Aspirin and the in vitro linear relationship between thromboxane A2‐mediated platelet aggregation and platelet production of thromboxane A2

Summary. Background: Currently, ‘aspirin resistance’, the anti‐platelet effects of non‐steroid anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and NSAID‐aspirin interactions are hot topics of debate. It is often held in this debate that the relationship between platelet activation and thromboxane (TX) A₂ formation is non‐linear and TXA₂ generation must be inhibited by at least 95% to inhibit TXA₂‐dependent aggregation. This relationship, however, has never been rigorously tested. Objectives: To characterize, in vitro and ex vivo, the concentration‐dependent relationships between TXA₂ generation and platelet activity. Method: Platelet aggregation, thrombi adhesion and TXA₂ production in response to arachidonic acid (0.03–1 mmol L^?1), collagen (0.1–30 μg mL^?1), epinephrine (0.001–100 μmol L^?1), ADP, TRAP‐6 amide and U46619 (all 0.1‐30 μmol L^?1), in the presence of aspirin or vehicle, were determined in 96‐well plates using blood taken from naïve individuals or those that had taken aspirin (75 mg, o.d.) for 7 days. Results: Platelet aggregation, adhesion and TXA₂ production induced by either arachidonic acid or collagen were inhibited in concentration‐dependent manners by aspirin, with logIC₅₀ values that did not differ. A linear relationship existed between aggregation and TXA₂ production for all combinations of arachidonic acid or collagen and aspirin (P < 0.01; R² 0.92; n = 224). The same relationships were seen in combinations of aspirin‐treated and naïve platelets, and in blood from individuals taking an anti‐thrombotic dose of aspirin. Conculsions: These studies demonstrate a linear relationship between inhibition of platelet TXA₂ generation and TXA₂‐mediated aggregation. This finding is important for our understanding of the anti‐platelet effects of aspirin and NSAIDs, NSAID–aspirin interactions and ‘aspirin resistance’.     

Potentiation of clopidogrel active metabolite formation by rifampicin leads to greater P2Y12 receptor blockade and inhibition of platelet aggregation after clopidogrel

Summary. Background: The thienopyridine P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonist clopidogrel reduces the risk of arterial thrombosis and individual pharmacodynamic responses to clopidogrel are believed to reflect the levels of active metabolite (AM) generated. Rifampicin increases the inhibitory effect of clopidogrel on platelet aggregation (PA). We studied the response to clopidogrel before and during administration of rifampicin in order to study the relationship between individual AM levels and P2Y₁₂ blockade. Methods: Healthy volunteers received a 600‐mg loading dose of clopidogrel followed by 75 mg daily for 7 days and, after a washout period and treatment with rifampicin [300 mg twice a day (b.i.d.)], received the same regimen of clopidogrel. Clopidogrel AM levels were determined over 4 h after the clopidogrel loading dose and unblocked P2Y₁₂ receptor number was assessed using a ³³P‐2MeSADP binding assay. PA was measured by optical aggregometry with ADP and TRAP. Results: Rifampicin enhanced clopidogrel AM production [area‐under‐the‐curve (AUC): clopidogrel 89 ± 22 ng h mL^?1, clopidogrel + rifampicin 335 ± 86 ng h mL^?1, P < 0.0001], and P2Y₁₂ blockade (unblocked receptors: clopidogrel 48 ± 24, clopidogrel + rifampicin 4 ± 2, P < 0.0001) and reduced PA (5 μmol L^?1 ADP: clopidogrel 20 ± 4, clopidogrel + rifampicin 5 ± 2, P < 0.01). Increasing numbers of unblocked receptors were required for an aggregation response with a decreasing concentration of ADP. PA induced by ADP 2 μmol L^?1 was particularly sensitive to low levels of receptor blockade. Conclusion: Potentiation of clopidogrel AM production by rifampicin leads to greater P2Y₁₂ blockade and consequently greater inhibition of PA. PA responses to low concentrations of ADP are more sensitive to P2Y₁₂ blockade.     

Which platelet function test is suitable to monitor clopidogrel responsiveness? A pharmacokinetic analysis on the active metabolite of clopidogrel

Summary. Background: Multiple platelet function tests claim to be P2Y12‐pathway specific and capable of capturing the biological activity of clopidogrel. Objectives: The aim of the present study was to determine which platelet function test provides the best reflection of the in vivo plasma levels of the active metabolite of clopidogrel (AMC). Patients/methods: Clopidogrel‐naive patients scheduled for elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) received a 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel and 100 mg of aspirin. For pharmacokinetic analysis, blood was drawn at 0, 20, 40, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240 and 360 min after clopidogrel loading and peak plasma concentrations (C_max) of the AMC were quantified with liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry (LC‐MS/MS). Platelet function testing was performed at baseline and 360 min after the clopidogrel loading. Results: The VASP‐assay, the VerifyNow P2Y12‐assay and 20 μmol L^?1 adenosine diphosphate (ADP)‐induced light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) showed strong correlations with C_max of the AMC (VASP: R² = 0.56, P < 0.001; VerifyNow platelet reactivity units (PRU): R² = 0.48, P < 0.001; VerifyNow %inhibition: R² = 0.59, P < 0.001; 20 μmol L^?1 ADP‐induced LTA: R² = 0.47, P < 0.001). Agreement with C_max of the AMC was less evident for 5 μmol L^?1 ADP‐induced LTA or whole blood aggregometry (WBA), whereas the IMPACT‐R ADP test did not show any correlation with plasmalevels of the AMC. Conclusion: The flow cytometric VASP‐assay, the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay and, although to a lesser extent, 20 μmol L^?1 ADP‐induced LTA correlate best with the maximal plasma level of the AMC, suggesting these may be the preferred platelet function tests for monitoring the responsiveness to clopidogrel.     

Randomized,double‐blind comparison of effects of abiciximab bolus only vs. on‐label regimen on ex vivo inhibition of platelet aggregation in responders to clopidogrel undergoing coronary stenting

Summary. Background: On top of aspirin, an abciximab bolus‐only regimen results in a 30% drop in platelet inhibition at 6 h as compared with the on‐label regimen. The concomitant administration of high loading dose clopidogrel, by bridging with abciximab bolus, may sustain suppression of platelet activity over time. Objectives: To investigate the non‐inferiority of abciximab bolus‐only and concomitant high loading dose clopidogrel vs. abciximab bolus + infusion with respect to the inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) as determined by light transmission aggregometry. Patients/Methods: Seventy‐three patients with non‐ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes underwent double‐blind randomization to abciximab bolus followed by a 12‐h placebo infusion and concomitant 600‐mg clopidogrel vs. abciximab bolus + a 12‐h infusion and 300 mg of clopidogrel. IPA was determined by light transmission aggregometry throughout 24 h. Clopidogrel poor responsiveness was defined as ≥ 50% 5 μmol L^?1 ADP‐induced maximum platelet aggregation. Results: In clopidogrel responders (n = 68), IPA after 20 μmol L^?1 ADP at 4 h was 89% ± 13% in the bolus‐only arm vs. 92% ± 14% in the bolus + infusion arm (P = 0.011 for non‐inferiority). IPA after 5 or 20 μmol L^?1 ADP and 5 or 15 μmol L^?1 TRAP and the proportion of patients showing ≥ 80% IPA did not differ at any time point, irrespective of clopidogrel responsiveness status. Thirty‐day outcomes were similar, whereas hemoglobin (0.91 ± 0.8 vs. 0.5 ± 0.7 g dL^?1; P = 0.01) and platelet count mean drop (41.7 ± 57 vs. 18.6 ± 34 10⁹ L^?1; P = 0.042) were significantly reduced in the bolus‐only arm. Conclusions: Withholding abciximab post‐bolus infusion in patients receiving high loading dose clopidogrel does not impair platelet inhibition throughout 24 h, and has the potential to improve the safety profile of the drug at reduced costs.     

Modified diadenosine tetraphosphates with dual specificity for P2Y1 and P2Y12 are potent antagonists of ADP‐induced platelet activation

Chang H, Yanachkov IB, Dix EJ, Li YF, Barnard MR, Wright GE, Michelson AD, Frelinger AL 3rd. Modified diadenosine tetraphosphates with dual specificity for P2Y₁ and P2Y₁₂ are potent antagonists of ADP‐induced platelet activation. J Thromb Haemost 2012; 10: 2573–80. Summary. Background: Diadenosine 5′,5′′′‐P¹,P⁴‐tetraphosphate (Ap₄A), a natural compound stored in platelet dense granules, inhibits ADP‐induced platelet aggregation. Ap₄A inhibits the platelet ADP receptors P2Y₁ and P2Y₁₂, is a partial agonist of P2Y₁₂, and is a full agonist of the platelet ATP‐gated ion channel P2X1. Modification of the Ap₄A tetraphosphate backbone enhances inhibition of ADP‐induced platelet aggregation. However, the effects of these Ap₄A analogs on human platelet P2Y₁, P2Y₁₂ and P2X1 are unclear. Objective: To determine the agonist and antagonist activities of diadenosine tetraphosphate analogs towards P2Y₁, P2Y₁₂, and P2X1. Methods: We synthesized the following Ap₄A analogs: P¹,P⁴‐dithiotetraphosphate; P²,P³‐chloromethylenetetraphosphate; P¹‐thio‐P²,P³‐chloromethylenetetraphosphate; and P¹,P⁴‐dithio‐P²,P³‐chloromethylenetetraphosphate. We then measured the effects of these analogs on: (i) ADP‐induced platelet aggregation; (ii) P2Y₁‐mediated changes in cytosolic Ca²⁺; (iii) P2Y₁₂‐mediated changes in vasodilator‐stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation; and (iv) P2X1‐mediated entry of extracellular Ca²⁺.Results: Ap₄A analogs with modifications in the phosphate backbone inhibited both P2Y₁ and P2Y₁₂, and showed no agonist activity towards these receptors. The dithio modification increased inhibition of P2Y₁, P2Y₁₂, and platelet aggregation, whereas the chloromethylene modification increased inhibition of P2Y₁₂ and platelet aggregation, but decreased P2Y₁ inhibition. Combining the dithio and chloromethylene modifications increased P2Y₁ and P2Y₁₂ inhibition. As compared with Ap₄A, each modification decreased agonist activity towards P2X1, and the dual modification completely eliminated P2X1 agonist activity. Conclusions: As compared with Ap₄A, tetraphosphate backbone analogs of Ap₄A have diminished activity towards P2X1 but inhibit both P2Y₁ and P2Y₁₂ and, with greater potency, inhibit ADP‐induced platelet aggregation. Thus, diadenosine tetraphosphate analogs with dual receptor selectivity may have potential as antiplatelet drugs.     

Aspirin withdrawal in patients treated with ticagrelor presenting with non‐ST elevation myocardial infarction

Essentials

• Strong P2Y₁₂ blockade may cause platelet inhibition that is only minimally enhanced by aspirin.
• We evaluated aspirin withdrawal on platelet reactivity in ticagrelor treated patients.
• Aspirin withdrawal resulted in increased platelet reactivity to arachidonic acid.
• Aspirin withdrawal caused little difference in adenosine diphosphate‐induced platelet aggregation.

Summary

Background

Recent studies have shown that the thromboxane A₂‐dependent pathway is dependent on the ADP–P2Y₁₂ pathway, and that strong P2Y₁₂ receptor blockade alone causes inhibition of platelet aggregation that is minimally enhanced by aspirin. Data from the PLATO trial suggested that, among ticagrelor‐treated patients, high‐dose versus low‐dose (< 100 mg day^?1) aspirin is associated with an increased risk fof ischemic events.

Objectives

To evaluate the impact of aspirin withdrawal on platelet reactivity in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients treated with a potent P2Y₁₂ blocker.

Patients/Methods

This was a current prospective, randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind, cross‐over study. The study population comprised 22 consecutive ACS patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and were treated with aspirin (100 mg day^?1) and ticagrelor. Thirty days post‐ACS, open‐label aspirin was stopped, and patients were randomized to either blinded aspirin or placebo for 2 weeks, with each patient crossing over to the other arm for an additional 2 weeks. Platelet reactivity to arachidonic acid and ADP determined with light‐transmission aggregometry (LTA) and VerifyNow was evaluated at baseline, and 2 weeks and 4 weeks later.

Results

Aspirin withdrawal resulted in an increase in arachidonic‐acid induced platelet reactivity as determined with both LTA (77.0% ± 11.3% versus 20.8% ± 4.4%) and VerifyNow (607.7 ± 10.6 aspirin reaction units [ARU] versus 408.5 ± 14.4 ARU). Platelet response to ADP, as determined with both LTA and VerifyNow, did not differ with either aspirin or placebo (32.9% ± 2.6% versus 35.8% ± 3.6%, and 33.5 ± 6.4 P2Y₁₂ reaction units (PRU) versus 29.6 ± 5.7 PRU, respectively).

Conclusions

Aspirin withdrawal early post‐ACS results in increased platelet reactivity in response to arachidonic acid, despite concomitant treatment with the potent P2Y₁₂ blocker ticagrelor.

     

Ticagrelor binds to human P2Y12 independently from ADP but antagonizes ADP-induced receptor signaling and platelet aggregation

Summary. Background: P2Y₁₂ plays an important role in regulating platelet aggregation and function. This receptor is the primary target of thienopyridine antiplatelet agents, the active metabolites of which bind irreversibly to the receptor, and of newer agents that can directly and reversibly modulate receptor activity. Objective: To characterize the receptor biology of the first reversibly binding oral P2Y₁₂ antagonist, ticagrelor (AZD6140), a member of the new cyclopentyltriazolopyrimidine (CPTP) class currently in phase III development. Methods: Ticagrelor displayed apparent non‐competitive or insurmountable antagonism of ADP‐induced aggregation in human washed platelets. This was investigated using competition binding against [³H]ADP, [³³P]2MeS‐ADP and the investigational CPTP compound [¹²⁵I]AZ11931285 at recombinant human P2Y₁₂. Functional receptor inhibition studies were performed using a GTPγS‐binding assay, and further binding studies were performed using membranes prepared from washed human platelets. Results: Radioligand‐binding studies demonstrated that ticagrelor binds potently and reversibly to human P2Y₁₂ with K_on and K_off of (1.1 ± 0.2) × 10^?4 nm ^?1 s^?1 and (8.7 ± 1.4) × 10^?4 s^?1, respectively. Ticagrelor does not displace [³H]ADP from the receptor (K_i > 10 μm ) but binds competitively with [³³P]2MeS‐ADP (K_i = 4.3 ± 1.3 nm ) and [¹²⁵I]AZ11931285 (K_i = 0.33 ± 0.04 nm ), and shows apparent non‐competitive inhibition of ADP‐induced signaling but competitive inhibition of 2MeS‐ADP‐induced signaling. Binding studies on membranes prepared from human washed platelets demonstrated similar non‐competitive binding for ADP and ticagrelor. Conclusions: These data indicate that P2Y₁₂ is targeted by ticagrelor via a mechanism that is non‐competitive with ADP, suggesting the existence of an independent receptor‐binding site for CPTPs.     

Aspirin has little additional anti‐platelet effect in healthy volunteers receiving prasugrel

Summary. Background: Strong P2Y₁₂ blockade, as can be achieved with novel anti‐platelet agents such as prasugrel, has been shown in vitro to inhibit both ADP and thromboxane A₂‐mediated pathways of platelet aggregation, calling into question the need for the concomitant use of aspirin. Objective: The present study investigated the hypothesis that aspirin provides little additional anti‐aggregatory effect in a group of healthy volunteers taking prasugrel. Study participants/methods: In all, 9 males, aged 18 to 40 years, enrolled into the 21‐day study. Prasugrel was loaded at 60 mg on day 1 and maintained at 10 mg until day 21. At day 8, aspirin 75 mg was introduced and the dose increased to 300 mg on day 15. On days 0, 7, 14 and 21, platelet function was assessed by aggregometry, response to treatments was determined by VerifyNow? and urine samples were collected for quantification of prostanoid metabolites. Results: At day 7, aggregation responses to a range of platelet agonists were reduced and there was only a small further inhibition of aggregation to TRAP‐6, collagen and epinephrine at days 14 and 21, when aspirin was included with prasugrel. Urinary prostanoid metabolites were unaffected by prasugrel, and were reduced by the addition of aspirin, independent of dose. Conclusions: In healthy volunteers, prasugrel produces a strong anti‐aggregatory effect, which is little enhanced by the addition of aspirin. The addition of aspirin as a dual‐therapy with potent P2Y₁₂ receptor inhibitors warrants further investigation.     

Bleeding tendency and impaired platelet function in a patient carrying a heterozygous mutation in the thromboxane A2 receptor

Summary. Background: Thromboxane A₂ receptor (TXA₂R) abnormality appears to dominantly disturb platelet function. Objectives: To reveal a molecular genetic defect in a patient with TXA₂R abnormality and investigate the mechanism for the impaired response to TXA₂. Patient: The proband (OSP‐2, PT) was a 7‐year‐old Japanese girl, suffering from repeated mucocutaneous bleeding. Methods and results: U46619 (2.5 and 10 μm )‐induced platelet aggregation was remarkably impaired in the proband and her father. Immunoblots showed that TXA₂R expression levels in their platelets were approximately 50% of controls, and nucleotide sequence analysis revealed that they were heterozygous for a novel mutation, c.167dupG in the TXA₂R cDNA. Expression studies using Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells indicated that the mutation is responsible for the expression defect in TXA₂R. We then examined α_IIbβ₃ activation by employing an initial velocity analysis and revealed that U46619 failed to induce a sustained α_IIbβ₃ and Rap1B activation in the proband. In addition, platelet secretion as monitored by P‐selectin expression was markedly impaired in response to U46619 but not to ADP. The interaction between secreted ADP and P2Y₁₂ has been shown to play a critical role in the sustained α_IIbβ₃ activation (Kamae et al. J Thromb Haemost 2006; 4 : 1379). As expected, small amounts of exogenous ADP (0.5 μm ) partially restored the sustained α_IIbβ₃ activation induced by U46619. Conclusion: Our present data strongly suggest that the impaired platelet activation in response to U46619 in the heterozygous subject for the TXA₂R mutation is, at least in part, as a result of the decrease in ADP secretion.     

Thromboxane Antagonism with terutroban in Peripheral Arterial Disease: the TAIPAD study

Summary. Background: Terutroban is a selective prostaglandin endoperoxide (TP) receptor antagonist with antithrombotic, antivasoconstrictive and antiatherosclerotic properties and is currently in development for long‐term cardiovascular secondary prevention. Objectives: TAIPAD is an international, double‐blind, randomized controlled study comparing the effects of five dosages of oral terutroban vs. aspirin and placebo on platelet aggregation in peripheral arterial disease (PAD) patients. Patients/methods: After 10 day’s placebo run‐in, included patients (n = 435; ankle‐brachial pressure index, 0.7 ± 0.1) were randomly allocated to aspirin 75 mg day^?1, terutroban 1, 2.5, 5, 10 or 30 mg day^?1 or placebo. On day 5, the placebo group was reallocated to one of the terutroban groups for the rest of the study (day 83). Ex vivo platelet aggregation induced by the thromboxane analog U46619 (7 μm ) was measured 24 h after dosing, as well as platelet aggregation induced by arachidonic acid (AA), collagen and ADP. Results: Terutroban dose‐dependently inhibited U46619‐induced platelet aggregation at days 5 and 83. At day 5, the inhibition was significant vs. placebo for all terutroban dosages (P < 0.001). Terutroban (5, 10 and 30 mg day^?1) was at least as effective as aspirin in inhibiting platelet aggregation induced by arachidonic acid (AA), collagen and adenosine diphosphate (ADP). Terutroban was well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to aspirin. Conclusions: In PAD patients, terutroban dose‐dependently inhibited platelet aggregation 24 h after dosing, and was at least as effective as aspirin at 5, 10 and 30 mg day^?1. Terutroban was well tolerated.     

Earlier recovery of platelet function after discontinuation of treatment with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with high antiplatelet responses

Summary. Background: The rate of recovery of platelet function after discontinuation of P2Y₁₂ inhibitors depends on the reversibility of the antiplatelet effect and the extent of the on‐treatment response. P2Y₁₂ inhibition increases the bleeding risk in patients requiring surgery. Objectives: To evaluate recovery of platelet function after discontinuation of ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in stable coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with high levels of platelet inhibition (HPI) during the ONSET/OFFSET study. Methods: Patients received aspirin 75–100 mg per day and either ticagrelor 90 mg twice‐daily or clopidogrel 75 mg daily for 6 weeks. This subanalysis included patients with HPI after the last dose of maintenance therapy, defined as: inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) > 75% 4 h post‐dose (ADP 20 μm , final extent); < 120 P2Y₁₂ reaction units 8 h post‐dose (VerifyNow P2Y₁₂ assay); or platelet reactivity index < 50% 8 h post‐dose (VASP‐P assay). Results: IPA > 75% was observed in 39 out of 47 ticagrelor‐treated and 17 out of 44 clopidogrel‐treated patients. The rate of offset of IPA over 4–72 h was greater with ticagrelor (IPA %/hour slope: ?1.11 vs. ?0.67 for clopidogrel; P < 0.0001). Mean IPA was significantly lower with ticagrelor than clopidogrel between 48 and 168 h post‐dose (P < 0.01). Similar findings were observed with the other assays. The average time for IPA to decline from 30% to 10% was 50.8 h with ticagrelor vs. 110.4 h with clopidogrel. Conclusions: In patients with HPI, recovery of platelet function was more rapid after discontinuation of ticagrelor than clopidogrel leading to significantly greater platelet reactivity by 48 h after the last dose in the ticagrelor group.     

Reversal of the anti‐platelet effects of aspirin and clopidogrel

Summary. Background: Guidelines recommend stopping aspirin and clopidogrel 7 to 10 days before surgery to allow time for replacement of permanently inhibited platelets by newly released uninhibited platelets.Objectives: The purpose of the present study was to determine the rate of offset of the anti‐platelet effects of aspirin and clopidogrel after stopping treatment and the proportion of untreated donor platelets that are required to reverse their anti‐platelet effects.Methods: Cohort 1 consisted of 15 healthy subjects who received aspirin 81 mg day^?1 or clopidogrel 75 mg day^?1 for 7 days and underwent serial blood sampling until platelet function testing results normalized. Cohort 2 consisted of 36 healthy subjects who received aspirin 325 mg day^?1, clopidogrel 75 mg day^?1, aspirin 81 mg day^?1 plus clopidogrel 75 mg day^?1 or no treatment for 7 days and underwent a single blood sampling.Results: In cohort 1, arachidonic acid (AA)‐induced light transmission aggregation (LTA) returned to baseline levels in all subjects within 4 days of stopping aspirin, coinciding with the partial recovery of plasma thromboxane B₂ concentrations. ADP‐induced LTA did not return to baseline levels until 10 days after stopping clopidogrel. In cohort 2, AA‐induced LTA in patient treated with aspirin reached control levels after mixing with 30% untreated donor platelets whereas ADP‐induced LTA in patients treated with clopidogrel reached control levels only after the addition of 90% or more donor platelets.Conclusions: Platelet aggregation recovers within 4 days of stopping aspirin but clopidogrel must be stopped for 10 days to achieve a normal aggregatory response.     

Enhanced antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel in patients whose platelets are least inhibited by aspirin: a randomized crossover trial

Summary. Objective: We aimed to determine whether adding clopidogrel to aspirin in patients at high risk of future cardiovascular events would suppress laboratory measures of the antiplatelet effects of aspirin; and have greater platelet inhibitory effects in patients with the least inhibition of platelets by aspirin. Methods: We performed a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, crossover trial, comparing clopidogrel 75 mg day^?1 versus placebo, in 36 aspirin‐treated patients with symptomatic objectively confirmed peripheral arterial disease. Results: The addition of clopidogrel to aspirin did not suppress platelet aggregation induced by arachidonic acid, urinary 11 dehydro thromboxane B₂ concentrations, or soluble markers of platelet activation markers (P‐selectin, CD40‐ligand) and inflammation (high sensitivity serum C‐reactive protein, interleukin‐6). Clopidogrel significantly inhibited platelet aggregation induced by ADP (reduction 26.2%; 95% CI: 21.3–31.1%, P < 0.0001) and collagen (reduction 6.2%; 95% CI: 3.2–9.3%, P = 0.0003). The greatest inhibition of collagen‐induced platelet aggregation by clopidogrel was seen in patients with the least inhibition of arachidonic acid induced aggregation by aspirin [lower tertile of arachidonic acid‐induced platelet aggregation: 2.8% (95% CI: ?0.8 to 6.3%) reduction in mean collagen‐induced aggregation by clopidogrel; middle tertile: 4.0% (95% CI: 0.4–7.6%); upper tertile 12.6% (95% CI: 4.5–20.8%); P‐value for interaction 0.01]. Conclusions: The greatest platelet inhibitory effect of clopidogrel occurs in patients with the least inhibition of arachidonic acid‐induced platelet aggregation by aspirin. This raises the possibility that the clinical benefits of adding clopidogrel to aspirin may be greatest in patients whose platelets are least inhibited by aspirin. Confirmation in clinical outcome studies may allow these patients to be targeted with antiplatelet drugs that inhibit the ADP receptor, thereby overcoming the problem of laboratory aspirin resistance.     

Potentiating role of Gas6 and Tyro3, Axl and Mer (TAM) receptors in human and murine platelet activation and thrombus stabilization

Summary. Background: Interaction of murine Gas6 with the platelet Gas6 receptors Tyro3, Axl and Mer (TAM) plays an important role in arterial thrombus formation. However, a role for Gas6 in human platelet activation has been questioned. Objective: To determine the role of Gas6 in human and murine platelet activation and thrombus formation. Methods and Results: Gas6 levels appeared to be 20‐fold higher in human plasma than in platelets, suggesting a predominant role of plasma‐derived Gas6. Human Gas6 synergizes with ADP–P2Y₁₂ by enhancing and prolonging the phosphorylation of Akt. Removal of Gas6 from plasma impaired ADP‐induced platelet aggregation. Under flow conditions, absence of human Gas6 provoked gradual platelet disaggregation and integrin α_IIbβ₃ inactivation. Recombinant human Gas6 reversed the effects of Gas6 removal. In mouse blood, deficiency in Gas6 or in one of the TAM receptors led to reduced thrombus formation and increased disaggregation, which was completely antagonized by external ADP. In contrast, collagen‐induced platelet responses were unchanged by the absence of Gas6 in both human and mouse systems. Conclusions: The ADP–P2Y₁₂ and Gas6–TAM activation pathways synergize to achieve persistent α_IIbβ₃ activation and platelet aggregation. We postulate a model of thrombus stabilization in which plasma Gas6, by signaling via the TAM receptors, extends and enhances the platelet‐stabilizing effect of autocrine ADP, particularly when secretion becomes limited.     

Standardization of light transmittance aggregometry for monitoring antiplatelet therapy: an adjustment for platelet count is not necessary

Summary. Background: Light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) is considered to be the ‘gold standard’ of platelet function testing. As LTA has been poorly standardized, we analyzed the results of LTA in healthy subjects and patients with antiplatelet therapy using different concentrations of agonists and performing tests in non‐adjusted and platelet count‐adjusted platelet‐rich plasma (PRP). Methods: LTA was performed in 20 healthy subjects and in patients treated with aspirin (n = 30) or clopidogrel (n = 30) monotherapy, as well as in patients on combination therapy (n = 20), using arachidonic acid (ARA 0.25 and 0.5 mg mL⁻¹) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP 2 and 5 μm ) as agonists and performing platelet function tests in non‐adjusted and platelet count (250 nL⁻¹ ± 10%)‐adjusted PRP. Results: The overall platelet aggregation response is decreased after adjusting the PRP for platelet count compared with measurements in unadjusted PRP. The variability of aggregation results is high in adjusted PRP in the subgroup of healthy subjects, ranging from 9.2–95.3% (5th–95th percentile) relative to 77.6–95.5% in non‐adjusted PRP when determining maximum aggregation to ARA 0.5 mg mL⁻¹. Late aggregation using ADP 2 μm ranges from 3.8–89.9% in adjusted PRP compared with 42.9–92.5% in non‐adjusted PRP. Maximum aggregation using ARA 0.5 mg mL⁻¹ in non‐adjusted PRP differentiates between aspirin‐treated patients and healthy controls well, whereas late aggregation using ADP 2 μm in non‐adjusted PRP offers the best discrimination between clopidogrel‐treated patients and healthy controls. Conclusion: Adjustment of PRP for platelet count does not provide any advantage and therefore the time‐consuming process of platelet count adjustment is not necessary.     

Decreased platelet inhibition by P2Y12 receptor blockers in anaemia

Background

Anaemic patients undergoing angioplasty and stenting are at an increased risk of ischaemic events, which may be caused by an inadequate response to antiplatelet therapy with adenosine diphosphate (ADP) P2Y₁₂ inhibitors. In the current study, we investigated the associations between anaemia and on‐treatment platelet reactivity in clopidogrel‐treated (group 1, n = 306) and prasugrel‐/ticagrelor‐treated (group 2, n = 109) patients undergoing elective and acute angioplasty with stent implantation, respectively.

Materials and methods

Monocyte‐platelet aggregate (MPA) formation was determined by flow cytometry in both groups. On‐treatment residual platelet reactivity in response to ADP was assessed by light transmission aggregometry (LTA) in both groups, and by the VerifyNow P2Y₁₂ assay and the Impact‐R in group 1. P‐selectin expression was measured by flow cytometry in group 2.

Results

In both groups, anaemia was associated with significantly higher MPA formation in response to ADP (both P ≤ .02). Moreover, by LTA maximal aggregation in response to ADP was significantly higher in patients with anaemia in both groups (both P < .05), and anaemic patients in group 1 had a significantly higher on‐treatment platelet reactivity by the VerifyNow P2Y₁₂ assay and the Impact‐R than those without anaemia (both P < .001). In group 2, significantly higher platelet surface expression of P‐selectin was seen in anaemia after stimulation with ADP (P = .02).

Conclusion

Anaemia is associated with decreased platelet inhibition by ADP P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonists after elective and acute percutaneous interventions with stent implantation. However, due to inconsistencies between different platelet function tests additional data are needed to clarify the role of anaemia for platelet inhibition.     

Effect of platelet turnover on whole blood platelet aggregation in patients with coronary artery disease

Summary. Background: Previous studies have demonstrated considerable variation in the antiplatelet effect of aspirin. Objectives: To investigate the impact of platelet turnover on the antiplatelet effect of aspirin in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and to identify determinants of platelet turnover. Methods: Platelet turnover was evaluated by measurements of immature platelets and thrombopoietin in 177 stable CAD patients on aspirin monotherapy, including 85 type 2 diabetics and 92 non‐diabetics. Whole blood platelet aggregation was determined using the VerifyNow^® Aspirin test and multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA, Multiplate^®) induced by arachidonic acid (AA) (1.0 mm ), adenosine diphosphate (ADP) (10 μm ) and collagen (1.0 μg mL^?1). Results: Immature platelet levels significantly correlated with MEA (r = 0.31–0.36, P‐values < 0.0001) and the platelet activation marker sP‐selectin (r = 0.19, P = 0.014). Contrary to the VerifyNow^® test, MEA significantly correlated with variations in platelet count (r = 0.45–0.68, P‐values < 0.0001). Among patients with residual platelet reactivity according to AA, there were significantly more diabetics (61% vs. 41%, P = 0.027) and higher levels of sP‐selectin (77.7 ± 29 vs. 70.2 ± 25 ng mL^?1, P = 0.070) and serum thromboxane B₂ (0.81 [0.46; 1.70] vs. 0.56 [0.31; 1.12] ng mL^?1, P = 0.034). In a multivariate regression analysis, immature platelet levels were determined by thrombopoietin levels (P < 0.001), smoking (P = 0.020) and type 2 diabetes (P = 0.042). Conclusions: The antiplatelet effect of aspirin was reduced in CAD patients with an increased platelet turnover. Once‐daily dosing of aspirin might not suffice to adequately inhibit platelet aggregation in patients with an increased platelet turnover.     

P2Y12 protects platelets from apoptosis via PI3k‐dependent Bak/Bax inactivation

Summary. Background: Platelet ADP receptor P2Y₁₂ is well studied and recognized as a key player in platelet activation, hemostasis and thrombosis. However, the role of P2Y₁₂ in platelet apoptosis remains unknown. Objectives: To evaluate the role of the P2Y₁₂ receptor in platelet apoptosis. Methods: We used flow cytometry and Western blotting to assess apoptotic events in platelets treated with ABT‐737 or ABT‐263, and stored at 37 °C, combined with P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonists or P2Y₁₂‐deficient mice. Results: P2Y₁₂ activation attenuated apoptosis induced by ABT‐737 in human and mouse platelets in vitro, evidenced by reduced phosphatidylserine (PS) exposure, diminished depolarization of mitochondrial inner transmembrane potential (ΔΨm) and decreased caspase‐3 activation. Through increasing the phosphorylation level of Akt and Bad, and changing the interaction between different Bcl‐2 family proteins, P2Y₁₂ activation inactivated Bak/Bax. This antiapoptotic effect could be abolished by P2Y₁₂ antagonism or PI3K inhibition. We also observed the antiapoptotic effect of P2Y₁₂ activation in platelets stored at 37 °C. P2Y₁₂ activation improved the impaired activation responses of apoptotic platelets stressed by ABT‐737. In platelets from mice dosed with ABT‐263 in vivo, clopidogrel or deficiency of P2Y₁₂ receptor enhanced apoptosis along with increased Bak/Bax activation. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that P2Y₁₂ activation protects platelets from apoptosis via PI3k‐dependent Bak/Bax inactivation, which may be physiologically important to counter the proapoptotic challenge. Our findings that P2Y₁₂ blockade exaggerates platelet apoptosis induced by ABT‐263 (Navitoclax) also imply a novel drug interaction of ABT‐263 and P2Y₁₂ antagonists.     

Residual platelet thromboxane A2 and prothrombotic effects of erythrocytes are important determinants of aspirin resistance in patients with vascular disease

Background: Permanent inactivation of cyclooxygenase‐1 and inhibition of platelet thromboxane A₂ (TxA₂) constitute the main mechanisms underlying the prevention of vascular disease by aspirin. Methods and Results: We studied platelet TxA₂ synthesis and its impact on platelet reactivity and platelet–erythrocyte [platelet‐rich plasma (PRP)–RBC] interactions in 533 aspirin‐treated patients with vascular disease. Seventy aspirin‐free and 16 aspirin‐treated normal subjects were evaluated as controls. Collagen (1 μg mL^?1)‐induced platelet activation (¹⁴C‐5HT release) and recruitment (proaggregatory activity of cell‐free releasates from activated platelets) were assessed in PRP, PRP + RBC, and whole blood (WB). TxA₂ was quantified in releasates from WB. Aspirin inhibited TxA₂ synthesis and platelet function in all patients, but to different degrees. Forty‐two patients (8%) displayed partial (<95%) inhibition of TxA₂ relative to that of aspirin‐free controls. They produced >3.5 ng mL^?1 TxA₂ and had higher platelet reactivity than 491 patients who had undetectable TxA₂ or produced residual TxA₂ (R‐TxA₂; ≤3.5 ng mL^?1). Patients with R‐TxA₂ were distributed into TxA₂ quartiles. Patients in the third and fourth quartiles had significantly elevated ¹⁴C‐5HT release in PRP, which was markedly amplified in PRP + RBC and WB. TxA₂ in the fourth quartile translated into increased platelet aggregation and recruitment. Significant correlations were found between R‐TxA₂ and platelet hyperfunction. Conclusion: Biochemical markers (TxA₂ synthesis, ¹⁴C‐5HT release) and biological assays (platelet aggregation and recruitment) used to monitor the aspirin effect in a large population of patients presenting with vascular disease have evidenced the importance of R‐TxA₂ and the prothrombotic effects of RBC in aspirin resistance.