首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.

Objectives:

To evaluate the shielding effect of thyroid collar for digital panoramic radiography.

Methods:

4 machines [Orthopantomograph® OP200 (Instrumentarium Dental, Tuusula, Finland), Orthophos CD (Sirona Dental Systems GmbH, Bensheim, Germany), Orthophos XG Plus (Sirona Dental Systems GmbH) and ProMax® (Planmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland)] were used in this study. Average tissue-absorbed doses were measured using thermoluminescent dosemeter chips in an anthropomorphic phantom. Effective organ and total effective doses were derived according to the International Commission of Radiological Protection 2007 recommendations. The shielding effect of one collar in front and two collars both in front and at the back of the neck was measured.

Results:

The effective organ doses of the thyroid gland obtained from the 4 panoramic machines were 1.12 μSv for OP200, 2.71 μSv for Orthophos CD, 2.18 μSv for Orthophos XG plus and 2.20 μSv for ProMax, when no thyroid collar was used. When 1 collar was used in front of the neck, the effective organ doses of the thyroid gland were 1.01 μSv (9.8% reduction), 2.45 μSv (9.6% reduction), 1.76 μSv (19.3% reduction) and 1.70 μSv (22.7% reduction), respectively. Significant differences in dose reduction were found for Orthophos XG Plus and ProMax. When two collars were used, the effective organ doses of the thyroid gland were also significantly reduced for the two machines Orthophos XG Plus and ProMax. The same trend was observed in the total effective doses for the four machines.

Conclusions:

Wearing a thyroid collar was helpful when the direct digital panoramic imaging systems were in use, whereas for the indirect digital panoramic imaging systems, the thyroid collar did not have an extra protective effect on the thyroid gland and whole body.  相似文献   

2.
骨盆数字化X射线摄影曝光剂量的优化研究   总被引:12,自引:2,他引:12       下载免费PDF全文
目的研究直接数字化X射线摄影照射剂量与成像质量的关系,确定骨盆X射线摄影的最佳摄影条件。方法以对比度一细节体模CDRAD2.0在不同照射剂量下所获取的影像的图像质量因子IQF,进行ANOVA及SNK统计学分析,确定最佳照射条件。应用X射线摄影模拟人拍摄骨盆X射线影像,按照欧共体(CEC)图像质量标准验证最佳摄影条件与常规摄影条件下照射剂量与成像质量的差别。结果不同照射剂量条件下,对比度一细节体模影像质量因子IQF有显著性差别(P=0.0001),照射剂量大于0.61mGy时,不同剂量组间IQF差异无统计学意义。对以最佳照射条件和常规照射条件所拍摄的X射线摄影模拟人影像按照CEC标准评判,两者影像质量的差异无统计学意义。结论直接数字化X射线摄影时通过增大照射剂量可以提高影像质量,但是当曝光剂量达到足够大时,再增大曝光剂量并不能显著改善图像质量,影像质量与曝光剂量间存在一个优化剂量。标准体模骨盆X射线摄影的优化剂量为0.61mGy。  相似文献   

3.
Digital luminescent radiography (DLR) is a new form of digital radiographic technology which can be used as an alternative to conventional radiologic systems; it replaces conventional screen-film systems by photostimulable phosphorus. Due to the linear dynamic range of photostimulable phosphorus, x-ray examinations can be performed with significantly lower radiation exposure. In this study radiation dose was reduced by about 90% using DLR for urethrocystography.  相似文献   

4.

Objectives:

The aim of this work was to estimate the doses to radiosensitive organs in the head of a young child undergoing panoramic radiography and to establish the effectiveness of a short collimator in reducing dose.

Methods:

Thermoluminescent dosemeters were used in a paediatric head phantom to simulate an examination on a 5-year-old child. The panoramic system used was an Instrumentarium OP200 D (Instrumentarium Dental, Tuusula, Finland). The collimator height options were 110 and 140 mm. Organ doses were measured using exposure programmes intended for use with adult and child size heads. The performance of the automatic exposure control (AEC) system was also assessed.

Results:

The short collimator reduced the dose to the brain and the eyes by 57% and 41%, respectively. The dose to the submandibular and sublingual glands increased by 32% and 20%, respectively, when using a programme with a narrower focal trough intended for a small jaw. The effective dose measured with the short collimator and paediatric programme was 7.7 μSv. The dose to the lens of the eye was 17 μGy. When used, the AEC system produced some asymmetry in the dose distribution across the head.

Conclusions:

Panoramic systems when used to frequently image children should have programmes specifically designed for imaging small heads. There should be a shorter collimator available and programmes that deliver a reduced exposure time and allow reduction of tube current. Programme selection should also provide flexibility for focal trough size, shape and position to match the smaller head size.  相似文献   

5.
目的 估算2017年苏州市医用数字X射线摄影(DR)和CT所致全市公众有效剂量负担。方法 利用分层随机抽样方法,通过医学影像存档与通信系统(PACS)和放射科信息系统(RIS),采集苏州市27家医疗机构2017年DR和CT诊疗频度数据。对于DR,使用剂量面积乘积测量仪测量受检者常见投照部位的剂量面积乘积(DAP),估算出有效剂量;对于CT,测量头部、胸部和腹部扫描时的加权CT剂量指数(CTDIw),结合扫描参数,估算出有效剂量。根据各部位的扫描人次和有效剂量,估算苏州市DR和CT医疗照射所致公众剂量负担。结果 DR检查中,腹部前后位、骨盆前后位、头颅侧位和后前位、胸部侧位和后前位、胸椎侧位和后前位、腰椎侧位和后前位一次检查所致受检者有效剂量分别为0.565、0.280、0.016、0.012、0.111、0.060、0.100、0.102、0.307和0.152 mSv。CT检查中,头部、胸部、腹部一次检查所致受检者有效剂量分别为1.33、5.75和7.31 mSv。2017年苏州市DR和CT医疗照射所致公众剂量为9 593.07人·Sv,人均年有效剂量为0.898 mSv。结论 CT医疗照射对公众剂量的贡献量远大于DR照射的贡献量。苏州市DR和CT医疗照射所致公众剂量负担处于高水平,需要引起相关卫生行政部门的重视。  相似文献   

6.

Objective

To compare proximal caries detection using intraoral bitewing, extraoral bitewing and panoramic radiography.

Methods

80 extracted human premolar and molar teeth with and without proximal caries were used. Intraoral radiographs were taken with Kodak Insight film (Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY) using the bitewing technique. Extraoral bitewing and panoramic images were obtained using a Planmeca Promax Digital Panoramic X-ray unit (Planmeca Inc., Helsinki, Finland). Images were evaluated by three observers twice. In total, 160 proximal surfaces were assessed. Intra- and interobserver kappa coefficients were calculated. Scores obtained from the three techniques were compared with the histological gold standard using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Az values for each image type, observer and reading were compared using z-tests, with a significance level of α = 0.05.

Results

Kappa coefficients ranged from 0.883 to 0.963 for the intraoral bitewing, from 0.715 to 0.893 for the extraoral bitewing, and from 0.659 to 0.884 for the panoramic radiography. Interobserver agreements for the first and second readings for the intraoral bitewing images were between 0.717 and 0.780, the extraoral bitewing readings were between 0.569 and 0.707, and the panoramic images were between 0.477 and 0.740. The Az values for both readings of all three observers were highest for the intraoral bitewing. Az values for the extraoral bitewing images were higher than those of the panoramic images without statistical significance (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Intraoral bitewing radiography was superior to extraoral bitewing and panoramic radiography in diagnosing proximal caries of premolar and molar teeth ex vivo. Similar intra- and interobserver coefficients were calculated for extraoral bitewing and panoramic radiography.  相似文献   

7.
目的评价直接数字X线摄影系统在胸部疾病诊断与筛查中的实用意义。方法自2005年9月以来,应用西门子FX直接数字X线摄影系统对我院门诊、急诊、住院患者及来院体检者进行了胸部检查。DR影像经激光打印机打印后,以数字化形式传入我院PACS供实时共享。DR影像显示病变的能力与常规X线平片进行了比较。结果自2005年9月应用西门子FX直接数字X线摄影系统以来,基本满足了我院门诊、急诊、住院患者胸部疾病诊断和来院体检者胸部疾病筛查的实际需要。与常规X线平片比较,DR影像能更清晰、准确地显示病灶。结论DR是诊断和筛查胸部疾病的重要影像技术,尤其与PACS联合应用是医院数字化管理的重要标志。  相似文献   

8.
目的 比较两种脊柱全景X射线成像技术对受检者产生的辐射剂量。方法 使用仿真体模进行实验,摸索出该体模在日本岛津Sonialvision safire17设备Slot scan脊柱全景成像的适宜成像条件,然后在GE Discovery XR650型DR系统上对该体模进行不同曝光条件的DR脊柱全景成像,3位有经验的放射科医生对两种成像技术的图像进行评分,选择图像质量评分均值最接近的对应成像参数为实验成像参数。将相关成像参数及X射线机信息输入PCXMC 2.0软件,计算受检者脊柱全景成像的器官吸收剂量和有效剂量。结果 Slot scan脊柱全景成像的适宜成像条件为高质量全景成像模式(HQ模式)、SID 150 cm、100 kVp和2 mAs, DR手动曝光模式脊柱全景成像相当图像质量的成像条件为SID 200 cm、100 kVp和3.2 mAs。Slot scan HQ模式、DR手动曝光模式和DR自动曝光模式脊柱全景成像的有效剂量(E)分别为(0.118 7±0.001 4)、(0.084 7±0.000 8)和(0.158 0±0.001 5) mSv,DR手动曝光模式的有效剂量明显低于其余2种模式(F=3 007.293,P<0.05);除乳腺以外,DR手动曝光模式的器官剂量均低于Slot scan HQ模式的器官剂量(P<0.05);除甲状腺、食管、肺以外,DR自动曝光模式的器官剂量均高于另外两种成像方式的器官剂量(P<0.05)。结论 两种手动全景成像技术的辐射剂量均处于较低水平,合理选择全景成像技术的曝光参数和模式可实现低剂量全景X射线成像。  相似文献   

9.
目的 了解数字摄影(DR)检查中受检者的辐射剂量水平,为数字放射摄影受检者指导水平的制定提供基础数据。方法 使用热释光剂量计TLD测量受检者不同部位、不同投照方向的入射体表剂量(ESD);使用剂量面积乘积仪测量受检者不同部位、不同投照方向的剂量面积乘积(DAP),并利用测量的DAP值,估算出有效剂量(E)。结果 同类检查中,kV和mAs的变化范围较大,不同部位DR检查中ESD、DAP和E的差别均具有统计学意义(F=33.47、24.68、43.19,P<0.05)。其中,ESD和DAP均以腰椎(LAT)最高,均数为4.62mGy/次和2.26Gy·cm2/次;E以腹部(AP)最高,均数为0.59mSv,高于腰椎(LAT)的0.31mSv。结论 DR在加强受检者放射防护最优化方面很有潜力,应尽快建立适合我国国民体质特征的数字放射摄影受检者辐射剂量的指导水平。  相似文献   

10.
This paper outlines how objective measurements of both image quality, in terms of signal-to-noise ratio, and effective dose may be used as tools to find the optimum kVp range for a digital chest radiography system. Measurements were made with Thoravision, an amorphous selenium-based digital chest X-ray system. The entrance surface dose and the effective dose to an anthropomorphic chest phantom were determined demonstrating how effective dose is related to beam quality. The image quality was measured using detective quantum efficiency, threshold contrast and a radiologist preference trial involving 100 patients. The results show that, despite the fact that the entrance surface dose decreases as the kVp increases, the effective dose, a better measure of the risk, reaches a minimum value between 90 and 110 kVp; however, the image quality decreases as the kVp increases. In this study the optimum kVp for chest radiography, using a selenium-based radiography system, is in the range 90–110 kVp. This is contrary to the 120- to 150-kVp range that is commonly used. Also, this study shows how objective measurements can be used to optimise radiographic technique without prolonged patient trials. Received: 4 November 1999 Revised: 10 May 2000 Accepted: 11 May 2000  相似文献   

11.
The image quality of dual-reading computed radiography and dose-reduced direct radiography of the chest was compared in a clinical setting. The study group consisted of 50 patients that underwent three posteroanterior chest radiographs within minutes, one image obtained with a dual read-out computed radiography system (CR; Fuji 5501) at regular dose and two images with a flat panel direct detector unit (DR; Diagnost, Philips). The DR images were obtained with the same and with 50% of the dose used for the CR images. Images were evaluated in a blinded side-by-side comparison. Eight radiologists ranked the visually perceivable difference in image quality using a three-point scale. Then, three radiologists scored the visibility of anatomic landmarks in low and high attenuation areas and image noise. Statistical analysis was based on Friedman tests and Wilcoxon rank sum tests at a significance level of P<0.05. DR was judged superior to CR for the delineation of structures in high attenuation areas of the mediastinum even when obtained with 50% less dose (P<0.001). The visibility of most pulmonary structures was judged equivalent with both techniques, regardless of acquisition dose and speed level. Scores for image noise were lower for DR compared with CR, with the exception of DR obtained at a reduced dose. Thus, in this clinical preference study, DR was equivalent or even superior to the most modern dual read-out CR, even when obtained with 50% dose. A further dose reduction does not appear to be feasible for DR without significant loss of image quality.  相似文献   

12.
The purpose of this study was to assess contrast-detail performance and effective dose of eight different digital chest radiography systems. Digital chest radiography systems from different manufacturers were included: one storage phosphor system, one selenium-coated drum system, and six direct readout systems including four thin-film transistor (TFT) systems and two charge-coupled device (CCD) systems. For measuring image quality, a contrast-detail test object was used in combination with a phantom that simulates the primary and scatter transmission through lung fields (LucAl). Six observers judged phantom images of each modality by soft-copy reading in a four-alternative-forced-choice experiment. The entrance dose was also measured, and the effective dose was calculated for an average patient. Contrast-detail curves were constructed from the observer data. The blocked two-way ANOVA test was used for statistical analysis. Significant difference in contrast-detail performance was found between the systems. Best contrast-detail performance was shown by a CCD system with slot-scan technology, and the selenium-coated drum system was compared to the other six systems (p values 0.003). Calculated effective dose varied between 0.010 mSv and 0.032 mSv. Significant differences in contrast-detail performance and effective dose levels were found between different digital chest radiography systems in clinical practice.  相似文献   

13.

Objectives:

To correlate the radiomorphometric indices obtained using digital panoramic radiography (DPR) with bone mineral densities, evaluated by the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry test, in a population of post-menopausal females to identify patients with asymptomatic low bone mineral densities.

Methods:

The morphology of the mandibular cortex was evaluated using the mandibular cortical index (MCI) and the inferior mandibular cortex width was evaluated using the mental index (MI) in 64 female patients who had undergone dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry assessment. Of these patients, 21 were diagnosed with osteopaenia and 20 with osteoporosis, and 23 were normal. Three new indices for evaluating the inferior mandibular cortex width were designed: the mental posterior index 1 (MPI1), MPI2 and MPI3. Statistical analyses were performed using the χ2 and Kruskal–Wallis tests and the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results:

There were significant differences between the normal and lower bone mineral density groups (osteopaenia and osteoporosis) for MCI (p < 0.01). In the osteoporosis group, the MI, MPI1, MPI2 and MPI3 were significantly different from the normal and osteopaenia groups (p < 0.05). The MI, MPI1, MPI2 and MPI3 showed that there is an area in the mandibular cortex, located between the mental foramen and the antegonial region, which is valid for identifying females at high risk for osteoporosis.

Conclusions:

The MCI, MI, MPI1, MPI2, and MPI3 radiomorphometric indices evaluated using DPR can be used to identify post-menopausal females with low bone densities and to provide adequate medical treatment for them.  相似文献   

14.
目的比较散射线滤除模板及常规滤线栅对数字X射线影像进行散射线校正所成影像质量与辐射剂量差异。方法 以对比度-细节体模(CDRAD 2.0)及ROC统计学体模(ALVIM TRS)为成像对象,分别使用散射线滤除模板技术和常规滤线栅技术,获取经散射线校正的体模数字X射线影像,比较两种散射线滤除方法所得的体模影像图像质量因子(IQF)和信号检出概率,分析两种方法图像质量及体模表面入射剂量差别。结果 在不同体模表面照射剂量条件下,应用散射线滤除模板技术和常规滤线栅技术,消除散射线后的数字影像其图像质量因子(IQF)和信号检出概率(Pdet)差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 数字X射线摄影时,应用散射线滤除模板技术(SFTT)可以有效滤除散射线。与滤线栅相比,相同照射条件下SFTT能够明显改善图像质量;在获得相同图像质量前提下,应用SFTT,体模表面入射剂量比使用滤线栅降低30%;SFTT为数字X射线摄影中有效滤除散射线、提高X射线图像质量、降低患者剂量的可选择方法。  相似文献   

15.
目的通过床旁数字化X线摄影(digitalradiography,DR)系统与计算机X线摄影(computedradiography,CR)系统胸部摄影图像质量的对比分析,探讨床旁DR摄影的优势。方法随机抽取2010年拍摄的DR床旁X线胸片1000份和既往CR床旁X线胸片1000份进行对比分析。结果床旁DR摄影的应用提供了更加优良的图像质量,明显减少了放射技师的工作量,同时还降低了患者接受的辐射剂量。结论床旁DR胸部摄影比CR胸部摄影有着明显的优势,对手术患者和危重患者的诊治起到了积极作用。  相似文献   

16.
Pediatric projection imaging differs from imaging of the adult patient. Children are smaller, more radiosensitive, and less compliant than their adult counterparts. Their characteristics affect the way projection imaging is practiced and how dose is optimized.Computed radiography (CR) and digital radiography (DR) have been embraced by pediatric practitioners in order to reduce dose and improve image quality. Unfortunately, dose optimization with CR and DR has been hampered by a lack of definition of appropriate exposure levels, a lack of standardization in exposure factor feedback, and a lack of understanding of the fundamentals of CR and DR technology. The potential for over-exposure exists with both CR and DR. Both the Society for Pediatric Radiology and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine recognize the promise and shortcomings of CR and DR technology and have taken steps to join with manufacturers in improving the practice of CR and DR imaging. Although the risks inherent in pediatric projection imaging with CR and DR are low, efforts to reduce dose are worthwhile, so long as diagnostic quality is maintained. Long-standing recommendations for limiting radiation dose in pediatric projection imaging are still applicable to CR and DR.  相似文献   

17.

Objectives:

Conventional panoramic radiography, a widely used radiographic examination tool in implant treatment planning, allows evaluation of the available bone height before inserting posterior mandibular implants. Image distortion and vertical magnification due to projection geometry is well described for rotational panoramic radiographs. To assess the accuracy of vertical height measurements on direct digital panoramic radiographs, implants and metal balls positioned in the posterior mandible were used as radio-opaque reference objects. The reproducibility of the measuring method was assessed by the inter- and intraobserver agreements.

Methods:

Direct digital panoramic radiographs, performed using a Kodak 8000C (Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, NY), of 17 partially edentulous patients (10 females, 7 males, mean age 65 years) were selected from an X-ray database gathered during routine clinical evaluation of implant sites. Proprietary software and a mouse-driven calliper were used to measure the radiological length of 25 implants and 18 metal reference balls, positioned in mandibular posterior segments. The distortion ratio (DR) was calculated by dividing the radiological implant length by the implant''s real length and the radiological ball height by the ball''s real height.

Results:

Mean vertical DR was 0.99 for implants and 0.97 for balls, and was unrelated to mandibular sites, side, age, gender or observer. Inter- and intraobserver agreements were acceptable for both reference objects.

Conclusions:

Vertical measurements had acceptable accuracy and reproducibility when a software-based calibrated measurement tool was used, confirming that digital panoramic radiography can be reliably utilized to determine the pre-operative implant length in premolar and molar mandibular segments.  相似文献   

18.
目的 研究数字化X射线胸部高千伏摄影曝光剂量与图像质量的关系,确定数字化X射线摄影最佳曝光剂量。方法 选择胸部高千伏摄影管电压120 kV,摄影mAs从1 mAs逐档增加至25 mAs,对模拟人体胸部厚度摄影体模与CDRAD 2.0对比度细节体模进行摄影,测量体模表面X射线入射剂量,由5位观察者独立阅读体模影像,比较任意两曝光条件组之间的图像质量因子(IQF),确定高千伏胸部摄影最佳条件。比较4和10 mAs条件下正常人体胸部摄影图像质量评分。结果 胸部高千伏摄影体模曝光条件从1 mAs增加到25 mAs,体模表面X射线入射剂量从0.067 mGy增加至1.468 mGy。随着X射线入射剂量的增加,影像质量影响因子IQF值不断减小,观察者阅读体模信号的IQF差异有统计学意义(F=31.00,P<0.05),曝光剂量条件选择在1~4 mAs时所对应的IQF均值差异有统计学意义(F=15.3,P<0.05),4~10 mAs时所对应的IQF差异无统计学意义,10~25 mAs时所对应的IQF均值差异有统计学意义(F=9.74,P<0.05)。曝光剂量条件选择4和10 mAs所对应的体模表面入射剂量为0.250和0.606 mGy,两种条件下胸部图像质量的综合评分分别为(24.8±1.64)、(25.8±2.05)分,差异无统计学意义。结论 随着数字化X射线摄影剂量的增加所获得图像信息量增加。满足临床诊断的标准人体胸部高千伏数字化X摄影最佳剂量为0.250 mGy左右。  相似文献   

19.
目的 通过对不同部位直接摄影(DR)检查的医学数字成像和传输(DICOM)文件信息中的患者剂量信息的统计,调查不同投照部位DR摄片的照射剂量分布范围,分析影响DR检查照射剂量的因素。方法 随机选取浙江省某三甲医院2009年1月至4月5160次DR摄片,包括胸部、胸椎及腰椎正、侧位、腹部前后位及骨盆正位。应用软件自动提取每例患者检查中DICOM信息文件中的剂量面积乘积(DAP),并结合照射野的范围,计算各部位DR检查的入射表面剂量(ESD)。结果 腹部前后位、腰椎侧位、胸椎正侧位的变异系数在60%以下;胸部正侧位、腰椎正位、骨盆正位的变异系数为60%~80%。各个部位的DAP最大值与最小值比值,除腹部前后位较小为3倍,其余部位差异较大。其中,腰椎正位最大差别为46倍、腰椎侧位30倍,胸椎侧位、胸部正位、侧位、骨盆正位、胸椎正位分别为23、23、18、16、11倍。通过计算得到ESD值选择75%分位点与现行普通摄片诊断参考水平(DRL)比较后发现,胸部正、侧位分别下降75%和73%;腰椎正侧位下降66%和77%;胸椎正侧位下降85%和84%;骨盆正位下降88%;腹部前后位下降88%。结论 DR检查中各个部位的DAP与ESD值存在较大变动,ESD值与现行的常规摄片的DRL相比有较大下降;有必要回顾分析DR摄片的患者照射剂量,对患者照射剂量与图像质量进行质量管理。  相似文献   

20.
目的:探讨不同附加滤过对腹部数字化X射线摄影影像质量和辐射剂量的影响。方法:回顾性分析首都医科大学附属复兴医院2020年12月至2021年1月10例行腹部X射线摄影的患者病例资料。采用自动曝光控制(AEC)技术,用获得相同mAs时的对应厚度(18 cm)的有机玻璃作为模拟腹部的衰减体。将CDRAD 2.0模体和17块1...  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号