at different levels. A combination of ultrasonography, foot volumetry and venous plethysmography was used in 100 consecutive patients, 32 of whom were also studied with phlebography and intravenous pressure measurements. A clear relationship was found between clinical stage of chronic venous insufficiency and number of segments with reflux. Clinically important deep venous insufficiency was found particularly in patients with reflux in the distal posterior tibial veins, even in the presence of competent popliteal valves. The results demonstrated the calf pump to be functionally divided into a series of pumps, with the distal part more important than the proximal. The importance of evaluating venous valvular function at different levels for adequate assessment of venous calf pump function is emphasized.     

CDFI����֫���Ѫ˨�γ�����е�Ӧ��

目的　探讨二维彩色多普勒超声显像 (CDFI)对下肢深静脉血栓形成 (DVT)的诊断价值。方法　1998～ 2 0 0 3年对 97例下肢DVT病人进行CDFI检查 ,了解病肢深静脉的管壁、管径、血栓位置、大小、范围、静脉瓣功能及静脉血流情况。结果　 97例 (98条 )下肢DVT病例中 ,伴有下肢深静脉瓣功能不全者 6例。其中 ,中央型 2 1条 (2 1 4 2 % ) ,周围型 4 6条 (4 6 94 % ) ,全肢型 31条 (31 6 4 % )。病肢左右侧之比为 3 3:1(P <0 0 0 1)。结论　CDFI在下肢DVT方面具有特异性表现 ,可以成为下肢DVT诊断、预后判断和随访的首选方法。     

Low molecular weight heparin versus oral anticoagulants in the long-term treatment of deep venous thrombosis

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) could be equal or more effective than conventional oral anticoagulants (OAs) in the long-term treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). METHODS: One hundred fifty-eight patients with symptomatic DVT of the lower limbs confirmed by means of duplex ultrasound scan were randomized to receive 3 to 6 months' treatment with nadroparine calcium or acenocoumarol. Quantitative and qualitative duplex scan scoring systems were used to study the evolution of thrombosis in both groups at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: During the 12-month surveillance period, two (2.5%) of the 81 patients who received LMWH and seven (9%) of the 77 patients who received OAs had recurrence of venous thrombosis (not significant). In the LMWH group no cases of major bleeding were found, and four cases (5.2%) occurred in the OA group (not significant). The mortality rate was nine (11.1%) in the LMWH group and 7.8% in the OA group (not significant). The quantitative mean duplex scan score decreased in both groups during the follow-up and had statistical significance after long-term LMWH treatment on iliofemoral DVT (1, 3, 6, and 12 months), femoropopliteal DVT (1-3 months), and infrapopliteal DVT (first month). Duplex scan evaluation showed that the rate of venous recanalization significantly increased in the common femoral vein at 6 and at 12 months and during each point of follow-up in the superficial and popliteal veins in the LMWH group. Reflux was significantly less frequent in communicating veins after LMWH treatment (17.9% vs 32.2% in the OA group). The reflux rates in the superficial (22.4% in the LMWH group, 30.6% in OA group) and deep (13.4% vs 17.7%) venous system showed no significant differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The unmonitored subcutaneous administration of nadroparine in fixed daily doses was more effective than oral acenocoumarol with laboratory control adjustment in achieving recanalization of leg thrombi. With nadroparine, there was less late valvular communicating vein insufficiency, and it was at least as efficacious and safe as oral anticoagulants after long-term administration. These results suggest that LMWHs may therefore represent a real therapeutic advance in the long-term management of DVT.     

Differences in pressures of the popliteal, long saphenous, and dorsal foot veins

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship among pressures obtained simultaneously in the popliteal, long saphenous, and dorsal foot veins. METHOD: Eight limbs were studied. One limb had an isolated popliteal vein reflux, and two had moderate long saphenous vein incompetence. No perforator or short saphenous vein insufficiency was detected. Pressures and recovery times of the popliteal/tibial and long saphenous veins were obtained with cannulation at the ankle level and insertion of catheters with a pressure transducer tip. The dorsal foot vein pressure was measured with the insertion of a scalp needle (14-gauge) connected to an external transducer. During 10 toe stands, recordings were simultaneously made in the three veins at the level of the knee joint, in the middle third of the calf, and 5 to 7 cm above the ankle with all the transducers at the same level (ie, same reference point). RESULTS: In one limb the popliteal/tibial pressure increased at all calf levels, whereas pressures decreased in both saphenous and dorsal foot veins. The pressures decreased in all three systems in the remaining seven limbs. There was no statistical difference between the pressure drop in the long saphenous vein and the deep vein. However, the decrease of the dorsal foot venous pressure was significantly more marked compared with the other two veins at all levels. The recovery time was significantly increased in the long saphenous vein compared with the deep vein; recovery time was further prolonged in the dorsal foot vein. CONCLUSION: The dorsal foot, long saphenous, and popliteal/posterior tibial veins clearly exhibit different pressure waveforms in response to calf exercise. The postexercise pressure, the percentage pressure drop, and the recovery times are widely different, which indicates that the three veins behave hydraulically as separate compartments in limbs without significant venous insufficiency.     

Deep axial reflux, an important contributor to skin changes or ulcer in chronic venous disease

OBJECTIVE: We undertook this cross-sectional study to investigate the distribution of venous reflux and effect of axial reflux in superficial and deep veins and to determine the clinical value of quantifying peak reverse flow velocity and reflux time in limbs with chronic venous disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred one legs (127 with skin changes, 274 without skin changes) in 272 patients were examined with duplex ultrasound scanning, and peak reverse flow velocity and reflux time were measured. Both parameters were graded on a scale of 0 to 4. The sum of reverse flow scores was calculated from seven venous segments, three in superficial veins (great saphenous vein at saphenofemoral junction, great saphenous vein below knee, small saphenous vein) and four in deep veins (common femoral vein, femoral vein, deep femoral vein, popliteal vein). Axial reflux was defined as reflux in the great saphenous vein above and below the knee or in the femoral vein to the popliteal vein below the knee. Reflux parameters and presence or absence of axial reflux in superficial or deep veins were correlated with prevalence of skin changes or ulcer (CEAP class 4-6). RESULTS: The most common anatomic presentation was incompetence in all three systems (superficial, deep, perforator; 46%) or in superficial or perforator veins (28%). Isolated reflux in one system only was rare (15%; superficial, 28 legs; deep, 14 legs; perforator, 18 legs). Deep venous incompetence was present in 244 legs (61%). If common femoral vein reflux was excluded, prevalence of deep venous incompetence was 52%. The cause, according to findings at duplex ultrasound scanning, was primary in 302 legs (75%) and secondary in 99 legs (25%). Presence of axial deep venous reflux increased significantly with prevalence of skin changes or ulcer (C4-C6; odds ratio [OR], 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.56-4.67). Of 110 extremities with incompetent popliteal vein, 81 legs had even femoral vein reflux, with significantly more skin changes or ulcer, compared with 29 legs with popliteal reflux alone (P =.025). Legs with skin changes or ulcer had significantly higher total peak reverse flow velocity (P =.006), but the difference for total reflux time did not reach significance (P =.084) compared with legs without skin changes. In contrast, presence of axial reflux in superficial veins did not increase prevalence of skin changes (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.44-1.2). Incompetent perforator veins were observed as often in patients with no skin changes (C0-C3, 215 of 274, 78%) as in patients with skin changes (C4-C6, 106 of 127, 83%; P =.25). CONCLUSION: Continuous axial deep venous reflux is a major contributor to increased prevalence of skin changes or ulcer in patients with chronic venous disease compared with segmental deep venous reflux above or below the knee only. The total peak reverse flow velocity score is significantly higher in patients with skin changes or ulcer. It is questionable whether peak reverse flow velocity and reflux time can be used to quantify venous reflux; however, if they are used, peak reverse flow velocity seems to reflect venous malfunction more appropriately.