Histopathology of familial ovarian tumors in women from families with and without germline BRCA1 mutations

Breast cancers from patients with germline BRCA1 mutations show characteristic histopathologic features. However, similar studies of BRCA1-associated ovarian cancers have reported inconsistent findings. Interobserver differences in histopathologic classification are a significant source of variation, and most studies have obtained histopathologic information from pathology reports rather than from review of histopathology slides. We therefore reviewed the histopathology slides and pathology reports to determine histologic type, grade, and stage for cancers of the ovary or peritoneum in 217 women from 126 families enrolled in the Gilda Radner Familial Ovarian Cancer Registry. Peripheral blood DNA from at least 1 affected member of each family was analyzed for BRCA1 mutations, and tumors from BRCA1 mutation-positive families were compared with those from BRCA1-negative families. Of 66 patients from 36 BRCA1-positive families, 64 had ovarian carcinoma, 1 had an ovarian carcinoma in situ, and 1 had a dysgerminoma. Of 151 patients from 90 BRCA1-negative families, 135 had ovarian carcinoma, 10 had ovarian borderline tumors, 3 had ovarian sex cord/stromal tumors, and 3 had primary peritoneal carcinoma. There were fewer grade 1 (P <.001) and stage I (P =.10) cancers in patients from BRCA1-positive families than in patients from BRCA1-negative families. Neither mucinous nor borderline tumors were found in the BRCA1-positive families. Ovarian cancers arising in women from BRCA1-positive families are more likely to be high grade and nonmucinous than cancers arising in women from BRCA1-negative families. The absence of borderline tumors in patients from BRCA1-positive families adds to accumulating evidence that BRCA1 mutations do not play a role in the development of these tumors. HUM PATHOL 31:1420-1424.     

Anatomie der Brustdrüse

The human breast consists of lobes with a luminal glandular and a basal myoepithelial layer. Immunofluorescence studies have shown that the breast epithelium contains cytokeratin (CK)5/14-positive precursor cells which give rise to CK8/18-positive glandular or sm-actin-positive myoepithelial cells. Only some of the glandular cells contain estrogen receptors. The luminal epithelium of the lobules shows a much higher glandular differentiation than the ductal system. Diagnostically important cytokeratins of normal breast epithelium and its proliferative epithelial processes include luminal cytokeratins (CK7, CK8 and CK18) as markers of glandular differentiation and basal cytokeratins (CK5, CK14 and CK17) as markers of progenitor cells and early cells of the glandular and myoepithelial differentiation pathway. The most important myoepithelial markers are currently CD10, SMA, SMM-HC and Calponin.     

The intercellular adhesion molecule, cadherin-10, is a marker for human prostate luminal epithelial cells that is not expressed in prostate cancer.

During the normal turnover of prostate epithelium, stem cells in the basal cell layer produce an intermediate cell population that gives rise to fully differentiated secretory luminal cells. This process is extensively studied in relation to the development of prostate disease, in particular, to elucidate the origin and nature of prostate cancer. We previously showed that the mRNA of a poorly characterised intercellular adhesion molecule, cadherin-10, is strongly expressed in human prostate. Using anticadherin-10 antibodies, immunohistochemistry, and confocal microscopy, we have examined the pattern of cadherin-10 expression in relation to human prostate epithelial differentiation markers (E-cadherin, CD44, and cytokeratins (CK) 14, 18 and 19) in archival paraffin-embedded and fixed-frozen histopathological specimens in individual and serial sections. In non-neoplastic prostate, E-cadherin is expressed by all basal and luminal epithelial cells, while cadherin-10 is variably expressed in luminal cells where it is colocalised with E-cadherin at basolateral plasma membranes. Cadherin-10 is absent in CK14- and/or CD44-positive basal cells, but is expressed in CK18-positive luminal cells (differentiated secretory cells), a subset of CK19-positive intermediate/luminal cells, but not CK19-positive basal cells. Small foci of prostate cancer express E-cadherin, CK19 and CK18, but cadherin-10 expression is low or undetectable. These findings suggest that the expression of cadherin-10 is associated with the later stages of differentiation of luminal secretory cells, indicating a specific role in secretory cell terminal differentiation. While prostate cancer cells express secretory cell markers (eg, CK18, prostate-specific antigen) and the more generally expressed E-cadherin, their failure to express cadherin-10 further emphasises a role for this cadherin in normal prostate organisation and function.     

Cytokeratin and vimentin expression in normal and neoplastic canine prostate

Intermediate filament expression in the canine prostate, unlike that in human prostate, is represented in the literature by only a few reports. In this study, the expression of cytokeratin (CK) and vimentin was examined in three normal canine prostates and 11 canine prostatic carcinomas. Monoclonal antibodies directed against vimentin, CK AE1/AE3, CK 18-8 (for luminal epithelial cells), CK 5, CK clone 8.12 and CK 14 (for basal cells) were employed. As in man, normal canine prostatic luminal cells were positive for CK 8-18. Basal cells were positive for CK 5 and CK clone 8.12 but, in contrast to findings in man, were negative for CK 14. Luminal cells were vimentin-negative, whereas in man they have been reported as vimentin-positive. The majority of carcinomas showed an undifferentiated histological pattern and all were positive for CK AE1/AE3 and for vimentin. Ten tumours were positive for CK 8-12, but six of them showed many cells co-expressing CK 14. Moreover, in two of these six cases a large number of neoplastic cells also reacted with CK clone 8.12 antibody, and in one of them co-expression of CK 5 was detectable. This co-expression, of luminal and basal cytokeratins, suggests a possible origin of the tumours from prostatic epithelial stem cells. Vimentin expression is an inconstant finding in human prostatic carcinomas; its almost uniform occurrence in canine carcinomas suggests a lesser degree of differentiation than in the human neoplasm.     

p63 correlates with both BRCA1 and cytokeratin 5 in invasive breast carcinomas: further evidence for the pathogenesis of the basal phenotype of breast cancer

AIMS: To study the expression of p63, cytokeratin (CK) 5 and CK8/18 in invasive ductal carcinomas and their relationship with BRCA1 and other pathological and immunohistochemical features of clinical significance. METHODS AND RESULTS: Immunohistochemistry with the antibodies p63, CK5, CK8/18, BRCA1, oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, p53, c-erbB-2 and Ki67 was performed in 102 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples of invasive ductal carcinomas. The CK5+ cases were submitted to a double-immunolabelling study with p63. There was a strong relationship between CK5 and p63 expression and both markers were associated with hormonal receptor-negative high-grade carcinomas with high proliferative rate. Furthermore, there was coexpression of CK5 and p63 in neoplastic cells, indicating that p63, like CK5, is a marker of the basal phenotype of breast cancer. There was a strong relationship between reduced expression of BRCA1 with both p63 and CK5 expression as well as an inverse correlation between p63 and CK8/18 expression, suggesting that loss of p63 expression is required for the transition between a basal to a luminal phenotype of breast carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: Since p63 is thought to be a marker of stem cells and may act as an oncogene, our data support the idea that BRCA1 acts as stem cell regulator.     

Malignant adenomyoepithelioma of the breast combined with invasive lobular carcinoma

Presented herein is the first case of malignant adenomyoepithelioma (malignant AME) of the breast combined with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) in a 53-year-old woman. Histologically, the tumor was composed of nodular proliferation of biphasic epithelial and myoepithelial carcinoma, partially surrounded by ILC. Interestingly, ILC metastasized to the axillary lymph nodes, while biphasic epithelial and myoepithelial carcinoma hematogenously metastasized to the lung and the kidney. On immunohistochemistry the biphasic carcinoma consisted of cytokeratin (CK) 8/18-positive/CK5/6-positive/smooth muscle actin (SMA)-negative inner carcinoma cells and CK8/18-positive/CK5/6-positive/SMA-positive outer carcinoma cells. The monophasic ILC cells had a CK8/18-positive/CK5/6-negative/SMA-negative staining pattern. Although it is unclear whether both ILC and biphasic epithelial and myoepithelial carcinoma originated from AME or whether ILC occurred independently of malignant AME, this is an exceptionally rare case, which might give rise to a special consideration of the histogenesis of breast cancer.     

Intermediate cells in human prostate epithelium are enriched in proliferative inflammatory atrophy

Within the human prostate epithelium four cell populations can be discriminated based on their expression of keratins (K). Basal cells express high levels of K5 and K14, as well as p63, whereas they have very low levels of androgen receptor, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), K8, and K18. Luminal secretory cells lack p63, K5, and K14 but express high levels of K8, K18, androgen receptor, and PSA. Additionally, cells have been identified with a keratin phenotype intermediate between basal and luminal cells that co-express high levels of K5 and K18 (K5/18) as well as hepatocyte growth factor receptor c-MET. Although intermediate cells have been proposed as precursor cells of prostate cancer, their biology is ill defined. Epithelial cells in proliferative inflammatory atrophy (PIA) appear to be cycling rapidly as indicated by expression of Ki-67, and morphological transitions have been identified between PIA and high-grade prostate intraepithelial neoplasia. Many of the atrophic epithelial luminal cells in PIA are candidates for intermediate cells based in part on weak expression of PSA and androgen receptor, high levels of K8/18, and lack of p63. The objective of this study was to further clarify the phenotype of the proposed intermediate cells in PIA and to quantitatively determine the level in which these intermediate cells preferentially occur in PIA lesions. Intermediate cells were immunohistochemically demonstrated using antibodies to K5, K14, K18, and c-MET. Using radical prostatectomy specimens (n = 15) the area fraction of intermediate cells in normally differentiated prostate epithelium and PIA were quantified by a grid point counting method. Atrophic luminal cells of PIA lesions expressed K5 in 39.2 +/- 7.4% of cells compared to 2.4 +/- 2.3% in normal epithelium (P < 0.00001). By contrast, K14 was only expressed in 3.0 +/- 3.2% of the luminal cells. Previous studies have shown that virtually 100% of these atrophic luminal cells are strongly positive for K8/18. c-MET was present in 44.1 +/- 14.1% of luminal cells in PIA but only in 2.1 +/- 2.8% of luminal cells in normal epithelium (P < 0.00001). To unambiguously determine whether intermediate luminal cells in PIA show increased proliferative activity and decreased p27(kip1) expression, double-staining immunofluorescence of Ki-67 and K5, as well as p27(Kip1) and K5 was performed. Luminal cells in PIA often co-expressed K5 and Ki-67. Although p27(Kip1) was strongly expressed in K5-negative differentiated cells in normal epithelium, p27(Kip1) staining was absent in many of the K5-positive cells in the luminal compartment of PIA. We conclude that cells phenotypically intermediate between basal and secretory cells are enriched in PIA lesions. The finding of a large number of highly proliferating intermediate cells in PIA provides further support that these cells may serve as preferred target cells in prostate carcinogenesis.     

Lipomatous basal cell adenoma (Basal cell lipoadenoma) – Report of the first two cases

We present, to the best of our knowledge, the first two cases (60 year old female and 71 year old male) of basal cell adenoma with significant adipocytic components and suggest the term “lipomatous basal cell adenoma” for these lesions. Both tumors presented as slow growing nodules in the parotid gland. The two cases represent different points on a histopathological spectrum with one case being extremely well differentiated with distinct spiradenoma-like histological features; distinct bilayering, duct formation with secretory material and very low proliferative activity and the other case displaying more primitive cytological features composed of a predominant uniform, (p63-positive; CK 7-negative) basaloid, abluminal cell type, high proliferative activity and only scattered true ducts composed of (CK7-positive, p63-negative) luminal cells.     

Cytokeratin profiles of male breast cancers

AIMS: The prognostic factors and expression of molecular markers in male breast carcinomas are similar to those in female breast cancers. The identification of distinct cytokeratin (CK) profiles (basal as opposed to luminal cells) helps to identify subsets of tumours with different clinical behaviour. The aim of this study was to investigate CK expression in male breast cancer. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-two cases of male breast cancer were studied. The panel of CKs studied by immunohistochemistry included: 5/6, 14, 17, 18 and 19. Pathological findings and CK expression were analysed in all cases. Histological patterns included ductal carcinoma in situ, invasive ductal carcinoma and mixed patterns. Four cases were positive for CK5/6 and CK14, identifying a basal-like phenotype. CK17 was negative in all but two cases. All cases expressing either CK5/6 or CK14 were invasive carcinomas of high nuclear and histological grade and were also larger compared with the tumours not expressing CK5/6 and CK14. All tumours except three (also negative for CK5/6) expressed CK18 and CK19. The four basal-like tumours were negative for Her-2 expression. CONCLUSIONS: Male breast carcinomas have a basal-like phenotype that is similar in frequency to that of female breast carcinomas. The expression of CK5/6 and CK14 identifies a subset of pathologically aggressive male breast cancers.     

免疫组织化学诊断标准对基底细胞样型乳腺癌预后分析的影响

目的 探讨不同的免疫组织化学(IHC)诊断标准对基底细胞样型乳腺癌(BLBC)预后分析的影响及意义.方法 收集1996-2002年并有5年以上随访资料的浸润性乳腺癌284例,IHC检测ER、PR、HER2、CK5/6、CK14、表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)的表达,按照Nielsen标准[ER-/HER2-,CK5/6+和(或)EGFR+]、Kim标准[ER-/PR-/HER2-,CK5/6+和(或)CK14+和(或)EGFR+]、基底样CK标准[CK5/6+和(或)CK14+]、三阴性标准[ER-/PR-/HER2-]标准分型并比较其5年生存率.结果 在4种标准下,284例浸润性乳腺癌中BLBC的发病率分别为15.5%(44例)、14.8%(42例)、43.3%(123例)、21.1%(60例);复发率分别为18.2%(8/44)、21.4%(9/42)、10.6%(13/123)、11.7%(7/60),均明显高于其他亚型,但仅在Nielsen和Kim标准中之BLBC型的复发率与其他型差异有统计学意义.Nielsen和三阴性标准中BLBC型之5年无病生存率(均P<0.01)和5年总生存率(P<0.05和0.01)显著低于腺腔A型;Kim标准中BLBC型5年无病生存率显著低于腺腔A型(P<0.01),但5年总生存率与其他分型差异无统计学意义;基底样CK标准的BLBC型与非BLBC型之5年生存率差异无统计学意义.结论 在不同的IHC诊断标准下BLBC均呈高复发和预后差的趋势,但不同的分型标准影响其预后分析结果 ,相对完善、统一的诊断标准是亟待解决的问题.     

KIT is highly expressed in adenoid cystic carcinoma of the breast, a basal-like carcinoma associated with a favorable outcome.

Recent biological studies have classified breast carcinomas into HER2-overexpressing, estrogen receptor-positive/luminal, basal- and normal-like groups. According to this new biological classification, the objectives of our study were to assess the clinical, morphologic and immunophenotypic characteristics of adenoid cystic carcinoma of the breast in order to classify this subtype of breast carcinoma. A total of 18 cases of adenoid cystic carcinoma were identified from the Institut Curie files. Clinical information was available for 16 patients with a median follow-up of 6.5 years. Morphologically, all tumors were graded according to the system defined by Kleer and Oberman (histologic and nuclear grade). Immunophenotype was assessed with anti-ER, PR, HER-2, KIT, basal (CK5/6) and luminal cytokeratins (CK8/18) and p63 antibodies. One out of 18 tumors was nuclear grade 1 (16%), nine were nuclear grade 2 (50%) and eight were nuclear grade 3 (44%). All cases were estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and HER-2 negative. Epithelial cells were strongly positive around glandular lumina with one or both cytokeratins, identifying the coexistence of CK5/6+ cells, CK5/6 and CK8/18+ cells, CK8/18+ cells and p63+ cells. All cases (100%) were also KIT positive. In all, 15 patients were treated by surgery. Nine of them received adjuvant radiotherapy. Follow-up was available for 16 patients. In all, 14 patients were alive. Two of them, initially treated by surgery only, presented a local recurrence. Two patients died (one of them treated by radiation therapy only died from her disease). Our study shows that adenoid cystic carcinoma of the breast is a special, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER-2 negative and highly KIT-positive, basal-like breast carcinoma, associated with an excellent prognosis. This highly specific immunophenotype could be useful to differentiate adenoid cystic carcinoma of the breast from other subtypes of breast carcinoma such as cribriform carcinoma.     

Phenotypic evaluation of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma.

Microarray profiling of invasive breast carcinomas has identified five distinct subtypes of tumors (luminal A, luminal B, normal breast-like, HER2 overexpressing, and basal-like) that are associated with different clinical outcomes. The basal-like subtype is associated with poor clinical outcomes and is the subtype observed in BRCA1-related breast cancers. The aim of this study was to characterize the histologic and immunophenotypic properties of breast basal-like carcinomas that were first positively identified using DNA microarray analysis. Detailed histologic review was performed on 56 tumors with known microarray profiles (23 basal-like, 23 luminal, and 12 HER2+). Immunohistochemistry for estrogen receptor (ER), HER2, EGFR, smooth muscle actin (SMA), p63, CD10, cytokeratin 5/6, cytokeratin 8/18, and vimentin was performed on 18 basal-like, 16 luminal, and 12 HER2+ tumors. The basal-like tumors were grade 3 ductal/NOS (21/23) or metaplastic (2/23) carcinomas that frequently showed geographic necrosis (17/23), a pushing border of invasion (14/23), and a stromal lymphocytic response (13/23). Most basal-like tumors showed immunoreactivity for vimentin (17/18), luminal cytokeratin 8/18 (15/18), EGFR (13/18), and cytokeratin 5/6 (11/18), while positivity for the myoepithelial markers SMA (4/18), p63 (4/18) and CD10 (2/18) was infrequent. All basal-like tumors tested were ER- and HER2-. Morphologic features significantly associated with the basal-like subtype included markedly elevated mitotic count (P<0.0001), geographic tumor necrosis (P=0.0003), pushing margin of invasion (P=0.0001), and stromal lymphocytic response (P=0.01). The most consistent immunophenotype seen in the basal-like tumors was negativity for ER and HER2, and positivity for vimentin, EGFR, cytokeratin 8/18, and cytokeratin 5/6. The infrequent expression of myoepithelial markers in basal-like carcinomas does not support a direct myoepithelial cell derivation of these tumors. These findings should further assist in the identification of basal-like carcinomas in clinical specimens, facilitating treatment and epidemiologic studies of this tumor subtype.     

Cytokeratin KRT8/18 expression differentiates distinct subtypes of grade 3 invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast

Invasive ductal carcinomas of the breast (IDC) are routinely assessed on hematoxylin and eosin stained paraffin sections, with limited use of immunohistochemistry (IHC). Most IDC are regarded as a single diagnostic entity, IDC of no special type (IDC-NST), which is subdivided further only by grading. However, recent research suggests that there is high clinical relevance in differentiating IDC subtypes. Here, we ascertain whether tumor histology alone can predict basal or luminal cell phenotype in high-grade IDC-NST, and whether IHC and molecular characteristics are associated with the observed morphologies. A total of 29 grade 3 IDC-NST samples were studied, 10 tumors from a selected pilot cohort A and 19 tumors from an unselected validation cohort B. Along with histopathological assessment, the expression of ESR1, PGR, ERBB2 (HER-2), the basal/myoepithelial marker TP73L (p63), cytokeratins 5/6 (KRT5/6) and 14 (KRT14), and the luminal-specific cytokeratins 8/18 (KRT 8/18) and 19 (KRT19) was assessed by IHC. Hierarchical cluster analysis of clinicopathological variables and, separately, microarray expression profiles showed that the phenotypically distinctive basaloid and luminal tumors of cohort A fell into two main groups, defined by heterogeneous or uniformly positive expression of KRT8/18. The 38 genes differentially expressed between these two classes included ERBB2, KRT8, and six other genes previously associated with ERBB2-positive or luminal phenotypes. Tumor histology was not predictive for validation cohort B, but quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis revealed two molecularly defined clusters that again aligned with the KRT8/18 staining phenotypes. Metaphase comparative genomic hybridization revealed 10q, 16q, and 20q copy-number imbalances that associated recurrently with KRT8/18 staining patterns.     

Nonsebaceous lymphadenoma of salivary glands: proposed development from intraparotid lymph nodes and risk of misdiagnosis

Nonsebaceous lymphadenoma (NSLA) is a rare benign salivary gland tumor composed of lymphoid and epithelial components. By definition, the epithelial component lacks sebaceous differentiation and instead displays a wide range of histological differentiation. In this study, we have collected nine cases of NSLA to characterize their histological and immunohistochemical profiles. The samples were histologically reviewed and immunohistochemical stains for CK5/6, CK7, CK14, CK18, p63, and Ki67 performed. Patients were six males and three females (mean age, 50 years). All tumors were located in the parotid gland and showed intimate intermingling of lymphoid tissue with islands or strands of epithelium with a wide spectrum of histological differentiation. The immunohistochemical profiles mirrored the epithelial differentiation; hence, areas with basaloid or lymphoepithelial differentiation strongly expressed CK5/6, CK14, and p63, while areas with ductal differentiation showed strong positivity for CK18/CK7 and CK5/6/CK14/p63 in luminal and basal cell layers, respectively. A hilus structure with salivary inclusions or D2-40 (podoplanin)-positive marginal sinus was identifiable in four and nine of the cases, respectively, supporting origin within intra-/periparotid lymph nodes. Six cases were initially misdiagnosed as other benign (n?=?4) or malignant tumors (n?=?2). Our study on the second largest series of NSLA reported to date provides strong evidence that NSLA belongs to the group of salivary gland tumors that pathogenetically develop from embryonic salivary gland inclusions in intra-/periparotid lymph nodes. Knowledge of the wide histological spectrum of this rare and presumably underreported tumor is important in order to avoid misdiagnosis, particularly as malignant tumor.     

Expression of luminal and basal cytokeratins in human breast carcinoma

We have examined basal and luminal cell cytokeratin expression in 1944 cases of invasive breast carcinoma, using tissue microarray (TMA) technology, to determine the frequency of expression of each cytokeratin subtype, their relationships and prognostic relevance, if any. Expression was determined by immunocytochemistry staining using antibodies to the luminal cytokeratins (CKs) 7/8, 18 and 19 and the basal markers CK 5/6 and CK 14. Additionally, assessment of alpha-smooth muscle actin (SMA) and oestrogen receptor status (ER) was performed. The vast majority of the cases showed positivity for CK 7/8, 18 and 19 indicating a differentiated glandular phenotype, a finding associated with good prognosis, ER positivity and older patient age. In contrast, basal marker expression was significantly related to poor prognosis, ER negativity and younger patient age. Multivariate analysis showed that CK 5/6 was an independent indicator for relapse free interval. We were able to subgroup the cases into four distinct phenotype categories (pure luminal, mixed luminal/basal, pure basal and null), which had significant differences in relation to the biological features and the clinical course of the disease. Tumours classified as expressing a basal phenotype (the combined luminal plus basal and the pure basal) were in a poor prognostic subgroup, typically ER negative in most cases. These findings provide further evidence that breast cancer has distinct differentiation subclasses that have both biological and clinical relevance.     

BRCA1-methylated sporadic breast cancers are BRCA-like in showing a basal phenotype and absence of ER expression

BRCA1 mutations have been associated with hereditary breast cancer only. Recent studies indicate that a subgroup of sporadic breast cancer might also be associated with reduction in BRCA1 mRNA levels and protein expression. However, the mechanism of reduced mRNA and protein expression is yet not fully elucidated. This study aims to assess BRCA1 protein expression and the role of BRCA1 promoter methylation in sporadic breast cancer in North Indian population and to correlate these with known prognostic factors and molecular profiles of breast cancer. BRCA1 protein expression was normal (>50?% tumour cells) in 41 (43?%) cases, reduced (20-50?% tumour cells) in 33 (35?%) cases and absent/markedly reduced (<20?% tumour cells) in 21 (22.1?%) cases. Cases which were negative for BRCA1 protein were more frequently positive for basal markers (29 versus 5?%) and were more often ER-negative (62 versus 39?%) than BRCA1-positive tumours. Methylation of BRCA1 promoter region was seen in 11/45 cases (24?%). All 11 cases showing BRCA1 methylation had absent (eight cases) or reduced (three cases) BRCA1 protein expression. BRCA1 protein-negative tumours were more frequently basal marker-positive and ER-negative, highlighting the 'BRCAness' of sporadic breast cancer with loss of BRCA1 protein expression through promoter hypermethylation similar to hereditary breast cancer with BRCA1 mutations. Loss of BRCA1 in sporadic breast cancer suggests that therapeutics targeting BRCA1 pathway in hereditary breast cancer like PARP inhibitors might be used as therapeutic targets for sporadic breast tumours.     

Are synchronous and metachronous bilateral breast cancers different? An immunohistochemical analysis aimed at intrinsic tumor phenotype

The biology and pathomechanism of bilateral breast cancers is not fully understood. We compared the morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics of primary tumors in patients with synchronous bilateral breast cancers and metachronous bilateral breast cancers, with special focus on intrinsic tumor phenotype. Methods: Tumor morphology and expression of 8 immunohistochemical markers were assessed in tissue microarrays containing primary breast tumor cores from 113 metachronous bilateral breast cancers and 61 synchronous bilateral breast cancers. Analyzed markers included hormone receptors (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor), HER2, Ki67, cytokeratin 5/6, E-cadherin, vimentin and epidermal growth factor receptor. Cutoff levels are provided in the table. Results: Metachronous bilateral breast cancers tumors had lower estrogen receptor expression (p=0.047) and higher expression of cytokeratin 5/6 (p=0.017) and of vimentin (p=0.008); in multivariate analysis only vimentin retained the significance (p=0.01). Ten (13%) and 11 (26%) of metachronous bilateral breast cancers and synchronous bilateral breast cancers had luminal A phenotype, 39 (50%) and 15 (36%) were luminal B HER2-negative, 13 (17%) and 12 (28%) - luminal B HER2-positive, 3 (4%) and 2 (5%) - HER2-positive (not luminal), and 12 (16%) and 2 (5%) had triple negative phenotype (p=0.07). Conclusion: Metachronous bilateral breast cancers, compared to synchronous bilateral breast cancers, are characterized by more aggressive phenotype, expressed by lower expression of estrogen receptor and stronger expression of cytokeratin 5/6 and vimentin; this does not, however, translate into differences in the distribution of intrinsic tumor phenotypes.     

Chromosome 2q24.2 is lost in sporadic but not in BRCA1-associated ovarian carcinomas

AIMS: Comparison between BRCA1-associated and sporadic ovarian carcinomas is a potential method to identify candidate modifier gene/s involved in the carcinogenic pathway of either or both groups. A previous study identified a significant difference in the frequency of copy number gain at 2q24-q32 by comparing BRCA1-associated and sporadic ovarian tumour specimens using comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH). The present study aimed to investigate the reported allelic imbalance at 2q24-32 by amplification of several microsatellite markers at the region by quantitative microsatellite analysis (QuMA) using Taqman at the same region identified as a site of allelic imbalance. METHODS: The copy number of the genomic region in 2q24-32 was established in 21 BRCA1-associated ovarian carcinomas and 14 sporadic cases using quantitative microsatellite polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Statistical analysis was performed using permutation test analysis. RESULTS: A significant loss at D2S156 marker (2q24.2) (p = 0.026) compared with the other three markers at 2q24-32 was found in the sporadic cohort but not in the BRCA1-associated group (p = 0.385). CONCLUSIONS: Our data do not support the association between copy number gain at 2q24-32 and BRCA1 mutation status in ovarian cancers reported previously. The novel finding of the present study was significant loss at 2q24.2 in sporadic ovarian cancers.