Real-world dosimetric comparison between CyberKnife SBRT and HDR brachytherapy for the treatment of prostate cancer

PurposeHigh-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BRT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) are currently the two treatment options for definitive radiotherapy of prostate cancer, employing extreme hypofractionation. There are only very few studies comparing their dosimetry, all using computed tomography for treatment planning. We present here a real-word dosimetric comparison between SBRT and ultrasound-based virtual HDR-BRT, with both imaging modalities coming from the same patient.Methods and MaterialsPatients with prostate cancer on a prospective trial evaluating the toxicity of robotic-based SBRT were treated to a total dose of 35 Gy in 5 fractions. Fifteen patients were included in this analysis. During ultrasound-based fiducial implantation, a three-dimensional data set as in real HDR-BRT procedure was acquired. Virtual HDR-BRT plans were generated and various organs at risk and prostate dosimetric parameters were evaluated.ResultsConcerning prostate, SBRT achieved significant higher D₉₈, V₃₅ Gy, and V_37.5 Gy coverage, whereas virtual HDR-BRT achieved significant higher intratumoral doses reflected in the V₄₂ Gy and V_52.5 Gy. Rectal D_max, V₃₆ Gy, and V₂₉ Gy were significantly lower for HDR-BRT with no difference as for V₁₈ Gy. SBRT was significantly inferior regarding bladder dosimetry (D_max, V₃₆ Gy, V₁₈ Gy), whereas urethra D_max and V₄₄ Gy where significantly higher at the expense of HDR-BRT.ConclusionsHDR-BRT is superior regarding rectum and bladder dosimetry, with SBRT being superior relative to urethra dosimetry. A randomized study is warranted to define the best extreme hypofractionated modality.     

HDR brachytherapy boost using MR-only workflow for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer: 8-year results of a pilot study

PurposeTo report 8-year clinical outcome with high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRBT) boost using MRI-only workflow for intermediate (IR) and high-risk (HR) prostate cancer (PC) patients.Methods and MaterialsFifty-two patients were treated with 46–60 Gy of 3D conformal radiotherapy preceded and/or followed by a single dose of 8–10 Gy MRI-guided HDRBT. Interventions were performed in a 0.35 T MRI scanner. Trajectory planning, navigation, contouring, catheter reconstruction, and dose calculation were exclusively based on MRI images. Biochemical relapse-free- (BRFS), local relapse-free- (LRFS), distant metastasis-free- (DMFS), cancer-specific-(CCS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Late morbidity was scored using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE 4.0) combined with RTOG (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group) scale for urinary toxicity and rectal urgency (RU) determined by Yeoh.ResultsMedian follow-up time was 107 (range: 19–143) months. The 8-year actuarial rates of BRFS, LRFS, DMFS, CSS and OS were 85.7%, 97%, 97.6%, and 77.6%, respectively. There were no Gr.3 GI side effects. The 8-year actuarial rate of Gr.2 proctitis was 4%. The 8-year cumulative incidence of Gr.3 GU side effects was 8%, including two urinary stenoses (5%) and one cystitis (3%). EPIC urinary and bowel scores did not change significantly over time.ConclusionsMRI-only HDR-BT boost with moderate dose escalation provides excellent 8-year disease control with a favorable toxicity profile for IRPC and HRPC patients. Our results support the clinical importance of MRI across the BT workflow.     

LDR vs. HDR brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer: the view from radiobiological models

PURPOSE: Permanent LDR brachytherapy and temporary HDR brachytherapy are competitive techniques for clinically localized prostate radiotherapy. Although a randomized trial will likely never be conducted comparing these two forms of brachytherapy, a comparative radiobiological modeling analysis proves useful in understanding some of their intrinsic differences, several of which could be exploited to improve outcomes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Radiobiological models based upon the linear quadratic equations are presented for fractionated external beam, fractionated (192)Ir HDR brachytherapy, and (125)I and (103)Pd LDR brachytherapy. These models incorporate the dose heterogeneities present in brachytherapy based upon patient-derived dose volume histograms (DVH) as well as tumor doubling times and repair kinetics. Radiobiological parameters are normalized to correspond to three accepted clinical risk factors based upon T-stage, PSA, and Gleason score to compare models with clinical series. Tumor control probabilities (TCP) for LDR and HDR brachytherapy (as monotherapy or combined with external beam) are compared with clinical bNED survival rates. Predictions are made for dose escalation with HDR brachytherapy regimens. RESULTS: Model predictions for dose escalation with external beam agree with clinical data and validate the models and their underlying assumptions. Both LDR and HDR brachytherapy achieve superior tumor control when compared with external beam at conventional doses (<70 Gy), but similar to results from dose escalation series. LDR brachytherapy as boost achieves superior tumor control than when used as monotherapy. Stage for stage, both LDR and current HDR regimens achieve similar tumor control rates, in agreement with current clinical data. HDR monotherapy with large-dose fraction sizes might achieve superior tumor control compared with LDR, especially if prostate cancer possesses a high sensitivity to dose fractionation (i.e., if the alpha/beta ratio is low). CONCLUSIONS: Radiobiological models support the current clinical evidence for equivalent outcomes in localized prostate cancer with either LDR or HDR brachytherapy using current dose regimens. However, HDR brachytherapy dose escalation regimens might be able to achieve higher biologically effective doses of irradiation in comparison to LDR, and hence improved outcomes. This advantage over LDR would be amplified should prostate cancer possess a high sensitivity to dose fractionation (i.e., a low alpha/beta ratio) as the current evidence suggests.     

Risk factors for urethral stricture following external beam radiotherapy and HDR brachytherapy for prostate cancer

PurposeA potential late side effect of high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy combined with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is urethral stricture. The purpose of this study was to evaluate dosimetric parameters possibly contributing to stricture development, including dose to bladder base and D2cc(Gy) within 10 mm of prostatic urethra (D2cc _10 mm), which has, so far, not been reported in the literature.Methods and MaterialsPatients developing urethral stricture, and matched controls, were identified from a prospective database of those receiving 46 Gy in 23 fractions of EBRT, followed by a single 15 Gy HDR brachytherapy dose. Patients had locally advanced, high- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Brachytherapy treatment planning parameters (planning target volume (PTV) size (cm ³), V110(%) _{bladder base}, D2cc _10mm, number of HDR catheters, number of source dwell positions, and total source dwell time within 10 mm of the prostatic urethra) were analyzed to determine potential risk factors for urethral stricture.ResultsSeventy-two patients were treated, 22 of whom developed a urethral stricture. Univariate logistic regression performed on the planning parameters identified increased PTV size and D2cc _10 mm, with decreased V110(%) _{bladder base} as risk factors for stricture formation.ConclusionsIt is suggested that PTV size, V110(%) _{bladder base}, and D2cc _10mm are predictive of urethral stricture formation following EBRT and brachytherapy to the prostate. This study demonstrates the importance of minimizing high dwell times and hot spots close to organs at risk and also the correction of any craniocaudal movement of catheters to avoid potential hot spots in the bulbomembranous urethra where there may be increased dose sensitivity.     

New approach of ultra-focal brachytherapy for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer with custom-linked I-125 seeds: A feasibility study of optimal dose coverage

PurposeTo present the feasibility study of optimal dose coverage in ultra-focal brachytherapy (UFB) with multiparametric MRI for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer.Methods and MaterialsUFB provisional dose plans for small target volumes (<7 cc) were calculated on a prostate training phantom to optimize the seeds number and strength. Clinical UFB consisted in a contour-based nonrigid registration (MRI/Ultrasound) to implant a fiducial marker at the location of the tumor focus. Dosimetry was performed with iodine-125 seeds and a prescribed dose of 160 Gy. On CT scans acquired at 1 month, dose coverage of 152 Gy to the ultra-focal gross tumor volume was evaluated. Registrations between magnetic resonance and CT scans were assessed on the first 8 patients with three software solutions: VariSeed, 3D Slicer, and Mirada, and quantitative evaluations of the registrations were performed. Impact of these registrations on the initial dose matrix was performed.ResultsMean differences between simulated dose plans and extrapolated Bard nomogram for UFB volumes were 36.3% (26–56) for the total activity, 18.3% (10–30) for seed strength, and 22.5% (16–38) for number of seeds. Registration method implemented in Mirada performed significantly better than VariSeed and 3D Slicer (p = 0.0117 and p = 0.0357, respectively). For dose plan evaluation between Mirada and VariSeed, D₁₀₀% (Gy) for ultra-focal gross tumor volume had a mean difference of 28.06 Gy, mean values being still above the objective of 152 Gy. D₉₀% for the prostate had a mean difference of 1.17 Gy. For urethra and rectum, dose limits were far below the recommendations.ConclusionsThis UFB study confirmed the possibility to treat with optimal dose coverage target volumes smaller than 7 cc.     

Comparison of dose-escalated,image-guided radiotherapy vs. dose-escalated,high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost in a modern cohort of intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients

PurposeWe compared outcomes in intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients treated with dose-escalated adaptive image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) or dose-escalated high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost (HDR-B).Methods and MaterialsPatients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer by National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria were treated with either CT-based off-line adaptive IGRT (n = 734) or HDR-B (n = 282). IGRT was delivered with 3D-conformal or intensity-modulated radiation therapy with a median dose of 77.4 Gy. For HDR-B, the whole pelvis received a median 46 Gy, and the prostate 2 implants of 9.5 Gy (n = 71), 10.5 Gy (n = 155), or 11.5 Gy (n = 56).ResultsMedian followup was 3.7 years for IGRT and 8.0 years for HDR-B (p < 0.001). Eight-year biochemical control was 86% for IGRT and 91% for HDR-B (p = 0.22), disease-free survival 67% for IGRT and 79% for HDR-B (p = 0.006), and overall survival 75% for IGRT and 86% for HDR-B (p = 0.009). Cause-specific survival (8-year, 100% vs. 99%), freedom from distant metastases (98% vs. 97%), and freedom from local recurrence (98% vs. 98%) did not differ (p > 0.50 each). A worse prognosis group was defined by percent positive prostate biopsy cores >50%, perineural invasion, or stage T2b–c, encompassing 260 (35%) IGRT and 171 (61%) HDR-B patients. These patients evidenced a 5-year biochemical control of 96% for HDR-B and 87% for IGRT (p = 0.002).ConclusionsDose-escalated IGRT and HDR-B both yield excellent clinical outcomes for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Improved biochemical control with HDR-B for patients with worse pretreatment characteristics suggests that a subgroup of intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients may benefit from dual-modality treatment.     

Needle migration and dosimetric impact in high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer evaluated by repeated MRI

PurposeTo quantify needle migration and dosimetric impact in high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer and propose a threshold for needle migration.Methods and MaterialsTwenty-four high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with an HDR boost of 2 × 8.5 Gy were included. Patients received an MRI for planning (MRI1), before (MRI2), and after treatment (MRI3). Time from needle insertion to MRI3 was ∼3 hours. Needle migration was evaluated from coregistered images: MRI1-MRI2 and MRI1-MRI3. Dose volume histogram parameters from the treatment plan based on MRI1 were related to parameters based on needle positions in MRI2 or MRI3. Regression was used to model the average needle migration per implant and change in D90 clinical target volume, CTV_prostate+3mm. The model fit was used for estimating the dosimetric impact in equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions for dose levels of 6, 8.5, 10, 15, and 19 Gy.ResultsNeedle migration was on average 2.2 ± 1.8 mm SD from MRI1-MRI2 and 5.0 ± 3.0 mm SD from MRI1-MRI3. D90 CTV_prostate+3mm was robust toward average needle migration ≤3 mm, whereas for migration >3 mm D90 decreased by 4.5% per mm. A 3 mm of needle migration resulted in a decrease of 0.9, 1.7, 2.3, 4.8, and 7.6 equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions for dose levels of 6, 8.5, 10, 15, and 19 Gy, respectively.ConclusionsSubstantial needle migration in high-dose-rate brachytherapy occurs frequently in 1–3 hours following needle insertion. A 3-mm threshold of needle migration is proposed, but 2 mm may be considered for dose levels ≥15 Gy.     

Interobserver variability in rectum contouring in high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer: A multi-institutional prospective analysis

PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the interobserver variability (IOV) of rectum contouring, and its dosimetric consequences, for high-dose-rate brachytherapy in patients with prostate cancer across multiple institutions.Methods and MaterialsFive radiation oncologists contoured rectums in 10 patients on transperineal ultrasound image sets after establishing a delineation consensus. The D_0.1cc, D_1cc, and D_2cc rectum volume parameters were determined. The mean, standard deviation, and range of each dose–volume histogram parameter were evaluated for each patient. The IOV was determined using the coefficient of variation, and the dosimetric impacts on the total dose were analyzed by estimating the biologically equivalent dose (EQD_{2α/β = 3}).ResultsThe interobserver coefficients of variation (±standard deviation) for the reported D_0.1cc, D_1cc, and D_2cc were 5 ± 1.84%, 4 ± 1.26%, and 4 ± 1.33%, respectively. As for the impact on the total dose, the mean dose differences for D_0.1cc, D_1cc, and D_2cc were 10 Gy, 7.3 Gy, and 6.6 Gy, respectively.ConclusionsThe D_2cc is robust as evident by the low IOV (<5%). However, some variability ranges almost overlap with the clinical threshold level, which may present dosimetric and clinical complications. General rectal contouring guidelines for prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy are desirable to reduce discrepancies in delineation.     

A modified technique for high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy in advanced cancer of the cervix

PURPOSE: To develop a modified technique for high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy in cervical cancer stage IIIb. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Cervical carcinoma FIGO Stage III accounts for > 60% of all cervical cancers with radiation being the mainstay of treatment for most patients. After external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), the cervix is often flush with the vagina and the shape of the vagina may be conical with its apex at the external os level. All patients receive 2 applications with HDR brachytherapy. At the first application after the placement of the central tandem, only one ovoid is inserted and the other ovoid is replaced by a rubber tube, and the applicator assembly is fixed as usual. The contralateral ovoid is inserted at the subsequent application. RESULTS: To date, 21 locally advanced cervical cancer patients have been treated using this technique. In these patients, the mean dose to right and left Point A was 93% (range, 86-100%; median, 93%) and 95% (range, 90-100%; median, 95%), respectively. The variation of doses to the contralateral Point A was 1-14%. The mean dose to the rectal and bladder mucosa was 62% (range, 43-80%; median, 64%) and 80% (range, 50-110%; median, 71%), respectively. CONCLUSION: This modified HDR intracavitary technique may prove an alternative for centers where interstitial brachytherapy for cancer of the cervix is not available.     

High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy as monotherapy in one fraction of 20.5 Gy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: Toxicity and 6-year biochemical results

PurposeTo evaluate acute and late genitourinary toxicity, the gastrointestinal toxicity, and the long-term biochemical control after high-dose-rate (HDR) monotherapy in one fraction (20.5 Gy).Materials and MethodsBetween May 2011 and October 2014, 60 consecutive patients with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer were treated; the median followup was 51 months (range 30–79). All patients received one implant and one fraction of 20.5 Gy HDR real-time U/S planned with transperineal hyaluronic acid injection into the perirectal. Toxicity was reported according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Event, Version 4.0 (CTAE v4.03) by the National Cancer Institute. Biochemical failure was defined according to the “Phoenix definition”.ResultsOur experience in a single fraction of 20.5 Gy HDR brachytherapy is well-tolerated. No intraoperative or perioperative complications occurred. Grade 1 acute genitourinary toxicity occurred in 36% of patients, Grade 2 or more was not observed, only 1 patient requiring the use of a catheter for 7 days in the immediate postoperative period. No gastrointestinal toxicity was observed. No chronic toxicity has been observed after treatment. Morbidity is practically the same as that obtained with 19 Gy in our previously published article but the actuarial biochemical control was better, 82% (±3%) at 6 years.ConclusionsA single dose of 20.5 Gy resulted in a low genitourinary morbidity and no gastrointestinal toxicity and achieves good levels of biochemical disease control.     

Comparison of computed tomography with magnetic resonance imaging for imaging-based clinical target volume contours in cervical cancer brachytherapy

PurposeTo compare CT- and MRI-based brachytherapy (BT) target volumes for patients with advanced cervical cancer so as to identify those who benefit most from MRI-based planning. We also studied how the natural mobility of the organ at risks (OARs) affects the given doses.Methods and MaterialsSubjects were 60 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Stage IB–IVA cervical cancer. The CT high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) was first delineated, then the MRI HR-CTV, with volume discrepancies calculated by subtraction. The DICE coefficient (DC) of similarity was calculated from a superimposition of the volumes. Maximum doses delivered to D_2cc of OARs in CT and MRI plans were compared; the effect of time on the natural mobility was analyzed.ResultsThe mean HR-CTVs and the maximum doses given to OARs in CT- and MRI-based planes were similar. Multivariate analysis showed that deep infiltration affecting the uterine corpus and bowel loops adjacent to the cervix were the factors significantly impacting on the volume discrepancy between CT and MRI HR-CTV (p = 0.001, p = 0.045) and on the DC (p = 0.005, p = 0.028). Univariate analysis demonstrated that the FIGO stage had a significant impact on DC (p = 0.022). Patients with bowel loops adjacent to the cervix had lower body mass indices (p = 0.003). The median difference between the doses given in CT- and MRI-based plans, caused by mobility, were 0.5 Gy, 0.3 Gy, and 0.45 Gy per fraction for the rectum, bladder and sigmoid, respectively. No correlation of observed uncertainties and time between image acquisitions was detected.ConclusionsCT- or MRI-based scans at BT are adequate for OAR dose–volume histograms analysis. Cervical cancer patients with deep infiltration affecting the uterine corpus, a low body mass index with bowel loops adjacent to the cervix and an FIGO Stage III–IVA benefit most from MRI-based planning of BT.     

The American Brachytherapy Society prostate brachytherapy LDR/HDR simulation workshops: Hands-on,step-by-step training in the process of quality assurance

PurposeEducation and training on prostate brachytherapy for radiation oncology and medical physics residents in the United States is inadequate, resulting in fewer competent radiation oncology personnel to perform implants, and is a factor in the subsequent decline of an important, potentially curative cancer treatment modality for patients with cancer. The American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) leadership has recognized the need to establish a sustainable medical simulation low-dose-rate (LDR) and high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy workshop program that includes physician–physicist teams to rapidly translate knowledge to establish high-quality brachytherapy programs.MethodsThe ABS, in partnership with industry and academia, has held three radiation oncology team–based LDR/HDR workshops composed of physician–physicist teams in Chicago in 2017, in Houston in 2018, and in Denver in 2019. The predefined key metric of success is the number of attendees who returned to their respective institutions and were actively performing brachytherapy within 6 months of the prostate brachytherapy workshop.ResultsOf the 111 physician/physicist teams participating in the Chicago, Houston, and Denver prostate brachytherapy workshops, 87 (78%) were actively performing prostate brachytherapy (51 [59%] HDR and 65 [75%] LDR).ConclusionsThe ABS prostate brachytherapy LDR/HDR simulation workshop has provided a successful education and training structure for medical simulation of the critical procedural steps in quality assurance to shorten the learning curve for delivering consistently high-quality brachytherapy implants for patients with prostate cancer. An ABS initiative, intended to bend the negative slope of the brachytherapy curve, is currently underway to train 300 new competent brachytherapy teams over the next 10 years.     

An age-corrected matched-pair study of erectile function in patients treated with dose-escalated adaptive image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy vs. high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer

PurposeTo compare erectile dysfunction (ED) after adaptive dose-escalated image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT) and high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR) monotherapy.Methods and MaterialsLow- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients treated with IG-IMRT or HDR were matched on pretreatment ED, age, Gleason score, T-stage, and prostate specific antigen. Patients who received androgen deprivation therapy were excluded. ED was graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4. Actuarial rates of ED were computed by the Kaplan–Meier method.ResultsThere were 384 patients with median followup of 2.0 years (0.5–6.1) for IG-IMRT and 2.0 years (0.5–8.7) for HDR. The median IG-IMRT dose was 75.6 Gy and HDR dose 38 Gy in four fractions. For patients with no pretreatment ED, actuarial rates of requiring intervention (Grade ≥2 ED) at 3 years were 31% for IG-IMRT and 19% for HDR (p = 0.23), and impotence despite medical intervention (Grade 3) were 0% for IG-IMRT and 6% for HDR (p = 0.06). For patients with Grade 1 pretreatment ED, Grade ≥2 ED at 3 years were 47% for IG-IMRT and 34% for HDR (p = 0.79), and Grade 3 ED were 15% in both groups (p = 0.59). For patients with Grade 2 pretreatment ED, Grade 3 ED at 3 years were 22% for IG-IMRT and 37% for HDR (p = 0.70). No variables were predictive of Grade ≥2 ED following treatment.ConclusionsRates of ED requiring medical intervention for both IG-IMRT and HDR are low and equivalent. Even patients with ED before treatment are likely to maintain potency with medication use at 3 years following treatment.     

The effect of catheter displacement and anatomical variations on the dose distribution in MRI-guided focal HDR brachytherapy for prostate cancer

PurposeThe aim of this study was to analyze the effect of catheter displacement and anatomical variations of prostate and organs at risk on dose distribution in MRI-guided 19 Gy single fraction focal high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) of the prostate.Methods and MaterialsSeventeen patients with localized prostate cancer were enrolled in a prospective trial investigating focal HDR-BT in a 1.5 T MRI-HDR-BT facility. The diagnostic MRI delineations were registered with intraoperative MR scan, and a single fraction of 19 Gy was applied to the visible tumor. Self-anchoring umbrella catheters were used for HDR-BT delivery. A 1.5 T MRI was performed directly after ultrasound (US)-guided catheter placement for treatment planning. After treatment and before removal of catheters, a posttreatment 1.5 T MRI was performed. Regions of interest were also delineated on the posttreatment MR images and the catheters of 17 patients were reconstructed. The dose plan was constructed for the posttreatment MRI scan to assess the influence of catheter migration and anatomical variation on the dose delivered to the target and the organs at risk. Also on the posttreatment MRI, the complete catheter reconstruction was reassessed, to correct for, for example, bending of the catheters. The displacement of catheters between the MRI scans was determined by comparing the catheter tip positions on the treatment planning and posttreatment 1.5 T MRI scans.ResultsThe displacements of 241 catheters were investigated. Average (range) displacements of the umbrella catheters are 0.6 (0–2.9) mm in the x-direction, 0.5 (0–2.1) mm in the y-direction, and 0.9 (0–5.5) mm in the z-direction. In 3 patients, the displacement was >4 mm and up to 5.5 mm. This occurred in respectively 1/13, 1/16, and 1/18 catheters in these patients. The dosimetric differences between the intraoperative treatment and the posttreatment plans were in most patients less than 1.5 Gy. In 4 patients, a dose difference in clinical target volume D95 of >2 Gy up to 5.8 Gy was reported. No discrimination can be made between dose differences due to catheter displacement and/or organ movement/anatomy changes.ConclusionsIn general, catheter displacements were in the order of a mm and differences in dose to the clinical target volume and the organs at risk between the treatment and posttreatment plans smaller than 1.5 Gy. In some patients, dose differences up to 5.8 Gy were determined, due to either individual larger catheter displacement and/or anatomy changes. A longer followup is necessary to assess the clinical implications of individual large dose differences.     

Interfractional fluctuation of rectal dose in high dose rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer

Purpose The aim of the study was to explore the cause of the difference in the maximal rectal dose between the first and second high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy applications by comparing the thickness of the anterior rectal wall. Materials and methods The rectal dose and the thickness of the anterior rectal wall were analyzed in 26 patients with prostate cancer. After undergoing external beam radiation treatment with a total isocenter dose of 50 Gy, they were treated with HDR brachytherapy of 7.5 Gy/fraction, two fractions daily. The interval between the first HDR brachytherapy session and the second was 5 h. The rectal doses were directly surveyed during irradiation of the HDR brachytherapy. Thickening of the anterior rectal wall was measured at the same level by axial computed tomography scans obtained before the first and second HDR brachytherapy applications. Results The maximal surveyed rectal doses during the first and second HDR brachytherapy applications were 188 ± 51 cGy and 220 ± 35 cGy, respectively (P < 0.01). The fluctuation ratio exceeded 1 in each case. The thickness of the anterior rectal wall before the first and second HDR brachytherapy applications was 18.78 ± 4.34 mm and 14.95 ± 4.09 mm (P < 0.01), respectively. The fluctuation difference exceeded 0 in each case. Conclusion The different rectal dose is attributable to thinning of the anterior rectal wall. The total rectal dose is within the range of doses at risk of exerting a toxic effect on the rectum.     

Quality of life up to 10 years after external beam radiotherapy and/or brachytherapy for prostate cancer

PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate quality-of-life changes up to 10 years following three different radiotherapy concepts.Methods and MaterialsIn the years 2000–2003, 295 patients were treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT; n = 135; 70.2 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions), low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT with I-125; n = 94; 145 Gy), and high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT with Ir-192; n = 66; 18 Gy in two fractions using 4–6 needles) as a boost to EBRT (50.4 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions). Quality of life was assessed using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite at median time of 2, 6, and 10 years after treatment.ResultsThe urinary function score 2 years after EBRT (mean 93 points) was significantly higher in comparison to HDR-BT + EBRT (80 points, higher doses to the urethra relevant) and LDR-BT (88 points). After 10 years, only HDR-BT + EBRT (75 points) remained worse (LDR-BT 92 points; EBRT 91 points). Urinary incontinence score decreased from 83 to 76 points in the HDR-BT + EBRT group. No significant differences or changes resulted in the bowel domain. The mean sexual function score (i.e., sexuality score) was significantly higher after LDR-BT versus HDR-BT + EBRT and EBRT (30 vs. 19 and 24 points after 2 years and 25 vs. 13 and 15 points after 10 years, respectively)—a lower patient age and a lower percentage with hormonal treatment need to be considered.ConclusionApart from decreasing sexual function for all patients, decreasing urinary scores were found in the HDR-BT + EBRT group predominantly as a result of increasing incontinence. This study demonstrates the need for optimum BT treatment planning.