High factor VIII levels contribute to the thrombotic risk in families with factor V Leiden

Factor V Leiden (FVL)-carrying relatives of selected patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) have much higher venous thrombotic risks than FVL-carrying relatives of unselected consecutive patients with VTE. To find an explanation for this, we explored other risk factors of VTE, in particular the presence of high factor VIII levels, in a retrospective follow-up study. We assessed levels of factor VIII, factor IX, fibrinogen, protein C, protein S, antithrombin, the presence of prothrombin 20210A, and the occurrence of VTE in 61 first-degree relatives of 12 selected thrombophilic families harbouring FVL, and 183 first-degree relatives of 47 unselected families of FVL carriers with a first VTE. In all families, FVL appeared to be an independent risk factor for VTE. Higher thrombosis incidence rates were found in carriers of both FVL and high factor VIII levels (> or = 150 IU/dl), while high levels of factor VIII appeared to be an independent thrombotic risk factor only in selected thrombophilic families. The fraction of individuals with more than one prothrombotic coagulation disorder was 10% higher in selected families. These results and the higher thrombotic risks we found in the thrombophilic families favour the hypothesis that other unknown co-existing genetic defects contribute to thrombophilia.     

The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism among heterozygous carriers of factor V Leiden or prothrombin G20210A mutation. A systematic review of prospective studies

Factor V Leiden (FVL) and prothrombin G20210A mutation (PTM) are the two most common genetic polymorphisms known to predispose to a first episode of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, whether these thrombophilic abnormalities are also risk factors for recurrent VTE is unclear. We conducted a systematic review of prospective studies to assess the risk of recurrent VTE associated with heterozygous carriage of each of these mutations. All randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies that reported the incidence of recurrent VTE in patients with and without FVL and PTM after discontinuation of anticoagulant treatment were collected and analyzed. The risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for recurrent VTE were calculated in heterozygous carriers of FVL or PTM and compared to those of non-carriers. Eleven studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Recurrent VTE occurred in 114 out of 557 heterozygous carriers of FVL (20.5%) as compared to 382 out of 2,646 non-carriers (14.4%); and in 38 out of 212 heterozygous carriers of PTM (17.9%) compared to 428 of 2,996 non-carriers (14.3%). The RR of VTE recurrence conferred by the heterozygous carriage of FVL and PTM was 1.39 (95% CI, range 1.15 to 1.67) and 1.20 (range 0.89 to 1.61), respectively, using the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effects model; 1.45 (1.13 to 1.85) and 1.36 (1.02 to 1.82), respectively, using the Der Simonian and Laird random effects method. In symptomatic patients with VTE, heterozygous carriage of FVL is clearly associated with a definitely increased risk of recurrent thromboembolism. The risk is lower with PTM and is difficult to interpret since it varies according to the assessment method used.     

FV Leiden mutation and risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in Serbian population

The absolute rate of recurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is approximately 5% per year. There is a lower rate of recurrence in provoked VTE, and higher in idiopathic one. So far, there is no consensus whether hereditary thrombophilia should be considered as a persistent risk factor, and whether it requires long-term anticoagulant therapy. The aim of our study was to estimate the risk of recurrent VTE in patients carrying FV Leiden mutation in Serbian population.In retrospective study (1994-2006), we have evaluated the risk of recurrent VTE in 56 patients who are carriers of FV Leiden mutation, in comparison to group consisting of 56 patients non-carriers of FV Leiden mutation. Patients with FII G20210A and MTHFR C677T mutations, antiphospholipid antibodies, antithrombin III, protein C or protein S deficiency, malignancies and diabetes were excluded from the study.Recurrent VTE occurred in 44.6% of the patients, carriers of the FV Leiden mutations, vs. 26.7% in non-carriers group (P<0.05). The incidence rate was 3.7 and 2.2% per year, respectively. The estimated relative risk of recurrence for FV Leiden carriers was 1.67 (95% CI 0.99-2.81, P=0.049). The 60% of patients with mutation and only 13% without mutation develop rethrombosis during first year after discontinuance of therapy (P<0.01).In our study patients with symptomatic VTE who are carriers of the FV Leiden gene mutations have a higher risk of recurrent VTE than non-carriers. Our data suggest the importance of the FV Leiden mutation detection and the estimation of the clinical condition for successful secondary prophylaxis of VTE.     

The risk of venous thromboembolism in family members with mutations in the genes of factor V or prothrombin or both

Factor V Leiden and the G20210A mutation in the prothrombin gene are the most frequent abnormalities associated with venous thromboembolism. It is unknown whether the risks due to the presence of either mutation are of the same magnitude. We compared the prevalence and incidence rate of venous thromboembolism in relatives with either mutation or both. The finding of different rates might influence the strategies for primary prevention of thrombosis in carriers of these mutations. The study population included 1076 relatives of probands with the prothrombin gene mutation, factor V Leiden or both who underwent screening for inherited thrombophilia and were found to be carriers of single mutations or double mutations or who were non-carriers. The prevalence of venous thromboembolism was 5.7% in relatives with the prothrombin gene mutation, 7.8% in those with factor V Leiden, 17.1% in those with both mutations and 2.5% in non-carriers. Annual incidences of thrombosis were 0.13% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06-0.24], 0.19% (0.13-0.25), 0.42% (0.15-0.83) and 0.066% (0.03-0.11), respectively, and the relative risk of thrombosis was two times higher in carriers of the prothrombin gene mutation, three times higher in those with factor V Leiden and six times higher in double carriers than in non-carriers. The incidence of venous thromboembolism in carriers of the prothrombin gene mutation is slightly lower than that observed in carriers of factor V Leiden, whereas in carriers of both mutations it is two or three times higher. These findings suggest that lifelong primary anticoagulant prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism is not needed in asymptomatic carriers of single or double mutations. Anticoagulant prophylaxis seems to be indicated only when transient risk factors for thrombosis coexist with mutations.     

Risk of thrombosis associated with oral contraceptives of women from 97 families with inherited thrombophilia: high risk of thrombosis in carriers of the G20210A mutation of the prothrombin gene

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Oral contraceptives (OC) and inherited thrombophilia are well-known risk factors associated with venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, there are only few studies on the risk of VTE in women with inherited thrombophilia who use oral contraceptives. DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective family cohort study of 325 women belonging to 97 families with inherited thrombophilia, including antithrombin, protein S and C deficiencies, the factor V Leiden mutation (FVL) and the G20210A mutation of the prothrombin gene (PT20210A) to determine the risk of VTE associated with OC intake. RESULTS: For carriers of the PT20210A mutation, the risk of VTE in OC users was 3-fold higher (95% CI 1.3-6.8) than that in non-carriers. Carriers of FVL mutation taking OC showed an OR of 1.4 (95% CI 0.6-3.3), indicating a tendency to increase the risk of VTE. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Because of the high prevalence of the PT20210A (6.5%) and FVL (2%) mutations in the general Spanish population and the increased risk of VTE associated with OC intake, genetic screening for these mutations should be considered in potential OC users belonging to families with thrombophilia.     

Different risk of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in carriers with factor V Leiden compared with non-carriers, but not in other thrombophilic defects. Results from a large retrospective family cohort study

The term factor V Leiden (FVL) paradox is used to describe the different risk of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism that has been found in carriers of FVL. In a thrombophilic family-cohort, we estimated differences in absolute risks of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism for various thrombophilic defects. Of 2,054 relatives, 1,131 were female, 41 had pulmonary embolism and 126 deep vein thrombosis. Annual incidence for deep vein thrombosis in non-carriers of FVL was 0.19% (95%CI, 0.16–0.23), and 0.41% (95%CI, 0.28–0.58) in carriers; relative risk (RR) 2.1 (95%CI, 1.4–3.2). For pulmonary embolism these incidences were similar in carriers and non-carriers 0.07%, respectively; RR 1.0 (95% CI, 0.4–2.5). When co-inheritance of other thrombophilic defects was excluded the RR for deep vein thrombosis in FVL carriers was 7.0 (95%CI, 2.3–21.7) compared to non-carriers and 2.8 (95%CI, 0.5–14.4) for pulmonary embolism. For other thrombophilic defects no such effect was observed. Thus the FVL paradox was confirmed in our study. However, a similar paradox in carriers of other thrombophilic defects was not observed.     

A prospective study of asymptomatic carriers of the factor V Leiden mutation to determine the incidence of venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND: The factor V Leiden mutation is a common genetic defect associated with an increased risk for venous thromboembolism. The clinical implications for asymptomatic carriers of this mutation and, consequently, the usefulness of screening families in which a proband has both the mutation and venous thromboembolism are unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of venous thromboembolism in asymptomatic carriers of the factor V Leiden mutation. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: University hospitals in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 470 asymptomatic carriers of the factor V Leiden mutation (234 men, 236 women; mean age, 43 years [range, 15 to 88 years]), 12 of whom were homozygous. Carriers were identified by screening the first-degree relatives (>15 years of age) of 247 symptomatic probands. MEASUREMENTS: Objectively diagnosed episodes of venous thromboembolism and the relationship between incidence and exposure to high-risk situations. RESULTS: Nine venous thromboembolic events were observed in 1564 observation-years, resulting in an annual incidence of 0.58% (95% CI, 0.26% to 1.10%). The incidence of spontaneous venous thromboembolism was 0.26% (CI, 0.07% to 0.65%) per year; 3.5% (CI, 0.1% to 17.8%) per episode of surgery, trauma, or immobilization; 0.0% (CI, 0.0% to 19.5%) per pregnancy; 1.8% (CI, 0.4% to 5.2%) per year of oral contraceptive use; and 2.9% (CI, 0.8% to 15.3%) per year of use of hormone replacement therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The absolute annual incidence of spontaneous venous thromboembolism in asymptomatic carriers of the factor V Leiden mutation is low and does not justify routine screening of the families of symptomatic patients.     

Factor V Leiden mutation and the risk of venous thromboembolism in pregnant women.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In this retrospective, single center, cohort study we assessed the risk of pregnancy-related venous thromboembolism (VTE) in women belonging to a large number of families identified because of a symptomatic proband with single identified factor V Leiden mutation. DESIGN AND METHODS: Female family members who had experienced at least one full-term pregnancy were enrolled in the study. Two hundred and seventy pregnancies occurred in 105 carriers and 215 pregnancies in 81 non-carriers of factor V Leiden mutation. RESULTS: The frequency of VTE was 6.4% for heterozygous, 16.7% for homozygous, 20% for double heterozygous carriers of thrombophilic defects, and 1.2% for non-carriers. The majority of VTE events related to pregnancy occurred in the post-partum period. The relative risks of developing pregnancy-related VTE in women who were carriers of heterozygous and homozygous (or combined heterozygous) factor V Leiden mutation as compared to non-carriers were 5.3 (95% CI, 0.6 to 43.9) and 15.4 (95% CI, 1.4 to 164), respectively. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Factor V Leiden mutation is a risk factor for pregnancy-related VTE, especially in its homozygous form and in combination with other thrombophilic abnormalities. Screening of families with this mutation might be useful for women of fertile age, as they may take advantage from thromboprophylaxis during pregnancy and the post-partum period.     

Factor XIII Val34Leu and the risk of venous thromboembolism in factor V Leiden carriers

A mutation in factor XIII (Val34Leu) was reported to protect against venous thromboembolism. We evaluated the effect of Val34Leu on thrombotic risk in 352 factor V Leiden carriers who were first-degree relatives of 132 thrombotic propositi carrying factor V Leiden. The total observation period was 2,594 years in 92 Val34Leu carriers and 7,444 years in 260 non-carriers. The annual incidence of a first episode of venous thromboembolism was 0.31% in Val34Leu carriers and 0.44% in non-carriers [relative risk (RR) for venous thromboembolism: 0.7, 95% CI 0.3-1.5]. Age-specific RR for venous thromboembolism were (for Val34Leu carriers and non-carriers respectively): 1.0 (95% CI 0.3-3.2) in the age group of 15-30 years, 0.4 (95%, CI 0.05-3.0) in the age group of 30-45 years, 0.6 (95% CI 0.1-2.9) in the group aged 45-60 years and 0.5 (95% CI 0.06-4.5) in relatives older than 60 years. In conclusion, the impact of FXIII Val34Leu on the venous thromboembolic risk is modest, suggesting that screening for this mutation in factor V Leiden carriers is not justified.     

Pseudohomozygosity for activated protein C resistance is a risk factor for venous thrombosis

Pseudohomozygosity for activated protein C resistance (APC-r) is a rare condition due to the association of heterozygous FV Leiden mutation and partial type I FV deficiency. To assess the risk of venous thromboembolism in these subjects, seven families including 11 pseudohomozygotes and 45 relatives were examined. Among the relatives, 16 were heterozygous FV Leiden carriers, nine showed partial FV deficiency and 20 no abnormalities. Deep vein thrombosis occurred in 4/11 (36.3%) pseudohomozygous patients versus 6/16 (37. 4%) FV Leiden carriers and 1/20 (5%) normal relatives. Pseudohomozygotes and FV Leiden carriers had a significantly increased risk of venous thrombosis in comparison to normal relatives (RR 8.8 and 5.7, respectively). There was no difference between the thrombotic risk of pseudohomozygous subjects and of FV Leiden carriers (RR 1.6, 95% CI 0.43-5.7). Furthermore, there was no difference in thrombosis-free survival between pseudohomozygotes and 45 consecutive FV Leiden heterozygous outpatients, suggesting that a referral bias may explain the apparent younger age of thrombosis in the pseudohomozygotes in comparison to relatives with FV Leiden heterozygosity (27 years v 54 years; P = 0.01). Pseudohomozygosity for APC resistance carries a significantly higher risk for venous thromboembolism in comparison to normal subjects, but probably not in comparison to heterozygous FV Leiden carriers.     

Thrombin generation profile in non-thrombotic factor V Leiden carriers

Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis - Factor V Leiden (FVL) mutation is the most common genetic risk factor for venous thromboembolism. In families with a history of thrombosis, FVL can be...     

Incidence of venous thromboembolism in asymptomatic family members who are carriers of factor V Leiden: a prospective cohort study

In a prospective cohort study, we assessed the incidence of spontaneous and risk period-related venous thromboembolism (VTE) in asymptomatic family members of patients who experienced VTE and had the factor V Leiden mutation. In all, 561 family members of 131 probands were included, 313 of whom were carriers (299 heterozygous and 14 homozygous) and 248 of whom were noncarriers of the factor V Leiden mutation. Average follow-up was 4 years (range, 4 months-6 years). There were 1255 and 984 observation-years of follow-up in carriers and noncarriers, respectively. Eight episodes of VTE occurred in heterozygous carriers, resulting in an annual incidence of 0.67% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29-1.33). Two events occurred in the absence of associated risk factors, determining an annual incidence of spontaneous VTE of 0.17% (95% CI, 0.02-0.6). Only one VTE (risk period-related) occurred in noncarriers, with an annual incidence of 0.1% (95% CI, 0.003-0.56). Relative risk for VTE in heterozygous carriers compared with noncarriers of the factor V Leiden mutation was 6.6 (95% CI, 1.1-39.8). Risk period-related VTE occurred with an incidence of 18% and 5% per risk period in heterozygous carriers and in noncarriers, respectively. Thus, the low rate of VTE in asymptomatic family members carrying the mutation did not justify continuous anticoagulant prophylaxis. Screening families of symptomatic probands with the factor V Leiden mutation has the potential to identify those asymptomatic carriers who might benefit from thromboprophylaxis during risk periods.     

Prothrombin 20210A mutation: a mild risk factor for venous thromboembolism but not for arterial thrombotic disease and pregnancy-related complications in a family study

BACKGROUND: The prothrombin 20210A mutation has been associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Its relationship with arterial disease and pregnancy-related complications is, however, still uncertain. The aim of this study was to estimate the incidences of first venous and arterial thrombotic events and pregnancy-related complications in relatives of patients with the mutation. METHODS: After clinical classification, the presence of the mutation was determined in first-degree relatives of consecutive patients with the mutation and a history of VTE or premature atherosclerosis. Relatives with and without the mutation were compared. RESULTS: Of all relatives, 204 (50%) were heterozygous, 5 were homozygous, and 198 had a normal genotype. The annual incidence of a first episode of VTE was 0.35% and 0.18% in carriers and noncarriers, respectively (odds ratio [OR], 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9-4.1); the annual incidence of a first arterial thrombosis was 0.22% and 0.15% in carriers and noncarriers, respectively (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 0.8-6.3). The annual incidence of a first myocardial infarction was 0.14% (95% CI, 0.05%-0.23%) and 0.05% (0.01%-0.14%) in carriers and noncarriers, respectively (OR, 4.7; 95% CI, 1.0-22.5; P =.06). In particular, homozygous carriers were at increased risk of VTE (OR, 6.0; 95% CI, 1.3-27.2), whereas a history of VTE in the proband influenced the risk of VTE in the relatives. Women with the mutation did not experience significantly more pregnancy-related complications than their relatives with a normal genotype. CONCLUSIONS: The prothrombin mutation is a mild risk factor for VTE within families of carriers but does not seem to play an important role in arterial thrombotic disease, with the exception of myocardial infarction, or in pregnancy-related complications.     

Gene-gene and gene-environment interactions determine risk of thrombosis in families with inherited antithrombin deficiency.

To analyze inherited antithrombin deficiency as a risk factor for venous thromboembolism in various conditions with regard to the presence or absence of additional genetic or acquired risk factors, we compared 48 antithrombin-deficient individuals with 44 nondeficient individuals of 14 selected families with inherited antithrombin deficiency. The incidence of venous thromboembolism for antithrombin deficient individuals was 20 times higher than among nondeficient individuals (1.1% v 0.05% per year). At the age of 50 years, greater than 50% of antithrombin-deficient individuals had experienced thrombosis compared with 5% of nondeficient individuals. Additional genetic risk factors, Factor V Leiden and PT20210A, were found in more than half of these selected families. The effect of exposure to 2 genetic defects was a 5-fold increased incidence (4.6% per year; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9% to 11.1%). Acquired risk factors were often present, determining the onset of thrombosis. The incidence among those with exposure to antithrombin deficiency and an acquired risk factor was increased 20-fold (20.3% per year; 95% CI, 12.0% to 34.3%). In conclusion, in these thrombophilia families, the genetic and environmental factors interact to bring about venous thrombosis. Inherited antithrombin deficiency proves to be a prominent risk factor for venous thromboembolism. The increased risks among those with exposure to acquired risk factors should be considered and adequate prophylactic anticoagulant therapy in high-risk situations seems indicated in selected families with inherited antithrombin deficiency.     

Thrombophilic risk of individuals with rare compound factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A polymorphisms: an international case series of 100 individuals

The risk of thrombosis in individuals with rare compound thrombophilias, homozygous factor V Leiden (FVL) plus heterozygous prothrombin G20210A (PTM), homozygous PTM plus heterozygous FVL, and homozygous FVL plus homozygous PTM, is unknown. We identified, worldwide, individuals with these compound thrombophilias, predominantly through mailing members of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Physicians were sent a clinical questionnaire. Confirmatory copies of the genetic results were obtained. One hundred individuals were enrolled; 58% were female. Seventy‐one individuals had a venous thrombosis (includes superficial and deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism), 4 had an arterial thrombosis and 6 had both. Nineteen individuals had never had a thrombotic event. Thrombosis‐free survival curves demonstrated that 50% of individuals had experienced a thrombotic event by 35 yrs of age, while 50% had a first venous thromboembolic event (VTE; includes all venous thrombosis except superficial thrombosis) by 41 yrs of age; 38.2% of first VTEs were unprovoked. 37% of patients had at least one VTE recurrence. Seventy percent of first pregnancies carried to term and not treated with anticoagulation were thrombosis‐free. In conclusion, patients with these rare compound thrombophilias are not exceedingly thrombogenic, even though they have a substantial risk for VTE.     

Genetic polymorphisms associated with acute pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis.

Frequently an inherited predisposition to thrombosis remains clinically silent until an additional environmental factor intervenes. The present study aimed to assess distribution of inherited risk factors of venous thrombosis in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). The prevalences of factor V Leiden (FV Leiden), prothrombin factor II G20210A (FII G20210A), C677T and A1298C of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) mutations were studied in 149 VTE patients and 100 controls. The following key risks were established: previous deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (23.5%), bed rest (34.2%), immobilisation of lower limb (10.1%), hospitalisation (30.9%) and obesity (28.9%). In 29 (19%) patients and in three (3%) controls FV Leiden was found. A significant association between VTE and FV Leiden was established. There were six (4%) carriers of the FII G20210A among VTE patients and one in the controls. No associations between VTE and MTHFR polymorphisms (C677T, A1298C) were found. In three of 149 patients both FV Leiden and FII G20210A polymorphisms were observed. The mean protein C activity was slightly, though nonsignificantly, smaller in VTE patients. In conclusion, there was a positive association between venous thromboembolism and factor V Leiden. Only a weak trend favouring a relationship between prothrombin factor II G20210A and venous thrombolism was present. No associations between common polymorphisms of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase and venous thromboembolism were found.     

Additional genetic risk factors for venous thromboembolismin carriers of the factor V Leiden mutation

Only a minority of subjects with factor V (FV) Leiden mutation develop venous thromboembolism (VTE), suggesting that additional genetic risk factors may be present in symptomatic carriers. We screened 157 unrelated carriers of the FV Leiden mutation with a first episode of VTE and 291 unrelated asymptomatic FV carriers for the presence of two frequent mutations, i.e. G20210A of the prothrombin gene and C677T of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene. Carriers with other inherited or acquired thrombophilia-associated abnormalities were excluded from analysis. Heterozygotes for the G20210A mutation were more prevalent among symptomatic carriers than in asymptomatic carriers (10.8% v 2.7%, P  < 0.0001); homozygotes for the C677T mutation were also more prevalent in symptomatic carriers (21.6% v 14.4%, P  = 0.05). Factor V Leiden carriers who had had a VTE episode during oral contraceptive intake were more frequently carriers of the G20210A mutation (14.3%, P  = 0.03). These results further support the idea that VTE in carriers of FV Leiden results from interaction with additional genetic or circumstantial risk factors, and that an accurate search for such factors is required to identify carriers at risk.     

Risk of venous thromboembolism in carriers of factor V Leiden with a concomitant inherited thrombophilic defect: a retrospective analysis.

Factor V Leiden is the most common genetic defect associated with venous thromboembolism. Its clinical expression is limited and shows a wide intrafamilial and interfamilial variation, which might be explained by the influence of other genetic risk factors. We retrospectively studied 226 patients with factor V Leiden and documented venous thromboembolism (probands) and 400 first-degree carrier relatives to assess the contribution of concomitant genetic risk factors to the occurrence of venous thromboembolism. The prothrombin G20210A mutation was found in 8.3%, homozygosity of factor V Leiden in 7.2%, and inherited deficiencies of antithrombin, protein C or protein S in 4.7% of symptomatic carriers (probands and relatives), as compared with 6.0, 3.4 and 0.9% of asymptomatic carriers, respectively. The total follow-up time in relatives was 11 049 years. Prevalences of venous thromboembolism were 10.8% in single heterozygous factor V Leiden carrier relatives, 16.0% in double-heterozygotes for factor V Leiden and the prothrombin mutation, 36.8% in homozygotes for factor V Leiden, and 40.0% in double-heterozygotes for factor V Leiden and an inherited deficiency of protein C or protein S. Annual incidences in these groups were 0.39, 0.57, 1.41, and 4.76%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed a small, non-significant additional effect of the prothrombin mutation on the risk of venous thromboembolism in heterozygotes for factor V Leiden [adjusted hazard ratio, 1.3; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.5-3.8]. This effect was more pronounced for homozygosity of factor V Leiden (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.7-9.0) and inherited protein C or protein S deficiencies (adjusted hazard ratio, 17.5; 95% CI, 3.8-81.2). Our data provide evidence of clustering of the evaluated genetic thrombophilic defects in symptomatic factor V Leiden carriers and support the assumption that the clinical expression of factor V Leiden depends on clustering in a part of carriers.     

The A20210 allele in the prothrombin gene enhances the risk of venous thrombosis in carriers of inherited protein S deficiency.

Sixteen families with inherited protein S deficiency and venous thromboembolism (VT) were screened for the presence of factor V (FV) Leiden mutation and for the G20210A allele in the prothrombin gene. While FV Leiden was not detected in any of the families, protein S deficiency and prothrombin mutation were present in five families. To assess the risk of VT in carriers of the combined defects, a total of 92 members of the 16 families, including propositi, were examined. Thirty subjects were normal, 40 showed protein S deficiency, 10 the prothrombin mutation and 12 showed both abnormalities. When index cases were excluded, thrombosis history were present in 40.7% of protein S-deficient patients, 75% of patients with combined abnormality, one out of the 10 (10%) with prothrombin mutation and only one (3.3%) of the normal subjects. Relatives with combined defects showed the highest incidence rate of VT in comparison with normal relatives (rate ratio = 32.4), those with protein S deficiency an intermediate degree (rate ratio = 15.7), and G20210A relatives the lowest (rate ratio = 3.4). Relatives with combined defects had an increased risk of VT in comparison with relatives with protein S deficiency (incidence rate ratio 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 0.7-5.41; P = 0.1). In conclusion, the presence of the prothrombin mutation seems to increase the risk of VT carriers of protein S deficiency, although additional families are required to fully estimate the magnitude of risk.     

The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in heterozygous carriers of factor V Leiden and a first spontaneous venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND: Factor V (FV) Leiden is a risk factor for venous thrombosis (VT). Data on its influence on the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) are controversial owing to different study designs and patient cohorts. METHODS: We reevaluated the risk of recurrence among heterozygous carriers and noncarriers of FV Leiden with a first spontaneous proximal VT of the leg and/or pulmonary embolism. Patients with secondary VTE, homozygous FV Leiden, natural inhibitor deficiencies, lupus anticoagulant, cancer, or long-term anticoagulation were excluded. The study end point was objectively documented, symptomatic, recurrent VTE. RESULTS: After discontinuation of oral anticoagulant therapy for a first VTE, we prospectively observed 287 patients, 83 (29%) of whom were heterozygous for FV Leiden. Recurrent VTE was seen in 17 (20%) of 83 patients with and 44 (21.6%) of 204 without FV Leiden. The probability of recurrence among heterozygotes was 12% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8%-16%), 27% (95% CI, 21%-33%), and 27% (95% CI, 21%-33%) after 2, 4, and 6 years, respectively, and was not higher than that among patients without the mutation (16%, 23%, and 34%, respectively). The relative risk of recurrence in heterozygotes was 0.9 (95% CI, 0.5-1.6; P =.60) after adjustment for confounding variables. The risk of recurrence among patients with and without FV Leiden was not different when sex distribution or duration of anticoagulation therapy was taken into account. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of recurrence is similar among carriers and noncarriers of FV Leiden. Heterozygous patients should receive secondary thromboprophylaxis for a similar length of time as patients without FV Leiden.