Using a surgical prostate-specific antigen threshold of >0.2 ng/mL to define biochemical failure for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with definitive radiation therapy in the ASCENDE-RT randomized control trial

PurposeTo compare biochemical failure using a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) threshold of >0.2 ng/mL to that using Phoenix threshold (nadir+2 ng/mL).Methods and MaterialsAndrogen suppression combined with elective nodal and dose-escalated radiation therapy (the ASCENDE-RT trial) is a randomized control trial in which 276 high-risk and 122 intermediate-risk patients were randomized to (1) a standard arm with 12 months of androgen deprivation therapy, pelvic external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to 46 Gy, and an EBRT boost (dose-escalated EBRT [DE-EBRT]) to 78 Gy, or (2) an experimental arm which substituted a low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy boost (LDR-PB). The primary endpoint was biochemical progression-free survival (b-PFS) using the Phoenix threshold. In this reanalysis of ASCENDE-RT, the b-PFS using phoenix is compared to the surgical PSA threshold of >0.2 ng/mL.ResultsCompared to nadir+2 ng/mL, the >0.2 ng/mL PSA threshold doubled the number of relapse events from 69 to 139. However, the increase was confined to the DE-EBRT subjects. The 7-year Kaplan-Meier b-PFS after DE-EBRT declined from 76% using nadir+2 ng/mL to 38% using the >0.2 ng/mL threshold (p < 0.001). Among the LDR-PB subset, there was no significant difference in b-PFS; the 7-year Kaplan-Meier b-PFS was 85% (>0.2 ng/mL) versus 88% (nadir+2 ng/mL) (p = 0.319).ConclusionsReplacing Phoenix with a surgical threshold greatly increased biochemical failure after DE-EBRT boost but had no effect after LDR-PB. As a result of this finding, PSA outcomes after surgery or brachytherapy can be directly compared by using the surgical definition of PSA failure. In this context, a brachytherapy boost appears to produce superior b-PFS compared to contemporary surgical series.     

Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging in high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy planning: The impact on patient-reported health-related quality of life

PurposeHigh-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy uses volumetric imaging for treatment planning. Our institution transitioned from computed tomography (CT)-based planning to MRI-based planning with the hypothesis that improved visualization could reduce treatment-related toxicity. This study aimed to compare the patient-reported health-related quality of life (hrQOL) and physician-graded toxicity outcomes of CT-based and MRI-based HDR prostate brachytherapy.MethodsFrom 2016 to 2019, 122 patients with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer were treated with HDR brachytherapy as monotherapy. Patients underwent CT only or CT and MRI imaging for treatment planning and were grouped per treatment planning imaging modality. Patient-reported hrQOL in the genitourinary (GU), gastrointestinal (GI), and sexual domains was assessed using International Prostate Symptom Score and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form-26 questionnaires. Baseline characteristics, changes in hrQOL scores, and physician-graded toxicities were compared between groups.ResultsThe median follow-up was 18 months. Patient-reported GU, GI, and sexual scores worsened after treatment but returned toward baseline over time. The CT cohort had a lower baseline mean International Prostate Symptom Score (5.8 vs. 7.8, p = 0.03). The other patient-reported GU and GI scores did not differ between groups. Overall, sexual scores were similar between the CT and MRI cohorts (p = 0.08) but favored the MRI cohort at later follow-up with a smaller decrease in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form-26 sexual score from baseline at 18 months (4.9 vs. 19.8, p = 0.05). Maximum physician-graded GU, GI, and sexual toxicity rates of grade ≥2 were 68%, 3%, and 53%, respectively, with no difference between the cohorts (p = 0.31).ConclusionOur study shows that CT- and MRI-based HDR brachytherapy results in similar rates of GU and GI toxicity. MRI-based planning may result in improved erectile function recovery compared with CT-based planning.     

Transperineal mapping biopsy improves selection of brachytherapy boost for men with localized prostate cancer

PURPOSETo determine if transperineal mapping biopsy (TPMB) can improve the selection of brachytherapy alone (BT) or brachytherapy boost (BTB) in men with localized prostate cancer.Methods and MaterialsTwo hundred and eighteen men underwent TPMB with a mean of 48.6 cores retrieved. Comparisons were made between prebiopsy risk features and biopsy results to treatment choice with associations tested with ANOVA (bootstrap), χ² test (Pearson), and linear regression. Survival estimates were tested by the Kaplan–Meier method with comparisons by log rank.ResultsMean age, prostate specific antigen (PSA), prostate specific antigen density (PSAD), and prostate volume were 67.2 years, 8.1 ng/mL, 0.19, and 50.3 cc, respectively. 105 (48.2%) biopsies were positive for Gleason Group (GG) 1: 34 (32.4%), 2: 21 (20%), 3: 31 (29.5%), 4: 7 (6.7%), and 5: 12 (11.4%). The mean number of positive cores (PCs) was 7.3 (median 6, range 1–37). Men with six or more PCs had higher PSA (11.3 vs. 6.0 ng/mL, p = 0.025) and PSAD (0.34 vs. 0.13, p = 0.013). Overall brachytherapy was used in 74 (70.5%) as either monotherapy or boost therapy. Men with BTB had higher PSA (9.7 vs. 6.7 ng/mL, p = 0.029), PSAD (0.27 vs. 0.16, p = 0.007), GG (3.3 vs. 1.8, p < 0.001), more bilateral disease (75.9% vs. 55.6%, odds ratio 3.9, p = 0.008), and PCs (10.9 vs. 4.4, p < 0.001). On linear regression, only GG (p = 0.008) and PCs (p = 0.044) were associated with BTB. Biochemical-free failure at 5 years was 92.7%.ConclusionsTPMB improves the selection of patients for BTB. Men with more PCs are more likely to have BTB. Restricting the need for BTB to those with greater volume prostate cancer may reduce radiation side effects.     

Comparison of dose-escalated,image-guided radiotherapy vs. dose-escalated,high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost in a modern cohort of intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients

PurposeWe compared outcomes in intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients treated with dose-escalated adaptive image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) or dose-escalated high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost (HDR-B).Methods and MaterialsPatients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer by National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria were treated with either CT-based off-line adaptive IGRT (n = 734) or HDR-B (n = 282). IGRT was delivered with 3D-conformal or intensity-modulated radiation therapy with a median dose of 77.4 Gy. For HDR-B, the whole pelvis received a median 46 Gy, and the prostate 2 implants of 9.5 Gy (n = 71), 10.5 Gy (n = 155), or 11.5 Gy (n = 56).ResultsMedian followup was 3.7 years for IGRT and 8.0 years for HDR-B (p < 0.001). Eight-year biochemical control was 86% for IGRT and 91% for HDR-B (p = 0.22), disease-free survival 67% for IGRT and 79% for HDR-B (p = 0.006), and overall survival 75% for IGRT and 86% for HDR-B (p = 0.009). Cause-specific survival (8-year, 100% vs. 99%), freedom from distant metastases (98% vs. 97%), and freedom from local recurrence (98% vs. 98%) did not differ (p > 0.50 each). A worse prognosis group was defined by percent positive prostate biopsy cores >50%, perineural invasion, or stage T2b–c, encompassing 260 (35%) IGRT and 171 (61%) HDR-B patients. These patients evidenced a 5-year biochemical control of 96% for HDR-B and 87% for IGRT (p = 0.002).ConclusionsDose-escalated IGRT and HDR-B both yield excellent clinical outcomes for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Improved biochemical control with HDR-B for patients with worse pretreatment characteristics suggests that a subgroup of intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients may benefit from dual-modality treatment.     

After ASCENDE-RT: Biochemical and survival outcomes following combined external beam radiotherapy and low-dose-rate brachytherapy for high-risk and unfavourable intermediate-risk prostate cancer,a population-based analysis

PURPOSETo evaluate the outcomes of unfavorable intermediate-risk (UIR) and high-risk (HR) prostate cancer patients treated with combined external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDR-PB).METHODS AND MATERIALSA population-based cohort of 568 prostate cancer patients treated with combined EBRT and LDR-PB from 2010 to 2016 was analyzed. All patients received EBRT followed by LDR-PB boost. Outcomes were compared with the results for the brachytherapy arm of the ASCENDE-RT trial.RESULTSThe median followup was 4.5 years. Sixty-nine percent (N = 391) had HR disease. Ninety-four percent of the HR and 57% of UIR were treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with a median duration of 12 months. The 5-year K-M biochemical progression-free survival (b-PFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS) were 84 ± 2%, 90 ± 2%, and 88 ± 2%, similar to 89 ± 5%, 94 ± 4%, and 92 ± 4% for the ASCENDE-RT LDR-PB arm. The likelihood of achieving a PSA ≤0.2 ng/mL at 4 years was 88%, similar to 86% in the ASCENDE-RT LDR-PB arm. Thirty-three men (5.8%) would have been ineligible for ASCENDE-RT due to high-risk features. The 5-year K-M b-PFS, MFS and OS estimates were 86 ± 2%, 92 ± 1% and 89 ± 2% for the ASCENDE-RT eligible versus 56 ± 10% (p < 0.001), 73 ± 8% (p < 0.001), and 77 ± 9% (p = 0.098) for the ineligible patients.CONCLUSIONSIn this population-based cohort, combining LDR-PB with pelvic EBRT (+/- ADT) achieves very favorable b-PFS that compares to the LDR-PB arm of the ASCENDE-RT, supporting the generalizability of those results. Men ineligible for ASCENDE-RT, based on prognostic features, have a much higher risk of biochemical recurrence and metastatic relapse.     

Establishing a simulation-based education program for radiation oncology learners in permanent seed implant brachytherapy: Building validation evidence

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to establish a simulation-based education program for radiation oncology learners in permanent seed implant brachytherapy. The first step in formalizing any education program is a validation process that builds evidence-based verification that the learning environment is appropriate.Methods and MaterialsThe primary education task allowed practitioners to use an anthropomorphic breast phantom to simulate a permanent seed implant brachytherapy delivery. Validation evidence is built by generating data to assess learner and expert cohorts according to their proficiency. Each practitioner's performance during the simulation was evaluated by seed placement accuracy, procedural time-to-complete, and two qualitative evaluation tools—a global rating scale and procedural checklist.ResultsThe average seed placement accuracy (±SD) was 8.1 ± 3.5 mm compared to 6.1 ± 2.6 mm for the learner and expert cohort, respectively. The median (range) procedural time-to-complete was 64 (60–77) minutes and 43 (41–50) minutes for the learner and expert cohort, respectively. Seed placement accuracy (student t-test, p < 0.05) and procedural time-to-complete (Mann–Whitney U-test, p < 0.05) were statistically different between the cohorts. In both the global rating scale and procedural checklist, the expert cohort demonstrated improved proficiency compared to the learner cohort.ConclusionsThis validation evidence supports the utilization of this simulation environment toward appropriately capturing the delivery experience of practitioners. The results demonstrate that, in all areas of evaluation, expert cohort proficiency was superior to learner cohort proficiency. This methodology will be used to establish a simulation-based education program for radiation oncology learners in permanent seed implant brachytherapy.     

Patient-reported quality of life after salvage brachytherapy for radio-recurrent prostate cancer: A prospective Phase II study

BackgroundPatient-reported quality of life (QOL) after salvage brachytherapy for radiorecurrent prostate cancer has not been well-characterized prospectively.MethodsWe examined 25 men who recurred after primary radiotherapy for prostate cancer and received MRI-guided salvage brachytherapy as part of a prospective Phase II study. These patients received prospectively a validated patient-reported QOL questionnaire to fill out at baseline, as well as 3, 15, and 27 months after re-irradiation to determine the degree of sexual, bowel, and urinary dysfunction (maximum dysfunction score = 100).ResultsOn average, sexual function continued to decline with time, and patients had significantly worse sexual function scores at 27 months than baseline (p = 0.01). Although bowel and urinary symptoms worsened acutely at 3 or 15 months, they showed on average some improvement by 27 months, and there were no significant differences between baseline and 27-month urinary or bowel scores. An interval to re-irradiation less than 4.5 years and prior brachytherapy were each associated significantly with the largest decrements in bowel function (p = 0.035).ConclusionSimilar to the patterns seen in the de novo setting, patients who receive salvage brachytherapy report a worsening of bowel and urinary symptoms followed by some improvement by 27 months, while sexual function steadily declines over time. Interval to re-irradiation and type of prior radiation received may be used to counsel and optimize selection of men for salvage brachytherapy with regard to QOL endpoints.     

Quality comparison between three-dimensional T2-weighted SPACE and two-dimensional T2-weighted turbo spin echo magnetic resonance images for the brachytherapy planning evaluation of prostate and periprostatic anatomy

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to compare an isotropic three-dimensional (3D) T2-weighted sequence sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts by using flip angle evolution (SPACE) with an axial two-dimensional T2-weighted turbo spin echo (TSE) sequence with regard to overall image quality and the delineation of normal prostate and periprostatic anatomy for low-dose-rate prostate cancer brachytherapy planning evaluation.Methods and MaterialsPatients (n = 69) with prostate cancer who had pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for low-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment planning were included. Three radiologists independently assessed the visibility of nine anatomic structures on each sequence by using a 5-point scale and overall image quality by using a 4-point scale. The significance of the differences in diagnostic performance was tested with a Wilcoxon signed rank test.ResultsNo significant intersequence differences were found for most (7/9) anatomical structures and overall image quality. The mean scores for visibility of anatomical structures on the 3D SPACE and 2D TSE sequences, respectively, were as follows: the zonal anatomy (3.7; 3.9, p = 0.05), prostate capsule (3.9; 4.0, p = 0.08), neurovascular bundle (2.9; 2.9, p = 0.9), rectoprostatic angle (3.8; 3.8, p = 0.35), rectum (4.2; 4.3, p = 0.26), urethra (3.8; 3.9, p = 0.12), urinary bladder (4.6; 4.6, p = 0.61), and overall image quality (2.9; 2.9, p = 0.33). 3D SPACE was superior for delineation of the genitourinary diaphragm (3.8; 3.6, p = 0.003), whereas 2D TSE was superior for delineation of the seminal vesicles (3.5; 4.0, p < 0.0001).ConclusionsAnatomic delineation of the prostatic and periprostatic anatomy provided by the 3D SPACE sequence is as robust in quality as that provided by a conventional 2D TSE sequence with superior delineation of the genitourinary diaphragm. For MRI-based brachytherapy treatment planning, the 3D SPACE sequence with subcentimeter isotropic resolution can replace the 2D TSE sequence and be incorporated into standard MRI protocols.     

The American Brachytherapy Society prostate brachytherapy LDR/HDR simulation workshops: Hands-on,step-by-step training in the process of quality assurance

PurposeEducation and training on prostate brachytherapy for radiation oncology and medical physics residents in the United States is inadequate, resulting in fewer competent radiation oncology personnel to perform implants, and is a factor in the subsequent decline of an important, potentially curative cancer treatment modality for patients with cancer. The American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) leadership has recognized the need to establish a sustainable medical simulation low-dose-rate (LDR) and high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy workshop program that includes physician–physicist teams to rapidly translate knowledge to establish high-quality brachytherapy programs.MethodsThe ABS, in partnership with industry and academia, has held three radiation oncology team–based LDR/HDR workshops composed of physician–physicist teams in Chicago in 2017, in Houston in 2018, and in Denver in 2019. The predefined key metric of success is the number of attendees who returned to their respective institutions and were actively performing brachytherapy within 6 months of the prostate brachytherapy workshop.ResultsOf the 111 physician/physicist teams participating in the Chicago, Houston, and Denver prostate brachytherapy workshops, 87 (78%) were actively performing prostate brachytherapy (51 [59%] HDR and 65 [75%] LDR).ConclusionsThe ABS prostate brachytherapy LDR/HDR simulation workshop has provided a successful education and training structure for medical simulation of the critical procedural steps in quality assurance to shorten the learning curve for delivering consistently high-quality brachytherapy implants for patients with prostate cancer. An ABS initiative, intended to bend the negative slope of the brachytherapy curve, is currently underway to train 300 new competent brachytherapy teams over the next 10 years.     

Long-term outcomes of prostate cancer patients with Gleason pattern 5 treated with combined brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy

PurposeRecent reports have suggested relatively poor prognosis for prostate cancer patients with Gleason pattern 5 treated with dose-escalated external beam radiotherapy (XRT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). We present the largest series of men with high-risk, Gleason pattern 5 prostate cancer treated with permanent interstitial brachytherapy and XRT.Methods and MaterialsBetween April 1995 and December 2008, 329 consecutive patients with National Comprehensive Cancer Network high-risk disease were treated with permanent interstitial brachytherapy. Most received XRT and ADT. Median followup was 7.2 years. The cause of death was determined for each deceased patient. Multiple clinical, treatment, and dosimetric parameters were evaluated for impact on the evaluated survival parameters.ResultsAt 10 years, biochemical progression-free survival, cause-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival for the group of high-risk patients as a whole was 91.1%, 95.5%, and 72.5%, respectively. There was no difference in biochemical progression-free survival between men with and without Gleason pattern 5 (89.7% vs. 91.8%; p = 0.56). However, men with Gleason pattern 5 had lower prostate cancer CSS (90.3% vs. 98.1%; p = 0.011). There was no difference in overall survival comparing men with and without Gleason pattern 5 disease (67.7% vs. 75.4%; p = 0.14).ConclusionsMen with high-risk, Gleason pattern 5 histology treated with brachytherapy and XRT have excellent long-term outcomes, which compare favorably to dose-escalated XRT/ADT series without brachytherapy. Nonetheless, Gleason pattern 5 results in lower CSS than high-risk disease without Gleason pattern 5.     

Improved rectal dosimetry with the use of SpaceOAR during high-dose-rate brachytherapy

PurposeHydrogel spacers have been suggested to limit rectal radiation dose with improvements in clinical outcomes in patients undergoing external beam radiation treatment for prostate cancer. No studies to date have assessed the utility and dosimetric effect of SpaceOAR (Augmenix, Inc, Waltham, MA), the only Food and Drug Administration–approved hydrogel rectal spacer, for high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy.MethodsEighteen consecutive patients scheduled for HDR brachytherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer underwent transperineal ultrasound-guided placement of 10 cc of SpaceOAR hydrogel following catheter implantation. Treatment plans were generated using an inverse planning simulated annealing algorithm. Rectal dosimetry for these 18 patients was compared with the 36 preceding patients treated with HDR brachytherapy without SpaceOAR.ResultsFifty-four plans were analyzed. There was no difference in age, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen, Gleason score, clinical stage, prostate volume, or contoured rectal volume between those who received SpaceOAR and those who did not. Patients who received SpaceOAR hydrogel had significantly lower dose to the rectum as measured by percent of contoured organ at risk (median, V₈₀ < 0.005% vs. 0.010%, p = 0.003; V₇₅ < 0.005% vs. 0.14%, p < 0.0005; V₇₀ 0.09% vs. 0.88%, p < 0.0005; V₆₀ = 1.16% vs. 3.08%, p < 0.0005); similar results were seen for rectal volume in cubic centimeters. One patient who received SpaceOAR developed a perineal abscess 1 month after treatment.ConclusionsTransperineal insertion of SpaceOAR hydrogel at the time of HDR brachytherapy is feasible and decreases rectal radiation dose. Further investigation is needed to assess the clinical impact of this dosimetric improvement and potential toxicity reduction.     

Resident experience in brachytherapy: An analysis of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education case logs for intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy from 2007 to 2018

PurposeWe sought to characterize temporal trends of radiation oncology resident–reported case experience with intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) and interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT).Methods and MaterialsSummarized, deidentified case logs for graduating radiation oncology residents (GRORs) between 2007 and 2018 were obtained from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education national summary data report. Cases were subdivided based on the site of treatment. Analysis of variance was used to determine differences, and strength of association was evaluated using the Pearson correlation.ResultsThe number of GRORs increased by 66% from 114 in 2007 to 189 in 2018 (p < 0.001). Average number of gynecologic ICBT cases per GROR increased, from 39.6 in 2007 to 48.7 in 2018 (p < 0.005). Average number of ISBT cases per GROR decreased, from 34.5 to 20.6 (p < 0.001), due to decreasing prostate volume, from 21.5 to 12 (p < 0.001). Experience with gynecologic ISBT cases remained low at an average of 4.5 cases per year.ConclusionsThe average number of ICBT cases per GROR has increased, although this does not differentiate between cylinder and tandem-based insertions currently. There has been a steady decline in ISBT experience. These findings may have implications for the development of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education case minimums for residency programs.     

A comparison of early prostate-specific antigen decline between prostate brachytherapy and different fractionation of external beam radiation—Impact on biochemical failure

PurposeThe aim of this study was to compare early prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline patterns and PSA nadirs between low-dose-rate seed prostate brachytherapy (LDR-PB) and different fractionations of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and their predictive importance for biochemical failure (bF).Methods and MaterialsPatients with D'Amico low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer who underwent a single-modality treatment without androgen deprivation were included in this study. Three different treatment groups were compared: (1) normofractionation EBRT up to 70.2–79.2 Gy/1.8–2.0 Gy, (2) LDR-PB, and (3) EBRT with hypofractionation 60 Gy/3 Gy daily or 5–7.25 Gy once a week over 9–5 weeks, to a total dose of 45–36.25 Gy, respectively. The log-rank test, Cox regression analysis, and nonparametric tests were used.ResultsWe analyzed 892 patients: the median followup for patients without bF was 84 months (interquartile range 60–102 months), with 12% of patients experiencing bF. The PSA decline within the first 15 months was generally exponential. LDR-PB showed a faster early exponential decline compared with EBRT treatments, but whether decline was fast or slow had no influence on recurrence. The only factors that were positive predictive factors in univariate and multivariate analyses were the time to nadir >48 months (median), PSA nadir <0.5 ng/mL, and <0.2 ng/mL (all p < 0.001).ConclusionsAlthough there are significant differences in early exponential PSA decline between different treatments, only the PSA nadir and longer time to nadir were predictive factors for bF.     

Manual vs. automated implantation of seeds in prostate brachytherapy: Oncologic results from a single-center study

PurposeThe objective of this study was to study survival and tolerance of prostate cancer patients treated with ¹²⁵I permanent interstitial brachytherapy by automated vs. manual implantation of seeds.Methods and MaterialsBetween 2002 and 2010, 349 selected patients were treated with ¹²⁵I brachytherapy by the same team: from 2002 to April 2005, 65 patients with linked seeds and then 284 patients treated using Nucletron First System automated implantation. We analyzed biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) rates and toxicities (univariate and multivariate analyses).ResultsTwo hundred seventy-seven (79.4%) and 69 patients (19.8%) with low- and intermediate-risk disease were treated, respectively (median follow-up: 64 months). The 5-year bRFS rate was 93.1% (95% confidence interval 89.3–95.6) for the entire cohort. The 5-year bRFS rates were 93.4% and 91.7% for patients with low- and intermediate-risk disease, respectively (p = 0.42). In univariate and multivariate analyses, there was no statistically significant difference in the 5-year bRFS rate depending on the implantation technique (93.1% vs. 91.8%, respectively, for automated and linked seeds; p = 0.53). In univariate analysis, only D₉₀ prostate (dose delivered to 90% of the prostate) <140 Gy (p = 0.01), lack of prostate-specific antigen bounce (p = 0.008), and nadir prostate-specific antigen >0.11 (p = 0.01) were predictive factors for bRFS. We observed Grade 3 urethritis in 7 patients (2%), urinary incontinence in 2 patients (0.7%), and Grade 4 proctitis in 2 patients (0.7%).ConclusionsIn this large single-center series, brachytherapy for selected localized prostate cancer achieved excellent rates of biochemical control at 5 years (93.1%) with an acceptable toxicity profile, irrespective of the implantation technique used.     

Pride or prejudice: Does Phoenix flatter radiation therapy?

PurposeTo compare disease-free survival (DFS) rates using a >0.4 ng/mL biochemical failure definition with the Phoenix (nadir+2 ng/mL) failure definition by analyzing a consecutive cohort of 1006 patients treated with low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDR-PB) monotherapy.Methods and MaterialsData for first 1006 consecutive LDR-PB implants (1998–2003) were extracted from a prospective database. Patients had low- (58%) or intermediate (42%)-risk disease. Three months neoadjuvant and 3 months concomitant androgen deprivation therapy were used in 65% of cases. The Phoenix definition was modified to “unfail” patients who had a benign prostate-specific antigen (PSA) bounce.ResultsThe median followup is 7.5 years. The median PSA at latest followup for disease-free patients was 0.04 ng/mL. The Phoenix definition yielded 5- and 10-year Kaplan–Meier DFS estimates of 96.5 ± 1.2% and 93.7 ± 2.0%, respectively. Applying the >0.4 ng/mL threshold reduced these estimates to 94.4 ± 1.6% and 88.8 ± 3.0% (log rank, p = 0.015).ConclusionsCompared with Phoenix, applying a >0.4 ng/mL failure definition increased biochemical failure by ∼2% at 5 years and ∼5% at 10 years. These data show that Phoenix did not greatly exaggerate DFS estimates compared with a surgical-type threshold. However, this observation is a consequence of the exceptionally low residual PSA values characteristic of LDR-PB and cannot be generalized to other forms of radiation therapy.     

Prostate brachytherapy in men with gland volume of 100 cc or greater: Technique,cancer control,and morbidity

PurposeTo determine the outcomes of prostate seed implantation in men with prostate volume (PV) of 100 cc or greater (PV100).MethodsA total of 2051 men with localized prostate cancer were treated with permanent prostate brachytherapy of whom 34 (1.7%) had PV100 (mean, 126.2; range, 100–205 cc). The PV100 patients were older (mean, 69 vs. 66 years; p = 0.031), had higher initial prostate-specific antigen level (20.4 vs. 9.6 ng/mL, p < 0.001), and received a lower dose (182 vs. 194 Gy₂ biologic equivalent dose, p = 0.032). There were no differences in clinical stage, Gleason score, and baseline International Prostate Symptom Score. The mean followup time was 6.7 years (range, 2–18). Biochemical freedom from failure (bFFF) was defined using the Phoenix definition.ResultsThe BFFF at 10 years was no different between PV100 and smaller glands (82.4% vs. 84.5%, p = 0.71). At last followup, mean International Prostate Symptom Score for PV100 increased from 8.5 to 9.1 against 7.4 to 9.2 for smaller glands (p = 0.935). Urinary retention rates were higher for PV100 (6/34, 17.6% vs. 148/2017, 7.3%; odds ratio, 2.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.1–6.6; p = 0.038). Postimplant transurethral resection of the prostate was performed in none of the 34 patients with PV100 against 66 of the 2017 patients (3.3%, p < 0.001). Long-term radiation proctitis for PV100 were 1 of 34 (2.9%) against 82 of 2017 (4.1%, p = 0.741). Rectourethral fistula occurred in 4 patients (0.19%), that is, 1 of 34 (2.9%) in PV100 group and 3 of 2017 (0.1%, p < 0.001).ConclusionThis study demonstrates the feasibility of implanting patients with PV100. Very large PV does not influence bFFF. Although urinary retention rates were higher, the long-term urinary symptoms were no different between the two groups. Requirement for transurethral resection of the prostate was no higher in patients with PV100. Radiation proctitis rates were similar for both.