Successful steroid withdrawal half a year after kidney transplantation

We report two kidney transplant recipients with successful steroid withdrawal. They are living related donor transplant recipients. The first patient, a 37-year-old female, received the kidney from her HLA identical father. The second patient, a 44-year-old man, received the kidney from his HLA 1 haploidentical brother. Both patients were maintained on triple immunosuppressive drug therapy pior to withdrawal of steroid and subsequently were maintained on cyclosporine and azathioprine or mizoribine. Acute rejection occurred within the first 1 month and was treated with steroid bolus therapy successfully in both cases. The time of steroid withdrawal after transplantation was 6.5 months in the first patient and 5 months in the second patient. After steroid withdrawal their graft function remained stable and the graft specimens obtained by biopsy 8 months after withdrawal showed no signs of rejection; no side effects of steroid appeared. These results suggest that steroid withdrawal half a year after transplantation can be accomplished without jeopardizing graft function in selected living related donor transplant recipients.     

肝移植术后激素七天撤离方案的临床疗效评价

目的 评价肝移植术后激素7 d撤离方案的临床有效性及安全性.方法 将2005年10月至2007年10月收治的76例供受者血型相同的首次肝移植患者动态随机法分为两组:术后7 d激素撤离组(7 d组,40例)和术后3个月激素撤离组(3个月组,36例),两组均采用以他克莫司(FK506)为基础的免疫抑制方案.7 d组激素用法:术中静脉滴注1000 mg甲泼尼龙,术后按500、240、200、160、80、40和20 mg依次递减,7 d后停用;3个月组激素用法:按7 d组方案静脉滴注甲泼尼龙7 d后,改用甲泼尼龙口服,每隔3 d依次按48、40、32、24、16、8和4 mg递减18 d,然后4 mg口服至术后3个月.随访6个月并评价术后急性排斥反应发生率和不良反应发生率.结果 共有69例完成全部随访,7例患者因死亡和严重细菌感染等原因于相应时间终止实验.两组患者在术后急性排斥反应、高脂血症、高血压发生率方面的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);7 d组术后糖尿病的发生率(17.5%比38.9%,X2=4.335,P=0.047)明显低于3个月组.结论 供受者血型相同的肝移植采用以FK506为基础的免疫抑制方案时,术后7 d激素撤离是安全有效的,不增加急性排斥反应发生率,并可以明显降低术后糖尿病发生率.     

Late steroid withdrawal for renal transplant recipients on tacrolimus and MMF is safe

INTRODUCTION: We conducted a study to assess the safety of staged, late steroid withdrawal in kidney or kidney/pancreas transplant recipients on steroids, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 50 patients including 33 recipients of cadaveric kidneys, eight living donor kidneys, and nine kidney-pancreas transplants. The mean time posttransplantation was 5.1 years (range 2.1 to 7.9 years). All patients were induced on prednisolone, tacrolimus, and MMF; steroids were withdrawn over 5 to 6 months. The rate of steroid reduction was altered in the face of typical steroid withdrawal symptoms (limb-girdle arthralgia/myalgia). RESULTS: No rejection episodes occurred during steroid withdrawal. No patient required transplant biopsy for graft dysfunction. Six patients failed steroid withdrawal: five due to arthralgia/myalgia and one due to recurrent pulmonary sarcoidosis. The unexplained rise in serum creatinine following steroid withdrawal described in several other steroid withdrawal studies was not observed in this patient cohort. The mean serum creatinine was 137 micromol/L with deltacreatinine -6.8 micromol/y per year prior to steroid cessation versus 132 micromol/L with deltacreatinine -5.9 micromol/y in the year post-steroid cessation. There were 14 patients with posttransplant diabetes mellitus in this cohort: eight on gliclazide and six on insulin. We observed a reduction in their daily insulin/gliclazide requirements from 52 units to 41 units, and 73 mg to 65 mg, respectively. Two patients became gliclazide-independent at the time of steroid cessation. CONCLUSIONS: Careful steroid withdrawal from a platform of tacrolimus and MMF is safe and not associated with a significant risk of rejection or graft dysfunction.     

Complete replacement of methylprednisolone by azathioprine in cyclosporine-treated primary cadaveric renal transplant recipients

In cyclosporine (CsA)-treated renal transplant recipients complete corticosteroid withdrawal followed by CsA monotherapy has been associated with severe rejection episodes in a significant proportion of patients. We report the results of replacement of steroids by azathioprine (AZA) in 25 primary cadaveric renal transplant recipients initially treated with CsA and methylprednisolone (MP). MP taper was started 8.8 +/- 5.6 months posttransplant when the MP dose was either 10 mg/day or 20 mg every other day. MP was tapered off over a 5-month period. At the initiation of MP taper, AZA was added at 1 mg/kg/day and increased to 1.5 mg/kg/day after two months. The CsA dose was adjusted to maintain trough serum levels as measured by radioimmunoassay (RIA) of 50-75 ng/ml, during and after MP withdrawal. Seventeen patients have remained continuously off MP for 14.6 +/- 5.0 months with stable renal function. Reinstitution of MP at 10 mg/day was required in 8 patients, 6 for rejection (1.8 +/- 0.7 months after MP withdrawal), 1 for AZA-induced leukopenia, and 1 for de novo glomerulopathy. Renal function returned to baseline in all 6 patients with rejection after reinstitution of MP. Two of these patients have again been successfully retapered off MP. In the patients withdrawn from MP, body weight and mean arterial blood pressure had decreased by 2.1 +/- 1.3 kg (P less than .05) and 11 +/- 7 mmHg (P less than .05), respectively, at the time of the most recent follow-up compared with values at the initiation of steroid withdrawal. The number of blood pressure medications per patient decreased by 38% (P less than .05) and 6 patients were able to discontinue all antihypertensive drugs after cessation of steroids. Discontinuation of MP also resulted in a decrease in serum cholesterol concentration from 248 +/- 50 to 217 +/- 55 mg/dl (P less than .05). We conclude that steroids can be replaced by AZA in the majority of CsA-treated primary cadaveric renal transplant recipients by the end of the first posttransplant year without an adverse effect on graft survival. This protocol resulted in significant reductions in serum cholesterol, mean arterial blood pressure, and body weight, and may avoid the long-term side effects of steroid therapy.     

Primary immunosuppression regimen of rapid steroid withdrawal after living related liver transplantation: a single-center experience

AIM: Corticosteroids have been considered the mainstay of immunosuppressive therapy after liver transplantation. However, the side effects of long-term steroid use such as diabetes, infections, and bone disease, including growth retardation in children, are serious problems. Our immunosuppression regimen includes FK506 and steroid withdrawal by 30 days after transplantation. The aim of this study was to determine the outcomes of liver transplant, using this immunosuppressive regimen. PATIENTS: Fifteen primary liver transplant recipients were performed between January 1994 and May 2003 and data were reviewed retrospectively. Eight pediatric and four adult recipients, who had survived more than 3 months after transplantation, were included in this sample. The immunosuppressive regimen consisted of FK 506 (Prograf), initially at doses of 0.03 mg/kg, with dose adjustments to achieve daily trough levels of approximately 10 to 12 ng/mL, and predonisone, initially at 4 mg/kg/d, with a taper and cessation by 30 days when the graft was stable. RESULTS: All recipients were successfully withdrawn by 30 days. Acute rejection episodes occurred in three patients, no patient was diagnosed with chronic rejection. The acute rejection-free rate at 5 year was 74.1%. No recipient had diabetes, serious infections or bone disease. CONCLUSION: Our primary immunosuppressive regimen of rapid steroid withdrawal is safe with regard to acute and chronic rejection with benefits upon steroid-related side effects.     

Early steroid withdrawal after liver transplantation: The canadian tacrolimus versus microemulsion cyclosporin a trial: 1-year follow-up

Corticosteroid therapy contributes significant toxicity to liver transplantation. The safety and efficacy of early steroid withdrawal were determined in patients treated with either tacrolimus or microemulsion cyclosporin A (micro-CsA). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who were steroid-free 1 year posttransplantation. From the seven Canadian adult liver transplant centers, 143 patients were randomly allocated oral treatment with either tacrolimus (n = 71) or micro-CsA (n = 72), together with corticosteroids and azathioprine. Eligibility criteria for steroid withdrawal included freedom from acute rejection for a minimum of 3 months, and prednisone ≤0.15 mg/kg/d. In eligible patients, the daily steroid dose was reduced by 2.5 mg each month until complete discontinuation was achieved. At 1 year after transplantation, 75% of the tacrolimus patients and 63% of the micro-CsA patients were steroid-free (P = .20). Of all of the patients who became eligible for steroid withdrawal, steroid discontinuation was achieved in over 80%. One-year patient survival was 97% with tacrolimus and 89% with micro-CsA (P = .052) . Graft survival was 97% and 86%, respectively (P = .017). The overall incidence of acute rejection during the first year was 35% with tacrolimus and 43% with micro-CsA (P = .26). There was no difference in survival, acute rejection, or rate of steroid withdrawal when adjusting for hepatitis C. All acute rejection episodes experienced during steroid withdrawal were steroid-responsive. Steroid-resistant rejection occurred in 5.6% of the tacrolimus and 9.7% of the micro-CsA patients. One patient, in the micro-CsA group, experienced refractory rejection. Chronic rejection was not observed in either group. The toxicity profiles were similar. Postoperative serum creatinine levels were similar, and dialysis was required in less than 10% of patients in each group. Infectious complications were similar in both groups. Neurotoxicity was a serious adverse event in 13% and 10% of patients receiving tacrolimus and micro-CsA, respectively. Early steroid withdrawal is safe and effective after liver transplantation using either tacrolimus plus azathioprine or micro-CsA plus azathioprine immunoprophylaxis. (Liver Transpl 2003;9:587-595.)     

Steroid withdrawal in pancreas transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies of steroid withdrawal have been carried out in kidney and liver transplant recipients, but only a few in pancreas transplant recipients. Yet, pancreas transplant recipients could have significant long-term benefits from steroid withdrawal. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis to determine the feasibility of steroid withdrawal in pancreas transplant recipients. RESULTS: Of 360 recipients who underwent a pancreas transplant between January 1, 1994 and June 30, 1998, 14 attempted steroid withdrawal (12 simultaneous pancreas-kidney [SPK]; 2 pancreas transplant alone [PTA]). Reasons for steroid withdrawal were bone fractures (n = 3), psychiatric disorders (n = 2), severe acne (n = 1), recurrent infections (n = 4), and problems with hypercholesterolemia or hypertension (n = 4). All 14 were maintained on tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) immunosuppression, except for 1 who was on tacrolimus and azathioprine (AZA). Of the 14 recipients, 11 had no episodes of acute rejection before steroid withdrawal. The remaining 3 had one or more acute rejection episodes. Of the 14 recipients, 10 (72%) currently remain off steroids (mean follow-up 18 months, range 5-51 months). However, 4 recipients have resumed steroids: 2 after an acute rejection episode (at 2 and 21 months post-withdrawal) and 2 because of leukopenia (WBC < 3000) and an inability to tolerate full-dose MMF. Steroid withdrawal was unsuccessful in both PTA recipients and in 2 of the 12 SPK recipients. All 14 recipients currently have a functioning pancreas graft. However, 1 of the SPK recipients, in whom steroid withdrawal failed, has developed chronic kidney rejection and is now back on hemodialysis awaiting a retransplant. CONCLUSION: Steroid withdrawal is possible in up to 70% of pancreas transplant recipients. Further studies are necessary to define ideal candidates for steroid withdrawal. Based on the results of this analysis, we have launched a prospective, randomized trial of steroid withdrawal in pancreas transplant recipients.     

A prospective, pilot study of early corticosteroid cessation in high-immunologic-risk patients: the Cincinnati experience

BACKGROUND: The first prospective trial of steroid withdrawal dedicated to high-immunologic-risk patients is reported herein. METHODS: Twenty-five patients were enrolled prospectively in an IRB-approved HIPAA-compliant protocol. Immunosuppression included corticosteroid withdrawal (CSWD) at 7 days, tacrolimus (target trough level 4 to 8 ng/mL), sirolimus (target trough level 8 to 12 ng/mL), and Mycophenolate Mofetil (2 g/d). Induction with daclizumab (2 mg/kg) on posttransplant days (PTD) 0 and 14 was administered to the first 10 patients. The protocol for the next 15 patients was modified because of high acute rejection rates to include received T-cell-depleting antibody induction therapy with thymoglobulin (1.5 mg/kg) on PTDs 0 and 2 followed by daclizumab on Postoperative day (POD) 14. Recipient inclusion criteria included: (1) repeat transplant recipients; or (2) patients with a peak PRA > or =25%. All rejection episodes were diagnosed by biopsy and graded using Banff '97 criteria. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were enrolled and median follow-up was 402 days. Forty percent of recipients were black, 68% of patients were repeat transplant recipients, 68% received deceased donor kidneys, and 36% had a peak flow PRA >25%. Overall acute rejection, graft survival, and patient survival rates of 40%, 88%, and 96%, respectively, were observed for the duration of the study. Acute rejection occurred in 6 of 10 patients (60%) with daclizumab induction; however, acute rejection rates fell to 27% when thymoglobulin was introduced (P = .1). CONCLUSIONS: This study supports our previous observations in a multivariate analysis of early CSWD patients, wherein polyclonal antibody induction therapy reduced acute rejection. High-immunologic-risk patients may be able to undergo early CSWD with acceptable rates of acute rejection.     

Interleukin-2 receptor antibody (basiliximab) for immunosuppressive induction therapy after liver transplantation: a protocol with early elimination of steroids and reduction of tacrolimus dosage.

A prospective evaluation was performed to study the potential benefits of the use of interleukin-2 receptor antibody (IL-2Rab) in the induction therapy with early elimination of steroid and reduction of tacrolimus dosage in liver transplant recipients among whom 94% had chronic hepatitis B infection. Thirty-one liver transplant recipients who underwent right-lobe live donor (n = 19) or cadaveric (n = 12) liver transplantation received IL-2Rab, basiliximab 20 mg intravenously within 6 hours of graft reperfusion and on postoperative day 4 (IL-2ab group). Two doses of steroid injection were given intraoperatively and on postoperative day 1. Postoperative immunosuppression was maintained with oral tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil without the use of steroids. The operative outcomes were compared with those of 49 patients who received standard immunosuppressive regimen consisting of tacrolimus and corticosteroid (steroid group). The overall postoperative morbidity and hospital stay were comparable between the 2 groups. There were significantly lower incidences of postoperative new-onset diabetes (0% vs 28%, P =.011), acute cellular rejection (6% vs 27%, P =.038), and cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigenemia (0% vs 18%, P =.011) in the IL-2Rab group compared with the steroid group. The blood cholesterol level at 6 months after transplantation was significantly lower in the IL-2Rab group (median, 4.0 vs 4.4 mmol/L, P =.007). On follow-up, none of the patients in the IL-2Rab group had hepatitis B viral breakthrough or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence, whereas 1 and 3 patients in the steroid group developed these complications, respectively. In conclusion, treatment of liver transplant recipients with IL-2Rab with early withdrawal of steroids and reduction of tacrolimus dosage is associated with lower incidences of postoperative new-onset diabetes, acute cellular rejection, and CMV antigenemia, as well as a lower serum cholesterol level. Further studies and long-term follow-up are required to document their potential benefits on hepatitis B and HCC recurrences.     

Preferential allocation of marginal kidney allografts to elderly recipients combined with modified immunosuppression gives good results

BACKGROUND: There is an increasing tendency to allocate kidneys from marginal donors in older recipients. This combination optimizes the uses of an expanded donor pool but demands attention for the higher nephrotoxic sensitivity of the kidney and the increased immunosuppression vulnerability of the elderly recipients. We aimed to reduce these hazards by means of a calcineurin-free induction therapy followed by a maintenance regimen targeted to minimize/withdraw steroid. METHODS: Eighty-eight single (43%) or double (57%) transplant recipients (58.4+/-5.7 years) from 88 marginal donors (67+/-8.3 years) received monoclonal anti-IL-2 receptor antibodies, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and steroid. When serum creatinine was less than 2.6 mg/dL, tacrolimus was started and MMF was withdrawn when the tacrolimus trough level was above 15 ng/ml. Steroid was tapered to 5 mg at day 45 and then progressively reduced. RESULTS: Overall patient and graft survival at the first and fourth year were respectively 100 and 96%, and 98 and 79%. Acute rejection rate was 13.6% (12/88), creatinine clearance remained stable (48.2 ml/min at the sixth month, 50.9 ml/min at 48th month). At the first, second, third, and fourth years, 23, 69, 80, and 100% of recipients were off steroids. For those on steroids, mean dose was respectively 2.6 mg/day from month 12. No recipient re-assumed steroids CONCLUSIONS: In the "old-for-old" allocation, the calcineurin-inhibitor avoidance at induction and the steroid withdrawal/minimization during the tacrolimus-based maintenance regimen allow a low acute rejection rate, a stable renal function, and favorable recipient and graft outcomes.     

Effects of steroid withdrawal on posttransplant diabetes mellitus in cyclosporine-treated renal transplant recipients

Posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) traditionally has been attributed to therapy with steroids--however, several lines of evidence suggest that cyclosporine also is diabetogenic. A retrospective review revealed that PTDM developed in 9 of 70 previously nondiabetic kidney transplant recipients (12.9%) maintained on prednisone, azathioprine, and CsA compared with 8 of 83 nondiabetics (9.6%) maintained on azathioprine and prednisone alone in an earlier era (P = NS). Among patients maintained on triple-drug therapy, complete withdrawal of prednisone was attempted in 7 renal transplant recipients with PTDM and in 1 recipient of a combined kidney-pancreas transplant who exhibited evidence of type II diabetes mellitus. Seven of the 8 patients were able to discontinue insulin or oral hypoglycemic agents within 4 months of discontinuing steroids. Mean glycohemoglobin level declined from 10.6 +/- 3.6% prior to steroid withdrawal to 6.0 +/- 1.3% within 1 month of steroid cessation, while mean CsA dose and trough CsA blood levels remained unchanged. In 2 patients, mild rejection episodes prompted a return to steroid therapy. Although CsA may be diabetogenic, evidence from this study suggests that withdrawal of steroid therapy is a safe and effective approach to the management of PTDM in patients subsequently maintained on CsA and azathioprine.     

Early steroid withdrawal in solitary pancreas transplantation results in equivalent graft and patient survival compared with maintenance steroid therapy

Although steroid withdrawal in simultaneous kidney pancreas transplantation has been shown to be feasible, the results of early steroid withdrawal in immunologically solitary pancreas transplantation are not well known. This study evaluated an early steroid withdrawal protocol in this group. The results of steroid withdrawal at 21 d post-transplant in solitary pancreas transplant recipients was compared with a control group consisting of solitary pancreas transplant recipients maintained on steroids (MG). Additional immunosuppression consisted of rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin induction followed by tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in both groups. The withdrawal group (WG, n = 22) consisted of 11 pancreas transplant alone (PTA), six pancreas after kidney (PAK), and five simultaneous cadaveric pancreas living kidney (SPLK) recipients. The steroid maintenance group (MG, n = 32) consisted of 8 PTA, 11 PAK, and 13 SPLK recipients. Recipient and donor demographic characteristics were similar. Seventy eight percent of MG patients had infection-related complications in the first year compared with 50% of the WG patients (p = 0.04). The one-yr rejection, pancreas graft, and patient survival rates were 27.3% 95.5%, and 100% in the WG, and 37.5%, 81.3%, and 93.8% in the MG respectively and not significantly different. We conclude that early corticosteroid withdrawal in isolated pancreas transplantation results in fewer infections and can be achieved without an increased risk of rejection or graft loss over the first year.     

Randomized trial of tacrolimus versus cyclosporine in steroid withdrawal in living donor renal transplant recipients

The introduction of new immunosuppressants has prompted trials of steroid withdrawal. However, several groups have reported a higher incidence of rejection. We conducted a randomized two-arm, parallel-group, open-label, prospective study to compare steroid withdrawal (at 6 months posttransplant) from the regimens of tacrolimus + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (FK group) versus cyclosporine + MMF (CSA group). The entry criteria were recipients of first living donor transplants with no diabetes mellitus (DM), congestive heart failure, chronic liver disease, or acute rejection within 6 months posttransplant. The primary endpoint was a biopsy-proven acute rejection episode or treatment failure within 1 year posttransplant. While 87 recipients were assigned to FK (n = 43) and CSA groups (n = 44) before transplantation, 76 recipients (FK 39, CSA 37) could be tapered off steroids at 6 months posttransplant, since 11 were excluded due to acute rejection within 6 months posttransplant (FK two, CSA three) or protocol violations (FK two, CSA four). After steroid withdrawal, the incidence of acute rejection episodes was 0% in the FK group and 13.5% in the CSA group (P < .05). Other results at 12 months posttransplantation were comparable: the incidences of DM 7.8% versus 0% (FK group vs CSA group), hypercholesterolemia 41.0% versus 59.5%, hypertensives 48.7% versus 59.6% as well as the levels of plasma creatinine 1.21 +/- 0.24 versus 1.31 +/- 0.50 mg/dL (P > .05 in every variable). These data suggest that steroid withdrawal is successful in first living donor renal transplant recipients. Tacrolimus may be significantly more effective than cyclosporine to prevent acute rejection after steroid withdrawal.     

Daclizumab induction and maintenance steroid-free immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus to prevent acute rejection of hepatic allografts

Steroid-free immunosuppressive regimens reduce corticosteroid-related side effects in liver transplant recipients although their efficacy is very variable. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a steroid-free regimen in a 6-month, open-label, multicenter, pilot study, which involved 102 liver transplant patients treated with daclizumab (2 mg/kg within 6 h following transplant and 1 mg/kg on day 7), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, 1 g b.i.d) and tacrolimus (trough levels of 5-15 ng/ml in the first month and 5-10 ng/ml thereafter). One intra-operative dose of methylprednisolone was administered. At 6 months, the acute rejection rate was 9.8%, and patient and graft survival rates were 96% and 95%, respectively. Acute rejection rates were similar for hepatitis C-positive patients (8.6%) and hepatitis C-negative patients (10.4%). Infections occurred in 22% of patients; most cases were considered mild or moderate. Post-transplantation hypertension and diabetes mellitus developed in 37% and 14% of patients, respectively, during the study period, but were markedly less frequent (8% and 6%, respectively) at 6 months. Hypercholesterolemia was observed in only 2% of patients. In conclusion, the steroid-free immunosuppressive regimen of daclizumab, MMF, and tacrolimus effectively prevents acute rejection after liver transplantation without decreasing safety.     

Prospective, randomized trial of steroid withdrawal in kidney recipients treated with mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine

Our transplant centre began a prospective, randomized trial of steroid withdrawal in low risk renal transplant recipients on triple immunosuppression consisting of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), microemulsion cyclosporine (CSA), and prednisone. One hundred and twenty patients were randomized either to discontinue or remain on steroids (60 patients per group). Study design consisted of analyses of 1-yr outcomes after study entry. This report includes the 1-yr results plus results at last follow-up (mean follow-up 3.7 yr). There were no significant differences in rates of patient and graft survival at 1 yr or at last follow-up. Additionally, the incidences of acute and chronic rejection as well as graft function were the same at 1 yr and at last follow-up. Significant improvement was noted in total serum cholesterol and bone density at 1 yr and last follow-up. Initial improvement in patient weight at 1 yr was not sustained at last follow-up. No significant impact of steroid withdrawal on serum triglycerides, blood pressure, or post-transplant diabetes mellitus was observed. To date, we have observed no immunologic risk, and some significant benefit in regards to side effects, of steroid withdrawal between 6 and 36 months after transplantation in low risk renal transplant recipients maintained on prednisone, MMF, and microemulsion CSA. CONCLUSION: Steroid withdrawal in low risk kidney transplant recipients is safe and ameliorates many of the unwanted sides effects of steroid use.     

FK778 and FK506 combination therapy to control acute rejection after rat liver allotransplantation

BACKGROUND: In organ transplantation, several immunosuppressants are currently used to control graft rejection. Clinically, no single immunosuppressive agent can completely prevent posttransplantation immunoreaction; thus, combination therapy is usually performed. Novel agents with more powerful immunosuppressive activity and less toxicity need to be developed. METHODS: Lewis rat livers were orthotopically transplanted into Brown-Norway recipients. FK778 was administered orally from day 0 to day 6 to prevent acute rejection and from day 7 to day 13 to rescue ongoing rejection. To assess the combined effects, recipients were treated with intramuscular injection of FK506 and oral administration of FK778 from day 0 to day 6. Blood chemistry and histopathologic findings were measured to determine the patient's general condition and the graft condition. Allospecific antibodies were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. The FK778 trough concentration was examined by using high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: The acute immune response was suppressed by FK778 alone in a dose-dependent manner. The optimal FK778 dosage was determined to be 20 mg/kg per day, because adverse effects (weight loss and intestinal bleeding) occurred at 30 mg/kg per day. FK778 treatment from day 7 to day 13 rescued liver grafts from ongoing rejection. The intramuscular FK506 (0.125 mg/kg per day) injection and the oral FK778 (20 mg/kg per day) gavages suppressed acute liver graft rejection effectively and maintained better graft condition compared with monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS.: FK778 treatment effectively prevented acute rejection and rescued ongoing rejection after liver transplantation. The optimal dosage was determined to be 20 mg/kg per day. Combination therapy with FK506 was more beneficial than FK778 monotherapy.     

Rapid Discontinuation of Steroids in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Pilot Study

Steroids are associated with significant postoperative complications (hypertension, cosmetic changes, bone loss, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and cataracts). Most develop early; in addition, late post-transplant steroid withdrawal in kidney transplant recipients has been associated with increased acute rejection (AR). To obviate these problems, we studied outcome of a protocol of rapid discontinuation of prednisone (RDS) (steroids stopped on POD6). Between November 1, 1999 and October 31, 2000, 51 adult living donor (LD) first transplant recipients (2 HLA-id, 28 non-id relative, 21 LURD) were immunosuppressed with thymoglobulin (1.25 mg/kg intraoperatively and then qdx4); prednisone (P) (500 mg methylprednisolone intraoperatively, 1 mg/kg x 1 day, 0.5 mg/kg x 2 days, 0.25 mg/kg x 2 days, then d/c); MMF, 1 g b.i.d.; and CSA, 4 mg/kg b.i.d. adjusted to achieve levels of 150-200 ng/mL (by HPLC). Exclusion criteria were delayed graft function or primary disease requiring P. Minimum follow-up was 5.5 months (range 5.5 to 17.5 months). Outcome was compared vs. previous cohorts of LD recipients immunosuppressed with P/AZA/CSA (n = 171) or P/MMF/CSA (n = 43) (both without antibody induction). RESULTS: For the RDS group, average CSA level (+/- S.E.) at 3 and 6 months was 190 +/- 12 and 180 +/- 9; avg. MMF dose, 1.7 +/- 0.1 g and 1.7 +/- 0.1 g. There was no significant difference in 6- and 12-month actuarial patient survival, graft survival and rejection-free graft survival between recipients on the RDS protocol vs. historical controls. For RDS recipients, actuarial 6- and 12-month rejection-free graft survival was 87%. Of the 51 RDS recipients, five (10%) have had AR (at 20 days, 1 month, 3 months, 3 months, and 3.5 months post-transplant). After treatment, all five were maintained on 5 mg P; there have been no second AR episodes. Two additional recipients were started on 5 mg P due to low white blood count (WBC) and low/no MMF. Of the 51 grafts, one has failed (death with function). Average serum Cr level (+/- S.E.) at 3 and 6 months for RDS recipients was 1.7 +/- 0.5 (NS vs. historical controls). CONCLUSION: For low-risk LD recipients, a kidney transplant with an RDS protocol does not increase risk of AR or graft loss. Future studies will need to be done to assess AR rates with an RDS protocol in cadaver transplant recipients and in recipients with delayed graft function.     

Tacrolimus for steroiD-resistant liver rejection in children

Abstract Eighteen pediatric liver transplant recipients were converted from cyclosporine-based immunosuppression to tacrolimus for refractory rejection episodes affecting 21 grafts. Before conversion, steroid boluses were applied to all episodes followed by OKT3 monoclonal antibodies in 3 of them. Baseline biopsy showed cellular rejection in 18 patients and ductopenia in 3 cases. Thirteen episodes initiated within the first 2 postoperative weeks, and 8 occurred beyond the 21st day. A previous steroiD-responsive episode of rejection was noted in 4 patients. Tacrolimus was administered by the oral route to obtain trough blood levels in the range 6–15 ng/ml. Reversal of rejection was obtained in 15 patients (71.4%). Complete normalization of liver function tests was achieved in 10 out of 12 patients who were followed for more than 6 months. A refractory evolution affected 6 patients (28.5 %). Significant factors predictive for tacrolimus-resistant rejection were identified as ductopenia on baseline biopsy, previous episodes of acute rejection, late onset rejection (beyond 21st posttransplant (day), and a longer time of evolution of rejection prior to conversion.     

The impact of early corticosteroid withdrawal on graft survival in liver transplant recipients

Background

There has been increased interest in recent years in reducing or eliminating steroids from the immunosuppression regimen of transplant recipients to reduce adverse effects associated with their use. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between early versus late steroid withdrawal after liver transplant to determine the optimal duration of steroid use in this population.

Methods

This large-scale, retrospective analysis of liver transplants occurred at our institution between 2000 and 2009. Patients were excluded if they were <18 years old, received a multiorgan transplant, or remained on steroids for >1 year. The early steroid withdrawal group had steroids eliminated by 3 months posttransplant; late steroid withdrawal patients had steroids withdrawn between 3 and 12 months posttransplant.

Results

A total of 586 liver transplants occurred during the study period; 330 patients were included in the analysis. Graft survival was significantly lower in the early steroid withdrawal group. There was no difference in patient survival or overall acute rejection. However, the late steroid withdrawal group had a significantly higher rate of early acute rejection episodes. There was no difference with regard to new-onset diabetes after transplant, hyperlipidemia, or cardiovascular events between groups.

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that late corticosteroid withdrawal is associated with better long-term graft survival without increasing the rates of diabetes, hyperlipidemia, or cardiovascular events in liver transplant recipients. A prospective study is warranted to confirm these findings.     

Successful Steroid Withdrawal After Long-Term Adminstration in Renal Transplant Patients

Objective

This study evaluated the effect of steroid withdrawal after long-term administration on stably functioning renal transplant recipients.

Methods

Between April 2000 and October 2006, steroid administration was safely withdrawn in 47 patients with stable graft function for >1 year after renal transplantation. The period between renal transplantation and steroid withdrawal varied from 12 to 234 months. We also investigated the current steroid doses of all 274 outpatients who had undergone renal transplantation at our hospital between July 1977 and October 2006.

Results

Twelve patients out of 47 had to resume steroid administration, 10 (21%) owing to acute rejection with/without recurrent glomerulonephritis, 1 owing to treatment of subacute thyroiditis, and the other owing to accompanying cessation of azathioprine for ovarian cancer. Thirty-five patients have maintained stable graft function for 12 to 90 months (median, 49) after steroid withdrawal as confirmed by follow-up. At present, only 1 of the 47 patients had to resume hemodialysis owing to chronic deterioration of renal graft function. The current steroid doses (prednisolone equivalent) of the 274 outpatients at our hospital are as follows: The number of patients for withdrawn, <5 mg, 5 mg, >5 to 10 mg, and >10 mg/d is 38, 20, 155, 57, and 4, respectively. Of 294 patients, 213 (77.7%) are maintaining stable renal graft functions on ≤5 mg prednisolone per day.

Conclusion

Steroids can be safely withdrawn in renal transplant patients with stable graft functions, even after long-term administration.