Cost-effective and safe ambulatory long-term immunoprophylaxis with intramuscular instead of intravenous hepatitis B immunoglobulin to prevent reinfection after orthotopic liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B (HBV)-infected patients receive an anti-HBs immunoprophylaxis [hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) titre of more than 100 IU/L] in combination with lamivudine to prevent reinfection after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). In comparison with intramuscular (i.m.) HBIG, costs for intravenous (i.v.) HBIG are found to be extremely high. We therefore studied patients' outcome (i) after a switch from i.v. to i.m. HBIG and (ii) the outcome after the patients were initially treated with i.m. HBIG after discharge from the hospital. METHODS: (i) Six outpatients were switched from 2000 IU i.v. HBIG (Hepatect) administered every 2 wk to 2000 IU i.m. HBIG (Hepatitis-B-Immunoglobulin Behring) given once a month. (ii) Six other outpatients were directly treated with i.m. HBIG every 4 wk after OLT. All patients also received 100 mg lamivudine/d. RESULTS: Patients switched from i.v. to i.m. HBIG had stable anti-HBs titres (i.v. HBIG: 180 +/- 37 IU/L vs. i.m. HBIG: 173 +/- 23 IU/L). Patients directly treated with i.m. HBIG also had sufficient anti-HBs titres (176 +/- 31 IU/L). Intramuscular application of HBIG was well tolerated by all patients and no side-effects were observed in patients receiving i.m. HBIG. In comparison with the protocol using i.v. HBIG, the costs of i.m. treatment were 60% lower. CONCLUSION: Long-term administration of i.m. HBIG saves up to 60% of the usual costs for i.v. prophylaxis of HBV reinfection in patients after OLT. In combination with lamivudine, long-term i.m. HBIG therapy is as efficient as i.v. HBIG treatment, but its lower costs clearly favour its use in preventing HBV reinfection after OLT.     

肝移植术后乙型肝炎复发的预防和治疗

目的探讨拉米夫定联合低剂量乙型肝炎（乙肝）免疫球蛋白（HBIG）预防肝移植术后乙肝复发的效果及乙肝复发后的治疗。方法对2000年12月至2003年5月因乙肝相关性终末期肝病和（或）合并肝细胞癌于我院接受肝移植手术并经随访的11例患者进行回顾性分析。所有患者均接受拉米夫定联合低剂量HBIG预防乙肝复发方案。观察术后近期乙肝转阴情况、术后较远期乙肝复发情况以及乙肝复发后的治疗情况。结果（1）所有患者HBsAg、HBeAg、HBV-DNA均于术后1-4d转为阴性,术后1周所有患者对HBIG均有反应,HBsAb滴度水平逐渐上升;（2）所有患者于观察期内生存情况均良好,对患者HBsAb滴度水平定期进行监测结果示大部分患者HBsAb滴度水平与预期治疗水平基本符合;（3）1例患者于术后25个月乙肝复发,通过改用阿德弗韦并加大HBIG用量,基本得到控制。结论拉米夫定联合低剂量HBIG预防肝移植后乙肝复发疗效确切,而且可显著降低治疗费用。     

Hepatitis B virus vaccine switch program for prevention of de novo hepatitis B virus infection in pediatric patients.

The principal objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of Hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine switch program after 1-year Hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) for the prevention of de novo HBV (DNHBV) infection in pediatric recipients of hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc)-positive grafts. In this study, we enrolled pediatric recipients (n = 14), who had undergone living donor liver transplantation with anti-HBc-positive grafts between July 2000 and July 2005 and were followed up for over 24 months after transplantation. HBIG was given daily during the first week and intermittently in order to maintain anti-hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) titers greater than 200 IU/l until 12 months post-transplantation. Then the HBV vaccine was given intermittently as a substitute for HBIG when anti-HBs titer fell below 200 IU/l. The median follow-up duration after vaccination was 26.5 months, and a median of 2.03 doses of vaccine per year was required for the maintenance of anti-HBs titers greater than at least 100 IU/l. Two of the patients did not start the HBV vaccine due to sustained high anti-HBs titer. Eleven completed the HBV switch, whereas 1 was ongoing. With the HBV vaccine switch program, anti-HBs titers greater than 100 IU/l could be maintained conveniently and effectively.     

Liver transplantation for chronic hepatitis B infection with the use of combination lamivudine and low-dose hepatitis B immune globulin.

Current protocols for prophylaxis against allograft reinfection after liver transplantation for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection include the administration of large doses of hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG), with considerable associated economic costs. Monotherapeutic prophylaxis with lamivudine has been complicated by the development of resistant strains of HBV. We studied the effectiveness of a posttransplantation prophylaxis protocol using combination lamivudine and low-dose HBIG in 7 consecutive patients with chronic HBV infection, 4 of whom were serum HBV DNA positive before pretransplantation lamivudine therapy. All patients were serum HBV DNA negative at transplantation and received lamivudine, 100 mg/d, posttransplantation. HBIG, 2170 IU, was administered intramuscularly intraoperatively and daily for 14 days. Maintenance HBIG therapy consisted of 2170 IU intramuscularly twice weekly, tapered to every 2 to 4 weeks by 12 months posttransplantation. Target serum HBIG (HBV surface antibody) titers were less than 500 IU/L for 6 months, then greater than 300 IU/L until 12 months posttransplantation. Induction serum HBIG titers were determined daily in 5 patients, and both serum HBIG and hepatitis B surface antigen were determined every 4 weeks in all patients. One patient died 61 days posttransplantation; the surviving patients (n = 6) were followed up for a mean of 532 days (range, 395 to 648 days). No patient has developed allograft reinfection. In the induction period, a target HBIG titer of greater than 500 IU/L was not achieved until a mean of 6.8 days (range, 5 to 10 days). In the maintenance period, all patients achieved the target HBIG titer. This suggests combination lamivudine and low-dose HBIG is effective in preventing allograft reinfection by HBV.     

A study of the pharmacokinetic profile of low-dose hepatitis B immune globulin in long-term liver transplant recipients for chronic hepatitis B infection.

Post-transplant protocols for hepatitis B (HBV) prophylaxis using high-dose intravenous hepatitis B immune globulin (10,000 IU) with or without lamivudine are commonly reported. Our centre has previously reported a low-dose intramuscular (i.m.) protocol and lamivudine with excellent results. There have been, however, no pharmacokinetic studies of i.m. hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) in this setting. The objective of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetic profile of i.m. HBIG in long-term post-liver-transplant recipients to determine a rational dosing protocol. Six stable liver transplant recipients receiving monthly i.m. HBIG injections for greater than one year were enrolled in this study. All patients had no detectable HBV DNA levels. HBIG titers (anti-HBs) were measured predose, then three times weekly for four weeks and then twice weekly until the serum HBIG titers were 100 IU/L or less. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using noncompartment methods. The mean time to maximum concentration was 10.5 d (range 4-20 d) and the mean half-life was 20 d (range 13.5-23.5 d). Based on these pharmacokinetic parameters in stable long-term post-transplant patients, a rational dosing protocol was developed that allows for more appropriate utility of HBIG and improved patient convenience.     

Safety and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Hepatitis B Immunoglobulin After Liver Transplantation: An Open Single‐Arm Prospective Study

Life‐long hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) administration is a main component of prophylactic strategy to prevent hepatitis B virus (HBV) reinfection after liver transplantation (LT). Long‐term effects of HBIG treatment are known only for intravenous (IV) and intramuscular formulations. To evaluate safety and efficacy of self‐administered SC HBIG, 135 LT patients receiving a 48‐week treatment were analyzed. The dose of HBIG was 500 IU or 1000 IU if body weight was <75 kg or ≥75 kg, respectively. Patients were switched from the monthly IV HBIG treatment to weekly SC HBIG 2–3 weeks after the last IV dosage. All patients were able to SC self‐injection after a single training. The treatment was effective in maintaining trough anti‐HBs levels >100 IU/L. No severe drug‐related side effects occurred. Fifteen injection‐site small hematomas and four cases of mild itch occurred. At the end of the study, anti‐HBs median titer was 232 IU/L (115–566 IU/L) and 97.8% of patients had an anti‐HBs level >150 IU/L. Due to high mean level of anti‐HBs titers observed during this study, individualized treatment schedules should be further investigated. In conclusion, SC HBIG for long‐term prophylaxis of post‐LT HBV reinfection resulted safe, well accepted, and effective in maintaining adequate anti‐HBs levels.     

Prophylactic use of low-dose, on-demand, intramuscular hepatitis B immunoglobulin and lamivudine after liver transplantation

The combination of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and antivirals (nucleos[t]ide analogs) has extended the applicability of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related liver disease. However, HBIG administrations have an extremely high cost. Herein, we evaluated our results with low-dose, on-demand, intramuscular HBIG plus lamivudine (LAM) prophylaxis after OLT. The HBV DNA status in 40 patients at the time of OLT determined the treatment: group A (n = 22), HBV DNA (-), no antiviral pretreatment; group B (n = 11), HBV DNA (-), after LAM; group C (n = 3), HBV DNA (+) after LAM (LAM resistance/Adefovir [ADV] unavailable); group D (n = 2), HBV DNA (+), no antiviral pretreatment; and group E (n = 2), HBV DNA (-) after LAM + ADV (LAM resistance/ADV available). Five patients died within 12 months after OLT unrelated to HBV infection. The remaining 35 patients were followed for a median duration of 16 months (range, 6-93 months). Only two recipients from group C, who were transplanted despite LAM resistance + no ADV pretreatment, revealed recurrent HBV infections at 14 and 16 months posttransplantation; they were then treated successfully with ADV as it became available. The third group C recipient had undetectable HBV DNA at 18 months after OLT. The mean cumulative doses of HBIG administered within the first, second, and third years were 34,014, 5258, and 5090 IU, respectively. In conclusion, low-dose, on-demand, intramuscular HBIG plus (LAM +/- ADV) prophylaxis is a safe, efficient, and cost-effective regimen to prevent recurrent HBV infection following OLT. OLT despite untreated LAM resistance may require sustained higher serum HBsAb levels after surgery.     

Immunization with an adjuvant hepatitis B vaccine in liver transplant recipients: antibody decline and booster vaccination with conventional vaccine.

Patients after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) due to hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related disease are at risk of endogenous hepatitis B reinfection and may receive life long prophylaxis with hepatitis B hyperimmunoglobulin (HBIG). In a previous study 16 of 20 OLT patients were immunized successfully with an adjuvant hepatitis B vaccine. To maintain protective antibody levels under immunosuppressive therapy, 11 of these patients were revaccinated with a double dosed conventional hepatitis B vaccine. Median interval between last vaccination and booster was 24 months (range 22-31 months). Antibody titres against hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) were monitored at the day of booster vaccination (day 0), at day 7 and day 28. At day 0, all vaccinees but one had anti-HBs titres greater than 500 IU/L (median 1,925 IU/L, range 196-7,612 IU/L). Maximum antibody titres after previous vaccination declined by a median of 82% (range 47-96%). After booster vaccination the anti-HBs titre increased significantly by a median factor of 2.42 (P<0.05). In conclusion, the majority of liver transplant recipients who previously had responded to adjuvant hepatitis B vaccine exhibited sufficient immunocompetence to produce a substantial antibody response after booster immunization with a conventional vaccine.     

Intramuscular hepatitis B immune globulin combined with lamivudine for prophylaxis against hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation.

Immunoprophylaxis using intravenous (IV) hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) decreases the recurrence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). However, IV HBIG is expensive, has significant side effects, and is inconvenient to administer. An alternative approach for prophylaxis using intramuscular (IM) HBIG and oral lamivudine was prospectively evaluated in this study. Ten consecutive patients with cirrhosis with HBV infection who underwent OLT were included in this study. Nine of 10 patients received lamivudine, 150 mg/d, for an average duration of 8.6 months before OLT. Two of 10 patients with detectable HBV DNA at the time of OLT received 10,000 U (45 mL) of IV HBIG daily for 7 consecutive days, followed by 5 mL of IM HBIG weekly for the next 3 weeks, then every 3 weeks. The other 8 patients were HBV DNA negative at OLT and received one dose of IV HBIG (45 mL) during surgery, followed by 5 mL of IM HBIG weekly for 4 weeks, then every 3 weeks. All patients received lamivudine, 150 mg/d, after OLT. During a mean follow-up of 15.6 months, 9 of 10 patients achieved a protective hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) titer greater than 200 IU/L and had no evidence of HBV recurrence. One patient failed to develop an adequate HBsAb titer and developed histological and virological evidence of recurrence. One patient died unrelated to HBV recurrence. Our preliminary data suggest that this combination prophylaxis with IM HBIG and lamivudine is effective and potentially cost saving.     

Subcutaneous administration of hepatitis B immune globulin in combination with lamivudine following orthotopic liver transplantation: effective prophylaxis against recurrence

Prophylaxis against recurrent hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection with hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG), in combination with antiviral agents such as lamivudine, has allowed transplantation for this condition to become feasible and accepted. Current protocols allow for HBIG administration either intravenously or intramuscularly. To date, there has been no reported experience with the subcutaneous route of post-transplant HBIG delivery. We report our experience of a 60-yr-old man for whom liver transplantation was performed for chronic HBV. HBIG was administered intramuscularly during the anhepatic phase of surgery. The finding of a portal vein thrombosis requiring repeated thrombectomy necessitated chronic anticoagulation. Post-operatively, HBIG was administered subcutaneously, in four separate injections, for a daily dose of 2170 IU along with continued lamivudine dosing. Hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) titres reached a serum concentration of >500 IU/L by seven d post-transplant and approximately 1000 IU/L by nine d post-transplant. Five months post-transplant, with continued combination of subcutaneous HBIG and lamivudine, there has been no recurrent HBV infection and anti-HBs titres have been at target levels. Our experience suggests that subcutaneous delivery of HBIG may be a feasible consideration when intramuscular/intravenous dosing is not possible.     

Failure of hepatitis B vaccination with conventional HBsAg vaccine in patients with continuous HBIG prophylaxis after liver transplantation.

Hepatitis B vaccination after liver transplantation for hepatitis B-related liver disease has been investigated as an alternative strategy to reinfection prophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) with conflicting results. In most studies, HBIG treatment was discontinued before vaccination. An outstanding good response was achieved with vaccination under continuous HBIG administration using hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-based vaccine containing special adjuvants. Both, adjuvants and continuous HBIG administration have been discussed as crucial factors for good response. Twenty-four patients were vaccinated with conventional double dose recombinant vaccine containing 40 microg HBsAg up to 12 times at weeks 0, 2, 4 (cycle 1), 12, 14, 16 (cycle 2), 24, 26, 28 (cycle 3), and 36, 38, 40 (cycle 4). All patients received 2,000 IU HBIG every 6 weeks (4 times intravenously and 4 times intramuscularly). A significant response was defined as reconfirmed increase of anti-HBs-antigen (anti-HBs) unexplained by HBIG administration or lack of anti-HBs decrease below 100 IU/L after discontinuation of HBIG treatment after week 48. Only 2 of 24 patients (8.3%) responded significantly. Anti-HBs started to increase after the seventh vaccination (cycle 3, during intramuscular HBIG administration) in 1 patient and after 12th vaccination (cycle 4, during intravenous HBIG administration) in the other. Maximum anti-HBs levels were >1,000 IU/L in both patients and decreased significantly slower as compared to passive prophylaxis during follow-up. In conclusion, the conventional HBsAg vaccine failed to induce a significant humoral immune response in most patients despite continued HBIG treatment. Further studies should address the question, of whether the use of potent adjuvant systems results in higher response rates.     

YMDD变异患者肝移植术后乙型肝炎病毒再感染的防治(附14例报告)

目的探讨YMDD变异受者肝移植术后乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)再感染的防治策略及效果。方法回顾性分析14例在肝移植前伴有YMDD变异的HBV感染相关疾病受者的临床资料,14例受者在接受肝移植后,使用小剂量肌内注射乙型肝炎人免疫球蛋白(HBIG)联合阿德福韦预防术后HBV再感染。结果14例YMDD变异患者平均随访43.2个月,2例死亡,均与HBV再感染无关;移植术后血清中HBsAg和HBV-DNA平均转阴时间为12 d(3～21 d);2例患者分别于术后11个月和22个月出现HBV再感染,排除停药干扰外,实际再感染率为7%(1/14),HBV再感染后经积极治疗HBV-DNA均转阴,肝功能正常,未见阿德福韦相关肾毒性。术前HBV-DNA≥1.0×106copies/ml者术后再感染率高于术前HBV-DNA1.0×106copies/ml者,但比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论小剂量HBIG联合阿德福韦可安全有效地预防YMDD变异患者肝移植术后HBV再感染。     

肝移植术后HBV再感染的治疗

目的分析肝移植术后乙型肝炎病毒（HBV）再感染患者的抗病毒治疗与乙肝病毒基因变异情况。方法317例HBV相关终末期肝病患者肝移植术后15例单独使用LAM，302例使用小剂量乙肝免疫球蛋白（hepatitis B immune globulin，HBIG）和拉米夫定（lamivudine，LAM）（或adefovir dipivoxil，ADV）联合预防HBV再感染，同时检测HBV血清标志物、血清HBV DNA、YMDD区变异、及肝活检组织乙型肝炎标记物。结果术后LAM组有4例术前HBV DNA阳性患者术后HBV再感染，LAM＋HBIG联合用药组16例HBV再感染，两组术后HBV再感染差异有统计学意义（26．7％VS．5．30％，P〈0．01）。317例患者术后12例发生YMDD变异，发生率为3．79％，再感染病例60％（12／20）。经加用ADV治疗后5例HBV DNA转阴性，4名患者HBV DNA滴度下降，肝功能显著改善，3例发生纤维淤胆性肝炎，2例死亡，1例经再次肝移植治愈。结论小剂量HBIG＋LAM可以有效地预防肝移植术后HBV再感染；在小剂量HBIG＋LAM用药基础上HBV再感染可能产生YMDD（tyrosine，methionine，aspartate，aspartate）变异；ADV可作为LAM耐药后用药，对于发生突破性感染的患者应采取以ADV为主的综合治疗。     

恩替卡韦预防肝移植术后HBV再感染的临床研究

目的评价恩替卡韦联合乙肝免疫球蛋白（HBIG）预防原位肝移植（OLT）术后HBV再感染的效果，探讨HBV复发高危患者的预防策略。方法对具有肝移植术后HBV再感染高危因素的患者，采用双向型的队列研究。试验组：前瞻性研究从2006年3月至2007年6月行同种异体原位肝移植术患者，术后长期使用恩替卡韦＋肌注型HBIG预防HBV再感染；对照组：回顾性分析2003年9月至2006年3月行同种异体原位肝移植术的患者，术后长期使用拉米夫定＋肌注型HBIG。两组患者观察截止~1]2008年3月，对HBVDNA定量水平、乙肝两对半、HBV再感染时间、累积再感染率进行统计学分析。结果试验组38例患者，随访时间（18．5±53）个月，未发现HBV再感染；对照组共116例患者，随访时间（20．2±9．8）个月，其中15例出现了HBV再感染，再感染率为12．9％，再感染时间为（18．9±8．7）个月，两组差异有统计学意义。对两组患者累积再感染率行Kaplan—Meier法分析提示两组患者累积再感染率曲线有统计学意义，试验组的累积再感染率低于对照组（0VS12．93％，P〈0．05）。结论对具有HBV再感染高危因素的患者，恩替卡韦联合HBIG与拉米夫定联合HBIG相比，有效地降低了肝移植术后HBV再感染率。     

Response to an experimental HBV vaccine permits withdrawal of HBIg prophylaxis in fulminant and selected chronic HBV-infected liver graft recipients.

Strategies using lamivudine and hepatitis B immunoglobulins (HBIg) for prevention of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reinfection after liver transplantation (LT) are expensive since life-long treatment is needed. We evaluated the possibility to obtain protective hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) antibody (anti-HBs) titers after LT and to discontinue HBIg prophylaxis after a reinforced course of vaccination against HBV using an experimental adjuvant HBsAg / AS04 vaccine (GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals [GSK], Rixensart, Belgium) in patients transplanted for hepatitis B. Fifteen LT patients on stable low-level immunosuppression were vaccinated with a double dose of the vaccine at 0, 1, 2, 6, and 12 months: 5 patients were transplanted for nonviral diseases and 10 patients were transplanted for HBV on HBIg monotherapy. HBIg were continued during baseline vaccination (0, 1, and 2 months) and when anti-HBs titers determined every 6 weeks dropped below 150 IU/L. Overall follow-up was 18 months. Sustained long-term response to vaccination was defined as anti-HBs titers >500 IU/L without further need for HBIg administration during a follow-up period of at least 12 months. Overall sustained response to vaccination was 53% (8 / 15 patients); 80% (4 / 5 patients) in the nonviral disease group and 40% (4 / 10 patients) in the HBV group (2 /2 fulminant and 2/8 chronically infected patients) developed a sustained long-term response and were completely free of HBIg at the end of the 18-month follow-up. No HBV recurrence, rejection episodes, or side effects occurred during the follow-up. In conclusion, protective anti-HBs titers were obtained in a substantial number of LT patients following a reinforced course of HBV vaccination with vaccines containing new immunostimulating adjuvants. Vaccination seems well tolerated and safe and allows long-term discontinuation of HBIg.     

An Efficacy and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Combination Hepatitis B Immune Globulin and Lamivudine to Prevent Recurrent Hepatitis B After Orthotopic Liver Transplantation Compared With Hepatitis B Immune Globulin Monotherapy

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection was limited until recently by poor graft and patient outcomes caused by recurrent HBV. Long-term immunoprophylaxis with hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) dramatically improved post-OLT survival, but recurrent HBV still occurred in up to 36% of the recipients. More recently, combination HBIG and lamivudine has been shown to effectively prevent HBV recurrence in patients post-OLT. The aim of the current study is to determine long-term outcome and cost-effectiveness of using combination HBIG and lamivudine compared with HBIG monotherapy in patients who undergo OLT for HBV. A retrospective chart review identified 59 patients administered combination HBIG and lamivudine and 12 patients administered HBIG monotherapy as primary prophylaxis against recurrent HBV. Lamivudine, 150 mg/d, was administered orally indefinitely. HBIG was administered under a standard protocol (10,000 IU intravenously during the anhepatic phase, then 10,000 IU/d intravenously for 7 days, then 10,000 IU intravenously monthly) indefinitely. A decision-analysis model was developed to evaluate the potential economic impact of prophylaxis against HBV with combination therapy compared with monotherapy. Recurrent HBV was defined as the reappearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) after its initial disappearance post-OLT. In the combination-therapy group, no patient redeveloped serum HBsAg or HBV DNA during mean follow-ups of 459 and 416 days, respectively. In the monotherapy group, 3 patients (25%) had reappearance of HBsAg in serum during a mean follow-up of 663 days. Combination therapy resulted in a dominant, cost-effective strategy with an average cost-effectiveness ratio of $252,111/recurrence prevented compared with $362,570/recurrence prevented in the monotherapy strategy. Combination prophylaxis with HBIG and lamivudine is highly effective in preventing recurrent HBV, may protect against the emergence of resistant mutants, and is significantly more cost-effective than HBIG monotherapy with its associated rate of recurrent HBV. (Liver Transpl 2000;6:741-748.)     

Lamivudine After Hepatitis B Immune Globulin Is Effective in Preventing Hepatitis B Recurrence After Liver Transplantation

The prevention of recurrent hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) with hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) is expensive and requires indefinite parenteral administration. Lamivudine is a nucleoside analogue capable of inhibiting HBV replication. The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy of lamivudine in the prevention of recurrent HBV infection after a course of HBIG in patients who were hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive and hepatitis Be antigen (HBeAg) negative before OLT. Patients at high risk for recurrent HBV infection (HBeAg positive and HBV DNA positive) were excluded. Thirty HBsAg-positive, HBeAg-negative patients underwent OLT from January 1993 to June 1997. All 30 patients were administered HBIG after OLT and, after 2 years, were given the option of continuing with HBIG or switching to lamivudine. Five patients were excluded: 3 patients were lost to follow-up and 2 patients died of technical complications. Three patients terminated HBIG therapy at 8, 24, and 29 months after OLT, and reinfection with HBV occurred in 1 patient. Six patients elected to continue HBIG therapy for life; 1 patient died of melanoma and the remaining 5 patients are HBsAg negative, with an average follow-up of 73 months. Sixteen patients were converted to lamivudine after a course of HBIG, and all 16 patients are HBsAg negative, with an average follow-up of 51 months after OLT. Five patients have been on lamivudine monotherapy for more than 24 months. These results suggest that lamivudine administered after a posttransplantation course of HBIG can effectively prevent the recurrence of HBV infection in patients who are HBsAg positive and HBeAg negative before OLT. (Liver Transpl 2000;6:434-439.)     

Prevention of HBV Recurrence After Liver Transplant: Long-Term Results

BackgroundAntiviral therapy with or without hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) is a common strategy for the prevention of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reinfection. But there is no consensus on management protocols, and long-term data are relatively rare on recurrence of HBV infection after liver transplantation using a nucleoside analogue and HBIG prophylaxis.MethodsWe performed 56 liver transplants since June 2006. Among them, 32 liver recipients had liver cirrhosis associated with HBV, 9 with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and 23 without HCC. Three operative mortalities, 3 deaths within 1 year related to infection, and 1 follow-up loss less than 1 year were excluded from analysis. We analyzed 25 liver transplants retrospectively. We prevented HBV reinfection with entecavir or tenofovir lifelong with 7 days of daily intravenous HBIG, 10,000 units, including operative day, and then once a week for the next 3 weeks, and then once a month for 1 year. Afterward, 4000 or 6000 units every 2 or 3 months were given to maintain patients’ serum hepatitis B antibody titer >200 mIU/mL.ResultsMean follow-up period for HBV reinfection was 120.3 months. No patients have had reinfection.ConclusionsLifelong HBIG and nucleoside is an excellent prevention strategy for HBV reinfection after liver transplant.     

Entecavir Combined With Short-term Hepatitis B Immunoglobulin in Preventing Hepatitis B Virus Recurrence in Liver Transplant Recipients

BackgroundThe combination of nucleoside analogs and long-term hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) is considered to be the standard regimen for preventing hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplant (LT). However, long-term use of HBIG causes many adverse effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of nucleoside analogs entecavir combined with short-term HBIG in preventing HBV recurrence after LT.MethodsThis retrospective study assessed the effect a combination of entecavir and short-term HBIG in prophylaxis of HBV recurrence among 56 LT recipients who had undergone the procedure because of HBV-associated liver disease at our center between December 2017 and December 2021. All patients received entecavir treatment combined with HBIG for the prevention of hepatitis B recurrence, and HBIG treatment was withdrawn within 1 month. The patients were followed up to determine levels of hepatitis B surface antigen, antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAb), and HBV-DNA and the recurrence rate of HBV.ResultsOnly 1 patient appeared positive for hepatitis B surface antigen at 2 months post-LT. The overall HBV recurrence rate was 1.8%. The HBsAb titers of all patients gradually decreased over time, with a median of 376.6 IU/L at 1 month post-LT and a median of 13.47 IU/L at 12 months post-LT. During the follow-up period, the HBsAb titer of the preoperative HBV-DNA–positive patients remained at a lower level than that of HBV-DNA–negative patients.ConclusionsEntecavir combined with short-term HBIG can exert a good effect for the prevention of HBV reinfection post-LT.     

Low-dose intramuscular hepatitis B immune globulin and lamivudine for long-term prophylaxis of hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation

The combination of lamivudine and hepatitis B immunoglobulins (HBIg) to prevent recurrence of HBV hepatitis has significantly improved the survival of patients transplanted for HBV-related end-stage liver disease. Generally, HBIg are administered intravenously. We evaluated the efficacy, tolerability, and cost savings of long-term intramuscular HBIg and lamivudine in 28 patients (23 men and 5 women), who received liver transplants for acute or chronic HBV-related liver disease. Twelve patients started lamivudine before and 16 at the time of liver transplantation. HBIg were administered intravenously during the first week (50 to 70,000 IU) and intramuscularly thereafter (1200 IU every 3 to 6 weeks) to maintain an HbsAb titer >100 IU/L. Mean follow-up was 20 +/- 13 months. Only one patient experienced HBV recurrence (9 months after transplantation). This patient had failed to follow the scheduled prophylaxis. Cumulative survival at 3 years was 83%. Intramuscular HBIg were well tolerated in all cases. Cost analysis comparing intramuscular vs intravenous HBIg administration showed that 39,490 Euros were saved per patient per year. These preliminary results show that low-dose intramuscular HBIg and lamivudine are efficacious and cost-effective for long-term prophylaxis of hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation.