首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
BackgroundThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) restricts dispensing of mifepristone for medication abortion to certified health care providers at clinical facilities, thus prohibiting pharmacist dispensing. Allowing mifepristone dispensing by pharmacists could improve access to medication abortion.ObjectiveTo assess the feasibility of pharmacists dispensing mifepristone to patients who have undergone evaluation for eligibility and counseling for medication abortion by a clinician.MethodsBefore providing a study training on medication abortion, we administered baseline surveys to pharmacists who participated in a multisite mifepristone-dispensing intervention. The survey assessed medication abortion knowledge—using a 15-item score—and perceptions about the benefits and challenges of the model. We administered follow-up surveys in the study’s final month that also assessed the pharmacists’ satisfaction and experiences with mifepristone dispensing. To investigate the association of the study intervention with the pharmacists’ knowledge, perceptions, and experiences dispensing mifepristone, we conducted multivariable linear regression analyses using generalized estimating equation models, accounting for clustering by individual.ResultsAmong the 72 pharmacists invited from 6 pharmacies, 47 (65%) completed the baseline surveys, and 56 (78%) received training. At the study’s end (mean 18 months later), 43 of the 56 pharmacists who received training (77%) completed the follow-up surveys. At follow-up, 36 (83%) respondents were very or somewhat satisfied with mifepristone dispensing, and 24 (56%) reported experiencing no challenges dispensing mifepristone. Four (6%) of the 72 pharmacists invited objected to participating in mifepristone dispensing. In regression analyses, average knowledge scores, perceived ease of implementation, and level of support for the pharmacist-dispensing model were higher at follow-up (P < 0.001).ConclusionMost pharmacists were willing to be trained, dispensed mifepristone with few challenges when given the opportunity, were satisfied with the model, and had higher knowledge levels at follow-up. Our findings support removal of FDA’s restriction on pharmacist dispensing of mifepristone.  相似文献   

5.
6.
7.
BackgroundIncreases in opioid use and related harms such as mortality are occurring in many high income countries. Community pharmacists are often in contact with patients at risk of opioid-related harm and represent an ideal point for intervention. Best practice in monitoring opioid-related outcomes involves assessing analgesia, pain functioning, mood, risks and harms associated with opioid use. Community pharmacists are well-placed to undertake these tasks.ObjectivesOur pilot study will test the implementation of a computer-facilitated screening and brief intervention (SBI). The SBI will support pharmacist identification of opioid-related problems and provide capacity for brief intervention including verbal reinforcement of tailored information sheets, supply of naloxone and referral back to the opioid prescriber. The SBI utilises software that embeds study procedures into dispensing workflow and assesses opioid outcomes with domains aligned with a widely accepted clinical framework.MethodsWe will recruit and train 75 pharmacists from 25 pharmacies to deliver the Routine Opioid Outcome Monitoring (ROOM) SBI. Pharmacists will complete the SBI with up to 500 patients in total (20 per pharmacy). Data will be collected on pharmacists’ knowledge and confidence through pre- and post-intervention online surveys. Data on feasibility, acceptability and implementation outcomes, including naloxone supply, will also be collected.Project impactOur study will examine changes in pharmacists’ knowledge and confidence to deliver the SBI. Through the implementation pilot, we will establish the feasibility and acceptability of a pharmacist SBI that aims to improve monitoring and clinical management of patients who are prescribed opioids.  相似文献   

8.
Background Epilepsy is a chronic condition requiring compliance to long treatment regimes. Knowledge on epilepsy can affect compliance to treatment. Pediatric epileptic patients need caregivers for their care; however, prior research showed that caregivers had inadequate knowledge in epilepsy. In view of this, outpatient pharmacist epilepsy service was set up in collaboration with neurologists to bridge knowledge gaps. Objective To determine if caregiver education provided by outpatient pharmacists is associated with improved knowledge in epilepsy and its management. Setting Pediatric outpatient clinic at a pediatric and women’s health hospital. Methods A cross-sectional pre- to post-intervention study using scores of caregiver knowledge of epilepsy as the primary outcome was conducted. The intervention was one counseling session by pharmacists. A knowledge questionnaire (A) was administered to the caregiver to obtain baseline information before the session and readministered by telephone (C) 2 weeks post-session. Additionally, a perception questionnaire (B) was administered immediately after the session. Main outcome measure Knowledge scores pre and post pharmacist counseling. Results Twenty-seven completed questionnaire sets (A, B and C) were collected from 55 caregivers who received the intervention (response rate = 49 %) between September 2010 and May 2011. Average post-counseling knowledge scores was significantly higher than pre-counseling scores (14.7 vs. 10.4, p = 0.000) (score range ?21 to 21). Caregivers’ confidence to administer antiepileptic drugs to the child increased significantly from 3.60 to 3.94 post-counseling (p = 0.002, score range 0–5). Mean total satisfaction score was 36.00 (score range 5–40). Conclusion A specialized counseling session given by pharmacists increased caregiver’s knowledge about epilepsy and medication adherence. The session was well received by caregivers. Pharmacists should continue to be involved in the care of epileptic patients.  相似文献   

9.
ObjectivesTo evaluate the usefulness of assistive technology in health care interactions between student pharmacists and simulated patients who are deaf/hard of hearing and to assess changes in confidence and comfort levels (among both groups) when using assistive technology.MethodsForty-nine second-year student pharmacists were enrolled in a pharmacy communication laboratory course and 8 undergraduate students were recruited during Fall 2019. The first communication laboratory interaction consisted of student pharmacists using their normal mode of communication with role-played patients who are deaf/hard of hearing to establish baseline measures; a pretest survey was administered to each participant at the conclusion of this 10-minute laboratory interaction. In the second laboratory interaction, student pharmacists used the app to assist in communicating with the simulated patients who are deaf/hard of hearing. Posttests were administered at the conclusion of this laboratory interaction.ResultsMost student pharmacists and simulated patients who are deaf/hard of hearing reported feeling able to effectively communicate their needs to the other individual in their dyad (pharmacist or patient) during their health care interactions. Using an iPad (Apple Inc) app to communicate significantly increased student pharmacist and simulated patient comfort with health care communication from preintervention to postintervention.ConclusionThe use of assistive technology in simulated communication laboratory interactions can enhance student pharmacist comfort in health care interactions with patients who are deaf/hard of hearing.  相似文献   

10.
11.
12.
ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to estimate the association between health care practitioner counseling on medication disposal and disposal of unused opioid medications.DesignA 41-item survey instrument was created and administered to a nationally representative panel of adult opioid users with chronic pain using a cross-sectional, internet survey design via Qualtrics®.ParticipantsFour hundred adult opioid users with chronic pain were randomly selected from the Qualtrics® panel-base to participate.SettingUnited States.Outcome measuresThe dependent variable, disposal of unused opioid medications, was assessed with a single item asking participants how often they had disposed of unused opioid medications in the past year. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the association between opioid disposal and the receipt of health care practitioner counseling on medication disposal.ResultsA total of 400 surveys were completed. Participants were mostly white (70.8%) and under the age of 40 (54.1%). Less than one-half of all participants (44.5%) had disposed of opioid medications in the past year, while 60.75% had received health care practitioner counseling on disposal. Of those counseled, only 21.4% were counseled by a pharmacist. Flushing medication down the toilet (33%) was the most common method of opioid disposal. After adjustment for covariates, those who received health care practitioner counseling were more likely to have disposed of opioid medications in the past year (adjusted odds ratio 1.66, 95% CI 1.03-2.69).ConclusionsParticipants who received counseling on opioid disposal were more likely to have disposed of unused opioid medications. Pharmacists are uniquely positioned to counsel patients on opioid disposal and thus must be active in preventing harm and diversion due to improperly stored opioid medications. This study demonstrates the need for enhanced provider education and policy to ensure that patients are adequately counseled on proper opioid disposal.  相似文献   

13.
ObjectiveTo assess the clinical impact of an intensive community pharmacy-based Health and Wellness Introductory Pharmacy Practice Experience (IPPE) completed by second-year (P2) student pharmacists.DesignThe Health and Wellness IPPE was a 1-week rotation developed to provide P2 student pharmacists with opportunities to provide clinical services to patients within the community pharmacy setting. Student pharmacists administered immunizations, performed blood pressure screenings and blood glucose measurements, and provided education to patients under the guidance of licensed pharmacist preceptors.Setting and participantsSecond-year student pharmacists completing a required Health and Wellness IPPE rotation in the community pharmacy setting.Outcomes measuredStudent pharmacist interventions were assessed to determine the course’s clinical impact, and preceptors were surveyed regarding the feasibility of student pharmacists performing clinical services at their training sites.ResultsA total of 147 student pharmacists completed the IPPE at 89 community pharmacy training sites and administered 9392 injections, 90% of which were influenza vaccinations. Student pharmacists performed 3458 patient health assessments, including measuring patients’ blood pressure and blood glucose and reviewing patient education materials. Most preceptors indicated that core activities were feasible during the experience.ConclusionThis study found that implementing a concentrated IPPE focused on immunizations and health screenings allowed student pharmacists to enhance their clinical skills and fulfill a large public health need, improving patient outcomes. Future studies should explore utilizing student pharmacists in community pharmacy settings to expand clinical services offered beyond these 2 services, such as diabetes risk tests, influenza point-of-care testing, and smoking cessation counseling.  相似文献   

14.
15.
李辉  陈碧  李洁  王安发  徐雨佳 《肿瘤药学》2022,12(2):252-255
目的 探索临床药师在癌痛药物治疗中的作用。方法 临床药师以会诊的形式参与1例重度癌痛患者的药物治疗。通过开展癌痛评估,结合患者用药史及临床表现,临床药师判断患者合并癌性神经病理性疼痛,出现阿片类药物耐受,针对性调整药物止痛治疗方案并指导患者用药。结果 临床药师的参与有效减轻了患者的疼痛程度,提高了患者的生活质量。结论 临床药师在癌痛的药物治疗中发挥了有效作用。  相似文献   

16.
17.
18.
19.
BackgroundThere is a critical need in primary care to proactively prevent, identify, and resolve poor medication-related outcomes. However, more than 80% of primary care practices do not have clinical pharmacists as members of expanded care teams. The emergence of eConsult services in primary care settings presents an opportunity for primary care providers (PCPs) to consult with clinical pharmacists as “on-demand” pharmacotherapy specialists.ObjectivesThe objectives were to (1) determine the use of a clinical pharmacist in an existing eConsult network, (2) characterize the use and type of clinical pharmacist eConsults sent by PCPs, and (3) measure the implementation percentage of pharmacist recommendations by PCPs.MethodsThe study was conducted in a federally qualified health center using an existing eConsult platform. A clinical pharmacist was contracted to receive eConsults and was expected to respond within 2 business days. PCPs were introduced to the pharmacist eConsult service through presentations that reviewed the clinical pharmacist’s education/training, suitable pharmacist eConsult topics, and workflow for sending a pharmacist eConsult.ResultsA total of 57 eConsults containing 123 individual questions were answered. Advanced practice nurses (APRNs) sent 3 times the number of eConsults and individual questions per eConsult compared with physicians (P < 0.0001). Most eConsult questions from APRNs related to adverse drug events/drug interactions (44%), drug or dosage changes to reach therapeutic goals (18%), and renal/hepatic dosage adjustments (13%). However, physician eConsult questions were primarily targeted on patient-specific drug or dosage adjustments (62%) and comprehensive medication regimen reviews (17%). A total of 74% of the pharmacist eConsult responses had at least 50% of the recommendations implemented by PCPs.ConclusionThis study revealed the use of a pharmacist eConsult service for medication-related questions in an existing eConsult network for PCPs. As more practices enroll in value-based plans, pharmacist eConsults can improve the quality and safety of prescribing and chronic medication management.  相似文献   

20.

Objective

To assess patients’ perceptions of student pharmacist–run mobile influenza immunization clinics, including satisfaction, comfort, comparison to other experiences, and the views of pharmacists as immunizers.

Methods

A 7-item survey was designed to assess patient satisfaction with receiving influenza vaccinations from student pharmacists, to compare the experience with vaccines received in nonpharmacy settings, and to determine the impact of the experience on patients’ views of pharmacist-administered vaccines. The anonymous survey was provided to patients in the postvaccination monitoring area for campus and non–campus mobile clinics from September through October of 2017.

Results

Student pharmacists administered 1303 immunizations to patients at 27 campus or community-based mobile clinics. Of 928 patients (71.2% response rate) completing the survey, 90.9% had previously received at least 2 prior influenza vaccinations. More than 98% of patients were very satisfied or satisfied with the student pharmacist–run mobile flu clinic. Similarly, more than 98% of patients were very comfortable or comfortable receiving immunizations from a student pharmacist, and 99.9% of patients rated the experience as either better or similar to previous vaccinations received in nonpharmacy settings. Although 53.4% already used pharmacists as an immunization resource, an additional 38.5% reported they were more comfortable with pharmacists providing vaccinations as a result of the experience. Only 8.1% of patients reported that they would rather receive vaccinations from a physician or nurse. Reasons cited for choosing the mobile clinic for vaccination included convenience (92.2%), cost (35.8%), and positive past experience (28.9%).

Conclusion

Patients were very satisfied with influenza vaccinations provided by student pharmacists in mobile clinics. The experience appeared to positively affect participants’ views of pharmacists as vaccine providers. Proper training, education, and skill development of student pharmacists are essential for ensuring patient safety and for obtaining and maintaining the trust of the patient and health care community.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号