Formoterol: a review of its use in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Inhaled formoterol is a long-acting selective beta2-adrenoceptor agonist, with an onset of action of 5 minutes postdose and a bronchodilator effect that lasts for at least 12 hours. Statistically significant and clinically relevant (>120 ml) improvements in lung function [assessed using standardized/normalized area under the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) versus time curve (AUC FEV1)] were observed with inhaled formoterol 12 microg twice daily (the approved dosage in the US) compared with placebo in 12-week and 12-month, randomized, double-blind trials in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The bronchodilator efficacy of formoterol 12 microg twice daily was greater than that of oral slow-release theophylline (individualized dosages) in a 12-month trial or inhaled ipratropium bromide 40 microg four times daily in a 12-week trial. Improvement in AUC FEV1 with formoterol, but not theophylline, compared with placebo was observed in patients with irreversible or poorly-reversible airflow obstruction. Formoterol also significantly improved health-related quality of life compared with ipratropium bromide or placebo and significantly reduced symptoms compared with placebo. Combination therapy with formoterol 12 microg twice daily plus ipratropium bromide 40 microg four times daily was significantly more effective than albuterol (salbutamol) 200 microg four times daily plus the same dosage of ipratropium bromide in a 3-week, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover trial. Inhaled formoterol was well tolerated in clinical trials. The incidence of investigator-determined drug-related adverse events with inhaled formoterol 12 microg twice daily was similar to that with placebo and inhaled ipratropium bromide 40 microg four times daily but lower than that with oral slow-release theophylline (individualized dosages). Importantly, there were no significant differences between formoterol and placebo or comparator drugs in cardiovascular adverse events in patients with COPD and corrected QT interval values within the normal range. In conclusion, inhaled formoterol improved lung function and health-related quality of life and reduced symptoms relative to placebo in clinical trials in patients with COPD. The drug had greater bronchodilator efficacy than oral slow-release theophylline or inhaled ipratropium bromide and showed efficacy in combination with ipratropium bromide. The adverse events profile (including cardiovascular adverse events) with formoterol was similar to that with placebo. Thus, inhaled formoterol may be considered as a first-line option for the management of bronchoconstriction in patients with COPD who require regular bronchodilator therapy for the management of symptoms.     

Effects of formoterol and ipratropium bromide in COPD: a 3-month placebo-controlled study.

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of formoterol, ipratropium bromide and a placebo on walking distance, lung function, symptoms and quality of life (QoL) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. A total of 183 patients (mean age 64 yrs, 86 female) with moderate-to-severe nonreversible COPD participated in this randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study. After a 2-week placebo run-in, patients were randomised to formoterol Turbuhaler 18 microg b.i.d. (delivered dose), ipratropium bromide 80 microg t.i.d. via a pressurised metered dose inhaler, or placebo for 12 weeks. Inhaled short-acting beta2-agonists were allowed as relief medication and inhaled glucocorticosteroids were allowed at a constant dose. The primary variable was walking distance in the shuttle walking test (SWT). Baseline mean SWT distance was 325 m, mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was 40% predicted. Clinically significant improvements in SWT (>30 m) were seen in 41, 38 and 30% of formoterol, ipratropium and placebo patients, respectively (not significant). Mean increases from run-in were 19, 17 and 5 m in the formoterol, ipratropium and placebo groups, respectively. Both active treatments significantly improved FEV1, forced vital capacity, peak expiratory flow and daytime dyspnoea score compared with placebo. Formoterol reduced relief medication use compared with placebo. Neither active treatment improved QoL. Formoterol and ipratropium improved airway function and symptoms, without significant improvements in the shuttle walking test.     

Effects of formoterol on exercise tolerance in severely disabled patients with COPD

OBJECTIVE: We wished to evaluate the effects of inhaled formoterol, a long-acting beta(2)-adrenergic agonist, on exercise tolerance and dynamic hyperinflation (DH) in severely disabled chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. DESIGN: In a two-period, crossover study, 21 patients with advanced COPD (FEV(1)=38.8+/-11.7% predicted, 16 patients GOLD stages III-IV) were randomly allocated to receive inhaled formoterol fumarate 12 microg twice daily for 14 days followed by placebo for 14 days, or vice versa. Patients performed constant work-rate cardiopulmonary exercise tests to the limit of tolerance (Tlim) on a cycle ergometer: inspiratory capacity (IC) was obtained at rest and each minute during exercise. Baseline and transitional dyspnoea indices (BDI and TDI) were also recorded. RESULTS: Eighteen patients completed both treatment periods. Formoterol treatment was associated with an estimated increase of 130 s in Tlim compared with placebo (P=0.052): this corresponded to a 37.8% improvement over placebo (P=0.012). Enhanced exercise tolerance after bronchodilator was associated with diminished DH marked by higher inspiratory reserve and tidal volumes at isotime and exercise cessation (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between formoterol and placebo on exercise dyspnoea ratings; however, all domains of the TDI improved (P相似文献   

The pulmonary and extra-pulmonary effects of high-dose formoterol in COPD: a comparison with salbutamol

OBJECTIVES: Formoterol, a beta(2) agonist with a rapid onset of effect and long duration of action, can be used as maintenance and reliever medication for asthma and COPD. We compared the pulmonary and extra-pulmonary effects of cumulative doses of formoterol and salbutamol in patients with COPD to assess efficacy and safety. METHODOLOGY: In a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study, 12 patients with moderate to severe COPD inhaled, via Turbuhaler, 10 doses of formoterol (total metered dose, 120 microg, equivalent to a 90- microg delivered dose), salbutamol (total metered dose 2000 microg) or placebo at 2-min intervals on separate days. The effects on lung function (FEV(1) and PEF), heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, corrected QT interval (QTc), T-wave height and plasma potassium were assessed before each dose, 15 min after each dose, and at half-hourly intervals for 3 h following the final dose. RESULTS: Inhalation of formoterol or salbutamol resulted in significant improvement in lung function (measured 30 min after the last dose) when compared with placebo. There were no clinically important or statistically significant changes in heart rate, QTc, T-wave height, plasma potassium, oxygen saturation, or systolic and diastolic blood pressures with formoterol or salbutamol. One patient developed ventricular trigeminy after both formoterol and salbutamol. She had had ventricular ectopics on her screening electrocardiogram. CONCLUSION: Formoterol and salbutamol both produced significant improvement in lung function and were similarly well tolerated in high doses, as might be taken by a patient for relief of COPD symptoms.     

Formoterol

Abstract

Inhaled formoterol is a long-acting selective β₂-adrenoceptor agonist, with an onset of action of 5 minutes postdose and a bronchodilator effect that lasts for at least 12 hours.Statistically significant and clinically relevant (> 120ml) improvements in lung function [assessed using standardized/normalized area under the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) versus time curve (AUC FEV₁)] were observed with inhaled formoterol 12μg twice daily (the approved dosage in the US) compared with placebo in 12-week and 12-month, randomized, double-blind trials in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).The bronchodilator efficacy of formoterol 12μg twice daily was greater than that of oral slow-release theophylline (individualized dosages) in a 12-month trial or inhaled ipratropium bromide 40μg four times daily in a 12-week trial. Improvement in AUC FEV₁ with formoterol, but not theophylline, compared with placebo was observed in patients with irreversible or poorly-reversible airflow obstruction. Formoterol also significantly improved health-related quality of life compared with ipratropium bromide or placebo and significantly reduced symptoms compared with placebo. Combination therapy with formoterol 12μg twice daily plus ipratropium bromide 40μg four times daily was significantly more effective than albuterol (salbutamol) 200μg four times daily plus the same dosage of ipratropium bromide in a 3-week, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover trial.Inhaled formoterol was well tolerated in clinical trials. The incidence of investigator-determined drug-related adverse events with inhaled formoterol 12μg twice daily was similar to that with placebo and inhaled ipratropium bromide 40μg four times daily but lower than that with oral slow-release theophylline (individualized dosages). Importantly, there were no significant differences between formoterol and placebo or comparator drugs in cardiovascular adverse events in patients with COPD and corrected QT interval values within the normal range.In conclusion, inhaled formoterol improved lung function and health-related quality of life and reduced symptoms relative to placebo in clinical trials in patients with COPD. The drug had greater bronchodilator efficacy than oral slow-release theophylline or inhaled ipratropium bromide and showed efficacy in combination with ipratropium bromide. The adverse events profile (including cardiovascular adverse events) with formoterol was similar to that with placebo. Thus, inhaled formoterol may be considered as a first-line option for the management of bronchoconstriction in patients with COPD who require regular bronchodilator therapy for the management of symptoms.

Pharmacodynamic Properties

Inhaled formoterol is a long-acting selective β₂-adrenoceptor agonist (β₂-agonist); it has a rapid onset of action (5 minutes in single- and multiple-dose studies) and, like salmeterol, maintains a bronchodilator effect for at least 12 hours. The onset of postdose bronchodilator action was faster with formoterol 12μg than with salmeterol 100μg in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.Formoterol 6 to 24μg improved forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) compared with baseline and placebo in single-dose crossover trials in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and was at least as effective as salmeterol 50 or 100μg or albuterol (salbutamol) 400μg at improving FEV₁. Mean peak FEV₁ was reached 1 hour after inhalation of formoterol 12μg; values for this parameter were 1 hour after albuterol 200μg, and 2 to 5 hours after salmeterol 50μg.Formoterol 4.5 to 18μg twice daily for 1 week prolonged the time to exhaustion on a bicycle ergometer test compared with placebo; results were similar to those for ipratropium bromide 80μg three times daily.All β₂-agonists have the potential to increase heart rate and plasma glucose concentrations, and to decrease plasma potassium concentrations, through effects on extrapulmonary β₂ receptors. Dose-dependent increases in heart rate, corrected QT (QTc) interval and plasma glucose concentrations, and dose-dependent decreases in plasma potassium concentrations, were observed with inhaled formoterol 24 to 96μg or salmeterol 100 to 400μg in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial in 16 healthy volunteers. In patients with COPD, pre-existing mild to moderate cardiac arrhythmias and hypoxemia [PaO₂ (arterial oxygen pressure) <60mm Hg], formoterol 12μg had similar systemic effects to salmeterol 50μg. Complex ventricular arrhythmias were observed in formoterol 12 and 24μg recipients, but not in salmeterol 50μg or placebo recipients.

Pharmacokinetic Properties

The maximum plasma concentration (92 ng/L) of formoterol was reached within 5 minutes of inhalation of a single supraoptimal dose (120μg) in 12 healthy volunteers. Urinary excretion data suggest that absorption was linear with inhaled formoterol 12 to 96μg in ten healthy volunteers. In vitro plasma protein binding of formoterol was 61 to 64% at concentrations 0.1 to 100 μg/L.Mean plasma concentrations of the drug at 10 minutes to 6 hours postinhalation were 4.0 to 8.8 ng/L and 8.0 to 17.3 ng/L, respectively, after multiple doses of formoterol 12 or 24μg administered twice daily for 12 weeks in patients with COPD, with some evidence of accumulation of formoterol in the plasma (accumulation index 1.19 to 1.38).Formoterol is metabolized primarily in the liver by four cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes (CYP2D6, CYP2C19, CYP2C9 and CYP2A6). These enzymes were not inhibited by the drug at therapeutic concentrations. Following inhalation of formoterol 12 or 24μg by 18 patients with COPD, 7% of the total dose was excreted in the urine as unchanged drug and 6 to 9% of the total dose was eliminated as direct conjugates of formoterol. The mean terminal elimination half-life was determined to be 10 hours (based on plasma concentrations) following inhalation of single-dose formoterol 120μg by 12 healthy volunteers.Currently, there are no pharmacokinetic data for the use of formoterol in patients with hepatic or renal impairment or in elderly individuals.

Therapeutic Efficacy

Inhaled formoterol has been evaluated as monotherapy or combination therapy for the management of patients with COPD. In clinical trials, COPD was diagnosed using the American Thoracic Society guidelines.The bronchodilator effect [measured as normalized area under the FEV₁ versus time curve (AUC FEV₁)] with formoterol 12μg twice daily (n = 194) was significantly greater than that with ipratropium bromide 40μg four times daily (n = 194; p = 0.001) or placebo (n = 200; p < 0.001) in a randomized, double-blind, 12-week trial in patients with COPD. Significant improvements were also observed in mean morning premedication peak expiratory flow (PEF; p < 0.001) and health-related quality of life [all three subsections of the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ); p ≤ 0.036], and significant reductions were reported for the use of rescue medication (p ≤ 0.014) and the percentage of ‘bad days’ (days with at least two individual symptom scores of ≥2 and/or a reduction in PEF from baseline of >20%; p < 0.001) in formoterol compared with ipratropium bromide recipients. The differences in health-related quality of life between the two treatments were clinically relevant (exceeding 4 points) for the Activity and the Impacts domains of the SGRQ.Compared with oral slow-release theophylline (individualized dosages targeted at plasma concentrations of 8 to 20 mg/L), formoterol 12μg twice daily significantly increased standardized AUC_12h FEV₁ (primary end-point; p = 0.026) and mean morning premedication PEF (p ≤ 0.020) and reduced the percentage of ‘bad days’ (p ≤ 0.035) in a randomized, double-blind (with the exception of the theophylline arm), 12-month trial. A subgroup analysis in this trial indicated that at 3 (p = 0.007) and 12 months (p = 0.002), formoterol (n = 118), but not oral slow-release theophylline (n = 105), produced significant bronchodilation compared with placebo (n = 117) in patients with irreversible or poorly-reversible airflow obstruction (i.e. patients whose FEV₁ values increased <15% after receiving albuterol). Both formoterol (p ≤ 0.026) and oral slow-release theophylline (p ≤ 0.013) were significantly more effective than placebo at managing COPD during the night (measured as morning premedication FEV₁).In these two monotherapy trials, inhaled formoterol 24μg twice daily did not provide any additional benefit over the 12μg twice daily dosage in patients with COPD.The combined efficacy of inhaled formoterol 12μg twice daily plus inhaled ipratropium bromide 40μg four times daily for 3 weeks has been compared with that of albuterol 200μg four times daily for 3 weeks via a pressurized metered-dose inhaler plus inhaled ipratropium bromide 40μg four times daily in a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover trial in 172 patients with COPD. Formoterol combination therapy was significantly more effective than albuterol combination therapy at increasing mean morning premedication PEF (primary endpoint; p = 0.0003). Combination therapy with formoterol was also more effective according to secondary endpoints, significantly increasing postmedication FEV₁ to 6 hours (p< 0.0001), peak postmedication FEV₁ (p < 0.0001) and AUC FEV₁ (p < 0.0001) and improving symptoms of COPD (measured as mean total symptoms score, p = 0.0042) and the SGRQ symptoms score (p = 0.0408) relative to albuterol combination therapy.

Tolerability

Inhaled formoterol was well tolerated in clinical trials in patients with COPD. The percentage of patients experiencing at least one adverse event with inhaled formoterol 12μg twice daily was similar to that with placebo, inhaled ipratropium bromide 40μg four times daily or oral slow-release theophylline (individualized dosages targeted at plasma concentrations of the drug of 8 to 20 mg/L) in randomized, double-blind, comparative trials of 12 weeks’ and 12 months’ duration. Viral infection, exacerbation of COPD, bronchitis, upper respiratory tract infection, dyspnea and headache were the most commonly reported adverse events (i.e. occurring in >5% of formoterol 12μg twice daily recipients); however, the incidence of these events was not significantly different compared with oral slow-release theophylline or placebo.Drug-related adverse events, serious adverse events and events leading to withdrawal from the study occurred with a similar incidence with inhaled formoterol, placebo or ipratropium bromide. In contrast, drug-related adverse events and withdrawal because of adverse events occurred with a higher incidence in patients receiving oral slow-release theophylline in the 12-month trial.There were no significant differences in the incidence of cardiovascular adverse events with inhaled formoterol (0.5% of patients) compared with inhaled placebo (2.5%) or ipratropium bromide (2.6%) after 12 weeks’ treatment or in the incidence of serious cardiovascular adverse events with inhaled formoterol (2.4% of patients) compared with placebo (0.9%) or oral slow-release theophylline (2.4%) after 12 months’ treatment in patients with COPD and QTc interval values within the normal range; heart rate and rhythm disorders were infrequent. The incidences of QTc interval prolongation (>0.46s), ECG abnormalities or clinically relevant changes in serum potassium or fasting plasma glucose concentrations were similar with inhaled formoterol 12μg twice daily compared with placebo, inhaled ipratropium bromide or oral slow-release theophylline in clinical trials.

Dosage and Administration

Formoterol, inhaled orally using an Aerolizer?1 inhaler, is indicated in the US for the long-term maintenance treatment of bronchoconstriction associated with COPD (including chronic bronchitis and emphysema). The recommended dosage of formoterol in this patient group is 12μg twice daily approximately 12 hours apart; the total daily dose should not exceed 24μg.Formoterol should be used with caution in patients with cardiovascular disorders (especially coronary insufficiency, cardiac arrhythmias or hypertension), convulsive disorders or thyrotoxicosis, or hypersensitivity to sympathomimetic amines. Extreme caution is advised if formoterol is used concomitantly with monoamine oxidase inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants or drugs that are known to prolong the QTc interval, and caution is recommended with the concomitant use of formoterol and non-potassium-sparing diuretics.

     

Effect of inhaled bronchodilators on inspiratory capacity and dyspnoea at rest in COPD.

It has been shown that patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) develop dynamic hyperinflation (DH), which contributes to dyspnoea and exercise intolerance. Formoterol, salmeterol and oxitropium have been recommended for maintenance therapy in COPD patients, but their effect on DH has only been assessed for salmeterol. The aim of the present study was to compare the acute effect of four inhaled bronchodilators (salbutamol, formoterol, salmeterol and oxitropium) and placebo on forced expiratory volume in one second, inspiratory capacity, forced vital capacity and dyspnoea in COPD patients. A cross-over, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was carried out on 20 COPD patients. Patients underwent pulmonary function testing and dyspnoea evaluation, in basal condition and 5, 15, 30, 60 and 120 min after bronchodilator or placebo administration. The results indicate that in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with decreased baseline inspiratory capacity, there was a much greater increase of inspiratory capacity after bronchodilator administration, which correlated closely with the improvement of dyspnoea sensation at rest. For all bronchodilators used, inspiratory capacity reversibility should be tested at 30 min following the bronchodilator. On average, formoterol elicited the greatest increase in inspiratory capacity than the other bronchodilators used, though the difference was significant only with salmeterol and oxitropium. The potential advantage of formoterol needs to be tested in a larger patient population.     

In patients with COPD, treatment with a combination of formoterol and ipratropium is more effective than a combination of salbutamol and ipratropium : a 3-week, randomized, double-blind, within-patient, multicenter study

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of adding formoterol or salbutamol to regular ipratropium bromide treatment in COPD patients whose conditions were suboptimally controlled with ipratropium bromide alone. DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, two-period, crossover clinical trial. SETTING: Twenty-four clinics and university medical centers in nine countries. PATIENTS: One hundred seventy-two patients with baseline FEV(1) < or = 65% predicted, with FEV(1) reversibility to salbutamol not exceeding the normal variability of the measurement, and symptomatic despite regular treatment with ipratropium bromide. INTERVENTIONS: Each patient received two treatments in random order: either inhaled formoterol dry powder, 12 microg bid, in addition to ipratropium bromide, 40 microg qid for 3 weeks, followed by salbutamol, 200 microg qid, in addition to ipratropium, 40 microg qid for 3 weeks, or vice versa. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Efficacy end points included morning premedication peak expiratory flow (PEF) during the last week of treatment (primary end point), the area under the curve (AUC) for FEV(1) measured for 6 h after morning dose on the last day of treatment, and symptom scores (from daily diary recordings). Morning PEF and the AUC for FEV(1) were significantly better for formoterol/ipratropium than for salbutamol/ipratropium (p = 0.0003 and p < 0.0001, respectively). The formoterol/ipratropium combination also induced a greater improvement in mean total symptom scores (p = 0.0042). The safety profile of the two treatments was comparable. CONCLUSIONS: In COPD patients requiring combination bronchodilator treatment, the addition of formoterol to regular ipratropium treatment is more effective than the addition of salbutamol.     

Efficacy of salmeterol xinafoate in the treatment of COPD

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To examine and compare the efficacy and safety of salmeterol xinafoate, a long-acting inhaled beta2-adrenergic agonist, with inhaled ipratropium bromide and inhaled placebo in patients with COPD. DESIGN: A stratified, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, parallel group clinical trial. SETTING: Multiple sites at clinics and university medical centers throughout the United States. PATIENTS: Four hundred eleven symptomatic patients with COPD with FEV1 < or = 65% predicted and no clinically significant concurrent disease. Interventions: Comparison of inhaled salmeterol (42 microg twice daily), inhaled ipratropium bromide (36 microg four times a day), and inhaled placebo (2 puffs four times a day) over 12 weeks. RESULTS: Salmeterol xinafoate was significantly (p < 0.0001) better than placebo and ipratropium in improving lung function at the recommended doses over the 12-week trial. Both salmeterol and ipratropium reduced dyspnea related to activities of daily living compared with placebo; this improvement was associated with reduced use of supplemental albuterol. Analyses of time to first COPD exacerbation revealed salmeterol to be superior to placebo and ipratropium (p < 0.05). Adverse effects were similar among the three treatments. CONCLUSIONS: These collective data support the use of salmeterol as first-line bronchodilator therapy for the long-term treatment of airflow obstruction in patients with COPD.     

Formoterol for maintenance and as-needed treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Formoterol is a long-acting beta2-agonist with a rapid onset of effect in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), making it potentially suitable for both maintenance and as-needed bronchodilator treatment. To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of maintenance formoterol in patients with COPD and to compare the effects of additional formoterol as needed with terbutaline. In this 6-month, double-blind study, 657 patients with COPD (40 years, forced expiratory volume in 1s [FEV1] 40-70% predicted normal) were randomized to formoterol 9 microg twice daily (bid) plus terbutaline 0.5 mg as needed (FORM bid), formoterol 9 microg bid plus formoterol 4.5 microg as needed (FORM bid+prn), or placebo bid plus terbutaline 0.5 mg as needed (placebo), all administered via Turbuhaler. Primary efficacy variables were FEV1 and the sum of breathlessness and chest tightness scores combined symptom score. Formoterol significantly (P<0.01) increased FEV(1) compared with placebo: FORM bid 6.5% (95% CI: 2.5, 10.7%); FORM bid+prn 11.8% (95% CI: 7.7, 16.2%). Combined symptom score decreased significantly in both formoterol groups compared with placebo: FORM bid -0.27 (95% CI: -0.49, -0.06; P=0.012); FORM bid+prn -0.32 (95% CI: -0.53, -0.11; P=0.0026). Similar significant (P<0.05) improvements were seen in both formoterol groups for morning peak expiratory flow, cough and sleep scores, and reliever use. In this study, formoterol 9 microg bid via Turbuhaler as maintenance therapy, with either formoterol or terbutaline as rescue medication, provided sustained improvements in lung function and COPD symptoms. Both formoterol regimens were well tolerated with no differences in adverse events or electrocardiogram profiles.     

Formoterol in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Bronchodilators represent the hallmark of symptomatic treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). There are four categories of bronchodilators: anticholinergics, methylxanthines, short-acting β₂-agonists, and long-acting β₂-agonists such as formoterol. Significant research has been performed to investigate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of formoterol in the therapeutic field of COPD. Formoterol exhibits a rapid onset of bronchodilation similar to that observed with salbutamol, yet its long bronchodilatory duration is comparable to salmeterol. In addition, formoterol presents with a clear superiority in lung function improvement compared with either ipratropium bromide or oral theophylline, while its efficacy improves when administered in combination with ipratropium. Formoterol has been shown to better reduce dynamic hyperinflation, which is responsible for exercise intolerance and dyspnea in COPD patients, compared with other bronchodilators, whereas it exerts synergistic effect with tiotropium. Moreover, formoterol reduces exacerbations, increases days free of use of rescue medication and improves patients’ quality of life and disease symptoms. Formoterol has a favorable safety profile and is better tolerated than theophylline. Collectively, data extracted from multicenter clinical trials support formoterol as a valid therapeutic option in the treatment of COPD.     

Effects of formoterol (Oxis Turbuhaler) and ipratropium on exercise capacity in patients with COPD

Although long-acting inhaled beta 2-agonists improve various outcome measures in COPD, no double-blind study has yet shown a significant effect of these drugs on exercise capacity. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, patients received formoterol (4, 5, 9, or 18 micrograms b.i.d. via Turbuhaler), ipratropium bromide (80 micrograms t.i.d. via pMDI with spacer), or placebo for 1 week. Main endpoint was time to exhaustion (TTE) in an incremental cycle ergometer test. Secondary endpoints were Borg dyspnoea score during exercise, lung function, and adverse events. Thirty-four patients with COPD were included, mean age 64.8 years, FEV1 55.6% predicted, reversibility 6.1% predicted. All doses of formoterol, and ipratropium significantly improved TTE, FEV1, FEF25-75%, FRC, IVC, RV and sGAW compared with placebo. A negative dose-response relationship was observed with formoterol. Ipratropium increased time to exhaustion more compared with formoterol, 18 micrograms, but not with formoterol, 4.5 and 9 micrograms. No changes in Borg score were found. There was no difference in the adverse event profile between treatments. In conclusion, 1 week of treatment with formoterol and ipratropium significantly improved exercise capacity and lung function compared with placebo. However, a negative dose-response relation for formoterol was unexpected and needs further investigation.     

Effects of short-acting bronchodilators added to maintenance tiotropium therapy

BACKGROUND: Combining bronchodilators has been shown to be beneficial in patients with COPD. The additive effects of short-acting bronchodilators added to maintenance tiotropium therapy, however, are unknown. METHODS: Following 3 weeks of tiotropium pretreatment, 60 patients with COPD (FEV1 40% of predicted) participated in a randomized, placebo-controlled study to assess add-on bronchodilator effects of ipratropium bromide (40 microg) or fenoterol (200 microg). Short-acting bronchodilators were added as a single dose 2 h and 8 h after tiotropium dosing. Serial lung function tests were performed over 9 h. RESULTS: The peak FEV1 add-on response within 6 h with fenoterol was significantly greater than with placebo (137 mL) or ipratropium (84 mL); the response with ipratropium was slightly but significantly larger than with placebo (52 mL). One hour after the second dose of the test drugs, a similar order of treatment responses was found. The peak FVC add-on response was significant for fenoterol (249 mL) but not for ipratropium (42 mL). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, both short-acting bronchodilator classes were effective when added to maintenance treatment with tiotropium. The addition of the beta2-adrenergic fenoterol provided greater additional bronchodilatation than the short-acting anticholinergic ipratropium. This is consistent with the expected effects of combining bronchodilators with different pharmacologic mechanisms. This randomized controlled trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00274066).     

Efficacy and safety of formoterol for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Formoterol is a selective long-acting beta2-adrenergic receptor agonist (LABA) that provides significant and sustained bronchodilatory effect for up to 12h following a single dose. The onset of effect is significantly faster with formoterol compared with an alternative LABA, salmeterol, although both have a similar duration of action. The overall efficacy of formoterol in improving lung function and controlling symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is comparable to that of salmeterol and potentially superior to that of ipratropium or theophylline. Formoterol provides additional benefit when administered in combination with other bronchodilators or inhaled corticosteroids. In clinical studies, formoterol was well tolerated and had an adverse-event profile similar to that of other beta2-adrenergic receptor agonists. Formoterol is a rapidly acting, well-tolerated, effective beta2-adrenergic receptor agonist that can be regularly used as a long-acting bronchodilator for patients with moderate to severe COPD, as per recommendations of the current treatment guidelines.     

Inhaled formoterol dry powder versus ipratropium bromide in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

We compared the effectiveness of inhaled formoterol with that of ipratropium in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). After a 2-wk run-in period, 780 patients with COPD were randomized to receive for 12 wk formoterol dry powder 12 or 24 microg twice daily, ipratropium bromide 40 microg four times daily, or placebo in a multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group study. The primary efficacy variable was the area under the curve for forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) measured over 12 h after 12 wk of treatment. Secondary variables included diary symptoms and quality of life. Both doses of formoterol and ipratropium significantly increased the area under the curve for FEV(1) in comparison with placebo (all p < 0.001). Both doses of formoterol were also significantly superior to ipratropium (all p < 0.025). Compared with placebo, both doses of formoterol significantly improved symptoms (all p < or = 0.007) and quality of life (p < 0.01 for total scores) whereas ipratropium did not show significant effects (all p > or = 0.3). All study treatments exhibited a similar safety profile. We conclude that formoterol is more effective than ipratropium bromide in the treatment of COPD, as the efficacy of ipratropium on airflow obstruction does not translate into a clinical benefit that patients can perceive.     

Tiotropium Bromide

Tiotropium bromide (Spiriva) is a long-acting anticholinergic bronchodilator that maintains bronchodilation for at least 24 hours, allowing once-daily administration. The active moiety is the tiotropium cation (tiotropium); tiotropium bromide 22.5 micrograms is equivalent to 18 micrograms of tiotropium cation. Greater improvements in lung function from baseline (primary endpoint mean trough FEV(1)) were observed with inhaled tiotropium 18 micrograms once daily than with placebo in 6-month and 1-year randomized, double-blind trials in patients with COPD. Tiotropium improved lung function (trough FEV(1) response) more effectively than ipratropium bromide (ipratropium) 40 micrograms four times daily in 1-year clinical trials, and was at least as effective as salmeterol 50 micrograms 12-hourly in 6-month trials. Preliminary data suggest that tiotropium alone or in combination with once-daily formoterol has a greater bronchodilator effect than twice-daily formoterol in patients with COPD. Improvements in patients' perception of health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) or dyspnea were greater with tiotropium than with placebo or ipratropium, and were similar to those with salmeterol. Reductions in the frequency and severity of acute exacerbations and in the use of rescue medication were also greater with tiotropium than with ipratropium or placebo. There was no evidence of tachyphylaxis with tiotropium during 1-year clinical trials. Inhaled tiotropium was generally well tolerated in clinical trials. Apart from dry mouth, the type and incidence of adverse events with tiotropium were similar to those with ipratropium, salmeterol or placebo in patients with COPD. In conclusion, inhaled tiotropium 18 micrograms once daily improved lung function, dyspnea, and HR-QOL, and decreased the incidence of acute COPD exacerbations and the use of rescue medication relative to placebo or ipratropium in clinical trials in patients with COPD. Tiotropium was at least as effective as salmeterol in terms of bronchodilator efficacy and improvements in dyspnea or HR-QOL. With the exception of dry mouth, the tolerability profile of tiotropium was similar to that with placebo, ipratropium, or salmeterol. Consequently, inhaled tiotropium is likely to be a valuable option for first-line, long-term maintenance therapy in the management of bronchoconstriction in patients with symptomatic COPD. Tiotropium bromide has a quaternary ammonium structure and acts as an anticholinergic bronchodilator; the active moiety is the tiotropium cation (tiotropium). A 22.5 micrograms dose of tiotropium bromide provides 18 micrograms of tiotropium. Orally inhaled tiotropium bromide antagonizes the muscarinic M(1), M(2), and M(3) receptors located in airway smooth muscle, reversing vagally mediated bronchoconstriction. Receptor binding assays and in vitro tests indicate that tiotropium bromide is kinetically selective for M(1) and M(3) receptors over the M(2) receptor, unlike ipratropium bromide, which is nonselective. Animal and in vitro studies showed that tiotropium bromide was more potent ( approximate, equals 20-fold) than ipratropium bromide in displacing [(3)H]N-methylscopolamine (NMS) from muscarinic receptors, and had a more sustained protective effect (>70% inhibition) against NMS binding. Tiotropium bromide was a more potent inhibitor of bronchial contraction than atropine ( approximate, equals 23-fold), and had a slower onset and markedly longer duration of action than atropine or an equipotent dose of ipratropium bromide. Aerosol particle penetration is improved with tiotropium, without delaying mucus clearance from the lungs. Tiotropium 4.5-36 micrograms once daily for 4 weeks increased mean trough and average FEV(1) and FVC and mean PEFR values from baseline compared with placebo, with no evidence of tachyphylaxis. Improvements in trough FEV(1) from baseline with tiotropium 4.5-36 micrograms were not dose dependent. Based on a lack of dose response, the optimal once-daily tiotropium dosage is 18 micrograms. Steady-state trough FEV(1) values are achieved within 48 hours of commencing tiotrochodilation (for >/=24 hours) and an attenuation of the nocturnal decline in FEV(1) that were unaffected by timing of the daily tiotropium dose were seen in randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies in patients with stable COPD. The drug improved static and dynamic lung hyperinflation (evidenced by reduced trapped air volume and increased tidal volume and end-of-exercise inspiratory capacity), and improved exertional dyspnea (during activities of daily living and exertion) and exercise tolerance compared with placebo in randomized, double-blind studies. In patients with stable COPD, improved sleep-related oxygen desaturation that was unaffected by the timing of the daily dose was seen with tiotropium but not with placebo. Clinically significant treatment-related disorders of conduction or rhythm, or changes in heart rate were not observed with tiotropium in this patient group. Mean maximal plasma concentrations (C(max)) were observed within 5 minutes of inhalation of a single dose of tiotropium 18 micrograms in patients with COPD. Plasma drug levels declined to minimum concentrations (C(min)) within 1 hour of treatment in healthy volunteers. Mean steady-state C(max) concentrations (16 ng/L) were achieved after 2-3 weeks of once-daily inhaled tiotropium 18 micrograms in elderly patients with COPD; tiotropium does not appear to accumulate once steady-state has been achieved.The estimated absolute bioavailability of tiotropium at steady state in healthy volunteers was approximately 20-25%, and approximately 72% of the drug is bound to plasma proteins. Excretion of tiotropium is predominantly renal (through active secretion by the kidneys), although in vitro studies suggest that cytochrome P450 (CYP) oxidation (possibly involving CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 enzymes) may have a minor role. In patients with COPD, renal excretion of the unchanged drug at 24 hours (Ae(24)) was approximately 7%. The mean plasma elimination half-life after single or multiple doses in healthy volunteers and elderly patients with COPD was approximately 5-6 days. The renal clearance and urinary excretion of tiotropium decrease with increasing age; however, these changes are not considered to be clinically significant. Because of altered steady-state C(max), C(min), area under the concentration-time curve, and Ae(24) values, caution is required with tiotropium administration in patients with moderate-to-severe renal impairment. The pharmacokinetics of tiotropium in patients with severe renal or hepatic impairment have not been studied. Tiotropium does not interact with drugs such as cimetidine or ranitidine, which are also eliminated by active renal secretion. Orally inhaled tiotropium bromide has been evaluated as a bronchodilator for the management of patients with COPD in randomized, double-blind 6-month and 1-year trials, and in several shorter studies. In clinical trials, COPD was diagnosed according to the American Thoracic Society guidelines. The bronchodilator effect was expressed as the trough FEV(1) response (the mean change in FEV(1) from baseline measured 1 hour prior to and immediately before a scheduled dose), and was the primary endpoint in all but two clinical trials. The bronchodilator effect with tiotropium 18 micrograms once daily was superior to that with placebo in several well designed trials in patients with COPD. Moreover, greater improvements in mean peak and average FEV(1) responses occurred with tiotropium but not with placebo. Mean trough, peak, and average FVC responses, and weekly mean morning and evening PEFR values were also improved to a greater extent with tiotropium than with placebo. Tiotropium demonstrated a greater bronchodilator effect than ipratropium bromide (hereafter referred to as ipratropium when used at approved dosages) 40 micrograms four times daily in two 1-year trials in patients with COPD. Mean peak and average FEV(1), mean trough FVC responses, and weekly mean morning and evening PEFR values were also increased to a greater extent with tiotropium than with ipratropium. In one of the two 6-month trials that compared the efficacy of tiotropium with that of inhaled salmeterol 50 micrograms twice daily, greater improvements from baseline in mean trough, peak, and average FEV(1) and FVC responses were seen with tiotropium than with salmeterol. Increases in weekly mean evening, but not morning, PEFR values were generally greater with tiotropium than salmeterol. In the second trial, improvement in the primary endpoint (mean trough FEV(1) response from baseline) with tiotropium or salmeterol was similar, although peak and average responses were superior with tiotropium. Preliminary results from a 6-week crossover study in patients with COPD suggested that tiotropium alone or in combination with once-daily formoterol improved mean trough and average FEV(1) and trough FVC values from baseline to a greater extent than twice-daily formoterol. More patients achieved a clinically important improvement (increase of >/=1 unit) in the transitional dyspnea index focal score (a measure of dyspnea-related impairment) with tiotropium than with placebo in the 1-year trials. Tiotropium was superior to ipratropium in 1-year trials, and was at least as effective as salmeterol in 6-month trials, in achieving a clinically important improvement in focal scores. Tiotropium recipients experienced fewer COPD exacerbations than placebo or ipratropium recipients and had fewer and shorter COPD-related hospitalizations compared with placebo recipients. Unlike salmeterol, tiotropium lengthened the time to onset of the first exacerbation and decreased the number of exacerbations compared with placebo in two 6-month trials. Similar proportions of tiotropium, salmeterol, and placebo recipients required COPD-related hospitalizations. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)     

Ipratropium bromide hydrofluoroalkane inhalation aerosol is safe and effective in patients with COPD

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of ipratropium bromide reformulated with the chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-free propellant hydrofluoroalkane (HFA)-134a (ipratropium bromide HFA) to that of the marketed ipratropium bromide inhalation aerosol (containing CFC) in patients with COPD. DESIGN: This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. The primary efficacy parameter was acute bronchodilator response. The primary end points were peak change in FEV(1) from baseline and area under the response-time curve. SETTING: Thirty-one clinical centers in the United States participated in this project. PATIENTS: A total of 507 patients with moderate-to-severe COPD were randomized, and 444 patients completed the trial. INTERVENTIONS: Twelve weeks of treatment four times daily with one of the following: ipratropium bromide HFA, 42 microg; ipratropium bromide HFA, 84 microg; HFA placebo; ipratropium bromide inhalation aerosol, 42 microg; or CFC placebo. Measurements and results: Patients in all active treatment groups had significant bronchodilator responses as shown by increases in mean FEV(1) from baseline of at least 15%. Bronchodilator response in all active treatment groups was also significantly more than their respective placebo treatments based on FEV(1), area under the time-response curve from 0 to 6 h, and peak response. FVC results were similar to those seen with FEV(1). There were no significant differences in adverse events, laboratory findings, or ECG findings among the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Ipratropium bromide HFA, 42 and mgr;g, provided bronchodilation comparable to the marketed ipratropium bromide CFC, 42 and mgr;g, over 12 weeks of regular use.     

An evaluation of salmeterol in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases

BACKGROUND: Salmeterol has been shown a useful drug for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, its positioning in the current treatment of COPD remains to be defined. The present study was carried out to evaluate its role as an add-on drug to the current first-line drug, ipratropium. METHODS: A double-blind randomized, parallel group, placebo-controlled design was used in an outpatient setting. Thirty-three patients with moderate or severe COPD were included. After a run-in period of two weeks on 40 microg four-times-daily ipratropium and 400 microg twice-daily beclomethasone dipropionate, they were randomized into two groups to receive either salmeterol (50 microg twice daily) or placebo for eight weeks. The outcome parameters were: (i) spirometry, (ii) six-minute walking test, (iii) SF-36 health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaire score, (iv) baseline dyspnoea index (BDI), (v) patient's self-assessment and (vi) supplemental use of salbutamol. RESULTS: The mean FEV1 and FVC increased significantly over the initial values in the salmeterol group but not in the placebo group. Salmeterol produced greater improvements in almost all the dimensions of HRQoL as well as in the BDI and the supplemental use of salbutamol was lower in this group. However, the six-minute walk distance was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that eight weeks treatment with salmeterol 50 microg twice-daily added to the existing regimen of ipratropium bromide and beclomethasone dipropionate provides greater symptomatic relief and improvement in lung function than placebo. This is accompanied by an improvement in the health-related quality of life.     

Onset of action of formoterol/budesonide in single inhaler vs. formoterol in patients with COPD

Formoterol is a beta(2)-agonist bronchodilator that combines a fast onset of action with a long duration of broncholytic effect. An increasing documentation is showing that the combination of a long acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist bronchodilator and an inhaled corticosteroid targets the airways obstruction in patients with COPD. In this study, we have explored whether the acute addition of an inhaled corticosteroid influences the fast bronchodilator response to formoterol. A total of 20 patients with stable COPD were randomized. Single doses of formoterol/budesonide 2 x (4.5/160)microg or formoterol 2 x 4.5 microg were given via Turbuhaler. Serial measurements of FEV(1) were performed over 60 min. Formoterol/budesonide elicited a significantly larger mean FEV(1)-AUC(0-15 min) than formoterol alone. Also the change in FEV(1) 15 min after inhalation of formoterol/budesonide combination (0.197 l; 95% CI: to 0.142-0.252) was greater than that induced by formoterol alone (0.147 l; 95% CI: to 0.092-0.201). The mean increases in FEV(1) were always higher after budesonide/formoterol than formoterol alone, although both treatments induced a significant improvement over baseline at each explored time point. Even the FEV(1)-AUC(0-60 min) after formoterol/budesonide was significantly larger than that after formoterol. Both treatments induced a significant reduction in VAS score but did not modify heart rate in a statistically significant manner. This study indicates that the addition of budesonide influences the fast onset of action of formoterol, but does not induce systemic effects, in patients with stable COPD.     

Formoterol Turbuhaler for as-needed therapy in patients with mild acute exacerbations of COPD.

Worsening of underlying bronchospasm may be associated with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). As airway obstruction becomes more severe, the therapeutic option is to add a short-acting inhaled beta2-agonist as needed to cause rapid relief of bronchospasm. Unfortunately however, the most effective dosage may increase above that recommended during acute exacerbations. Formoterol (Oxis) Turbuhaler has a rapid onset of action (within minutes) and demonstrates a maintained effect on a rway function. In this study, we examined the effects of formoterol used as needed in 20 patients with acute exacerbations of COPD. A dose response curve to inhaled formoterol (9 microg per inhalation) or placebo was constructed using three separate inhalations, i.e. a total cumulative dose of 27 microg. Dose increments were given at 20-min intervals, with measurements being made 15 min after each dose. Formoterol, but not placebo, induced a large and significant (P<0.001) dose-dependent increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) [mean differences from baseline = 0.1311 after 9 microg formoterol (95% CI: 0.096-0.167)] 0.1811 after 18 microg formoterol (95% CI: 0.140-0.2221) and 0.2081 after 27 microg formoterol (95% CI: 0.153-0.2631). However, 27 microg formoterol did not induce further benefit [0.0271 (95% CI: -0.008-0.0621); P=0.121] when compared wth 18 microg formoterol. Results of this study suggest the use of higher than customary dose of formoterol for as-needed therapy to provide rapid relief of bronchospasm in patients suffering from acute exacerbations of partially reversible COPD.     

Use of a long-acting inhaled beta2-adrenergic agonist, salmeterol xinafoate, in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a condition in which continuous bronchodilation may have clinical advantages. This study evaluated salmeterol, a beta-agonist bronchodilator with a duration of action substantially longer than that of short-acting beta-agonists, compared with ipratropium, an anticholinergic bronchodilator, and placebo in patients with COPD. Four hundred and five patients with COPD received either salmeterol 42 microg twice daily, ipratropium bromide 36 microg four times daily, or placebo for 12 wk in this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. Patients were stratified on the basis of bronchodilator response to albuterol (> 12% and > 200-ml improvement) and were randomized within each stratum. Bronchodilator response was measured over 12 h four times during the treatment period. Salmeterol provided similar maximal bronchodilatation to ipratropium but had a longer duration of action and a more constant bronchodilatory effect with no evidence of bronchodilator tolerance. Both active treatments were well tolerated. Salmeterol was an effective bronchodilator with a consistent effect over this 12-wk study in patients with COPD, including those "unresponsive" to albuterol. The long duration of action of salmeterol offers the advantage of twice daily dosing compared with the required four times a day dosing with ipratropium.