Pharmacotherapy of borderline outpatients

The charts of 50 outpatients meeting both Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines (DIB) and DSM-III criteria for Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD), 29 outpatients meeting DSM-III criteria for Antisocial Personality Disorder (APD), and 26 outpatients meeting DSM-III criteria for Dysthymic Disorder, as well as DSM-III criteria for some other type of Axis II disorder (dysthymic other personality disorder [OPD]) were reviewed blind to proband diagnosis to determine both the percentage of those in each group who had adequate medication trials and the efficacy of those trials. Borderlines were significantly more likely than antisocial controls to have received an adequate trial of some form of medication. They were also significantly more likely than antisocial controls to have received an adequate trial of anxiolytics and antidepressants. However, they were distinguished at the trend level or better from both antisocial and dysthymic OPD controls by their greater likelihood of having received an adequate trial of neuroleptics, lithium, and polypharmacy. The percentage of adequately treated borderlines who experienced some degree of symptom relief was not significantly different than that found in either control group. However, adequately treated borderlines were significantly less likely than adequately treated dysthymic OPD controls to have had a definite response to pharmacotherapy (i.e., shown marked improvement of target symptoms).     

Childhood experiences of borderline patients

The childhood histories of 50 outpatients meeting both Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines (DIB) and DSM-III criteria for Borderline Personality Disorder, 29 outpatients meeting DSM-III criteria for Antisocial Personality Disorder, and 26 outpatients meeting DSM-III for Dysthymic Disorder as well as DSM-III criteria for some other type of Axis II disorder were assessed, blind to proband diagnosis, using a semistructured interview. Borderlines were significantly more likely than those in either control group to report a history of abuse, particularly verbal and sexual abuse. They were also significantly more likely than antisocial controls to report a history of neglect, particularly emotional withdrawal, and significantly more likely than dysthymic other personality disorder controls to report a history of early separation experiences. The authors conclude that the development of Borderline Personality Disorder is more strongly associated with (1) exposure to chronically disturbed caretakers than prolonged separations from these same adults and (2) a history of abuse than a history of neglect.     

Mothers of boys with gender identity disorder: a comparison of matched controls

This pilot study compared mothers of boys with gender identity disorder (GID) with mothers of normal boys to determine whether differences in psychopathology and child-rearing attitudes and practices could be identified. Results of the Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines and the Beck Depression Inventory revealed that mothers of boys with GID had more symptoms of depression and more often met the criteria for Borderline Personality Disorder than the controls. Fifty-three percent of the mothers of boys with GID compared with only 6% of controls met the diagnosis for Borderline Personality Disorder on the Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines or had symptoms of depression on the Beck Depression Inventory. Results of the Summers and Walsh Symbiosis Scale suggested that mothers of probands had child-rearing attitudes and practices that encouraged symbiosis and discouraged the development of autonomy.     

The validity of DSM-III borderline personality disorder. A phenomenologic, family history, treatment response, and long-term follow-up study

To test the validity of the DSM-III diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD), we examined the phenomenology, family history, treatment response, and four-to-seven-year long-term outcome of a cohort of 33 patients meeting DSM-III criteria for BPD. We found that (1) BPD could be distinguished readily from DSM-III schizophrenia; (2) BPD did not appear to represent "borderline affective disorder," although many patients displayed BPD and major affective disorder concomitantly; and (3) BPD could not be distinguished on any of the indices from histrionic and antisocial personality disorders.     

Retrospective and prospective design and data

The study of the presentation, symptomatology and family characteristics of an exclusively adolescent sample of patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) was undertaken. Twenty-four cases of borderline personality disorder, 20 females, 4 males, identified using chart review and meeting the criteria of the Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines (DIB) and DSM III-R, were matched with psychiatric controls. Adolescents with borderline personality disorder were found to have high rates of affective symptomatology with Axis I diagnosis of major depressive disorder - MDD (DSM-III-R), and high rates of interpersonal psychopathology, i.e., manipulation, devaluation, and a pervasive sense of boredom. The latter seem to be characteristic as for adults with borderline personality disorder. The families were particularly angry and volatile.     

Diagnosing personality disorders in psychiatric inpatients

This study investigated assumptions made by DSM-III and DSM-III-R regarding Axis I-Axis II associations and sex differences for the 11 personality disorders (PD). A total of 112 patients formed 4 Axis I diagnostic groups: recent-onset schizophrenia (n = 35); recent-onset mania (n = 26); unipolar affective disorder (n = 30); and a mixed diagnostic group (n = 21). The prevalence of PD was determined using the Structured Interview for DSM-III Personality Disorders (SIDP). Schizophrenia was associated with antisocial PD and schizotypal PD; manic disorder was associated with histrionic PD; and unipolar affective disorder was associated with borderline, dependent and avoidant PD. Some of these results were consistent with DSM-III/DSM-III-R postulates. However, there was little support for the DSM-III/DSM-III-R statements on sex differences in the prevalence of PD, except for antisocial PD. The implications of the results for DSM-III/DSM-III-R assumptions are discussed.     

Discriminant efficiency of antisocial and borderline personality disorder criteria in Hispanic men with substance use disorders

The authors examined the discriminant efficiency of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition ( DSM-IV ) criteria for borderline personality disorder (BPD) and antisocial personality disorder (APD). Subjects were 74 men admitted to an outpatient substance abuse program for monolingual Hispanic adults. All were reliably assessed with the Spanish-language version of the Diagnostic Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders. Conditional probabilities were calculated to determine the diagnostic efficiency and discriminant efficiency of BPD and APD symptoms. Twenty-five (34%) subjects met diagnostic criteria for BPD, and 16 (22%) met criteria for APD. The diagnostic co-occurrence of these disorders was statistically significant. Whereas the diagnostic efficiency of the BPD criterion set was comparable to that reported in other clinical studies, these criteria were not significantly more efficient in diagnosing BPD than APD. By contrast, the APD criteria were more efficient in diagnosing APD than BPD; this was true for both the "adult" and the "conduct disorder" APD criterion subsets. In male Hispanic outpatients with substance use disorders, BPD and APD show significant diagnostic overlap. The APD criteria are useful in discriminating these 2 disorders, whereas the BPD criteria are not. These findings have implications for the discriminant validity of the BPD and APD criteria and support the value of the conduct disorder criteria in predicting APD in adulthood.     

Relationship of borderline symptoms to histories of abuse and neglect: A pilot study

Axis II diagnoses of 50 applicants for long-term inpatient treatment were obtained using the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire, Revised. Clinical records were coded for evidence of a history of childhood abuse or neglect. Seventy-five percent of patients with a diagnosis of Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) had histories of some type of abuse, compared with 33 percent of the nonborderline patients. A principal components analysis of the eight DSM-III-R criteria for BPD and histories of abuse and neglect showed that abuse history is correlated with the criteria of unstable relationships, feelings of emptiness, and abandonment fears, whereas neglect history is correlated with suicidal behavior. Affective instability, intense anger, and identity disturbance were uncorrelated with abuse or neglect. Thus, the affective symptoms of BPD appear to be unrelated to aversive childhood events, consistent with the concept of a subtype of BPD dominated by affective dysregulation.     

Affective lability in bipolar disorder and borderline personality disorder

BackgroundThe boundaries between the affective instability in bipolar disorder and borderline personality disorder have not been clearly defined. Using self-report measures, previous research has suggested that the affective lability of patients with bipolar disorder and borderline personality disorder may have different characteristics.MethodsWe assessed the mood states of 29 subjects meeting Revised Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria for BPD and 25 subjects meeting DSM-IV criteria for bipolar II disorder or cyclothymia using the Affective Lability Scale (ALS), the Affect Intensity Measure (AIM), and a newly developed clinician-administered instrument, the Affective Lability Interview for Borderline Personality Disorder (ALI-BPD). The ALI-BPD measures frequency and intensity of shifts in 8 affective dimensions. Subjects in the borderline group could not meet criteria for bipolar disorder; subjects in the bipolar/cyclothymia group could not meet criteria for BPD.ResultsPatients in the bipolar group had significantly higher scores on the euthymia–elation subscale of the ALS; patients in the BPD group had significantly higher scores on the anxiety–depression subscale of the ALS. Patients with bipolar disorder had significantly higher total AIM scores and significantly higher score on the AIM positive emotion subscale. In terms of frequency, patients in the borderline group reported the following: (1) significantly less frequent affective shifts between euthymia–elation and depression–elation on the ALI-BPD and (2) significantly more frequent shifts between euthymia–anger, anxiety–depression, and depression–anxiety. In terms of intensity, borderline patients reported the following: (1) significantly less intense shifts between euthymia–elation and depression–elation on the ALI-BPD and (2) significantly more intense shifts between euthymia–anxiety, euthymia–anger, anxiety–depression, and depression–anxiety.ConclusionThe affective lability of patients with borderline and bipolar II/cyclothymic can be differentiated with respect to frequency and intensity using both self-report and clinician-administered measures.     

Lifetime prevalence of specific mental disorders among people born in Iceland in 1931

The lifetime prevalence rates are presented for mental disorders in a random sample of people born in Iceland in 1931, interviewed at the age of 55-57 years. The diagnoses are made according to DSM-III, on the basis of the National Institute of Mental Health's diagnostic Interview Schedule (NIMH-DIS) used by trained lay interviewers. The most common diagnoses were alcohol abuse and dependence, generalized anxiety disorder, phobic disorders, dysthymic disorder and major depressive episode. Disorders more common in men were antisocial personality, alcohol abuse and alcohol dependence. Disorders more common among women were major depressive episode and generalized anxiety disorder. Alcohol abuse was more prevalent among those living in rural areas, but dependence was more prevalent in the urban area, where panic disorder is also more frequent. Widowed, separated and divorced people had most of the highest prevalences: tobacco-use disorder, alcohol abuse and dependence, dysthymia and generalized anxiety disorder. Except for a very high rate of alcohol abuse and dependence and a low rate of substance abuse disorders, the prevalence rates are similar to those obtained in North American studies using the NIMH-DIS as a survey instrument. The DSM-III criteria for alcohol abuse or dependence may be less applicable to Iceland than to North America, because of differences in what is culturally regarded as acceptable use of alcohol.     

Prognostic validity of self-report and interview measures of personality disorder in depressed inpatients

Presence of personality disorders was assessed with the Structured Interview for the DSM-III Personality Disorders (SIDP) in a series of 78 nonpsychotic inpatients with major depression. Measures of severity of depression were administered at admission, at discharge, and 6 months after admission. Outcome for the depression was especially poor in patients meeting criteria for multiple personality disorders from multiple DSM-III clusters. A subgroup of 38 patients received both the SIDP interview and a self-report measure of personality disorder, the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire. Depressed inpatients who met more than the median number of personality disorder criteria by either measure were approximately half as likely to show improvement at discharge and at 6-month follow-up than were patients with less than the median number of criteria.     

DSM-III symptom disorders (Axis I) and personality disorders (Axis II) in an outpatient population

Type and prevalence of Axis I and Axis II disorders (DSM-III) were assessed in a sample of 298 consecutive psychiatric outpatients. The instruments used were SCID and SIDP. About half of the Axis I diagnoses consisted of different subgroups of depression. Most patients had more than one diagnosis, anxiety being the second most common disorder. Eighty one percent of the subjects met the criteria for a personality disorder diagnosis; half of them obtained more than one Axis II diagnosis. Personality disorder was more common among men than among women. Avoidant and dependent personality disorders constituted the most frequent diagnoses.     

Affective disorder in juvenile offenders: A preliminary study

OBJECTIVE: The authors' goal was to determine the prevalence of major mental disorders and substance abuse in adolescents admitted to a juvenile detention center. METHOD: As part of a routine mental health screening, modules from the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children were administered to 50 youths (11-17 years old) at an urban juvenile detention center. RESULTS: A high rate of affective disorder (42%) was found among these adolescents: 10 (20%) met criteria for mania, another 10 met criteria for major depressive disorder, and one met criteria for bipolar disorder, mixed type. Thirty (60%) met criteria for conduct disorder, and very high rates of alcohol, marijuana, and other substance dependence were found. There was a strong association between affective disorder and conduct disorder; adolescents with mania had much higher rates of reported abuse of substances other than alcohol or marijuana. CONCLUSIONS: Juvenile offenders have high rates of affective disorder. Further studies are needed to examine the relationship of affective disorder to substance abuse as well as to antisocial behavior.     

Personality and personality disorders among patients with major depression in combination with dysthymic or cyclothymic disorders

Personality traits and personality disorders in 298 consecutive outpatients with pure major depression, major depression with dysthymic or cyclothymic disorder, pure dysthymic or cyclothymic disorder and other disorders were investigated. Patients with dysthymic or cyclothymic disorders alone or in combination with major depression showed more self-doubt, insecurity, sensitivity, compliance, rigidity and emotional instability. They were more schizoid, schizotypal, borderline and avoidant according to MCMI and had a higher prevalence of DSM-III Axis II diagnoses, and more borderline, avoidant, and passive-aggressive personality disorders, as measured by SIDP. All in all, dramatic and anxious clusters of personality disorders were more frequent among patients with dysthymic-cyclothymic disorders in addition to major depression than among patients with major depression only. The findings elucidated the close connection between the more chronic affective disorders and the personality disorders, irrespective of any concomitant diagnosis of major depression.     

DSM-III personality disorder diagnoses in a nonpatient sample. Demographic correlates and comorbidity

Seven hundred ninety-seven first-degree relatives of normal controls and patients with a variety of psychiatric disorders were interviewed with the Diagnostic Interview Schedule and the Structured Interview for DSM-III Personality Disorders. Slightly more than one sixth of the sample received a personality disorder (PD) diagnosis, and of those with a PD, almost one fourth had more than one. The most prevalent diagnoses were mixed, passive-aggressive, antisocial, histrionic, and schizotypal PD. The demographic correlates and frequency of Axis I disorders in individuals with each specific PD were examined, and all but histrionic and passive-aggressive PDs had distinctive profiles.     

Associated diagnoses (comorbidity) in patients with borderline personality disorder

The authors administered the Diagnostic Interview Schedule to 21 patients with borderline personality disorder. The patients met criteria for various other DSM-III diagnoses, meeting exclusion criteria in some cases, and not in other cases. Frequency distribution of each diagnosis and the diagnoses of each individual patient, are presented. Affective disorder was the most common diagnosis (85%). Of these, 62% had primary major depression, and 23% had secondary depression. Other diagnoses include bipolar disorder, dysthymia, panic, agoraphobia, alcohol and Drug abuse, somatization disorder, and many others. The authors conclude that while borderline disorder may be a sub-affective disorder, a specific diagnostic profile for this disorder that accounts for the presence of other Axis I and Axis II syndromes has yet to be delineated.     

Differences between older and younger adults with Borderline Personality Disorder on clinical presentation and impairment

Background

Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is well-known to be a clinically severe and impairing diagnosis. Research shows that BPD symptoms decrease in severity over time. However, a subset of patients with BPD continue to meet criteria for the disorder in older adulthood. Little is known about this subset. Perception of BPD as a young-person's diagnosis could lead to under recognition in older patients. As such, the objective of the present report is to provide the first direct comparison between older and younger adults with BPD on demographics, clinical presentation, and functional impairment.

Method

Over 3000 psychiatric outpatients were evaluated with semi-structured diagnostic interviews. Forty-six older adults (age 45–68) and 97 younger adults (age 18–25) met criteria for BPD.

Results

Both groups reported high levels of functional impairment and Axis I comorbidity. Older adults were more likely to endorse chronic emptiness, and less likely to endorse impulsivity, self-harm, and affective instability. Older adults also reported fewer substance use disorders, more lifetime hospitalizations and higher social impairment.

Conclusion

Older adults with BPD had a significantly different clinical presentation from younger adults with BPD, including differences in likelihood of endorsing specific BPD criteria, social impairment, and comorbid substance use. It is important to assess less prototypic features of BPD to avoid overlooking borderline personality features in this population.     

Personality disorders in parasuicide

To examine the prevalence of personality disorders in a representative sample of patients admitted to inpatient care after a parasuicide, 64 consecutive patients were investigated with structured interviews for DSM-IV personality disorders and clinical interviews for Axis I disorders and suicidal behaviour. We found a borderline personality disorder (BPD) as principal diagnosis in 55% of the subjects and some other personality disorder (OPD) in an additional 23%. Multiple Axis II disorders were significantly more common in the BPD group, in which 71% met criteria for three or more personality disorders, compared with 7% in the OPD group. In the BPD group 20% did not have a concomitant Axis I disorder, whereas this was very uncommon in the other groups. A relatively large proportion (34%) in the BPD group used other parasuicide methods than drug intoxication, whereas in the other groups this was rare. The mean number of previous parasuicidal acts was significantly higher in the BPD group, in which 57% had three or more previous parasuicides, and a high proportion (60%) also had repeated a parasuicidal act within the last year. In the BPD group 69% had ongoing outpatient treatment. Only 25% of these outpatients had a borderline personality disorder reported in the hospital records, suggesting that the personality disorder might go undiagnosed. The study gives support to the importance of a focused and structured personality disorder diagnosis in customizing treatment for the person with a recent parasuicide.     

Personality disorders in parasuicide

To examine the prevalence of personality disorders in a representative sample of patients admitted to inpatient care after a parasuicide, 64 consecutive patients were investigated with structured interviews for DSM-IV personality disorders and clinical interviews for Axis I disorders and suicidal behaviour. We found a borderline personality disorder (BPD) as principal diagnosis in 55% of the subjects and some other personality disorder (OPD) in an additional 23%. Multiple Axis II disorders were significantly more common in the BPD group, in which 71% met criteria for three or more personality disorders, compared with 7% in the OPD group. In the BPD group 20% did not have a concomitant Axis I disorder, whereas this was very uncommon in the other groups. A relatively large proportion (34%) in the BPD group used other parasuicide methods than drug intoxication, whereas in the other groups this was rare. The mean number of previous parasuicidal acts was significantly higher in the BPD group, in which 57% had three or more previous parasuicides, and a high proportion (60%) also had repeated a parasuicidal act within the last year. In the BPD group 69% had ongoing outpatient treatment. Only 25% of these outpatients had a borderline personality disorder reported in the hospital records, suggesting that the personality disorder might go undiagnosed. The study gives support to the importance of a focused and structured personality disorder diagnosis in customizing treatment for the person with a recent parasuicide.     

Structured interviews for borderline personality disorder

The authors compared three instruments used to diagnose borderline personality disorder--the Diagnostic Interview for Borderline Patients (DIB), the Schedule for Interviewing Borderlines, and the Structured Interview for DSM-III Personality Disorders--in 56 patients with personality disorders. A borderline diagnosis was made according to the DIB in 30%, the Structured Interview for DSM-III Personality Disorders in 48%, and the Schedule for Interviewing Borderlines in 55% of the patients. Diagnostic agreement was only 52%, which has implications for the generalizability of results of validation studies of the borderline diagnosis. Improvement in diagnostic agreement requires modification of current criteria sets and/or the use of dimensional models.