First report on the use of a thinner 125I radioactive seed within 20-gauge needles for permanent radioactive seed prostate brachytherapy: Evaluation of postimplant dosimetry and acute toxicity

PurposeTo compare postoperative dosimetry and acute toxicity of new 0.5-mm ¹²⁵I seeds in 20-gauge (20G) diameter prostate brachytherapy (PB) needles with standard 0.8-mm seeds in 18G needles.Methods and MaterialsPostoperative dosimetry was performed on 100 consecutive PB patients treated with ThinSeeds in 20G needles and compared with 100 consecutively treated PB patients using standard-sized seeds and needles (18G). Dosimetry was performed on postoperative Day 1 CT scans. Acute urinary retention was also compared between these two groups. Acute toxicity was evaluated in 22 consecutively treated patients with thinner seeds/needles and compared with 22 consecutive concurrent patients treated with standard seeds and needles. All patients were evaluated by pre- and post-PB self-administered surveys, physical examinations on post-PB Day 1, and telephone surveys on Day 7. Endpoints included dysuria, acute urinary retention, hematuria, perineal pain/bruising, and International Prostate Symptom Score.ResultsPost-PB dosimetric comparison demonstrated that the V₁₀₀ (95% vs. 91%), D₉₀ (161 Gy vs.149 Gy), V₁₅₀ (55% vs. 45%), and RV₁₀₀ (0.43 cc vs. 0.30 cc) were significantly (p < 0.0004) higher in the 20G group. Urinary retention rates were 8% and 7% and median catheter-dependent durations were 7 and 14 days for the 20G and 18G groups, respectively. No significant differences were found for dysuria, hematuria, or International Prostate Symptom Score. Post-PB Day 1 perineal bruising and pain scores on Days 1 and 7 were significantly less (p < 0.04) in 20G cohort.ConclusionsSmaller diameter needles and seeds resulted in improved post-PB Day 1 V₁₀₀ and D₉₀ dosimetry, and significantly less acute perineal pain and bruising.     

Subclinical inflammation as a predictor for erectile dysfunction after brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), a marker for subclinical inflammation, has been previously shown to be associated with erectile dysfunction (ED). We studied the potential predictive value of the NLR on ED after prostate brachytherapy (PB) for PCa.METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between July 2005 and January 2021, 842 patients were included in this retrospective study of a prospectively maintained database. ED was assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) physician-reported scale. ED was defined as a Grade 2 or 3 function. NLR count was determined 1–2 months before PB and separated into values PB <2 and ≥2. Patient characteristics and erectile function at last follow-up were compared for patients with a Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the predictive value of baseline NLR ≥2 on post-PB ED.RESULTS: Baseline NLR ≥2 was found to be a statistically significant predictor of post-PB ED on both univariate (p = 0.002) and multivariate analyses (p = 0.008). Furthermore, the difference in ED prevalence between the NLR <2 and NLR ≥2 groups became more pronounced with longer follow-up after PB. The ED rate at 5 years post-PB was 43% for the NLR ≥2 groups, compared to 29% for the NLR <2 groups.CONCLUSIONS: Subclinical systemic inflammation is a potentially important factor for predicting sexual toxicity after pelvic radiotherapy. NLR may be used as a proxy for predicting post-PB ED.     

PSA bounce after prostate brachytherapy with or without neoadjuvant androgen deprivation

PurposeTo assess the impact of PSA bounce (PB) on biochemical failure (BF) and clinical failure (CF) in brachytherapy patients treated with or without neoadjuvant androgen deprivation (AD).Methods and MaterialsFrom 1987 to 2003, 691 patients with clinical stage T1–T3N0M0 prostate cancer were treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost (n = 407), HDR brachytherapy alone (n = 93), or permanent seed implant (n = 191). Three hundred seventeen patients (46%) received neoadjuvant/adjuvant AD with RT. BF was scored using 3 definitions (ASTRO—3 rises, nadir + 2 ng/ml, and threshold 3 ng/ml) based on current and absolute nadir (AN) methodologies. PB was defined as any increase in PSA followed by a decrease to the prior baseline or lower. The median followup was 4.0 years.ResultsForty-six patients (7%) experienced CF at 5 years. PB of ≥0.1, ≥1.0, and ≥2.0 ng/ml at any time after RT occurred in 330 (48%), 60 (9%), and 22 patients (3%) respectively. The use of an AN definition reduced the likelihood of scoring PB as BF across all levels. The patients receiving AD experienced significantly longer bounce duration. Bounce <1.0 ng/ml showed no association with CF. For bounce ≥1.0 ng/ml, 10% demonstrated CF vs. 6% without bounce of this amplitude (p = 0.27). Bounces ≥1.0 ng/ml were more likely to be scored as BFs for definitions based on current nadir (3 rises: 20% vs. 13%, nadir + 2: 43% vs. 11%, 3 at/after nadir: 57% vs. 12%) than those based on AN (3 rises: 8% vs. 10%, nadir + 2: 18% vs. 11%, 3 at/after nadir: 13% vs. 11%).ConclusionsBounces ≥1.0 ng/ml are rare after brachytherapy with or without neoadjuvant AD, occurring in less than 10% of patients. Low PBs have little impact on BF, but as PB amplitude increases, the BF rate increases. BF definitions based on AN are less sensitive to PB after brachytherapy.     

Unusually high prostate-specific antigen bounce after prostate brachytherapy: Searching for etiologic factors

PurposeDetermine whether fat distribution, body mass index, or clinical and dosimetric factors are associated with prostate specific antigen (PSA) bounce (PSAb) of ≥1.6 ng/mL in patients treated with permanent seed ¹²⁵I prostate brachytherapy (PB).Methods and MaterialsWe identified 23 patients with a PSAb of ≥1.6 ng/mL. For each patient with a bounce, at least one control with similar age (age ± 2 years, n = 31) was identified. Control patients had to have no bounce (≤0.2 ng/mL) and a most recent PSA of <1 ng/mL. CT at Day 30 after PB was used to determine the volume of subcutaneous adipose tissue, visceral adipose tissue, and peri-prostatic fat. Univariate and multivariate logistic models were used to assess the association between PSAb and adipose tissue distribution and clinical and dosimetric factors.ResultsMean patient age was 62.3 ± 5.3 years. Mean PSAb height was 2.7 ± 0.8 ng/mL, and mean time to bounce was 9.6 ± 4 months. More than 90% of the patients reached a PSA nadir before PSAb within 12 months post-PB. Patients showing PSAb were more likely to have a T1c disease vs. T2a (odds ratio = 18.87; 95% confidence interval: 2.32–454.55; p = 0.019) and a lower seed activity per cc of prostate volume (odds ratio = 0.02; 95% confidence interval = 0.42–2.22; p = 0.026). Neither fat distribution nor body mass index was associated with PSAb (p = 0.11–0.597).ConclusionsClinical and dosimetric factors play a role in PSAb of ≥1.6 ng/mL. Fat distribution is not associated with a PSAb. There is presently no satisfactory theory to explain the etiology of PSAb.     

Quality of life up to 10 years after external beam radiotherapy and/or brachytherapy for prostate cancer

PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate quality-of-life changes up to 10 years following three different radiotherapy concepts.Methods and MaterialsIn the years 2000–2003, 295 patients were treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT; n = 135; 70.2 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions), low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT with I-125; n = 94; 145 Gy), and high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT with Ir-192; n = 66; 18 Gy in two fractions using 4–6 needles) as a boost to EBRT (50.4 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions). Quality of life was assessed using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite at median time of 2, 6, and 10 years after treatment.ResultsThe urinary function score 2 years after EBRT (mean 93 points) was significantly higher in comparison to HDR-BT + EBRT (80 points, higher doses to the urethra relevant) and LDR-BT (88 points). After 10 years, only HDR-BT + EBRT (75 points) remained worse (LDR-BT 92 points; EBRT 91 points). Urinary incontinence score decreased from 83 to 76 points in the HDR-BT + EBRT group. No significant differences or changes resulted in the bowel domain. The mean sexual function score (i.e., sexuality score) was significantly higher after LDR-BT versus HDR-BT + EBRT and EBRT (30 vs. 19 and 24 points after 2 years and 25 vs. 13 and 15 points after 10 years, respectively)—a lower patient age and a lower percentage with hormonal treatment need to be considered.ConclusionApart from decreasing sexual function for all patients, decreasing urinary scores were found in the HDR-BT + EBRT group predominantly as a result of increasing incontinence. This study demonstrates the need for optimum BT treatment planning.     

Preventive Care: How Mammography Utilization Changes as Women Age

ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of comorbid conditions and age on mammography use.MethodsWe used data from the 2011 to 2015 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, which contained records for 40,752 women over the age of 40. Use was defined as a mammogram within the previous 1 or 2 years, analyzed separately. A logit model was employed to evaluate associations between use and comorbidities and age. Statistical significance was defined by a P < .05 by two-sided test.ResultsOf the 36,575 women in our study sample, 45.9%, 43.6%, 3.9%, and 5.7% reported a history of hypertension (HTN), hyperlipidemia (HLD), prior heart attack (MI), and prior stroke, respectively. Among women without a comorbid condition, there was 47.3% annual mammography use. HTN and HLD were associated with increased use (2.5 and 6.8 percentage points [pp], P< .01). In comparison, prior MI was associated with decreased annual use (−8.2 pp, P < .01). Prior stroke was not significantly associated with annual mammography (−1.5 pp, P = .42). Results were similar for biennial use. The age trend in use showed that the age with maximum screening use was approximately 60 years.DiscussionMammography use was higher in patients with HTN and HLD and lower in patients with prior MI and stroke, which may reflect differences in comorbidity-related general health care use. Use increased until it peaked around age 60. An understanding of how mammography use naturally evolves as people age may help better target specific populations and improve overall use of preventive care.     

Intraprostatic calcification and biochemical recurrence in men treated with cesium-131 prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSEBaseline intraprostatic calcification (IC) has been shown to be associated with a higher rate of biochemical recurrence (BCR) in men treated with iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy (PB). We evaluated this association in a cohort of men treated with cesium-131 PB.METHODS AND MATERIALSWe retrospectively reviewed the charts of all low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients treated with cesium-131 PB +/- external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) at our institution from 2/2011 to 7/2018. Patients with < 24 months of follow up or those who received androgen deprivation therapy were excluded. Baseline IC status (defined as one or more ICs ≥ 5 mm) was determined on post-PB CT scans. Cox analysis was used to assess predictors of BCR and Kaplan–Meier survival curves were calculated.RESULTSTwo hundred and sixteen low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients treated with cesium-131 PB +/- EBRT were included. Median follow up was 56.9 months (range 24.1–111.4). Overall, 76 (35.2%) patients had baseline IC and 140 (64.8%) did not. Baseline disease characteristics did not differ significantly between groups. On univariate Cox analysis, only risk group (p = 0.047) and initial PSA (p = 0.016) were significant predictors of BCR, whereas baseline IC was not (p = 0.11). The 5-year BCR-free survival in patients with versus without baseline IC was 97.7% versus 93.8% (p = 0.405), respectively.CONCLUSIONSIn a cohort of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients treated with cesium-131 PB, the rate of BCR in men with baseline IC was low and baseline IC was not associated with a higher risk of BCR.     

Patient-reported health-related quality of life for men treated with low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy as monotherapy with 125-iodine, 103-palladium,or 131-cesium: Results of a prospective phase II study

PurposeTo compare quality of life (QoL) after brachytherapy with one of the three approved radioactive isotopes.Methods and MaterialsPatients with mostly favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer were treated on this prospective phase II trial with brachytherapy as monotherapy, without hormonal therapy. QoL was recorded at baseline and each follow-up by using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite instrument. The minimal clinically important difference was defined as half the standard deviation of the baseline score for each domain. Mixed effect models were used to compare the different isotopes, and time-driven activity-based costing was used to compute costs.ResultsFrom 2006 to 2013, 300 patients were treated with iodine-125 (I-125, n = 98, prescribed dose [PD] = 145 Gy), palladium-103 (Pd-103, n = 102, PD = 125 Gy), or cesium-131 (Cs-131, n = 100, PD = 115 Gy). Median age was 64.9 years. Median follow-up time was 5.1 years for the entire cohort, and 7.1, 4.8 and 3.3 years for I-125, Pd-103, and Cs-131 groups, respectively. All three isotope groups showed an initial drop in QoL at first follow-up, which gradually improved over the first 2 years for urinary and bowel domains. QoL profiles were similar between I-125 and Pd-103, whereas Cs-131 showed a statistically significant decrease in QoL regarding bowel and sexual function at 12 months compared with Pd-103. However, these differences did not reach the minimal clinically important difference. Compared with I-125, the use of Pd-103 or Cs-131 resulted in cost increases of 18% and 34% respectively.ConclusionsThe three different isotopes produced a similar QoL profile. Statistically significant differences favored Pd-103/I-125 over Cs-131 for bowel and sexual QoL, but this did not reach clinical significance.     

Brachytherapy for penile cancer: Efficacy and impact on sexual function

PurposePenis brachytherapy (PB) remains an alternative in the cancer treatment. The objective of this study was to assess the oncologic outcomes, sexual function, and the sexual behavior of men treated by PB for a cancer of the penis.Methods and MaterialsBetween 1992 and 2009, 47 patients with a cancer of the penis were treated by PB (¹⁹²Ir), in the Toulouse, Montpellier, and Barcelona cancer centers. The investigation into their sexuality was obtained by means of questionnaire. A total of 21 French patients were approached, of whom 19 (mean age = 73.2 years) agreed to answer the questionnaire (participation rate = 90.5%).ResultsOncologic data: The specific survival and the disease-free survival at 5 years was 87.6% (95% confidence interval, 72.4–94.7%) and 84% (95% confidence interval, 57.6–94.7%), respectively. The rate of preservation of the penis was 66% (n = 31). Sexual data: Among the 17 patients sexually active before brachytherapy, 10 patients remained sexually active after treatment (58.8%). Of the 18 patients who had erections before PB, 17 still had them after treatment (94.4%). Age was the main predictive factor.ConclusionThe PB seems to have a moderated impact on the sexual functions and the sexual behavior of the patients.     

Factors impacting all-cause mortality in prostate cancer brachytherapy patients with or without androgen deprivation therapy

PurposeCertain subsets of patients have an increased risk of all-cause mortality when androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is used with definitive radiotherapy. We evaluated the relationship between pretreatment serum testosterone, age, and comorbidities on survival after prostate brachytherapy in men treated with and without ADT.Methods and MaterialsFrom October 2001 to September 2005, 803 patients underwent brachytherapy and 720 had a pretreatment serum testosterone. Comorbidities were prospectively recorded for each patient (body mass index > 30, hypertension, diabetes, current smoker). Median followup was 5.0 years. 34.2% of the patients received ADT. Focus was on subset of men who might be expected to have more significant side effects associated with ADT.ResultsADT did not significantly impact overall survival (OS) in men <65 years, >65 years, with one or no comorbidities, with more than one comorbidity, or with normal/high testosterone level. ADT use in men with low testosterone level was associated with decreased OS (83.6% vs. 93.1%, p = 0.01). The adverse impact of ADT in men with low testosterone level was restricted to men with low testosterone level and more than one comorbidity (OS of 71.3% vs. 92.8%, p < 0.01), with death from cardiovascular diseases accounting for almost all of the excess mortality. The subset of men with multiple comorbidities and normal/high testosterone level did not experience adverse OS with ADT.ConclusionsLow pretreatment testosterone level may be a marker for men at increased risk of premature death with ADT. The combination of low pretreatment serum testosterone level and multiple preexisting comorbidities is associated with decreased OS when ADT is incorporated into treatment.     

Comparison of dose-escalated,image-guided radiotherapy vs. dose-escalated,high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost in a modern cohort of intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients

PurposeWe compared outcomes in intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients treated with dose-escalated adaptive image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) or dose-escalated high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost (HDR-B).Methods and MaterialsPatients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer by National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria were treated with either CT-based off-line adaptive IGRT (n = 734) or HDR-B (n = 282). IGRT was delivered with 3D-conformal or intensity-modulated radiation therapy with a median dose of 77.4 Gy. For HDR-B, the whole pelvis received a median 46 Gy, and the prostate 2 implants of 9.5 Gy (n = 71), 10.5 Gy (n = 155), or 11.5 Gy (n = 56).ResultsMedian followup was 3.7 years for IGRT and 8.0 years for HDR-B (p < 0.001). Eight-year biochemical control was 86% for IGRT and 91% for HDR-B (p = 0.22), disease-free survival 67% for IGRT and 79% for HDR-B (p = 0.006), and overall survival 75% for IGRT and 86% for HDR-B (p = 0.009). Cause-specific survival (8-year, 100% vs. 99%), freedom from distant metastases (98% vs. 97%), and freedom from local recurrence (98% vs. 98%) did not differ (p > 0.50 each). A worse prognosis group was defined by percent positive prostate biopsy cores >50%, perineural invasion, or stage T2b–c, encompassing 260 (35%) IGRT and 171 (61%) HDR-B patients. These patients evidenced a 5-year biochemical control of 96% for HDR-B and 87% for IGRT (p = 0.002).ConclusionsDose-escalated IGRT and HDR-B both yield excellent clinical outcomes for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Improved biochemical control with HDR-B for patients with worse pretreatment characteristics suggests that a subgroup of intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients may benefit from dual-modality treatment.     

Influence of coronary dominance on coronary artery calcification burden

ObjectiveTo evaluate the influence of coronary artery dominance on observed coronary artery calcification burden in outpatients presenting for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA).MethodsA 12-month retrospective review was performed of all CCTAs at a single institution. Coronary arterial dominance, Agatston score and presence or absence of cardiovascular risk factors including hypertension (HTN), hyperlipidemia (HLD), diabetes and smoking were recorded. Dominance groups were compared in terms of calcium score adjusted for covariates using analysis of covariance based on ranks. Only covariates observed to be significant independent predictors of the relevant outcome were included in each analysis. All statistical tests were conducted at the two-sided 5% significance level.Results1223 individuals, 618 women and 605 men were included, mean age 60 years (24–93 years). Right coronary dominance was observed in 91.7% (n = 1109), left dominance in 8% (n = 98), and codominance in 1.3% (n = 16). The distribution of patients among Agatston score severity categories significantly differed between codominant and left (p = 0.008), and codominant and right (p = 0.022) groups, with higher prevalence of either zero or severe CAC in the codominant patients. There was no significant difference in Agatston score between dominance groups. In the subset of individuals with coronary artery calcification, Agatston score was significantly higher in codominant versus left dominant patients (mean Agatston score 595 ± 520 vs. mean 289 ± 607, respectively; p = 0.049), with a trend towards higher scores in comparison to the right-dominant group (p = 0.093). Significance was not maintained upon adjustment for covariates.ConclusionsWhile the distribution of Agatston score severity categories differed in codominant versus right- or left-dominant patients, there was no significant difference in Agatston score based on coronary dominance pattern in our cohort. Reporting and inclusion of codominant subsets in larger investigations may elucidate whether codominant anatomy is associated with differing risk.     

Phase II trial of image-based high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for previously irradiated gynecologic cancer

PurposeTo report the disease-free Grade ≥3 complication-free survival of a Phase II protocol of reirradiation with high-dose-rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy (ITB) in previously irradiated gynecologic cancer.Methods and MaterialsFifteen patients with previously irradiated cervical (n = 6), endometrial (n = 6), and vulvovaginal tumors (n = 3) were treated with HDR-ITB alone to a median dose of 38 Gy in 8 b.i.d. fractions over 4 consecutive days. Prior treatments included surgery (n = 12; 80%), external irradiation (n = 15; 100%), and brachytherapy (n = 9; 60%). Average clinical target volume Size was 60.9 cc (range, 14.8–165.3 cc), and median time to reirradiation was 3.9 years (range, 0.4–22.7 years).ResultsWith a median followup of 2.8 years (range, 1.2–9.2 years), 3 patients (20.0%) developed Grade ≥3 toxicity consisting of Grade 3 intestinal obstruction (n = 1), Grade 4 rectovesical fistula (n = 1), and Grade 5 intestinal obstruction (n = 1). Six patients remain alive and without evidence of disease at last followup. Two patients are alive with disease progression, and 7 patients have died, 4 of them from disease progression and 3 from other causes. The 2-year disease-free Grade ≥3 complication-free survival was 40%.ConclusionsHDR-ITB alone is a reasonable salvage treatment option in a significant number of patients with previously irradiated gynecologic tumors.     

Prostate-specific antigen bounce after high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy and hypofractionated external beam radiotherapy

PurposeTo report the frequency, timing, and magnitude of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) bounce (PB) in patients who received high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (HDRB) plus hypofractionated external beam radiation therapy (HypoRT) and to assess a possible correlation between PB and biochemical failure (BF).Methods and MaterialsPatients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer received 10 Gy single-fraction ¹⁹²Ir HDRB followed by 50 Gy in 20 daily fractions of HypoRT without androgen deprivation therapy. All patients had a minimum 2-year followup. The PB was defined as PSA elevation higher than 0.2 ng/mL from previous measurement with subsequent drop to pre-bounce level. The BF was defined as PSA nadir + 2 ng/mL.ResultsA total of 114 patients treated between 2001 and 2009 were eligible for analysis. At a median followup of 66 months, the PB was found in 45 (39%) patients with a median time to bounce of 16 months (range, 3–76 months). The median time to PSA normalization after a PB was 9 months (range, 2–40 months). The median magnitude of PB was 0.45 ng/mL (range, 0.2–6.62). The BF occurred in 12 (10.5%) patients of whom three had a PB. Median time to BF was 52.5 months. Four patients (3.5%) in the PB group fit the criteria for BF.ConclusionsThe PB is common after HDRB and HypoRT and can occur up to 76 months after treatment. It can rarely fit the criteria for BF. The time to PB is shorter than the time to BF. There is a lower incidence of BF in patients with a PB. An acknowledgment of this phenomenon should be made when interpreting PSA results during followup to prevent unnecessary interventions.     

An age-corrected matched-pair study of erectile function in patients treated with dose-escalated adaptive image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy vs. high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer

PurposeTo compare erectile dysfunction (ED) after adaptive dose-escalated image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT) and high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR) monotherapy.Methods and MaterialsLow- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients treated with IG-IMRT or HDR were matched on pretreatment ED, age, Gleason score, T-stage, and prostate specific antigen. Patients who received androgen deprivation therapy were excluded. ED was graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4. Actuarial rates of ED were computed by the Kaplan–Meier method.ResultsThere were 384 patients with median followup of 2.0 years (0.5–6.1) for IG-IMRT and 2.0 years (0.5–8.7) for HDR. The median IG-IMRT dose was 75.6 Gy and HDR dose 38 Gy in four fractions. For patients with no pretreatment ED, actuarial rates of requiring intervention (Grade ≥2 ED) at 3 years were 31% for IG-IMRT and 19% for HDR (p = 0.23), and impotence despite medical intervention (Grade 3) were 0% for IG-IMRT and 6% for HDR (p = 0.06). For patients with Grade 1 pretreatment ED, Grade ≥2 ED at 3 years were 47% for IG-IMRT and 34% for HDR (p = 0.79), and Grade 3 ED were 15% in both groups (p = 0.59). For patients with Grade 2 pretreatment ED, Grade 3 ED at 3 years were 22% for IG-IMRT and 37% for HDR (p = 0.70). No variables were predictive of Grade ≥2 ED following treatment.ConclusionsRates of ED requiring medical intervention for both IG-IMRT and HDR are low and equivalent. Even patients with ED before treatment are likely to maintain potency with medication use at 3 years following treatment.     

Prolonged hormonal therapy and external beam radiation independently increase the risk of Persistent Hypogonadism in men treated with prostate brachytherapy

PurposeTo identify variables that predict persistent hypogonadism and castration in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) treated with brachytherapy (BT).Materials and MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on 1,053 patients receiving BT ± external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) ± hormone therapy (HT) for NCCN low, intermediate, or high-risk PCa between 1990 and 2011. Patients were categorized as not receiving HT (n = 438, 41.6%), ≤6 months (n = 317, 31.1%) or > 6 months (n = 298, 28.3%) of HT. 572 (54.3%) received BT alone, and 481 had combination therapy. The five- and 10-year freedom from persistent hypogonadism (T < 280 ng/dL) and castration (T < 50 ng/dL) for each group was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier estimates. Multivariable cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the risk of persistent hypogonadism and castration at a median followup of 6.5 years (posttreatment to final T) (IQR: 4.3–9.1 years; range: 1.0–19.2 years).ResultsThe 5-year freedom from hypogonadism rates were 92.4%, 88.9%, and 87.0% for patients with no HT, ≤ 6 months and >6 months of HT, respectively (10-year rates: 66.7%, 55.3%, 40.5%); p < 0.01. The 5-year freedom from castration rates were 99.2%, 98.0%, and 98.4%, respectively (10-year rates: 97.9%, 95.5%, 90.9%); p = 0.078. Number of months of HT (HR = 1.04, p = 0.030) and BT with EBRT vs. BT alone (HR = 1.56, p = 0.010) significantly increased the risk of persistent hypogonadism. Number of months of HT was the only variable which increased the risk of persistent castration (HR = 1.09, p = 0.014).ConclusionsThe addition of EBRT to BT is an independent risk factor for persistent hypogonadism. Prolonged HT additionally increases the risk of persistent hypogonadism and castration.     

Coronary atherosclerosis scoring with semiquantitative CCTA risk scores for prediction of major adverse cardiac events: Propensity score-based analysis of diabetic and non-diabetic patients

AimsWe aimed to compare semiquantitative coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) risk scores – which score presence, extent, composition, stenosis and/or location of coronary artery disease (CAD) – and their prognostic value between patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM). Risk scores derived from general chest-pain populations are often challenging to apply in DM patients, because of numerous confounders.MethodsOut of a combined cohort from the Leiden University Medical Center and the CONFIRM registry with 5-year follow-up data, we performed a secondary analysis in diabetic patients with suspected CAD who were clinically referred for CCTA. A total of 732 DM patients was 1:1 propensity-matched with 732 non-DM patients by age, sex and cardiovascular risk factors. A subset of 7 semiquantitative CCTA risk scores was compared between groups: 1) any stenosis ≥50%, 2) any stenosis ≥70%, 3) stenosis-severity component of the coronary artery disease-reporting and data system (CAD-RADS), 4) segment involvement score (SIS), 5) segment stenosis score (SSS), 6) CT-adapted Leaman score (CT-LeSc), and 7) Leiden CCTA risk score. Cox-regression analysis was performed to assess the association between the scores and the primary endpoint of all-cause death and non-fatal myocardial infarction. Also, area under the receiver-operating characteristics curves were compared to evaluate discriminatory ability.ResultsA total of 1,464 DM and non-DM patients (mean age 58 ± 12 years, 40% women) underwent CCTA and 155 (11%) events were documented after median follow-up of 5.1 years. In DM patients, the 7 semiquantitative CCTA risk scores were significantly more prevalent or higher as compared to non-DM patients (p ≤ 0.022). All scores were independently associated with the primary endpoint in both patients with and without DM (p ≤ 0.020), with non-significant interaction between the scores and diabetes (interaction p ≥ 0.109). Discriminatory ability of the Leiden CCTA risk score in DM patients was significantly better than any stenosis ≥50% and ≥70% (p = 0.003 and p = 0.007, respectively), but comparable to the CAD-RADS, SIS, SSS and CT-LeSc that also focus on the extent of CAD (p ≥ 0.265).ConclusionCoronary atherosclerosis scoring with semiquantitative CCTA risk scores incorporating the total extent of CAD discriminate major adverse cardiac events well, and might be useful for risk stratification of patients with DM beyond the binary evaluation of obstructive stenosis alone.     

Evaluation of the “Quadrella” at 3 years: New index to assess functional and oncological performance specific to prostate brachytherapy

Purpose“Quadrella” index has been recently developed to assess oncological and functional outcomes after prostate brachytherapy (PB). We aimed to evaluate this index at 1, 2, and 3 years, using validated questionnaires, assessed prospectively.Methods and MaterialsFrom 08/2007 to 01/2013, 193 patients underwent ¹²⁵Iodine PB for low-risk or favorable intermediate-risk prostate adenocarcinoma. Inclusion criteria were as follows: no incontinence (International Continence Society Index initial score = 0) and good erectile function (International Index of Erectile Function–5 items: >16). One hundred patients were included (mean age: 64 y). Postimplantation intake of phosphodiesterase inhibitors was not considered as failure. The “Quadrella” index was defined by the absence of biochemical recurrence (Phoenix criteria), significant erectile dysfunction (ED) (Index of Erectile Function–5 items: >16), urinary toxicity (UT) (International Prostate Score Symptom [IPSS] <15 or IPSS> 15 with ΔIPSS <5), and rectal toxicity (RT) (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group = 0).ResultsAt 12 months, 90 patients were evaluable: 42/90 (46.7%) achieved Quadrella. The main criteria for failure were as follows: ED in 77.1% (37/48) of cases, RT in 20.8% (10/48) of cases, and UT in 12.5% (9/57) of cases. At 24 and 36 months, 59.3% (48/81) and 61.1% (44/72) of patients achieved Quadrella, respectively. The main cause of failure was ED in 69.7% (23/33) and 85.7% (24/28) of cases, while RT was involved in 21.2% (7/33) and in 3.6% (1/28) of cases, and UT in 9.1% (3/33) and 3.6% (1/28) of cases. Only one case of biochemical recurrence was observed (i.e., 1/28 = 3.6% at 3 y).ConclusionsThe Quadrella can be used at 1, 2, and 3 years after PB. It allows to take into account the urinary and RT specific to PB. ED was the main cause of failure. This index will be useful to assess midterm and long-term results.     

Impact of small prostate size on postimplant prostate dosimetry: Analysis of a large community database

PurposeAchieving high-quality permanent interstitial brachytherapy in smaller prostates is thought to be more difficult than in larger glands. This study evaluates 4547 implants in a large community database to test this hypothesis.Methods and MaterialsFrom January 2003 to October 2010, 4547 prostate brachytherapy implants from a large community database were analyzed. The cohort was divided into three groups based on size, namely smaller (<30 cm³, n = 1301), medium (30–40 cm³, n = 1861), and large (>40 cm³, n = 1385). Postimplant dosimetry, including D₉₀, V₁₀₀, and V₁₀₀ by prostate sector, was performed for each implant. Comparison of mean V₁₀₀ among small, medium, and larger prostate volume cohorts was performed using a one-way analysis of variance test.ResultsFor the overall cohort, the D₉₀ was 105% and 104% for monotherapy and boost, respectively. Mean D₉₀ for small prostates was 106% and 104% for monotherapy and boost, respectively. Mean V₁₀₀ for small prostates was 91.1% and 90.0%, respectively. Coverage for small prostates was as good or slightly better than larger glands. V₁₀₀ by prostate sector revealed that there were no sectors for which smaller glands had significantly inferior coverage compared with larger glands.ConclusionAlthough smaller prostates may in some respects be more technically difficult to implant than larger glands, a review of community-based brachytherapists reveals that with current implant techniques, good quality implants are readily achievable in men with smaller glands.     

Brachytherapy provides comparable outcomes and improved cost-effectiveness in the treatment of low/intermediate prostate cancer

PurposeTo evaluate the cost-effectiveness and outcomes of low-dose-rate (LDR) and high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy compared with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with low/intermediate risk of prostate cancer.Methods and MaterialsOne thousand three hundred twenty-eight patients with low or intermediate risk of prostate cancer were treated with LDR (n = 207), HDR with four fractions (n = 252), or IMRT (n = 869) between January 1992 and December 2008. LDR patients were treated with palladium seeds to a median dose of 120 Gy, whereas HDR patients were treated to a median dose 38.0 Gy (four fractions). IMRT patients received 42–44 fractions with a median dose of 75.6 Gy. Clinical outcomes were compared, including biochemical failure, cause-specific survival, and overall survival.ResultsOverall, no differences in 5-year biochemical control (BC) or cause-specific survival were noted among treatment modalities. The calculated reimbursement for LDR brachytherapy, HDR brachytherapy with four fractions, and IMRT was $9,938; $17,514; and $29,356, respectively. HDR and LDR brachytherapy were statistically less costly to Medicare and the institution than IMRT (p < 0.001), and LDR brachytherapy was less costly than HDR brachytherapy (p = 0.01 and p < 0.001). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for cost to Medicare for BC with IMRT were $4045 and $2754 per percent of BC for LDR and HDR brachytherapy, respectively. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio using institutional cost comparing IMRT with LDR and HDR brachytherapy was $4962 and $4824 per 1% improvement in BC.ConclusionsIn this study of patients with low and intermediate risk of prostate cancer, comparable outcomes at 5 years were noted between modalities with increased costs associated with IMRT.