Support and perceived barriers to implementing pre-exposure prophylaxis screening and dispensing in pharmacies: Examining concordance between pharmacy technicians and pharmacists

ObjectivesRecent legislation to expand pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) screening and dispensing in pharmacies may significantly improve PrEP access for people at a high risk of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission. Studies have shown that pharmacists show wide support for PrEP expansion in pharmacies. However, pharmacy technicians are often the first point of contact for patients in pharmacies and are required to implement many of the tasks to ensure patients of a pharmacy receive adequate services. The purpose of this study was to assess pharmacists’ and pharmacy technicians’ perspectives regarding the implementation of PrEP screening and dispensing.MethodsWe qualitatively examined whether pharmacy technicians’ (n = 6) support and perceived barriers to screening and dispensing PrEP in pharmacies were concordant with those of pharmacists (n = 7). Pharmacy staff were recruited from high-risk HIV neighborhoods in Atlanta, GA using AIDSVu (Atlanta, GA). Two independent coders used MAXQDA (Berlin, Germany) and performed thematic data analysis and unitization to determine agreement.ResultsPharmacists and pharmacy technicians expressed strong willingness and support for screening and dispensing PrEP in pharmacies. Both groups expressed concerns about the time and the resources needed to perform PrEP screening and dispensing. Technicians, however, also reported concerns about privacy for patients, the need for community support and awareness of pharmacy-based PrEP screening, and recommended scheduling of PrEP screening activities during a limited part of the day to facilitate screening. Pharmacists reported fewer barriers but reported a need for more training of pharmacy staff to assist with PrEP screening and dispensing implementation.ConclusionPharmacy technicians discussed more barriers compared with pharmacists who were largely centered around practical considerations (i.e., logistics and workflow) that may affect the success of PrEP screening and dispensing. Given technicians’ pivotal role in the pharmacy, implementation of pharmacy-based PrEP services should address technicians’ perceived barriers in addition to those of pharmacists.     

A qualitative case study exploring the implementation of pharmacist care planning services in community pharmacies

ObjectivesTo describe the comprehensive annual care plan (CACP) process and to conceptualize how remunerated CACP services were implemented by community pharmacists.DesignA comparative, multiple case study approach with data comprising document review, observation, and semistructured interviews.Setting and participantsPharmacists, pharmacy technicians and staff, and student pharmacists from 4 different community pharmacy sites in Alberta, Canada, including independent, franchise, and corporate chain pharmacies. In addition, patients and other health care providers were included in the interviews.Outcome measuresConstructivist grounded theory was used to understand how care planning services were implemented in the real-world context of community pharmacies and how pharmacists provided CACPs within their practice.ResultsBetween May 2016 and January 2018, a total of 77 interviews and 94 hours of observations were completed at the 4 pharmacy sites, and 61 documents were collected. The CACP service required adaptation of the workflow at each of the sites. However, pharmacists and other pharmacy staff recognized benefits of the service with respect to pharmacists’ role expansion. The overarching grounded theory concept was changing the status quo. The following 4 themes emerged representing how the service was implemented: engaging patients, professional development and learning from experience, creating a supportive environment, and building community connections.ConclusionThis study found that practice change or changing the status quo was needed to implement remunerated care planning services in community pharmacies. The results of this study may be of interest to community pharmacists, pharmacy managers, and policy makers who are implementing remunerated care planning services in other jurisdictions.     

新形势下DTP药房对执业药师专业药学服务需求探讨

目的：提升专业药房（DTP药房）执业药师专业能力水平，助力DTP药房健康有序发展。方法：梳理国内外DTP药房产生的背景和发展状况，分析我国DTP药房特点和作用，提出DTP药房对执业药师专业能力的要求。结果：我国DTP药房以提供全周期专业化药学服务为特色，在处方外流、药品带量采购、“双通道”管理机制等政策的激励下，DTP药房面临重要发展机遇。结论：执业药师应不断提升专业的药学服务能力、书写药历和开展药物警戒能力、患者用药信息收集分析能力、全流程药品质量管理能力、沟通协调和人文关怀服务能力，以适应新形势下我国DTP药房发展需求，促进DTP药房为患者提供有价值的健康服务。     

Recommendations and guidance for providing pharmaceutical care services during COVID-19 pandemic: A China perspective

BackgroundThe novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19), which was first detected in Wuhan City, has now became a pandemic that affecting patients around the world. Particularly, the community patient population are at high risk of infection and are facing potential failure of proper medication use during the pandemic.ObjectiveTo discuss community pharmacists’ role and the content of pharmaceutical care (PC) during the novel coronavirus pandemic to promote effective prevention and control and safe drug use of the community patient population.MethodCollect and summarize the experience Chinese community pharmacies gained from providing pharmacy services during the COVID-19 outbreak, and taking patients' PC needs into consideration, analyze and discuss the methods and strategies that community pharmacies and pharmacists shall use to provide PC during the pandemic.ResultsCommunity pharmacy management teams shall support PC services by providing adequate supply of COVID-19 related medications and preventative products, following environment regulations, and providing sufficient staff trainings. Pharmacists shall use various approaches to provide PC services in drug dispensing, consulting and referrals, chronic disease management, safe use of infusions, patient education, home care guidance and psychological support to promote the COVID-19 pandemic control and ensure safe medication use of community patients during the pandemic.ConclusionPC services in communities during the COVID-19 shall possess different properties due to disease characteristics and related change in patients' need. Community pharmacies shall work as a strong supporter of patient's medication and protective equipment supply. Community pharmacists shall be prepared to provide skilled and effective PC services for community patient population to ensure medication safety and promote the overall COVID-19 pandemic control.     

Examining the association between the “My Pharmacist” model and the service quality of community pharmacies

BackgroundIn Japan, patients can freely choose medical facilities. Many visit different medical facilities for different diseases, and for convenience, often utilize the pharmacies neighboring these facilities. Accordingly, a “My Pharmacy” model was recommended, in which patients select a single pharmacy using their own judgement to receive proper medication services. A “My Pharmacist” model, in which the pharmacist is constantly involved in the treatment of a patient, was also proposed. However, patients’ evaluations of pharmacist/pharmacy services under these models have not been investigated.ObjectiveTo examine how a patient's constant involvement with the same pharmacist and pharmacy is associated with their evaluation of the quality of pharmacy services.MethodsA cross-sectional survey using a self-administered questionnaire was conducted among patients who used pharmacies periodically. Patients evaluated the pharmacist/pharmacy services and were classified into 4 groups (“My Pharmacy/My Pharmacist,” “My Pharmacy/Multiple Pharmacists,” “Multiple Pharmacies/My Pharmacist,” and “Multiple Pharmacies/Multiple Pharmacists”) according to the form of their usage of pharmacies and pharmacists. An intergroup comparison was then performed and correlations within each group analyzed.ResultsData from 3,492 individuals using 147 pharmacies were analyzed. “My Pharmacy” users had significantly higher scores than did “Multiple Pharmacies” users on patient experience of proper medication services (e.g., identifying duplicate medication) (p < 0.001). “My Pharmacy/My Pharmacist” users scored higher than the other three groups on four evaluation factors, including “pharmacy/pharmacist's interpersonal services” (“sharing and utilizing patient information,” “enhanced health support function,” and “consideration towards patients”), “patient satisfaction with the pharmacy,” “placing more emphasis on quality of interaction with pharmacist than on waiting time,” and “attitude when visiting healthcare facilities” (all p < 0.001).ConclusionThe findings indicate that highly tailored, in-person services provided by “My Pharmacists” are associated with not only with the degree of patients’ overall satisfaction, but also their evaluation of “the quality of pharmacist services.”     

Pharmacist-reported practice change as a result of a statewide community pharmacy accreditation program

ObjectivesTo assess pharmacist-reported practice change as a result of participation in a community pharmacy accreditation program.SettingCommunity pharmacy practice in Wisconsin.Practice innovationThe Wisconsin Pharmacy Quality Collaborative (WPQC) is a network of pharmacies and pharmacists who provide standardized pharmacy services. WPQC is based on a unique set of quality-based best practices designed to improve patient safety in the medication use process. WPQC is supported by the statewide pharmacy organization, the Pharmacy Society of Wisconsin (PSW), which provides resources focused on implementation and engagement to support the success of WPQC-accredited pharmacies.Program evaluationPSW used a 24-question online survey to evaluate the degree of pharmacist-reported practice change as a result of the WPQC quality-based best practices.ResultsPharmacist-reported frequency and consistency of all quality-based best practices and services increased after WPQC accreditation (P < 0.05), with the exception of robotic dispensing systems, holding regular staff meetings for team communication, and providing incentives for recording quality-related events. In addition, quality-based best practices and WPQC services had a positive impact on pharmacist perceptions of their quality of patient care, patient safety, patient satisfaction, and patient relationships in WPQC-accredited pharmacies. The majority of pharmacies valued WPQC accreditation and shared positive comments about their experiences.ConclusionA community pharmacy accreditation program using standardized quality-based best practices can create and reinforce behavior change in the community pharmacy setting to positively affect patient care and medication safety. Research is needed to determine if there are actual behavior changes as a result of WPQC accreditation compared with pharmacies that have elected not to participate.     

Helping Unlock Better Care (HUB|C) using quality improvement science in community pharmacies – An implementation method

IntroductionCommunity pharmacists’ optimal scope of practice extends far beyond traditional dispensing or compounding, and health promotion or chronic disease management services based in the pharmacy can generate significant social and economic value. But, with many competing demands and performance expectations from patients, payers, and policymakers, many pharmacies face challenges when introducing, maintaining, optimizing, or integrating their service offerings. Quality Improvement (QI) science may provide a practical change management framework for pharmacy professionals to lead their teams in embracing optimal scope and in making pharmacy-based services more feasible and attractive for all parties.Project aimsTo build community pharmacies’ capacity for continuous QI (CQI) and to understand how the implementation of CQI is best achieved in this setting.MethodsCommunity pharmacies will undertake a process of change within one or more existing pharmacy services. Participatory action research principles will empower these sites to identify their own opportunities for improvement, generate change ideas, and trial and study those ideas in practice, using a QI system built on the Model for Improvement and Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. An external Quality Facilitator will consult and train an internal Change Champion and other pharmacy staff to use QI tools and strategy. Mixed methods will be used to explore changes in pharmacy service quality, and to understand the experience of the pharmacy professionals taking part in the QI process.Intended outcomesTo assess the capacity and willingness of community pharmacies to undertake self-directed QI initiatives, with the support of an external Quality Facilitator and an established QI approach. Understandings surrounding the transferability of this process, including further scale-up, and the production of additional change management tools are additional potential outcomes of this work.