A prospective study of tube- and feeding-related complications in patients receiving long-term home enteral nutrition

OBJECTIVES: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes are frequently inserted to facilitate long-term enteral nutrition. There are few studies that address long-term complications related to feeding tubes. The purpose of this study is to examine the long-term complications related to tube malfunction and the effect these have on health care use. METHODS: In this prospective study, 8 patients who were discharged home on long-term home enteral nutrition completed a diary that listed 17 potential complications related to enteral feeding devices. Subjects completed the diary on a weekly basis, noting which of the potential complications they were experiencing and the intervention related to that complication. RESULTS: The 8 patients were followed for a mean of 10.5 months. Common tube-site complications included discharge from the tube site, red or tender stoma, and granulation tissue. Mechanical problems related to tubes plugging, breaking, and falling out were also common. Despite having a dedicated nurse and dietitian to follow these patients, unscheduled health care contacts were frequent and averaged 5.4 contacts over the mean follow-up time of 10.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: In patients receiving long-term home enteral nutrition, tube and tube-feeding complications are frequent and result in significant health care use. Given the increasing use of long-term enteral nutrition, strategies and programs must be developed to assist patients and their families in managing these complications.     

Nursing administration of medication via enteral tubes in adults: a systematic review

Background Enteral tubes are frequently inserted as part of medical treatment in a wide range of patient situations. Patients with an enteral tube are cared for by nurses in a variety of settings, including general and specialised acute care areas, aged care facilities and at home. Regardless of the setting, nurses have the primary responsibility for administering medication through enteral tubes. Medication administration via an enteral tube is a reasonably common nursing intervention that entails a number of skills, including preparing the medication, verifying the tube position, flushing the tube and assessing for potential complications. If medications are not given effectively through an enteral tube, harmful consequences may result leading to increased morbidity, for example, tube occlusion, diarrhoea and aspiration pneumonia. There are resultant costs for the health-care system related to possible increased length of stay and increased use of equipment. Presently what is considered to be best practice to give medications through enteral tubes is unknown. Objectives The objective of this systematic review was to determine the best available evidence on which nursing interventions are effective in minimising the complications associated with the administration of medications via enteral tubes in adults. Nursing interventions and considerations related to medication administration included form of medication, verifying tube placement before administration, methods used to give medication, methods used to flush tubes, maintenance of tube patency and specific practices to prevent possible complications related to the administration of enteral medications. Search strategy The following databases were searched for literature reported in English only: CINAHL, MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, Current Contents/All Editions, EMBASE, Australasian Medical Index and PsychINFO. There was no date restriction applied. In addition, the reference lists of all included studies were scrutinised for other potentially relevant studies. Selection criteria Systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and RCTs that compared the effectiveness of nursing interventions and considerations used in the administration of medications via enteral tubes. Other research methods, such as non-randomised controlled trials, longitudinal studies, cohort and case control studies, were also included. Exclusion criteria included studies investigating drug-nutrient interactions or the bioavailability of specific medications. Data collection and analysis Initial consideration of potential relevance to the review was carried out by the primary author (NP). Two reviewers independently assessed study eligibility for inclusion. A meta-analysis could not be undertaken, as there were no comparable RCTs identified. All data were presented in a narrative summary. Results There is very limited evidence regarding the effectiveness of nursing interventions in minimising the complications associated with enteral tube medication administration in adults. The review highlights a lack of high quality research on many important nursing issues relating to enteral medication administration. There is huge scope for further research. Some of the evidence that was identified included that nurses should consider the use of liquid form medications as there may be fewer tube occlusions than with solid forms in nasoenteral tubes and silicone percutaneous endoscopic gastronomy tubes. Nurses may need to consider the sorbitol content of some liquid medications, for example, elixirs, as diarrhoea has been attributed to the sorbitol content of the elixir, not the drug itself. In addition, the use of 30?mL of water for irrigation when administering medications or flushing small-diameter nasoenteral tubes may reduce the number of tube occlusions.     

The solution was the problem

There are increasing numbers of adults living in the community who require enteral tube feeding. While there is significant evidence of the importance of this treatment, there are side effects which can cause difficulties for patients, their carer tabers and health professionals. Gastrointestinal complications are the most common side effects with feed formula being cited as the main culprit, often without investigating other potential causes. Many patients requiring aggressive nutrition support also require concurrent drug therapy to manage underlying disease. Drugs are often given via tubes in liquid form. These elixirs often contain large quantities of sorbitol, which will increase the osmolar concentration. There is a lack of awareness from primary health-care professionals about the difficulties that can arise when giving medications to patients receiving enteral feeding which may affect patient care and the nutritional outcomes.     

Patterns of care: an analysis of the quality of nutritional care routinely provided to elderly hospitalized veterans

To assess the adequacy of the nutritional care provided, a prospective noninterventional study was carried out on 250 randomly selected patients aged 65 and over who were admitted to a Veterans Administration Hospital. Of this group, 97 patients (39%) were found to be at high risk of having clinically significant protein-energy malnutrition. In 43 cases (17%), an assessment of the patient's nutritional status was not possible because the available data were inadequate. No patient had a diagnosis of malnutrition recorded on the problem list. Only 13 percent of the high-risk patients received some form of nutrition support therapy; 10 (10%) received oral supplements, and four (4%) were started on enteral feedings. Patients who received enteral feedings experienced a high rate of complications resulting from use of the feeding tubes. Over all, none of the high risk study patients received optimal nutrition support therapy. These findings indicate that elderly patients hospitalized in the Veterans Administration hospital in this study are usually not screened appropriately for protein-energy malnutrition, the diagnosis is frequently missed or ignored, and nutrition support therapy is underutilized and often ineffectually managed.     

Early initiation of enteral feeding after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement.

Enteral feeding through the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube is usually initiated about 12 to 24 hours after insertion of the tube. There have been earlier studies evaluating the efficacy of early initiation of enteral feedings that had encouraging results. However, delayed initiation of feeding following PEG placement continues to be practiced widely. We believe that feeding can be done earlier without any increase in associated morbidity or mortality and with obvious reduction in the need for parenteral nutrition and healthcare costs. We evaluated a protocol to initiate enteral nutrition 4 hours after the PEG tube insertion with subsequent discharge of the outpatients on the same day. We conducted a prospective study to assess the efficacy of early initiation of PEG feeding. We enrolled 77 patients in our study who were having PEG tubes placed for enteral feeding. Only patients who had a PEG placed for gastric venting procedures were excluded from our study. During the course of our study, no patient had to be excluded for the latter reason. Patients were evaluated by the physician performing the procedure, 4 hours after the tube was inserted. Their vital signs were checked, and a thorough abdominal examination was performed. Minimal tenderness around the PEG site was the most frequent finding. Otherwise, all the patients had a benign abdominal examination. The tube was flushed with 60 mL of sterile water. Following the examination, orders were given to restart the feedings. These patients were followed for a 30-day period to evaluate complications associated with PEG tube placement and early initiation of PEG feeding. There was one case of aspiration pneumonia (1.3%) and one death that was attributed to the underlying disease out of our 77 patients. Early initiation of enteral feeding after PEG tube placement can be successfully completed with a systematic protocol and close observation. Not only was this protocol found to be safe, it can also have significant cost savings by eliminating the need for inpatient hospitalization for the procedure.     

鼻肠管在伴有胃出口梗阻的胃癌病人营养和化疗中的应用

目的:探讨经内镜放置鼻肠管给予肠内营养(EN)在伴有胃出口梗阻的胃癌病人新辅助化疗中的应用及疗效。方法:对16例伴有胃出口梗阻的胃癌病人经内镜放置鼻肠管并给予EN,观察该方法的安全性和有效性。结果:16例病人均成功经内镜放置鼻肠管,平均置管时间为(10.8±3.6)min,未发生消化道穿孔和出血等严重并发症。所有病人均顺利完成新辅助化疗,并在化疗结束后接受了手术。结论:经内镜放置鼻肠管行EN,能改善伴有胃出口梗阻胃癌病人的营养状况,帮助其完成新辅助化疗。     

Placement of a Magnetic Small Bowel Feeding Tube at the Bedside

Background: Current methods of achieving postpyloric enteral access for feeding are fraught with difficulties, which can markedly delay enteral feeding and cause complications. Bedside tube placement has a low success rate, often requires several radiographs to confirm position, and delays feeding by many hours. Although postpyloric enteral tubes can reliably be placed in interventional radiology (IR), this involves greater resource utilization, delays, cost, and inconvenience. We assessed the utility of bedside enteral tube placement using a magnetic feeding tube (Syncro‐BlueTube; Syncro Medical Innovations, Macon, GA, USA) as a means to facilitate initial tube placement. Methods: We recorded the time to insertion, location of tube, success rate, and need for radiographs in a series of patients given magnetic feeding tubes (n = 46) inserted by our hospitalist service over an 8‐month interval. Results: Of the 46 attempted magnetic tube placements, 76% were successfully placed in the postpyloric position, 13% were in the stomach, and 11% could not be placed. In 83% of the magnetic tubes, only 1 radiograph was needed for confirmation. The median time to placement was 12 minutes (range, 4–120 minutes). Conclusion: The use of a magnetic feeding tube can increase the success rate of bedside postpyloric placement, decrease the time to successful placement, and decrease the need for supplemental radiographs and IR.     

Comparison of Gravity Flow Rates Between ENFit and Legacy Feeding Tubes

Background: Misconnections between enteral supplies and other access devices have led to significant morbidity and mortality. To reduce misconnections, a standard small‐bore connector has been developed (International Organization for Standards 80369‐8; ENFit). The full impact of transition to this connector is not known, however. Method: Working with major manufacturers and Food and Drug Administration, we obtained ENFit and comparative legacy tubes of variable sizes (low‐profile, 14F, 18F, 20F, and 24F balloon gastrostomies). Gravity enteral feeding was simulated with an empty bolus syringe attached to the feeding tube to be tested. The tube was clamped and filled to the 60‐mL mark with liquid (water, Jevity 1 Cal, Isosource HN, Isosource 1.5 Cal, Two Cal HN, and Nourish). The clamp was released, and time for formula to leave the syringe was recorded. Results: There was no difference in flow rate between the aggregate legacy and ENFit tubes for the low‐profile, 18F, and 20F sizes. The ENFit 14F tubes had a lower flow rate vs the legacy tubes, largely due to the low flow rates seen with the 1 ENFit tube. Similarly, 24F ENFit tubes with some formulas yielded lower flow rates as opposed to legacy. Conclusion: Overall, for the low‐profile, 18F, and 20F sizes, the ENFit tubes had similar flow rates when compared with the legacy tubes. For the 14F and 24F sizes, the flow rate of ENFit tubes was significantly lower, which could result in longer EN delivery for patients who are using these tubes to provide gravity feeding.     

Verification of an electromagnetic placement device compared with abdominal radiograph to predict accuracy of feeding tube placement

Background: Use of an electromagnetic placement device (EMPD) facilitates placement of feeding tubes at the bedside. Standard practice for verification of feeding tube placement is via radiographic confirmation. The purpose of this research study was to assess the accuracy of placement of small‐bore feeding tubes (SBFTs) as determined by EMPD interpretation compared with that of abdominal radiograph verification by a radiologist. Methods: This multicenter prospective study enrolled patients requiring bedside feeding tube placement. SBFTs were placed by an experienced investigator using the EMPD. Two abdominal radiographs were then obtained: one after initial SBFT placement and an additional radiograph after injection of contrast. Documentation of location based on clinician interpretation using the EMPD was then compared with radiologist interpretation. Results: The final sample size was 194 patients, including 18 pediatric patients. Patient age ranged from 12 days to 102 years. Median time for tube placement was 12 minutes. Of the 194 patients, only 1 patient had data showing discrepancies between the original EMPD verification and the final abdominal radiograph interpretation, providing a 99.5% agreement. No patient experienced complications during SBFT placement, and 15 patients had inadvertent airway placement that was avoided with the use of the EMPD. Conclusions: There was a high percentage of agreement between EMPD and radiologic interpretation after contrast injection. The EMPD aided in avoiding inadvertent airway placement, with no patient complications. This device can be used safely at the bedside to facilitate placement of feeding tubes, leading to the delivery of early enteral nutrition.     

脑外科重症病人肠内营养相关并发症分析

目的:观察脑外科重症病人早期肠内营养支持中相关并发症的发生及其相关因素.方法:将78例收住ICU接受肠内营养支持脑外科重症病人(GCS为4～8分),按GCS评分,分为特重症组及一般重症组两组,观察肠内营养喂养量、输注速度、EN天数、血清清蛋白及肠内营养的耐受情况,总结各种肠内营养并发症的发生率.结果:脑外科重症病人在输注速度、最大耐受量、腹泻、腹胀等并发症方面均有明显不同.特重症组肠内营养液输注速度、最大维持量等,均低于一般重症组,EN天数、腹泻、腹胀的发生率高于一般重症组;腹泻发生与ALB、GCS评分水平呈负相关,与输注速度呈正相关.结论:肠内营养相关的胃肠道并发症,与疾病的严重程度、肠内营养输注速度和用量、血清清蛋白水平等因素相关.     

A new nasal bridle for securing nasoenteral feeding tubes

A newly designed nasal bridle and rationale for its clinical use are described. Previous nasal bridles have been shown to reduce the 40 to 60% incidence of dislodgement of nasoenteral feeding tubes. Nasal bridles, however, are still not routinely used in nasoenteral feeding of patients who dislodge their feeding tubes. Instead, percutaneous gastrostomies and parenteral nutrition are increasingly being used in these patients who may otherwise be fed adequately with a secured nasoenteral tube. The newly designed nasal bridle described herein has the advantages of easy and rapid placement. Use of this bridle can promote safer and more effective enteral feeding while avoiding the complications and cost of parenteral nutritional and gastrostomies.     

Enteral access in mechanically ventilated patients.

The early institution of enteral nutrition is now accepted as the preferred route of feeding in critically ill patients with a functioning gastrointestinal tract. It is particularly important to establish early enteral nutrition in mechanically ventilated patients because of the metabolic demands associated with mechanical ventilation. The options for enteral access in mechanically ventilated patients are reviewed, with an emphasis on those techniques that may be performed at the bedside. The advantages, disadvantages, and complications of the different techniques will be considered.     

Pre-pyloric versus post-pyloric feeding

Optimal management of the critically ill patient involves the initiation and rapid advancement of early enteral nutrition (EN). Compared to parenteral nutrition or no nutritional support, early enteral feeding favorably impacts patient outcome by reducing infectious morbidity and shortening hospital length of stay. Controversy exists over the true risks and benefits of pre-pyloric versus post-pyloric feeding. Placement of nasogastric tubes is easier than nasojejunal tubes, initiation of EN is more expedient, and intragastric feeds may provide greater physiologic benefits. Post-pyloric feeding, on the other hand, is associated with fewer interruptions once EN has been started, may reach goal calorie provision sooner, and may reduce risk for gastroesophageal reflux and aspiration. Overall differences in outcome between the two methods of feeding, however, are minimal. Thus, the final choice for the practicing clinician on the level of infusion of enteral feeding is based on institutional factors (related to protocols and available expertise) and the degree of risk and potential tolerance of the individual patient.     

Experience of post-pyloric feeding in seriously ill patients in clinical practice

BACKGROUND: Maintaining nutrition is an integral part of patient care and when it is possible enteral nutrition is regarded as superior to parenteral nutrition. Post-pyloric feeding may enable enteral feeding to be maintained in patients who cannot tolerate nasogastric feeding. The success of post-pyloric feeding in routine clinical practice is uncertain. METHODS: One hundred and forty six consecutive patients who had 150 separate episodes of post-pyloric feeding were identified. Casenotes were reviewed to assess indication for post-pyloric feeding, prior use of alternative methods of feeding, success of achieving nutritional requirements and patient outcome. RESULTS: A post-pyloric tube was successfully placed in 138 (92%) and nutritional requirements were met by post-pyloric feeding alone in 124 (83%). Post-pyloric feeding was used for between 2 and 254 days (median 14 days). Conditions for which post-pyloric feeding was used to administer nutritional support included burn injury, pancreatitis, sepsis, post-operative gastric stasis, bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy induced vomiting. Fifty (33%) patients had an attempt at nasogastric feeding and 33 (22%) were on total parenteral nutrition before post-pyloric feeding was commenced. There was one major complication of a jejunal ulcer bleed in the series. Minor complications included displacement of the nasojejunal tube and failure to absorb feed related to gastrointestinal dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Post-pyloric feeding can be successfully used to maintain enteral nutrition in patients who would otherwise require parenteral nutrition.     

Enteral nutrition practice in a surgical intensive care unit: what proportion of energy expenditure is delivered enterally?

The object of this study was to document enteral feeding practice in critically ill patients in a surgical intensive care unit. We asked what proportion of measured energy expenditure is delivered enterally. Patient, material, and therapy-related factors should be assessed and related to enteral nutrition.Sixty patients receiving enteral nutrition for a period of at least 10 days were included in the study. Mean daily energy expenditure was 27.8+8.7 kcal/kg. Mean daily enteral delivered calories reached 19.7+/-10.3 kcal/kg (P<0.05). Twenty-one out of 60 (35%) patients were fed isocalorically; 46% of enteral nutrition days failed to reach 80% of energy expenditure. Ten out of 30 patients (33%) fed over a gastric tube were nourished isocalorically in comparison to 8 out of 20 patients (40%) fed over a duodenal tube. Factors associated with hypocaloric enteral feeding in multiple logistic regression were abdominal, pelvic and lumbal spine trauma, gastrointestinal intolerance, problems with the feeding tube, additional surgical interventions, airway management and use of fentanyl. In the course of the study, gastrointestinal complications were the cause for more than 50% of insufficient enteral delivery cases, while therapy and material related reasons contribute to only a minor part.Abdominal, pelvic and lumbal spine traumas are associated with a higher possibility towards developing problems with enteral delivery, as shown by odds-ratios greater than eight. These diagnoses amounted in our investigation to nearly 40% and make a great difference to medical patients. Therefore, recommendations for optimising enteral feeding must take the concerned patient collective into account.     

Spontaneous transpyloric passage and performance of 'fine bore' polyurethane feeding tubes: a controlled clinical trial

Certain groups of patients requiring enteral nutritional support are at increased risk of regurgitation and pulmonary aspiration of feed. Positioning of enteral feeding tubes distal to the pylorus has been advocated as a method of reducing such complications. Various techniques have been suggested to achieve postpyloric siting. Reports have indicated that lengthening the tube or altering the distal end tip configuration, by varying the tip profile or by the addition of a weight, may facilitate spontaneous transpyloric passage of the tube. This prospective controlled clinical study using three new polyurethane tubes demonstrates that the frequency of spontaneous transpyloric passage of the tube is not affected by tip profile or by the addition of a weight. Indeed, with all three tube designs only about one-third had passed spontaneously through the pylorus at 24 hr. Once through the pylorus the unweighted tube stayed in position significantly longer than the weighted tubes (p less than 0.005). We suggest that in those patients requiring post-pyloric feeding, endoscopic or fluoroscopic techniques should be used to position the tubes at the time of insertion, and that an unweighted tube should be used to prolong tube usage.     

胃镜辅助下放置空肠营养管的方法

目的:探讨内镜下放置空肠营养管的方法.方法:给148例病人放置空肠营养管,116例病人在胃镜下用异物钳钳夹胃腔内空肠营养管,推送胃镜将其送至Treitz韧带以下.32例经鼻超细胃镜放置导丝后,再经导丝放入空肠营养管.结果:两种空肠营养管放置成功率均为100%,其中鼻肠管126例,三腔鼻肠管22例.两组均无严重并发症,1例病人置管后出现血淀粉酶升高.结论:两种空肠营养管放置的方法成功率均高,不良反应小,操作简单安全.     

Pneumothorax complicating enteral feeding tube placement

Two cases are presented of pneumothorax complicating enteral feeding tube insertion. A previous report describing three similar cases is noted. Neurologically impaired patients appear to be particularly at risk for this complication, which may be encouraged by use of a guidewire during tube insertion. It is suggested that enteral feeding tubes in neurologically impaired patients be inserted under fluoroscopic guidance using a tube specifically designed for this purpose.     

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus nasogastric tube feeding for patients with head and neck cancer: a systematic review

There are two main enteral feeding strategies—namely nasogastric (NG) tube feeding and percutaneous gastrostomy—used to improve the nutritional status of patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). But up till now there has been no consistent evidence about which method of enteral feeding is the optimal method for this patient group. To compare the effectiveness of percutaneous gastrostomy and NGT feeding in patients with HNC, relevant literature was identified through Medline, Embase, Pubmed, Cochrane, Wiley and manual searches. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-experimental studies comparing percutaneous gastrostomy—including percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and percutaneous fluoroscopic gastrostomy (PFG) —with NG for HNC patients. Data extraction recorded characteristics of intervention, type of study and factors that contributed to the methodological quality of the individual studies. Data were then compared with respect to nutritional status, duration of feeding, complications, radiotherapy delays, disease-free survival and overall survival. Methodological quality of RCTs and non-experimental studies were assessed with separate standard grading scales. It became apparent from our studies that both feeding strategies have advantages and disadvantages.     

Effect of Perioperative Immuno-Enhanced Enteral Nutrition on Inflammatory Response,Nutritional Status,and Outcomes in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Major Surgery

Administration of imunno-enhanced nutritional support may decrease postoperative morbidity, mortality, and infectious complications in cancer patients. The aim of this study was to verify that perioperative enteral diet, enriched with the nutrients arginine, ribonucleic acid (RNA), and ω-3 fatty acids improves outcomes of head and neck cancer patients undergoing major surgery. Forty patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were studied. Group 1 received no preoperative nutritional support, whereas Group 2 received an oral formula with nutrients arginine, RNA, and ω-3 fatty acids. After surgery, Group 1 received a standard enteral formula, whereas Group 2 received an enriched enteral formula. Albumin (g/dl), prealbumin, fibrinogen, CRP, Il-6, and TNFa were measured 5 days before and 8 days after surgery. No statistically significant difference was observed for all the evaluated markers between postoperative and preoperative levels for both groups. The rate of complications was significantly reduced in the total number of patients receiving immunonutrition and in the particular subgroup of well-nourished patients receiving an immuno-enhanced diet. Perioperative enteral immuno-enhanced feeding in head and neck cancer patients undergoing major surgery may influence the postoperative outcomes by reducing the frequency rate of infections and wound complications.