Practical guidelines for optimal gamma probe detection of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer: results of a multi-institutional study. For the University of Louisville Breast Cancer Study Group

INTRODUCTION: Multiple radioactive lymph nodes are often removed during the course of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for breast cancer when both blue dye and radioactive colloid injection are used. Some of the less radioactive lymph nodes are second echelon nodes, not true SLNs. The purpose of this analysis was to determine whether harvesting these less radioactive nodes, in addition to the "hottest" SLNs, reduces the false-negative rate. METHODS: Patients were enrolled in this multicenter (121 surgeons) prospective, institutional review board-approved study after informed consent was obtained. Patients with clinical stage T1-2, N0, M0 invasive breast cancer were eligible. This analysis includes all patients who underwent axillary SLN biopsy with the use of an injection of both isosulfan blue dye and radioactive colloid. The protocol specified that all blue nodes and all nodes with 10% or more of the ex vivo count of the hottest node should be removed and designated SLNs. All patients underwent completion level I/II axillary dissection. RESULTS: SLNs were identified in 672 of 758 patients (89%). Of the patients with SLNs identified, 403 patients (60%) had more than 1 SLN removed (mean, 1.96 SLN/patient) and 207 patients (31%) had nodal metastases. The use of filtered or unfiltered technetium sulfur colloid had no impact on the number of SLNs identified. Overall, 33% of histologically positive SLNs had no evidence of blue dye staining. Of those patients with multiple SLNs removed, histologically positive SLNs were found in 130 patients. In 15 of these 130 patients (11.5%), the hottest SLN was negative when a less radioactive node was positive for tumor. If only the hottest node had been removed, the false-negative rate would have been 13.0% versus 5.8% when all nodes with 10% or more of the ex vivo count of the hottest node were removed (P =.01). CONCLUSIONS: These data support the policy that all blue nodes and all nodes with 10% or more of the ex vivo count of the hottest SLN should be harvested for optimal nodal staging.     

Sentinel lymph node dissection for breast cancer: how many nodes are enough and which technique is optimal?

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists in sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping in breast cancer regarding the appropriate number of nodes to remove and the best technique for identification of the SLNs. METHODS: A retrospective chart review from January of 1999 to January of 2004 was performed for all patients undergoing a SLN biopsy examination who had at least 1 positive SLN. RESULTS: We identified 167 patients. A mean of 4.4 SLNs were removed per patient. All of the positive SLNs were identified by node 6. Radiotracer used alone identified 19 positive nodes (11.4%) and blue dye used alone identified 14 positive nodes (8.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that 100% of positive SLNs are found by 6 nodes removed, thereby supporting the concept that the SLN dissection may not be complete by removing only 1 or 2 nodes or only the hottest node. The use of blue dye or radiotracer alone can contribute to the overall false-negative rate.     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy using indigo carmine blue dye and the validity of '10% rule' and '4 nodes rule'

This is the study which assessed sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) using indigo carmine blue dye and the validity of the '10% rule' and '4 nodes rule'. Patients (302) were performed SNB using the combined radioisotope (RI)/indigo carmine dye method. Excised SLNs were confirmed whether they were stained and numbered in order of RI count and the percentage of radioactivity as compared to the hottest node was calculated. The relationship between histological diagnosis, dyeing and RI count was assessed. All the patients were detected SLN. Positive nodes were identified in 84 (27.8%) patients and were identified up to the third degree of hottest. All the hottest positive nodes were stained by indigo carmine. From the results, removing the three most radioactive SLNs identified all cases of nodal metastasis without complications. These stopping rules were valid and useful under indigo carmine use too.     

Sentinel lymph node biopsies in melanoma: how many nodes do we really need?

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) biopsy is a widely used method to detect lymphatic spread in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Several methods are used to detect SLNs. Recent reports attempted to identify the adequate number of SLNs to reliably detect malignant spread in regional lymph nodes. METHODS: The radiotracer counts and the pathologic reports of all patients undergoing SLN biopsies were collected prospectively, to determine which of the nodes harboring radiotracer needed to be removed for examination by histopathology between 1998 and 2005. All patients with positive SLN biopsies were investigated in the study. Lymph nodes were ranked according their radiotracer counts and numbered as hottest nodes, second hottest nodes, third hottest nodes, etc. The relationship between radioactivity and the risk of harboring malignancy was determined. RESULTS: Nodal metastases were detected in 55 basins from 53 patients (10.5%). There was a correlation between the radiotracer uptake and risk of harboring malignancy. Excising the 3 hottest nodes and all blue nodes detected 100% of patients with lymphatic malignancy in our series. Most (98%) of positive lymph nodes had radiotracer counts greater than 30% of the hottest node. Only 1 patient (2%) had radioactive count less than 30%, but had visible blue dye. CONCLUSIONS: Removing only the hottest node is inadequate to detect lymphatic spread. On the other hand, removing the 3 hottest nodes and all visible blue nodes is sufficient to detect regional lymphatic spread in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Removing nodes with a radiotracer uptake less than 30% of the hottest nodes may be unnecessary.     

How many lymph nodes are enough during sentinel lymphadenectomy for primary melanoma?

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has been shown to reliably identify nodal metastases and the subsequent need for further surgical and adjuvant therapy in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Although SLN identification rates have improved with the addition of radioactive colloid to the blue dye technique, it remains unclear how many lymph nodes should be removed to accurately determine the histologic status of the nodal basin. The objective of this study was to determine the optimal extent of SLN biopsy in these patients. METHODS: The records of 633 consecutive patients with melanoma (765 nodal basins) whose primary treatment included SLN biopsy with the use of a combination of blue dye and technetium Tc 99 labeled sulfur colloid were reviewed. SLN biopsy consisted of the removal of all of the blue-stained nodes and all nodes with radiotracer uptake activity of at least twice background. RESULTS: SLN biopsy was successful in 765 of 772 basins (99%). A mean of 1.9 SLNs (median, 2 SLNs) per basin were excised. At least 3 SLNs were removed in 176 basins (23%). The overall histologic status of a basin was always established by the first or second SLN harvested (ie, in no patient was the third or subsequent SLN positive when 1 of the first 2 was not). Of the 124 basins containing lymphatic metastases, the SLN that contained the maximal radiotracer uptake (hottest) and/or stained blue was pathologically positive in 118 basins (95%). In only 6 of the 124 positive basins (5%) was the sole evidence of occult nodal metastases identified in an SLN that was neither blue-stained nor the hottest. All but 1 of these SLNs had counts that were at least 66% of the hottest node in the basin. CONCLUSIONS: With a combined modality approach to SLN biopsy, removal of more than 2 SLNs did not provide information that upstaged any patient with primary melanoma. Removal of additional nonblue SLN(s) that contained radioactive counts of at least twice background but lower than two thirds of the SLNs with maximal radiotracer uptake affected patient management in less than 0.2% of all cases. These findings may be helpful in minimizing the extent of surgery and perhaps in reducing the costs and resource use associated with operating room time and pathologic examination.     

Evaluation of sentinel node biopsy by combined fluorescent and dye method and lymph flow for breast cancer

BackgroundConservative breast resection with subsequent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) is an increasingly popular initial approach for the treatment of breast cancer due to decreased invasiveness. SNB is a shorter procedure with fewer side effects than more substantial surgical procedures, but it sometimes fails to identify metastatic disease. Therefore, a highly sensitive and convenient method is needed to identify sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) with a high probability of containing disease in SNB. We compared the combination of radioisotope or dye with a fluorescence compound to analyze lymph flow to identify targets for SNB.Materials and methodsWe examined patients with breast cancer lacking metastases in the axillary lymph node (ALN). Two methods for targeted SNB were developed: (1) Indocyanine Green (ICG) and Patent blue were injected into the skin overlying the tumor and sub-areolar region just before the surgical procedure. (2) ICG and radiocolloid were injected into the skin overlying the tumor and sub-areolar region. The draining fluorescent lymphatic duct was visualized using a Photodynamic Eye (PDE). We removed the SLNs that were identified by the dye and fluorescence imaging methods. Method 1 was applied to 113 patients undergoing SNB, and 29 patients were treated with Method 2. In our study, patients were grouped by lymph flow into two types: Type C demonstrated convergence to one lymph duct. Type S demonstrated separate lymph ducts.ResultsUsing the fluorescence imaging method, 99.3% of SLNs were identified, and 3.8 SLNs per patient were seen. The SLN identification rates for Patent blue dye and radiocolloid were 92.9% and 100%, respectively, while 1.9 and 2.0 SLNs per patient, respectively, were seen with these methods. We classified two types of lymph flow based on the pattern of lymphatic drainage. Type C converged to a single lymph duct, while Type S drained to separate ducts. Type S lymph drainage was seen in 29/142 patients (20.4%), and Type C drainage was found in 113/141 patients (79.6%). Of the patients with Type S drainage, there were 4.1 SLNs per patient, but only 3.4 SLNs per patient were seen in individuals with Type C drainage. Forty cases had metastases found in the ALNs, and five of these cases were dye-negative and fluorescence-positive. Among these cases, the average number of SLNs identified was one.ConclusionThe combination of fluorescence with a visible dye is a highly sensitive method for SLN identification. When SNB is guided by only the dye method, there is a risk of missing appropriate SLNs in patients with Type S lymph drainage or weak dye staining. The use of a fluorescence method together with dye could increase sensitivity of detection in these cases. Furthermore, fluorescent methods are ideal for hospitals that cannot use conventional radioactive measures.     

The effect of changing gamma count threshold on sentinel lymph node accuracy

PURPOSE: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has been increasingly accepted in many centers as an alternative to axillary lymph node dissection in the nodal staging of breast cancer. The goal of SLN biopsy is to accurately stage the axilla while minimizing postoperative morbidity. Theoretically, the continuing search for SLNs disrupts additional lymphatics and impacts on operative time. The gamma count threshold is a predefined threshold percentage of the ex vivo count of the "hottest" SLN, which when applied to each individually excised lymph node determines whether a given lymph node is the SLN or a non-SLN. The higher the threshold percentage, the less the number of lymph nodes will meet the criteria of being an SLN. This study examines the hypothesis that changing the gamma count threshold from 10% to 50% will not significantly affect accuracy or the false-negative rate. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients who underwent SLN biopsy with or without completion axillary lymph node dissection from March 1995 to January 2001 at Walter Reed Army Medical Center. Data were collected on gamma counts for each SLN and histopathology of each SLN. For each SLN ex vivo gamma count, percentage of the ex vivo gamma count of the "hottest" SLN was calculated. RESULTS: The SLN identification success rate was 94% (163 out of 174 patients). On average, 2.07 SLNs were removed per patient and 58% of patients had more than 1 SLN removed (94 out of 163 patients). Only 10% had 4 or more SLNs removed (17 out of 163 patients). Sentinel lymph node metastasis was found in 21% of patients (35 of 163 patients). Of these 35 patients with positive SLNs, 8 patients had a negative "hottest" SLN when a less radioactive SLN was positive for metastasis. Changing the gamma count threshold from 10% to 50% lowers the extrapolated accuracy from 98% to 95% and increases the extrapolated false-negative rate from 8% to 21%. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy and false-negative rate of SLN biopsy varies based on the lower limit gamma threshold. Maintaining our 10% gamma count threshold results in acceptable accuracy and false-negative rates comparable to reported literature.     

Selective Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection for Melanoma: Importance of Harvesting Nodes with Lower Radioactive Counts without the Need for Blue Dye

Background

Determining how many sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) should be removed for melanoma is important. The purpose of this study is to determine the frequency at which nodes that are less radioactive than the “hottest” node (which is negative) are positive for melanoma, how low of a radioactivity should warrant harvest, and if isosulfan blue is necessary.

Methods

We reviewed 1,152 melanoma patients who underwent lymphoscintigraphy with technetium, with or without blue dye, and SLN dissection from 1996 to 2008. SLNs with radioactivity ≥10% of the “hottest” SLN, all blue nodes, and all suspicious nodes were removed and analyzed. The miss rate was calculated as the proportion of node positive cases in which the “hottest” SLN was negative.

Results

SLNs were identified in 1,520 nodal basins in 1,152 patients. SLN micrometastases were detected in 218 basins (14%) in 204 patients (18%). In 16% of SLN-positive patients (33/204 patients), the positive SLN was found to have a lower radioactive count than the “hottest” SLN, which was negative. In 21 of these cases, the positive SLNs had radioactivity ≤50% of the “hottest” SLN. The 10% rule significantly reduced the miss rate to 2.5% compared with removal of only the “hottest” SLN (miss rate = 16%). Also, blue dye did not significantly decrease the miss rate compared with radiocolloid alone using the 10% rule.

Conclusions

To decrease the miss rate, all SLNs with ≥10% of the ex vivo radioactivity of the “hottest” SLN should be removed and blue dye is not essential.     

Evaluation of the benefit of using blue dye in addition to radioisotope for sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast cancer

The techniques for performing sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) vary from institution to institution. Some advocate blue dye only, others radioisotope only, and many utilize a combination of both. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the additional benefit that blue dye provides when used in combination with a radioisotope. From October 2001 to June 2004, 102 SLNBs were attempted in 99 patients with breast cancer using a combination of blue dye and radioisotope. A lymph node was considered a sentinel lymph node (SLN) when it was stained with blue dye, had a blue lymphatic afferent, or had increased radioactivity. Ninety-eight patients had 101 successful identifications of SLNs, for an identification rate of 99%. Twenty-eight patients had positive SLNs. In three of those patients, although there were SLNs identified by both techniques, the positive SLNs were identified with only blue dye. Of the 102 SLNB procedures, there were two patients whose only SLN was identified by blue dye only. Although blue dye did not improve the identification rate, there was a definite benefit in improving the false-negative rate.     

Role of Combined Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Axillary Node Sampling in Clinically Node-Negative Breast Cancer

Axillary lymph node status is a prognostic marker in breast cancer management, and axillary surgery plays an important role in staging and local control. This study aims to assess whether a combination of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) using patent blue dye and axillary node sampling (ANS) offers equivalent identification rate to dual tracer technique. Furthermore, we aim to investigate whether there are any potential benefits to this combined technique. Retrospective study of 230 clinically node-negative patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery for single T1–T3 tumours between 2006 and 2011. Axillae were staged using a combined blue dye SLNB/ANS technique. SLNs were localized in 226/230 (identification rate 98.3 %). Three of one hundred ninety-two patients with a negative SLN were found to have positive ANS nodes and 1/4 failed SLNB patients had positive ANS nodes. Thirty-four of two hundred twenty-six patients had SLN metastases and 11/34 (32.4 %) also had a positive non-sentinel lymph node on ANS. Twenty-one of twenty-four (87.5 %) node-positive T1 tumours had single node involvement. Nine of thirty-eight node-positive patients progressed to completion axillary clearance (cALND), and the rest were treated with axillary radiotherapy. Axillary recurrence was nil at median 5 year follow-up. Complementing SLNB with axillary node sampling (ANS) decreases the unavoidable false-negative rate associated with SLNB. Appropriate operator experience and technique can result in an SLN localization rate of 98 %, rivalling a dual tracer technique. The additional insight offered by ANS into the status of non-sentinel nodes has potential applications in an era of less frequent cALND.     

腹腔镜下前哨淋巴结检测在早期宫颈癌中的应用

目的探讨早期宫颈癌腹腔镜下前哨淋巴结（Sentinel lymph node,SLN）检测的可行性及前哨淋巴结活检预测盆腔淋巴结转移状况的准确性,评价SLN活检在早期宫颈癌中的应用价值。方法选择诊断明确的早期宫颈癌患者26例,采用腹腔镜下广泛子宫切除术和盆腔淋巴结清扫术,术中从宫颈分4点注射1%亚甲蓝染料4ml行淋巴绘图,腹腔镜下识别和取蓝染淋巴结活检。蓝染淋巴结和手术的其他标本分别送病理检查,常规石蜡包埋切片、HE染色,以手术后所有切除的盆腔淋巴结常规HE染色病理检查结果为诊断金标准,观察SLN活检对预测盆腔淋巴结有无肿瘤转移的准确性、假阴性率等及SLN分布情况。结果26例宫颈癌中,23例成功检测出SLN,检出率为88.5%（23/26）。共检出SLN51枚,其中1个SLN者6例,2个SLN者9例,3个SLN者6例,4个SLN者1例,5个SLN者1例。双侧分布者占65.2%（15/23）。26例中,5例（19.2%）盆腔淋巴结有转移。23例SLN成功识别的患者中,3例（6枚）SLN存在转移。SLN转移且盆腔淋巴结有转移者2例,SLN是盆腔淋巴结唯一转移者1例,SLN无转移而盆腔淋巴结有转移者1例。SLN活检预测盆腔淋巴结的准确性为95.7%（22/23）,灵敏度为75%（3/4）,特异度为100%（19/19）,阴性预测值为95%（19/20）,SLN与盆腔淋巴结的转移有极好的一致性（κ=0.832）。结论采用腹腔镜技术可以较准确地检测出SLN,可以用于早期宫颈癌SLN活检;SLN能较准确地反映区域淋巴结的转移状况。     

Concordance and validation study of sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer using subareolar injection of blue dye and technetium 99m sulfur colloid

BACKGROUND: We have previously demonstrated the utility, accuracy, and advantages of a subareolar (SA) site of injection for blue dye compared with an intraparenchymal site. In later studies we advocated the additional use of preoperative SA-injected technetium 99m-labeled sulfur colloid as a directional aid in finding blue-stained sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). Paramount to the usefulness of this dual-tracer, same-site technique is the degree to which SA-injected blue dye and SA-injected radiocolloid migrate concordantly and are deposited within the same sentinel nodes. The purpose of this study was to document the correlation and accuracy of SLN biopsy using blue dye and radiocolloid when both nodal markers are injected by the same SA route. STUDY DESIGN: Between September 1999 and February 2002 (29 months), 185 consecutive patients with 187 operable breast cancers underwent 187 attempted SLN biopsies by a dual-tracer, same-site injection technique using the SA approach for both agents. Unfiltered technetium 99m-labeled sulfur colloid (1 mCi [37 MBq]) was SA-injected 30 to 45 minutes preoperatively; and just after anesthetic induction, 3 mL of 1% isosulfan blue dye was injected by the same SA route. SLN biopsies or complete axillary dissections were carried out, and SLNs identified during these procedures were classified as containing both blue dye and radioactivity ("blue-hot" nodes), radioactivity alone ("hot-only" nodes), or blue dye alone ("blue-only" nodes). Cases were categorized and tabulated based on the presence or absence of these three types of SLNs. RESULTS: Of the 187 procedures, a SLN was identified successfully in 184 cases, indicating an SLN identification rate of 98.4% (95% confidence interval, 96.6% to 100.2%). In these 184 cases, a blue-hot node was present in 94.5% (n = 174 of 184). An SLN was positive in 50 cases, or 27.2% of the total group (n = 50 of 184). A blue-hot node was the only positive SLN in 43 of these 50 cases, or 86% of the node-positive cases. There were no false negatives in 20 confirmatory axillary node dissections carried out to document the findings of a negative SLN. A correlation analysis revealed that in 98.9% of cases (174 of 176), blue nodes were also radioactive ("blue-hot" case concordance = 98.9%). In 95.1% of cases (174 of 183), hot nodes had also taken up blue dye ("hot-blue" case concordance = 95.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Using SA injections of both blue dye and radiocolloid, we achieved an SLN identification rate of 98.4% (184 of 187 cases), a false-negative rate of 0% (0 of 20 cases), and an accuracy in predicting the malignant status of the axilla of 100% (70 of 70 cases). The case concordance rate ranged between 98.9% ("blue-hot concordance") and 95.1% ("hot-blue concordance"). The present study is the first to evaluate dual-tracer, same-site SA injections of blue dye and radiocolloid. By demonstrating a high case concordance rate, a high SLN identification rate, and a 0% false-negative rate, this study adds further support to the validity and accuracy of same-site SA injections of both blue dye and radiocolloid during SLN biopsy in breast cancer.     

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy May Be Used to Support the Decision to Perform Modified Radical Neck Dissection in Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma

Background The prognostic significance of lymph node metastases (LNM) in follicle cell-derived differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) is still controversial. The management of cervical lymph nodes varies from “berry picking” to modified radical neck dissection (MRND). The incidence of LNM in papillary thyroid carcinoma varies from 27% to 80%. The importance of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for decisions about the surgical management of lymph nodes in DTC has been the subject of several previous studies. Patients and Methods In 40 patients with DTC methylene blue dye was applied peritumorally. Both SLN and non-SLN in the lower third of the jugulo-carotid chain were dissected prior to total thyroidectomy and routine dissection of the central neck compartment and examined by frozen-section and standard histology. MRND was performed in 9 cases of LNM in the lateral neck compartment. Results The SLN identification rate was 92.5%. Metastases in SLNs were revealed by frozen-section histology in 7 cases, leading to immediate MRND. The findings were confirmed on standard HE examination. In 2 false-negative cases SLN metastases were revealed on standard histology and MRND was performed 1 week later. The specificity of the method was 100%, sensitivity 77.7%, negative predictive value 94%, positive predictive value 100%, with overall accuracy of 95%. Conclusion Our results seem to imply that SLN biopsy in the jugulo-carotid chain using methylene blue dye mapping may be a feasible and valuable method for estimating lymph node status in the lateral neck compartment. It may be helpful in the detection of true-positive but nonpalpable lymph nodes, and in such cases may support the decision to perform MRND in patients with DTC. An erratum to this article is available at .     

Feasibility of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Lymphatic Mapping in Nodular Thyroid Neoplasms

Although the prognostic significance of occult lymph node metastases in thyroid cancer remains controversial, identifying these patients may help direct therapy. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and safety of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNBx) in thyroid nodular disease. Patients undergoing thyroid resection, with no evidence of clinical lymphadenopathy, were enrolled. The nodule was injected with isosulfan blue vital dye. Blue-stained lymphatic channels were traced within the central compartment to the SLN, which was excised. A total of 40 patients underwent SLNBx; lymphatics were seen in 31 patients, and SLNs were found in 26. In 11 patients the lymphatic vessels were traced through the central compartment into the lateral or mediastinal compartments, although a central SLN was retrieved in only 6. Of the 18 patients with benign neoplasms, 14 had benign SLNs, and no SLN was found in 4. A thyroid lymphoma patient had a true positive SLN. In the 12 patients with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), 6 had true positive SLNs, and 2 had a true negative SLN. In one patient with metastatic PTC, the parathyroid stained blue. Another patient with PTC had lateral lymphatic channels, but no SLN was found. There were two false negatives, proven by a node dissection in one and lateral uptake on ¹³¹I scanning in the other. There were no postoperative complications. SLNBx for thyroid disease is feasible and safe. Potential staining of the parathyroids makes their identification before injection mandatory. The variable lymphatic drainage patterns and the two false-negative nodes indicate that further investigation is required before the procedure can be recommended for patients with thyroid disease.     

Effect of lymphatic tumor burden on sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer

Distal obstruction of the lymphatics by tumor and extensive tumor infiltration of the draining lymph nodes may prevent migration of the tracer to the sentinel lymph node (SLN), adversely affecting SLN identification. Rerouting of lymphatic drainage may divert flow to internal mammary nodes and cause an alternative nonsentinel node to become "sentinel," increasing the risk of a false-negative result. A total of 618 breast cancer patients underwent SLN biopsy using 99mTc albumin colloid and patent blue V injected peritumorally. This was followed by standard axillary node clearance in all patients at the same operation. The overall SLN identification and false-negative rates were 96% (593/618) and 7.6% (17/223), respectively. There was no difference in the SLN identification rate and the false-negative rate with increasing axillary tumor burden (as determined by the total number of positive nodes in the axilla). Further detailed analyses are based on the 64 patients from one center (Cardiff) who had at least one positive SLN and proceeded to axillary clearance. A total of 83 positive SLNs were removed from 64 patients. Tumor burden in the positive SLN was assessed by measuring the size of the metastasis and percentage replacement of the SLN by tumor, and by documenting extranodal invasion. Increasing tumor burden in the SLN (as determined by percentage replacement of SLN by tumor and presence of extranodal invasion) was associated with decreased radioisotope uptake (p = 0.005 and p < 0.0001, respectively). There was no correlation between radioisotope uptake and the size of the metastasis in the SLN. There was no correlation between blue dye uptake, internal mammary drainage on lymphoscintiscan, and tumor burden in the positive SLN. In conclusion, increased axillary lymphatic tumor burden is not associated with failure to identify a SLN or false-negative results when both blue dye and radioisotope are used for SLN biopsy. In an individual SLN, the percentage replacement by tumor, but not the absolute size of the metastatic deposit is associated with reduced radioisotope uptake. Extranodal invasion in the SLN is a marker of lymphatic obstruction and is significantly associated with reduced radioisotope uptake. The lymphatic tumor burden does not seem to affect blue dye uptake or internal mammary drainage.     

结直肠癌前哨淋巴结体外标本定位及其微转移免疫组化研究

目的探讨结直肠癌前哨淋巴结（SLN）体外定位技术方法及其可行性、准确性和临床价值。方法选择2003年3月至2003年10月间中山大学肿瘤防治中心腹科住院行根治手术的结直肠癌患者60例,62个肿瘤（2例患者为多原发）,进行体外SLN定位。标本离体后尽早进行异硫蓝SLN定位,传统病理检查阴性的SLN进行细胞角蛋白免疫组化检查。结果62例肿瘤成功检出SLN的59例,检出率95．2％。59例患者总共获得并检测1114枚淋巴结,平均每人18．9（4～46）枚。其中SLN157枚（14．9％）,平均每人2．7（1～9）枚。SLN敏感性39．1％（9／23）,假阴性率23．7％（14／59）,准确率76．3％（45／59）。50例SLN阴性的中有12例（24％）细胞角蛋白免疫组化检测阳性。36例HE和细胞角蛋白免疫组化检查全阴性者中4例（11．1％）SLN发现微转移灶。14例仅非SLN阳性中8例SLN发现微转移灶。结论结直肠癌异硫蓝SLN体外定位活检技术是可行的,结合免疫组化检测微转移可以提高术后分期,可以提高送检淋巴结个数,结合免疫组化技术,可以减少淋巴结转移漏诊发生率。但该方法假阴性率较高,不能完全取代常规淋巴结病理检查。     

乳腺癌患者腋窝前哨淋巴结微转移及孤立癌细胞的评价

目的 评价连续切片及免疫组化技术在乳腺癌前哨淋巴结(SLN)转移诊断中的价值,探讨微转移和孤立癌细胞的临床意义.方法 对80例腋窝淋巴结阴性的乳腺癌患者,用99mTc-SC和异硫蓝联合法进行前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB),对所有SLN和非SLN进行常规HE染色及免疫组织化学分析.结果 78例(97.5%)成功检出SLN,其中76.5%的SLN同位素和染料检查均为阳性.32例(41%)SLN转移阳性,其中13例(40.6%)为微转移.共有14例(43.8%)患者SLN是惟一阳性的淋巴结.SLN预测腋窝状态的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为96.9%,100%和98.7%.SLN转移的患者,其SLN之外的转移率明显高于仅有微转移的患者(78.9%vs.23.1%).结论 连续切片及免疫组化技术是乳腺癌SLN转移诊断的敏感方法.仅有SLN微转移患者的SLN之外的腋窝淋巴结转移率低,但其预后意义及对手术方案的影响尚待进一步研究.     

Validation of sentinel node mapping in patients with colon cancer

Background Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping techniques have been validated in breast cancer and melanoma. This study summarizes our experience with SLN mapping for colon cancer. Methods Fifty-five patients with colon cancer underwent intraoperative SLN mapping. One mL of 1% isosulfan blue was injected subserosally around the tumor. The first nodes highlighted with blue were identified as the SLNs. SLNs underwent multiple sectioning and immunohistochemical staining for cytokeratin. The overall learning curve was calculated. Results Lymphatic mapping adequately identified at least 1 SLN in 45 patients (82%). SLNs adequately predicted regional status in 44 of 45 (98%) cases. In 9 of 45 cases (20%), the SLNs were the only sites of metastases. Among the 14 cases that were SLN positive, 6 of 55 patients (11%) were positive only by immunohistochemistry. Of the 31 cases with negative SLNs, 1 case had a 3.5-mm pericolonic tumor-replaced non-SLN (3% false-negative rate). The overall learning curve stabilized after five cases. Conclusions Intraoperative SLN mapping is a feasible technique, with a quick learning curve, and had a reasonable SLN identification rate. Negative SLNs accurately predict the status of non-SLNs 97% of the time. Eleven percent of patients were upstaged by demonstration of micrometastases and may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.     

Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy for breast cancer does not improve the ability to identify axillary sentinel lymph nodes

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for breast cancer. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Numerous studies have demonstrated that SLN biopsy can be used to stage axillary lymph nodes for breast cancer. SLN biopsy is performed using injection of radioactive colloid, blue dye, or both. When radioactive colloid is used, a preoperative lymphoscintigram (nuclear medicine scan) is often obtained to ease SLN identification. Whether a preoperative lymphoscintigram adds diagnostic accuracy to offset the additional time and cost required is not clear. METHODS: After informed consent was obtained, 805 patients were enrolled in the University of Louisville Breast Cancer Sentinel Lymph Node Study, a multiinstitutional study involving 99 surgeons. Patients with clinical stage T1-2, N0 breast cancer were eligible for the study. All patients underwent SLN biopsy, followed by level I/II axillary dissection. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy was performed at the discretion of the individual surgeon. Biopsy of nonaxillary SLNs was not required in the protocol. Chi-square analysis and analysis of variance were used for statistical comparison. RESULTS: Radioactive colloid injection was performed in 588 patients. In 560, peritumoral injection of isosulfan blue dye was also performed. A preoperative lymphoscintigram was obtained in 348 of the 588 patients (59%). The SLN was identified in 221 of 240 patients (92.1%) who did not undergo a preoperative lymphoscintigram, with a false-negative rate of 1.6%. In the 348 patients who underwent a preoperative lymphoscintigram, the SLN was identified in 310 (89.1%), with a false-negative rate of 8.7%. A mean of 2.2 and 2. 0 SLNs per patient were removed in the groups without and with a preoperative lymphoscintigram, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the SLN identification rate, false-negative rate, or number of SLNs removed when a preoperative lymphoscintigram was obtained. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy does not improve the ability to identify axillary SLN during surgery, nor does it decrease the false-negative rate. Routine preoperative lymphoscintigraphy is not necessary for the identification of axillary SLNs in breast cancer.     

Evaluation of dynamic lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel lymph-node biopsy for detecting occult metastases in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the introduction of dynamic lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel lymph-node (SLN) biopsy (used to detect occult lymph node metastases in patients with penile cancer and clinically impalpable inguinal lymph nodes at presentation) at a UK tertiary referral centre for penile cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 75 patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma of stage T1, grade > or = 2, and unilateral or bilateral impalpable groin nodes, were prospectively enrolled over a 2-year period. Patients underwent lymphoscintigraphy with (99m)technetium-labelled nanocolloid which was injected intradermally around the tumour or into the distal penile shaft skin. Four hours later, the SLN(s) were identified during surgery using a hand-held gamma-probe and intradermal injections with blue dye. Completion lymph node dissection was subsequently used in patients with tumour-positive SLNs. RESULTS: In all, 255 SLNs were removed from 143 groins; all excised nodes had taken up the radioactive marker, and the blue dye was evident in 87%. Eighteen of 75 (24%) patients and 21 of 143 groins (15%) had a tumour-positive SLN. All but one patient went on to completion lymph node dissection. Three of these 18 (17%) had further disease in other than SLNs. Six of 143 (4%) groins developed minor complications. One false-negative result was reported at a median (range) follow-up of 11 (2-24) months. CONCLUSION: This technique is feasible for managing penile cancer in a UK tertiary referral centre. The initial results suggest that it can accurately identify the SLN(s), which can then be removed for pathological review with minimal morbidity.