Factor V Leiden: a clinical review

Factor V Leiden is the most prevalent genetic thrombophilia in people of European descent. Since its discovery, much clinical information has been gathered regarding the distribution and prevalence of the genetic mutation, the mechanism of thrombophilia, and its association with clinical thromboembolic events. Although its association with venous thromboembolism is clear, the role of Factor V Leiden in other disease states is not clear. A review of the literature regarding the mechanism of hypercoagulability, genetic versus functional diagnostic tests, screening issues, relationship to arterial thromboses, pregnancy and pregnancy complications, and treatment are discussed.     

Factor V HR2 haplotype: a risk factor for venous thromboembolism in individuals with absence of Factor V Leiden

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), occurs secondary to a number of hereditary and acquired disorders of hemostasis. A recently recognized polymorphism in Factor V (FV) gene H1299R (also named HR2) has been reported to be a possible risk factor for the development of VTE. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of HR2 polymorphism in VTE in a group of Lebanese patients. Seventy-three VTE patients and 125 healthy subjects were examined for HR2. The average ages for the patients and controls were 45.0 ± 19.1 years and 35.4 ± 18.6 years, respectively. Sixty patients (82.2%) had DVT, eight patients (11%) had PE, and five patients (6.8%) had both. There was significant association between FV Leiden and VTE (p < 0.001). HR2 haplotype had a prevalence of 16.4% in patients. VTE patients with normal FV were 2.7 times more likely to have the HR2 haplotype as compared to controls with normal FV (p = 0.036, 95% CI = 1.04–7.06). We conclude that the FV HR2 haplotype significantly affects the risk of VTE in subjects with normal FV. This finding entails that screening for the HR2 haplotype should be done in VTE patients with normal FV Leiden results. No conflicts of interest. No source of funding.     

Factor V Leiden mutation is not a predisposing factor for acute coronary syndromes

BackgroundThe prevalence of Coronary artery disease (CAD) in India has increased considerably over the past few years and could become the number one killer disease if interventions are not done. Factor V Leiden (FVL) mutation and FII G20210A polymorphism are two recently described genetic factors with a propensity towards venous thrombosis. This warrants the investigations for thrombophilia in myocardial infarction patients in India.MethodsThe study cohort consisted of 51 patients aged below 50 years presenting with acute coronary syndromes. In both patient group and normal individuals the major risk factors Protein C deficiency, Protein S deficiency, anticardiolipin antibodies, Fibrinogen and Lipoprotein [a] were studied. Factor V Leiden (FVL) G1691A mutation in both control and patient group was looked by using Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by sequencing of the PCR products.ResultsOur results indicated significantly higher levels of anticardiolipin antibodies and fibrinogen in the patients and absence of FVL (G1691A) mutation in our study cohort. One of the patients (H5) showed insertion of an extra A nucleotide in exon 10 of the Factor V gene resulting in frame shift mutation in this patient.ConclusionThe results of present study showed absence of FVL mutation in our population. However, there is a need to confirm the above findings on patients from different populations from different parts of the country. The insertion of an extra A in exon 10 in the patient needs to be ascertained to confirm that it is one of its kinds or is prevalent in the population.     

Spontaneous venous thrombosis in a young patient with combined factor V Leiden and lupus anticoagulant.

We describe a case of a 28-year-old man who developed an extensive spontaneous deep venous thrombosis. Testing revealed heterozygotic factor V Leiden mutation, and the presence of both lupus anticoagulant (LA) and elevated IgM anticardiolipin antibody (ACA). Several family members were found to be heterozygous for factor V Leiden. A paternal aunt had the factor V Leiden mutation, an elevated plasma homocysteine and a borderline increased IgG ACA level. No other family member had a history of a venous thrombotic event. This case illustrates that evaluation of young patients who present with venous thrombosis should be performed for both hereditary and acquired thrombophilic defects. The family studies suggest that the presence of a lupus anticoagulant may be more clinically significant than elevated ACA in risk assessment. Although screening family members when the proband carries factor V Leiden is controversial, psychological reassurance of those who test negative and simple advice on occupations or social habits (e.g., smoking) for those who test positive may be important benefits.     

Factor V Leiden related Budd-Chiari syndrome

BACKGROUND: The role of factor V Leiden as a cause of Budd-Chiari syndrome has only recently been described. AIMS: To assess the specific features of factor V Leiden related Budd-Chiari syndrome. PATIENTS: Sixty three consecutive patients with hepatic vein or terminal inferior vena cava thrombosis. METHODS: Standardised chart review. RESULTS: Factor V Leiden was found in 20 patients (31% (95% CI 20-43)). In the subgroup of patients with, compared with the subgroup without, factor V Leiden, a combination of prothrombotic states was more common (70% (95% CI 50-90) v 14% (95% CI 3-24)); inferior vena cava thrombosis was more frequent (40% (95% CI 19-61) v 7% (95% CI 0-14)); and distribution of initial alanine aminotransferase values was bimodal (almost normal or extremely increased) versus unimodal (p=0.003). Factor V Leiden accounted for four of five cases of massive ischaemic necrosis (transaminases >50-fold the upper limit of normal values) (p=0.014), and also for all three cases developing during pregnancy. Patients with and without factor V Leiden did not differ with regard to mortality, portosytemic shunting, or listing for liver transplantation. Hepatocellular carcinoma developed in two patients; both had factor V Leiden and indolent obstruction of the inferior vena cava. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome, factor V Leiden (a) is common; (b) precipitates thrombosis mostly when combined with another risk factor; (c) is associated with one of two contrasting clinical pictures: indolent thrombosis-particularly of the inferior vena cava-or massive ischaemic necrosis; and (d) is a major cofactor of Budd-Chiari syndrome developing during pregnancy.     

Homozygous factor V Leiden and double heterozygosity for factor V Leiden and prothrombin mutation

The most common forms of familial thrombophilia are factor V Leiden (FVL) and prothrombin mutation (PTM). Homozygous FVL and PTM have long been feared conditions thought to cause high rates of morbidity and mortality. To analyse clinical features in patients with homozygous FVL and PTM, as well as patients with double heterozygosity for FVL and PTM. All patients with homozygous FVL, PTM or double heterozygosity in the MATS database of 1465 consecutive unselected patients were analysed regarding age at inclusion venous thromboembolism (VTE), age at first thrombosis, recurrence, clinical course and acquired risk factors. We found 36 patients homozygous for FVL. Patients homozygous for FVL were younger than controls at group level (56 ± 18 vs. 63 ± 17, p < 0.02). Homozygous women were younger than female controls (50 ± 19 vs. 63 ± 18, p < 0.002). No difference was observed when comparing male subjects. Women were younger than men at inclusion thrombosis (50 ± 19 vs. 65 ± 14, p < 0.02) and at first thrombosis (47 ± 19 vs. 64 ± 14, p < 0.01). Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) was seen in 33 patients (92 %), 6 (17 %) had pulmonary embolism (PE) and 3 (8 %) had combined DVT and PE. PE was less frequent in homozygous FVL women compared to female controls (p < 0.03). VTE recurred in 3 subjects during the duration of the study. Odds ratio for VTE in homozygous FVL patients compared to controls was 13.9 (95 % CI 9.9–19.7). We found no subjects with homozygous PTM. Double heterozygosity for FVL and PTM was seen in 12 subjects. There was no difference in age at inclusion VTE between double heterozygotes and controls (59 ± 16 vs. 63 ± 17, ns.). DVT was seen in 92 % at inclusion, 8 % had PE. Mean age at first VTE was 52 ± 17 (27–82). Consecutive homozygous FVL patients had a higher age at first thrombosis than previously described. Homozygous females are affected at an earlier age than homozygous men and female controls. It seems that thrombi in homozygous FVL have a different pattern compared to controls i.e. more prone for thrombosis in the lower extremity. The odds ratio for thrombosis among homozygous FVL seems to be lower than previously described.     

Coagulation factor V: a plethora of anticoagulant molecules

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Thrombin is necessary for survival and is produced after activation of prothrombin by prothrombinase at the site of a vascular injury. While the enzyme component of prothrombinase alone, factor Xa, bound to a membrane surface can activate prothrombin, incorporation of the cofactor molecule, factor Va, into prothrombinase results in a five orders of magnitude increase in the catalytic efficiency of factor Xa that provides the physiologic pathway for thrombin generation. While the kinetic constants and the identity of peptide bonds cleaved in prothrombin to generate alpha-thrombin have been long established, the peptidyl portions of the factor Va molecule responsible for its interactions with factor Xa, prothrombin, and the lipid surface are still the subject of intense investigation. In this review, we summarize the current state of knowledge with respect to the interactions of the factor Va molecule with the various components of prothrombinase. RECENT FINDINGS: Binding sites for factor Xa have been identified on both the heavy and light chains of factor Va. Two amino acid regions that interact with factor Xa have been delineated on the heavy chain of the cofactor. It has also been demonstrated that the carboxyl-terminal portion of the heavy chain of factor Va contains hirudin-like motifs and appears to be responsible for the interaction of factor Va with prothrombin. This region of the molecule is important for procofactor activation by thrombin as well as cofactor function. Finally, the membrane-binding site of factor Va is contributed by several elements of the light chain and involves both electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions. SUMMARY: The absence or dysfunction of factor Va leads to hemorrhagic diseases while prolonged existence of the active cofactor species is associated with thrombosis. Thus, modulation of the incorporation of factor Va into prothrombinase in vivo by using synthetic peptides that have the potential to impair factor Va binding to any of the components of prothrombinase, will allow for control of the rate of thrombin generation at the site of vascular damage. As a consequence, a systematic definition of the regions of factor Va governing its incorporation within prothrombinase will provide the scaffold for the synthesis of potent anticoagulant molecules that could modulate thrombin formation and suppress excessive clotting in thrombotic individuals.     

Factor V Leiden and the Slovak population

The resistance to activated protein C (APC-resistance) based on the presence of factor V Leiden (F V Leiden) is the most frequent thrombophilic condition in the white race population. It contributes to the origin of thrombosis especially in the venous part of blood vessels. Significant geographic differences have been detected within Europe. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the frequency in the occurrence of F V Leiden: 1. in healthy (asymptomatic) Slovak population, 2. in their consanguineously unrelated members with thrombosis and 3. in patients with myocardial infarction (IM) without or with other known risk factors of this disease (nicotinism, obesity, hypertension, dyslipoproteinemia, diabetes mellitus), respectively. The detection of FV Leiden was made by molecular biology methods. The occurrence in a group of 152 healthy individuals was four % (6 persons) and this frequency corresponds to the geographic localization of the Slovak Republic in Europe. In a group of 349 patients with thrombosis in anamnesis, FV Leiden was detected in 103 persons (29.5%). The occurrence was higher than the usually reported incidence in these patients (20%). Likewise, in a group of 35 patients with IM without risk factors in anamnesis, the occurrence of FV Leiden (8.6%) was significantly higher in comparison with healthy population and the incidence further increased significantly in a group of 41 patients with IM and the presence of at least one risk factor (14.6%). The authors therefore suppose an active role of the Leiden mutation of FV gene in the pathogenesis of this disease.     

Factor V Leiden mutation in Sneddon syndrome

Sneddon syndrome (SNS) is characterized by the association of ischaemic cerebrovascular events and widespread livedo racemosa. Its pathophysiology is still controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of factor V Leiden mutation in consecutive patients referred for SNS according to antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) status. Fifty-three Caucasian patients were enrolled from 1996 to 2001. Diagnosis of SNS was based on the presence of a widespread livedo racemosa and at least one clinical neurologic ischaemic event. The following investigations were performed: detection of antithrombin III, protein C and protein S deficiency, lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin and anti-beta2 glycoprotein I antibodies, biologic false-positive test for syphilis, and factor V Leiden mutation by direct genomic analysis. Fisher's test and t-test were used for statistics. Detection of aPL on multiple determinations was negative in 31 patients (group 1) and positive in 22 patients (group 2). Factor V Leiden mutation was detected in six patients (11.3%), heterozygous in all. The frequency of this mutation was statistically higher in group 1 (6/31, 19.3%) than in group 2 (0/22; P = 0.035). Within aPL-negative SNS, the comparison of patients with versus without factor V Leiden mutation showed no difference for clinical data or familial history of thrombosis. A high prevalence of heterozygous factor V mutation was found in aPL-negative patients with SNS. This finding adds further arguments to consider SNS as a heterogeneous entity.