Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Long‐Term Follow‐Up Results

AF Ablation in Patients With Valvular Heart Disease . Background: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in patients with moderate valvular heart disease (VHD). Methods: In total, 534 consecutive patients who underwent AF ablation were enrolled. Patients with a history of valve surgery or other structural heart disease were excluded. Patients with clinically moderate VHD (group‐1, n = 45) were compared with those without VHD (control group‐2, n = 436). Ipsilateral pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI) was performed with a double Lasso technique in all the patients. Left atrial (LA) linear ablation was undertaken in persistent AF patients, if AF was inducible after PVAI. Results: Patients in group‐1 were significantly older and had a larger LA. PVAI was successfully achieved in all the patients. Patients in group‐1 received LA linear ablation more frequently during the index procedure. After a median of 26 months from the index procedure, the freedom from AF was significantly lower in group‐1 than group‐2 off antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) (47% vs 69%, P = 0.002). Although there were more number of total procedures in group‐1 than group‐2, the freedom from AF was lower at median 24 months after the last procedure (78% vs 87%, P = 0.038). There was no significant difference in the freedom from AF on AADs (91% vs 95%, P = 0.356) or complication rate between the 2 groups. Atrial tachycardia following the index procedure was observed more frequently in group‐1 (P = 0.001). Conclusion: The patients with VHD undergoing AF ablation are less likely to remain in sinus rhythm at long term without AADs than those without VHD. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 1193‐1198, November 2010)     

Pulmonary Vein Antral Isolation and Nonpulmonary Vein Trigger Ablation without Additional Substrate Modification for Treating Longstanding Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

PV Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. Introduction: Effectiveness of antral pulmonary vein isolation (PVAI) and ablation of non‐PV triggers (non‐PVTA) in controlling longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been reported. We sought to describe clinical outcomes with this ablation strategy in patients (pts) followed for at least 1 year. Methods: Two hundred pts underwent PVAI for longstanding persistent AF and were followed for recurrence. Thirty‐three pts with <1‐year follow‐up and 37 pts with additional RF atrial ablation were excluded, leaving 130 pts for analysis. Results: All 130 pts (108 men, mean LA 4.7 ± 0.6 cm, mean AF duration of 38 ± 44 months) underwent PVAI with entrance/exit block. In addition, 24 pts (15 pts during the initial procedure and 9 additional pts at repeat ablations) had 40 non‐PVTA, including 3 with AVNRT. During follow‐up, atrial flutter (AFL) was noted in 7 (5%) pts. The AF‐free survival after single procedure without antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) was 38%. Repeat AF or AFL ablation was performed in 37 pts (28%) with PV reconnection uniformly identified (3.7 ± 0.5 veins/pt). During mean follow‐up of 41.1 ± 23.8 months (range 12–103 months), 85/130 pts (65%) were in sinus rhythm with 65 pts (50%) off AAD, 20 pts (15%) on AAD. Additionally, 9 pts (7%) have had rare episodes of AF such that 72% of pts have had good long‐term clinical outcome. Of the 36 pts with recurrent AF, 20 pts have not had a repeat procedure. Conclusions: PVAI with non‐PVTA for longstanding persistent AF provides good long‐term AF control in over 70% of patients with infrequent (5%) AFL. AAD therapy and repeat PVAI may be required for this optimal outcome. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 23, pp. 806‐813, August 2012)     

Acute and Long‐Term Clinical Outcome After Endoscopic Pulmonary Vein Isolation: Results from the First Prospective,Multicenter Study

Clinical Outcome After Endoscopic PVI. Introduction: The acute and long‐term outcome of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using an endoscopic ablation system (EAS) has only been reported in single‐center studies. The current prospective, multicenter study assessed the acute and 1‐year outcome following PVI using the EAS. Methods and Results: Seventy‐two patients (34 female, mean age 58 ± 10 years) with a history (5 ± 6 years) of drug‐refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) were included. Endoscopic PVI was performed in all patients. Follow‐up was based on regular telephone interviews, Holter ECG, and transtelephonic ECG recordings. Recurrence was defined as a symptomatic and/or documented AF episode >30 seconds following a blanking period of 3 months. In 72 patients, a total of 281 pulmonary veins (PVs) were targeted and 277/281 (98.6%) PVs were isolated successfully using only the EAS. PV stenosis, thrombembolic events, pericardial effusion, pericardial tamponade, and phrenic nerve palsy occurred in 0 of 72, 0 of 72, 3 of 72 (4.2%), 4 of 72 (5.6%), and in 1 of 72 (1.4%) patients, respectively. Sixty‐seven of 72 (93.1%) patients completed a follow‐up of 365 days and 42 of 67 (62.7%) patients remained in stable sinus rhythm after a single procedure. A total of 13 of 25 (52%) patients suffering from AF recurrence consented to repeat PVI using conventional radiofrequency energy 221 ± 121 days after the index procedure. LA to PV reconduction was found in 30 of 45 (67%) previously isolated PVs. Conclusions: A very high rate of acute electrical PVI is achieved using exclusively the EAS. The 1‐year single‐procedure success rate in patients with paroxysmal AF is comparable to conventional PVI. PV reconduction is the major determinant for AF recurrence. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 24, pp. 7‐13, January 2013)     

Clinical predictors of arrhythmia recurrences following pulmonary vein antrum isolation for atrial fibrillation: predicting arrhythmia recurrence post-PVAI

Predicting Arrhythmia Recurrence Post‐PVAI . Introduction: Pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI) is an accepted treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF) refractory to medical therapy. The purpose of this study was to identify the patient, procedural, and follow‐up factors associated with arrhythmia recurrences following PVAI. Methods and Results: Clinical data were prospectively collected on all 385 consecutive patients who had 530 PVAI (age 58 ± 11 years, 63% paroxysmal AF–PAF, follow‐up 2.8 ± 1.2 years) between February 2004 and March 2009. ECGs were recorded at each follow‐up visit with Holter monitoring 1, 3, 6, and 12 months following PVAI and every 6 months thereafter. Recurrences < 3 months post‐PVAI were defined as early, 3 months—1 year post‐PVAI as late, and > 1 year post‐PVAI as very late. Relationship between predictor variables and outcomes was modeled using Cox proportional hazards analysis. Late recurrences occurred in 42% with a lower rate among PAF versus non‐PAF patients (39% vs 56%, P = 0.001). Of the 256 patients with ≥ 1‐year follow‐up, 121 (47%) had no arrhythmia off antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) 1 year post‐PVAI; 36 (30%) of these had a very late recurrence. In multivariate analysis, non‐PAF, hypertension, and prior AAD failure predicted recurrence. When entered into the model, early recurrences remained the only predictor of late recurrences. Conclusion: Patients with non‐PAF, hypertension, and prior failure of multiple AAD were more likely to experience arrhythmia recurrence post‐PVAI. Early recurrences were the strongest predictor of late recurrences. Late and very late recurrences following PVAI were common and should be considered when planning long‐term AF patient management. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. pp. 1‐9)     

Hybrid Therapy of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation and Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Commissurotomy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Mitral Stenosis

AF Ablation and PTMC. Background: The rhythm control of atrial fibrillation (AF) associated with mitral stenosis (MS) is often difficult using antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs), even after a percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy (PTMC). Few studies have examined the efficacy and safety of simultaneously performing radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) and a PTMC in patients with MS and AF. Methods: Twenty consecutive patients with drug‐resistant AF and rheumatic MS underwent RFCA combined with a PTMC (n = 10; persistent AF‐8, long‐lasting [>1 year] persistent AF‐2; RFCA group) or transthoracic direct cardioversion (DC) following a PTMC (n = 10; persistent AF‐7, long‐lasting persistent AF‐3; DC group). In all patients, the mitral valve morphology was amenable to a PTMC, and more than 2 AADs had been ineffective in maintaining sinus rhythm (SR). In the RFCA group, a segmental pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was performed in the initial 5 patients, and an extensive PVI was performed in the remaining 5. Results: During a mean follow‐up period of 4.0 ± 2.7 years, 8 patients (80%) in the RFCA group were maintained in SR, as compared to 1 (10%) in the DC group (hazard ratio, 0.16; 95% confidence interval, 0.03 to 0.75; P = 0.008 by the log‐rank test). The prevalence of the concomitant use of class I and/or class III AADs was comparable between the 2 groups (P = 0.70). No complications occurred during the procedure or follow‐up period in either group. Conclusions: The hybrid therapy using RFCA and a PTMC was safe and feasible, and significantly improved the AF free survival rate compared to DC following a PTMC. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 284–289, March 2010)     

Preprocedural predictors of atrial fibrillation recurrence following pulmonary vein antrum isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: long-term follow-up results

Predictors of Recurrence after AF Ablation. Introduction: The objective of this study was to identify the simple preprocedural parameters of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence following single ablation procedure in patients with paroxysmal AF during long‐term follow‐up period. Methods and Results: Consecutive 474 patients (61 ± 10 years; 364 males, left atrial (LA) diameter 37.6 ± 5.1 mm) with drug‐refractory paroxysmal AF who underwent AF ablation were analyzed. Pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI), cavotricuspid isthmus line creation with bidirectional conduction block, and elimination of all non‐PV triggers of AF were performed in all patients. With a mean follow‐up of 30 ± 13 months after single procedure, 318 patients (67.1%) were in sinus rhythm without any antiarrhythmic drugs. Multivariate analysis using Cox's proportional hazards model, including the age, gender, duration of AF, body mass index, LA size, left ventricular ejection fraction, and presence of hypertension and structural heart disease as variables, demonstrated that LA size was an independent predictor of AF recurrences after PVAI with a 7.2% increase in the probability for every 1 mm increase in LA diameter (P = 0.0007). When the patients were categorized into 3 groups according to the LA diameter, the patients with moderate (40–50 mm) and severe dilatation (>50 mm) had a 1.30‐fold (P = 0.0131) and 2.14‐fold (P = 0.0057) increase, respectively, in the probability of recurrent AF as compared with the patients with normal LA diameter (≤40 mm). Conclusion : In the long‐term follow‐up period, LA size was the best preprocedural predictor of AF recurrence following single ablation procedure in the patients with paroxysmal AF, even in the patients with a relatively small LA. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 22, pp. 621‐625, June 2011)     

A Prospective,Randomized Comparison of Modified Pulmonary Vein Isolation Versus Conventional Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Modified Pulmonary Vein Isolation in AF Ablation. Introduction: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the primary ablation therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We hypothesized that high dominant frequency (DF) sites (AF nests during sinus rhythm [SR]) adjacent to the PV ostia are associated with the atrial substrate that maintains AF, and PVI incorporating the high‐frequency AF nests may have a higher efficacy. Methods and Results: In a prospective and randomized comparison, 126 symptomatic paroxysmal AF patients that underwent PVI were enrolled. We compared the efficacy of a modified PVI (ablation line: 1.0–1.5 cm from the PV ostium with encircling the AF nests [spectral analysis with DF >70 Hz during SR, Group II]) versus the anatomy‐guided conventional PVI (Group I). In Group II, the DF value along the PV ostium was lower than 70 Hz after the PVI. The primary endpoint was the freedom from symptomatic atrial arrhythmias after a single procedure. We also followed the autonomic function by a time‐domain analysis of the heart rate variability. In both groups, AF nests were observed and electric isolation was successfully obtained in all patients. With a mean duration of 16 ± 6.1 months of follow‐up, Group II had a higher single procedure efficacy without drugs (78.7% vs 66.1%, log‐rank test: P = 0.02), and fewer repeat procedures (6.6% vs 23%; P = 0.04), as compared to Group I. Conclusion: PVI incorporating the high frequency AF nests adjacent to the PV ostia had a better single procedure efficacy. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 23, pp. 1155–1162, November 2012)     

Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation at the Time of Cavotricuspid Isthmus Ablation in Patients With Atrial Flutter Without Documented Atrial Fibrillation Derives a Better Long‐Term Benefit

AF Ablation in Patients With Only Documentation of Atrial Flutter. Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate whether isolation of the pulmonary veins (PVs) at the time of cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation is beneficial in patients with lone atrial flutter (AFL). Background: A high proportion of patients with lone persistent AFL have recurrent episodes of atrial fibrillation (AF) after CTI ablation. However, the benefit of AF ablation in patients with only documentation of AFL has not been determined. Methods: Forty‐eight patients with typical lone persistent AFL (age 56 ± 6; 90% male) were randomized to CTI ablation (Group A; n = 25) or to CTI + PV isolation (PVI) (Group B; n = 23). In addition to PVI, some patients in group B underwent ablation of complex fractionated electrograms and/or creation of left atrial roof and mitral isthmus ablation line in a stepwise approach when AF was induced and sustained for more than 2 minutes. Mean follow‐up was 16 ± 4 months with a 48‐hour ambulatory monitor every 2 months. Results: There were no recurrences of AFL in either group. Six patients in group B (22%) underwent a stepwise ablation protocol. AF organized and terminated in 5 patients during ablation (83%). Complication rate was not significantly different among the groups. Twenty patients in group B (87%) and 11 patients in group A (44%) were free of arrhythmias on no medications at the end of follow‐up (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Ablation of AF at the time of CTI ablation results in a significantly better long‐term freedom from arrhythmias. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 22, pp. 34‐38, January 2011)     

Persistence of Pulmonary Vein Isolation After Robotic Remote‐Navigated Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation and its Relation to Clinical Outcome

Robotic Remote Ablation for AF . Aims: A robotic navigation system (RNS, Hansen?) has been developed as an alternative method of performing ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). Despite the growing application of RNS‐guided pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), its consequences and mechanisms of subsequent AF recurrences are unknown. We investigated the acute procedural success and persistence of PVI over time after robotic PVI and its relation to clinical outcome. Methods and Results: Sixty‐four patients (60.7 ± 9.8 years, 53 male) with paroxysmal AF underwent robotic circumferential PVI with 3‐dimensional left atrial reconstruction (NavX?). A voluntary repeat invasive electrophysiological study was performed 3 months after ablation irrespective of clinical course. Robotic PVI was successful in all patients without complication (fluoroscopy time: 23.5 [12–34], procedure time: 180 [150–225] minutes). Fluoroscopy time demonstrated a gradual decline but was significantly reduced after the 30th patient following the introduction of additional navigation software (34 [29–45] vs 12 [9–17] minutes; P < 0.001). A repeat study at 3 months was performed in 63% of patients and revealed electrical conduction recovery in 43% of all PVs. Restudied patients without AF recurrence (n = 28) showed a significantly lower number of recovered PVs (1 (0–2) vs 2 (2–3); P = 0.006) and a longer LA‐PV conduction delay than patients with AF recurrences (n = 12). Persistent block of all PVs was associated with freedom from AF in all patients. At 3 months, 67% of patients were free of AF, while reablation of recovered PVs led to an overall freedom from AF in 81% of patients after 1 year. Conclusion: Robotic PVI for PAF is safe, effective, and requires limited fluoroscopy while yielding comparable success rates to conventional ablation approaches with PV reconduction as a common phenomenon associated with AF recurrences. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 1079‐1084)     

Does Adenosine Response Predict Clinical Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation After Pulmonary Vein Isolation?

Does Adenosine Response Predict Clinical Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation. Background: Approximately 30% of patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF) have clinical recurrence of AF, and a great majority of these patients have recovery of vein conduction. Adenosine can be associated with acute recovery of conduction to the pulmonary veins immediately after isolation. However, it is not known whether this is prognostic for permanent recovery of conduction or recurrence of AF. Methods: Patients with paroxysmal AF underwent PVI, with administration of adenosine after electrical isolation. Those with transient conduction recovery (TCR+) underwent no further ablation and were compared to those without (TCR?) for clinical AF recurrence and conduction recovery at second procedure. Results: Seventy‐two consecutive PVI patients were studied (mean age 56.7 ± 9.2, 61 male). Twenty‐five (35%) patients had transient recovery of conduction with adenosine. After 1 year, 18 patients (25%) had symptomatic recurrence of AF. In this group of 18 patients, 6 were TCR+ at initial ablation (sensitivity 33%, NPV = 74%). In the remaining group of 54 patients free from AF recurrence, 35 patients (65%) were TCR? at initial ablation (specificity 65%, PPV = 24%). All 18 patients with recurrent AF underwent repeat procedure and had at least 1 pulmonary vein with recurrent conduction. The initial adenosine test correctly predicted 13 out of 36 (36%) veins, with positive predictive value 90% and negative predictive value 15%. Conclusions: Adenosine testing for TCR does not appear to predict recurrence of clinical AF. TCR? veins remain susceptible to conduction recovery, as determined at the follow‐up procedure. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 22, pp. 982‐986, September 2011)     

Characteristics and significance of very early recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation

Very Early Recurrence of AF. Introduction: Early restoration of sinus rhythm following ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) facilitates reverse atrial remodeling and improves the long‐term outcome. The purpose of this study was to determine the predictors and outcome in patients with very early AF recurrences (< 2 days). Methods and Results: Ablation was performed in 339 consecutive AF patients (paroxysmal AF = 262). Biatrial voltage was mapped during sinus rhythm. If recurrent AF occurred within 2 days following the ablation, electrical cardioversion was performed to restore sinus rhythm. Very early recurrences of AF occurred in 39 (15%) patients with paroxysmal AF and 26 (34%) with nonparoxysmal AF. Patients with very early recurrence had a higher incidence of nonparoxysmal AF (40% vs 18.6%, P< 0.001), requirement of electrical cardioversion during procedure, larger left atrial (LA) diameter (43 ± 7 vs 39 ± 6 mm, P< 0.001), lower left ventricular ejection fraction (54 ± 10% vs 59 ± 7, P< 0.001), longer procedural time, and lower LA voltage (1.5 ± 0.7 vs 1.9 ± 0.8 mV, P< 0.001). A multivariate analysis revealed that the independent predictors of a very early recurrence were a longer procedural time and lower LA voltage. During a follow‐up of 13 ± 5 months, a very early recurrence did not predict the long‐term outcome of a single procedure recurrence in the patients with paroxysmal AF, but was associated with a late recurrence in the nonparoxysmal AF patients. Conclusion: Very early recurrence occurred in patients with paroxysmal AF is not associated with long‐term recurrence. Nonparoxysmal AF is an independent predictor of late recurrence of AF in patients with very early recurrence. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. pp. 1‐6)     

Time to Cardioversion of Recurrent Atrial Arrhythmias After Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation and Long‐Term Clinical Outcome

Introduction: It is unclear whether early restoration of sinus rhythm in patients with persistent atrial arrhythmias after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) facilitates reverse atrial remodeling and promotes long‐term maintenance of sinus rhythm. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the time to restoration of sinus rhythm after a recurrence of an atrial arrhythmia and long‐term maintenance of sinus rhythm after radiofrequency catheter ablation of AF. Methods and Results: Radiofrequency catheter ablation was performed in 384 consecutive patients (age 60 ± 9 years) for paroxysmal (215 patients) or persistent AF (169 patients). Transthoracic cardioversion was performed in all 93 patients (24%) who presented with a persistent atrial arrhythmia: AF (n = 74) or atrial flutter (n = 19) at a mean of 51 ± 53 days from the recurrence of atrial arrhythmia and 88 ± 72 days from the ablation procedure. At a mean of 16 ± 10 months after the ablation procedure, 25 of 93 patients (27%) who underwent cardioversion were in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic therapy. Among the 46 patients who underwent cardioversion at ≤30 days after the recurrence, 23 (50%) were in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic therapy. On multivariate analysis of clinical variables, time to cardioversion within 30 days after the onset of atrial arrhythmia was the only independent predictor of maintenance of sinus rhythm in the absence of antiarrhythmic drug therapy after a single ablation procedure (OR 22.5; 95% CI 4.87–103.88, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Freedom from AF/flutter is achieved in approximately 50% of patients who undergo cardioversion within 30 days of a persistent atrial arrhythmia after catheter ablation of AF.     

Catheter Ablation of Long‐Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Lesson from Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation

Catheter Ablation of Long‐Standing Persistent AF. Introduction: Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) is associated with a high success rate in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, in patients with long‐standing persistent AF, the ideal ablation strategy still remains a matter of debate. Methods and Results: Two‐hundred and five patients underwent catheter ablation for long‐standing persistent AF defined as continuous AF of more than 1‐year duration. In a first step, all patients underwent CPVI. If direct‐current cardioversion failed following CPVI, ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) was performed. The goal was conversion into sinus rhythm (SR) or, alternatively, atrial tachycardia (AT) with subsequent ablation. A total of 340 procedures were performed. CPVI alone was performed during 165 procedures in 124 of 205 (60.5%) patients. In the remaining 81 patients, additional CFAE ablation was performed in 45, left linear lesions for recurrent ATs in 44 and SVC isolation in 15 patients, respectively, resulting in inadvertent left atrial appendage isolation in 9 (4.4%) patients. After the initial ablation procedure, 67 of 199 patients remained in SR during a mean follow‐up of 19 ± 11 months. Six patients were lost to follow‐up. After a mean of 1.7 ± 0.8 procedures, 135 of 199 patients (67.8%) remained in SR. Eighty‐six patients (43.2%) remained in SR following CPVI performed as the sole ablative strategy. Conclusions: CPVI alone is sufficient to restore SR in 43.2% of patients with long‐standing persistent AF. Multiple procedures and additional ablation strategies with a significant risk of inadvertent left atrial appendage isolation are often required to maintain stable SR. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 1085‐1093)     

Cryoballoon Versus Radiofrequency for Pulmonary Vein Re‐Isolation After a Failed Initial Ablation Procedure in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Cryoballoon versus Radiofrequency Ablation . Aim: Catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) is associated with an important risk of early and late recurrence, necessitating repeat ablation procedures. The aim of this prospective randomized patient‐blind study was to compare the efficacy and safety of cryoballoon (Cryo) versus radiofrequency (RF) ablation of PAF after failed initial RF ablation procedure. Methods: Patients with a history of symptomatic PAF after a previous failed first RF ablation procedure were eligible for this study. Patients were randomized to Cryo or RF redo ablation. The primary endpoint of the study was recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia, including AF and left atrial flutter/tachycardia, after a second ablation procedure at 1 year of follow‐up. All patients were implanted with a cardiac monitor (Reveal XT, Medtronic) to continuously track the cardiac rhythm. Patients with an AF burden (AF%) ≤ 0.5% were considered AF‐free (Responders), while those with an AF% > 0.5% were classified as patients with AF recurrences (non‐Responders). Results: Eighty patients with AF recurrences after a first RF pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) were randomized to Cryo (N = 40) or to RF (N = 40). Electrical potentials were recorded in 77 mapped PVs (1.9 ± 0.8 per patient) in Cryo Group and 72 PVs (1.7 ± 0.8 per patient) in RF Group (P = 0.62), all of which were targeted. In Cryo group, 68 (88%) of the 77 PVs were re‐isolated using only Cryo technique; the remaining 9 PVs were re‐isolated using RF. In RF group, all 72 PVs were successfully re‐isolated (P = 0.003 vs Cryo). By intention‐to‐treat, 23 (58%) RF patients were AF‐free vs 17 (43%) Cryo patients on no antiarrhythmic drugs at 1 year (P = 0.06). Three patients had temporary phrenic nerve paralysis in the Cryo group; the RF group had no complications. Of the 29 patients who had only Cryo PVI without any RF ablation, 11 (38%) were AF‐free vs 20 (59%) of the 34 patients who had RF only (P = 0.021). Conclusion: When patients require a redo pulmonary vein isolation ablation procedure for recurrent PAF, RF appears to be the preferred energy source relative to Cryo. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 24, pp. 274‐279, March 2013)     

Intracardiac Echocardiography Improves Procedural Efficiency During Cryoballoon Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Pilot Study

Intracardiac Echocardiography Guided Cryoballoon Ablation. Background: Cryoballoon ablation is increasingly used for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This new technique aims to perform PVI safer and faster. However, procedure and fluoroscopy times were similar to conventional RF approaches. We compared ICE plus fluoroscopy versus fluoroscopy alone for anatomical guidance of PVI. Methods: Forty‐three consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF were randomly assigned to ICE plus fluoroscopy (n = 22) versus fluoroscopy alone (n = 21) for guidance of cryoballoon PVI. A “single big balloon” procedure using a 28 mm cryoballoon was performed. The optimal ICE‐guided position of the cryoballoon was assessed by full ostial occlusion and loss of Doppler coded reflow to the left atrium (LA). Any further freezes were ICE‐guided only without use of fluoroscopy or contrast media injection. Results: A total of 171 pulmonary veins could be visualized with ICE. 80% of ICE‐guided freezes were performed with excellent ICE quality. Acute procedural success and AF recurrence rate at 6 months were similar in both groups (AF recurrence: ICE‐guided = 27% vs Fluoroscopy = 33%; P = ns). Patients without ICE guidance had significantly longer procedure (143 ± 27 minutes vs 130 ± 19 minutes; P = 0.05) and fluoroscopy times (42 ± 13 minutes vs 26 ± 10, P = 0.01). The total amount of contrast used during the procedure was significantly lower in patients with ICE guidance (88 ± 31 mL vs 169 ± 38 mL, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Additional ICE guidance appears to be associated with lower fluoroscopy, contrast, and procedure times, with similar efficacy rates. Specifically, ICE allows for better identification of the PV LA junction and more precise anatomically guided cryoballoon ablations. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 1202‐1207, November 2010)     

Randomized comparison between pulmonary vein antral isolation versus complex fractionated electrogram ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Catheter Ablation of Paroxysmal AF. Introduction: Circumferential pulmonary vein antral isolation (PVAI) and atrial complex fractionated electrograms (CFEs) are both ablative techniques for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). However, data on the comparative value of these 2 ablation strategies are very limited. Methods and Results: We randomized 118 patients with drug‐refractory PAF to receive PVAI ablation (n = 60) or CFE ablation (n = 58). For CFE group, spontaneous/induced AF was mapped using validated, automated software to guide ablation until all CFE areas were eliminated. For PVAI group, all 4 pulmonary vein antra were electrically isolated as confirmed by circular mapping catheter. Patients with spontaneous/inducible AF after the initial ablation procedure were crossed over to the other arms. After initial ablation procedure, AF persisted/inducible in 24/59 patients (41%), and 34/58 patients (59%) assigned to PVAI and CFE ablation, respectively (P = 0.05). Then 58 patients underwent PVAI + CFE ablation. After 22.6 ± 6.4 months, PVAI ablation group was more likely than CFE ablation group to achieve control of any AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) off drugs (43/60, 72% vs 33/58, 57%, P = 0.075) and lower recurrence rate of AT (11.9% vs 34.5%, P = 0.004). Patients who received CFE ablation alone (38%) had significantly lower overall success rate to achieve control of AF/AT off drugs compared with patients who received PVAI ablation (77%, P = 0.002) alone or PVAI + CFE ablation (69%, P = 0.008) due to higher recurrence rate of AT (50% vs 6% vs 13%, P < 0.01). Conclusions: CFE ablation in PAF patients was associated with higher occurrence rate of postprocedure AT compared with PVAI ablation, whereby making it less likely to be a sole ablation strategy for PAF patients. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 22, pp. 973‐981, September 2011)     

Impact of adenosine-provoked acute dormant pulmonary vein conduction on recurrence of atrial fibrillation

Impact of ATP Reconduction on AF Recurrence. Introduction: Adenosine can be associated with acute recovery of conduction to the pulmonary veins (PVs) immediately after isolation. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the response to adenosine predicts atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after a single ablation procedure in patients with paroxysmal AF. Methods and Results: A total of 109 consecutive patients (61 ± 10 years; 91 males) with drug‐refractory paroxysmal AF who underwent AF ablation were analyzed. After PV antrum isolation (PVAI), dormant PV conduction was evaluated by an administration of adenosine in all patients. No acute reconnections were provoked by the adenosine in 70 (64.2%) patients (Group‐1), but they were provoked in at least one side of the ipsilateral PVs in 39 (35.8%) patients (Group‐2). All adenosine‐provoked dormant conductions were successfully eliminated by additional ablation applications. By 12 months after the initial procedure, 72 (66.1%) patients were free of AF recurrences without any antiarrhythmic drugs. A Cox regression multivariate analysis of the variables including the adenosine‐provoked reconductions, age, gender, duration of AF, presence of hypertension or structural heart disease, left atrial size, left ventricular ejection fraction, and body mass index demonstrated that adenosine‐provoked reconductions were an independent predictor of AF recurrence after a single ablation procedure (hazard ratio: 1.387; 95% confidence interval: 1.018–1.889, P = 0.038). At the repeat session for recurrent AF, conduction recovery was observed similarly in both groups (P = 0.27). Conclusion: Even after the elimination of any adenosine‐provoked dormant PV conduction, the appearance of acute adenosine‐provoked reconduction after the PVAI was an independent predictor of AF recurrence after a single AF ablation procedure. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 23 p. 256‐260, March 2012.)     

Relationship between complex fractionated electrograms (CFE) and dominant frequency (DF) sites and prospective assessment of adding DF-guided ablation to pulmonary vein isolation in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF)

Dominant Frequency Mapping and Ablation . Background: Sites of high DF are potential targets for AF ablation, but it is unknown if addition of DF ablation can improve procedural outcome. Objectives: We sought to (1) examine the relationship between DF sites and complex fractionated electrograms (CFE) and (2) prospectively assess the long‐term outcome of adding DF ablation to pulmonary vein antral isolation (PVAI) for persistent AF. Methods: First, 20 patients with persistent AF who underwent previous CFE‐guided ablation and who had AF terminate during ablation were studied retrospectively (group I). Bipolar, 8‐second electrograms were collected by a circular catheter (288 ± 86 points/map). The EnSite NavX system allows for automated display of both CFE and DF maps. Electrograms with cycle length <120 ms were considered CFE and were compared to DF sites > 8 Hz (direct inverse relationship). Sites of AF termination were related to CFE and DF sites. Based on these observations, 30 different patients (group II) with persistent AF prospectively underwent DF‐guided ablation plus PVAI. They were followed every 3 months for 1 year (visit, Holter, ECG). These patients were compared to case‐matched controls undergoing PVAI alone (group III). Results: In group I, there was a significant, inverse correlation between DF and CFE values at each point (r =–0.24, P < 0.001). DF surface area was less than CFE area (27 ± 5 cm² vs 34 ± 4 cm², P = 0.03). CFE sites overlapped 48 ± 27% with the DF surface area. Nonoverlapping CFE sites were contiguous to DF sites. AF termination occurred where DF and CFE overlapped, and at these sites, DF was always greater than the mean DF for the map. In group II, all DF sites above the mean value were prospectively ablated during AF. AF termination was noted in only 2/30 (7%) patients. After DF ablation, PVAI was performed and termination increased to 4/30 patients (14%). At 1 year, freedom from atrial arrhythmia > 30 seconds occurred in 57% of DF+PVAI compared to 60% in patients receiving PVAI alone (P = 0.18). Conclusions: DF and CFE regions overlap only about 50%. AF termination retrospectively occurred on overlapping CFE/DF sites where DF was above the mean. However, prospective ablation of DF sites plus PVAI resulted in low AF termination rates, and did not improve 1 year success over PVAI alone. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 22, pp. 1309‐1316, December 2011)     

Efficacy of adjuvant anterior left atrial ablation during intracardiac echocardiography-guided pulmonary vein antrum isolation for atrial fibrillation

Background: Recent data have shown that the septum and anterior left atrial (LA) wall may contain “rotor” sites required for AF maintenance. However, whether adding ablation of such sites to standard ICE‐guided PVAI improves outcome is not well known. Objective: To determine if adjuvant anterior LA ablation during PVAI improves the cure rate of paroxysmal and permanent AF. Methods: One hundred AF patients (60 paroxysmal, 40 persistent/permanent) undergoing first‐time PVAI were enrolled over three months to receive adjuvant anterior LA ablation (Group I). These patients were compared with 100 randomly selected, matched first‐time PVAI controls from the preceding three months who did not receive adjuvant ablation (Group II). All 200 patients underwent ICE‐guided PVAI during which all four PV antra and SVC were isolated. In group I, a decapolar lasso catheter was used to map the septum and anterior LA wall during AF (induced or spontaneous) for continuous high‐frequency, fractionated electrograms (CFAE). Sites where CFAE were identified were ablated until the local EGM was eliminated. A complete anterior line of block was not a requisite endpoint. Patients were followed up for 12 months. Recurrence was assessed post‐PVAI by symptoms, clinic visits, and Holter at 3, 6, and 12 months. Patients also wore rhythm transmitters for the first 3 months. Recurrence was any AF/AFL >1 min occurring >2 months post‐PVAI. Results: Patients (age 56 ± 11 years, 37% female, EF 53%± 11%) did not differ in baseline characteristics between group I and II by design. Group I patients had longer procedure time (188 ± 45 min vs 162 ± 37 min) and RF duration (57 ± 12 min vs 44 ± 20 min) than group II (P < 0.05 for both). Overall recurrence occurred in 15/100 (15%) in group I and 20/100 (20%) in group II (P = 0.054). Success rates did not differ for paroxysmal patients between group I and II (87% vs 85%, respectively). However, for persistent/permanent patients, group I had a higher success rate compared with group II (82% vs 72%, P = 0.047). Conclusions: Adjuvant anterior LA ablation does not appear to impact procedural outcome in patients with paroxysmal AF but may offer benefit to patients with persistent/permanent AF.     

Incidence of atrial arrhythmias detected by permanent pacemakers (PPM) post-pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI) for atrial fibrillation (AF): correlation with symptomatic recurrence

Background: Studies examining AF recurrences post‐PVAI base recurrence on patient reporting of symptoms. However, whether asymptomatic recurrences are common is not well known. Objective: To assess the incidence of atrial tachycardia/fibrillation post‐PVAI as detected by a PPM and whether these recurrences correlate to symptomatic recurrence. Methods: Eighty‐six consecutive patients with symptomatic AF and PPMs with programmable mode‐switch capability underwent PVAI. Mode switching was programmed post‐PVAI to occur at an atrial‐sensed rate of >170 bpm. Patients were followed with clinic visits, ECG, and PPM interrogation at 1, 3, 6, and 9 months post‐PVAI. The number and duration of mode‐switching episodes (MSEs) were recorded at each visit and is presented as median (interquartile range). Results: The patients (age 57 ± 8 years, EF 54 ± 10%) had paroxysmal (65%) and persistent (35%) AF pre‐PVAI. Sensing, pacing, and lead function were normal for all PPMs at follow‐up. Of the 86 patients, 20 (23%) had AF recurrence based on symptoms. All 20 of these patients had appropriate MSEs detected. Of the 66 patients without symptomatic recurrence, 21 (32%) had MSEs detected. In 19 of these patients, MSEs were few in number, compared with patients with symptomatic recurrence (16 [4–256] vs 401 [151–2,470], P < 0.01). The durations were all <60 seconds. All of these nonsustained MSEs occurred within the first 3 months post‐PVAI, gradually decreasing over time. The other 2 of 21 remaining patients had numerous (1,343 [857–1,390]) and sustained (18 ± 12 minutes) MSEs that also persisted beyond 3 months (1 beyond 6 months). Therefore, the incidence of numerous, sustained MSEs in asymptomatic patients post‐PVAI was 2 of 66 (3%). Conclusions: Detection of atrial tachyarrhythmias by a PPM occurred in 30% of patients without symptomatic AF recurrence. Most of these episodes were <60 seconds and waned within 3 months. Sustained, asymptomatic episodes were uncommon.