Atypical Electrocardiographic Features of Cavotricuspid Isthmus‐Dependent Atrial Flutter Occurring during Left Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Background: Patients who have undergone percutaneous catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) may develop cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)‐dependent atrial flutter (AFL), which can occur either spontaneously during left atrial (LA) ablation for AF or by induction from sinus rhythm during the procedure. The electrocardiographic (ECG) characteristics of CTI‐dependent AFL occurring during LA ablation have not been described. The purpose of this study was to describe the ECG features of CTI‐dependent AFL occurring during percutaneous LA catheter ablation for AF. Methods and Results: Of 223 patients presenting for first AF ablation at our institution between May 2004 and February 2008, 20 patients (9%) developed CTI‐dependent AFL during LA ablation for AF. CTI‐dependent AFL developed spontaneously in 4 patients (20%) and was induced in 16 patients (80%). Among these 20 patients, 3 (15%) had typical ECG patterns and 17 (85%) had atypical ECG patterns. Flutter waves in the inferior leads were biphasic in 10 patients (50%), downward in 3 patients (15%), positive in 3 patients (15%), and not fitting the above classifications in 4 patients (20%). There was no statistically significant association between AFL pattern and LA size, left ventricular ejection fraction, total ablation time, duration of prior AF, or type of prior AF. Conclusion: A majority of patients with CTI‐dependent AFL occurring during LA ablation have atypical ECG patterns. Biphasic flutter waves in the inferior leads are common ECG features, occurring in one‐half of patients. Right atrial CTI‐dependent AFL should be suspected even if the ECG appearance is atypical. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2010;15(3):200–208     

Higher Rate of Recurrent Atrial Flutter and Atrial Fibrillation Following Atrial Flutter Ablation After Cardiac Surgery

Atrial Flutter After Cardiac Surgery . Introduction: Atrial flutter (AFL) is common after cardiac surgery. However, the types of post‐cardiac surgery AFL, its response to catheter‐based radiofrequency ablation, and its relationship to atrial fibrillation (AF) are unknown. Methods and Results: We retrospectively studied all patients who underwent mapping and ablation for AFL after cardiac surgery from January 1990 to July 2004. One hundred randomly selected patients without prior cardiac surgery (PCS) who underwent mapping and ablation of AFL served as the control population. A total of 236 patients formed the study population (mean age 62 + 13 years, 22% female) and 100 patients formed the control population (mean age 60 + 13 years, 25% female). The majority of patients without PCS had cavo‐tricuspid isthmus (CTI)‐dependent AFL when compared to patients with PCS (93% vs 72%, respectively, P < 0.0001). In contrast, scar‐related AFL was more common in patients with PCS as compared to patients without PCS (22% vs 3%, P < 0.0001). Predictors of scar related AFL in multivariable regression analysis included PCS and left‐sided AFL. Acute success rates and complications were similar between the groups. When compared to patients with AFL ablation without PCS, those that had AFL after PCS had higher rates of recurrence of both AFL (1% vs 12%, P < 0.0001; mean time to recurrence 1.85 years) and AF (16% vs 28%, P = 0.02; mean time to recurrence 2.67 years). Conclusion: Despite ablation of AFL, patients with PCS have a higher rate of AFL and AF when compared to patients without PCS who underwent ablation of atrial flutter during long‐term follow‐up. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. pp. 760‐765, July 2010)     

Clinical Significance of Early Recurrences of Atrial Tachycardia After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Early Recurrence After AF Ablation. Background: Atrial tachycardia (AT) commonly recurs within 3 months after radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, it remains unclear whether early recurrence of atrial tachycardia (ERAT) predicts late recurrence of AF or AT. Methods: Of 352 consecutive patients who underwent circumferential pulmonary vein isolation with or without linear ablation(s) for AF, 56 patients (15.9%) with ERAT were identified by retrospective analysis. ERAT was defined as early relapse of AT within a 3‐month blanking period after ablation. Results: During 21.7 ± 12.5 months, the rate of late recurrence was higher in patients with ERAT (41.1%) compared with those without ERAT (11.8%, P < 0.001). In a multivariable model, positive inducibility of AF or AT immediately after ablation (65.2% vs 36.4%, P = 0.046; odd ratio, 3.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.0–14.6) and the number of patients who underwent cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation (73.9% vs 42.4%, P = 0.042; odd ratio, 4.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.1–19.5) were significantly related to late recurrence in the ERAT group. The duration of ablation (174.3 ± 62.3 vs 114.7 ± 39.5 minutes, P = 0.046) and the procedure time (329.3 ± 83.4 vs 279.2 ± 79.7 minutes, P = 0.027) were significantly longer in patients with late recurrence than in those without late recurrence following ERAT. Conclusions: The late recurrence rate is higher in the patients with ERAT compared with those without ERAT following AF ablation, and is more often noted in the patients who underwent CTI ablation and had a prolonged procedure time. Furthermore, inducibility of AF or AT immediately after ablation independently predicts late recurrence in patients with ERAT. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 1331‐1337, December 2010)     

Role of Residual Potentials Inside Circumferential Pulmonary Veins Ablation Lines in the Recurrence of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Residual Potentials After Pulmonary Vein Isolation. Background: Residual gaps due to incomplete ablation lines are known to be the most common cause of recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation. We hypothesized that any residual potentials at the junction of the left atrium and pulmonary vein (PV), inside the circumferential PV ablation (CPVA) lines, would contribute to the recurrence of AF or post‐AF ablation atrial flutter (AFL); therefore, the elimination of these potentials increases AF‐/AFL‐free survival rates. Methods and Results: One hundred and two patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) were enrolled and prospectively randomized to a group with ablation of residual potentials as add‐on therapy to CPVA + PV electrical isolation (PVI) (group 1, n = 49), or a group without ablation of the residual potentials (group 2, n = 53). Post‐CPVA residual potentials, inside the ablation lines, were identified by contact bipolar electrode mapping catheter and a detailed 3‐dimensional voltage map. Twenty‐three patients in group 1 and 18 patients in group 2 had post‐CPVA residual potentials (46.9% vs 34.0%, P = 0.182). The AF‐/AFL‐free survival rate during follow‐up of 23.3 ± 7.9 months was not different in comparisons between the 2 groups (P = 0.818), and 79.6% and 81.1% of the patients in groups 1 and 2 maintained a sinus rhythm (P = 0.845), respectively. Conclusions: Residual potentials inside CPVA were commonly found in the patients with PAF after CPVA + PVI. Further ablation of residual potentials did not increase the efficacy of catheter ablation in patients with PAF. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 959‐965, September 2010)     

Electrophysiological Characteristics of Localized Reentrant Atrial Tachycardia Occurring After Catheter Ablation of Long-Lasting Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Background: Mapping of recurrent atrial tachycardia (AT) after extensive ablation for long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is complex. We sought to describe the electrophysiological characteristics of localized reentry occurring after ablation of long-lasting persistent AF.
Methods: Out of 70 patients undergoing catheter ablation of long-lasting persistent AF, 9 patients (13%, 55 ± 8 years, 8 males) in whom localized reentry was demonstrated in a repeat ablation were studied. Localized reentry was defined as reentry in which the circuit was localized to a small area and did not have a central obstacle. The mechanism of AT was determined by electroanatomical and entrainment mapping.
Results: Nine localized reentries with cycle length of 243 ± 41 ms were mapped in 9 patients. The location of AT was the left atrial appendage in 4 patients, anterior left atrium in 2, left septum in 2, and mitral isthmus in 1. In all ATs, a critical isthmus of <10 mm in width was identified in the vicinity of the prior linear lesions or ostia of isolated pulmonary veins. Ablation of the critical isthmus, which was characterized by continuous low-voltage activity (median voltage: 0.15 mV, mean duration: 117 ± 31 ms), terminated AT and rendered it noninducible. Additionally, ablation was performed for all of inducible ATs. At 11 ± 7 months after the procedure, 8 of 9 patients (89%) were free from any arrhythmias.
Conclusions: After ablation of long-lasting persistent AF, localized reentry may arise from a site in the vicinity of the prior ablation lesions. Ablation of the critical isthmus eliminates the arrhythmia.     

Concealed Automaticity From an Island of Atrial Myocardium Post Cavotricuspid Ablation

Island of Atrial Myocardium Post Cavotricuspid Ablation. We report the case of a patient with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in whom 2 previous cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablations were performed for recurrent type I counterclockwise atrial flutter. One year after the last CTI ablation, the patient underwent pulmonary vein isolation for AF and reassessment of conduction block in the CTI was performed during the procedure. While mapping the CTI, activations were documented within the CTI that were dissociated from both right atrial and ventricular activity during sinus rhythm and pacing maneuvers. This dissociated activity was confined to a region delimited by the 2 previous ablation lines, the tricuspid annulus and the inferior vena cava. These findings suggest that an island of atrial myocardium with automatic activity was created within the CTI by previous ablation lines. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 1408‐1409, December 2010)     

Catheter ablation of arrhythmias in ebstein's anomaly: a multicenter study

Catheter Ablation in Ebstein's Anomaly. Introduction: In patients with Ebstein's anomaly (EA) arrhythmias are frequently encountered. Although most arrhythmias can be targeted with catheter ablation, specific issues render the procedure more challenging in EA. This study examines the mechanisms of the different arrhythmias related to EA and the outcome after catheter ablation. Methods And Results: Clinical and procedural data of catheter ablation in patients with EA in 4 European centers were analyzed. In 32 patients (mean age 24 ± 15 years), 34 accessory pathways (APs), 8 intra‐atrial reentry tachycardias (IART), 5 cavotricuspid isthmus‐dependent atrial flutter (CTI‐AFL), 2 focal atrial tachycardias, and 1 atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia were ablated. In 11 patients (34%), multiple ablation targets were present. Eighteen patients (56%) required multiple procedures either for repeat ablation of the same arrhythmia (n = 12), ablation of a different arrhythmia (n = 4), or both re‐ablation of the same and of a different arrhythmia (n = 2). Procedural success rate after first ablation was 80% for APs and CTI‐AFL ablation, and 100% for IART ablation. Redo procedures were necessary in 40% of the patients after ablation of an APs, and in 60% after CTI‐AFL ablation, but in none of the patient with IART ablation. Conclusion: Most arrhythmias related to EA are amenable to catheter ablation. However, ablation procedures are challenging and the need for repeat procedure is particularly high, because some patients have multiple ablation targets and because of technical issues in relation with the dysplastic tricuspid annulus. In addition, several patients develop other arrhythmia mechanisms following ablation . (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 22, pp. 1391‐1396, December 2011)     

Right Atrial Mapping and Linear Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Objective: Catheter ablation techniques to cure atrial fibrillation (AF) are under investigation. This study evaluates a mapping-based, individualized approach to right atrial (RA) linear ablation in patients with paroxysmal AF. Methods: In this prospective observational study, 29 patients with recurrent symptomatic AF refractory to medical therapy, underwent linear ablation between May 1998 and December 1999. Inclusion criteria were symptomatic paroxysmal AF, failure of at least 2 antiarrhythmic medications, and informed consent. Radiofrequency ablation was performed in the RA using a 3.3 French multielectrode catheter, ablating through sequential electrodes to establish linear lesions. Lesions were delivered during sustained AF, guided by an empiric mapping scheme, targeting arrhythmogenic areas noted during electrophysiologic testing in sinus rhythm and areas of most disorganization during AF. Reinduction of AF was attempted at the end of successful ablation. Results: The mean age was 58 years. There were 15 male and 14 female patients. Sustained AF was inducible in all patients at electrophysiology study. Acute success was achieved in 24 patients (83%). Long term success (maintaining sinus rhythm off antiarrhythmic medications) was seen in 23 (79%) over a mean follow-up of 19.7 months. Ablation lines varied from patient to patient. There were no complications. Conclusions: Individualized linear ablation in the RA using a multielectrode catheter system can produce effective suppression of paroxysmal AF. Ablation during AF, and testing to reinduce AF at the end of the procedure, make this study unique.     

Efficacy of Additional Ablation of Complex Fractionated Atrial Electrograms for Catheter Ablation of Nonparoxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Background: The efficacy of ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFEs) in the single ablation procedure for nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) patients is not well demonstrated. The aim of this study was to compare the ablation strategies of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) plus linear ablation with and without additional ablation of CFEs in these patients.
Methods: Consecutive 60 patients (49 ± 11 years old, 50 male, 10 female) with nonparoxysmal AF underwent catheter ablation guided by a NavX mapping system. A stepwise approach included a circumferential PVI and left atrial (LA) linear ablation followed by either the additional ablation of continuous CFEs in the LA/coronary sinus (the first 30 patients) or not (the second 30 patients), detected by an automatic algorithm.
Results: There was no difference in the baseline characteristics between the two groups. Complete PVI eliminated some continuous CFEs and altered the distribution of CFEs. Following PVI and linear ablation, the remaining continuous CFEs were identified in 7.9 ± 10% mapping sites of the LA and CS, and were ablated successfully with a procedural AF termination rate of 53%. With a follow-up of 19 ± 11 months, a Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that the patients with additional ablation of the CFEs had a higher rate of sinus rhythm maintenance. Multivariate analysis showed the single procedure success could be predicted by the procedural AF termination and the additional ablation of continuous CFEs in the LA/CS.
Conclusions: Ablation of continuous CFEs after PVI and LA linear ablation had a better long-term efficacy based on the results of single-ablation procedure.     

Pulmonary Vein Antral Isolation and Nonpulmonary Vein Trigger Ablation without Additional Substrate Modification for Treating Longstanding Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

PV Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. Introduction: Effectiveness of antral pulmonary vein isolation (PVAI) and ablation of non‐PV triggers (non‐PVTA) in controlling longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been reported. We sought to describe clinical outcomes with this ablation strategy in patients (pts) followed for at least 1 year. Methods: Two hundred pts underwent PVAI for longstanding persistent AF and were followed for recurrence. Thirty‐three pts with <1‐year follow‐up and 37 pts with additional RF atrial ablation were excluded, leaving 130 pts for analysis. Results: All 130 pts (108 men, mean LA 4.7 ± 0.6 cm, mean AF duration of 38 ± 44 months) underwent PVAI with entrance/exit block. In addition, 24 pts (15 pts during the initial procedure and 9 additional pts at repeat ablations) had 40 non‐PVTA, including 3 with AVNRT. During follow‐up, atrial flutter (AFL) was noted in 7 (5%) pts. The AF‐free survival after single procedure without antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) was 38%. Repeat AF or AFL ablation was performed in 37 pts (28%) with PV reconnection uniformly identified (3.7 ± 0.5 veins/pt). During mean follow‐up of 41.1 ± 23.8 months (range 12–103 months), 85/130 pts (65%) were in sinus rhythm with 65 pts (50%) off AAD, 20 pts (15%) on AAD. Additionally, 9 pts (7%) have had rare episodes of AF such that 72% of pts have had good long‐term clinical outcome. Of the 36 pts with recurrent AF, 20 pts have not had a repeat procedure. Conclusions: PVAI with non‐PVTA for longstanding persistent AF provides good long‐term AF control in over 70% of patients with infrequent (5%) AFL. AAD therapy and repeat PVAI may be required for this optimal outcome. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 23, pp. 806‐813, August 2012)     

A Prospective,Randomized Comparison of Modified Pulmonary Vein Isolation Versus Conventional Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Modified Pulmonary Vein Isolation in AF Ablation. Introduction: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the primary ablation therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We hypothesized that high dominant frequency (DF) sites (AF nests during sinus rhythm [SR]) adjacent to the PV ostia are associated with the atrial substrate that maintains AF, and PVI incorporating the high‐frequency AF nests may have a higher efficacy. Methods and Results: In a prospective and randomized comparison, 126 symptomatic paroxysmal AF patients that underwent PVI were enrolled. We compared the efficacy of a modified PVI (ablation line: 1.0–1.5 cm from the PV ostium with encircling the AF nests [spectral analysis with DF >70 Hz during SR, Group II]) versus the anatomy‐guided conventional PVI (Group I). In Group II, the DF value along the PV ostium was lower than 70 Hz after the PVI. The primary endpoint was the freedom from symptomatic atrial arrhythmias after a single procedure. We also followed the autonomic function by a time‐domain analysis of the heart rate variability. In both groups, AF nests were observed and electric isolation was successfully obtained in all patients. With a mean duration of 16 ± 6.1 months of follow‐up, Group II had a higher single procedure efficacy without drugs (78.7% vs 66.1%, log‐rank test: P = 0.02), and fewer repeat procedures (6.6% vs 23%; P = 0.04), as compared to Group I. Conclusion: PVI incorporating the high frequency AF nests adjacent to the PV ostia had a better single procedure efficacy. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 23, pp. 1155–1162, November 2012)     

Persistence of Pulmonary Vein Isolation After Robotic Remote‐Navigated Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation and its Relation to Clinical Outcome

Robotic Remote Ablation for AF . Aims: A robotic navigation system (RNS, Hansen?) has been developed as an alternative method of performing ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). Despite the growing application of RNS‐guided pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), its consequences and mechanisms of subsequent AF recurrences are unknown. We investigated the acute procedural success and persistence of PVI over time after robotic PVI and its relation to clinical outcome. Methods and Results: Sixty‐four patients (60.7 ± 9.8 years, 53 male) with paroxysmal AF underwent robotic circumferential PVI with 3‐dimensional left atrial reconstruction (NavX?). A voluntary repeat invasive electrophysiological study was performed 3 months after ablation irrespective of clinical course. Robotic PVI was successful in all patients without complication (fluoroscopy time: 23.5 [12–34], procedure time: 180 [150–225] minutes). Fluoroscopy time demonstrated a gradual decline but was significantly reduced after the 30th patient following the introduction of additional navigation software (34 [29–45] vs 12 [9–17] minutes; P < 0.001). A repeat study at 3 months was performed in 63% of patients and revealed electrical conduction recovery in 43% of all PVs. Restudied patients without AF recurrence (n = 28) showed a significantly lower number of recovered PVs (1 (0–2) vs 2 (2–3); P = 0.006) and a longer LA‐PV conduction delay than patients with AF recurrences (n = 12). Persistent block of all PVs was associated with freedom from AF in all patients. At 3 months, 67% of patients were free of AF, while reablation of recovered PVs led to an overall freedom from AF in 81% of patients after 1 year. Conclusion: Robotic PVI for PAF is safe, effective, and requires limited fluoroscopy while yielding comparable success rates to conventional ablation approaches with PV reconduction as a common phenomenon associated with AF recurrences. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 1079‐1084)     

Linear Ablation of Right Atrial Free Wall Flutter: Demonstration of Bidirectional Conduction Block as an Endpoint Associated With Long‐Term Success

Ablation of Right Atrial Free Wall Flutter. Introduction: Ablation for atypical atrial flutter (AFL) is often performed during tachycardia, with termination or noninducibility of AFL as the endpoint. Termination alone is, however, an inadequate endpoint for typical AFL ablation, where incomplete isthmus block leads to high recurrence rates. We assessed conduction block across a low lateral right atrial (RA) ablation line (LRA) from free wall scar to the inferior vena cava (IVC) or tricuspid annulus in 11 consecutive patients with atypical RA free wall flutter. Method and results: LRA block was assessed following termination of AFL, by pacing from the ablation catheter in the low lateral RA posterior to the ablation line and recording the sequence and timing of activation anterior to the line with a duodecapole catheter, and vice versa for bidirectional block. LRA block resulted in a high to low activation pattern on the halo and a mean conduction time of 201 ± 48 ms to distal halo. LRA conduction block was present in only 2 out of 6 patients after termination of AFL by ablation. Ablation was performed during sinus rhythm (SR) in 9 patients to achieve LRA conduction block. No recurrence of AFL was observed at long‐term follow‐up (22 ± 12 months); 3 patients developed AF. Conclusion: Termination of right free wall flutter is often associated with persistent LRA conduction and additional radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in SR is usually required. Low RA pacing may be used to assess LRA conduction block and offers a robust endpoint for atypical RA free wall flutter ablation, which results in a high long‐term cure rate. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 526‐531, May 2010)     

The Modified Ablation Guided by Ibutilide Use in Chronic Atrial Fibrillation (MAGIC-AF) Study: clinical background and study design

The MAGIC‐AF Study. Background: Beyond pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), adjuvant ablation at the sites of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) has been shown to improve the long‐term success of catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, this approach often requires extensive ablation due to the widespread distribution of CFAE within the left atrium. An optimal strategy would identify areas of CFAE which, when selectively targeted with ablation, result in AF termination with an acceptable long‐term freedom from AF. It is possible that the intraprocedural administration of an antiarrhythmic drug may help accomplish this. Objective: The Modified Ablation Guided by Ibutilide Use in Chronic AF (MAGIC‐AF) Study is an international multicenter prospective randomized double‐blinded clinical trial assessing the utility of the intraprocedural administration of 0.25 mg of intravenous ibutilide before performing CFAE ablation. The primary efficacy endpoint of this study will be the freedom from AF at 1 year after a single procedure off antiarrhythmic agents. Safety endpoints will include procedural and radiofrequency ablation time as well as overall procedural complication rate. Methods: Patients undergoing a first ever catheter ablation procedure for persistent AF will be included. Individuals with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, complex congenital heart disease including atrial septal defects, and ejection fraction <35% will be excluded from the study. All patients will first undergo PVI. Those patients who remain in AF will then be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either 0.25 mg intravenous ibutilide or saline placebo followed by a CFAE based ablation strategy. Two hundred randomized patients will be enrolled in this study—100 in each study arm. Conclusion: The MAGIC‐AF study will assess the utility of a combined pharmaco‐ablative strategy in patients with persistent AF undergoing a CFAE based ablation strategy.     

Importance of Sinus Rhythm as Endpoint of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Endpoint of Persistent AF Ablation . Background: The endpoint of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is still a matter of debate. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if sinus rhythm (SR) as endpoint of persistent AF ablation has a better long‐term outcome compared to atrial tachycardia (AT) or AF at the end of the procedure. Methods and Results: Between 2008 and 2011, 191 consecutive patients undergoing de novo catheter ablation for symptomatic persistent and long‐standing persistent AF using a sequential ablation approach (including pulmonary vein isolation, ablation of complex fractionated electrograms and linear lesions) were included in the study. According to the result at the end of ablation procedure, patients were classified into 3 groups: patients with termination of AF into SR (Group 1, n = 62), patients with AT undergoing cardioversion (CV) (Group 2, n = 47), or patients with AF undergoing CV (Group 3, n = 82). The primary endpoint was freedom from any atrial tachyarrhythmia off antiarrhythmic drugs at 12 months. At 12 months, estimated proportions of patients free from any arrhythmia recurrence were 42% for Group 1, 13% for Group 2, and 25% for Group 3 (P = 0.002). In a Cox regression analysis only termination into SR was associated with a lower risk of arrhythmia recurrence (HR: 0.62; P = 0.04). Conclusion: If SR is achieved as endpoint of persistent and long‐standing persistent AF ablation using a sequential ablation approach it is associated with the highest long‐term single procedure success rate compared to AT or AF at the end of the procedure. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 24, pp. 388‐395, April 2013)     

Cryoballoon Versus Radiofrequency for Pulmonary Vein Re‐Isolation After a Failed Initial Ablation Procedure in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Cryoballoon versus Radiofrequency Ablation . Aim: Catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) is associated with an important risk of early and late recurrence, necessitating repeat ablation procedures. The aim of this prospective randomized patient‐blind study was to compare the efficacy and safety of cryoballoon (Cryo) versus radiofrequency (RF) ablation of PAF after failed initial RF ablation procedure. Methods: Patients with a history of symptomatic PAF after a previous failed first RF ablation procedure were eligible for this study. Patients were randomized to Cryo or RF redo ablation. The primary endpoint of the study was recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia, including AF and left atrial flutter/tachycardia, after a second ablation procedure at 1 year of follow‐up. All patients were implanted with a cardiac monitor (Reveal XT, Medtronic) to continuously track the cardiac rhythm. Patients with an AF burden (AF%) ≤ 0.5% were considered AF‐free (Responders), while those with an AF% > 0.5% were classified as patients with AF recurrences (non‐Responders). Results: Eighty patients with AF recurrences after a first RF pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) were randomized to Cryo (N = 40) or to RF (N = 40). Electrical potentials were recorded in 77 mapped PVs (1.9 ± 0.8 per patient) in Cryo Group and 72 PVs (1.7 ± 0.8 per patient) in RF Group (P = 0.62), all of which were targeted. In Cryo group, 68 (88%) of the 77 PVs were re‐isolated using only Cryo technique; the remaining 9 PVs were re‐isolated using RF. In RF group, all 72 PVs were successfully re‐isolated (P = 0.003 vs Cryo). By intention‐to‐treat, 23 (58%) RF patients were AF‐free vs 17 (43%) Cryo patients on no antiarrhythmic drugs at 1 year (P = 0.06). Three patients had temporary phrenic nerve paralysis in the Cryo group; the RF group had no complications. Of the 29 patients who had only Cryo PVI without any RF ablation, 11 (38%) were AF‐free vs 20 (59%) of the 34 patients who had RF only (P = 0.021). Conclusion: When patients require a redo pulmonary vein isolation ablation procedure for recurrent PAF, RF appears to be the preferred energy source relative to Cryo. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 24, pp. 274‐279, March 2013)     

Catheter Ablation of Typical Atrial Flutter in Severe Pulmonary Hypertension

Atrial Flutter and Pulmonary Hypertension. Background: Radiofrequency ablation is first‐line therapy for atrial flutter (AFL). There are no studies of ablation in patients with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Methods: Consecutive patients with severe PAH (systolic pulmonary artery pressure >60 mmHg) and AFL referred for ablation were evaluated. Patients with complex congenital heart disease were excluded. Results: A total of 14 AFL ablation procedures were undertaken in 12 patients. A total of 75% of patients were female; mean age 49 ± 12 years. SPAP prior to ablation was 99 ± 35 mmHg. Baseline 6‐minute walk distance was 295 ± 118 m. ECG demonstrated a typical AFL pattern in only 42% of cases. Baseline AFL cycle length was longer in PAH patients compared to controls (295 ± 53 ms vs 252 ± 35 ms, P = 0.006). Cavotricuspid isthmus dependence was verified in 86% of cases. Acute success was obtained in 86% of procedures. SPAP decreased from 114 ± 44 mmHg to 82 ± 38 mmHg after ablation (P = 0.004). BNP levels were lower postablation (787 ± 832 pg/mL vs 522 ± 745 pg/mL, P = 0.02). Complications were seen in 14%. A total of 80% (8/10) of patients were free of AFL at 3 months; 75% (6/8) at 1 year. Conclusion: Ablation of AFL in severe PAH patients is feasible, with good short‐ and intermediate‐term success rates. The ECG pattern is not a reliable marker of isthmus dependence. The SPAP and BNP levels may decrease postablation. AFL may be a marker of poor outcomes in patients with PAH with a 1‐year mortality rate of 42% in this study. This rate is higher than expected in the general PAH population. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 23, pp. 1185–1190, November 2012)     

Ablation of Ligament of Marshall Attenuates Atrial Vulnerability to Fibrillation Induced by Inferior Left Atrial Fat Pad Stimulation in Dogs

Ligament of Marshall and Atrial Fibrillation Induction. Background: The role of ligament of Marshall (LOM) in the mechanism of “vagal” atrial fibrillation (AF) is still unknown. Objective: To investigate the impact of LOM ablation on atrial vulnerability to AF induced by inferior left atrial fat pad (ILAFP) stimulation in dogs. Methods: AF inducibility and atrial effective refractory period (ERP) were elevated before and after LOM ablation in 8 of 14 dogs (the ablation group). Same protocol but without LOM ablation was conducted in the remaining 6 dogs (the control group). The activation patterns of LOM and left pulmonary veins (LPVs) during sustained AF were analyzed. The distribution of epicardial cholinergic nerve fibers between LOM and ILAFP was investigated in the control group. Results: Ablation of LOM significantly attenuated AF inducibility (87.5% vs 33.3%, P < 0.001) and prolonged ERPs of the structures in contiguity with LOM (P < 0.05) in the ablation group. In contrast, there was no significant change in ERPs and AF inducibility in the control group. During sustained AF, fractionated atrial electrograms were more common in the LOM area than the LPVs (84% vs 18% of the analyzed episodes, P < 0.001). In 46.7% of the episodes with identifiable LOM spikes, atrial potentials, and LOM spikes were related in 2:1 or 3:2 pattern during the intermittent organized activity. Acetylcholinesterase staining revealed a close cholinergic nerved relationship between LOM and ILAFP. Conclusions: LOM plays a critical role in maintaining AF induced by stimulation of ILAFP. Ablation of LOM can markedly attenuate AF inducibility in this model. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 1024‐1030, September 2010)     

Catheter Ablation for Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia worldwide and represents a major burden to health care systems. Atrial fibrillation is associated with a 4- to 5-fold increased risk of thromboembolic stroke. The pulmonary veins have been identified as major sources of atrial triggers for AF. This is particularly true in patients with paroxysmal AF but not always the case for those with long-standing persistent AF (LSPAF), in which other locations for ectopic beats have been well recognized. Structures with foci triggering AF include the coronary sinus, the left atrial appendage (LAA), the superior vena cava, the crista terminalis, and the ligament of Marshall. More than 30 studies reporting results on radiofrequency ablation of LSPAF have been published to date. Most of these are observational studies with very different methodologies using different strategies. As a result, there has been remarkable variation in short- and long-term success, which suggests that the optimal ablation technique for LSPAF is still to be elucidated. In this review we discuss the different approaches to LSPAF catheter ablation, starting with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) through ablation lines in different left atrial locations, the role of complex fractionated atrial electrograms, focal impulses and rotor modulation, autonomic modulation (ganglionated plexi), alcohol ablation, and the future of epicardial mapping and ablation for this arrhythmia. A stepwise ablation approach requires several key ablation techniques, such as meticulous PVI, linear ablation at the roof and mitral isthmus, electrogram-targeted ablation with particular attention to triggers in the coronary sinus and LAA, and discretionary right atrial ablation (superior vena cava, intercaval, or cavotricuspid isthmus lines).     

Outcomes of Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation in Patients on Chronic Hemodialysis

AF Ablation in HD Patients . Introduction: It is not common for patients on chronic hemodialysis (HD) to undergo catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to show the outcomes of AF ablation in the HD patients. Methods and Results: Thirty HD patients who underwent pulmonary vein (PV) isolation for drug refractory paroxysmal AF were retrospectively studied, and their AF recurrence free rate and frequency of periprocedural complications were compared to 60 age‐ and gender‐matched control patients not requiring HD. A nonirrigated ablation catheter was used in both patient groups. During a mean follow‐up period of 821 ± 218 days, 16 (54%) of the HD patients remained free from AF recurrence without any antiarrhythmic agents versus 47 (78%) of the control patients with an initial ablation (P = 0.013). A second ablation procedure was performed in 12 patients with an AF recurrence, and consequently 20 (67%) of the HD patients were in sinus rhythm compared to 53 (88%) of the controls during a follow‐up duration of 747 ± 221 after the last ablation (P = 0.012). Bleeding from the venipuncture site requiring a prolonged hospital stay was identified in 2 HD patients and 1 control subject, while no life‐threatening complications were observed in either patient group. Conclusion: Although the success rate of the PV isolation in HD patients was far from satisfactory, it may be considered as one of the therapeutic options for them. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 23, pp. 1289‐1294, December 2012)