Clinical and Doppler echocardiographic follow-up after percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty for aortic valve stenosis

Percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty has been shown to increase the aortic orifice area and to improve clinical symptoms. However, there are only few data concerning long-term results after balloon valvuloplasty. In this study, 36 patients (11 men, 25 women, mean age 75 +/- 8 years) were followed after balloon valvuloplasty for a period of up to 18 months by means of clinical parameters and repeated Doppler echocardiographic measurements after 1, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months. Invasive measurements revealed a decrease of the systolic peak gradient from 78 +/- 24 to 38 +/- 13 mm Hg (p less than 0.001), and an increase in the aortic orifice area from 0.58 +/- 0.23 to 0.93 +/- 0.2 cm2 (p less than 0.001). The Doppler echocardiographic approach revealed that the maximal instantaneous gradient decreased from 96 +/- 26 to 67 +/- 22 mm Hg (p less than 0.001). The aortic orifice area increased from 0.49 +/- 0.16 to 0.73 +/- 0.21 cm2 (p less than 0.001). Three patients (8%) died in the hospital. After hospital discharge, 16 patients (44%) died and 8 patients (22%) underwent successful aortic valve replacement after a mean follow-up of 8 +/- 6 months. Nine patients (25%) were alive after a follow-up period of 18 months. Seven of these (19%) remained clinically improved. During follow-up, the Doppler echocardiographic results revealed a continuous trend toward the preprocedural severity of the aortic valve stenosis. Progression of restenosis assessed by Doppler echocardiographic measurements was accelerated in the group of patients who subsequently died or underwent repeat balloon valvuloplasty or aortic valve replacement.     

Unusual sequelae after percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty: a Doppler echocardiographic study.

Percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty is a promising new technique for the treatment of mitral stenosis, with a relatively low complication rate reported to date. To assess the sequelae of this procedure, Doppler echocardiographic studies were prospectively performed before and after percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty in a series of 172 patients (mean age 53 +/- 17 years). After balloon dilation, mitral valve area increased from 0.9 +/- 0.3 to 2 +/- 0.8 cm2 (p less than 0.0001), mean gradient decreased from 16 +/- 6 to 6 +/- 3 mm Hg (p less than 0.0001) and mean left atrial pressure decreased from 24 +/- 7 to 14 +/- 6 mm Hg (p less than 0.0001). Although most patients were symptomatically improved, six (4%) were identified who had unusual sequelae evident on Doppler echocardiographic examination immediately after percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty. These included rupture of a posterior mitral valve leaflet, producing a flail distal leaflet portion with severe mitral regurgitation detected on Doppler color flow mapping (n = 1); asymptomatic rupture of the chordae tendineae attached to the anterior mitral valve leaflet with systolic anterior motion of the ruptured chordae into the left ventricular outflow tract (n = 1); a double-orifice mitral valve (n = 1); and evidence of a tear in the anterior mitral valve leaflet (n = 3), producing on both pulsed Doppler ultrasound and color flow mapping a second discrete jet of mitral regurgitation in addition to regurgitation through the main mitral valve orifice. All six patients made a satisfactory recovery and none has required mitral valve replacement.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

A case of combined percutaneous transfemoral mitral valvuloplasty and aortic valve implantation

We present the case of an 83-year-old man who was admitted with New York Heart Association class III dyspnea and paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea. Because of high surgical risk, a percutaneous treatment of both mitral and aortic valvulopathies was planned. This case reports the feasibility of a totally percutaneous approach in combined rheumatic mitral and aortic valve disease for patients with prohibitive surgical risk.     

Echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve area in elderly patients with aortic stenosis and of changes in valve area after percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty

Echocardiographic studies, adequate for analysis of aortic valve area using the continuity equation, were obtained in 31 patients aged greater than or equal to 60 years who were undergoing catheterization for assessment of suspected aortic stenosis. Catheterization-determined aortic valve area was 0.74 +/- 0.30 cm2 (mean +/- SD) and Doppler-determined aortic valve areas were 0.68 +/- 0.27 and 0.65 +/- 0.27 cm2, depending on whether peak or mean velocities, respectively, were entered into the continuity equation. There were significant correlations between both of the Doppler-derived and the catheterization-determined aortic valve areas (r = 0.86, p less than 0.001 for both the continuity equation employing peak velocities and the continuity equation employing mean velocities) which were demonstrated to be linear by F test (catheterization area = -0.03 + 1.13 X Doppler area determined using peak velocities, SEE = 0.163 cm2, p less than 0.001; and catheterization area = -0.02 + 1.16 X Doppler area determined using mean velocities, SEE = 0.165 cm2, p less than 0.001). Both sets of correlations had linear regression parameters meeting the conditions for identity. Significant linear correlations were also noted between the non-invasive measurements of aortic valve excursion, ventricular ejection time, time to one-half carotid upstroke, maximal Doppler velocity and maximal Doppler gradient and catheterization aortic valve area, but the correlations were less tight than those between valve areas determined by catheterization and by Doppler continuity equation. Ten of the patients underwent percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty. There were significant linear correlations between aortic valve areas determined by Doppler and catheterization methods both before valvuloplasty (r = 0.77, p = 0.01; p less than 0.001 by F test, SEE = 0.134 cm2) and after valvuloplasty (r = 0.85, p less than 0.01; p = 0.0001 by F test, SEE = 0.161 cm2). Linear regression parameters met the conditions for identity. There was also a significant linear correlation between catheterization and Doppler measurements of absolute change in aortic valve area (r = 0.79, p less than 0.01; p less than 0.001 by F test, SEE = 0.11 cm2). Aortic valve area can be determined reliably by continuity equation in elderly patients. In addition, results of balloon valvuloplasty, measured by changes in catheterization-determined aortic valve area, are accurately reflected by changes in aortic valve area determined using the continuity equation.     

Follow-up of balloon aortic valvuloplasty in young adults--a combined hemodynamic and Doppler echocardiographic study

Percutaneous Balloon Valvuloplasty was performed in 25 patients with severe aortic stenosis (Aortic valve area index: 0.23 to 0.70, mean 0.36 +/- 0.11 cm2/m2). The mean age was 23 +/- 15 (range 6-66) years, and majority (n = 18) had noncalcific valves. Valve morphology was bicuspid in 14, tricuspid in 6 and indeterminate in 5. Valvuloplasty resulted in a fall of peak systolic gradient (PSG) from 112 +/- 35 to 34 +/- 16 mmHg (p less than 0.001), and an increase in aortic valve area (index) (AVAI) from 0.36 +/- 0.11 to 0.82 +/- 0.43 cm2/m2 (p less than 0.001). Follow-up data at 16 +/- 6 months were available for 18 patients, 80 per cent of whom registered symptomatic improvement. Repeat catheterization, performed in 12 cases, showed increase of PSG to 53 +/- 22 mmHg and a fall in AVA (1) to 0.62 +/- 0.24 cm2/m2, as compared to the results immediately following the procedure. In addition, 3 patients had their valve areas estimated by doppler echocardiography. Forty-six per cent of these 15 patients (n = 7) showed evidence of restenosis. Four out of these 7 cases had calcific valves, whereas none of the patients who had sustained improvement had calcification. Tricuspid morphology was present in 50 per cent of the group with sustained improvement, as compared to 20 per cent of the group that restenosed. Our preliminary data shows sustained hemodynamic improvement after balloon dilatation in young patients with severe aortic stenosis with noncalcific and tricuspid aortic valve.     

Aortic balloon valvuloplasty and aortic valve replacement: A comparative follow-up study

The purpose of this study was to compare the short-term and long-term benefits and complications of patients subjected to aortic balloon valvuloplasty with those of a similar group of patients subjected to aortic valve replacement. Both groups were matched for age and sex and followed up to December 1991. The study period for the valvuloplasty group was from 1986 to 1991. The surgical group was studied from 1979 to 1991. Clinical and hemodynamic data were collected prospectively. Short- and long-term follow-ups were collected retrospectively from chart reviews, telephone inquiries with patients, immediate relatives, and family physicians. A total of 66 patients were studied; 33 had balloon valvuloplasty. A similar number of surgical patients were randomly selected from a group of 60 who had aortic valve replacement, to match the age and sex of the valvuloplasty group. Baseline, clinical, and hemodynamic characteristics were similar in both groups. All patients had right, retrograde, and transseptal left heart catheterization. Gradient across aortic valve was measured by simultaneous recording of pressures in left ventricle and aorta. Indicator dilution curves were used to calculate cardiac index and assess severity of aortic regurgitation. Patients with regurgitant fraction >25% were excluded from aortic valvuloplasty. Although inhospital mortality was higher in surgically treated patients (12% vs 9%) the 5-year survival of valve replacement was much better than those treated with balloon valvuloplasty (71% vs 7%). Our selection of patients and immediate results of valvuloplasty are comparable to seven published series. Aortic balloon valvuloplasty should not be used as a routine or elective procedure for treatment of adult patients with aortic stenosis. It could, however, be considered as a bridge procedure to stabilize high-risk patients before surgical replacement of the valve.Presented at the 36th Annual World Congress, International College of Angiology, New York, New York, July 1994     

Doppler echocardiographic assessment of hemodynamic progression of valvular aortic stenosis over time: comparison between aortic valve resistance and valve area.

BACKGROUND: Doppler-derived aortic valve resistance (AVR), i.e. the ratio between pressure gradient and flow rate, has been proposed as an alternative parameter to valve area (AVA) for assessing the hemodynamic severity of aortic stenosis (AS). There are no data on the evaluation of hemodynamic progression of AS using AVR. METHODS: Forty-five adult patients (24 women and 21 men, mean age 72 +/- 10 years) with AS were followed up for 18 months (range 6 to 45 months) with serial Doppler-derived AVR (Isaaz, JACC 1991; 18: 1661) and AVA (continuity equation). Rates of change of AVR and AVA over time were indexed for year of follow-up; furthermore, variations of these parameters during follow-up were expressed as percent change from baseline. RESULTS: During the follow-up period, AVA decreased from 0.74 +/- 0.28 to 0.6 +/- 0.17 cm2 (p < 0.05), with a rate of change of -0.1 +/- 0.13 cm2/year; AVR increased from 349 +/- 187 to 462 +/- 180 dyne/s/cm-5 (p < 0.05), with a rate of change of 79 +/- 69 dyne/s/cm-5/year. Variations observed in AVR, expressed as percent change from baseline, were larger than those observed in AVA (51 +/- 62% versus -16.5 +/- 15%). AVR percent change from baseline significantly correlated with AVA percent change from baseline (r = 0.83, p < 0.05). During follow-up, 6 patients showed no change in AVA: AVR was unchanged in 3 and increased in the remaining 3 patients (6, 11 and 58%, respectively), indicating a progression of AS severity that could not be appreciated from AVA alone. CONCLUSIONS: Serial changes in AVR, as assessed by Doppler echocardiography, significantly correlate with changes in AVA. Thus, the noninvasive assessment of AVR may be utilized in the evaluation of hemodynamic progression of AS and, in conjunction with AVA, may also provide complementary information for the management of these patients.     

Doppler echocardiographic measurement of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis: a noninvasive application of the Gorlin formula

Thirty adult patients with aortic stenosis had Doppler echocardiography within 1 day of cardiac catheterization. Noninvasive measurement of the mean transaortic pressure gradient was calculated by applying the simplified Bernoulli equation to the continuous wave Doppler transaortic velocity recording. Stroke volume was measured noninvasively by multiplying the systolic velocity integral of flow in the left ventricular outflow tract (obtained by pulsed Doppler ultrasonography) by the cross-sectional area of the left ventricular outflow tract (measured by two-dimensional echocardiography). Non-invasive measurement of aortic valve area was calculated by two methods. In method 1, the Gorlin equation was applied using Doppler-derived mean pressure gradient, cardiac output and systolic ejection period. Method 2 used the continuity equation. These noninvasive measurements were compared with invasive measurements using linear regression analysis, and mean pressure gradients correlated well (r = 0.92). Aortic valve area by either noninvasive method also correlated well with cardiac catheterization values (method 1, r = 0.87; method 2, r = 0.88). The sensitivity of Doppler detection of critical aortic stenosis was 0.86, with a specificity of 0.88 and a positive predictive value of 0.86. Cardiac output measured nonsimultaneously showed poor correlation (r = 0.51). Doppler echocardiography can distinguish critical from noncritical aortic stenosis with a high degree of accuracy. Measurement of aortic valve area aids interpretation of Doppler-derived mean pressure gradient data when the gradients are in an intermediate range (30 to 50 mm Hg).     

Simultaneous echocardiographic and catheterisation gradients and mitral valve area during balloon mitral valvuloplasty.

This study was aimed at estimating mean transmitral gradients by simultaneous Doppler echocardiography and cardiac catheterisation and determining mitral valve area by pressure half time, Gorlin's formula and two-dimensional echocardiography so as to assess the relative accuracy of these methods before and after balloon mitral valvuloplasty in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis. Left atrium-left ventricular, pulmonary artery wedge-left ventricular and echo gradients were simultaneously recorded in 18 patients undergoing balloon mitral valvuloplasty. Mitral valve area was estimated by pressure half time, Gorlin's equation and two-dimensional echocardiography. The correlation between left atrium-left ventricular and echo mean gradient before balloon mitral valvuloplasty was 0.96 (p < 0.03). Between pulmonary artery wedge-left ventricular and echo mean gradient, it was 0.95 (p < 0.04). The correlations between left atrium-left ventricular and pulmonary artery wedge-left ventricular mean gradient were also good. After balloon mitral valvuloplasty, similar good correlations were seen. On subgrouping the patients into those with high and low pulmonary artery pressure, good correlation persisted both before and after balloon mitral valvuloplasty. Mitral valve area by all the methods were similar before balloon mitral valvuloplasty. After balloon mitral valvuloplasty, mitral valve area by pressure half time was the least and by two-dimensional echocardiography, the maximum. All the three methods are equally accurate in estimating transmitral gradients and mitral valve area in mitral stenosis before balloon mitral valvuloplasty. Two-dimensional echocardiography is the best to estimate mitral valve area after balloon mitral valvuloplasty. Echocardiography can replace haemodynamic measurement of gradients and mitral valve area before and after balloon mitral valvuloplasty. But pressure half time is not recommended for measuring mitral valve area immediately after balloon mitral valvuloplasty where two-dimensional echocardiography mitral valve area is to be employed.     

Recurrence of symptoms after percutaneous aortic balloon valvuloplasty: relationship to Doppler diastolic filling values.

Short-term follow-up after percutaneous aortic balloon valvuloplasty shows a high incidence of restenosis. Yet a high percentage of patients with restenosis continue to show symptomatic improvement. Those with decreased left ventricular function originally tend to have a recurrence of symptoms. In this study Doppler-derived diastolic filling values at follow-up were most highly associated with symptom status, suggesting that change in diastolic filling after percutaneous aortic balloon valvuloplasty is one of the factors related to symptoms.     

Doppler haemodynamic profiles of clinically and echocardiographically normal mitral and aortic valve prostheses.

Doppler echocardiographic studies were performed in 380 consecutive patients with 415 normally functioning artificial valves to establish normal Doppler characteristics for each type of prostheses used in our institution, with particular reference to Starr-Edwards valves, and to serve as control studies for future assessment. None of the patients were in heart failure at the time of the study. Peak transaortic velocities (m.s-1) were higher and effective orifice areas (cm2) smaller in mechanical valves as a whole, when compared with bioprostheses (P less than 0.01); 2.7 +/- 0.7 and 1.4 +/- 0.55 for Starr-Edwards, 2.7 +/- 0.6 and 1.5 +/- 0.6 for Bjork-Shiley, 1.8 +/- 0.1 and 1.5 +/- 0.6 for Duromedics and 1.5 +/- 0.06 and 2 +/- 0.12 for bioprostheses, respectively. In the mitral position, the average peak diastolic velocities (m. s-1) and pressure half-times (ms) were higher in mechanical valves, but there was a large overlap between the various types and sizes of prostheses (P = NS); 1.6 +/- 0.3 and 98 +/- 25 for Starr-Edwards, 1.4 +/- 0.3 and 88 +/- 26 for Bjork-Shiley, 1.8 +/- 0.1 and 75 +/- 5 for Duromedics and 1.5 +/- 0.3 and 90 +/- 20 for bioprostheses, respectively. There was an inverse relation between valve size and pressure halftime for Starr-Edwards prostheses (P less than 0.01). Doppler flow characteristics in mechanical valves where similar in patients with normal and dysfunctioning prostheses. Valvular or myocardial dysfunction could best be ascertained when early postoperative studies were available for comparison.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comparison of Doppler echocardiographic methods with heart catheterisation in assessing aortic valve area in 100 patients with aortic stenosis.

OBJECTIVE--To examine the practicability and accuracy of Doppler echocardiographic methods in determining aortic valve area. METHODS--Aortic valve areas determined by three methods using Doppler echocardiography (applying the continuity equation and the modified Gorlin formula using data from Doppler echocardiography and right heart catheterisation) were compared with values obtained by heart catheterisation. PATIENTS--100 consecutive patients with aortic stenosis aged between 34 and 83 years (mean (SD) 66 (10)). RESULTS--Differences in individual patients' measurements of aortic valve area by the three Doppler techniques varied by up to 0.56 cm2 compared with values obtained by heart catheterisation. On average, values obtained from Doppler echocardiographic methods lay up to 51% below and 78% above those obtained by heart catheterisation. CONCLUSIONS--All three Doppler echocardiographic methods were practicable in routine clinical practice for patients of all ages, but they were of limited accuracy when compared with the aortic valve areas found invasively using the invasive Gorlin equation. However, these deviations may not always be due to inadequacies of the Doppler methods: they could also be caused by limitations in the Gorlin formula. Doppler methods can be repeated if required, they allow examination of the morphology of the valve, and they subject the patient to considerably fewer risks than the invasive procedure. An adequate strategy in determining the severity of aortic valve stenosis would be to calculate the valve area by Doppler echocardiography as well as considering the valvar aortic pressure gradient. The valve area alone should not be relied on exclusively, as has been the increasing practice in the past few years.     

Doppler echocardiographic assessment of transmitral gradients and mitral valve area before and after mitral valve balloon dilatation

This is a comparative study of 60 sets of observations of mitral valve end-diastolic gradient, mean diastolic gradient, and mitral valve area obtained by Doppler echocardiography and cardiac catheterization. The studies were performed in 28 patients, 16 of whom underwent mitral valve balloon valvuloplasty. These 16 patients had studies performed before, immediately after valvuloplasty, and one week later. Thus 28 studies were performed before or without valvuloplasty (Group I) and 32 after valvuloplasty (Group II). The time interval between Doppler echocardiography and cardiac catheterization was less than 24 hours in 44 studies and 24 to 72 hours in 16 studies. In Doppler echocardiography the gradients were obtained by simplified Bernoulli's equation and the mitral valve area by pressure half-time method. There was excellent correlation between end-diastolic gradients (r = 0.96, p less than 0.001) and mean diastolic gradients (r = 0.92, p less than 0.001) measured by the two techniques. A statistically significant correlation also existed in the mitral valve area values (r = 0.53, p less than 0.005). On separate analysis Group I showed excellent correlation for all three variables (r values of 0.90, 0.87, and 0.82 for end-diastolic gradients, mean-diastolic gradients, and mitral valve area, respectively). Group II also showed excellent correlation of end-diastolic gradients (r = 0.80) and mean diastolic gradients (r = 0.87), but poor correlation of the mitral valve areas (r = 0.17; p = NS) by the two techniques. Doppler echocardiography can accurately measure transmitral gradients both before and after valvuloplasty.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Stentless vs. stented aortic valve bioprostheses: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

AIMS: We sought to assess the haemodynamic profile of the Freedom stentless aortic valve compared with a stented bioprosthesis in a randomized controlled trial using echocardiography. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty patients (mean age 73 years) undergoing bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (AVR) were randomized to either Sorin Freedom stentless (n=31) or Sorin More stented (n=29) valves. The primary endpoints were left ventricular mass index (LVMI) reduction at 6 and 12-months. We also assessed post-operative effective orifice area index (EOAI), aortic gradient and operative time. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics. The stentless valve was associated with a lower post-operative gradient [PG 17 (12) vs. 31 (13) mmHg, P<0.0001] and greater EOAI [1.1 (0.3) vs. 0.8 (0.2) cm2/m2, P<0.0001]. A highly significant reduction in LVMI occurred by 6 months in both groups, but LVMI was significantly lower in the stentless group [LVMI 119 (39) vs. 135 (30) g/m2, P=0.05]. However, there was continued regression of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in the stented but not in the stentless group, resulting in no significant difference in LVMI at 12 months [119 (36) vs. 126 (31) g/m2, P=0.42]. CONCLUSION: The use of the Sorin Freedom stentless bioprosthesis for AVR results in lower PG and greater EOA when compared with a Sorin More stented valve. This is associated with earlier regression of LVH.     

Doppler echocardiographic determination of aortic and pulmonary valve orifice areas in normal adult subjects.

Cross-sectional and Doppler echocardiography were performed in 36 healthy adult subjects (aged 19 to 50 yr, mean 28 +/- 9; male 23, female 13) to establish normal values for aortic and pulmonary valve orifice areas. Standard continuity equation using echo-determined ventricular outflow tract diameters and Doppler-determined flow-velocity integrals from the outflow tracts and the corresponding great arteries, was employed to calculate the valve areas. Mean left ventricular outflow tract diameter was 1.92 +/- 0.17 cm (range 1.5-2.3 cm) and right ventricular outflow tract diameter was 1.80 +/- 0.18 cm (range 1.5-2.2 cm). Calculated aortic valve orifice area was 2.63 +/- 0.31 cm2 (1.76 +/- 0.2 cm2/m2) and correlated poorly with body surface area (r = 0.31, p > 0.05). Mean pulmonary valve orifice area was 3.01 +/- 0.36 cm2 (2.02 +/- 0.20 cm2/m2) and had a modest correlation with body surface area (r = 0.38, p < 0.05). No difference was observed between males and females for indexed aortic and pulmonary valve orifice areas. These data provide normal values for echocardiographically determined semilunar valve orifice areas and question the practice of indexing valve area for body surface in adult subjects.