High variability of retrograde fast pathway sensitivity to adenosine

BACKGROUND: Adenosine is widely used as a tool to assess the effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation of concealed accessory pathways. HYPOTHESIS: The goal of this study was to determine the reliability of this test by studying the retrograde fast pathway sensibility in a large patient population with typical atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentry tachycardias. We sought also to determine whether AV nodal properties were predictive of a retrograde fast pathway sensitivity to adenosine. METHODS: In all, 124 patients with inducible AV nodal reentrant tachycardia were included in this study. All patients received a clinically used standard dose of 12 mg adenosine during ventricular pacing, with 500 ms and a constant ventriculoatrial (VA) conduction via the fast pathway. Electrophysiologic parameters of the AV node were determined in all patients in order to correlate them with the adenosine sensitivity of the retrograde pathway. RESULTS: In 74 patients, the injection of 12 mg adenosine resulted in a transient VA block, whereas no VA block occurred in the remaining 50 patients. In two patients, concealed accessory pathways were unmasked after the injection of adenosine. The adenosine sensitivity of the retrograde fast pathway was associated with longer retrograde conduction times and cycle lengths during AV nodal reentrant tachycardias. CONCLUSION: This study shows a high variability of retrograde fast pathway sensitivity to adenosine. Thus, in 40% of patients the lack of VA block after adenosine injection is not specific for persistent accessory pathway function after radiofrequency ablation. Electrophysiologic properties of patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardias were different in patients with and without adenosine-sensitive retrograde fast pathways, possibly indicating differential patterns of penetration of the retrograde fast pathway into the compact AV node.     

Conduction properties of the antegrade fast and slow AV nodal pathways associated with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia.

To elucidate differences in conduction properties among the normal atrioventricular (AV) node and the antegrade fast and slow dual AV nodal pathways (DAVNPW), AV nodal conduction curves were analyzed quantitatively in 38 patients. Eighteen patients had antegrade DAVNPW with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) (dual pathways group) and the remaining 20 had smooth AV nodal conduction curves, without evidence of AV nodal dysfunction (control group). The effective refractory period (ERP) of the antegrade fast pathway was longer than that of the normal AV node (at both basic cycle lengths of 700 and 500 msec, p less than 0.01). Although the atrial premature beats were delayed by a longer ERP in the fast pathway, there was no significant difference in the degree of prolongation of AV nodal conduction time related to shortening of the coupling interval (i.e., ratio of A2H2 increment to A1A2 decrement) between these two pathways. On the other hand, the ERP of the antegrade slow pathway was similar to that of the normal AV node. The degree of prolongation of AV nodal conduction time (relative to the shortening of the coupling interval) was greater in the antegrade slow pathway than in the normal AV node. In conclusion, these findings suggest that in DAVNPW with AVNRT: (1) the antegrade fast pathway is similar to the AV node and its conduction properties are unlikely to be better than those of the normal AV node and (2) the antegrade slow pathway has quantitatively poorer conduction properties than the normal AV node, since it has a greater degree of decremental conduction.     

Selective blockade of retrograde fast pathway by intravenous disopyramide in paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia mediated by dual atrioventricular nodal pathways

Electrophysiological effects of 2 to 2.5 mg/kg iv disopyramide were studied in 10 patients with dual nodal pathways who used a slow pathway for anterograde and a fast pathway for retrograde conduction during paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (mean cycle length 308.5 +/- 37 ms; range 260-370 ms). Disopyramide terminated the tachycardia in six cases by production of ventriculoatrial block in five and by sinus overdrive in one. In the remaining four patients cycle length of the paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia increased significantly from 270 +/- 8 ms to 377.5 +/- 28 ms. In all 10 patients disopyramide depressed retrograde fast pathway conduction manifest by an increase in mean ventricular paced cycle length producing ventriculoatrial block from less than or equal to 296.5 +/- 25 ms to 358 +/- 60 ms, and increase in retrograde fast pathway effective refractory period from less than or equal to 246 +/- 34 ms to 325 +/- 36 ms; the drug abolished ventriculoatrial conduction in two cases. Anterograde slow pathway and fast pathway conduction properties were unchanged after disopyramide (atrial paced cycle length producing AH block 292 +/- 30 to 306.5 +/- 30 ms; effective refractory period of anterograde fast pathway less than or equal to 274 +/- 56 to 284 +/- 44 ms, before and after the drug, respectively) suggesting that anterograde conduction was not crucial either for sustainment or for failure to initiate paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia after the drug. Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia could not be reinduced in six cases after disopyramide. In the other four the ventricular paced cycle lengths producing ventriculoatrial block (318 +/- 41 ms) and effective refractory period of retrograde fast pathway (320 +/- 28 ms) were shorter than the cycle length of reinduced paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (367.5 +/- 35 ms) allowing perpetuation of the tachycardia. We conclude that disopyramide breaks atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia by specific blockade of the retrograde fast pathway though the effect on anterograde atrioventricular nodal conduction is variable.     

Selective blockade of retrograde fast pathway by intravenous disopyramide in paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia mediated by dual atrioventricular nodal pathways.

Electrophysiological effects of 2 to 2.5 mg/kg iv disopyramide were studied in 10 patients with dual nodal pathways who used a slow pathway for anterograde and a fast pathway for retrograde conduction during paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (mean cycle length 308.5 +/- 37 ms; range 260-370 ms). Disopyramide terminated the tachycardia in six cases by production of ventriculoatrial block in five and by sinus overdrive in one. In the remaining four patients cycle length of the paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia increased significantly from 270 +/- 8 ms to 377.5 +/- 28 ms. In all 10 patients disopyramide depressed retrograde fast pathway conduction manifest by an increase in mean ventricular paced cycle length producing ventriculoatrial block from less than or equal to 296.5 +/- 25 ms to 358 +/- 60 ms, and increase in retrograde fast pathway effective refractory period from less than or equal to 246 +/- 34 ms to 325 +/- 36 ms; the drug abolished ventriculoatrial conduction in two cases. Anterograde slow pathway and fast pathway conduction properties were unchanged after disopyramide (atrial paced cycle length producing AH block 292 +/- 30 to 306.5 +/- 30 ms; effective refractory period of anterograde fast pathway less than or equal to 274 +/- 56 to 284 +/- 44 ms, before and after the drug, respectively) suggesting that anterograde conduction was not crucial either for sustainment or for failure to initiate paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia after the drug. Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia could not be reinduced in six cases after disopyramide. In the other four the ventricular paced cycle lengths producing ventriculoatrial block (318 +/- 41 ms) and effective refractory period of retrograde fast pathway (320 +/- 28 ms) were shorter than the cycle length of reinduced paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (367.5 +/- 35 ms) allowing perpetuation of the tachycardia. We conclude that disopyramide breaks atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia by specific blockade of the retrograde fast pathway though the effect on anterograde atrioventricular nodal conduction is variable.     

从慢慢型和慢快型房室结折返性心动过速电生理特性的差异分析折返环的不同

目的从慢慢型房室结折返性心动过速（AVNRT）和慢快型AVNRT的电生理特性的差异分析两型AVNRT间折返环的不同.方法在500例AVNRT患者中的59例慢慢型和60例慢快型之间,比较部分电生理特性的异同;同时在部分慢慢型和慢快型患者中应用2种方法（1）比较起搏时和心动过速时的HA间期的长度;（2）比较心动过速时心室刺激重整心动过速的不同.比较下传共径（LCP）的异同.结果慢慢型的前传慢径和逆传慢径有明显不同的传导时间;慢慢型的逆传慢径与慢快型的逆传快径有明显不同的传导时间和递减特性;和慢快型相比,2种方法均显示慢慢型有较长的LCP.结论 （1）慢慢型AVNRT中前传慢径和逆传慢径的传导时间明显不同;慢慢型较慢快型有较长的下传共径;（2）研究结果支持慢慢型AVNRT可能应用房室结的右侧后延伸和左侧后延伸分别形成心动过速的前传和逆传支而形成折返.     

Effects of atropine on induction and maintenance of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

The electrophysiologic effects of atropine were studied in 14 patients with dual atrioventricular (AV) nodal pathways and recurrent paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT). During PSVT, all patients used a slow pathway (SP) for antegrade and fast pathway (FP) for retrograde conduction. Atropine enhanced both SP antegrade and FP retrograde conduction, shown by a decrease in paced cycle lengths (atrial and ventricular) producing AV and ventriculoatrial block. Five patients had induction of sustained PSVT before and after atropine. Seven patients failed to induce or sustain PSVT before atropine, because of retrograde FP refractoriness. All seven had induction of sustained PSVT after atropine due to facilitation of FP retrograde conduction. Two patients had only single atrial echoes before atropine, reflecting SP antegrade refractoriness. After atropine, sustained PSVT was inducible in one, and nonsustained in the other, PSVT cycle length could be compared in seven patients before and after atropine and decreased from 383 +/- 25 to 336 +/- 17 (p less than 0.05). Thus, in patients with dual AV nodal pathways, atropine facilitated SP antegrade and FP retrograde conduction, shortened cycle length of PSVT and potentiated ability to sustain PSVT.     

Selective transcatheter ablation of the fast and slow pathways using radiofrequency energy in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

BACKGROUND. The safety and efficacy of selective fast versus slow pathway ablation using radiofrequency energy and a transcatheter technique in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) were evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS. Forty-nine consecutive patients with symptomatic AVNRT were included. There were 37 women and 12 men (mean age, 43 +/- 20 years). The first 16 patients underwent a fast pathway ablation with radiofrequency current applied in the anterior/superior aspect of the tricuspid annulus. The remaining 33 patients initially had their slow pathway targeted at the posterior/inferior aspect of the right interatrial septum. The fast pathway was successfully ablated in the initial 16 patients and in three additional patients after an unsuccessful slow pathway ablation. A mean of 10 +/- 8 radiofrequency pulses were delivered; the last (successful) pulse was at a power of 24 +/- 7 W for a duration of 22 +/- 15 seconds. Four of these 19 patients developed complete atrioventricular (AV) block. In the remaining 15 patients, the post-ablation atrio-His intervals prolonged from 89 +/- 30 to 138 +/- 43 msec (p less than 0.001), whereas the shortest 1:1 AV conduction and effective refractory period of the AV node remained unchanged. Ten patients lost their ventriculoatrial (VA) conduction, and the other five had a significant prolongation of the shortest cycle length of 1:1 VA conduction (280 +/- 35 versus 468 +/- 30 msec, p less than 0.0001). Slow pathway ablation was attempted initially in 33 patients and in another two who developed uncommon AVNRT after successful fast pathway ablation. Of these 35 patients, 32 had no AVNRT inducible after 6 +/- 4 radiofrequency pulses with the last (successful) pulse given at a power of 36 +/- 12 W for a duration of 35 +/- 15 seconds. After successful slow pathway ablation, the shortest cycle length of 1:1 AV conduction prolonged from 295 +/- 44 to 332 +/- 66 msec (p less than 0.0005), the AV nodal effective refractory period increased from 232 +/- 36 to 281 +/- 61 msec (p less than 0.0001), and the atrio-His interval as well as the shortest cycle length of 1:1 VA conduction remained unchanged. No patients developed AV block. Among the last 33 patients who underwent a slow pathway ablation as the initial attempt and a fast pathway ablation only when the former failed, 32 (97%) had successful AVNRT abolition with intact AV conduction. During a mean follow-up of 6.5 +/- 3.0 months, none of the 49 patients had recurrent tachycardia. Forty patients had repeat electrophysiological studies 4-8 weeks after their successful ablation, and AVNRT could not be induced in 39 patients. CONCLUSIONS. These data suggest that both fast and slow pathways can be selectively ablated for control of AVNRT. Slow pathway ablation, however, by obviating the risk of AV block, appears to be safer and should be considered as the first approach.     

Electrophysiological mechanisms of conversion of typical to atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia occurring after radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow pathway

This report presents an adult patient with conversion of typical to atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) after slow pathway ablation. Application of radiofrequency energy (3 times) in the posteroseptal region changed the pattern of the atrioventricular (AV) node conduction curve from discontinuous to continuous, but did not change the continuous retrograde conduction curve. After ablation of the slow pathway, atrial extrastimulation induced atypical AVNRT. During tachycardia, the earliest atrial activation site changed from the His bundle region to the coronary sinus ostium. One additional radiofrequency current applied 5 mm upward from the initial ablation site made atypical AVNRT noninducible. These findings suggest that the mechanism of atypical AVNRT after slow pathway ablation is antegrade fast pathway conduction along with retrograde conduction through another slow pathway connected with the ablated antegrade slow pathway at a distal site. The loss of concealed conduction over the antegrade slow pathway may play an important role in the initiation of atypical AVNRT after slow pathway ablation.     

Simultaneous antegrade dual AV node conduction initiates AV nodal re-entrant tachycardia (a rare initiation mechanism)

Typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia among adults. The concept of dual pathway physiology remains widely accepted, although this physiology likely results from the functional properties of anisotropic tissue within the triangle of Koch, rather than anatomically distinct tracts of conduction. AVNRT is typically induced with anterograde block over the fast pathway and conduction over the slow pathway, with subsequent retrograde conduction over the fast pathway. On rare occasions, anterograde AV node conduction occurs simultaneously through fast and slow pathways resulting in two ventricular beats in response to one atrial beat. We report a case of AVNRT where the tachycardia is always induced by the same mechanism described above. Successful ablation was achieved by slow pathway modification.     

Differential Effect of Adenosine on Anterograde and Retrograde Fast Pathway Conduction in Patients with Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Adenosine and Retrograde Fast Pathway Conduction . Introduction : Several studies have shown that the fast pathway is more responsive to adenosine than the slow pathway in patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. Little information is available regarding the effect of adenosine on anterograde and retrograde fast pathway conduction.
Methods and Results : The effects of adenosine on anterograde and retrograde fast pathway conduction were evaluated in 116 patients (mean age 47 ± 16 years) with typical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. Each patient received 12 mg of adenosine during ventricular pacing at a cycle length 20 msec longer than the fast pathway VA block cycle length and during sinus rhythm or atrial pacing at 20 msec longer than the fast pathway AV block cycle length. Anterograde block occurred in 98% of patients compared with retrograde fast pathway block in 62% of patients ( P < 0.001). Unresponsiveness of the retrograde fast pathway to adenosine was associated with a shorter AV block cycle length (374 ± 78 vs 333 ± 74 msec, P < 0.01), a shorter VA block cycle length (383 ± 121 vs 307 ± 49 msec, P < 0.001), and a shorter VA interval during tachycardia (53 ± 23 vs 41 ± 17 msec, P < 0.01).
Conclusion : Although anterograde fast pathway conduction is almost always blocked by 12 mg of adenosine, retrograde fast pathway conduction is not blocked by adenosine in 38% of patients with typical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. This indicates that the anterograde and retrograde fast pathways may be anatomically and/or functionally distinct. Unresponsiveness of VA conduction to adenosine is not a reliable indicator of an accessory pathway.     

Comparative effects of adenosine triphosphate on accessory pathway and atrioventricular nodal conduction

Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) has potent negative dromotropic effects on the atrioventricular (AV) node, but variable effects on accessory pathway conduction have been described. The effects of an intravenous bolus injection of 8 mg ATP on accessory pathway and AV nodal conduction were determined during electrophysiologic testing with controlled atrial and ventricular rates. AV conduction was monitored during atrial or ventricular pacing at a constant cycle length, 30 msec longer than the cycle length at which block occurred. During atrial pacing antegrade block after administration of ATP occurred in 1 of 30 (3.2%) patients with accessory pathway conduction and 12 of 13 (92%) patients with AV nodal conduction (p less than 0.001). During ventricular pacing only 5 of 26 (16%) patients had accessory pathways blocked, whereas 25 of 35 (71%) patients with AV nodal conduction had block (p less than 0.001). Thus, failure of ATP to produce ventriculoatrial block identified the presence of an accessory pathway with a sensitivity of 84%, specificity of 71%, and predictive value of 72%. There was no correlation between accessory pathway properties and the effects of ATP. The effects of ATP on the AV node were concordant with the effects of a combination of verapamil and propranolol in 21 of 23 patients, suggesting that this dose ATP is an equipotent AV nodal blocker with a short duration of action. Thus, although the effects of ATP on accessory pathways and the AV node differ, block in ventriculoatrial conduction after administration of ATP cannot be used as the sole criterion to distinguish the mechanism of conduction.     

Electrophysiologic Spectrum of Atrioventricular Nodal Behavior in Patients with Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Undergoing Selective Fast or Slow Pathway Ablation

AV Nodal Behavior After Ablation. Introduction; The objective of this report is to delineate the atrioventricular (AV) nodal electrophysiologic behavior in patients undergoing fast or slow pathway ablation for control of their AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT).
Methods and Results: One hundred sixteen consecutive patients with symptomatic AVNRT were included. Twenty-two patients underwent fast pathway ablation with complete abolition of AVNRT in all and development of complete AV block in five patients. Of 17 patients with intact AV conduction postablation, 12 had demonstrated antegrade dual pathway physiology during baseline study, which was maintained in three and lost in nine patients postablation. Two patients with successful fast pathway ablation developed uncommon AVNRT necessitating a slow pathway ablation. Twenty-one patients demonstrated both common and uncommon forms of AV nodal reentry during baseline study. The earliest site of atrial activation was close to the His-bundle recording site (anterior interatrial septum) during common variety and the coronary sinus ostium (posterior interatrial septum) during the uncommon AV nodal reentry in all 21 patients. Ninety-six patients underwent successful slow pathway ablation. Among these, the antegrade dual pathway physiology demonstrable during baseline study (60 patients) was maintained in 25 and lost in 35 patients postablation.
Conclusion: These data suggest that: (1) dual pathway physiology may persist after successful ablation, which might be a reflection of multiple reentrant pathways in patients with AVNRT: and (2) the retrograde pathways during common and uncommon AVNRT have anatomically separate atrial breakthroughs. These findings have important electrophysiologic implications regarding the prevailing concept of the AV nodal physiology in patients with AVNRT.     

Selective radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway for the treatment of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Evidence for involvement of perinodal myocardium within the reentrant circuit.

BACKGROUND. The circuit of atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia may include perinodal atrial myocardium. Furthermore, in patients with dual AV nodal pathways, the atrial insertion of the slow pathway is likely to be located near the ostium of the coronary sinus, caudal to the expected location of the AV node. The present study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of selective catheter ablation of the slow pathway using radiofrequency energy applied along the tricuspid annulus near the coronary sinus ostium as definitive therapy for AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. METHODS AND RESULTS. Among 34 consecutive patients who were prospectively enrolled in the study, the slow pathway was selectively ablated in 30, and the fast pathway was ablated in four. Antegrade conduction over the fast pathway remained intact in all 30 patients after successful selective slow pathway ablation. There was no statistically significant change in the atrio-His interval (68.5 +/- 21.8 msec before and 69.6 +/- 23.9 msec after ablation) or AV Wenckebach rate (167 +/- 27 beats per minute before and 178 +/- 50 beats per minute after ablation) after selective ablation of the slow pathway. However, the antegrade effective refractory period of the fast pathway decreased from 348 +/- 94 msec before ablation to 309 +/- 79 msec after selective slow pathway ablation (p = 0.005). Retrograde conduction remained intact in 26 of 30 patients after selective ablation of the slow pathway. The retrograde refractory period of the ventriculo-atrial conduction system was 285 +/- 55 msec before and 280 +/- 52 msec after slow pathway ablation in patients with intact retrograde conduction (p = NS). There were three complications in two patients, including an episode of pulmonary edema and the development of spontaneous AV Wenckebach block during sleep in one patient after slow pathway ablation and the late development of complete AV block in another patient after fast pathway ablation. Over a mean follow-up period of 322 +/- 73 days, AV nodal reentrant tachycardia recurred in three patients, all of whom were successfully treated in a second ablation session. CONCLUSIONS. Radiofrequency ablation of the slow AV pathway is highly effective and is associated with a low rate of complications.     

Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in children: effect of slow pathway ablation on fast pathway function

INTRODUCTION: Prior studies in adults have shown significant shortening of the fast pathway effective refractory period after successful slow pathway ablation. As differences between adults and children exist in other characteristics of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), we sought to characterize the effect of slow pathway ablation or modification in a multicenter study of pediatric patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from procedures in pediatric patients were gathered retrospectively from five institutions. Entry criteria were age <21 years, typical AVNRT inducible with/without isoproterenol infusion, and attempted slow pathway ablation or modification. Dual AV nodal pathways were defined as those with > or =50 msec jump in A2-H2 with a 10-msec decrease in A1-A2. Successful ablation was defined as elimination of AVNRT inducibility. A total of 159 patients (age 4.4 to 21 years, mean 13.1) were studied and had attempted slow pathway ablation. AVNRT was inducible in the baseline state in 74 (47%) of 159 patients and with isoproterenol in the remainder. Dual AV nodal pathways were noted in 98 (62%) of 159 patients in the baseline state. Ablation was successful in 154 (97%) of 159 patients. In patients with dual AV nodal pathways and successful slow pathway ablation, the mean fast pathway effective refractory period was 343+/-68 msec before ablation and 263+/-64 msec after ablation. Mean decrease in the fast pathway effective refractory period was 81+/-82 msec (P < 0.0001) and was not explained by changes in autonomic tone, as measured by changes in sinus cycle length during the ablation procedure. Electrophysiologic measurements were correlated with age. Fast pathway effective refractory period was related to age both before (P = 0.0044) and after ablation (P < 0.0001). AV block cycle length was related to age both before (P = 0.0005) and after ablation (P < 0.0001). However, in dual AV nodal pathway patients, the magnitude of change in the fast pathway effective refractory period after ablation was not related to age. CONCLUSION: Lack of clear dual AV node physiology is common in pediatric patients with inducible AVNRT (38%). Fast pathway effective refractory period shortens substantially in response to slow pathway ablation. The magnitude of change is large compared with adult reports and is not completely explained by changes in autonomic tone. Prospective studies in children using autonomic blockade are needed.     

腺苷终止房室结和房室旁道折返性心动过速的心内电生理评价

探讨腺苷对阵发性室上性心动过速 (PSVT)的终止效果 ,观察PSVT终止后出现的心律失常。 2 5例患者 ,其中房室结折返性心动过速 (AVNRT) 11例、房室折返性心动过速 (AVRT) 14例 ,于心内电生理检查时 ,由前臂静脉注射(简称静注 )腺苷 6～ 12mg ,观察其终止心动过速的疗效和作用部位。结果 :11例AVNRT患者静注腺苷后 ,10例恢复窦性心律 ,其中 9例终止AVNRT于慢径前传 ,1例于快径逆传 ;14例AVRT患者静注腺苷后 ,14例均恢复窦性心律 ,终止AVRT 12例于房室结前传 ,2例于旁道逆传。心动过速终止后最常出现的心律失常是房性早搏和一过性Ⅰ和Ⅱ度房室阻滞 ;此外 ,室性早搏也很常见 ,部分患者可出现短阵室性心动过速 ,1例患者出现预激综合征伴心房颤动。结论 :腺苷终止PSVT有较高的成功率 ,但有潜在的促心律失常作用。     

Atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia with QRS voltage and cycle length alternation and aberrant conduction due to two distinct antegrade slow pathways.

QRS voltage and cycle length alternation can be seen during supraventricular re-entrant tachycardias, especially in atrioventricular (AV) re-entrant tachycardia. We present a case of a 20-year-old man, in which AV nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) shows alternation of QRS voltage and cycle length, as well as right bundle branch block aberration due to a re-entrant circuit using two distinct, beat-to-beat alternating slow AV nodal pathways antegradely and a single fast pathway retrogradely. Although more than one antegrade slow pathway exists, creation of a single lesion at the right posterior atrial septum using the conventional right-sided approach successfully eliminated AVNRT.     

Differential Effect of Esmolol on the Fast and Slow AV Nodal Pathways in Patients with AV Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Esmolol Effect on AV Nodal Pathways. Introduction: AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) usually involves anterograde conduction over a slowly conducting (“slow”) pathway and retrograde conduction over a rapidly conducting (“fast”) pathway. A variety of drugs, such as beta blockers, digitalis, and calcium channel blockers, have been reported to prolong AV nodal refractoriness in both the anterograde and retrograde limbs of the circuit. However, few data are available that address whether the fast and slow pathways respond in a quantitatively different manner to drugs such as beta-adrenergic antagonists. In addition, it is not known whether the effects of these agents on refractoriness parallel the effects on conduction in the fast and slow pathways. The present study was performed to measure the effect of the intravenous beta-adrenergic agent, esmolol, on refractoriness and conduction in both the fast and slow AV nodal pathways in patients with AVNRT. Methods and Results: Thirteen patients with discontinuous AV nodal conduction properties and typical AVNRT were studied. Anterograde and retrograde AV nodal functional assessment was performed at baseline and following steady-state drug infusion of intravenous esmolol at a dose of 500 μg/kg for 1 minute, 150 /μg/kg per minute for the next 4 minutes, followed by a continuous maintenance infusion of 50 to 100 μg/kg per minute. The anterograde effective refractory period of the fast pathway increased from 381 ± 75 msec at baseline to 453 ± 92 msec during the infusion of esmolol (P = 0.003). The anterograde effective refractory period of the slow pathway was also prolonged by esmolol, from 289 ± 26 msec to 310 ± 17 msec (P = 0.005). However, the absolute magnitude of the change in the anterograde effective refractory period of the fast pathway (+72 ± 59 msec) was significantly greater than the change in anterograde effective refractory period of the slow pathway (+21 ± 16 msec, P = 0.01). The mean retrograde effective refractory period of the fast pathway increased from 276 ± 46 msec to 376 ± 61 msec during esmolol infusion (P = 0.03). Retrograde slow pathway conduction that could not be demonstrated at baseline became manifest in three patients during esmolol infusion. In contrast to the effects of esmolol on refractoriness, the AH interval during anterograde slow pathway conduction prolonged to a far greater extent (+84 msec) than the HA interval associated with retrograde fast pathway conduction (+5 msec, P = 0.04). Conclusion: The beta-adrenergic antagonist, esmolol, has a quantitatively greater effect on anterograde refractoriness of the fast than the slow AV nodal pathway. However, the effects on conduction intervals during AVNRT are greater in the anterograde slow pathway than in the retrograde fast pathway. These observations suggest that the fast and slow pathways may have differential sensitivities to autonomic influences. This difference in the response to beta-adrenergic antagonists may be exploited as a clinically useful method for demonstrating slow pathway conduction in some individuals with AVNRT.     

Use of adenosine as a diagnostic tool for dual atrioventricular nodal pathways: response of control patients to incremental doses of adenosine

BACKGROUND: Adenosine at low doses preferentially blocks fast over slow pathway conduction in patients with dual atrioventricular (AV) nodal physiology and typical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). During atrial pacing, this effect is manifested as an abrupt increase in the AH interval with low doses of adenosine. This demonstration of dual AV nodal physiology may be useful as a diagnostic tool during electrophysiologic studies in patients with supraventricular tachycardia who are not easily inducible, as clear demonstration of dual AV nodal pathways may indicate that AVNRT is a likely diagnosis and that further attempts at arrhythmia induction should be tailored in that direction. However, to be a useful test, adenosine should not cause an abrupt increase in AH interval in patients without dual AV nodal physiology. HYPOTHESIS: This study was designed to investigate the prevalence of dual AV nodal pathways with administration of adenosine in patients with no history suggestive of AVNRT. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients who had no prior history of AVNRT and were undergoing electrophysiologic study for standard indications were enrolled. Baseline Wenckebach cycle length (WCL) and AV nodal effective refractory periods were measured at atrial pacing cycle lengths of 400 and 600 ms. The atrium was then paced at WCL + 50 ms, and WCL + 100 ms, while incrementally larger doses of intravenous adenosine were administered until AV nodal block occurred. RESULTS: The mean (+/- standard deviation) doses of adenosine required to cause AV nodal block while pacing at WCL + 50 ms and WCL + 100 ms were 7.1 +/- 3.9 and 7.4 +/- 4.5 mg, respectively. In 1 of 37 patients (2.7%, 95% confidence interval 0-8%), an abrupt prolongation of the AH interval was seen with the administration of adenosine during atrial pacing as well as during the atrial refractory period determination. In all other patients, no dual AV nodal physiology was demonstrated during the refractory period determination, and there were only gradual changes in the AH interval with atrial pacing during administration of adenosine. CONCLUSION: Among patients with no history suggestive of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, only 2.7% have clinically silent dual AV nodal pathways using this method. Incremental adenosine infusion during electrophysiologic study can be used as a highly specific diagnostic tool for patients with dual AV nodal pathways.     

Unique electrophysiologic characteristics of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia with different ventriculoatrial block patterns: Effects of slow pathway ablation and insights into the location of the reentrant circuit

BACKGROUND: The electrophysiologic mechanisms of different ventriculoatrial (VA) block patterns during atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) are poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to characterize AVNRTs with different VA block patterns and to assess the effects of slow pathway ablation. METHODS: Electrophysiologic data from six AVNRT patients with different VA block patterns were reviewed. RESULTS: All AVNRTs were induced after a sudden AH "jump-up" with the earliest retrograde atrial activation at the right superoparaseptum. Different VA block patterns comprised Wenckebach His-atrial (HA) block (n = 4), 2:1 HA block (n = 1), and variable HA conduction times during fixed AVNRT cycle length (CL) (n = 1). Wenckebach HA block during AVNRT was preceded by gradual HA interval prolongation with fixed His-His (HH) interval and unchanged atrial activation sequence. AVNRT with 2:1 HA block was induced after slow pathway ablation for slow-slow AVNRT with 1:1 HA conduction, and earliest atrial activation shifted from right inferoparaseptum to superoparaseptum without change in AVNRT CL. The presence of a lower common pathway was suggested by a longer HA interval during ventricular pacing at AVNRT CL than during AVNRT (n = 5) or Wenckebach HA block during ventricular pacing at AVNRT CL (n = 1). In four patients, HA interval during ventricular pacing at AVNRT CL was unusually long (188 +/- 30 ms). Ablations at the right inferoparaseptum rendered AVNRT noninducible in 5 (83%) of 6 patients. CONCLUSION: Most AVNRTs with different VA block patterns were amenable to classic slow pathway ablation. The reentrant circuit could be contained within a functionally protected region around the AV node and posterior nodal extensions, and different VA block patterns resulted from variable conduction at tissues extrinsic to the reentrant circuit.     

Triple antegrade nodal pathway in a patient with supraventricular paroxysmal tachycardia

A 69-year-old patient is described in whom programmed atrial extrastimulus testing revealed dual discontinuity of atrioventricular nodal conduction suggesting a triple antegrade nodal pathway. In this patient, programmed right ventricular pacing initiated two types of tachycardia due to intranodal reciprocating rhythms. In both cases, antegrade conduction occurred via the slow nodal pathway, and retrograde conduction by the fast and intermediate pathways, respectively. During ventricular extrastimulus testing, a single echo beat was elicited via a third circuit: the intermediate nodal pathway in a retrograde direction, and the fast pathway in an antegrade direction.