Combined Estrogen Receptor and Progesterone Receptor Level Can Predict Survival Outcome in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-positive Early Breast Cancer

BackgroundIn human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer, emerging evidence imply that clinical behaviors differ according to hormone receptor (HR) status. However, there is no conclusion about the relevance between estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PR) expression and clinical outcome of HER2+ breast cancer. Our study aimed to determine the influence of different ER/PR levels on survival outcome of HER2+ early breast cancer.Patients and MethodsNine hundred and nineteen early HER2+ breast cancer patients treated between 2009 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed and HR+/HER2+ patients were further divided based on ER level (Low/L: 1%-9%; Median/M: 10%-79%; High/H: 80%-100%) and PR level (Low/L: 0%-19%; High/H: 20%-100%) according to restricted cubic spline (RCS) smoothing curve. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by Kaplan–Meier method and log rank test.ResultsFour hundred and forty two HR+/HER2+ and 477 HR-/HER2+ breast cancer patients were included in our study and 73.2% received target therapy (HR+ 69.7%, HR- 76.5%). While HR+/HER2+ breast cancer showed better survival than HR-/HER2+ subtype in 5-year disease free survival (DFS, 93.0% vs. 86.8%, P < .001), no significant difference was observed between DFS in ER+/PR+ and ER+/PR- subgroup (94.4% vs. 90.4%, P = .22). However, a potential correlation was found between ER/PR levels and DFS in HR+/HER2+ (P = .074) tumors. In HR+/HER2+ breast cancer, all subgroups showed DFS improvement trend versus M-ER/L-PR. In all HER2+ patients, hazard ratio of H-ER/H-PR compared with HR- subtype was 0.10 (95%CI 0.01-0.74, P = .024) in all patients and 0.14 (95%CI, 0.02-1.02, P = .053) in patients receiving anti-HER2 therapy.ConclusionER/PR expression may become a predictor of survival benefit in HER2+ early breast cancer and a higher ER/PR level might be associated with better DFS.     

Association of Molecular Profiles and Mutational Status With Distinct Histological Lung Adenocarcinoma Subtypes. An Analysis of the LACE-Bio Data

BackgroundAdjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is indicated for stage II and stage III lung adenocarcinomas (ADC). Using the LACE Bio II database, we analyzed the distribution of various mutations across the subtypes of ADCs and studied the prognostic and predictive roles of PD-L1, TMB, and Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs).Materials and MethodsClinical and genomic data from the LACE Bio II data were extracted. Patients were divided into ADC subtypes, in which the grouping was done based on their known clinical behavior (Lepidic [LEP], Acinar/Papillary [ACI or PAP], Micropapillary/Solid [MIP or SOL], Mucinous [MUC] and Others). Kaplan-Meier (KM) and log-rank test were used to compare survival based on PD-L1, TMB, TILs and combinations of TMB with PD-L1 and TILs. Adjusted Hazard Ratios (HR) were analyzed with Overall Survival (OS), Disease-Free Survival (DFS) and Lung Cancer-Specific Survival (LCSS) as endpoints.ResultsA total of 375 ADC patients were identified. MIP/SOL was the subtype most commonly positive for various biomarkers. PD-L1 Negative/high TMB was associated with better outcomes in terms of OS (HR = 0.46 [0.23-0.89], P = .021) and DFS (HR = 0.52 [0.30-0.90], P = .02), relative to PD-L1 Negative/low TMB. High TMB predicted worse outcome with AC use in terms of OS (ratio of hazard ratio rHR = 2.75 [1.07-7.04], P = .035). Marked TILs had better outcome with AC for DFS (rHR = 0.22 [0.06-0.87], P = .031 and LCSS (rHR = 0.08 [0.01-0.66], P = .019) respectively. There was also a beneficial effect of AC among patients with Marked TILs/low TMB in terms of DFS (rHR = 0.06 [0.01-0.53], P = .011).ConclusionHigh TMB has a prognostic role in resectable lung ADC. The high TMB group had a poor outcome with AC, suggesting that this group may be better served with immune checkpoint therapy.     

Sinusal localization of nodal micrometastases is a prognostic factor in breast cancer

BackgroundBreast cancer micrometastases are frequently found during pathological examination of sentinel lymph nodes and complete axillary lymph node dissection. Despite this, their clinical relevance is still debated. The aim of this study is to investigate features that affect disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with nodal micrometastases from breast cancer.Material and methodsWe retrospectively investigated the outcome of 122 patients with nodal micrometastases from breast cancer followed up for 60 months.ResultsAt univariate analysis, worse DFS was related to features of primary tumor (multifocality P = 0.002; size >2 cm, P = 0.022; grade P = 0.022; absence of estrogen P < 0.001 and progesterone P < 0.001 receptors; HER-2 overexpression P = 0.006; vascular invasion P = 0.039; proliferative fraction ≥20% P = 0.034) and micrometastases (sinusal localization P = 0.010). Among the above-mentioned features, two were strongly associated with worse DFS in the multivariate model, i.e. negative receptorial status [hazard ratio (HR) = 11.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.06–31.09; P < 0.001] and sinusal localization of micrometastasis (HR = 3.66, 1.18–11.36; P = 0.025). The OS was influenced by multifocality (P < 0.001) and receptor status (P = 0.005).ConclusionOur results indicate that in patients affected by breast cancer, in addition to the well-known pathological features of primary tumor, sinusal localization of micrometastasis strongly impacts on the prognosis.     

Impact of Tumor Location on Patient Outcomes in Small Bowel Cancers

BackgroundSmall bowel cancers are rare gastrointestinal malignancies and tumor location impact on outcomes is unclear.Material and MethodsA retrospective review was performed on stage I to IV small bowel cancer cases from 2000 to 2017 in British Columbia, Canada. Baseline patient characteristics, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by tumor location and systemic therapy use patterns were summarized.ResultsOf 340 patients included, primary tumor distribution was: duodenum (51.2%), ileum (19.1%), jejunum (18.5%), and unspecified (11.2%). Median DFS for stage I to III disease was 37.7, 49.1, and 26.7 months for duodenal, jejunal, and ileal tumors (P = .018). Median OS was 9.6, 35.2, and 20.1 months for duodenal, jejunal, and ileal tumors (P < .0001). Compared to duodenal primaries, both jejunal and ileal tumors were associated with significantly improved OS (HR 0.43, P < .001 for jejunal; HR 0.71, P = .035 for ileal). Adjuvant therapy was given to 21.6% of stage II and 50.6% of stage III cancers. Among patients with metastatic disease, median OS was 4.2, 11.4, and 6.9 months for duodenal, jejunal, and ileal tumors (P = .0019). Jejunal tumors had the best prognosis (HR 0.48, P = .001 vs. duodenum).ConclusionSurvival differences exist when small bowel cancers were assessed by tumor location, and jejunal tumors portended better prognosis overall.     

The impact of anthracyclines in intermediate and high-risk HER2-negative early breast cancer—a pooled analysis of the randomised clinical trials PlanB and SUCCESS C

Background Anthracycline/cyclophosphamide-taxane-containing chemotherapy (AC-T) is the standard of care in the adjuvant treatment of HER2-negative early breast cancer (EBC), but recent studies suggest omission of anthracyclines for reduced toxicity without compromising efficacy.Methods Based on individual patient data (n = 5924) pooled from the randomised Phase III trials PlanB and SUCCESS C, we compared disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between intermediate to high-risk HER2-negative EBC-patients treated with either six cycles of docetaxel/cyclophosphamide (TC6) or an AC-T regime using univariable and adjusted multivariable Cox regression models.Results AC-T conferred no significant DFS or OS advantage in univariable (DFS: hazard ratio (HR) for TC vs. AT 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.89–1.24, P = 0.57; OS: HR 1.00, 95% CI: 0.80–1.26, P = 1.00) and adjusted multivariable analysis (DFS: HR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.86–1.19, P = 0.91; OS: HR 0.97, 95% CI: 0.77–1.22, P = 0.79). Patients receiving TC6 had significantly fewer grade 3–4 adverse events. Exploratory subgroup analysis showed that AC-T was associated with significantly better DFS and OS in pN2/3 patients, specifically in those with lobular histology.Conclusion For most patients with HER2-negative EBC, AC-T is not associated with a survival benefit compared to TC6. However, patients with lobular pN2/pN3 tumours seem to benefit from anthracycline-containing chemotherapy.Subject terms: Randomized controlled trials, Breast cancer     

CAPOX Associated With Toxicities of Higher Grade but Improved Disease-Free Survival When Compared With FOLFOX in the Adjuvant Treatment of Stage III Colon Cancer

Introduction/BackgroundAdjuvant treatment of colon cancer relies on fluoropyrimidine-containing regimens as the intravenous formulation, 5-FU, or its oral prodrug, CA, combined with oxaliplatin (FOLFOX and CAPOX). There is currently no clinical trial comparing the 2 regimens; however, both are considered standard of care treatment options.Materials and MethodsWe performed a retrospective chart review comparing average relative dose intensity (ARDI), percentage of intended total dose (PITD), overall survival (OS), DFS, and toxicity profiles of these regimens. The patients (n = 176) received either modified FOLFOX6 (n = 93) or CAPOX (n = 83).ResultsOxaliplatin ARDI (80.72% vs. 87.11%; P = .0033) and PITD (70.09% vs. 88.11%; P = .0013) was significantly lower in those treated with CAPOX compared with FOLFOX. CA ARDI (87.10% vs. 93.60%; P < .0001) and PITD (77.19% vs. 88.11%; P = .0006) was significantly lower than 5-FU dosing. Patients treated with CAPOX had more ≥ Grade 2 toxicities and trended toward more dose-limiting toxicities. Survival analysis demonstrated a trend toward improved OS with CAPOX (hazard ratio [HR], 0.4741; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.1660-1.354; P = .1663) and improved DFS with CAPOX (HR, 0.4949; 95% CI, 0.2512-0.9749; P = .0420). Multivariate analysis demonstrated similar results with CAPOX being associated with a trend toward improved OS (HR, 0.396; 95% CI, 0.110-1.429; P = .1571) and DFS (HR, 0.458; 95% CI, 0.210-1.001; P = .0504).ConclusionPatients receiving CAPOX had significantly lower ARDI and PITD compared with FOLFOX, but showed trends toward improved outcomes when treated with CAPOX in the adjuvant setting when compared with FOLFOX.     

Capecitabine in early breast cancer: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

PurposeCapecitabine is an effective therapy for metastatic breast cancer. Its role in early breast cancer is uncertain due to conflicting data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs).MethodsPubMed and major conference proceedings were searched to identify RCTs comparing standard chemotherapy with or without capecitabine in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting. Hazard ratios (HRs) for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), as well as odds ratios (ORs) for toxicities were extracted or calculated and pooled in a meta-analysis. Subgroup analysis compared triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) to non-TNBC and whether capecitabine was given in addition to or in place of standard chemotherapy. Meta-regression was used to explore the influence of TNBC on OS.ResultsEight studies comprising 9302 patients were included. In unselected patients, capecitabine did not influence DFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.99, p = 0.93) or OS (HR 0.90, p = 0.36). There was a significant difference in DFS when capecitabine was given in addition to standard treatment compared with in place of standard treatment (HR 0.92 versus 1.62, interaction p = 0.002). Addition of capecitabine to standard chemotherapy was associated with significantly improved DFS in TNBC versus non-TNBC (HR 0.72 versus 1.01, interaction p = 0.02). Meta-regression showed that adding capecitabine to standard chemotherapy was associated with improved OS in studies with higher proportions of patients with TNBC (R = −0.967, p = 0.007). Capecitabine increased grade 3/4 diarrhoea (odds ratio [OR] 2.33, p < 0.001) and hand-foot syndrome (OR 8.08, p < 0.001), and resulted in more frequent treatment discontinuation (OR 3.80, p < 0.001).ConclusionAdding capecitabine to standard chemotherapy appears to improve DFS and OS in TNBC, but increases adverse events in keeping with its known toxicity profile.     

Effect of obesity on disease-free and overall survival in node-positive breast cancer patients in a large French population: A pooled analysis of two randomised trials

BackgroundTo examine the association between baseline body mass index (BMI), and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in a large French early-stage breast cancer population included in the UNICANCER Programme d’Action Concerté Sein-01 (PACS01) and PACS04 phase III randomised trials.MethodsAfter a median follow-up of 5.9 years, this report analyses 4996 patients with node-positive breast cancer, and randomly assigned to adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy combined or not with taxanes. Univariate analyses were used to study the effects of well known prognostic factors and BMI on DFS and OS. BMI was obtained at baseline, before chemotherapy initiation, and obesity was defined as a BMI ⩾ 30 kg/m². Cox proportional hazards regression models were secondly used to assess the influence of BMI after adjusting for other factors. Exhaustive analysis of the dose intensity delivered was also studied for comparison between obese and non-obese patients.ResultsObese patients initially present with more advanced disease at diagnosis compared to non-obese patients. By univariate analysis, obesity was moderately associated with poorer DFS (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.18 [1.01–1.39] P = 0.04), but mostly with poorer OS (HR = 1.38 [1.13–1.69] P = 0.002). Delivered dose intensity of anthracyclines and taxanes was not significantly different between obese and non-obese patients. After adjustment for disease characteristics, BMI had no influence either on DFS or OS.ConclusionThis report suggests that in a French population, obesity has no impact on breast cancer prognosis when modern adjuvant chemotherapy, at the appropriate dose intensity, is delivered.     

Omission of Chemotherapy in HR+/HER2− Early Invasive Breast Cancer Based on Combined 6-IHC Score?

PurposeCurrent methods of judging whether HR+/HER2− breast cancer (BC) require adjuvant therapy, such as Ki67 and multigene prognostic tests, cannot balance accuracy with the price most patients can afford.MethodsA retrospective analysis of 330 HR+/HER2− BC patients was conducted. Six BC-related genes (Cathepsin L2, MMP11, CyclinB1, Aurora A, Survivin, and Ki67) were screened using univariate and multivariate COX regression, and correlate clinical follow-up with immunohistochemical expression (designated as 6-IHC). All the included patients were divided randomly at a 7:3 ratio into training and testing cohorts. The cutoff prognosis index (PI) of 6-IHC was determined by multivariate Cox risk regression analysis after calculating the PI of each patient in training cohort and confirmed in testing cohort. Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to analyze Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Six-IHC score and other factors associated with survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy were compared with Ki67 index.ResultsThe receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the patients can be divided into 6-IHC score “High” and “Low” risk groups. The 8-year DFS and OS of the KM curves showed that chemotherapy did not significantly improve the DFS in the 6-IHC score “Low” risk group (P= 0.830), but significantly improved the DFS in the 6-IHC score “High” risk group (P = 0.012).ConclusionsCombined 6-IHC score could be a reliable tool in predicting cancer-specific recurrences and survival in HR+/HER2-breast cancer patients, with additional advantages over using immunohistochemical expression of Ki67.     

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation Improves Disease-Free Survival Compared to Pediatric-Inspired Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster Chemotherapy in Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

IntroductionAcute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a malign disease with poor prognosis in adults. After remission is achieved by induction therapy, administration of allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (AHSCT) is one of the standard treatment in adult ALL patients. Pediatric-inspired chemotherapy has been demonstrated to improve outcomes of adult ALL. The aim of this study was to compare the Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster-95 chemotherapy (BFM-95) regimen and AHSCT results in ALL patients with first complete remission.Patients and MethodsForty-seven patients who received the BFM-95 regimen and 83 patients who underwent AHSCT were compared. Primary endpoints were comparison of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between groups.ResultsThere was no significant difference between the groups in terms of age, gender, or performance status. In BFM-95 and AHSCT, relapsed disease occurred in 11 (23.4%) and 24 (28.9%), respectively; the respective values for treatment-related mortality were 6 (12.7%) and 10 (12%) (P = .32 and .91). Five-year DFS was 38% with BFM-95 and 57% with AHSCT (P = .014). There was no 5-year OS difference in both groups (64% vs 60%, P = .13). While leukocyte count < 30 × 10⁹/L at the time of diagnosis (hazard ratio, 2.7; P = .021) and prophylaxis of central nervous system (hazard ratio, 2; P = .036) were prognostic for OS, the only factor that had a prognostic effect on DFS was AHSCT (hazard ratio, 1.6; P = .041).ConclusionAHSCT currently offers no special OS advantage but increases DFS compared to the BFM-95 regimen. AHSCT may be considered at first complete remission in patients at low risk of transplant-related mortality.     

Reproductive Factors and Subtypes of Breast Cancer Defined by Estrogen Receptor,Progesterone Receptor,and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2: A Register-Based Study From Korea

BackgroundThe relationship between reproductive breast risk factors and breast cancer survival in patients with different breast cancer subtypes is not well known.MethodsWe examined a large-sized, retrospective study of 23,882 subjects from the Korean Breast Cancer Registry. The breast cancer subtype was determined by immunohistochemical staining for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Information regarding reproductive factors, including breastfeeding, age at first birth (AFB), and parity, was gathered. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to estimate the association among breast cancer subtypes, such as luminal A, luminal B, Her-2/neu overexpressing, and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), and breast cancer survival as dependent variables and adjusting for age and stage.ResultsHigh parity (≥ 5) increased the recurrence risk of luminal A and B breast cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 1.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96-3.97; P = .0055 and HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.42-3.02, respectively; P = .0073) in breast cancer–specific survival (BCSS), but 1 to 3 child births decreased the recurrence risk of luminal A breast cancer (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.34-0.91; P = .0055) and luminal B breast cancer (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.17-0.61; P = .0073) in BCSS. Early AFB (< 20 years) increased the recurrence risk of luminal A breast cancers (HR, 1.61; 95% CI, 0.62-4.26; P = .039) in BCSS and of TNBC (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.78-2.21; P = .0006) in overall survival. Her-2/neu overexpressing breast cancer had no correlation with parity and AFB in breast cancer survival.ConclusionsHigh parity (≥ 5) and early AFB (< 20 years) were correlated with worse clinical outcomes in patients with luminal breast cancer, but not with other subtyped breast cancers.     

Tumor Volume Is a Better Prognostic Factor than Greatest Tumor Diameter in Operated Stage I-III Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

IntroductionThe aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of tumor volume (TV, recorded from surgical specimens) on patients with stage I-III non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after complete resection.Materials and MethodsA total of 129 patients with stage I-III NSCLC diagnosed and underwent curative resection from 2007 to 2014 in our center were included in the study. Their clinico-pathological factors were retrospectively reviewed. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) analyses were performed with the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox's hazard model. According to the ROC analysis, patients were divided into 2 groups (Group 1: 58 patients <30.3 cm³ and Group 2: 71 patients ≥30.3 cm³) and the OS and DFS values were compared.ResultsMedian TVs and greatest tumor diameter were 12 cm³ (0.1-30) / 3 cm (0.4-6.5) in Group 1 and 98 cm³ (30.6-1521) / 6 cm (3.5-21) in Group 2. Median OS was 53 (5-177) months in Group 1 and 38 (2-200) months in Group 2 (P < .001). DFS was similar in both group (28 [1-140] vs. 24 [1-155] months, Introduction P = .489). Kaplan-Meier curves showed significantly higher OS rates in Group 1 than Group 2 (P = .04). In multivariable analysis (TV, tumor T stage, tumor N stage, receiving adjuvant radiotherapy) showed that TV (HR: 0.293, 95% CI: 0.121-0.707, P = .006) and tumor N stage (HR: 0.013, 95% CI: 0.001-0.191, P = .02) were independent factors associated with OS.ConclusionTumor volume, not considered in the routine TNM classification, may improve prediction accuracy of overall OS in operated Stage I-III NSCLC.     

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With FLT3-ITD Mutated AML: Transplantation in CR1 Is the Decisive Factor for Good Outcome

BackgroundPatients with internal tandem duplication in fms-related tyrosine kinase receptor gene 3 (FLT3-ITD)-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have a dismal prognosis and the only curative option seems to be allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). However, its timing is still matter of debate.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 73 consecutive AML patients with FLT3-ITD (median age 53, range 20-68 years) allografted with consistent policy to try to refer them all for upfront alloSCT in first complete remission (CR1).ResultsWith a median follow-up of 44 (range, 5-135) months the 5-year overall survival (OS)/disease-free survival (DFS) probabilities were 49%/47%. The cumulative incidence of relapse and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) were 37% and 14%, respectively. The estimated 5-year OS for patients who received transplantation in CR1 was 62% versus 0% for patients who received transplantation beyond CR1. Multivariable analysis identified stem cell transplantation beyond CR1 as the key factor for poor OS (hazard ratio [HR], 5.41; P < .0001), DFS (HR, 4.41; P = .0002), and high relapse incidence (HR, 8.08; P < .0001). Acute graft versus host disease Grade ≥3 predicted higher NRM (HR, 3.80; P = .059) as well as inferior OS (HR, 2.04; P = .0079). No association of patient age, nucleophosmin status, donor type, conditioning, and other variables on the survival was detected.ConclusionAlloSCT should be regarded with urgency as soon as CR1 is achieved in this subset of AML patients.     

Disease-free and overall survival at 3.5 years for neoadjuvant bevacizumab added to docetaxel followed by fluorouracil,epirubicin and cyclophosphamide,for women with HER2 negative early breast cancer: ARTemis Trial

BackgroundThe ARTemis trial previously reported that addition of neoadjuvant bevacizumab (Bev) to docetaxel (D) followed by fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (D-FEC) in HER2 negative breast cancer improved the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. We present disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) with central pathology review.Patients and methodsPatients were randomized to 3 cycles of D followed by 3 cycles of FEC (D-FEC), ±4 cycles of Bev (Bev + D-FEC). DFS and OS were analyzed by treatment and by central pathology reviewed pCR and Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) class.ResultsA total of 800 patients were randomized [median follow-up 3.5 years (IQR 3.2–4.4)]. DFS and OS were similar across treatment arms [DFS hazard ratio (HR)=1.18 (95% CI 0.89–1.57), P = 0.25; OS HR = 1.26 (95% CI 0.90–1.76), P = 0.19). Both local pathology report review and central histopathology review confirmed a significant improvement in DFS and OS for patients who achieved a pCR [DFS HR = 0.38 (95% CI 0.23–0.63), P < 0.001; OS HR = 0.43 (95% CI 0.24–0.75), P = 0.003]. However, significant heterogeneity was observed (P = 0.02); larger improvements in DFS were obtained with a pCR achieved with D-FEC than a pCR achieved with Bev + D-FEC. As RCB class increased, significantly worse DFS and OS was observed (P for trend <0.0001), which effect was most marked in the ER negative group.ConclusionsThe addition of short course neoadjuvant Bev to standard chemotherapy did not demonstrate a DFS or OS benefit. Achieving a pCR with D-FEC is associated with improved DFS and OS but not when pCR is achieved with Bev + D-FEC. At the present time therefore, Bev is not recommended in early breast cancer.ClinicalTrials.gov numberNCT01093235.     

Effect of Breast Conservation Therapy vs Mastectomy on Overall Survival and Breast Cancer-Specific Survival Among Men With Stage I-II Breast Cancer: Analysis of SEER, 2000-2018

BackgroundMale breast cancer is a rare malignant tumor, and outcomes of breast conservation therapy (BCT) are currently lacking.MethodThe retrospective, population-based cohort study included 1369 stage I-II (T1–2 N0–1 M0) male breast cancer patients from the SEER database (2000-2018). The patients were grouped in two groups: BCT group and mastectomy group, according to surgical and radiation therapy. Kaplan-Meier method and univariable Cox proportional hazard analysis were used to compare overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) between two treatment groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the confounding factors.ResultsOf the 1369 men, 97 (7%) patients received BCT, 1272 (93%) received mastectomy alone. The 5- and 10-year OS rates were 92.3% and 80.7% for BCT group compared with 80.4% and 61.4% for mastectomy group. The 5- and 10-year BCSS rates were 96.5% and 93.9% for patients undergoing BCT, as compared with 93.1% and 84.4% for patients undergoing mastectomy. Compared with mastectomy group, BCT group showed improved OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.294; 95% CI 0.138-0.623, P = .002) and BCSS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.182; 95% CI 0.040-0.820, P = .027). Of the 791 patients with T1 stage, BCT showed insignificant association with OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.555; 95% CI 0.207-1.488, P = .242) and BCSS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.217; 95% CI 0.171-8.675, P = .844).ConclusionThe results of this cohort study suggest that BCT is at least equivalent to mastectomy in male breast cancer patients. The underlying mechanism of this association needs further research.     

Molecular Subtypes and Gene Expression Signatures as Prognostic Features in Fully Resected Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Tailored Approach to Adjuvant Trials

BackgroundTrials with adjuvant vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs) failed to demonstrate meaningful benefit in clinically high-risk, fully resected clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). We evaluated whether the ccrcc1-4 molecular subtypes and gene expression signatures (GES) are associated with outcomes in this setting.Materials and MethodsWe determined molecular subtypes as well as angiogenesis- and immune-related GES through RNA sequencing of 75 fresh frozen (FF) and 62 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor samples. We studied disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) and determined correlations among GES and Leibovich score.ResultsAngiogenesis-related GES and molecular subtypes were associated with longer DFS and OS across both cohorts, whereas immune-related GES were not. In the FF cohort, molecular subtypes (ccrcc2 & 3 vs. ccrcc1 & 4) were associated with DFS and OS, on bivariable analysis with Leibovich score (HR 0.62, 95%CI 0.39-0.98, P = .04 and HR 0.35, 95%CI 0.19-0.64, P < .001). In the FFPE cohort, molecular subtypes (ccrcc2 & 3 vs. ccrcc1&4) were also associated with DFS (HR 0.53, 95%CI 0.31-0.93, P = .03), but not OS (HR 0.59, 95%CI 0.31-1.13, P = .11) on bivariable analysis with Leibovich score. Leibovich score was significantly inversely correlated with all angiogenesis-related GES (all P < .01), but not correlated with immune-related GES.ConclusionsMolecular subtypes and angiogenesis-related GES are prognostic for DFS and OS in fully resected, localized ccRCC. Favorable ccrcc2 & 3 molecular subtypes with high angiogenesis-related GES, which respond best to VEGFR-TKIs, are at lower risk of relapse but were probably underrepresented in the adjuvant VEGFR-TKI trials since they inversely correlate with Leibovich score. Conversely, immune-related GES are not correlated with Leibovich score and clinically high-risk tumors can display both high and low immune-related GES. Therefore, molecular characterization could guide patient selection for adjuvant treatment.